Stoma Closure Research Articles

Consensus-driven protocol for transanal irrigation in patients with low anterior resection syndrome and functional constipation.

This study aims to establish a consensus-based standard protocol for transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and functional constipation. The Delphi method was utilized to reach a consensus among clinicians and nurses expert in the field of colorectal surgery and gastroenterology. To address various uncertainties concerning technical aspects, difficulties, and prescription of TAI, two questionnaires were developed and analyzed in two rounds. A binary approach was employed, setting a consensus threshold of 75% agreement. In the first round, nurses achieved consensus on all statements, while clinicians required a second round to reach consensus, particularly regarding prescription and technical aspects. Clinicians reached consensus on prescribing TAI as a second-line treatment for LARS and functional constipation, following the failure of conservative measures such as dietary and lifestyle interventions. Timing considerations for patients with LARS encompass avoiding TAI within 1month of stoma closure and waiting a minimum of 3months. For functional constipation, TAI is recommended for slow transit constipation, emphasizing its preference over surgical options. Consensus was also reached on the choice of catheter for patients with LARS, training requirements for patients and caregivers, preparation of the patient's intestine before TAI, and recommended irrigations. This consensus study successfully developed a standardized TAI protocol for LARS and functional constipation. It provides comprehensive guidelines for prescription and technical aspects, addressing the challenges encountered by healthcare professionals. The protocol aims to enhance patient care, improve treatment outcomes, and contribute to the advancement of TAI.

A Retrospective Study of Cricotracheostomy: Indications, Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes.

Cricotracheostomy (CT) is a surgical procedure for airway access that can be performed using 2 techniques: excising the cricoid cartilage (CTrach), or by creating an inverted U-shaped flap from the first tracheal ring (CTrachT). The aims of this study are to clinically evaluate factors such as patient background, complications, and stoma closure status in patients who underwent CT, and to compare the clinical outcomes between CTrach and CTrachT. Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Single-institution academic center. Records of patients who underwent CT at the University of Tokyo Hospital between 2014 and March 2024 were reviewed, detailing their demographics and clinical characteristics. We investigated differences in clinical backgrounds, complication risks for each surgical procedure, and factors contributing to stoma closure and complications after CT. The median age for patients undergoing CT was 70 years, predominantly male (76%), and most were malnourished. Common indications included low-lying larynx and obesity. Stoma closure was achieved in 16% of patients. Early complications were surgical site infection (9%) and subcutaneous emphysema (2%), with granuloma formation in 20%. The CTrach group had a significantly higher median age (P = .03), but other factors showed no significant differences. CTrachT was more often performed by board-certified specialists (P = .04). Stoma closure rates and complications were not significantly influenced by any single factor. CT presents a viable option with minimal postoperative complications for patients wherein conventional tracheotomy may be more challenging, such as in low-lying larynx, obesity, advanced age, and poor nutritional status.

Postoperative continuation of antibiotic prophylaxis beyond 24 h is unnecessary for abdominal surgeries in children and neonates

PurposeDespite recent WHO recommendations, antibiotic prophylaxis is routinely continued for several days after surgery. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis cessation within 24 h after abdominal surgeries MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent 3 representative gastrointestinal surgeries (1; transumbilical small bowel procedure for intestinal atresia or stenosis, 2; extrahepatic bile duct resection, and hepaticojejunostomy for congenital biliary dilatation, 3; stoma closure for intestinal perforation, anorectal malformation, or inflammatory bowel disease) at our institution between 2011 and 2023. The demographic data collected included age, preoperative hemoglobin level, albumin level, body mass index, and ASA class. Intraoperative and postoperative data were also collected. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the duration of perioperative antibiotics (‘within 24 h’ and ‘beyond 24 h’), and the incidence of superficial incisional SSI (siSSI) was compared between the 2 groups in each procedure ResultsDuring the study period, 25 cases underwent transumbilical small bowel procedure, 23 cases underwent hepaticojejunostomy, and 45 cases underwent stoma closure. The preoperative care bundle including bowel preparation, cleansing, and operative procedures has not changed during the study period. First- and third-generation cephalosporins were administered to all the patients. All patients received their first single dose of antibiotics within 60 min before the skin incision. In particular, 14 patients who underwent small-bowel procedures received only a single dose. The SSI rates for small bowel procedures, hepaticojejunostomy, and stoma closure were 0%, 4.4%, and 4.4%, respectively. No SSIs were observed in any of the procedures in the 'within 24 h' group ConclusionBased on our study, we conclude that ≤24 h of postoperative continuation of antibiotic prophylaxis is sufficient for siSSI prevention in hepaticojejunostomy and stoma closure. Additionally, single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is adequate for neonatal small bowel procedures.

