Steroid-dependent Minimal Change Disease Research Articles

Steroid-Dependent Minimal Change Disease in an Adult Responsive to Rituximab

Steroid-Dependent Minimal Change Disease in an Adult Responsive to Rituximab

#5801 EXTENDED LOW DOSE RITUXIMAB REGIMEN FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH STEROID-DEPENDENT AND FREQUENTLY RELAPSING MINIMAL CHANGE DISEASE

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent minimal change disease (MCD) imply a therapeutic challenge for nephrologists. The use of steroid sparing agents such as cyclosporine, rituximab and mycophenolate, allows minimization of steroids exposure among these patients. In children and adults, Rituximab has demonstrated safety and efficacy in some studies although there is no established treatment regimen. This study aims to demonstrate that a low dose extended regimen of rituximab is an effective alternative for preventing relapses among these patients. Method This is a single-centre retrospective descriptive study of a case series of adult MCD patients from Ramón y Cajal’ Hospital in Madrid, Spain. Since 2019, patients with steroids-dependent or frequently relapsing MCD were treated with a low dose extended protocol of Rituximab as follows; 500 mg of rituximab once remission is achieved with steroid therapy, and four additional doses at month +6, +18 and +30 during the follow-up. Relapse free survival was analyzed after rituximab therapy. Results Eight patients with a median age of 42 years (22–70 years) who received at least one dose of intravenous rituximab were included. Four of the patients (50%) had previously received additional immunosuppressive regimens (including cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil cyclosporine, mycophenolate or ACTH). Two of them (25%) had frequent relapses and the remaining six (75%) had steroid-dependent behaviour. After a median of 2 years (IQR, 1,4-3,3) of follow-up, 6 out of 8 (75%) patients stayed under remission, experiencing the remaining two one relapse at one month and at one year, respectively, after the first rituximab dose. Comparing relapses during the two years-period before and after rituximab use, the median relapse rate per patient dropped from 2.8 (IQR, 2-4) to 0.5 (IQR, 0-1; P = 0.001) (Fig. 1). No patient experienced rituximab related side effects nor infections during the study period. Conclusion In MCD patients, the administration of rituximab in an extended low-dose regimen as corticosteroid-sparing therapy appears to be safe and effective in most of the patients for preventing relapses. This regimen allows minimization exposure to rituximab as well as disease remission during a longer period of time.

Rituximab Therapy for Adults with Nephrotic Syndromes: Standard Schedules or B Cell-Targeted Therapy?

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. It acts mainly through complement-dependent cytotoxicity on B cells expressing the CD20 marker. In this review, we analyse the efficacy and possible pitfalls of rituximab to treat nephrotic syndromes by taking into account pharmacological considerations and CD19 marker testing utility. Despite the fact that the drug has been in use for years, efficacy and treatment schedules in adults with nephrotic syndrome are still a matter of debate. Clinical trials have proven the efficacy and safety of rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Data from observational studies also showed the efficacy of rituximab in minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Rituximab use is now widely recommended by new Kidney Disease Improved Outcome (KDIGO) guidelines in membranous nephropathy and in frequent-relapsing, steroid-dependent minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. However, rituximab response has a large interindividual variability. One reason could be that rituximab is lost in the urine at a higher extent in patients with nonselective nephrotic proteinuria, exposing patients to different rituximab plasma levels. Moreover, the association between CD19+ levels and clinical response or relapses is not always present, making the use of this marker in clinical practice complex. High resolution flow cytometry has increased the capability of detecting residual CD19+ B cells. Moreover, it can identify specific B-cell subsets (including IgG-switched memory B cells), which can repopulate at different rates. Its wider use could become a useful tool for better understanding reasons of rituximab failure or avoiding unnecessary retreatments.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult frequent-relapsing or steroid-dependent minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in adult frequent-relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent (SD) nephrotic syndrome (NS), including minimal change disease (MCD) or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), are still inconclusive.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019148102) by pooling data of cohort studies or case series on adult patients with difficult-to-treat NS. Steroid-resistant NS was excluded. The primary outcomes were the complete remission (CR) rate and the relapse rate. Partial remission (PR) rate, no response (NR) rate and adverse events were the secondary outcomes. A random-effects model was performed for all the outcomes. ResultsWe included 21 studies involving 382 adult MCD/FSGS subjects with a median follow-up duration from 12 to 43 months. RTX treatment induced a pooled 84.2% CR rate [95% confidence interval (CI): 67.7–96.3%], while MCD patients had a high 91.6% CR rate and FSGS patients a moderate 43% CR rate. However, 27.4% (95% CI 20.7–34.5%) of the patients relapsed during the follow-up. The pooled PR and NR rates were 5.8% (95% CI 1.2–12.5%) and 5.2% (95% CI 0.0–15.0%), respectively. RTX was associated with trivial adverse events and good tolerance.ConclusionsIn summary, by pooling results of current pilot studies, RTX may be an effective and relatively safe alternative for most adult FR or SD MCD/FSGS to displace calcineurin inhibitors or prednisone in the hierarchy of treatment. More clinical trials comparing RTX with other immunosuppressants and concerning the long-term adverse events are needed.

