Stent Retriever Technique Research Articles

Soft partial release of non-aggressive stent retriever technique for very distal arterial occlusion stroke.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for very distal vessel occlusion (DVO) stroke is increasingly performed but there is insufficient evidence on the efficacy and safety of distal EVT techniques. We hypothesized that the technique of soft partial release of non-aggressive stent retrievers (SPORNS) reduces friction on the perforating vessels during thrombectomy and thereby reduces bleeding complications. Retrospective study including consecutive DVO patients who were treated with the SPORNS technique between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022 at two tertiary stroke centers. DVOs were defined as isolated occlusions of the M3 and M4 segments of the middle cerebral artery, occlusions of the A2 and A3 segments of the anterior cerebral artery, and occlusions of the P2 and P3 segments of the posterior cerebral artery or of the superior cerebellar artery. The technique is described in detail and procedural and clinical outcomes are given. Twenty-four patients were treated with the SPORNS technique of whom 22 (92%) had complete or near complete recanalization (eTICI 2c/3). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) decreased from a median of nine (IQR 7-13) at admission to three (1-5) at discharge and 18 patients (75%) achieved a good outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at day 90 post-stroke. Two patients (8%) had a small subarachnoid hemorrhage and two patients (8%) had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage on follow-up imaging. For the treatment of very distal arterial occlusions, the SPORNS technique employing a soft partial release of a non-aggressive stent retriever is safe and effective for the thrombectomy of small clots. The technique potentially yields a lower rate of subarachnoid hemorrhages while achieving an excellent rate of complete and first-pass recanalization.

Iatrogenic emboli during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: comparison between stent retriever technique and contact aspiration-a retrospective case-control study.

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion (LVO). While embolization to a new territory (ENT) after MT is well-documented, data on embolization in the same distal territory (EDT) are limited. Achieving modified Treatment In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3 reperfusion presents significant clinical benefits over mTICI 2b/2c, necessitating strategies to reduce both ENT and EDT. Previous studies suggest higher rates of EDTs with contact aspiration compared with stentrievers. However, comprehensive comparison studies in clinical practice are scarce. This study compares the rates of overall clot emboli (OCE) between these MT strategies. A retrospective, multicenter observational study was conducted at four university hospitals in France from January 2015 to November 2019. Adult patients (≥18 years) with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO, treated with either contact aspiration (ADAPT, A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique) or stentrievers, specifically using the Embotrap device to maintain sample homogeneity, were included. Digital subtraction angiography was used for imaging, with two independent, blinded reviewers assessing OCE post-first MT pass. Propensity score full matching and independent sample testing were employed to evaluate OCE after the first MT pass. A significant difference in OCE rates was observed between contact aspiration and stentriever techniques, with the stentriever technique resulting in fewer embolic events compared with ADAPT, based on a propensity score analysis that accounts for key confounding factors. A statistically significant reduction in embolic events was observed with the stentriever technique compared with contact aspiration. These results suggest that the stentriever method may offer a safer profile in terms of embolic risk for LVO interventions, and should be considered over contact aspiration when embolic risk is a primary concern, while also considering individual patient factors.

Stent Retriever versus Contact Aspiration in Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke; Egyptian Experience

Abstract Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard treatment in patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). It can be classified into thrombo-aspiration, stent-retrieval, and aspiration-retriever combined technique. The evidence on the optimal therapy with acceptable outcomes of safety and efficacy is still limited. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare between stent retriever versus aspiration techniques in MT regarding procedural safety and incidence of complications. Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals, Egypt. One hundred patients admitted to stroke unit with anterior circulation AIS who met inclusion criteria for MT were recruited over three years from March 2020 to March 2023. The included patients were divided into two groups: group one included 50 patients treated with stent retriever and group two included 50 patients treated with contact aspiration thrombectomy. Results The median (IQR) for age was 64 (52.5 – 71.5) years. 53 (53%) were males and 47 (47%) were females. No significant difference was found between the compared techniques regarding procedure time (p-value=0.551), time to recanalization (p-value=0.090), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score (TICI) (p-value=0.461. Conclusion Among patients with ischemic stroke in anterior circulation undergoing MT, contact aspiration and stent retriever were comparable regarding successful recanalization rate.

