Stenting Of Bifurcation Lesions Research Articles

A Bayesian meta-analysis of double kissing (DK) crush or provisional stenting for coronary artery bifurcation lesions

ObjectiveDespite the development of dedicated, two-stent strategies, including the double kissing (DK) crush technique, the ideal technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting has not been identified. We aimed to compare and determine the absolute risk difference (ARD) of the DK crush technique alone versus provisional stenting approaches for coronary bifurcation lesions, using the Bayesian technique. MethodWe queried PubMed/MEDLINE to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DK crush technique with provisional stenting for bifurcation lesions, published till January 2023. We used Bayesian methods to calculate the ARD and 95% credible interval (CrI). ResultsWe included three RCTs, with 916 patients, in the final analysis. The ARD of cardiac death was centered at −0.01 (95% CrI: −0.04 to 0.02; Tau: 0.02, 85% probability of ARD of DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). ARD for myocardial infarction was centered at −0.03 (95%CrI: −0.9 to 0.03; Tau: 0.05, 87% probability of ARD of DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). ARD for stent thrombosis was centered at 0.00 (95% CrI: −0.04 to 0.03, Tau: 0.03, 51% probability of ARD for DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). Finally, ARD for target lesion revascularization was centered at −0.05 (95% CrI: −0.08 to −0.03, Tau: 0.02, 99.97% probability of ARD for DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). ConclusionsBayesian analysis demonstrated a lower probability of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization, with DK crush compared with provisional stenting techniques, and a minimal probability of difference in stent thrombosis.

On-Site Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions With Angiographically Difficulty in Separation.

On-Site Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions With Angiographically Difficulty in Separation.

DES Selection for Left Main and Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.

Coronary bifurcation lesions present a challenging lesion subset regarding procedural complexity and worse patient outcomes as compared to simple lesions. Drug eluting stents (DES), as the current standard of care for percutaneous myocardial revascularization, have tubular design and uniform diameter, and therefore, need to be subjected to a standardized set of procedural modifications, to optimally fit and reconstruct underlying bifurcation anatomy. Since contemporary DES have various design platforms, with diverse mechanical properties, we must be aware of the device's favorable characteristics and limitations, to ensure maximal procedural safety and success. This is especially true for bifurcation lesion stenting, during which device integrity will often be eventually tested by undergoing specific procedural steps, such as proximal balloon optimization, kissing-balloon inflations, or even intentional stent crushing. In this review we address the design characteristics of contemporary DES, their bifurcation-specific experimental testing data, and reported clinical results, in an attempt to provide relevant information and help in device selection for bifurcation stenting procedures.

Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting balloons for treatment of side branches in patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions

Background: Bifurcation treatments make up ca. 15–20% of coronary interventions. Despite the use of drug-eluting stents, the management of bifurcation lesions, especially with side branches involved, remains a challenge.Objective: To evaluate long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes after using a paclitaxel-coated balloon for the treatment of side branches in patients with true bifurcation lesions.Methods: Eighty patients with coronary artery disease were enrolled after true bifurcation lesion stenting. All patients were randomized at the 1:1 ratio to the group of main branches stenting followed by the dilatation of side branches with drug-eluting balloons and provisional stenting group.Results: Long-term results were analyzed after 12 months. The most common bifurcation lesion involved the left anterior descending artery and diagonal branch (57.5%). Late lumen loss in the side branch (0.51 ± 0.22 vs 0.33 ± 0.24 mm) and in both the bifurcation branches (main branch + side branch) (1.06 ± 0.29 vs 0.79 ± 0.27 mm) was significantly higher in the patients after provisional stenting.Overall postoperative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was 17.5% and 7.5% (p = 0.31) in the provisional stenting and drug coated balloon groups, respectively. Patients with drug-eluting balloons for the treatment of side branches had a more pronounced decrease in angina symptoms after 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes mellitus (OR: 10.9) and glomerular filtration rate (OR: 0.95) were independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in bifurcation interventions.Conclusion: Drug-eluting balloons for the dilatation of side branches after the stenting of main branches are superior to provisional stenting in terms of the late lumen loss. Received 31 August 2022. Revised 17 November 2022. Accepted 18 November 2022. Funding: The study did not have sponsorship. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Contribution of the authorsConception and study design: T.K. Eraliev, D.A. Khelimskii, A.G. Badoian, O.V. KrestyaninovData collection and analysis: T.K. Eraliev, D.A. Khelimskii, A.G. Badoian, O.V. Krestyaninov, A.A. Baranov, A.P. GorgulkoStatistical analysis: T.K. Eraliev, D.A. Khelimskii, A.G. BadoianDrafting the article: T.K. Eraliev, D.A. Khelimskii, A.G. Badoian, O.V. Krestyaninov, A.A. Baranov, A.P. GorgulkoCritical revision of the article: T.K. Eraliev, D.A. Khelimskii, A.G. Badoian, O.V. KrestyaninovFinal approval of the version to be published: T.K. Eraliev, D.A. Khelimskii, A.G. Badoian, O.V. Krestyaninov, A.A. Baranov, A.P. Gorgulko

