Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Patients Research Articles

Real-world Decision-making Process for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Lung Cancer Patients.

To generate a prediction model for selection of treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are used in the local treatment of early-stage NSCLC. However, selection of patients for either SBRT or MIS remains challenging, due to the multitude of factors influencing the decision-making process. We analyzed 1291 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with intended MIS or SBRT from January 2020 to July 2023. A prediction model for selection for SBRT was created based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis stratified the cohort into 3 treatment-related risk categories. Post-procedural outcomes, recurrence and overall survival (OS) were investigated to assess the performance of the model. In total, 1116 patients underwent MIS and 175 SBRT. The prediction model included age, performance status, previous pulmonary resection, MSK-Frailty score, FEV1 and DLCO, and demonstrated an area-under-the-curve of 0.908 (95%CI, 0.876-0.938). Based on the probability scores (n=1197), patients were stratified into a low-risk (MIS, n=970 and SBRT, n=28), intermediate-risk (MIS, n=96 and SBRT, n=53) and high-risk category (MIS, n=10 and SBRT, n=40). Treatment modality was not associated with OS (HR of SBRT, 1.67 [95%CI: 0.80-3.48]; P=0.20). Clinical expertise can be translated into a robust predictive model, guiding the selection of stage I NSCLC patients for MIS versus SBRT and effectively categorizing them into three distinct risk groups. Patients in the intermediate category could benefit most from multidisciplinary evaluation.

Lung SBRT: Dose gradient optimization based on target size

This study investigated optimization settings that steepen the dose gradient as a function of target size for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Sixty-eight lung SBRT patients with planning target volumes (PTVs) ranging from 2-203 cc were categorized into small (<20 cc), medium (20-50 cc), and large (>50 cc) groups. VMAT plans were generated using the normal tissue objective (NTO) to penalize the dose gradient at progressively steeper NTO fall-off values (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 mm-1). Dose was calculated using the AcurosXB algorithm and was normalized so the prescription dose covered 95% of the PTV. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests were used to assess for statistical differences in the Conformity Index at the 50% isodose level (CI50%), global maximum dose (Dmax), and monitor units (MU) across the various NTO settings. All plans adhered to institutional criteria and met the guidelines of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0813. Steeper NTO fall-off values significantly increased Dmax and MUs across all groups (p < 0.05). CI50% significantly differed with fall-off values in small (0.3 mm-1) and medium (0.2 mm-1) targets, indicating steeper NTO fall-off values improve CI50% for small and medium targets (p < 0.05). Large targets showed no significant CI50% difference across these fall-off values. As target size increases, the importance of fall-off values in achieving an acceptable CI50% diminishes. Smaller targets benefit from steeper fall-off values despite increased Dmax and MUs. Consideration of fall-off value relative to target size is crucial to limit dose spillage outside the target.

Cumulative rib fracture risk after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionRib fracture is a known complication after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Patient-related parameters are essential to provide patient-tailored risk estimation, however, their impact on rib fracture is less documented compared to dosimetric parameters. This study aimed to predict the risk of rib fractures in patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) post-SBRT based on both patient-related and dosimetric parameters with death as a competing risk. Materials and methodsIn total, 602 patients with localized NSCLC treated with SBRT between 2010–2020 at Odense University Hospital, Denmark were included. All patients received SBRT with 45–66 Gray (Gy)/3 fractions. Rib fractures were identified in CT-scans using a word embedding model. The cumulative incidence function was based on cause-specific Cox hazard models with variable selection based on cross-validation model likelihood performed using 50 bootstraps. ResultsIn total, 19 % of patients experienced a rib fracture. The cumulative risk of rib fracture increased rapidly from 6-54 months post-SBRT. Female gender, bone density, near max dose to the rib, V30 and V40 to the rib, gross tumor volume, and mean lung dose were significantly associated with rib fracture risk in univariable analysis. The final multi-variable model consisted of V20 and V30 to the rib and mean lung dose. ConclusionFemale gender and low bone density in male patients are significant predictors of rib fracture risk. The final model predicting cumulative rib fracture risk of 19 % in patients with localized NSCLC treated with SBRT contained no patient-related parameters, suggesting that dosimetric parameters are the primary drivers.