Predictive factors of major low anterior resection syndrome after surgery for rectal tumors.

To describe the epidemiological and clinical data of impaired functional outcome secondary to anterior resection of the rectum and to identify the predictive factors of major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) Methods: This retrospective study considered patients operated on for rectal tumors in surgical department in our hospital, between January 1st,2009 and December 31st, 2021. The primary outcome measure was the development of a major LARS immediately or after stoma closure. In order to identify independent predictors of major LARS, patients were divided into two groups: the "Major LARS" group and the "No Major LARS" group, and then we carried out a descriptive study, followed by an analytical study with logistic regression. We enrolled 42 patients operated for rectal tumor and had an anterior resection. Half of our patients developed LARS of which 14 developed major LARS. The median time to onset of LARS symptoms was 9 [2 -24] months. At the end of this study, 2 factors were retained: age (OR=2.48; CI95% [1.2- 5.10], p=0.012) and pT3T4 stage (OR=5.95; CI95% [1.07- 33.33], p=0.041) as independent predictive factors of a major LARS. Neoadjuvant therapy was also a risk factor for major LARS in our study with a statistically significant difference (p=0.025) between the two groups "Major LARS" and "No major LARS". LARS should be appropriately considered in the management of rectal cancer. Based on our results and data from the literature, age and mesorectal invasion were found to be independent predictors of major LARS.

Investigating colostomy-related morbidity in children following stoma formation and closure in a tertiary hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cohort study 2024

BackgroundOverall, stoma-related morbidity affects a reported 20–38% of pediatric patients. However, determining the true incidence of major stoma-related morbidity is challenging due to limited cohort sizes in existing studies. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate colostomy related morbidity among children both after stoma formation and stoma closure.MethodologyThis is a retrospective cohort hospital-based study, conducted in an Abha maternity and children hospital, between August 1, 2018, and August 1, 2023, among 126 pediatric patients (aged 0–12 years) who underwent colostomy formation and subsequent closure during the study period. Data were collected from medical records. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v.26.ResultsThis study included a total of 126 children who underwent colostomy. (N = 37, 29.4%) of cases included in this study were emergency cases, while (N = 89, 70.6%) were elective. A variety of antibiotics were used for surgical prophylaxis, metronidazole (77%) and cefuroxime (62.7%) were the most prevalent. Oral feeding was started after 5–6 days in more than one third of cases (39.7%). Wound infection (N = 15, 11.9%) was the most reported post-operative complication, followed with bowel obstruction (N = 6, 4.8%). Emergency cases had a longer duration of hospital stay than elective cases; this difference was statistically significant (P = .04).ConclusionsMajority of patients reported no stoma related complications, while among those who reported complications, wound infection was the most reported complication, followed by bowel obstruction.

Timing of Stoma Closure in Neonates: the ToSCiN mixed-methods study.

