Stenting For Malignant Biliary Obstruction Research Articles

Efficacy of a Newly Developed Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Efficacy of a Newly Developed Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Safety and efficacy of biliary suprapapillary metal and plastic stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biliary drainage is vital in managing malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Suprapapillary stenting has emerged as a viable alternative to transpapillary stenting and is performed using inside plastic (iPS) or metal stents (iMS). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of suprapapillary stent placement for MBO. The Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to include all studies published before September 31, 2023, that reported on the outcomes of suprapapillary stents placed for MBO. Using the random-effect model, the pooled, weight-adjusted event rate estimate for the clinical outcomes was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-eight studies were included, with a total of 1401 patients. The pooled clinical success rate was 98.9%. A subgroup analysis yielded non-significant differences between the iPS and iMS groups (99.3% vs. 98.6%, respectively; P = 0.44). The pooled incidence rate of adverse events (AE) with suprapapillary stents was 9.5%. In a subgroup analysis, the incidence of AEs with iPS was 10.7% compared to 9% in the iMS group without a statistical difference (P = 0.32). The most common adverse event was cholangitis (2.2%), followed by pancreatitis (1.1%), cholecystitis (0.5%), and bleeding (0.12%). When technically feasible, suprapapillary stenting for MBO is a viable endoscopic option with a high clinical success rate and acceptable adverse event rates. Both iPS and iMS exhibit similar efficacy.

Safety and efficacy of biliary suprapapillary metal and plastic stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biliary drainage is vital in managing malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Suprapapillary stenting has emerged as a viable alternative to transpapillary stenting and is performed using inside plastic (iPS) or metal stents (iMS). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of suprapapillary stent placement for MBO. The Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to include all studies published before September 31, 2023, that reported on the outcomes of suprapapillary stents placed for MBO. Using the random-effect model, the pooled, weight-adjusted event rate estimate for the clinical outcomes was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-eight studies were included, with a total of 1401 patients. The pooled clinical success rate was 98.9%. A subgroup analysis yielded non-significant differences between the iPS and iMS groups (99.3% vs. 98.6%, respectively; P = 0.44). The pooled incidence rate of adverse events (AE) with suprapapillary stents was 9.5%. In a subgroup analysis, the incidence of AEs with iPS was 10.7% compared to 9% in the iMS group without a statistical difference (P = 0.32). The most common adverse event was cholangitis (2.2%), followed by pancreatitis (1.1%), cholecystitis (0.5%), and bleeding (0.12%). When technically feasible, suprapapillary stenting for MBO is a viable endoscopic option with a high clinical success rate and acceptable adverse event rates. Both iPS and iMS exhibit similar efficacy.

Efficacy of a Newly Developed Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Efficacy of a Newly Developed Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Antegrade stenting using a new covered multi-hole metal stent for malignant biliary obstruction in surgically altered anatomy.

Antegrade stenting using a new covered multi-hole metal stent for malignant biliary obstruction in surgically altered anatomy.

Factors associated with patency of self-expandable metal stents in malignant biliary obstruction

IntroductionEndoscopic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is the key endoscopic treatment for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. The benefit of covered SEMS over uncovered SEMS remains unknown as are risk factors for SEMS dysfunction. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with patency of SEMS.MethodsPatients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction who underwent endoscopic SEMS placement at Ramathibodi Hospital, during January 2012 to March 2021 were included. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes and patency of SEMS were collected. The primary outcome were stent patency and factors associated with patency of SEMS. The factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Median days of stent patency, median time of patient survival, rate of reintervention and complications after SEMS placement were collected.ResultsOne hundred and fourteen patients were included. SEMS dysfunction was found in 37 patients (32.5%). Size of cancer (Hazard ratio (HR), 1.20, (95% CI 1.02, 1.40), p 0.025), presence of stones or sludge during SEMS placement (Hazard ratio (HR), 3.91, (95% CI 1.74, 8.75), p 0.001), length of SEMS, 8 cm (HR 2.96, (95% CI 1.06, 8.3), p 0.039), and total bilirubin level above 2 mg/dL at one month after SEMS placement (HR 1.14, (95% CI 1.06, 1.22), p < 0.001) were associated with SEMS dysfunction. The median stent patency was 97 days. The median patient survival was 133 days, (95% CI 75–165). The rate of reintervention was 86% in patients with SEMS dysfunction.ConclusionThe size of cancer, presence of stones or sludge during SEMS placement, the length of SEMS, and total bilirubin level above 2 mg/dL at 1 month after SEMS placement were associated with SEMS dysfunction. The median time of stent patency were not statistically different in each type of stent, covered stent, partially covered stent and uncovered stent. Median survival time of patients did not associate with SEMS patency or dysfunction.