Nivolumab with or without Ipilimumab Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of nivolumab with/without ipilimumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with pretreated metastatic biliary tract cancer (mBTC). The study was a phase 2 randomized trial with Simon's optimal two-stage design requiring 36 evaluable patients per group after second stage. Sixty-one patients were included from September 2018 to January 2022 and randomized (1:1) to receive SBRT (15 Gy × 1 on day 1 to a primary or metastatic lesion) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 2 weeks) with/without ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 6 weeks). Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease. Decision to continue accrual into the second stage depended on the CBR from the first stage. Forty-two patients received SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab with a CBR of 31.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.6-47.1]. Five patients (11.9%) achieved partial response with median duration of 4.4 months (range, 1.1-21.5). Nineteen patients received SBRT/nivolumab. This group was closed after the initial stage based on a CBR of 10.5% (95% CI, 1.3-33.1). Adverse events were graded with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (31%) and 3 (16%) patients in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab and SBRT/nivolumab groups, respectively. One patient died from immune-related hepatitis in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab group. Combining SBRT, nivolumab, and ipilimumab is well tolerated, feasible, and shows response in a subgroup of patients with mBTC.

Robust optimization of the Gross Tumor Volume compared to conventional Planning Target Volume-based planning in photon Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of lung tumors.

Robust optimization has been suggested as an approach to reduce the irradiated volume in lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). We performed a retrospective planning study to investigate the potential benefits over Planning Target Volume (PTV)-based planning. Thirty-nine patients had additional plans using robust optimization with 5-mm isocenter shifts of the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) created in addition to the PTV-based plan used for treatment. The optimization included the mid-position phase and the extreme breathing phases of the 4D-CT planning scan. The plans were compared for tumor coverage, isodose volumes, and doses to Organs At Risk (OAR). Additionally, we evaluated both plans with respect to observed tumor motion using the peak tumor motion seen on the planning scan and cone-beam CTs. Statistically significant reductions in irradiated isodose volumes and doses to OAR were achieved with robust optimization, while preserving tumor dose. The reductions were largest for the low-dose volumes and reductions up to 188 ccm was observed. The robust evaluation based on observed peak tumor motion showed comparable target doses between the two planning methods. Accumulated mean GTV-dose was increased by a median of 4.46 Gy and a non-significant increase of 100 Monitor Units (MU) was seen in the robust optimized plans. The robust plans required more time to prepare, and while it might not be a feasible planning strategy for all lung SBRT patients, we suggest it might be useful for selected patients.

Surgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Stage I Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 25-Year Experience

ObjectivesSmall-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is usually a wide-spread, highly-lethal malignancy but occasionally presents as localized, limited stage cancer amenable to local treatment. We reviewed our experience using surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to assess safety, survival rates and treatment toxicity in clinical stage I SCLC patients. Materials and MethodsElectronic medical records of patients with clinical stage I lymph node-negative SCLC who underwent surgical resection or SBRT between 1996 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model was constructed. ResultsOf 96 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 77 underwent resection and 19 underwent SBRT. Surgical patients were younger (mean 68.4 ± 9.2 years surgery versus 74.3 ± 6.6 years SBRT, P = .005) and had better pulmonary function (81.5 ± 19.6 FEV1% of predicted surgery versus 44.0 ± 20.9% SBRT, P < .001). SBRT patients had significantly more comorbidities. For both cohorts, 59 tumors were pure SCLC and 37 were mixed SCLC/NSCLC histology. Median survivals were 21 months versus 31 months for SBRT and surgery patients respectively (P = .07). There were no treatment-related mortalities. Mean length of hospital stay for surgical patients was 5.4 ± 5.7 days. Survival was longer in lymph node-negative surgery patients (median 48 months node-negative versus 19 months node-positive, P = .04). For node-negative-surgery patients, the estimated 2- and 5-year survival rates are 60% and 48%. ConclusionsOur single-institutional experience over 25 years demonstrates that local treatment with surgery or SBRT for clinical stage I SCLC is safe and effective, with survivals lower than similar stage non–small-cell carcinoma patients. However, our results compare favorably with prior small-cell surgical series and far better than reported results of chemoradiotherapy for similar stage patients, thereby validating current recommendations for employing surgery or SBRT for stage I SCLC.

Evaluating intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-hold.

