Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Research Articles

Predictors of distal embolization during thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel bifurcation occlusion stroke.

Distal embolization is a frequent complication of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke, often leading to poor clinical outcomes. The vascular bifurcations represent a specialized anatomical location, thereby augmenting the complexity of MT. The specific factors contributing to distal embolization in this context have not been thoroughly explored. This study seeks to identify the factors associated with distal embolization during MT in patients with anterior circulation large vessel bifurcation occlusion stroke. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent MT for acute anterior circulation bifurcation occlusion stroke between January 2015 and December 2023. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of distal embolization during MT. The study included 119 patients. Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between distal embolization and occlusion location, internal carotid artery (ICA) tortuosity, first-line thrombectomy strategy, and the number of device passes. Multivariate analysis identified ICA bifurcation occlusions (odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.188 to 8.672, P=0.021), stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) (OR 6.177, 95% CI 1.77 to 21.555, P=0.004), and a higher number of device passes (OR 1.778, 95% CI 1.132 to 2.792, P=0.013) as independent predictors of distal embolization. ICA bifurcation occlusion, the use of SRT, and an increased number of device passes are significant predictors of distal embolization during MT in patients with anterior circulation large vessel bifurcation occlusion strokes.

Endovascular treatment for proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease: A retrospective single-center case series

ObjectiveTo compare treatment outcomes between patients who received a front-line stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) or first stenting without retrieval (FRESH) for treating proximal M1 occlusion due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) between January 2017 and August 2021 at Yeungnam University Medical Center. LVO in the anterior circulation was classified according to etiology as follows: Embolic group and ICAD group. Occlusion of the proximal M1 due to ICAD were enrolled in this study. The ICAD group was divided into SRT and FRESH groups according to the treatment method. ResultsAmong the 72 patients in the ICAD group, 55 patients had occlusion of the M1, and 27 had occlusion of the proximal M1 (27/55, 49.1 %). Among the 27 patients, 11 (40.7 %) underwent SRT and 16 (59.3 %) underwent FRESH. The puncture-to-recanalization time was significantly shorter in the FRESH group (28 min vs. 52 min, p = 0.023). Symptomatic ICH tended to occur more frequently in the SRT group than in the FRESH group (27.3 % vs. 0.0 %, p=0.056). There was a nonsignificant trend towards a good functional outcome in the FRESH group compared to the SRT group (81.3 % vs. 45.5 %, p=0.097). ConclusionIn the FRESH group, the puncture-to-recanalization time was significantly shorter, symptomatic ICH tended to occur less frequently, and good functional outcomes were more common.

Development of physiologically relevant synthetic thrombus for use in visual analysis of in vitro mechanical thrombectomy device testing

BackgroundIschemic stroke is a leading cause of death and significant long-term disability worldwide. Mechanical thrombectomy is emerging as a standard treatment for eligible patients. As clinical implementation of stent retrieval...

Association of first-line thrombectomy technique and outcome in late-window large vessel occlusion strokes: A post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial.

This study aimed to compare direct aspiration, stent retriever, and the combined thrombectomy technique on clinical, safety, and technical outcomes in late-window stroke patients included in the MR CLEAN-LATE trial. This post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial included patients treated with direct aspiration, stent retriever, or combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach. Primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days follow-up, and compared between the three groups with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 90 days, total technique switches, procedure time, recanalization rate measured with the expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Predefined variables were used for adjustments. In the MR CLEAN-LATE trial, 258 patients underwent endovascular treatment and 232 were included in our analyses. The mRS at 90 days did not differ (stent retriever vs. direct aspiration: adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) = 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73 to 2.50; stent retriever vs. combined: acOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.00; direct aspiration vs. combined: acOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.21). Direct aspiration thrombectomy was accompanied with more switches to another technique compared to the stent retriever (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.52 to 16.8) or combined group (aOR = 4.67, 95% CI = 1.80 to 12.1) and with higher sICH rates compared to the combined technique (13% vs. 2.5%; aOR = 8.19, 95% CI = 1.49 to 45.1). Mortality, procedure time, and eTICI did not differ. Stent retriever, direct aspiration, or the combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach showed no differences in clinical outcome in late-window stroke patients. Direct aspiration was accompanied with higher sICH rates and more switcher to another technique compared to the combined group.

