Stem In Hip Arthroplasty Research Articles

The cemented stem in hip arthroplasty - state of the art technique and recommendations.

The indication for femoral stem cementation should be made on a patient-specific basis, taking physical activity, femoral geometry, and bone tissue quality into account. Age alone should not be the sole justification for cementation. The Dorr classification can serve as decision support for whether a cemented fixation should be used. Femoral neck fractures should generally be cemented. Familiarize yourself with the applied stem philosophy. Force-closed stems typically have a polished surface that allows for subsidence, especially in the first 2 years postoperatively. Stems following the shape-closed philosophy have rougher surfaces and do not allow subsidence. There are various types of cement that differ in viscosity and can be categorized accordingly. These cement types go through four temperature-dependent phases: mixing phase, waiting phase, working phase, and curing phase. Rough implants should be implanted quickly, using wetter cement. For a polished stem, the cement should be slightly firmer. To avoid complications like bone cement implantation syndrome, it is essential to adhere to the state-of-the-art retrograde cementation technique, which recommends pulsatile lavage and vacuum mixing of the cement. Additionally, cement restrictors and pressurizers are used. A thorough understanding of cementation techniques is crucial to ensure a favorable outcome with a uniformly thick cement mantle that encompasses the entire stem. Incorrect cementing can lead to the premature failure of the endoprosthesis.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Long Cementless Monobloc Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Chronic Periprosthetic Infection

BackgroundA long cementless monobloc stem is widely used for aseptic loosening, with satisfactory five-to-ten-year outcomes reported. Nonetheless, related studies on chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are scant. This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the stem in two-stage revisions due to PJI. MethodsThis prospective multicenter cohort study consisted of patients from three medical centers who were enrolled in a single arm from January 2017 to May 2022. All patients were diagnosed with chronic PJI based on International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria and underwent two-stage revisions using a long monobloc cementless revision stem. Among 44 patients, 37 (12 women and 25 men) completed an average follow-up of 35.6 months (range, 14 to 75). The primary outcome was the stability of the stem; secondary outcomes included infection eradication, Harris hip score, leg length discrepancy, major complications, and isolated pathogens at intraoperative cultures. ResultsAt one year after revision, the infection-free prosthesis survival rate was 97.3% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 96.4 to 98.2%). At the last follow-up, the mean subsidence was 2.9 ± 2.1 mm (range, 0.8 to 4.8). Postoperative leg length discrepancy averaged −4.6 ± 4.9 mm (range, −16 to 0). The Engh score averaged 14.1 ± 6.9 (range, 0 to 22). The Harris hip score improved from a preoperative average of 35.7 ± 8.5 (range, 12 to 50) to 80.4 ± 9.3 (range, 58 to 92) at the 1-year postoperative follow-up (P < 0.01). ConclusionThe long cementless monobloc stem used in the current study presents a feasible option for two-stage revision in cases of chronic PJI. The bone ingrowth and stability could be observed within the short follow-up time.

Influence of proximal femoral morphology on osteointegration of the AMIS uncemented femoral stem in modern hip arthroplasty

BackgroundIndications for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have evolved over recent decades, with a growing trend toward operating on younger and more active patients. With this shift in patient demographics, there has been a change in femoral stem designs and proximal femoral morphology encountered. This study aimed to evaluate the potential correlation between femoral stem osteointegration and proximal femoral morphology using the Dorr and Noble classifications.Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 122 uncemented femoral stems (AMIstem Medacta, triple tapered). The demographic data analyzed included sex, age, stem size, and surgical indications. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed to determine the Dorr classification as well as the canal-to-calcar isthmus ratio, cortical index, and canal flare index. Postoperative radiographs were carefully reviewed to identify the presence of potential postoperative radiolucencies. Inter- and intra-observer agreements for these parameters were also analyzed.ResultsSignificant radiolucencies (> 2 mm) were found in 19.5% of the patients. Of all the variables analyzed, the cortical index was the only parameter significantly associated with the appearance of clinically significant radiolucency, with a threshold value of 0.62.ConclusionsThe appearance of radiolucencies is multi-factorial. Nevertheless, in this study, a high cortical index (> 0.62), representing the champagne flute morphology, was found to be associated with the development of significant radiolucencies.