To evaluate the intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and to investigate the adequacy of the current planning target volume (PTV) margins. Twenty-eight lung SBRT patients with DIBH were selected in this study. Among the lesions, twenty-three were at right or left lower lobe, two at right middle lobe, and three at right or left upper lobe. Post-treatment gated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was acquired to quantify the intra-fractional tumor shift at each treatment. These obtained shifts were then used to calculate the required PTV margin, which was compared with the current applied margin of 5mm margin in anterior-posterior (AP) and right-left (RL) directions and 8mm in superior-inferior (SI) direction. The beam delivery time was prolonged with DIBH. The actual beam delivery time with DIBH (Tbeam_DIBH) was compared with the beam delivery time without DIBH (Tbeam_wo_DIBH) for the corresponding SBRT plan. A total of 113 treatments were analyzed. At six treatments (5.3%), the shifts exceeded the tolerance defined by the current PTV margin. The average shifts were 0.0±1.9mm, 0.1±1.5mm, and -0.5±3.7mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The required PTV margins were determined to be 4.5, 3.9, and 7.4mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The average Tbeam_wo_DIBH and Tbeam_DIBH were 2.4±0.4 min and 3.6±1.5 min, respectively. The average treatment slot for lung SBRT with DIBH was 25.3±7.9 min. Intra-fractional tumor motion is the predominant source of treatment uncertainties in CBCT-guided lung SBRT with DIBH. The required PTV margin should be determined based on data specific to each institute, considering different techniques and populations. Our data indicate that our current applied PTV margin is adequate, and it is possible to reduce further in the RL direction. The time increase of Tbeam_DIBH, relative to the treatment slot, is not clinically significant.

Dynamic liver volume change in predicting hepatic decompensation and long-term effects of stereotactic body radiation therapy.

This study aimed to investigate the association between liver volume change and hepatic decompensation and compare the risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A retrospective review of SBRT-treated HCC and compensated LC without HCC patients was conducted. Liver volume was measured using auto-segmentation software on liver dynamic computed tomography scans. The decompensation event was defined as the first occurrence of refractory ascites, esophageal variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. We evaluated the association between the rate of liver volume decrease and hepatic decompensation and compared decompensation events between the SBRT and LC cohorts using propensity score matching. A total of 138 patients from the SBRT cohort and 488 from the LC cohort were analyzed. The rate of liver volume decrease was associated with the risk of decompensation events in both cohorts. The 3-year rate of decompensation events was significantly higher in the group with a liver volume decreasing rate>7%/year compared with the group with a rate<7%/year. In the propensity score-matched cohort, the 3-year rate of decompensation events after a single session of SBRT was not significantly different from that in the LC cohort. The rate of liver volume decrease was significantly associated with the risk of hepatic decompensation in both HCC patients who received SBRT and LC patients. A single session of SBRT for HCC did not result in a higher decompensation rate compared with LC.

Assessment of stereotactic high-resolution detectors for stereotactic body radiotherapy: comparative analysis between myQA® SRS and Gafchromic EBT-XD films.