Clot patterns determined by DSA and CTA can help predict intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in acute ischemic stroke patients.

This study examines whether clot patterns at large artery occlusion sites, as observed using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA), can reliably indicate intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated with stent retriever thrombectomy for intracranial occlusions at our institute since 2017, with follow-up assessments conducted at 3 months. The patients were grouped based on the initial angiography clot topographies (i.e., cut-off or tapered signs). We assessed the potential of these topographies in predicting ICAS, including a clinical outcome analysis based on clot pattern, age, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification, and onset-to-door time. Among 131 patients (with a mean age of 66.6 years), the clot pattern emerged as a significant predictor of ICAS. The DSA-based model had a predictive area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, with 55.1% sensitivity and 94.0% specificity. A multivariate model including age, onset-to-door time, TOAST classification as large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and the presence of the tapered sign in clot patterns had an AUC of 0.916. In patients over 65 years of age with an onset-to-door time of >5 h and exhibiting a tapered sign in the clot pattern, the AUC reached 0.897. The predictive ability of the tapered sign was similar in DSA and CTA, showing 73.4% agreement between modalities. The clot pattern with the tapered sign as observed using DSA is significantly associated with ICAS. Incorporating this clot pattern with age, TOAST classification as LAA, and onset-to-door time enhances the prediction of ICAS. The clot pattern identified by CTA is also a reliable predictor, highlighting the importance of assessing clot patterns in ICAS identification.

MINT Registry: Rationale and Study Design

Background Mechanical thrombectomy has become the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke secondary to large‐vessel occlusion up to 24 hours from last known normal time. Multiple different techniques for mechanical thrombectomy have been described, including a direct aspiration first‐pass technique and stent retriever thrombectomy. With a direct aspiration first‐pass technique, classically, a large‐bore aspiration catheter is delivered over a microcatheter and microwire to the clot. Recently, a novel macrowire has been introduced as a potential alternative to the use of microwire–microcatheter to allow the delivery of the aspiration catheter. The aim of this study is to develop a multicenter registry comparing delivery of an aspiration catheter for intracranial thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to emergent large‐vessel occlusion over a macrowire in comparison with traditional use of microcatheter and microwire. Methods MINT (Macrowire for Intracranial Thrombectomy) is a multicenter, observational study currently enrolling patients with large‐vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy using a macrowire to deliver the aspiration catheter to the intracranial occlusion. All the participating sites will screen and report cases on a monthly basis. The decision to use the macrowire and various aspiration catheters is at the discretion of the interventionalist. Results We will collect patient's clinical, demographic, and radiographic data. In addition, we plan to collect procedure variables and postprocedure clinical and imaging data. Outcomes include successful delivery of the reperfusion catheter to the clot interface, time taken from groin access to first pass, and a bailout strategy for thrombectomy in cases where this is not feasible. Conclusion The MINT registry will add to our understanding of safety and efficacy of this novel macrowire in intracranial thrombectomy. This registry will also highlight and allow for understanding in workflow improvements from simplifying setup and possibly cost effectiveness of this technique.

Aspiration only versus stent retriever only thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: a propensity score-matched analysis of the German Stroke Registry

BackgroundEndovascular treatment has become the standard care for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Uncertainty persists about the optimal thrombectomy technique.ObjectiveTo compare aspiration thrombectomy with stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with...