Neonates undergoing emergency abdominal surgery frequently require a stoma; closing this stoma with a second operation is an essential part of recovery. Timing of closure varies. Optimal timing is unclear and would be best resolved through a randomised controlled trial; such a trial is likely to be challenging. To determine if it is feasible to conduct a clinical trial comparing 'early' versus 'late' stoma closure in neonates. Mixed methods comprising three parallel workstreams incorporating: a clinician survey, prospective observational cohort study, parent interviews, focus groups, database analyses and consensus meeting. Specialist neonatal surgical centres across the United Kingdom. Neonatologists, neonatal surgeons, neonatal dietitians and neonatal nurses who care for neonates with stomas. Neonates with recent stoma, their parents and the clinicians looking after them. Three existing, overlapping clinical databases. One hundred and sixty-six professionals from all 27 neonatal surgical centres completed the survey: 6 weeks was the most common target time for stoma closure across clinical scenarios, although there was wide variation. Timing of closure was influenced by nutrition, growth and stoma complications. The prospective cohort study enrolled 56 infants from 8 centres. Infants were mostly preterm with necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation. Clinicians identified extreme preterm gestation and clinical conditions as reasons for not randomising babies into a hypothetical trial comparing early and late stoma closure. Parents and healthcare professionals identified that comparator arms needed more clinical flexibility in relation to timing of stoma closure. Analysis of existing databases revealed wide variation in current timing of stoma closure in neonates and identified approximately 300 eligible infants for a trial per annum in the United Kingdom. A trial of 'early' compared to 'late' stoma closure in neonates is feasible and is important to families and health professionals. The population of eligible babies in the United Kingdom is sufficient for such a trial. Challenges centre around lack of equipoise in certain scenarios, specifically: extremely preterm infants; infants waiting too long for stoma closure in the 'late' comparator; and logistical issues in closing a stoma at a trial-allocated time. These challenges are addressable by incorporating flexibility based on gestation at birth, communicating that both trial arms are standard practice and valid treatment options, and providing resources, for example, for operating lists. We recommend the following population, intervention, comparator and outcome as a starting point to inform future trial design. Population: neonates with stomas (excluding those with a fixed treatment pathway). Intervention: stoma closure at 6 weeks and after 32 weeks post conceptual age. Comparator: expectant management with stoma closure undertaken when the clinical team determines is best for the infant. Primary outcomes: weight gain/growth or length of hospital stay. This study is registered as IRAS Project ID 278331, REC Reference 20/LO/1227. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128617) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 71. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Economic burden of pelvic sepsis after anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cost-of-illness analysis.

Anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery remains a challenging complication, with a nonhealing rate of approximately 50% at 1 year. Pelvic sepsis may require tertiary treatment that encompasses additional admissions, extensive surgery and other types of interventions. The aim of this study is to analyse the financial burden of pelvic sepsis in a tertiary hospital. From 2010 until 2020, all patients referred to a tertiary centre for pelvic sepsis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer were prospectively registered and retrospectively reviewed. The cost analysis adhered to Dutch National Healthcare Institute guidelines and covered hospital-imposed medical costs from salvage surgery to the last registered intervention, adjusted for inflation and priced in euros. This analysis included 126 patients, with an average total cost per patient of €31 131. Salvage surgery accounted for €21 326, with an additional €9805 for reinterventions and readmissions. Salvage surgery comprised nonrestorative surgery in 48% and restorative salvage surgery in the remaining cases. Length of hospital stay averaged 9.6 days on the general ward and 0.8 days in the intensive care unit. Common reinterventions included endoscopic vacuum sponge changes (n = 153), stoma closures (n = 59) and radiological abscess drainages (n = 51). Total costs did not differ significantly between nonrestorative surgery and restorative surgery (mean = €31 950 vs. €30 362, respectively; p = 0.893). Treating pelvic sepsis after rectal cancer resection in a tertiary hospital carries a substantial economic burden, averaging €31 131 per patient, and this work helps to quantify the potential economic impact of innovative care to reduce anastomotic leakage.

Infectious Complications After Modified Purse-String Stoma Closure

Infectious Complications After Modified Purse-String Stoma Closure

Diverting ileostomy in benign colorectal surgery: the real clinical cost analysis.