The study aimed to evaluate dosimetry systems used for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), specifically 2D array dosimetry and film dosimetry systems, for exploring their characteristics and clinical suitability. For this, high-resolution myQA SRS detectors and Gafchromic EBT-XD films were employed. Film analysis included net optical density (OD) values depending on energy, dose rate, scanner orientation, scanning side, and post-exposure growth. For myQA SRS, signal values were evaluated in terms of dose rate (400-1400 MU/min) and angular dependence (0-180° at 30° intervals) along with couch angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Pre-treatment verification included 32 SBRT patients for whom myQA SRS results were compared with those obtained with Gafchromic EBT-XD films. Analysis revealed less than 1% deviation in net OD for energy and dose rate dependence. Scanner orientation caused 2.5% net OD variation, with minimal differences between film front and back scan orientations (variance < 1.0%). A rapid OD rise occurred within six hours post-exposure, followed by gradual increase. The myQA SRS detector showed -3.7% dose rate dependence (400 MU/min), while the angular dependence at 90° was -26.7%. A correction factor effectively reduced these differences to < 1%. For myQA SRS, gamma passing rates were-93.6% (2%/1mm), while those for EBT-XD films were-92.8%. Improved rates were observed with 3%/1mm: for myQA SRS-97.9%, and for EBT-XD film-98.16%. In contrast, for 2%/2mm with 10% threshold, for myQA SRS-97.7% and for EBT-XD film-98.97% were obtained. It is concluded that both myQA SRS detectors and EBT-XD films are suitable for SBRT pre-treatment verification, ensuring accuracy and reliability. However, myQA SRS detectors are preferred over EBT-XD film due to the fact that they offer real-time measurements and user-friendly features.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Between Thoracoscopic Surgery and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Objective: To compare the risk of death, tumor recurrence, metastasis, and disease progression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with thoracoscopic surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods: Patients who underwent radical surgery and SBRT for NSCLC between April 2010 and November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival outcomes of each patient group. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of death, tumor recurrence, metastasis, and disease progression. Results: A total of 167 patients were enrolled, of whom 75 and 92 underwent SBRT and surgery, respectively. The median follow-up was 45 months (range, 4-105 months). SBRT patients were observed to be significantly older (median, 76.0 vs 67.0 years; P < .001), and associated with significantly higher mortality rate (42.7% vs 26.1%, P = .024). However, no significant difference in overall survival duration was seen between the SBRT and surgery groups (45.0 vs 41.0 months; P = .199). SBRT patients demonstrated significantly lower rates of metastasis (12.0% vs 30.4%, P = .004), and significantly longer metastasis-free survival (39.0 months vs 35.5 months, P = .020). The remaining outcomes, including tumor recurrence and disease progression rates, were similar between the groups. Compared to surgery, SBRT did not significantly associate with death, recurrence, or disease progression. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in overall, tumor recurrence-free, and disease progression-free survival between the groups (log-rank P < .05). Conclusions: SBRT demonstrated similar overall survival compared to radical surgery, and associated with significantly reduced risk of tumor metastasis. Our study thereby suggests SBRT as the best treatment option for patients with inoperable NSCLC.

Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system.

The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric improvements achieved in prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment within the PROMETHEUS and NINJA trials using an in-house real-time position monitoring system, SeedTracker. This study considered a total of 127 prostate SBRT patients treated in the PROMETHEUS (ACTRN12615000223538) and NINJA (ACTRN12618001806257) clinical trials. The SeedTracker position monitoring system was utilized for real-time position monitoring with a 3-mm position tolerance. The doses delivered to the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder were assessed by incorporating the actual target position during treatment. The dose that would have been delivered without monitoring was also assessed by incorporating the observed position deviations. Treatment with position corrections resulted in a mean (range) CTV D99 difference of -0.3 (-1.0 to 0.0) Gy between the planned and delivered dose. Without corrections, this difference would have been -0.6 (-3.7 to 0.0) Gy. Not correcting for position deviations resulted in a statistically significant difference between the planned and delivered CTV D99 (p < 0.05). The mean (range) dose difference between the planned and delivered D2cc of the rectum and bladder for treatment with position corrections was -0.1 (-3.7 to 4.7) Gy and -0.1 (-1.7 to 0.5) Gy, respectively. Without corrections, these differences would have been -0.6 (-6.1 to 4.7) Gy and -0.2 (-2.5 to 0.9) Gy. SeedTracker improved clinical dose volume compliance in prostate SBRT. Without monitoring and corrections, delivered dose would significantly differ from the planned dose.

Standard-of-care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (Consolidative Use of Radiotherapy to Block [CURB] oligoprogression): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study