Endovascular treatment of embolism-related acute basilar artery occlusion stroke: ADAPT versus stent retriever thrombectomy.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) and stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) technique in embolism-related acute basilar artery occlusion (EMB-ABAO). We collected data from patients with EMB-ABAO in multiple stroke centers from January 2017 to February 2024. We defined two groups of enrolled patients, the ADAPT group and the SRT group. The primary outcome was the first attempt recanalization (FAR) rate. Secondary outcomes were the puncture to recanalization (PTR) time and the 90-day favorable functional outcome. The safety outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality rate. A total of 406 patients were screened for endovascular treatment (EVT) of ABAO ischemic stroke, and 108 patients were identified with EMB-ABAO stroke. Among these, 96 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 58 (60.42%) were in the ADAPT group, and 38 (39.58%) were in the SRT group. Compared with the SRT group, the ADAPT group achieved FAR more frequently (60.34% versus 39.47%; p = 0.045) and a higher 90-day favorable functional outcome rate (44.83% versus 36.84%; p = 0.438). The median PTR time of the ADAPT group was significantly shorter than that of the SRT group (42 versus 105 min; p < 0.001). In cases where EMB-ABAO is suspected, ADAPT was superior to SRT in terms of FAR rate and PTR time, but the 90-day mRS scores had no statistical significance. Given the reduced time to recanalization with ADAPT, an initial attempt at recanalization with ADAPT may be necessary before stent retriever. However, due to the study limitations, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and require further study.

Prospective evaluation to characterize the real-world performance of the EMBOVAC aspiration catheter for neurothrombectomy: a post-market clinical follow-up trial

BackgroundA direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) is an effective alternative to stent retriever thrombectomy for patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The PERFECT study evaluated direct aspiration with the...

Combined Aspiration and Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Distal Carotid Artery Occlusion Using Balloon Guide versus Non-Balloon Guide Catheter.

Background: The introduction of endovascular thrombectomy dramatically changed acute stroke management and became the standard treatment. Balloon guide catheters provide flow arrest during the clot retrieval process and have several advantages.This study aimed to compare balloon guide catheters (BGCs) versus non-balloon guide catheters (NBGCs) as a part of a combined treatment modality in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This retrospective study included n = 65 patients who underwent a combined endovascular stroke treatment for distal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. Patients underwent aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy with the use of BGCs (Group 1, n = 27) or NBGCs (Group 2, n = 38). Results: The groups were compared for outcomes: the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSSS) score change, successful recanalization, good functional outcome at three months, and in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: The two groups didn't differ in terms of the NIHSS score change compared to baseline (p > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the successful recanalization rate, three-month favorable functional outcome rate, and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.292, p = 0.952, p = 0.178), respectively. Further prospective studies with a larger number of patients and better methodology are warranted.

How does thrombo-aspiration compare with stent-retrieval thrombectomy for adults with acute ischemic stroke?

How does thrombo-aspiration compare with stent-retrieval thrombectomy for adults with acute ischemic stroke?

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Aseptic, Atraumatic, Medically Refractory Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: aSystematic Review.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) follows asevere clinical course in 13.5% of cases. Practice guidelines recommend endovascular therapy (EVT); no randomised control trials (RCTs) exist comparing EVTs. To determine whether specific EVTs are superior to alternatives. CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, five other databases and four clinical trials registers. Grey literature searches, reference checking, citation searching, and author contact. All CVST cases treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) were includible. Paediatric, and trauma-related or infection-related thromboses were excluded. Standard Cochrane review procedures. Primary outcome measures; clinical efficacy (modified Rankin Score, mRS), technical efficacy (recanalisation), and clinical safety (procedure-related complications and death). Subgroup analyses were performed, comparing outcome measures between demographic groups, clinico-radiological severity, interventional strategies, and degrees of recanalisation. In this study 124 papers were included (n = 486). All patients underwent MT, with 69.5% of patients receiving concomitant chemolysis. New/expanding intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) occurred in 5.1%; non-haemorrhagic complications in 1.4%; 10.7% died. Predictors of poor efficacy included age ≥ 55years, altered mental status (AMS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 8. Predictive of poor safety outcomes included pre-existing ICH, deep system thrombosis, and AMS. Complete recanalisation was associated with improved clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. The review is based on case reports/series, increasing bias-risk. Myriad of potentially includible studies were necessarily excluded due to lack of requisite details. Predictors of poor outcomes with medical therapy predict poor outcomes with MT; these measures should not dictate candidacy. Complete recanalisation predicts favorable clinical and safety outcomes. Local chemolysis is safe, improves recanalisation, and should be recommended, provided there is no contraindication. Clot maceration strategies and stent-retriever thrombectomy are associated with superior clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, as compared with balloon angioplasty and rheolysis.