Impact of double stent retriever configuration on first-pass effect in stroke: a multicenter study

BackgroundEfficient recanalization of occluded cerebral arteries is crucial in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Double stent retrievers have shown the potential to enhance the rates of recanalization on the...

Association of first-line thrombectomy technique and outcome in late-window large vessel occlusion strokes: A post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial.

This study aimed to compare direct aspiration, stent retriever, and the combined thrombectomy technique on clinical, safety, and technical outcomes in late-window stroke patients included in the MR CLEAN-LATE trial. This post hoc analysis of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial included patients treated with direct aspiration, stent retriever, or combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach. Primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days follow-up, and compared between the three groups with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 90 days, total technique switches, procedure time, recanalization rate measured with the expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Predefined variables were used for adjustments. In the MR CLEAN-LATE trial, 258 patients underwent endovascular treatment and 232 were included in our analyses. The mRS at 90 days did not differ (stent retriever vs. direct aspiration: adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) = 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73 to 2.50; stent retriever vs. combined: acOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.00; direct aspiration vs. combined: acOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.21). Direct aspiration thrombectomy was accompanied with more switches to another technique compared to the stent retriever (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.52 to 16.8) or combined group (aOR = 4.67, 95% CI = 1.80 to 12.1) and with higher sICH rates compared to the combined technique (13% vs. 2.5%; aOR = 8.19, 95% CI = 1.49 to 45.1). Mortality, procedure time, and eTICI did not differ. Stent retriever, direct aspiration, or the combined thrombectomy technique as first-line approach showed no differences in clinical outcome in late-window stroke patients. Direct aspiration was accompanied with higher sICH rates and more switcher to another technique compared to the combined group.

Safety and efficacy of stent retrievers plus contact aspiration in patients with acute ischaemic anterior circulation stroke and positive susceptibility vessel sign in France (VECTOR): a randomised, single-blind trial

Positive susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke has been associated with friable red blood cell-rich clots and more effective recanalisation using stent retrievers versus contact aspiration. We compared the safety and efficacy of stent retrievers plus contact aspiration (combined technique) versus contact aspiration alone as the first-line thrombectomy technique in patients with acute ischaemic anterior circulation stroke and SVS-positive occlusions. Adaptive Endovascular Strategy to the Clot MRI in Large Intracranial Vessel Occlusion (VECTOR) was a prospective, randomised, open-label study with blinded evaluation. Patients with SVS-positive anterior circulation occlusions on pretreatment MRI and arterial puncture within 24 h of symptom onset were enrolled from 22 centres in France. A centralised web-based method was used by interventional neuroradiologists for dynamic randomisation by minimisation. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the combined technique or contact aspiration alone. The primary outcome was expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) grade 2c or 3 reperfusion after three or fewer passes on post-treatment angiogram, adjudicated by a blinded independent central imaging core laboratory. The intention-to-treat population was used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04139486) and is complete. Between Nov 26, 2019, and Feb 14, 2022, 526 patients were enrolled, of whom 521 constituted the intention-to-treat population (combined technique, n=263; contact aspiration alone, n=258). The median age of participants was 74·9 years (IQR 64·4-83·3); 284 (55%) were female and 237 (45%) male. The primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups (152 [58%] of 263 patients for the combined technique vs 135 [52%] of 258 for contact aspiration; odds ratio [OR] 1·27; 95% CI 0·88-1·83; p=0·19). Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 32 (12%) of 263 patients in the combined technique group and 27 (11%) of 257 in the contact aspiration group (OR 1·14; 0·65-2·00; p=0·65). The most common adverse event was intracerebral haemorrhage (146 [56%] of 259 patients for the combined technique vs 123 [49%] of 251 for contact aspiration; OR 1·32; 0·91-1·90; p=0·13). All-cause mortality at 3 months occurred in 57 (23%) of 251 patients in the combined technique group and 48 (19%) of 247 in the contact aspiration group (OR 1·19; 0·76-1·86; p=0·45), none of which was treatment-related. The results of the VECTOR trial do not show superiority of the combined stent retriever plus contact aspiration technique over contact aspiration alone in patients with SVS-positive occlusion with respect to achieving eTICI 2c-3 within three passes. These findings support the use of either the combined technique or contact aspiration alone as the initial thrombectomy strategy in patients with acute anterior circulation stroke with SVS on pretreatment MRI. Cerenovus.