Most patients with metastatic cancer eventually develop resistance to systemic therapy, with some having limited disease progression (ie, oligoprogression). We aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeting oligoprogressive sites could improve patient outcomes. We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial of SBRT in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after having received at least first-line systemic therapy, with oligoprogression defined as five or less progressive lesions on PET-CT or CT. Patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled from a tertiary cancer centre in New York, NY, USA, and six affiliated regional centres in the states of New York and New Jersey, with a 1:1 randomisation between standard of care (standard-of-care group) and SBRT plus standard of care (SBRT group). Randomisation was done with a computer-based algorithm with stratification by number of progressive sites of metastasis, receptor or driver genetic alteration status, primary site, and type of systemic therapy previously received. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured up to 12 months. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by disease site. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03808662, and is complete. From Jan 1, 2019, to July 31, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care (n=51; 23 patients with breast cancer and 28 patients with NSCLC) or SBRT plus standard of care (n=55; 24 patients with breast cancer and 31 patients with NSCLC). 16 (34%) of 47 patients with breast cancer had triple-negative disease, and 51 (86%) of 59 patients with NSCLC had no actionable driver mutation. The study was closed to accrual before reaching the targeted sample size, after the primary efficacy endpoint was met during a preplanned interim analysis. The median follow-up was 11·6 months for patients in the standard-of-care group and 12·1 months for patients in the SBRT group. The median progression-free survival was 3·2 months (95% CI 2·0-4·5) for patients in the standard-of-care group versus 7·2 months (4·5-10·0) for patients in the SBRT group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·35-0·81; p=0·0035). The median progression-free survival was higher for patients with NSCLC in the SBRT group than for those with NSCLC in the standard-of-care group (10·0 months [7·2-not reached] vs 2·2 months [95% CI 2·0-4·5]; HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·75; p=0·0039), but no difference was found for patients with breast cancer (4·4 months [2·5-8·7] vs 4·2 months [1·8-5·5]; 0·78, 0·43-1·43; p=0·43). Grade 2 or worse adverse events occurred in 21 (41%) patients in the standard-of-care group and 34 (62%) patients in the SBRT group. Nine (16%) patients in the SBRT group had grade 2 or worse toxicities related to SBRT, including gastrointestinal reflux disease, pain exacerbation, radiation pneumonitis, brachial plexopathy, and low blood counts. The trial showed that progression-free survival was increased in the SBRT plus standard-of-care group compared with standard of care only. Oligoprogression in patients with metastatic NSCLC could be effectively treated with SBRT plus standard of care, leading to more than a four-times increase in progression-free survival compared with standard of care only. By contrast, no benefit was observed in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer. Further studies to validate these findings and understand the differential benefits are warranted. National Cancer Institute.

Feasibility of fast, four-dimensional computed tomography-based O-ring LINAC plans for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with poor performance status

PurposeWe aimed to retrospectively analyzed the feasibility of fast four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-based O-ring LINAC treatment for patients with an average respiratory amplitude was&amp;lt; 0.5 cm and who cannot endure long treatment times due to poor performance status in lung 4D-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).MethodsThis study included data of 38 patients who received lung 4D-SBRT and had average respiratory amplitude&amp;lt; 0.5 cm in the full phase. C-arm LINAC plans were based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values ranging from 20–70% using a C-arm LINAC. O-ring LINAC plans were retrospectively established based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values of 0–90% using an O-ring LINAC. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and gradient measurement of the planning target volumes (PTV) were analyzed to compare dosimetric data between C-arm LINAC and O-ring LINAC plans. Organs at risk were analyzed in accordance with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0915 protocol. Treatment delivery time and total monitor units were analyzed to compare the efficiency of treatment delivery. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P&amp;lt; 0.05).ResultsFor the PTV, there was no significant difference in the CI or HI between C-arm LINAC and O-ring LINAC plans. For organs-at-risk, all plans met the criteria for dose constraint. There was a significant difference between C-arm LINAC and O-ring LINAC plans except in the spinal cord. Treatment delivery time was 92% longer for C-arm LINAC plans than for O-ring LINAC plans. The total MU value for C-arm LINAC plans was 9.6% higher than that for O-ring LINAC plans.ConclusionWe verified the feasibility of fast 4DCT-based O-ring LINAC treatment for patients with average respiratory amplitude&amp;lt; 0.5 cm and who cannot endure long treatment times due to poor performance status in lung 4D-SBRT.

SBRT vs. Y90: HCC Treatment Outcomes and Costs.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and Yttrium-90 (Y90) are among the ablative therapies used as treatment options for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, direct comparisons of the 2 modalities' outcomes and costs are lacking. This study aimed to analyze demographic, treatment, and cost information for patients with HCC treated with SBRT and Y90. Patients with HCC treated with SBRT or Y90 radioembolization between January 2018 and January 2020 at one institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and treatment data were compared utilizing χ 2 tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were applied to compare overall survival and progression-free survival in different treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to analyze the unadjusted and adjusted survival differences. Ten SBRT and 10 Y90 patients were randomly selected for Medicare cost analysis. Sixty-three patients received Y90, and 21 received SBRT. On univariable and multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between the Y90 and SBRT cohorts. SBRT patients had higher American Joint Committee on Cancer staging ( P =0.039), greater tumor size (4.07 vs. 2.96cm, P =0.013), and greater rates of prior liver-directed therapy (71.4% SBRT vs. 12.7% Y90, P <0.001). The average cost for SBRT was $15,148, and Y90 was $41,360. SBRT and Y90 are effective therapies in the treatment of HCC, specifically having similar overall survival and progression-free survival. Y90 was found to have a significantly higher cost than SBRT. This study demonstrates the need for prospective studies to assess these modalities in treating HCC.

