Step-up Approach Research Articles

STEP UP to University: Continuity and Belonging for Articulation Students

Articulation plays a key role in widening access to HE, but tailored support is necessary for a smooth transition. Articulating students often see themselves as lacking key skills and express concern at the significant differences between college and university. This case study explores how the academic skills team at the University of Dundee supports articulation through STEP UP: a credit-bearing module designed for students enrolled on a Social Sciences HNC at Dundee and Angus College who hold a direct entry place for second year Humanities at the university. A key strength of the STEP UP approach is its emphasis on continuity between college and university, welcoming students to the University during their college year. Students journal about their college experiences, create an artefact reflecting on their articulation year, and present a group project on "Becoming, Being, and Belonging" as a university student. They also implement feedback on their college writing to complete their first university essay, providing them with a clear link between their college and university assignments. Rather than emphasising the "gap" between college and university, STEP UP empowers students to recognise the skills they have developed during their HNC and identify how to employ these skills at university. By fostering reflexivity and feedback literacy, the module helps students understand what they bring to university and how they can grow within it. As Scottish institutions adjust to the new tertiary landscape, STEP UP demonstrates how emphasising continuity rather than difference can help articulation students develop their sense of belonging at university.

Prospective screening and proposed treatment algorithm for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced myositis in neoadjuvant-treated rectal cancer patients: data from the phase II CHINOREC trial

Abstract Background Myositis is an infrequent (<1%) but potentially life-threatening (case fatality rate 40-50%) immune-related adverse event (irAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), such as ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO). The true incidence is likely to be underestimated and may not be representative for curative neoadjuvant treatment approaches in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, especially in combination with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Currently, the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) does not suggest any pre-emptive screening or surveillance. Methods The CHINOREC study is an ongoing prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II investigator-initiated trial (IIT). Patients with intermediate to locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) receive either neoadjuvant CRT alone or in combination with a single dose of IPI and 3 cycles of NIVO, following surgical resection. Patients are monitored at baseline and throughout the whole study period for myotoxicity biomarkers, including cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI). Findings From 06/2020 to 11/2023, 80 patients have been enrolled of whom 50 patients were randomized to the CRT+IPI/NIVO arm. Six patients (12%) developed biopsy-verified myositis. Myositis treatment was promptly implemented using a pragmatic step-up approach. Patients received glucocorticoids (GC) with concomitant intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). If myotoxicity biomarkers did not improve, patients received infliximab (INFLIXI) and/or plasma exchange (PLEX). Although all patients had strikingly elevated cTnT (median peak 284 ng/L, 95% CI 39-3097), cTnI levels remained largely normal, correlating with a negative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). All patients underwent successful tumor surgery without any major surgical complication. As of today, all patients' creatine kinase (CK) and myoglobin (MB) levels have normalized and they are tumor free without any major sequela. Interpretation Longitudinal biomarker screening (cTnT/cTnI) for ICI-induced myotoxicities is pivotal in curative neoadjuvant-treated cancer patients to initiate an early counter treatment in a holistic step-up approach, without compromising oncological principles.