There are three types of complications stoma related: ones related to its construction, ones related to its function and related to closure. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of complications related to the stoma presence and to identificate variables related to complications. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent sphincter-preserving elective surgery for benign condition between January 2013 and December 2020 at IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital in Negrar, Verona. Data were collected regarding demographics and complications associated with primary surgery, stoma closure and the interval period. Univariable and multivariable analysIs were conducted. A total of 446 (12.2%) diverting loop ileostomies were performed. At index procedure, 76 (17%) patients had complications and 34 patients had complications related to ileostomy creation. Twenty patients (4.4%) were re admitted before stoma closure for dehydration. One hundred and eighty-seven patients (41.9%) suffered from ileostomy management's problems. At univariate analysis, complications of having stoma are more frequent in elder patients (p = 0.013), ASA score > 2 (p = 0.02), IBD diagnosis (p = < 0.001) and patients who had ileostomy creation complications (p = 0.04). At stoma closure, 55 (12.3%) patients had complications. Forty-seven patients (10.5%) presented incisional hernia in the stoma closure site. Ileostomy closure complications are more common with ASA score > 2 (p = 0.01) and IBD diagnosis (p < 0.001). IBD was found an independent factor of poor outcome at the time of ileostomy creation and closure. Developing complications at the time of ileostomy creation is statistically related to develop complications during ileostomy maintenance at multivariable analysis A loop ileostomy is usually created to limit the potentially life-threatening consequenceS of anastomotic leakage, but it is not able to decrease the leak-related mortality, wound sepsis, postoperative bleeding and small bowel obstruction. Debate rises not only for its uncertain efficacy but also because of the significant morbidity related to stoma. The surgeon could use these data in order to tailor his surgical strategy to the patients and their disease.

Surgical approach for a refractory enterocutaneous fistula by combining laparoscopic surgery and a planned open conversion: a case report

BackgroundAn enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) is defined as an abnormal communication between the gastrointestinal tract and skin. ECFs are rarely encountered in clinical practice, yet are frequently difficult to treat. Few reports exist regarding the surgical techniques for the treatment of an ECF. Therefore, we report a case of refractory ECF with concomitant severe adhesions, in which we performed combined laparoscopic adhesiolysis and planned open conversion.Case presentationA 57-year-old female patient underwent a laparotomy for an ovarian cyst in her 20s. At 46 years, adhesiolysis without bowel resection was performed for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO). However, her symptoms did not improve. Eighteen days postoperatively, she underwent a reoperation and jejunostomy. An ECF developed post-reoperation; therefore, stoma closure and radical surgery for the ECF were planned. Due to the severe adhesions, only stoma closure was performed, based on intraoperative assessments. The patient was subsequently referred to our hospital. First, skin care around the fistula was provided during an outpatient visit. Appropriate sizing of the stoma pouch was performed, to improve erosions and ulcers. Thereafter, debridement of the perifistula skin and simple closure of the ECF outlet were attempted; however, the ECF recurred shortly thereafter. After 8 years of regular skin care, with the ECF remaining stable, however, manifesting as symptomatic SBO, she underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis. This procedure was initiated in the epigastric region, where relatively fewer adhesions were anticipated. Post-open conversion, partial resection of the small intestine at four locations, including the fistula site, was performed. Postoperatively, jejunal edema and peristaltic dysfunction, due to narrowing of the superior mesenteric artery occurred. Regular drainage by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was required. However, she improved and was discharged 3 months post-operatively. Three years post-operatively, the ECF and SBO did not recur.ConclusionsWe reported a case of refractory ECF in which we were able to safely perform surgery, by combining laparoscopic adhesiolysis and a planned open conversion. Therefore, the surgical approach used in this case may be an option for securing a safe surgical field, while avoiding collateral damage.

Long-term cost-effectiveness of insertion of a biological mesh during stoma-site closure: 5-8-year follow-up of the ROCSS randomized controlled trial.