S3340 Dual Biliary Decompression: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage With Common Bile Duct Stenting in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Acute Cholecystitis

S3340 Dual Biliary Decompression: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage With Common Bile Duct Stenting in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Acute Cholecystitis

Acute Pancreatitis After Percutaneous Metallic Stent Insertion for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Retrospective 2-Center Study.

The current study investigated the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of acute pancreatitis after percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction. From March 2016 to May 2020, a total of 425 patients who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent- ing for malignant biliary obstruction were included in this 2-center study. After the procedure, we analyzed the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of acute pancreatitis. On follow-up, 79 (18.6%) patients showed increased serum amylase levels, of whom 41 (9.6%) developed pancreatitis. On binary logistic regression analysis, stent across the duodenal papilla (odds ratio = 8.54; 95% CI = 3.54-20.62; P < .001) and visualization of the pancreatic duct (odds ratio = 9.87; 95% CI = 4.67-20.86; P < .001) were significant risk factors of pancreatitis after the procedure. Using conservative therapy, all patients were successfully managed at a mean of 3.5 days (range 1-6 days), and no severe pancreatitis happened. Acute pancreatitis is a relatively common complication after percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting. Stent across the duodenal papilla and visualization of the pancreatic duct are independent risk factors.

Outcomes of two types of iodine-125 seed delivery with metal stents in treating malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of two types of iodine-125 (I-125) seed delivery with metal stents (the study group) versus conventional metal stents (the control group) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Our team systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies published from January 2012 up to July 2021. Survival time and stent dysfunction were the primary measured outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the type of I-125 seed delivery. Eleven studies, including 1057 patients in total, were pooled for stent dysfunction. The study group showed a lower risk of stent dysfunction than the control group [odds ratio (OR): 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.81, P = 0.001]. The pooled results of six studies reporting overall survival (OS) showed that the study group had a better survival outcome than the control group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.42, P < 0.001]. In the subgroup analyses, the I-125 seed stent group had significantly less stent dysfunction than the control group (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.76, P = 0.002). Meanwhile, the metal stents + I-125 radioactive seed strand group showed significantly more improvement in OS than the control group (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.26-0.42, P < 0.001). Moreover, our analysis suggests that using I-125 seeds did not result in increasing related adverse events compared with using metal stents alone (all P > 0.05). The study group was significantly superior to the control group, with better survival and decreased stent dysfunction. Meanwhile, the delivery of I-125 seeds did not increase adverse events. The delivery of I-125 with metal stents may be considered a preferable technique for MBO.

Development and validation of a risk score for predicting clinical success after endobiliary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction.

BackgroundEndoscopic drainage is the primary treatment for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). This study developed and validated a pre-endoscopic predictive score for clinical success after stent placement.MethodsPatients with unresectable MBO undergoing ERCP-guided endobiliary stent placement between 2007 and 2017 were randomly divided into derivation (n = 383) and validation (n = 128) cohorts. To develop the risk score, clinical parameters were built by logistic regression to predict (1) ≥ 50% total bilirubin (TB) resolution within 2 weeks and (2) bilirubin normalization (TB level <1.2 mg/dL) within 6 weeks following stenting. The scoring scheme was applied to the validation cohort to test its performance.ResultsA ≥ 50% TB resolution within 2 weeks was shown in 70.5% of cases. The risk scoring scheme had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64–0.76) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57–0.77) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Thirty-one percent had TB normalization within 6 weeks after stenting. Significant predictors for TB normalization were extrahepatic biliary obstruction (odds ratio [OR] = 2.35), pre-endoscopic TB level (OR = 0.88), and stent type (OR = 0.42). The AUROC of a risk score for predicting TB normalization within 6 weeks was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72–0.83) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.67–0.86) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. A score > 1.30 yielded a specificity of 98% and a positive predictive value of 84% for predicting TB normalization. A score of < -4.18 provided a sensitivity of 80%–90% and a negative predictive value of 90%–93% for predicting the absence of TB normalization.ConclusionsThe pre-endoscopic scoring system comprising biliary obstruction level, liver biochemistry, and type of stent provides prediction indices for TB normalization within 6 weeks after stenting. This scheme may help endoscopists identify patients with unresectable MBO suited for palliative stenting.