A Study of Efficacy and Outcomes of Two Techniques of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract Background Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique [ADAPT] and Solitaire stent retrieval techniques) as an emergency reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients avoids secondary brain insult and thereby prevents permanent neurological deficits. As studies comparing the two thrombectomy procedures are scarce, we evaluated their efficacy. Methods In this prospective observational study done at Manipal Hospitals Bangalore, 75 patients were separated into two groups based on the final reperfusion technique employed: ADAPT group with 39 patients who underwent contact aspiration technique and Solitaire group with 36 patients who underwent stent retrieval thrombectomy. The rate of successful reperfusion (modified treatment in cerebral infarction scores [mTICI]); functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) at 24 hours, 1 month and 3 months postintervention; and the adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results Successful reperfusion was significantly higher in the ADAPT group. Mean NIHSS and mRS scores reduced significantly postintervention for both groups, but was greater for the ADAPT group, while mortality and other adverse events were significantly greater in the solitaire group. Conclusion Mechanical thrombectomy is an effective reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients. Comparing the two techniques revealed better outcomes for ADAPT, than stent retrieval technique.

First‐Line Stent Retriever Versus Contact Aspiration or Combined Technique for Endovascular Therapy of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The PLATO Study

BackgroundThe optimal reperfusion technique in patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusion is uncertain. We compared clinical and technical outcomes with first‐line stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined techniques in patients with isolated PCA occlusion.MethodsThis international case–control study was conducted at 30 sites in Europe and North America and included consecutive patients with isolated PCA occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2015 to August 2022. The primary outcome was the first‐pass effect (FPE), defined as expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c/3 on the first pass. Patients treated with SR, CA, or combined technique were compared with multivariable logistic regression.ResultsThere were 326 patients who met inclusion criteria, 56.1% male, median age 75 (interquartile range 65–82) years, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 8 (5–12). Occlusion segments were PCA‐P1 (53.1%), P2 (40.5%), and other (6.4%). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 39.6%. First‐line technique was SR, CA, and combined technique in 43 (13.2%), 106 (32.5%), and 177 (54.3%) patients, respectively; FPE was achieved in 62.8%, 42.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. FPE was lower in patients treated with first‐line CA or combined technique compared with SR (CA versus SR: adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [0.19–1.06];P=0.07; combined versus SR: adjusted odds ratio 0.35 [0.016–0.80];P=0.01). There were lower odds of functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0–2) in the first‐line CA versus SR alone group (adjusted odds ratio 0.52 [0.28–0.95];P=0.04). FPE was associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin scale score 0–2: 58% versus 43.4%;P=0.01; modified Rankin scale score 0–1: 36.6% versus 25.8%;P=0.05). Overall, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was present in 5.6% (18/326) and mortality in 10.9% (35/326) without difference between first‐line technique.ConclusionIn patients with isolated PCA occlusion, SR was associated with a higher rate of FPE compared with CA or combined techniques with no difference in final successful reperfusion. Functional independence at 90 days was more likely with first‐line SR compared with CA. FPE was associated with better 90‐day clinical outcomes.

Abstract 233: First‐line Techniques for Endovascular Therapy of Primary Distal medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Matched Analysis