The original ROCSS trial demonstrated a significant reduction in clinically detectable incisional hernias at 2 years in patients receiving prophylactic biological mesh during stoma closure. ROCSS-Ex was designed to investigate the 5-8-year cost-effectiveness of mesh in the surviving cohort using an abdominal wall-specific quality of life score. Eligible participants from original UK centres were identified. The primary outcome (abdominal wall-specific quality of life) was measured using the HerQLes score and EQ-5D-5L. Assessors remained blind to patients' original allocation, even if the patient was aware of their treatment. Of the original 790 patients, 598 were available for long-term follow-up. HerQLes scores were available for 396 patients (no mesh: 191, mesh: 205). There was no difference in primary outcome between the two groups (mean difference of 1.48, 95% c.i. (-2.35, 5.32), P = 0.45) and no cost benefit of routine insertion of prophylactic biological mesh across the entire cohort in the long term. However, patients who received mesh experienced significantly fewer stoma site complications within the first 3 years after reversal and needed fewer surgical reinterventions (32 versus 54 for the no mesh group; incidence rate ratio of 0.55, 95% c.i. (0.31, 0.97), P = 0.04). ROCSS-Ex has shown equivocal outcomes for prophylactic mesh insertion versus standard repair on abdominal wall-specific quality of life 5-8 years after surgery. As most reinterventions occurred within the first 3 years post-surgery, there may be a role for prophylactic mesh in a subset of patients who would be most adversely affected by repeated surgery early on. ISRCTN25584182 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Comparison of short-term outcomes and defecatory function following robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for stapled-ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-a retrospective cohort study.

This study assessed the potential advantages of robotic-assisted Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Ro Stapled-IPAA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (Lap), with a focus on short-term outcomes and postoperative defecatory function, an aspect not previously explored. Out of a total of 132 patients who underwent proctocolectomy or residual rectal resection, consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive Stapled-IPAA for UC at our hospital from May 2014 to May 2024 were included. The Ro approach was chosen for individuals with severe colitis extending into the anal canal, deeper rectal cancers (beyond T1), and cases requiring residual rectal resection, taking advantage of its benefits. Perioperative outcomes, including anastomosis height, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complication rate, postoperative hospital stay, and defecatory function using Wexner scores and anorectal manometry before proctocolectomy and 6 months after stoma closure, were compared between the Ro and Lap groups. 33 patients (Lap, n=21; Ro, n=12) were included. The Ro group demonstrated a significantly lower anastomosis height (0.5 vs. 3.0 cm, P<0.001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (35 vs. 118mL, P=0.032), shorter postoperative hospital stay (8 vs. 10.5d), and no cases of anastomotic leakage (0% vs. 14.3%), as compared to the Lap group. Pouch failure occurred in 14% of Lap group; none were observed in the Ro group. Wexner scores favored the Ro group at 12 months after stoma closure (0 vs. 8 points), and there was better maximum voluntary squeeze pressure (302mmHg vs. 175mmHg, P=0.03), indicating preserved contraction of the external sphincter muscle despite the lower anastomosis. Ro Stapled-IPAA for patients with UC led to better short-term outcomes and preservation of defecatory function with lower anastomosis than Lap, suggesting the clinical advantages of the robotic approach in this field.

Intestinal microbial and metabolite profile in infants with small bowel stomas after bowel resection.

Infants with small bowel stomas (SBstoma) frequently struggle with absorption and rely on parenteral nutrition (PN). Intestinal absorption is difficult to predict based solely on intestinal anatomy. The purpose of this study was to characterize the microbiota and metabolic by-products within stoma effluent and correlate with clinical features and intestinal absorption. Prospective cohort study collecting stoma samples from neonates with SBstoma (N = 23) or colostomy control (N = 6) at initial enteral feed (first sample) and before stoma closure (last sample). Gut bacteriome (16S ribosomal RNA [rRNA] sequencing), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and bile acids (BAs) were characterized along with volume and energy content of a 48 h collection via bomb calorimetry (last sample). Hierarchical clustering and linear regression were used to compare the bacteriome and BAs/SCFAs, to bowel length, PN, and growth. Infants with ≤50% small bowel lost more fluid on average than those with >50% and controls (22, 18, 16 mL/kg/day, p = 0.013), but had similar energy losses (7, 10, 9 kcal/kg/day, p = 0.147). Infants growing poorly had enrichment of Proteobacteria compared to infants growing well (90% vs. 15%, p = 0.004). An increase in the ratio of secondary BAs within the small bowel over time, correlated with poor prognostic factors (≤50% small bowel, >50% of calories from PN, and poor growth). Infants with SBstoma and poor growth have a unique bacteriome community and those with poor enteral tolerance have metabolic differences compared to infants with improved absorption.