Comparison of treatment options in adults with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent minimal change disease

Studies comparing all treatment options for frequently-relapsing/steroid-dependent (FR/SD) minimal change disease (MCD) in adults are lacking. Medical records of 76 adults with FR/SD MCD who were treated with corticosteroids as the first-line therapy were reviewed. Treatment options were compared for the time to relapse, change of therapy and progression (relapse on full-dose treatment). Second-line treatments included rituximab (RTX; n = 13), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 12), calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; n = 26) and cyclophosphamide (CTX; n = 16). During the second-line treatments, 48 (71.6%) patients relapsed at median 17 (range 2-100) months. The majority of relapses occurred during dose tapering or off drug. Twenty of 65 (30.8%) changed therapy after the first relapse. The median time to relapse after the second line was 66 versus 28 months in RTX versus non-RTX groups (P = 0.170). The median time to change of treatment was 66 and 44 months, respectively (P = 0.060). Last-line treatment options included RTX (n = 8), MMF (n = 4), CNI (n = 3) and CTX (n = 2). Seven (41.2%) patients had a relapse during the last-line treatment at median 39 (range 5-112) months. The median time to relapse was 48 versus 34 months in the RTX versus non-RTX groups (P = 0.727). One patient in the RTX group died presumably of heart failure. No major adverse event was observed. During the median follow-up of 81 (range 9-355) months, no patients developed end-stage renal disease. Relapse is frequent in MCD in adults. Patients treated with RTX may be less likely to require a change of therapy and more likely to come off immunosuppressive drugs.

Study of adults with relapsing and steroid-dependent minimal change disease, comparing the effectiveness of prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg to standard dose prednisolone 1 mg/kg in the treatment of relapses

The purpose of this study is to identify if 0.5 mg/kg daily prednisolone is equivalent to 1 mg/kg daily prednisolone in the induction of remission in adults who have experienced a relapse, and if this impacts on future episodes of relapses and overall steroid burden. Patients included were those

Effective treatment with rituximab for the maintenance of remission in frequently relapsing minimal change disease.

AimTreatment of frequently relapsing or steroid‐dependent minimal change disease (MCD) in children and adults remains challenging. Glucocorticoids and/or other immunosuppressive agents are the mainstay of treatment, but patients often experience toxicity from prolonged exposure and may either become treatment dependent and/or resistant. Increasing evidence suggests that rituximab (RTX) can be a useful alternative to standard immunosuppression and allow withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppressants; however, data on optimal treatment regimens, long‐term efficacy and safety are still limited.MethodsWe undertook a prospective study of RTX to allow immunosuppression minimization in 15 young adults with frequently relapsing or steroid‐dependent, biopsy‐proven MCD. All patients were in remission at the start of treatment and on a calcineurin inhibitor. Two doses of RTX (1 gr) were given 6 months apart. A subset of patients also received an additional dose 12 months later, in order to examine the benefit of re‐treatment. Biochemical and clinical parameters were monitored over an extended follow‐up period of up to 43 months.ResultsMedian steroid‐free survival after RTX was 25 months (range 4–34). Mean relapse frequency decreased from 2.60 ± 0.28 to 0.4 ± 0.19 (P < 0.001) after RTX. Seven relapses occurred, five of which (71%) when CD19 counts were greater than 100 µ. Immunoglobulin levels remained unchanged, and no major side effects were observed throughout the follow‐up period.ConclusionsRituximab therapy is effective at maintaining prolonged steroid‐free remission and reducing relapse frequency in this group of patients. Our study lends further support for the role of RTX in the treatment of patients with frequently relapsing or steroid‐dependent MCD.

Rituximab use in adult primary glomerulopathy: where is the evidence?

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 antibody that results in depletion of B-cell lymphocytes. It is currently used in the treatment of a variety of autoimmune diseases, in addition to CD20-positive lymphomas. The use of rituximab in the treatment of the adult primary glomerular diseases has emerged recently, although not yet established as first-line therapy in international guidelines. In patients with steroid-dependent minimal change disease or frequently relapsing disease, and in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), several retrospective and prospective studies support the use of rituximab to induce remission, whereas in idiopathic focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), the use of rituximab has resulted in variable results. Evidence is still lacking for the use of rituximab in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), as only few reports used rituximab in these two entities. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted and clearly needed to establish the definitive role of rituximab in the management of steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing minimal change disease, IMN, both as first-line and second-line treatment, and in MPGN. We await the results of an ongoing RCT of rituximab use in IgAN. Although current evidence for the use of rituximab in patients with idiopathic FSGS is poor, more RCTs are needed to clarify its role, if any, in the management of steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent FSGS.