A novel hybrid strategy of drug coated balloon and stent for coronary bifurcation lesions

Background. Provisional side branch (SB) stenting strategy is the default approach for the majority of bifurcation lesions, but outcomes of SB is suboptimal. Though drug coated balloon (DCB) improving SB outcomes attracts an increasing attention, sequence of DCB hasn’t yet been determined. We presented a novel hybrid strategy of DCB and stent for bifurcation lesions. Methods. With lesion preparation, DCB was persistently inflated in SB kissing with main branch (MB) stent deployment and balloon post-dilation of the bifurcation core. Proximal optimization technique was performed strictly not exceeding the bifurcation. Procedural and clinical adverse events were evaluated. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classification was assessed at baseline and clinical follow-up. Results. Fourteen patients undergoing the hybrid technique from August 2020 to July 2021 were enrolled. The technique was successfully performed in all patients without rewiring or SB compromise. Minimal lumen diameter of SB increased from 0.60 ± 0.40 mm to 2.1 ± 0.2 mm while the percent stenosis decreased from 72.4 ± 17.9% to 19.6 ± 4.7%. In addition, intravascular ultrasound indicated comparable stent symmetry index and incomplete stent apposition between proximal and distal segments of stent. No further intervention was performed, and mean fractional flow reserve of SB (n = 12) was 0.88 ± 0.05. No major adverse cardiac events was noted in hospital and 12-month follow up. The mean CCS angina score was reduced by 84% (2.2 vs 0.4, p < .001). Conclusion. The hybrid strategy facilitates treatment of DCB and stent for bifurcation lesions, which appears to be feasible and acceptable in a short-term follow-up.

Comparison of adenosine-independent pressure indices to fractional flow reserve in stent-jailed bifurcation side branches.

This study aims to evaluate whether the high correlation and classification agreement of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and the resting distal coronary to aortic pressure ratio (Pd /Pa ) with the fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be confirmed in stent-jailed side branches (J-SB). Consecutive patients (n = 49) undergoing provisional stenting were prospectively enrolled and a physiological assessment of the J-SB (n = 51) was performed. FFR, iFR, and Pd /Pa were measured and the hemodynamic relevance was determined using cutoff values of ≤0.80, ≤0.89, and ≤0.92, respectively. Both iFR (r = 0.75) and Pd /Pa (r = 0.77) correlated closely with FFR. Classification agreement with FFR was 78% for iFR (81% sensitivity, 77% specificity) and 75% for Pd /Pa (63% sensitivity and 80% specificity). However, angiographic diameter stenosis and pressure indices correlated poorly. For a threshold of ≥70% stenosis, agreement concerning hemodynamic relevance was found in 59% for FFR, 69% for iFR, and 61% for Pd /Pa . As reported for other lesion types, FFR and the adenosine-independent pressure indices iFR and Pd /Pa show close correlation and a high classification agreement of approximately 75%-80% in J-SB. Therefore, iFR can be regarded as a recommendable alternative to FFR for the guidance of provisional stenting in bifurcation lesions.

Association of peri-procedural myocardial infarction with mortality after stenting true coronary bifurcation lesions: A pooled individual participant data analysis from four randomized controlled trials.