Ultrasound-Guided Intranodal Lipiodol Lymphangiography for the Assessment and Treatment of Chylous Leaks: A Retrospective Case Series from a Single Center in Switzerland and a Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Lymphatic leaks are well-known complications of major thoracic or abdominal surgeries, which significantly heighten morbidity and mortality rates. While the existing literature provides insights into managing these post-operative leaks, with a step-up approach from conservative measures (CMs) to surgical intervention, there are no standardized treatment guidelines. The purpose of this paper is to offer a management algorithm of post-operative lymphatic leaks based on a systematic literature review (SLR) of the therapeutic effect of Lipiodol lymphangiography (LL), completed by a case series of five patients who underwent LL in our department. Methods: In this IRB-approved study, we conducted an SLR following the PRISMA guidelines, using a PICOS. A quality assessment was performed for each study. The case series consisted of consecutive patients who underwent LL for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes at our institution between September 2018 and December 2020. Results: A total of 39 observational studies were included in the SLR comprising 11 retrospective case reviews (Group 1), and 3 case series as well as 25 case reports (Group 2). In total, these studies report cases of 557 patients (51.52% presenting oncological diagnoses; 43.98% having benefited from lymphadenectomy). Lymphatic or chylous fistulas were the most encountered complication, followed by chylothorax. The median volume of Lipiodol injected during lymphography was 11.7 mL (range: 9.8–75 mL). Overall, LL was technically successful in 77.7% (366/471) of patients. The clinical success of all technically successful LLs was 80.6% (295/366). Time-to-leak resolution after lymphography varied between 1 and 31 days. The factors associated with treatment failure were a high leak output (>500 mL/day) and Lipiodol extravasation on post-LL imaging. Our case series consisted of five patients (mean age: 62 ± 9.24 years; 20% female; 100% oncological diagnoses; 60% having beneficiated from lymphadenectomy). Technical and clinical successes were 80% (4/5) and 75% (3/4), respectively. Time-to-leak resolution varied between 1 and 4 days. The volume and technique of LL was not different from that identified in the SLR. Conclusions: LL is a safe procedure with high technical and clinical success rates that could be proposed as both a diagnostic and therapeutic solution for patients with post-operative central lymphatic lesions.

Surgical management of chronic pancreatitis: A narrative review.

Chronic pancreatitis is a severe disabling disease with persistent pain as the most prominent symptom often leading to significant quality of life (QoL) reduction. Current international guidelines propagate a step-up approach in which surgery should only be considered as a last resort in patients with failure of both medical and endoscopic interventions. Accumulating evidence, however, suggests that surgery is superior to endoscopic therapy and that early surgical intervention is beneficial in terms of pain relief, pancreatic function and QoL. Several surgical procedures are available with low morbidity and mortality rates, providing excellent long-term results. The purpose of this review was to present an overview of the surgical treatment options for chronic pancreatitis with a focus on the timing of surgery.

Interventions for Fluid Collections in Acute Pancreatitis: Expanding Horizon

AbstractManaging pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) in acute pancreatitis has undergone a paradigm shift. Endoscopic and surgical advancements have led to the development of safer and more effective techniques for draining PFCs and performing necrosectomy. These techniques have been effectively incorporated into the step-up approach. Percutaneous catheter drainage remains the cornerstone for managing PFCs, although its role has changed with the advent of endoscopic ultrasound-guided techniques. PFC management relies heavily on interdisciplinary collaboration. All the techniques must be considered complementary rather than competitive. The preference for one method over the other must consider the patient factors and availability of expertise. This review entails a detailed discussion of the intervention of PFCs with the latest available evidence.

Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for necrotizing pancreatitis: a single center experience in Colombia.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common and potentially lethal disease. Approximately 10-20% of the patients progress to necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). The step-up approach is the gold standard approach to managing an infected necrotizing pancreatitis with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) has been described as a safe and feasible approach with high success rates. Multiple studies in the American, European, and Asian populations evaluating the outcomes of VARD have been published; nevertheless, outcomes in the Latin American population are unknown. This study aims to describe a single-center experience of VARD for necrotizing pancreatitis in Colombia with a long-term follow-up. A prospective cohort study was conducted between 2016 and 2024. All patients over 18 years old who underwent VARD for necrotizing pancreatitis were included. Demographic, clinical variables, and postoperative outcomes at 30-day follow-up were described. A total of 12 patients were included. The mean age was 55.9 years old (SD 13.73). The median follow-up was 365 days (P25 60; P75 547). Bile origin was the most frequent cause of pancreatitis in 90.1% of the patients. The mean time between diagnosis and surgical management was 78.5 days (SD 22.93). The mean size of the collection was 10.5cm (SD 3.51). There was no evidence of intraoperative complications. The mean in-hospital length of stay was 65.18 days (SD 26.46). One patient died in a 30-day follow-up. One patient presented an incisional hernia one year after surgery, and there was no evidence of endocrine insufficiency at the follow-up. According to our data, the VARD procedure presents similar outcomes to those reported in the literature; a standardized procedure following the STEP-UP procedure minimizes the requirement of postoperative drainages. Long-term follow-up should be performed to rule out pancreatic insufficiency.