Rapid identification of source of delayed hemobilia following endoscopic metallic stenting for malignant biliary obstruction.

Delayed hemobilia, a rare but potentially fatal complication of endoscopic metallic stenting for malignant biliary obstruction, requires prompt identification of the source of bleeding and subsequent embolization. However, hemobilia is characteristically intermittent, and computed tomography (CT) often fails to show pseudoaneurysms or extravasations. In particular, because the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery (PSPDA) runs alongside the common bile duct for its whole length, it is readily obscured by metallic artifacts in that duct, such as stents, making identification of the source of bleeding by CT difficult. We have encountered three patients with delayed hemobilia from the PSPDA following endoscopic biliary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction in whom no extravasation or pseudoaneurysms were detected by contrast-enhanced CT during bleeding. However, when we identified that the PSPDA had a smaller diameter than in previous CTs in all three cases, we suspected that the PSPDA was the source of the bleeding. No extravasation or pseudoaneurysms were detected with celiac arteriography or superior mesenteric arteriography; however, extravasation and pseudoaneurysms were detected by direct PSPDA angiography. Hemostasis was achieved through embolization. Detecting a large decrease in the diameter of the PSPDA on contrast-enhanced CT during biliary bleeding may help to identify the source of that bleeding.

PARTIALLY COVERED VERSUS UNCOVERED SELF-EXPANDIBLE METAL STENTS IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT DISTAL BILIARY OBSTRUCTION

Kyo-Sang Yoo: NO financial relationship with a commercial interest Background/Aims: Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are commonly used to relieve malignant biliary obstruction. Covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) were introduced to improve the patency of SEMSs by preventing tissue ingrowth. Unlike uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs), which are integrated into the tumor or duct wall, CSEMSs do not embed, but has an increased risk of migration. Although several retrospective studies comparing these two types of stents for malignant biliary obstruction have shown longer patency with CSEMSs, prospective, randomized trials have not been able to confirm these results.

Safety and Efficacy of a Large-Bore Biliary Metallic Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are typically inserted in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. However, SEMSs are susceptible to occlusion. To overcome this issue, we developed a large-bore, dumbbell-shaped, fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS-L) and compared its efficacy and safety with those of a conventional FCSEMS (FCSEMS-C) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Methods: Patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction were retrospectively enrolled between January 2011 and February 2021. All patients underwent endoscopic insertion of FCSEMSs. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), patient survival time, complications, and prognosis were analyzed. Results: RBO occurred in 31 patients (35.6%) who received an FCSEMS-L, and in 34 (45.9%) who received an FCSEMS-C. Stent occlusion occurred in 19 patients (21.8%) who received an FCSEMS-L, and in 22 (29.7%) who received an FCSEMS-C. Stent migration occurred in 12 patients (13.8%) with an FCSEMS-L and 12 (16.2%) with an FCSEMS-C. The median time to RBO (TRBO) was 301 days with an FCSEMS-L and 203 days with an FCSEMS-C. The median survival time was 479 days with an FCSEMS-L and 523 days with an FCSEMS-C. The TRBO and patient survival time did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in efficacy and complication rates between the fully covered large bore SEMSs and conventional fully covered SEMSs.

Endoscopic stenting for malignant biliary obstruction is technically successful in patients with preexisting duodenal stents.

