Abstract OBJECTIVES Describe the first experience in this technically challenging procedure RESULTS on morbidity INTRODUCTION Awake craniotomy allows for maximal safe resection and lower incidence of adverse events. Nonetheless, it represents a technical challenge. METHODS We enroll forty patients, 18 women, and 22 men. Due to the lack of a navigation system, craniometrics points became paramount to craniotomy planning. Ultrasound is used to compensate for brain shift and confirm the tumor's exact location. We engaged in cortical and subcortical mapping and clinical evaluation of motor and sensory functions. Linguistic tests were applied. The first 24 hours are in the ICU, and an MRI is obtained. RESULTS The mean age was 51, and the mean Karfnosky scale was 80. The median size was 12 cm3. Locations were: Thirteen precentral gyri. Ten insular cortex. Eight cingulate gyri. Six supplementary motor gyri Two Supramarginal gyri. One paracentral lobe tumor. Four patients had obese morbidity, three had depression, and two had a midline displacement treated with steroids. Intraoperative, we encountered three seizures managed with cold saline, two speech arrest, and one transient hand motor deficit. Post-op adverse events were one central facial paralysis, one upper limb, and one lower limb paresthesias; all improved after 72 hours. The median length of stay is 48 hours. The median extent of resection is 93%. The mean KPS was 80 at discharge. We undertook a median of 18 months follow-up. 38 Glioblastomas(GMB) and 2 Low-Grade Gliomas(LGG) were found. The standard oncology treatment was Temozolomide and stereotaxic radiosurgery(SRS). The median time from surgery to SRS was 4.3 months. The median SRS marginal and maximal dose were 15Gy and 26Gy. The median overall survival(OS) was sixteen months, and the Progression-free survival(PFS) was ten months. CONCLUSION An awake craniotomy without the navigation system is possible; however, careful planning is essential.