Introduction Previous studies did not show a difference in terms of safety and efficacy among first‐line stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined techniques for proximal large vessel occlusion strokes. However, the optimal reperfusion therapy in patients with primary distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) strokes is uncertain. We aimed to compare the clinical and procedural outcomes among first‐line SR, CA and combined techniques in patients with primary DMVO. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database from 14 comprehensive stroke centers in the US and Europe. Patients were included if they had a primary DMVO stroke due to MCA‐M3/M4, ACA‐A1/A2‐3, or PCA‐P1/P2‐3 and underwent mechanical thrombectomy with first‐line SR, CA, or combined technique. The primary outcome was FPE defined as eTICI 2c/3 on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included mFPE defined as eTICI 2b/3 on the first pass, successful reperfusion defined as eTICI 2b/3 at the end of the procedure. Clinical outcomes included 90‐day mRS0‐1 and 90‐day mRS0‐2. Safety measures included procedural complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90‐day mortality. The secondary analysis aimed to identify the procedural and clinical outcomes in 3 matched cohorts: (SR vs. CA), (SR vs. combined technique), and (CA vs. combined technique). Results A total of 365 patients were eligible for analysis; 38.1% were female, with a mean age of 69.3 years and a median NIHSS score of 11 [7‐18]. The first‐line SR group consisted of n=74 (20.3%), CA group n=142 (38.9%), and combined technique group n=149 (40.8%). Patients with first‐line SR or combined technique had a lower median NIHSS score, less frequent MCA‐M3 segment occlusion, and less usage of the rescue strategy compared to those with first‐line CA, P<0.05. Patients with first‐line CA had less frequent BGC usage and lower rates of FPE and procedural complications compared to first‐line SR or combined technique, P<0.05. Successful reperfusion at the end of the procedure was similar among the 3 groups (Figure). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in terms of primary, secondary outcomes, or safety measures among the 3 first‐line techniques, except for higher procedural complications in patients who underwent the first‐line combined technique compared to those with first‐line CA (aOR 3.66, 95% CI [1.25‐10.75], P=0.02). The matched analyses did not show any difference in the primary outcome: (1) (SR, n=54 vs. CA, n=54) FPE; 31.5% vs. 26.9%, P=0.61, aOR 1.33, 95% CI [0.57‐3.11], P=0.52), (2) (SR, n=72 vs. combined technique, n=54) FPE; 37.5% vs. 31.9%, P=0.48, aOR 1.48, 95% CI [0.73‐3.03], P=0.28), and (3) (CA, n=109 vs. combined technique, n=109) FPE; 24.1% vs. 25.7%, P=0.78, aOR 0.94, 95% CI [0.50‐1.74], P=0.84). Similarly, there was no difference in terms of secondary outcomes and safety measures. Conclusion Our study suggests that in patients with primary DMVO, first‐line SR, CA, and combined techniques have a similar rate of FPE with no differences in final reperfusion or clinical outcomes. Randomized clinical trials are warranted

Abstract 012: First‐line Stent Retriever Versus Contact Aspiration or Combined Technique for Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion EVT

Introduction The optimal reperfusion technique in patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusion is uncertain. Previous studies in LVO and MeVO have demonstrated a correlation between good clinical outcomes and the first pass effect (FPE, eTICI 2c/3 on the first pass) but no differences in FPE rates or clinical outcomes between first‐line endovascular therapy techniques.1‐6 We compared clinical and technical outcomes with first‐line stent‐retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined techniques in patients with isolated PCA occlusion. Methods This international cohort study was conducted at 30 sites in Europe and North America and included consecutive patients with isolated PCA occlusion and pre‐stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0‐3, presenting within 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2015 to August 2022.7 The primary outcome was the first‐pass effect (FPE), defined as eTICI 2c/3 on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included final successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b‐3), 90‐day excellent outcome (mRS 0 to 1), 90‐day functional independence (mRS 0 to 2), sICH, and 90‐day mortality. Patients treated with SR, CA, or combined technique were compared with multivariable logistic regression. This study was registered under NCT05291637. Results There were 326 patients who met inclusion criteria, consisting of 56.1% male, median age 75 (IQR 65‐82) years and median NIHSS 8 (5‐12). Occlusion segments were PCA P1 (53.1%), P2 (40.5%), and other (6.4%). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 39.6%. First‐line technique was SR, CA, and combined technique in 43 (13.2%), 106 (32.5%), and 177 (54.3%) patients, respectively; FPE was achieved in 62.8%, 42.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. Compared to SR, FPE was lower in patients treated with first‐line combined technique and similar in patients treated with first‐line CA (combined vs. SR: aOR 0.35 [0.016‐0.80], p=0.01; CA vs. SR: aOR 0.45 [0.19‐1.06], p=0.07). Final successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b‐3) was present in 81% of cases with no differences between treatment groups. Excellent outcome (mRS 0‐1) occurred in 30.7% of patients and functional independence (mRS 0‐2) occurred in 50.0% of patients. There were lower odds of functional independence in the first‐line CA versus SR alone group (aOR 0.52 [0.28‐0.95], p=0.04). FPE was associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes (mRS 0‐2: 58% vs. 43.4%, p=0.01; mRS 0‐1: 36.6% vs. 25.8%, p=0.05). sICH was observed in 5.6% (18/326) and mortality in 10.9% (35/326) with no differences between first‐line technique. Conclusion In patients with isolated PCA occlusion undergoing EVT, first line SR was associated with a higher rate of FPE compared to CA or combined techniques with no difference in final successful reperfusion. Functional independence at 90‐days was more likely with first‐line SR compared to CA in adjusted analyses. FPE was associated with higher rates of 90‐day excellent outcomes and functional independence. No difference in sICH or mortality was noted across the three techniques. As the endovascular field evolves to treat patients with distal vessel occlusion and milder severity of stroke, optimizing the efficacy and safety of the procedure is essential.8