Transanal minimally invasive proctectomy for ulcerative colitis is beneficial in terms of short-term outcomes and defecation function.

Despite being reported safety, the advantages of transanal minimally invasive proctocolectomy (TAMIP) are controversial, and comparative studies on postoperative defecation function between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) using laparoscopic transanal manipulation (TAMIP-IPAA) and without this technique (traditional IPAA) are lacking. This study analyzed TAMIP's impact on short-term and postoperative defecation function in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) to evaluate its safety and feasibility. Inclusion criteria comprised patients with UC undergoing minimally invasive proctocolectomy at our hospital from May 2014 to May 2023. The TAMIP-IPAA approach involved precise rectal mucosa removal while preserving the sphincter muscle during laparoscopic transanal manipulation. In the evaluation of short-term outcomes for 71 patients undergoing proctocolectomy, the TAMIP group (37 patients) outperformed the non-TAMIP group in operative time (395 vs. 289 min, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (12 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). Additionally, TAMIP-IPAA demonstrated advantages over traditional IPAA (seven patients), in operative time (443 vs. 289 min, p = 0.006), intraoperative blood loss (392 vs. 130 mL, p = 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (18 vs. 8 days, p = 0.003), anastomotic leakage (42.9% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.041), and re-admission within 30 days (57.1% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.009). Wexner scores were significantly superior in the TAMIP-IPAA group at 6 months (14.5 vs. 8.0 points, p = 0.029) and 1 year post stoma closure (14.0 vs. 7.0 points, p = 0.020), indicating enhanced short-term outcomes and defecation function compared to traditional IPAA. TAMIP-IPAA for UC has the potential to offer promising benefits, including the enhancement of short-term outcomes and the improvement of defecation function.

Nutritional management after necrotizing enterocolitis and focal intestinal perforation in preterm infants.

Nutritional management of preterm infants recovering from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or focal intestinal perforation (FIP) is challenging, especially in infants managed surgically. The logistics of how, when, and what to feed are unclear and current nutritional practices are primarily based on physiological principles and consensus opinion in individual units, rather than high-quality evidence. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the literature on nutritional management after NEC or FIP in preterm infants: when to restart enteral nutrition, type of enteral nutrition to use, and how to advance nutrition. We also discuss treatment of micronutrient deficiencies, cholestasis, replacement of stoma losses, and optimal time of stoma closure. In conclusion, there are insufficient high-quality studies available to provide evidence-based recommendations on the best nutritional practice after NEC or FIP in preterm infants. A local or national consensus based early nutrition guideline agreed upon by a multidisciplinary team including pediatric surgeons, pediatricians/neonatologists, nurses, and nutritionists is recommended. Further studies are urgently needed. IMPACT: There is no good quality evidence or nutritional standard across neonatal units treating infants after medical or surgical NEC or FIP. With this review we hope to start providing some consistency across patients and between providers treating patients with NEC and FIP. Mother's own milk is recommended when restarting enteral nutrition after NEC or FIP. In the absence of high-quality evidence, a consensus based early nutrition guideline agreed upon by a multidisciplinary team is recommended. Nutritional research projects are urgently needed in NEC and FIP patients.

An Institutional Shift from Routine to Selective Diversion of Low Anastomosis in Robotic TME Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Using the KHANS Technique: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.

