School Library Media Specialist training via distance education is of interest to library community which is seeking to stem shortage of school library personnel. However, effectiveness of distance education compared to face-to-face delivery has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study compares one graduate-level School Library Media Specialist program delivered both through online and face-to-face instructional delivery methods. We found that, for most part, two student cohorts (distance and face-to-face) performed equally in areas demonstrating content knowledge. However, online cohort earned fewer points than face-to-face cohort on some project activities demonstrating difficulty in relating intricacies of project work via an online course. This study suggests that delivery of School Library Media Specialist training can be conducted through an online format if attention is paid to communicating details of project based work. Challenges of Online Distance Education Beginning as correspondence courses in 1 888, distance education (DE) in library profession has evolved though stages of traveling faculty members, televised courses, and satellite communications to Internet or online courses' in an attempt to reach authences that are not well served by traditional delivery methods.2 Today, the Internet has become a regular part of education of next generation of library and information professionals.3 Over years, researchers have examined many facets of DE4 and, more specifically, importance of online DE in library and information science (LIS) programs.5 They have found several barriers to effective online DE programs including technology problems, isolation of students, limited access to library resources, pressures of personal commitments, inflexible instructors, and unclear course requirements and instructor expectations.6 Researchers have focused on four major issues: effectiveness of programs, learner perceptions, learner attributes, and delivery technologies.7 A great deal of current research on DE centers on last three issues,8 especially on student attitudes and community-building. Developing a sense of community and fostering positive student perceptions are essential elements in providing successful online educational experiences9 and a number of researchers have explored this. Combining delivery technologies with community building, Nicholson explored development of communication scaffolds through technology selection.10 The evaluation of program effectiveness, fourth issue, presents some serious problems for researchers. Although a number of studies have shown that DE courses in general are comparable or superior to face-to-face (F2F) instruction, online distance education programs are often perceived by library employers and other professionals as inferior to traditional programs.12 Contributing to this perception is fact that many of studies of DE were based on older televised or satellite delivery modes and not on Internet delivery. A comprehensive review of research on teaching courses online did not reveal much discussion of evaluation in online courses.13 The majority of research on learning outcomes in cognitive domain in online courses has used examinations (especially midterms and finals) as a basis for comparison.14 Mandinach maintains that effective evaluation of on-line DE must rely on development of new forms of assessment to measure both knowledge and skills.15 It would be difficult to create randomly assigned treatment and control groups, ensuring equivalent groups, because of diverse and unknown characteristics of online student populations.16 Thus assessment of online DE must include rubrics, and instruction must provide detailed explanations of all assignments with examples of acceptable and unacceptable work.17 As Lorenzetti points out, with online DE must come a great focus on accountability. …