Five definitions of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are used in clinical trials; their clinical relevance in coronary bifurcation stenting remains unclear. To understand the correlation between PMI and mortality in bifurcation lesions from the DKCRUSH studies. PMI was defined using serum creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) values within 48 h of PCI according to the SYNTAX, Fourth Universal Definition of MI (4th UDMI), ISCHEMIA, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions. Overall, 1300 patients with both CK and CK-MB measurements pre- and post-stenting were evaluated. The association of each PMI type and all-cause death or cardiac death at a median of 5.58 years of follow-up was analyzed using Cox regression. In total, 56 (4.3%) patients had PMI. According to SYNTAX, 4th UDMI or ISCHEMIA, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions, PMI occurred in 21 (1.6%), 56 (4.3%), 29 (2.2%), and 32 (2.5%) patients, respectively. All definitions were significantly correlated with unadjusted mortality at the end of follow-up but not at 30 days or 1-year after stenting. PMI using SYNTAX, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions rather than 4th UDMI definition was strongly associated with adjusted all-cause death. By adjusted analysis, PMI according to 4th UDMI, SCAI, and EXCEL definitions but not SYNTAX definition was positively correlated with cardiac death at a median of 5.58 years of follow-up. CK-MB ≥ 5 x UNL strongly enhanced the correlation of CK-MB values with mortality. PMI rate varies with the definition following stenting for bifurcation lesions. PMI defined by SCAI and EXCEL definitions is strongly correlates with adjusted all-cause and cardiac death.

5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening.

The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB-opening procedure in patients with left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions including LM were selected from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry and divided into the simple crossover-alone group and SB-opening group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization). Among 2,194 patients who underwent the 1-stent strategy, 1,685 (76.8%) patients were treated with simple crossover alone, and 509 (23.2%) patients were treated with an additional SB-opening procedure. Although the baseline SB angiographic disease was more severe in the SB-opening group, the final lumen diameter of the SB was larger. The 5-year observed target lesion failure rate was similar between the 2 groups (7.0% in the simple crossover vs. 6.7% in SB-opening group; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.48; p=0.947), even in the subgroup analyses including LM (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p=0.442) and true bifurcation (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p=0.362). The results were not changed after an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. There was no difference in the overall and SB-related target lesion revascularization rate in both groups. The long-term clinical outcome of the 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions was acceptable compared to those of additional SB-opening procedures. (Korean Coronary BifurcationStenting [COBIS] Registry III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494).

Extreme Stent Malapposition after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions: An Optical Coherence Tomography

Anecdotal cases of bifurcation lesion stenting indicated that a wrong kissing Balloon Inflation (KBI) technique can lead to extreme stent malapposition with even stent crushing. The aim of this study was to quantify the occurrence of this finding, despite achieving acceptable angiographic results.

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Online 3-Dimensional Optical Frequency Domain Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions.

Clinical implications of online 3-dimensional optical frequency domain imaging (3D-OFDI)-guided stenting for bifurcation lesions have not been investigated in the randomized controlled trials. The purpose of this study was to determine whether online 3D-OFDI-guided stenting is superior to angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in terms of incomplete stent apposition at the bifurcation segment. The OPTIMUM trial (Online 3-Dimensional Optical Frequency Domain Imaging to Optimize Bifurcation Stenting Using UltiMaster Stent) was a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Eligible patients had an angiographically significant stenosis in the bifurcation lesion treated with a provisional single stent strategy using the Ultimaster sirolimus eluting stent. Patients were randomly allocated to either online 3D-OFDI-guided or angiography-guided PCI. Patients randomized to 3D-OFDI guidance underwent online 3D-OFDI assessment after rewiring into the jailed side branch after stenting and proximal optimization technique, while in the angiography guidance arm, rewiring was performed using conventional fluoroscopic/angiographic guidance. The primary end point of this trial was the postprocedural average percentage of malapposed struts per lesion assessed by OFDI in the confluence zone of the main and side branches. Between June 8, 2017 and September 26, 2018, 110 patients with 111 bifurcation lesions were randomized at 4 Japanese centers. Of these, 56 patients with 57 lesions were treated with 3D-OFDI-guided PCI, whereas 54 patients with 54 lesions were treated with angiography-guided PCI. In the 3D-OFDI guidance arm, the feasibility of online 3D-OFDI was 98.2%. The average percentage of incomplete stent apposition per lesion at bifurcation was lower in the 3D-OFDI guidance arm than that in the angiography guidance arm (19.5±15.8% versus 27.5±14.2%, P=0.008). The superiority of the 3D-OFDI guidance arm was also confirmed in the strut level analysis (odds ratio: 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.81]; P=0.003). Online 3D-OFDI-guided bifurcation PCI was superior to angiography-guided bifurcation PCI in terms of acute incomplete stent apposition at bifurcation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02972489.