Long-term Outcomes from a Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients with Low- or Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer

BackgroundUltrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a standard treatment intervention for localized prostate cancer. ObjectiveTo report final long-term tumor control outcomes and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities from a single-center phase 1 dose escalation study using SBRT for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Design, setting and participantsBetween 2009 and 2012, 136 patients were enrolled and treated. The initial dose level was 32.5 Gy in five fractions. Doses were then sequentially escalated to 35 Gy, 37.5 Gy, and 40 Gy in five fractions delivered every other day. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary endpoint was late treatment-related toxicity. Secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. Results and limitationsThe median follow-up was 10.5 yr for the 32.5-Gy group, 9.9 yr for the 35-Gy group, 8.2 yr for the 37.5-Gy group, and 7.3 yr for the 40-Gy group. The 8-yr cumulative incidence of PSA failure was 26% for 32.5 Gy, 15% for 35 Gy, 3.4% for 37.5 Gy, and 6.6% for 40 Gy. Higher radiation dose (37.5–40 Gy) and favorable intermediate risk (vs unfavorable intermediate risk) were associated with better PSA recurrence rates (p = 0.011 and 0.002, respectively). The 8-yr actuarial probability rates for survival free from late grade ≥2 toxicity were 94% for GI toxicity and 86% for GU toxicity. No grade 4 events were recorded. Higher dose levels were not associated with higher rates of late grade ≥2 GI (p = 0.2) or GU (p > 0.9) toxicity. ConclusionsSBRT doses ranging from 32.5 to 40 Gy were associated with low incidence of moderate or severe toxicities. Higher doses resulted in superior disease control outcomes 8 yr after treatment. Patient summaryWe investigated the association between the radiotherapy dose used and the rate of control of prostate cancer. We found that higher doses resulted in more favorable outcomes without excess toxicity.This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00911118.

957P Interim report of Notable-HCC: A phase Ib study of neoadjuvant PD-1 with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

957P Interim report of Notable-HCC: A phase Ib study of neoadjuvant PD-1 with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Multicenter Retrospective Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients with Previously Untreated Initial Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The effectiveness of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been shown in many studies and its therapeutic effect is similar to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). However, many of these studies were done in combination with transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE), for recurrent HCC, or on a small scale. To better understand the specific outcomes of SBRT for HCC, we conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of SBRT for previously untreated initial HCC at Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JCOG) member hospitals. Patientswho underwent SBRT for HCC at JCOG member hospitals between July 2013 and December 2017 and met the following eligibility criteria were included: (1) initial HCC; (2) ≤ 3 nodules, ≤ 5 cm in diameter; (3) a Child-Pugh (CP) score of A or B; and (4) unsuitability for or refusal of standard treatment, such as surgery, transplantation, RFA and TACE. We evaluated the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) which was defined as the first instance of intra-hepatic recurrence after SBRT, disease-specific survival (DSS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Using Grey's test, patients who died of other diseases were analyzed as competing risks to estimate the cumulative incidence of local recurrence (CLR). Adverse events directly related to SBRT also analyzed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). Seventy-three patients with 79 lesions from 14 hospitals were analyzed. The median age was 77 years (range; 50-89 years), and the median tumor size was 23 mm (range; 6-50 mm). The median radiation dose was 40 Gy (range; 35-60 Gy) in five fractions (range; 4-8). The median follow-up period was 45 months (range; 0-103 months). There were three cases where follow-up was not possible due to unexpected events unrelated to SBRT, while the remaining 70 patients were successfully followed for at least six months. The 2 and 3year OS, RFS, DSS, and CLR rates were 84.3% (95% CI: 75.8-92.8%) and 69.9% (95% CI: 58.7-81%), 67.5% (95% CI: 56.0-79.0%) and 57.9% (95% CI: 45.2-70.5%), 95.1% (95% CI:89.7-100%)/87.6% (95% CI:78.8-96.3%), and 11.4% (95% CI: 5.3-20.0%) and 20.0% (95% CI: 11.2-30.5%), respectively. Four cases (5.5%) of adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported: one case of grade 3 laboratory toxicities, one case of grade 3 liver failure, one case of grade 3 portal tumor thrombosis, and one case of grade 4 duodenal ulcer. No grade 5 toxicities were observed. The results of our study demonstrate that SBRT for HCC is highly effective in achieving local control and is safe to administer. In addition, survival outcomes are favorable. SBRT is a promising treatment modality, especially for small HCCs for that is not suitable for standard treatment.