Safety and effectiveness of the modified stent retrieval technique in elderly patients with secondary distal vessel occlusion

Safety and effectiveness of the modified stent retrieval technique in elderly patients with secondary distal vessel occlusion

Effect of Bridging Thrombolysis on the Efficacy of Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Techniques : Insights from the SWIFT-DIRECT trial.

There are little available data regarding the influence of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on the efficacy of different first line endovascular treatment (EVT) techniques. We used the dataset of the SWIFT-DIRECT trial which randomized 408 patients to IVT + EVT or EVT alone at 48international sites. The protocol required the use of astent retriever (SR), but concomitant use of aballoon guide catheter (BGC) and/or distal aspiration (DA) catheter was left to the discretion of the operators. Four first line techniques were applied in the study population: SR, SR + BGC, SR + DA, SR + DA + BGC. To assess whether the effect of allocation to IVT + EVT versus EVT alone was modified by the first line technique, interaction models were fitted for predefined outcomes. The primary outcome was first pass mTICI2c‑3 reperfusion (FPR). This study included 385 patients of whom 172 were treated with SR + DA, 121 with SR + DA + BGC, 57with SR + BGC and 35with SR. There was no evidence that the effect of IVT + EVT versus EVT alone would be modified by the choice of first line technique; however, allocation to IVT + EVT increased the odds of FPR by afactor of 1.68 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.11-2.54). This post hoc analysis does not suggest treatment effect heterogeneity of IVT + EVT vs EVT alone in different stent retriever techniques but provides evidence for increased FPR if bridging IVT is administered before stent retriever thrombectomy.

The proximal balloon occlusion together with direct thrombus aspiration (protect plus) technique: Experience at a tertiary comprehensive stroke center.

Timely restoration of cerebral blood flow using reperfusion therapy is the most effective maneuver for salvaging penumbra. We re-evaluated the previously described PROTECT (PRoximal balloon Occlusion TogEther with direCt Thrombus aspiration during stent retriever thrombectomy) Plus technique at a tertiary comprehensive stroke center. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with stentrievers between May 2011 and April 2020. Patients were divided between those who underwent PROTECT Plus and those who did not (proximal balloon occlusion with stent retriever only). We compared the groups in terms of reperfusion, groin to reperfusion time, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge. Within the study period, 167 (71.4%) PROTECT Plus and 67 (28.6%) non-PROTECT patients which met our inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients with successful reperfusion (mTICI >2b) between the techniques (85.0% vs 82.1%; p = 0.58). The PROTECT Plus group had lower rates of mRS ≤2 at discharge (40.1% vs 57.6%; p = 0.016). The rate of sICH was comparable (p = 0.35) between the PROTECT Plus group (7.2%) and the non-PROTECT group (3.0%). The PROTECT Plus technique using a BGC, a distal reperfusion catheter and stent retriever is feasible for recanalization of large vessel occlusions. Successful recanalization, first-pass recanalization and complication rates are similar between PROTECT Plus and non-PROTECT stent retriever techniques. This study adds to an existing body of literature detailing techniques that use both a stent retriever and a distal reperfusion catheter to maximize recanalization for patients with large vessel occlusions.