Background and study aims There are limited data on the success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction with a preexisting duodenal stent. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and procedural outcomes of a cohort of patients with preexisting duodenal stents who underwent an attempt at ERCP for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Patients and methods This was a single-center retrospective study on consecutive patients with a preexisting duodenal stent who underwent attempted ERCP for MBO. Technical success was defined as successful cannulation of the common bile duct, with successful dilation and/or deployment of a biliary stent under fluoroscopy. Clinical success was defined as number of patients in the entire group who underwent ERCP successfully with resolution of symptoms. Results We identified 64 patients (73 % men, 74 % white, median age 62 years) with a preexisting duodenal stent who underwent 85 attempts at ERCP. ERCP was technically successful in 50 of 85 procedures (59 %). Overall ERCP was successful in 41 of 85 patients (48 %). ERCP was more likely to be successful in patients with Type 1 and 3 duodenal strictures than with Type 2 strictures (83 % and 92 % vs. 42 %, P < 0.01), in patients with a preexisting sphincterotomy (79% vs. 20 %, P = 0.01) or preexisting biliary stent (66 % vs. 34 %, P = 0.04). Adverse events included bleeding (n = 3), post-procedure fever (n = 3) and abdominal pain (n = 1). Conclusions Although biliary stenting via ERCP is often technically challenging in patients with a prior duodenal stent, it is a safe and effective method of biliary drainage. ERCP should be attempted in patients with Type 1 and 3 duodenal strictures, a prior sphincterotomy or an indwelling biliary stent.

Endoscopic Stenting for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: Results of a Nationwide Experience.

Background/AimsMany unanswered questions remain about the treatment of malignant hilar obstruction. We investigated endoscopic stenting for malignant biliary strictures, as reported in a nationwide registry. MethodsAll endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures entered in the Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery and ERCP from January 2010 to December 2017 in which stenting was performed for malignant biliary stricture management were included in this study. Patency was estimated by determining the time to reintervention. ResultsEndoscopic stenting was performed for malignant stricture management in 4623 ERCP procedures, of which 1364 (29.5%) were performed for hilar strictures. Of the hilar strictures, 320 (23.5%) were intrahepatic strictures (Bismuth–Corlette III–IV). Adverse events were more common after hilar stenting than after distal stenting (17.2% vs. 12.0%, p<0.0001). The 6-month reintervention rate was 73.4% after hilar stenting compared with 55.9% after distal stenting (p<0.0001). The 6-month reintervention rates for Bismuth–Corlette types I, II, IIIa, IIIb, and IV were 70.4%, 75.6%, 90.0%, 87.5%, and 85.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the risk for reintervention was three times higher after hilar stenting than after distal stenting (hazard ratio 3.47, 95% confidence interval 2.01–6.00, p<0.001). ConclusionsThis study with a relatively large patient cohort undergoing endoscopic stenting confirms that stenting for malignant hilar obstruction has more adverse events and lower patency than stenting for distal malignant obstruction.

Usefulness of self-expandable metal stents for malignant biliary obstruction using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) using a short-type single-balloon enteroscopy (short SBE) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA). The technical success rate, clinical success rate, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), procedure related adverse events, and reintervention after RBO were evaluated from September 2011 to June 2020. Thirty-seven patients (11 patients with distal MBO and 26 with hilar MBO) who underwent SEMS placement were included in the analysis. The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 94.6%. Seven patients underwent bilateral stenting (partial stent-in-stent placement) for hilar MBO. The RBO rate was 13.5% (5/37) and the median TRBO was 212 (interquartile range [IQR], 154-296) days. No food impaction occurred in this study. Procedure related adverse events occurred in 5.4% (2/37) of cases. Reintervention was attempted in five patients and all succeeded (four patients underwent SEMS replacement, and one underwent plastic stent placement). SEMS placement for unresectable MBO using a short SBE in patients with SAA is effective and safe in similar ways to that in patients with normal anatomy in terms of bilateral stenting, stent patency, and reintervention.