Biological Effective Dose (BED) in Evaluation of Rectal Dose in Prostate Cancer Patients with Hydrogel Spacer Who Underwent an EBRT with Different Fractionation Schemes

To evaluate rectal dose sparing in prostate cancer patients with hydrogel spacer who underwent an external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with different fractionation schemes. In a previous study, we have reported that rectal sparing was achieved in prostate cancer patients with hydrogel spacer who underwent a combination therapy of EBRT and LDR brachytherapy (Zhang H, et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2022). In this study, we focused on evaluation of spacer-related rectal sparing in patients who underwent an EBRT with conventional fractionation (81 Gy in 45 fractions), hypofractionation (70 Gy in 28 fractions), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for 40 Gy or 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions. In 172 patients, 119 patients were applied with injection of polyethylene-glycol hydrogel and others without the injection as control. In VMAT plans, doses to rectal wall were examined and converted to BED according to AAPM TG-137 (α/β ratio = 4 Gy). On average, an interspace of 1cm between prostate and rectum was achieved by spacer insertion. Rectal wall was defined as 0.4cm thickness inside the outer contour of rectum, and the volume ranged from 4.5 cm3 to 21.3cm3 for patients with spacer and from 8.2cm3 to 35.1cm3 for those with no spacer. In conventional scheme, an average rectal BED was 120.0 Gy, 116.9 Gy, 114.0 Gy, 108.6 Gy, 87.6 Gy and 55.6 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively, and BEDmean was 55.3 Gy in patients with no spacer. The BED decreased to 105.1 Gy, 96.3 Gy, 86.1 Gy, 75.4 Gy, 51.7 Gy and 26.9 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively (p < 0.01), and BEDmean was 46.0 Gy in patients with spacer. In hypofractionation, rectal BED was in average of 115.8 Gy, 112.3 Gy, 109.8 Gy, 103 Gy, 81.6 and 52.8 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively, and BEDmean was 48.6 Gy in patients with no spacer. Patients with spacer had significantly decreases of rectal BED, an average of 103 Gy, 91.7 Gy, 84.1 Gy, 72.8 Gy, 48.8 Gy and 26.0 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3, respectively (p < 0.01), BEDmean was 42.4 Gy. In SBRT, average rectal BED in patients with spacer decreased to 93.6 Gy, 78.4 Gy, 69 Gy, 57.5 Gy, 38.5 Gy and 21.5 Gy, in comparison of 124.1 Gy, 117,4 Gy, 110.9 Gy, 97.3 Gy, 59.7 Gy and 32.3 Gy to the volume of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10cm3 in those without spacer, respectively (p <0.01). BEDmean decreased to 32.0 Gy in patient with spacer, compared with 43.2 Gy in those with no spacer. Insertion of hydrogel spacer significantly improved rectal dose sparing, about 11.1% to 50.8% in conventional scheme, 12.4% to 51.6% in hypofractionation scheme, and 24.6% to 40.9% in SBRT patients. Furthermore, relatively more dose sparing on rectum was seen on the volume from 0.1cm3 to 2cm3 in SBRT patients.