A Study of Efficacy and Outcomes of Two Techniques of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract Background Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique [ADAPT] and Solitaire stent retrieval techniques) as an emergency reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients avoids secondary brain insult and thereby prevents permanent neurological deficits. As studies comparing the two thrombectomy procedures are scarce, we evaluated their efficacy. Methods In this prospective observational study done at Manipal Hospitals Bangalore, 75 patients were separated into two groups based on the final reperfusion technique employed: ADAPT group with 39 patients who underwent contact aspiration technique and Solitaire group with 36 patients who underwent stent retrieval thrombectomy. The rate of successful reperfusion (modified treatment in cerebral infarction scores [mTICI]); functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) at 24 hours, 1 month and 3 months postintervention; and the adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results Successful reperfusion was significantly higher in the ADAPT group. Mean NIHSS and mRS scores reduced significantly postintervention for both groups, but was greater for the ADAPT group, while mortality and other adverse events were significantly greater in the solitaire group. Conclusion Mechanical thrombectomy is an effective reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients. Comparing the two techniques revealed better outcomes for ADAPT, than stent retrieval technique.

Abstract WP179: Clinical Outcomes in Acute Stroke in Patients Undergoing Emergency Intracranial Stenting Receiving IV Thrombolysis

Background: Stent-retriever thrombectomy is the first-line therapy for acute stroke with intracranial large vessel occlusion. In cases of stent-retriever thrombectomy failure, rescue stent angioplasty might be the sole option for achieving permanent recanalization. This study aims to evaluate the safety of combined intracranial vessel stent placement and thrombolysis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with large vessel occlusion who underwent rescue stent angioplasty after stent-retriever thrombectomy between 2012 and 2023 in 8 neurovascular centers. We defined two binary outcomes: (1) functional clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and (2) early symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Clinical outcomes were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: A total of 216 patients were included, with target vessels located within the anterior circulation (133; 63.4%) and posterior circulation (79; 36.6%). Among patients who underwent emergency intracranial stenting, 66 (30.6%) received intravenous thrombolytic treatment. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender, baseline NIHSS, target vessel, time to recanalization, number of passes including, and type of antiplatelet therapy, intravenous thrombolytic therapy was not associated with symptomatic ICH (odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-4.14, p=0.9502), but it was associated with a functional clinical outcome at 90 days (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.11-10.43, p=0.0325). Conclusions: The use of rescue stent angioplasty can be considered after unsuccessful stent-retriever thrombectomy, along with intravenous thrombolytic therapy. Patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy before the procedure exhibited higher rates of good functional outcomes.

Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as a first-line approach for cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke in large vessels of the anterior circulation.

This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approaches for anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke. This retrospective observational study included patients with anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Patients were grouped according to the first-line approach they received: aspiration thrombectomy or stent retriever thrombectomy. The primary outcome measure was the change in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from preoperative to immediate postoperative and from preoperative to discharge. Secondary indicators included the rate of favorable prognosis at discharge [Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2], successful vessel recanalization rate [modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score ≥ 2b], time from successful femoral artery puncture to successful vessel recanalization, and perioperative complications. The study included 127 cases, with 1 case withdrawal after enrollment due to a stroke of another determined cause, with 83 in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 43 cases in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The change in NIHSS score from preoperative to immediate postoperative was 5 (1, 8) in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 1 (0, 4.5) in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The change from preoperative to discharge was 8 (5, 12) in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 4 (0, 9) in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The aspiration thrombectomy group exhibited significantly better prognosis rates and shorter time from successful femoral artery puncture to successful vessel recanalization. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of successful vessel recanalization rates and perioperative complications. As a first-line approach for anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke, aspiration thrombectomy leads to better improvement in neurological functional deficits and prognosis rates compared to stent retriever thrombectomy.

Disability-free outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials.