Abstract Number ‐ 73: Successful Endovascular Treatment of Medically Refractory CVST Using a Large Bore Distal Platform Thrombo‐aspiration Catheters.

Introduction Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare (0.5‐2/100,000 incidence) but potentially fatal (5% mortality rate) neurological condition. The diagnosis may be delayed due to the non‐specific presenting symptoms such as headache, altered mental status, or seizures. Anticoagulation has long been the standard therapy for CVST. However, a subset of patients do not respond to medical therapy, and may develop complications such as ischemic stroke, hemorrhage, and cerebral edema. In the ISCVT study, 13% of patients experienced poor outcomes despite anticoagulation. Recently, it has been shown that patients with extensive clot burden, cerebral edema, elevated ICP, and altered mentation may achieve better outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) compared to anticoagulation. We present a patient with CVST who failed therapeutic anticoagulation but improved with thrombectomy using the novel Zoom 088 Aspiration system, that further demonstrating the efficacy of combination therapy with anticoagulation and EVT. Methods A case report of successful CVST treatment using large bore aspiration catheters. Results A 37‐year‐old woman with a history of migraine and current oral contraceptive use presented with acute, persistent, and severe right hemicranial and retro‐orbital headache. Non‐contrast CT head suggested thrombosis of the right transverse sinus. MR venogram confirmed CVST involving the right transverse sinus, sigmoid sinus, and internal jugular vein. We started therapeutic anticoagulation, but the patient’s headache progressively worsened. Repeat MR venogram revealed extension of the CVST. Given clinical and radiological worsening, we proceeded with EVT procedure using a Zoom 088 aspiration system, resulting in successful recanalization of the involved sinuses. However, there was persistent severe headache following the procedure. She developed a new long segment obstructive thrombus in the left transverse sinus and partial re‐occlusion of the right sigmoid sinus on repeat MR venogram. A second EVT procedure was performed using the Zoom 088 Aspiration system, with complete recanalization. Postoperatively, her symptoms resolved and at 3‐month follow‐up she remained largely asymptomatic without neurological deficits. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported successful clinical use of the Zoom 088 aspiration device for CVST. The Zoom 088 Aspiration system is a newer generation large distal platform thrombo‐aspiration catheter. Studies have established efficacy of contact aspiration and stent retriever technique for arterial thrombi. Venous sinus clots are loosely bound to the vessel wall, perhaps making them more readily removable through aspiration. However, its standard application for CVST, including its efficacy and complication rates, remain to be analyzed in larger prospective studies. Conclusions This case highlights the pivotal role of EVT, especially large‐bore catheter based aspiration approach, in the management of medically refractory CVST. Thrombo‐aspiration technology is evolving at an accelerated rate with versatile and navigable devices such as the Zoom 088 aspirator. Larger studies are warranted to establish its technical efficacy and safety profile.

Mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of primary and secondary distal medium-vessel occlusion stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThere is limited evidence on the indication and role of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with distal medium-vessel occlusions (DMVOs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to...

Parallel stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy of an acute internal carotid artery occlusion refractory to standard techniques: A case report

Although mechanical thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion is generally effective, some occlusions are refractory. We report a patient in whom the parallel stent retriever technique using two Trevo stent retrievers (Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California, USA) was required to treat an intracranial and epidural internal carotid artery occlusion after other techniques had failed. A 68-year-old woman presented with an acute left internal carotid artery occlusion 4 days after mechanical thrombectomy of a left middle cerebral artery occlusion. She was not a candidate for intravenous thrombolysis because of a recent cerebral infarction. Attempts at mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever, contact aspiration, or combined contact aspiration and stent retriever were unsuccessful. The parallel stent retriever technique using two 6 × 25-mm Trevo stent retrievers enabled coverage of the entire thrombus, and successful reperfusion was achieved (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b). After the procedure, the patient was able to walk without assistance. Her modified Rankin Scale score was 2 at 90 days follow-up. Microscopic examination of the retrieved thrombi demonstrated red blood cells, fibrin, and partial endothelialization. The parallel Trevo stent retriever technique has the potential as rescue therapy for refractory large-vessel occlusion. However, complications arising from this technique remain uncertain. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of this technique in terms of recanalization and clinical safety.