Noncalcified plaque burden quantified from coronary computed tomography angiography improves prediction of side branch occlusion after main vessel stenting in bifurcation lesions: results from the CT-PRECISION registry

ObjectivesTo assess the incremental value of quantitative plaque features measured from computed tomography angiography (CTA) for predicting side branch (SB) occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention.MethodsWe included 340 patients with 377 bifurcation lesions in the post hoc analysis of the CT-PRECISION registry. Each bifurcation was divided into three segments: the proximal main vessel (MV), the distal MV, and the SB. Segments with evidence of coronary plaque were analyzed using semi-automated software allowing for quantitative analysis of coronary plaque morphology and stenosis. Coronary plaque measurements included calcified and noncalcified plaque volumes, and corresponding burdens (respective plaque volumes × 100%/vessel volume), remodeling index, and stenosis.ResultsSB occlusion occurred in 28 of 377 bifurcation lesions (7.5%). The presence of visually identified plaque in the SB segment, but not in the proximal and distal MV segments, was the only qualitative parameter that predicted SB occlusion with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792. Among quantitative plaque parameters calculated for the SB segment, the addition of noncalcified plaque burden (AUC 0.840, p = 0.003) and low-density plaque burden (AUC 0.836, p = 0.012) yielded significant improvements in predicting SB occlusion. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, optimal cut-offs for noncalcified plaque burden and low-density plaque burden were > 33.6% (86% sensitivity and 78% specificity) and > 0.9% (89% sensitivity and 73% specificity), respectively.ConclusionsCTA-derived noncalcified plaque burden, when added to the visually identified SB plaque, significantly improves the prediction of SB occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03709836 registered on October 17, 2018.

A Systematic Review of Jailed Balloon Technique for Coronary Bifurcation Lesion: Conventional-Jailed Balloon Technique vs Modified-Jailed Balloon Technique

BackgroundIn this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of conventional jailed balloon technique and modified jailed balloon technique for bifurcation lesion, and also whether the former or latter is more effective for preventing side branch occlusion during main branch stenting in bifurcation lesions. MethodsWe performed comprehensive search on studies assessing the efficacy and safety of conventional jailed balloon and modified jailed balloon technique for bifurcation lesion from several electronic databases. ResultsThere were 908 patients from six studies comprising of 615 in conventional jailed balloon technique group and 293 in modified jailed balloon technique group. Side branch loss was lower in modified jailed balloon technique group, however, the proportion of lesions with TIMI flow <3 in the final percutaneous coronary intervention result was somewhat higher in the modified jailed balloon technique group. The efficacy issue regarding side branch dissection was reported as high as 3.4%, especially at proximal stent edge in conventional jailed balloon technique group, but not quantitatively described in the modified jailed balloon technique group. Zero percent major adverse cardiovascular events at 9–12 months follow up was demonstrated in modified jailed balloon technique group, and 1–5% in the conventional jailed balloon group at a longer observation period up to 2.7 years. ConclusionOur study showed that modified jailed balloon technique is potentially better compared to conventional jailed balloon in terms of side branch loss, dissection, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Further controlled studies are warranted for definite conclusion.

A Systematic Literature Review of Three Stenting Strategies for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Artery Disease.