Waterjet pulse lavage as a safe adjunct to video assisted retroperitoneal debridement in necrotising pancreatitis

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgical necrosectomy plays an important role in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis, with a goal of removing debris and debriding necrotic tissue. Pulse lavage is designed to simultaneously hydrostatically debride and remove the infected necrotic tissue with suction. It is also able to remove significant amounts of debris without traumatic manipulation of the necrotic tissue which may be adherent to surrounding tissue and can result in injury.Methods and resultsThe surgical technique of utilising a waterjet pulse lavage device during the minimally invasive necrosectomy is detailed. Sixteen patients being managed via a step-up approach underwent endoscopic necrosectomy via a radiologically placed drain tract. All sixteen patients were successfully managed endoscopically without conversion to open necrosectomy, and survived their admission. There were no complications associated with the use of the waterjet pulse lavage.ConclusionWaterjet pulse lavage is a useful adjunct in minimally invasive necrosectomy, which reduces the length of the necrosectomy procedure, and facilitates removal of necrotic tissue while minimising the risk of traumatising healthy tissue.

Long-Term Efficacy of Posterior Neurectomy in Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome.

To analyze long-term treatment outcomes of a posterior neurectomy in a large cohort of patients with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES). The current step-up treatment approach for ACNES involves abdominal wall tender point injections, pulsed radiofrequency, and neurectomy. If an anterior neurectomy fails or pain reoccurs, a posterior neurectomy is considered as a final surgical option. Data on posterior neurectomy treatment outcomes are scarce. ACNES patients who underwent a unilateral posterior neurectomy between 2012 and 2022 in a single institution completed a questionnaire regarding their current pain status. Primary outcomes were short- and long-term treatment success, defined as ≥50% pain relief. Patients were stratified whether the operative indication was recurrent pain (>3months) after an initially successful anterior neurectomy or ongoing pain after an anterior neurectomy. Data from 260 of 379 patients (77% female, mean age 42years) were analyzed (68.6% response rate). Sensitivity analysis found that short-term outcomes were similar between responders and non-responders. The recurrent pain group demonstrated significantly better treatment outcomes compared to the ongoing pain group, both in the short-term (7weeks; treatment success 79.2% vs. 53.2%, p < 0.001) and long-term (58months; treatment success 61.1% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.001). Sixteen (minor) complications (6.2%) were reported, resulting in three surgical re-interventions (1.2%). A posterior neurectomy is long-term beneficial in approximately half of patients although treatment success is better for recurrent pain than ongoing pain. These findings aid in optimizing preoperative patient counseling.

Pancreatic necrosis: a scoping review.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a commonly encountered GI diagnosis, accounting for 275,000 hospital admissions annually in the United States alone. Pancreatic necrosis (PN) is the most common complication of AP, and the development of PN is associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. This expert review evaluates the evidence-based management of symptomatic PN from the era of maximal open pancreatic necrosectomy in the late 1990s though the modern paradigm of minimally invasive and endoscopic interventions. The authors present the retrospective and controlled data behind the "step-up approach" to PN treatment and discuss the application of current society guidance. Evidence based management of PN is characterized by early supportive care, and treatment by minimally invasive intervention when a patient is critically ill or persistently symptomatic. Appropriate choices when intervention is required include percutaneous drainage, minimally invasive surgery, and/or endoscopic treatment. The transition from open maximal necrosectomy to minimally invasive intervention has resulted in improved outcomes for patients, including gains in mortality, significant morbidity, and cost. The ideal precision management strategy for an individual patient remains an area of increasing understanding.

Implementation and improvement of a routine suicidal ideation screening process for an ambulatory, academic NCCN-designated center.