Modification by an aspiration catheter for vessel stretching in thrombectomy using a stent retriever in vitro

ObjectivesPost-thrombectomy subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is caused by vessel stretching when retrieving a stent retriever (SR), is a complication of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EVT) using an SR. This in vitro study examined the association between EVT for middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and M2 vessel stretching depending on the positioning of the SR or combined use of SR and aspiration catheter (AC) technique (CBT). Materials and methodsA silicone vascular model was used. The maximum migration distance (MMD) in the anteroposterior view of an X-ray impermeable metal marker located at an M2 trunk 20 mm distal to the M1-2 bifurcation in angiographic images during an SR retrieval was calculated. According to the positioning of SR deployment (distal or proximal) and use of an AC [SR alone without an AC (SR alone) group, stent retrieval into an AC (SA) group, and stent-AC retrieval as a unit into a guiding catheter (SA unit) group], 60 attempts were conducted with each group of 10 attempts. ResultsIn distal SR deployment, the MMD in the CBT group, consisting of SA and SA unit groups, was significantly smaller than the SR alone group (1.36 ± 0.32 mm VS 2.39 ± 1.10 mm; p = 0.001). In proximal SR deployment, the CBT group showed a tendency to decrease MMD (1.38 ± 0.33 mm VS 1.63 ± 0.28 mm; p = 0.077). ConclusionsThis in vitro study showed that CBT might help modify the stretching of M2 when an SR is distally deployed in MCA occlusion.

Double stent-retriever as the first-line approach in mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized in vitro evaluation

BackgroundA repeated number of passes during mechanical thrombectomy leads to worse clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. Initial experiences with the simultaneous double stent-retriever (double-SR) technique as the first-line treatment...

Contact aspiration and stent retriever versus stent retriever alone following mechanical thrombectomy for patients of acute ischemic stroke: A recanalization success analysis

ObjectiveSecond-generation catheters used in mechanical thrombectomy have different advantages and disadvantages. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of contact aspiration and stent retriever technique on the rate of reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion. MethodsPatients who underwent contact aspiration alone (CAA cohort, n = 150), stent retriever alone (SRA cohort, n = 129), or combined contact aspiration and stent retriever (CSR cohort, n = 122) techniques following mechanical thrombectomy were included in the analysis. A balloon guide catheter was used for all thrombectomies. Digital subtraction angiography was used to identify thrombolysis in cerebral infarction. ResultsThe number of patients with thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of ≥ 2c (near complete or complete antegrade reperfusion) was significantly higher in the CSR cohort than those in the CAA cohort (101 [83%] vs. 90 [60%], p < 0.0001) and those of SRA cohort (101 [83%] vs. 77 [59%], p = 0.0001). Arterial perforation was higher in patients in the CSR cohort than in those in the CAA (p < 0.0001) and SRA (p = 0.015) cohorts. Intracerebral hemorrhage was lower in patients in the CSR cohort than in those in the CAA (p = 0.0001) and SRA (p = 0.0353) cohorts. All-cause mortality at 1 year was fewer in the CSR cohort than in the CAA cohort (p = 0.018). ConclusionsThe combination of thrombo aspiration by large bore aspiration catheter and stent retriever is the most effective technique but has some related risks. Level of evidenceIV. Technical efficacy stage1.

Devices and Techniques.

This extensive review explores the intricacies of the three principal mechanical thrombectomy techniques: the stent retriever technique, contact aspiration technique, and a combined approach, and their application in managing acute ischemic stroke. Each technique operates uniquely on the thrombus, leading to differences in their efficacy. Factors including clot size, clot stiffness, vessel tortuosity, and the angle of interaction between the aspiration catheter and the clot significantly influence these differences. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown the overall equivalency of these techniques for the treatments of large vessel occlusion and distal medium vessel occlusions. However, there are nuanced differences that emerge under specific clinical circumstances, highlighting the absence of a one-size-fits-all strategy in acute ischemic stroke management. We emphasize the need for future investigations to elucidate these nuances further, aiming to refine procedural strategies and individualize patient care for optimal outcomes.