The Feasibility of Fast, Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based O-Ring Linac Plans for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Poor Performance Status

As patients with poor performance status cannot endure long treatment times, it can lead to unplanned and prolonged radiation treatment or discontinuation of treatment. Moreover, prolonged radiation treatment appears to negatively affect survival for patients. We aimed to verify the feasibility of fast 4DCT-based O-ring linear accelerator (LINAC) treatment in lung 4D stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This study included data of 38 patients who received lung 4D-SBRT. Gating20-70% plans were based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values ranging from 20-70% using a C-arm LINAC. Non-GatingFB plans were retrospectively established based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values of 0-90% using an O-ring LINAC. The prescribed dose of 4,800 cGy was delivered to PTV in four fractions. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and gradient measurement (GM) of the PTV were analyzed to compare dosimetric data between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plans. Organs at risks (OARs) were analyzed in accordance with the RTOG 0915 protocol. Treatment delivery time and total monitor units (MU) were analyzed to compare the efficiency of treatment delivery. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p<0.05). For the PTV, there was no significant difference in the CI or HI between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plans (CI: 1.337±0.137, 1.335±0.174, HI: 0.939±0.015, 0.939±0.016, all at p>0.05). However, there was a significant difference in GM between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plan (1.528±0.206 cm, 1.381±0.222 cm, p<0.001). For OARs, all plans met the criteria for dose constraint. There was a significant difference between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plans except in the spinal cord. In particular, D1000cc and D1500cc values for the ipsilateral lung for Gating20-70% plans were 31.6% and 59.9% lower than those for Non-GatingFB plans (D1000cc: 50.780±132.061 cGy, 34.755±102.480 cGy, p<0.001, D1500cc: 6.641±14.598 cGy, 2.666±7.926 cGy, p<0.001). Treatment delivery time was 92% longer for Gating20-70% plans than for Non-GatingFB plans (5.0±0.4 min, 9.6±3.3 min, p = 0.043). The total MU value for Gating20-70% plans was 9.6% higher than that for Non-GatingFB plans (3665.8±230.7, 4016±236.9, p = 0.039). When compared to OARs both plans were acceptable per RTOG-0915 protocol, but significant differences were between Non-GatingFB and Gating20-70% plans. However, treatment delivery time of Non-GatingFB plans decreased by 47.9% than Gating20-70% plans. We verified the feasibility of fast 4DCT-based O-ring LINAC treatment for patients who cannot endure long treatment times due to poor performance status in lung 4D-SBRT. In further study, we will analyze dosimetric differences and treatment delivery efficiency considering tumor motion according to tumor location.

Conventionally Fractionated vs. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Treatment of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Local Control and Survival Outcomes in a Retrospective Single-Institutional Analysis

Unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC) is associated with dismal survival outcomes, with a reported median survival of 8-12 months. The role of radiotherapy (RT) and the choice of optimal fractionation remains unclear. Our objective was analyzing the outcomes associated with local radiotherapy as well as determine the best radiotherapeutic approach to treat these patients. From a database of 209 radiation plans of patients treated for pancreatic cancer in a single institution between August 2007 to August 2021, patients with UPC were selected for this REB approved retrospective study. From the 209 plans, 136 unique patients were identified who had RT for UPC. The mean age of the cohort was 67.6 years, 10% were >80 years and 37% were female. Median follow-up was 9.3 months. 54 patients had distant metastases at the time of RT and were analyzed separately. Outcomes where analyzed based on whether patients received Conventionally fractionated RT (CFRT) (defined as >15 fractions) (n = 23 (17%)), Hypofractionated RT (HypoRT) (defined as ≤15 fractions and EQD2<40Gy for α/β = 3) (n = 40 (29%)) and those treated with Stereotactic Body RT (SBRT) (defined as ≤5 fractions and EQD2≥40Gy for α/β = 3) (n = 19 (14%)). The mean overall survival (OS) and freedom from progression (FFP) in the SBRT cohort was 17.2 and 7.4 months respectively, in the CFRT cohort was 22.6 and 9.9 months respectively and in the HypoRT cohort was 11.4 and 4.9 months respectively. All CFRT patients received chemotherapy. Mean OS was drastically lower in SBRT and HypoRT patients who did not receive any chemotherapy (11.9 and 3.4 months respectively). Patients with metastatic disease at presentation and receiving HypoRT had mean OS of 13.4 months. The average EQD2 for the cohorts were 45.4 Gy, 49.2 Gy and 30.3 Gy for CFRT, SBRT and HypoRT respectively. Our study demonstrates that CFRT with concurrent chemotherapy offers better therapeutic outcomes in patients with UPC compared to HypoRT. The role of dose escalated SBRT needs to be explored as an equal alternative.