The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤2 (functional independence) has been the most common primary endpoint of modern mechanical thrombectomy (MT) trials. However, unlike mRS 0-1, mRS score of 2 indicates disability. An important proportion of the mRS 2 patients are home dependent and report a significant decrease in their quality of life. To investigate excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) rates after MT. We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the role of modern MT in acute ischemic stroke were screened. Posterior circulation and large-core infarct trials were excluded from the study. The data regarding excellent outcomes (mRS: 0-1), functional independence (mRS: 0-2), and reperfusion were collected. Twenty-two RCTs comprising 5692 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mRS 0-1 rate was 31.24% (95% CI = 26.95-36.2). The rate of successful reperfusion was 81.8% (95% CI = 77.93-85.86). MT achieved significantly higher rates of mRS 0-1 compared to standard care alone (OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.64-2.55; P-value < 0.001), with no heterogeneity detected among studies (I2= 0%; P-value = 0.52). The direct MT and MT plus intravenous thrombolytic treatment groups' excellent outcome rates were comparable (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.82-1.18; P-value = 0.863). Also, aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy techniques provided similar excellent outcome rates (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.55-1.05; P-value = 0.141). Our results prove the additional benefit of MT over standard care, using a stricter definition for favorable functional outcome. Nearly one-third of patients presenting with large artery occlusion and treated with MT had no disability at 90 days. While this is remarkable, our results also indicate that reperfusion alone is often not enough to prevent disability and underline the need for better neuroprotection strategies.

Aspiration Thrombectomy Versus Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for the First-Pass Therapy of Intracranial Atherosclerosis–Related Large Vessel Occlusion: A Post Hoc Analysis of The Endovascular Treatment With Versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Trial

BackgroundThis study sought to scrutinize the clinical outcomes associated with first-pass mechanical thrombectomy (MT) strategies in the management of intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO). MethodsWithin this post-hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT trial, we compared data pertaining to ICAS-LVO patients situated in the anterior circulation who underwent initial therapeutic interventions utilising either aspiration thrombectomy or stent-retriever thrombectomy. The analysis encompassed the assessment of intraprocedural recanalization, rescue procedures involving balloon angioplasty or stenting, 48-hour reocclusion rates, occurrences of cerebral hemorrhagic complications, and 90-day Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. ResultsAmong the 948 patients encompassed in the RESCUE BT trial, a total of 230 patients with ICAS-LVO in the anterior circulation were enrolled in the study. Of these, 111 underwent aspiration thrombectomy as the first-pass therapy, while 119 patients underwent stent-retriever thrombectomy as the initial intervention. The difference in first pass recanalization rates between aspiration thrombectomy and stent-retriever thrombectomy was not statistically significant (17.1% vs. 14.3%, p=0.555), and mechanical thrombectomy success rates (90.1% vs. 90.8%, p=0.864), the use of balloon angioplasty or stenting for rescue therapy (54.6% vs. 45.9%, p=0.189; 23.4% vs. 25.2%, p=0.752), and favorable 90-day mRS outcomes (53.2% vs. 40.3%, p=0.051) showed no statistically significant differences. ConclusionsBoth aspiration thrombectomy and stent-retriever thrombectomy can be considered as primary therapeutic options for patients presenting with ICAS-LVO in the anterior circulation.

Could emergency admission plasma D-dimer level predict first pass effect of stent retriever thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke?

Evidence on plasma biomarkers to identify first pass effect (FPE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with thrombectomy is limited. To evaluate whether plasma D-dimer could predict FPE. Consecutive patients with LVO who underwent first-line stent retriever thrombectomy at our center between January 2018 and August 2021 were enrolled. Patients were classified into the FPE (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] ≥2c) group or non-FPE (mTICI 0-2b) group based on angiographic outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of FPE. The overall ability of D-dimer levels in predicting FPE was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In total, 313 patients were included; 88 (28.1%) patients achieved FPE. Compared to those with non-FPE, patients with FPE had more diabetes mellitus history, lower D-dimer levels, higher clot burden score, a higher proportion of M1 middle cerebral artery, and a higher proportion of main stem occlusion pattern (P <0.05). After adjusting for potential variables, D-dimer levels (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.52-0.96), clot burden score (OR=1.76, 95% CI=1.38-2.87), and main stem occlusion pattern (OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.19-2.62) remained independently associated with FPE. Based on the ROC analysis, the D-dimer as a predictor for predicting FPE presented with a specificity of 79%, a negative predictive value of 87%, and an area under the curve of 0.761. Low emergency admission plasma D-dimer level is an independent predictor of FPE in patients with AIS treated with stent retriever thrombectomy.