(1) Background: In recent years, there has been a change in practice for diverting stomas in rectal cancer surgery, shifting from routine diverting stomas to a more selective approach. Studies suggest that the benefits of temporary ileostomies do not live up to their risks, such as high-output stomas, stoma dysfunction, and reoperation. (2) Methods: All rectal cancer patients treated with a robotic resection in a single tertiary colorectal centre in the UK from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. In 2015, our unit made a shift to a more selective approach to temporary diverting ileostomies. The cohort was divided into a routine diversion group treated before 2015 and a selective diversion group treated after 2015. Both groups were analysed and compared for short-term outcomes and morbidities. (3) Results: In group A, 63/70 patients (90%) had a diverting stoma compared to 98/135 patients (72.6%) in group B (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the groups in anastomotic leakages (11.8% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.312) or other complications (p = 0.117). There were also no significant differences in readmission (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.312) or reoperation (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.000) after stoma closure. After 1 year, 71.6% and 71.9% (p = 1.000) of patients were stoma-free. One major reason for the delay in stoma reversal was the COVID-19 pandemic, which only occurred in group B (0% vs. 22%, p = 0.054). (4) Conclusions: A more selective approach to diverting stomas for robotic rectal cancer patients does not lead to more complications or leaks and can be considered in the treatment of rectal cancer tumours.

Early versus late closure of protective loop ileostomy: functional significant results in a preliminary analysis.

Protective loop ileostomy (PLI), commonly performed in rectal cancer surgery, is one of the most reliable methods to reduce the risk of sepsis associated with anastomotic complications. The correct timing of PLI closure is not well defined. Recently, most surgeons proposed to close early the PLI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the timing of stoma closure on postoperative outcomes. We analyzed prospectively data of patients who received PLI anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2020 to June 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the timing of stoma closure, until four weeks (EC group) and more than four weeks (LC group). Outpatient clinic follow-up, perioperative data, postoperative complications and evidence of anterior resection syndrome with the Low-Anterior Resection Score (LARS) score were recorded. In the EC group 24 patients were included while 27 patients were considered for LC group. There were no differences between the groups with respect to all parameters, except for recourse to adjuvant therapy, higher for LC group. Perioperative analyzed characteristics were similar among groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the EC group and the LC group for complication rate. LARS score was higher in the LC group for score >20 and >30. Timing of PLI closure was not a significant independent predictor of post-closure complications rate. LARS incidence was significantly related to longer time of closure, with probably late recovery of motility function, but this should be confirmed by randomized studies.

Indications for Stoma Creation and Early Outcome Predictors of Stoma Closure at Universtiy of Dodoma Teaching Hospitals

Background: In advanced and developing countries stomas are commonly applied to clients, which can either be colostomy or ileostomy. These stomas are associated with post operative complications which might be the causal factors for the morbidity and mortality to our surgical patients. This study focus and analyse the indications of stoma creation, it also explores early outcome predictors of stoma closure. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the indications for stoma creation and early outcome predictors of stoma closure. Methodology: The study was prospective, descriptive cross-sectional done at BMH, DRRH and IRRH from June 2021 to August 2022. The structured questionnaire was used as a tool for data collection. The information was obtained from patients, case notes or register book. Convenient sampling technique was used to select clients. Clavien-Dindo tool was used for grading severity of post-operative complications, chi-square, binary and multivariate logistic regression were used to establish association between predictor and outcome variables. SPSS was used for analysis. Results: A total of 194 subjects were enrolled in this study. There were 140 males (72.2%) and 54 females (27.8%) with male to female ratio of 3:1. Colostomy was the leading type of stoma created at 133 (68.6%) followed by ileostomy 61 (31.4%). Commonest indications for colostomy were sigmoid volvulus 75 (56.4%) and colo-rectal carcinoma 43 (32.3%). Ileostomy was commonly indicated in enteric perforation 24 (39.4%) and ileal trauma 20 (32.8%). Overall post-stoma closure complications were noted in 78 (40.2%), colostomy contributed by 60 (30.9%) and ileostomy at 18 (9.3%). The noted post-operative complications were deep &amp; organ/space SSI 52 (26.8%), AL &amp; ECF 21 (10.8%) and IO 05 (2.6%). Clavien-Dindo tool showed 78 (40.2%) unfavorable and 08 (4.1%) favorable outcomes. Binary logistic regression showed predictors of complications to be blood transfusion (p&lt;0.001), hypo-albuminemia (p&lt;0.001) and colostomy closure (p=0.041). Multivariate logistic regression showed hypo-albuminemia (p=0.002) a significant early outcome predictor of stoma closure. Conclusion: Hypo-albuminemia was shown to be important prognostic indicator for complications following stoma closure. The stomas were commonly indicated in sigmoid volvulus and enteric ileal perforation, and predominant post stoma closure complications were surgical site infection (SSI). Clavien-Dindo scoring system was also shown to be effective for grading severity of post-operative complications.