294 Background: From May – August 2021, outpatient suicidal ideation-related safety events nearly doubled from the three years prior at an academic NCCN center. This rise in events challenged staff and revealed improvement opportunities for suicide prevention, such as routine screening for suicidal ideation (SI) in the ambulatory setting. In addition, the COVID pandemic introduced an added layer of vulnerability to cancer patients, who are at an increased SI risk compared to the general population. Methods: From August 2021 - 2023, a multidisciplinary team developed and implemented a routine SI screening, intervention and escalation process that included a staff education program, a process-aligned EHR build, a metric dashboard, and a quality improvement-control plan. The vision was to identify all patients experiencing SI and support them with timely and compassionate care. A step-up metric target approach was used to set quarterly goals. The overarching goal was to screen at least 70% of eligible patients by the end of fiscal year 2024. The new process went live organization-wide on July 31, 2023. Following implementation, various improvement opportunities were identified with indicators including performance metrics, process audits, patient case reviews, and stakeholder feedback. Initial improvement efforts focused on clinics and sites that were screening &lt; 25% between FY24 Q1 and Q2. Continued collaboration between Quality Improvement and clinic leaders revealed improvement opportunities in identifying eligible patients and staff screening practices. Impactful interventions addressed patient identification and staff coaching. Results: As a new process, the overall screening rate started at 0% and increased to 48% over FY24*. Conclusions: Overall, a new SI screening process was successfully implemented, and improved with diligent PDSA work, yet metric goals were not achieved. Many factors may have contributed to underperformance. Ongoing evaluation and collaboration with stakeholders are crucial for continued improvement. Beyond these efforts exists the social and cultural stigma of suicide, which may have limited the impact of improvement endeavors. Results may demonstrate further need for open and supportive discussion with staff, patients, and the larger healthcare community. Data time range: 7/31/23-5/21/24.* FY24 + Quarter Metric Goal Screening Rate Q1 40% 35.7% Q2 50% 34.5% Q3 60% 41.2% Q4 70% 47.8%

Role of Necrosectomy in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review.

Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) is a severe complication of acute pancreatitis, characterized by necrosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic tissues, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The role of necrosectomy, the surgical removal of necrotic tissue, in the management of NP has evolved over the past few decades, moving from early aggressive surgical intervention to a more conservative and stepwise approach. This narrative review explores the historical perspectives, current practices, and future trends in the role of necrosectomy in NP. Early studies favored open surgical debridement; however, high mortality rates associated with early intervention prompted a shift towards minimally invasive techniques, delayed interventions, and the "step-up approach,"combining percutaneous drainage with minimally invasive surgery. We also review the indications for surgery, optimal timing, and various techniques, including video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement and endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. The review highlights the benefits of these strategies in reducing complications, improving patient outcomes, and minimizing hospital stays. Ongoing research into patient selection, timing, and procedural refinement will continue to shape the role of necrosectomy in NP management. Understanding the evolving role of necrosectomy is crucial for optimizing care and reducing the burden of this life-threatening condition.

Interventions in Budd-Chiari syndrome: an updated review.

Budd Chiari syndrome is a potentially treatable disease, and imaging is the key to its diagnosis. Clinical presentations may vary, ranging from asymptomatic to fulminant disease. Subacute BCS is the most common type encountered in clinical practice, characterized by ascites, hepatosplenomegaly, dilated abdominal wall veins, and varicosities in the lower limb and scrotum. While hepatic vein thrombosis is the leading cause in the West, membranous and short segmental occlusion are predominant in the Asian populations. These geographical variations have an impact on the treatment algorithm in managing BCS. Anticoagulation alone often fails to prevent disease progression, demanding further interventional therapy. Interventional therapy carries a lower morbidity and mortality than surgery. Anatomical recanalization and portosystemic shunting form the basis of endovascular management. Membranous or short-segment occlusion are best treated by angioplasty, which restores the physiological venous outflow and possibly disease reversal. Suboptimal results with angioplasty require stenting. Transjugular intrahepatic shunt (TIPS) or direct IVC to portal vein shunt (DIPS) decompresses the portal pressure and reduces the sinusoidal congestion, which in turn diminishes hepatocellular damage and hepatic fibrosis. Despite its ability to modify the disease course, TIPS carries several procedure and shunt-related complications, mainly hepatic encephalopathy. Thus, anatomical recanalization precedes TIPS in the traditional step-up approach in managing BCS. However, this concept is challenged by some authors, necessitating future reseach. TIPS is a valid bridge therapy in BCS with acute live failure awaiting liver transplantation. Despite all, interventional therapies fail in a subset of BCS patients, leaving them with only option of liver transplantation.

Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis: A Scoping Review.

While selective use of antibiotics for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in acute pancreatitis (AP) is recommended, studies indicate a high rate of inadequate treatment. A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted, focusing on primary research and meta-analyses. Data were categorized based on core concepts, and a narrative synthesis was performed. The search identified a total of 1016 publications. After evaluating 203 full texts and additional sources from the grey literature, 80 studies were included in the review. The answers obtained were: (1) Preventive treatment does not decrease the incidence of IPN or mortality. Given the risks of bacterial resistance and fungal infections, antibiotics should be reserved for highly suspected or confirmed IPN; (2) The diagnosis of IPN does not always require microbiological samples, as clinical suspicion or computed tomography signs can suffice. Early diagnosis and treatment may be improved by using biomarkers such as procalcitonin and novel microbiological methods; (3) When indicated, early initiation of antibiotics is a key determinant in reducing mortality associated with IPN; (4) Antibiotics with good penetration into pancreatic tissue covering Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria should be used. Routine antifungal therapy is not recommended; (5) The step-up approach, including antibiotics, is the standard for IPN management; (6) Antibiotic duration should be kept to a minimum and should be based on the quality of source control and patient condition. Early antibiotic therapy is essential for the treatment of IPN, but prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in AP. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to better understand the role of antibiotics and antifungals in AP management.

Effect of the Step-Jump Approach in Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

The effects of the step-jump approach on the survival and prognosis of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) patients have not yet been determined. Between November 2018 and June 2023, 188 patients were included in this study. There were 144 patients in the step-up group (the SU group) and 44 in the step-jump group (the SJ group). In the SU group, patients successfully treated with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) alone were classified into the SU-1 group (n=101), while those requiring additional surgery after PCD were categorized into the SU-2 group (n=43). In the SJ group, patients who underwent minimally invasive necrosectomy (MIN) without PCD were assigned to the SJ-1 group (n=34), whereas those who initially underwent PCD followed by immediate open surgery were placed in the SJ-2 group (n=10). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate bias. After PSM, a total of 34 pairs were successfully matched. A comparison of the SU group with the SJ-1 group (upfront MIN without PCD) revealed similar mortality rates (P=0.239); however, the incidences of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (P=0.029) and surgical complications (P<0.001) were significantly lower in the SJ-1 group. After comparing the SU-2 and SJ-2 groups (patients who underwent direct open necrosectomy without MIN after PCD failure), the incidences of surgical complications and MDRO in the SJ-2 group were significantly lower (P<0.05). Compared with the step-up approach, the step-jump approach is safer and more effective and can significantly reduce the incidence of MDRO and surgical complications.

Non-Operating Room Anesthesia (NORA) for Ultrasound-Guided Liver Radiofrequency Ablation.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-studied treatment option for locally non-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Sedation is of crucial interest as it enables safe and pain-free procedures. Whether the type of sedation has an impact on procedural outcome is still not well investigated. We retrospectively collected data on patients undergoing liver RFA for various oncological conditions. Procedures were conducted in a non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) setting. Procedural-related complications and short-term oncological outcomes were analyzed. Thirty-five patients (mean age 71.5 y, 80% male) were treated for HCC (26), CRLM (6) and gastric cancer metastases (3). Mean lesion size was 21 mm (SD ± 10.1 mm), and the most common tumor localization was the right hepatic lobe. RFA was performed in a step-up sedation approach, with subcutaneous lidocaine injection prior to needle placement and subsequent deep sedation during ablation. No anesthesia-related early or late complications occurred. One patient presented with pleural effusion due to a large ablation zone and was treated conservatively. Local tumor-free survival after 1 and 6 months was 100% in all cases where a curative RFA approach was intended. NORA for liver RFA comes with high patient acceptance and tolerance, and optimal postoperative outcomes and oncologic results.