The History of Endovascular Stroke Treatment: From Local Intraarterial Fibrinolysis to Stent Retriever Thrombectomy.

Background Acute thromboembolic occlusions of large intracranial arteries are associated with high rates of permanent disability and mortality. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in these patients resulted in an inadequate rate of recanalization and has had limited clinical success. Various endovascular procedures have been attempted to remove intracranial thrombi and reopen occluded vessels. These technical innovations led to the publication of initial case reports, but the methods ultimately did not endure. Endovascular treatment of acute cerebral ischemia was performed only rarely and in selected centers as part of individualized curative attempts. The Solitaire stent was originally developed to treat intracranial aneurysms through stent-assisted coil occlusion. The suggestion that this stent could also be used for intracranial thrombectomy was made as early as 2003 and was clinically confirmed in 2008. Releasing a Solitaire stent into an embolically occluded large cerebral artery, with an incubation time of approximately 3 minutes and slow retraction of the stent, has led to unprecedented success rates of thrombus removal and (sub)total recanalization in more than 90 % of patients. Methods This review article aimed to describe the steps in the development of endovascular stroke therapy, beginning with intra-arterial thrombolysis and early technical innovations leading to the eventual success of stent retriever thrombectomy. Conclusion The potential for mechanical recanalization of acutely occluded large cerebral arteries could not be fully exploited until the advent of stent retriever thrombectomy. The entire concept of stroke treatment fundamentally changed after complete and rapid recanalization first became possible. Randomized controlled trials have shown superiority of stent retriever thrombectomy over IVT. An unparalleled boom in endovascular stroke therapy followed. Key Points:

Pre-navigation balloon technique: Distal emboli protection during stent retriever thrombectomy

ObjectiveDuring stent retriever thrombectomy, a balloon guide catheter reduces distal emboli and consequently improves clinical outcomes. Because balloons are usually used before stent retrieval, these can affect the thrombus including the distal emboli while performing microcatheter navigation. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness and safety of the pre-navigation balloon technique during microcatheter and microwire navigation. MethodsPatients who underwent stent retriever thrombectomy secondary to an anterior circulation large-artery occlusion were retrospectively evaluated. The pre-navigation balloon technique was used, and the number of retrievals, procedure time, final recanalization, presence of distal emboli, first-pass effect (FPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage including procedure-related complications, and clinical outcomes at 3 months were evaluated. ResultsIn total 123 patients were analyzed, and occurrence of distal emboli was lesser in the pre-navigation balloon than in the non-preballoon group (4.4% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.02). No statistical difference was found in successful recanalization, mortality, and procedure-related complications. Moreover, the pre-navigation balloon group had a higher FPE than the non-balloon group (37.8% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.004). Although no statistical difference was found in the pre-navigation balloon group, a trend toward a higher rate of good clinical outcomes was observed (mRS 0–2 at 3 months, 55.6% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.09). For ICA occlusion(n = 35), significant effects were seen in decreasing distal embolism (0(0%) vs 3(16%), p = 0.01), increasing FPE (8(50%) vs 6(32%), p = 0.003), and improving clinical outcomes (mRS 0–2 at 3 months, 9(56%) vs 7(37%), p = 0.03) in the pre-navigation balloon group. In the multivariate analysis, lesser distal embolism (0.91 [0.80–1.00], p = 0.02), higher successful recanalization (3.52 [1.11–7.03], p = 0.016), and higher FPE (3.17 [1.83–7.37], p = 0.001) secondary to the procedure was a predictor of favorable clinical outcomes. ConclusionsThe pre-navigation balloon technique significantly reduced occurrence of distal embolism and increased the FPE.