Nephrotic syndrome; is rituximab the light at the end of the tunnel in the treatment of adult steroid-dependent minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis?

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education: Reports on patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome and underlying minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis have shown promising results. There is a strong need for more trials conducted in a prospective, controlled manner to clearly recommend rituximab therapy in this indication on a regular basis.

Frequent-relapsing, steroid-dependent minimal change disease: is rituximab the answer?

In patients with minimal change disease, development of steroid-dependency or frequent relapses pose difficult therapeutic problems. Prolonged administration of corticosteroids or the use of additional immunosuppressive therapy can result in significant toxicity. Recent data point to the use of rituximab as an important treatment option to induce long-term remission in patients with minimal change diseases who are either frequent relapsers or require significant immunosuppression to remain in remission. Minimal change disease (MCD) accounts for the majority of cases of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children and up to 20% of cases of idiopathic NS in white adults [1]. On kidney biopsy, MCD is characterized by widespread effacement of epithelial cell foot processes on electron microscopy, while glomeruli appear normal on light microscopy and immunoglobulin and complement deposition are absent on immunofluorescence. Most cases of MCD are idiopathic, although drugs (such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), hematological malignancies (mainly Hodgkin lymphoma) and thymoma are well-recognized causes of secondary MCD. While most patients respond to corticosteroid therapy, up to 25% of treated patients have frequent relapses and up to 30% of patients become steroid dependent [2, 3]. In these patients, alternative therapies aimed at minimizing corticosteroid toxicity have been used, including alkylating agents, antimetabolites and calcineurin inhibitors. While these agents may be beneficial, some patients respond poorly or not all, and their use may be complicated by the development of serious adverse effects, e.g., infertility and malignancy with the use of cyclophosphamide. With calcineurin inhibitors, steroid de

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in treatment of steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant adult onset minimal change disease

To observe the efficacy and safety of leflunomide combined with prednisone therapy (LEF therapy) in the treatment of patients with adult onset steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant minimal change disease (MCD). 16 MCD patients who had been treated with LEF therapy were retrospectively analyzed. 87.5% (14/16) of the patients were steroid-dependent and 12.5% (2/16) of the patients were steroid-resistant. The initial dose of LEF was 10 - 20 mg/day combined with prednisone 0.25 - 1.0 mg/kg/day, gradually tapering after 8 weeks. Clinical and laboratory data at baseline, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 24th, and 48th week were analyzed compared with initial course of prednisone monotherapy (PRED monotherapy) and cyclophosphamide combined with prednisone therapy (CTX therapy). All the 16 patients achieved different levels of remission in LEF therapy. 93.8% (15/16) of the patients, including the two steroid-resistant patients, achieved complete remission. During the treatment, 8 patients had adverse effects which could be well tolerated. Compared LEF therapy with PRED monotherapy (n = 16), the dose of prednisone to maintain remission was reduced (from median 22.5 mg/day to median 7.5 mg/day, p = 0.041); relapse rate during the follow-up decreased from 100% to 31.3% (p = 0.002); the median time before relapse increased from 20.3 weeks to 32.5 weeks. Compared LEF therapy with CTX therapy (n = 12), the dose of prednisone to maintain remission was reduced significantly (from median 22.5 mg/day to median 5.0 mg/day, p = 0.003); relapse rate during the follow-up decreased from 100% to 31.3% (p = 0.001); the median time before relapse increased from 11.7 weeks to 32.5 weeks. LEF therapy seems to be effective in steroid-resistant and steroiddependent MCD. This therapy may reduce the amount of prednisone to maintain remission and reduce the relapse rate compared with PRED monothrerapy and CTX therapy. LEF therapy was usually well tolerated.

Rituximab is an efficient and safe treatment in adults with steroid-dependent minimal change disease

Development of steroid dependency in patients with nephrotic syndrome may require a long-term multi-drug therapy at risk of drug toxicity and renal failure. Rituximab treatment reduces the steroid dosage and the need for immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric patients. Here we retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult patients with steroid-dependent minimal change disease. To do this, we analyzed the outcome of all adult patients treated with rituximab for steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome over a mean follow-up of 29.5 months (range 5.1-82 months). Seventeen patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome, unresponsive to several immunosuppressive medications, were treated with rituximab. Eleven patients had no relapses after rituximab infusion (mean follow-up 26.7 months, range 5.1-82 months) and nine of them were able to come off all other immunosuppressive drugs and steroids during follow-up. Six patients relapsed at least once after a mean time of 11.9 months (mean follow-up 34.5 months, range 16.9-50.1 months), but their immunosuppressive drug treatment could be stopped or markedly reduced during this time. No adverse events were recorded. Thus, rituximab is efficient and safe in adult patients suffering from severe steroid-dependent minimal change disease. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this study.