The Potential Clinical Benefits of Direct Surgical Transgastric Pancreatic Necrosectomy for Patients With Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis.

Surgical transgastric pancreatic necrosectomy (STGN) has the potential to overcome the shortcomings (ie, repeat interventions, prolonged hospitalization) of the step-up approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. We aimed to determine the outcomes of STGN for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. This observational cohort study included adult patients who underwent STGN for infected necrosis at two centers from 2008 to 2022. Patients with a procedure for pancreatic necrosis before STGN were excluded. Primary outcomes included mortality, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, new-onset organ failure, repeat interventions, pancreatic fistulas, readmissions, and time to episode closure. Forty-three patients underwent STGN at a median of 48 days (interquartile range [IQR] 32-70) after disease onset. Mortality rate was 7% (n = 3). After STGN, the median length of hospital was 8 days (IQR 6-17), 23 patients (53.5%) required ICU admission (2 days [IQR 1-7]), and new-onset organ failure occurred in 8 patients (18.6%). Three patients (7%) required a reintervention, 1 (2.3%) developed a pancreatic fistula, and 11 (25.6%) were readmitted. The median time to episode closure was 11 days (IQR 6-22). STGN allows for treatment of retrogastric infected necrosis in one procedure and with rapid episode resolution. With these advantages and few pancreatic fistulas, direct STGN challenges the step-up approach.

Two-Port Minimally Invasive Nephro-Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Debridement for Pancreatic Necrosis.

Walled-off necrosis (WON) occurs in approximately 20% of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Infection occurs in approximately 30% of necrosis patients, and despite advances in management, infected necrosis still confers a high mortality between 30 and 40%. While sterile necrosis requires drainage only for cases of symptom relief or "persistent unwellness," prompt intervention is critical for infected necrosis. Several management strategies exist depending on the location and anatomy of the necrosum. In particular, retroperitoneal collections away from the stomach are typically managed with a step-up approach that begins with percutaneous drain placement. While a minority of patients skirt further intervention, the majority require formal debridement at some point via the existing drain tract. These debridement techniques include video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) through a flank incision or minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic (MIRP) necrosectomy under continuous irrigation with a nephroscope. While effective, both debridement strategies have drawbacks: for VARD, the flank incision is prone to infections and hernia while MIRP debridements are tedious and often require repeat operative trips. To overcome these pitfalls, we describe a novel two-trocar minimally invasive hybrid nephro-laparoscopic retroperitoneal debridement technique for an efficient retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy.

Outcomes of a step-up approach to the treatment of neurogenic cough

IntroductionNeurogenic cough (NC) is thought to be related to sensory neuropathy in the hypopharynx and larynx. Defined as a cough persisting longer than 8 weeks refractory to standard therapy, it is a diagnosis of exclusion when other common etiologies (asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), medication side effects) are ruled out. It affects roughly 11 % of Americans and can negatively impact quality of life. MethodsFollowing institutional review board approval, we evaluated the medical records of adult patients seen at the University of Arizona's tertiary laryngology center from 2018 to 2023. Patients were included if their cough persisted for >8 weeks, and they either did not respond to prior proton pump inhibitor and asthma therapy or had GERD and asthma ruled out. These patients underwent a progressive escalation of therapy, which included neuromodulators with or without cough suppression therapy, superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block, and laryngeal botulinum toxin injections. The primary outcome was patient-reported improvement in cough symptoms rated on a 1–5 scale: 1 = no response, 2 = mild improvement, 3 = moderate improvement, 4 = significant improvement, 5 = complete resolution. ResultsA total of 56 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 64.6 (14.8) years, and 66 % were female. Overall, 42 patients (75.0 %) responded to treatment. Among responders, 7 (16.7 %) experienced mild improvement, 14 (33.3 %) experienced moderate improvement, 17 (40.5 %) experienced significant improvement, and 4 (9.5 %) experienced complete resolution of their cough.33 patients (58.9 %) were managed exclusively with neuromodulators ± cough suppression therapy; 27 responded, with an average response rating of 3.0 (SD = 1.2). 11 patients (19.6 %) failed medical therapy and underwent SLN block without subsequent botox treatment; 7 responded, with an average response rating of 2.5 (SD = 1.4). 9 patients (16.1 %) failed all previous therapies and underwent laryngeal botulinum toxin injections; 6 responded with an average response rating of 2.4 (SD = 1.3). The remaining 3 patients underwent cough suppression therapy alone, with 2 responding and an average response rating of 3.3 (SD = 1.7). ConclusionsNeurogenic cough can be effectively treated with a stepwise multimodal approach, including neuromodulators, cough suppression therapy, SLN block, and laryngeal botulinum toxin injections.