BackgroundBifurcation lesions represent 15–20% of all patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease. The provisional 1-stent stenting strategy is the preferred strategy to treat bifurcation lesions. Other strategies used to treat bifurcation lesions include 2-stent complex stenting strategies and the Tryton Side Branch Stent® (TSB)—a dedicated side-branch stent for bifurcation lesions, which gained FDA approval in March 2017.ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic literature review of the safety and effectiveness of three stenting strategies (provisional, complex, and Tryton Side Branch Stent®) for bifurcation lesions with a side-branch diameter ≥2.25 mm, undergoing PCI.MethodsLiterature searches in Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase were conducted to identify prospective clinical trials from January 2007–July 2017.Results602 articles were identified. Nine articles (6275 patients) met all inclusion criteria. Seven studies (5282 patients) compared provisional to complex stenting strategies. Two studies (993 patients) compared provisional to the TSB. Outcomes of interest reported were target vessel failure in 2 studies, major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target legion revascularization TLR) in 5 studies. For target vessel failure, the provisional strategy ranged from 5.6% to 15.6 %; complex at 7.2% (one study); and TSB from 11.3% to 17.4%. For MACE, provisional strategy ranged from 8%–13.2%; complex from 11.9%–15.2%; and TSB from 8.2%–18.6%.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first review comparing three bifurcation lesion stenting strategies. Significant heterogeneity in the study design of the nine studies reviewed prevented a meta-analysis. A clinical trial comparing the TSB to both the provisional and complex strategies would provide better inference on the safety and effectiveness when comparing strategies.

A Systematic Literature Review of Three Stenting Strategies for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Bifurcation lesions represent 15-20% of all patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease. The provisional 1-stent stenting strategy is the preferred strategy to treat bifurcation lesions. Other strategies used to treat bifurcation lesions include 2-stent complex stenting strategies and the Tryton Side Branch Stent® (TSB)—a dedicated side-branch stent for bifurcation lesions, which gained FDA approval in March 2017. Objectives: To conduct a systematic literature review of the safety and effectiveness of three stenting strategies (provisional, complex, and Tryton Side Branch Stent®) for bifurcation lesions with a side-branch diameter ≥2.25 mm, undergoing PCI. Methods: Literature searches in Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase were conducted to identify prospective clinical trials from January 2007-July 2017. Results: 602 articles were identified. Nine articles (6275 patients) met all inclusion criteria. Seven studies (5282 patients) compared provisional to complex stenting strategies. Two studies (993 patients) compared provisional to the TSB. Outcomes of interest reported were target vessel failure in 2 studies, major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target legion revascularization TLR) in 5 studies. For target vessel failure, the provisional strategy ranged from 5.6% to 15.6 %; complex at 7.2% (one study); and TSB from 11.3% to 17.4%. For MACE, provisional strategy ranged from 8%-13.2%; complex from 11.9%-15.2%; and TSB from 8.2%-18.6%. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first review comparing three bifurcation lesion stenting strategies. Significant heterogeneity in the study design of the nine studies reviewed prevented a meta-analysis. A clinical trial comparing the TSB to both the provisional and complex strategies would provide better inference on the safety and effectiveness when comparing strategies.

BIFURCATION LESION STENTING AND IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK

Percutaneous stenting of bifurcation lesions remains challenging despite advancements in technology and technique. Previous studies have demonstrated an association of bifurcation lesion stenting with lower success rates and higher rates of complications, compared to non-bifurcation lesion stenting

Assessment of Predictors of Side Branch Occlusion after Main Vessel Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

To determine the frequency of side branch (SB) occlusion during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting of bifurcation lesions and to assess the predictors of side branch occlusion in local population. Cross-sectional study. Cardiac Catheterization Lab, Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology, Rawalpindi, from July 2016 to January 2017. A total of 200 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study with non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Variables like diameters and lesion lengths of main vessel and side branch were recorded using quantitative coronary analysis software (QCA). The SB occlusion was defined as <3 TIMI score following main vessel PCI with stenting. The data was analysed using SPSS version 21.0. Mean age (years) of the study population was 52.27 ±13.33 including 180 (90.0%) male and 20 (10.0%) female patients. SB occlusion was observed in 15 (7.5%) of cases. Mean SB diameter was significantly larger in cases without SB occlusion than those with SB occlusion (2.06 ±0.09 vs. 2.17 ±0.26, p=0.003). Similarly, SB lesions were significantly shorter in length in those without SB occlusion than those with SB occlusion (3.53 ±0.51 and 4.66 ±3.11, p<0.001). However, mean MV diameter (mm) and mean MV lesions length (mm) in both the groups were statistically not significant. Mean SB diameter and lesion length are useful predictors of SB occlusion during stenting of bifurcation lesions in the local population.