Diverticulitis Surgery Outcomes: Insights from Our Clinical Practice

Aim: To assess outcomes of diverticulitis surgery, focusing on various patient phases at a tertiary center and incorporating literature insights. Materials and Method: Analysis included diverticular disease surgeries at *** University's General Surgery Clinic over five years, examining demographics, disease specifics, surgical details, stoma aspects, and complications. Patients were categorized into emergency and elective groups for comparison based on Hinchey scores and stoma status. Results: Of the patients, 72% were male, with an average age of 58.46. The sigmoid colon was predominantly affected (84%). Percutaneous drainage was used preoperatively in 44%, and 56% required a stoma, primarily Hartmann colostomies (36%). The median stoma closure time was 5 months, with 10 patients unable to have their stoma closed. Emergency surgeries were associated with higher Hinchey stages (III-IV) and an increased need for stoma creation (81% vs. 16% in elective surgeries). Conclusion: The study indicates a median 5-month duration for stoma reversal, with sigmoid colon being the common site regardless of gender. Emergency surgeries showed a higher rate of stoma creation, suggesting elective surgeries could reduce stoma necessity. Further investigation is needed for broader applicability.

Impact of pandemic and socioeconomic influences on decision-making for emergency ostomy procedures: Key factors affecting hospital visit decisions.

Emergency surgeries are linked with increased morbidity and reduced life expectancy, often associated with low socioeconomic status, limited access to healthcare, and delayed hospital admissions. While the influence of socioeconomic status on elective surgery outcomes is well-established, its impact on emergency surgeries, including ostomy creation and closure, is less clear. This study aimed to explore how the pandemic and socioeconomic status affect emergency ostomy procedures, seeking to determine which has a greater effect. It emphasizes the importance of considering socioeconomic factors in patient care pathways for ostomy procedures. A total of 542 patients who underwent emergency ostomy formation between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. The pre-pandemic and pandemic periods were compared between themselves and against each other. Demographic data (age and sex), comorbidities, socioeconomic status, etiology of the primary disease, type of surgery, stoma type, length of hospital stay, ostomy closure time, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed for all patients. In total, 290 (53%) patients underwent surgery during the pandemic period, whereas 252 (47%) underwent surgery during the pre-pandemic period. Emergency surgery was performed for malignancy in 366 (67%) patients. The number of days patients underwent ostomy closure was significantly higher in the low-income group (P = .038, 95% CI: 293,2, 386-945). The risk of failure of stoma closure was 3-fold (95% CI: 1.8-5.2) in patients with metastasis. The risk of mortality was 12.4-fold (95% CI: 6.5-23.7) when there was failure of stoma closure. When compared to pandemic period, the mortality risk was 6.3-fold (95% CI: 3.9-10.2) in pre-pandemic period. Pandemic patients had a shorter hospital stay than before the pandemic (P = .044). A high socioeconomic status was significantly associated with early hospital admission for ostomy closure, and lower probability of mortality. More metastases and perforations were observed during the pandemic period and mortality was increased during pandemic and in patients without ostomy closure. The socioeconomic status lost its effect in cases of emergency ostomy creation and had no impact on length of hospital stay in either the pre-pandemic or pandemic period.