Comparison of Curative Effect between Nasobiliary Drainage and Biliary Stenting in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To compare the efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) and endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) in preoperative biliary drainage (PBD). Methods: ENBD and EBS related literature of patients with malignant biliary obstruction published before September 2019 were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for comparison analysis. Revman 5.3 statistical software was used for analysis. Results: Nine studies were used for our comparative study. A total of 1435 patients were included, which consisted of 813 in the ENBD group and 622 in the EBS group. Meta-analysis showed that patients with malignant biliary obstruction who received ENBD had reductions in the rates of preoperative cholangitis (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.34-0.58, P < 0.00001), preoperative pancreatitis (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.50-0.95, P =0.02), stent dysfunction (RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.43-0.80, P =0.0008), morbidity (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.93, P = 0.007) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45-0.92, P = 0.02) compared with patients who received EBS. Conclusions: The rates of preoperative cholangitis, preoperative pancreatitis, post-operative pancreatic fistula, stent dysfunction, and morbidity of ENBD patients were lower than those of EBS patients. In clinical practice, the physical condition of each patient and their tolerance should be fully considered. ENBD should be given priority. EBS should be replaced if stent dysfunction or intolerance occurs.

Predictive Factors and Surgical Outcomes of Stent Dysfunction After Preoperative Endoscopic Biliary Stenting in Patients Who Underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Background: Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) using a plastic stent is currently widely performed for preoperative biliary drainage for periampullary cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors and surgical outcomes of stent dysfunction after EBS in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Patients and Methods: The subjects were 85 patients who underwent PD after EBS using a plastic stent for malignant biliary obstruction between November 2008 and January 2019. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between perioperative patient characteristics and the incidence of stent dysfunction. Stent dysfunction was defined as insufficient biliary drainage and the presence of various symptoms, including high fever and abdominal pain, with elevated serum hepatobiliary enzyme levels or bilirubin level. Results: Stent dysfunction occurred in 38% of patients. In univariate analysis, serum total bilirubin before the initial EBS ≥15 mg/dL (P = .0244) and a stent diameter of 7 Fr (P = .0044) were significant predictors of stent dysfunction. In multivariate analysis, the only significant independent predictor of stent dysfunction was a stent diameter of 7 Fr (P = .0227). In the patients without stent dysfunction, duration from the initial EBS to the operation was significantly shorter than that in the patients with stent dysfunction (P = .0055). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and bile leakage were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Seven French stent was the significant independent predictor of stent dysfunction after EBS in patients who underwent PD.

Lumen-apposing metal stents for malignant biliary obstruction: Is this the ultimate horizon of our experience?

In the last years, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has evolved from a purely diagnostic technique to a more and more complex interventional procedure, with the possibility to perform several type of therapeutic interventions. Among these, EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD) is gaining popularity as a therapeutic approach after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), due to the avoidance of external drainage, a lower rate of adverse events and re-interventions, and lower costs compared to percutaneous trans-hepatic BD. Initially, devices created for luminal procedures (e.g., luminal biliary stents) have been adapted to the new trans-luminal EUS-guided interventions, with predictable shortcomings in technical success, outcome and adverse events. More recently, new metal stents specifically designed for transluminal drainage, namely lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), have been made available for EUS-guided procedures. An electrocautery enhanced delivery system (EC-LAMS), which allows direct access of the delivery system to the target lumen, has subsequently simplified the classic multi-step procedure of EUS-guided drainages. EUS-BD using LAMS and EC-LAMS has been demonstrated effective and safe, and currently seems one of the most performing techniques for EUS-BD. In this Review, we summarize the evolution of the EUS-BD in distal MBO, focusing on the novelty of LAMS and analyzing the unresolved questions about the possible role of EUS as the first therapeutic option to achieve BD in this setting of patients.

Sa1412 PARTIALLY COVERED VERSUS UNCOVERED SELF-EXPANDABLE METAL STENTS IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT DISTAL BILIARY OBSTRUCTION

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are commonly used to relieve malignant biliary obstruction. Covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) were introduced to improve the patency of SEMSs by preventing tissue ingrowth. Unlike uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs), which are integrated into the tumor or duct wall, CSEMSs do not embed, but have an increased risk of migration. Although several retrospective studies comparing these two types of stents for malignant biliary obstruction have shown longer patency with CSEMSs, prospective, randomized trials have not been able to confirm these results. Partially covered self-expandable metal stents (PCSEMSs) has been introduced to reduce migration with advantage of CSEMSs preventing tumor ingrowth. The aim of this study was to compare stent patency and clinical outcomes between PCSEMSs and USEMSs in malignant biliary obstruction.