Benefit of Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stent for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Results From the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry II.

Whether prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) improves clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation lesion is uncertain. We evaluated 2082 patients who were treated with drug-eluting stent for bifurcation lesions and were event free (no death, myocardial infarction [MI], cerebrovascular accident, stent thrombosis, or any revascularization) at 12 months after the index procedure. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DAPT ≥12-month group (n=1776) and DAPT <12-month group (n=306). Primary outcome was all-cause death or MI. At 4 years after the index procedure, death or MI occurred less frequently in the DAPT ≥12-month group than the DAPT <12-month group (2.8% versus 12.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.35; P<0.001). After propensity score matching, incidence of death or MI was still lower in the DAPT ≥12-month group than the DAPT <12-month group (2.6% versus 12.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.38; P<0.001). In subgroup analysis, the treatment effect of prolonged DAPT was consistent across subgroups regardless of lesion location, stenting technique, or type of used drug-eluting stent. The risk of all-cause death or MI was significantly lower in the ≥12-month DAPT group than the <12-month DAPT group after percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesion using drug-eluting stent. Our results suggest that prolonged DAPT may improve long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01642992.

IN-HOSPITAL OUTCOME OF INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION OF A BIFURCATION LESION: ANALYSIS FROM NATIONAL INPATIENT SAMPLE (NIS)

Intravascular ultrasound use during coronary bifurcation lesion stenting may improve stent strut apposition, decrease stent underexpansion and improve peri-procedural outcomes. We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2009 -2014 using ICD-9-CM procedure codes to identify

Prewire channel stent: a novel stent for bifurcation lesions in a pig model

Avoiding side branch occlusion is challenging when treating bifurcation lesions. A newly designed stent system called the prewire channel stent (PWCS) with a side channel positioned between the metallic mesh material and the balloon is introduced. We aimed to compare the time taken to position the PWCS against that for a conventional stent. The PWCS and a conventional stent were used in a pig model. The time taken from the starting point with the stent outside the body to reaching the bifurcation of the vessel ready for further procedures such as balloon dilatation through the stent mesh opening and double kissing balloon technique, etc., was compared in the conventional stent and PWCS groups. The time taken in the PWCS stent group included the time from sending the stent from outside the body to the desired position of the bifurcation of the vessels of the heart, releasing the stent and pulling back the balloon (SB time). The time taken in the conventional stent included the time from sending the stent from outside the body to the desired position of the bifurcation of the vessels of the heart, releasing the stent, pulling back the balloon (SB time), and wire exchange (WE time). The SB times for the PWCS and the conventional stent groups were not different (28.5±3.8 vs. 25.25±0.75 seconds, n=4). The PWCS group did not have "wire exchange," and had no WE time, which was 28.5±5.7 seconds in the conventional stent group. The total time spent in the PWCS group was 28.5±3.8 seconds, which was shorter than the 53.75±6.2 seconds (n=4, p<0.05) in the conventional stent group. The PWCS makes "wire exchange" in the side branch (SB) unnecessary and it can be as easily manipulated as a conventional stent.

Impact of non-compliant balloons on long-term clinical outcomes in coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation Stent) II registry

Non-compliant balloons provide uniform radial force along the vessel wall at any inflation pressure. As a result, the use of non-compliant balloons may reduce side branch complications and optimise stent deployment. We sought to investigate the impact of non-compliant balloons on the long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a coronary bifurcation intervention. A total of 2,897 patients treated with drug-eluting stents for bifurcation lesions were enrolled. Non-compliant balloons were used in 752 patients (26%). During a median three-year follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularisation) occurred less frequently in the non-compliant balloon group than in the compliant balloon group (8.2% versus 10.9%; p=0.03). After propensity score matching (710 pairs), the use of non-compliant balloons resulted in a lower rate of side branch dissection (0.1% versus 1.1%; p=0.046) and a higher rate of procedural success (79.0% versus 73.9%; p=0.01). The use of non-compliant balloons was associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.91; p=0.01) and cardiac death (HR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.64; p=0.01). The use of non-compliant balloons was associated with favourable procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in patients receiving coronary bifurcation intervention.