Step-up approach for the treatment of infected necrotising pancreatitis: real life data from a single-centre experience with long-term follow-up

BackgroundAbout 20% of patients with acute pancreatitis develop a necrotising form with a worse prognosis due to frequent appearance of organ failure(s) and/or infection of necrosis. Aims of the present study was to evaluate the “step up” approach treatment of infected necrosis in terms of: feasibility, success in resolving infection, morbidity of procedures, risk factors associated with death and long-term sequels.MethodsIn this observational retrospective monocentric study in the real life, necrotizing acute pancreatitis at the stage of infected walled-off necrosis were treated as follow: first step with drainage (radiologic and/or endoscopic-ultrasound-guided with lumen apposing metal stent); in case of failure, minimally invasive necrosectomy sessions(s) by endoscopy through the stent and/or via retroperitoneal surgery (step 2); If necessary open surgery as a third step. Efficacy was assessed upon to a composite clinical-biological criterion: resolution of organ failure(s), decrease of at least two of clinico-biological criteria among fever, CRP serum level, and leucocytes count).ResultsForty-one consecutive patients were treated. The step-up strategy: (i) was feasible in 100% of cases; (ii) allowed the infection to be resolved in 33 patients (80.5%); (iii) Morbidity was mild and rapidly resolutive; (iv) the mortality rate at 6 months was of 19.5% (significant factors: SIRS and one or more organ failure(s) at admission, fungal infection, size of the largest collection ≥ 16 cm). During the follow-up (median 72 months): 27% of patients developed an exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, 45% developed or worsened a previous diabetes, 24% had pancreatic fistula and one parietal hernia.ConclusionsBeside a very good feasibility, the step-up approach for treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis in the real life displays a clinico-biological efficacy in 80% of cases with acceptable morbidity, mortality and long-term sequels regarding the severity of the disease.

Step-Up versus Open Approach in the Treatment of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Case-Matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Long-Term Pancreatic Sufficiency.

Background/Objectives: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) with secondary infection of necrotic tissue is associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The optimal approach is still debatable, but the minimally invasive modality has gained great attention in the last decade as it follows the principle of applying minimal surgical trauma to achieve a satisfying therapeutic objective. We compared clinical outcomes between the step-up approach (SUA) and open necrosectomy (ON) in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Methods: A prospective cohort study over the period of 2011-2021 in a university teaching hospital was performed. Results of 99 consecutive patients with ANP who required surgical/radiological intervention were collected. A case match analysis (2:1) was performed, and the final groups comprised 40 patients in the OA group and 20 patients in the SUA group. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment data were reviewed. Results: Baseline characteristics and disease severity were comparable between the two groups. The patients from the SUA group had a significantly lower morbidity rate and rate of pancreatic insufficiency. Death occurred in 4 of 20 patients (20%) in the SUA group and in 11 of 40 patients (27.5%) in the ON group (risk ratio with the step-up approach, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 1.99; p = 0.53). Conclusions: A minimally invasive step-up approach provides comparable outcomes to open necrosectomy in the treatment of ANP with infected pancreatic necrosis. While mortality and hospital stay were comparable between the groups, morbidity and pancreatic insufficiency were significantly lower in the SUA group. Further studies on a larger number of patients are required to define the place of SUA in the modern treatment of ANP.