Efficacy of Hydroxyapatite Cementless Femoral Stem in Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients

Abstract Background Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) significantly improves the lives of patients with hip issues, achieving a 78% survival rate after 35 years. Challenges such as distal stem migration impact longevity, but innovations like tapered femoral stems and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings enhance stability and osteointegration, thus promoting implant durability and avoiding the need for bone cement. Continuous advancements in surgical methods and materials promise even better future outcomes for THA patients. Objective To assess the efficacy of different hydroxyapatite stem designs in different Dorr index and to decrease complications of bone cement implantation syndrome in elderly patients. To assess the subsidence of cementless femoral stem in 65 years old and above patients. To measure the functional outcomes, complications, morbidity, and mortality after cementless femoral stem in 65 years old and above patients. Patients and Methods This was a prospective, interventional study. 34 patients were included in the study between 2022-2024. All patients were 65 years old and above, and all of them were planned to undergo HA-coated cementless femoral surgery after preoperative assessment of the Dorr index. Subsidence and functional outcomes (HHS, HOOS) were assessed at three time points (6 months, 1year and 2 years). In addition, subgroup analysis was performed to assess anti-osteoporotic agents and smoking, and their correlation with subsidence and functional outcomes. Results This study included 34 patients with a female-to-male ratio of 20:14 who underwent different primary hip arthroplasties. Our study employed a per-protocol approach for postoperative functional analysis, necessitating the exclusion of two patients (5.88%) due to inadequate filling fixation of the cementless stem, and we had to use a cemented stem. One patient (2.9%) had a dislocation three weeks post-surgery, which required revision due to stem instability, and another patient was excluded due to a periprosthetic infection (2.9%), necessitating implant removal in the 2nd session of debridement four weeks after surgery. Thirty patients were subjected to the final analysis using a per-protocol approach, and the mean subsidence was quantified at three time points (6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). The data demonstrated a temporal increase in mean subsidence, which peaked at 1.92 ± 0.34 mm at the conclusion of the 2-year period. The mean of Subsidence 1.92 ± 0.34 mm were statistically non-significant to the functional outcomes which showing statistically significant of the HA coating cementless femoral stem by time P-value of 0.001. Subgroup analysis of the anti-osteoporotic agents had a statistically significant effect on lowering the subsidence (P &amp;lt; 0.001) but did not affect the functional outcomes. Smoking showed a statistically significant decrease in subsidence (P = 0.007) compared with the non-smoking group. Conclusion The employment of cementless hydroxyapatite femoral stems in geriatric patients aged 65 years and above, presenting with hip pathologies such as osteoarthritis or fractures, constitutes a viable surgical strategy. This approach mitigates the risk associated with cement usage, while ensuring favorable functional outcomes with early unrestricted weight bearing and a low rate of complications. Additionally, our results indicate a reduction in stem subsidence among patients receiving anti-osteoporotic treatments and those who do not smoke when a hydroxyapatite cementless femoral stem is used; however, these variations did not demonstrate a correlation with functional outcomes. Consequently, we advocate for additional research to elucidate the influence of anti-osteoporotic treatment on femoral stem osteointegration in such a high-risk cohort.

Seating of the Femoral Stem after Washing versus Un-washing the Femoral Canal in Cementless Short Stem Hip Arthroplasty

Seating of the Femoral Stem after Washing versus Un-washing the Femoral Canal in Cementless Short Stem Hip Arthroplasty

Mid- to long-term periprosthetic bone density changes after cementless short stem hip arthroplasty in elderly: A clinical and radiological analysis

IntroductionShort stem prostheses were originally designed for younger and more active patients. In recent years, they have been increasingly offered to older patients. This study evaluates the mid-to long-term survival of a short stem prosthesis and the changes in periprosthetic bone density following implantation of a cementless short hip stem in patients over 60 years of age. Methods118 patients aged over 60 received short stem prostheses. Clinical examination included Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). 93 patients were followed clinically for at least five years. 53 patients underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and radiographic evaluation. Follow-up intervals were preoperative and postoperative (t0), at approximately six months (t1), at approximately two years (t2), and at approximately five years or later (t3). ResultsOver a mean 6.7-year observation period for all 118 patients, one stem revision occurred due to a traumatic periprosthetic stem fracture. The five-year survival rate for the endpoint survival of the Metha® stem in 95 at-risk patients is 99.2%. HHS improved significantly from t0 55.3 ± 11.5 (range 30–79) to t3 95.3 ± 8.6 (range 57–100) at a mean of 8.0 years (p < 0.001). HOOS improved significantly in each subscale (p < 0.001). Bone mineral density (BMD) was available for review in 53 patients after a mean of 7.1 years. BMD increased from t0 to t3 in region of interest (ROI) 3 (+0.4%) and ROI 6 (+2.9%) and decreased in ROI 1 (−10.3%), ROI 2 (−9.8%), ROI 4 (−5.3%), ROI 5 (−3.4%) and ROI 7 (−23.1%). ConclusionsThe evaluated short stem prosthesis shows a remarkably high survival rate in elderly patients, accompanied by excellent clinical results. Load transfer measurements show a metaphyseal-diaphyseal pattern with a trend towards increased diaphyseal transfer over the period observed.

15-year survivorship of a unique dual-modular femoral stem in primary hip arthroplasty

BackgroundHip offset, version, and length are interdependent femoral variables which determine stability and leg length. Balancing these competing variables remains a core challenge in hip arthroplasty. The potential benefits of modular femoral stems have been overshadowed by higher rates of failure. The objective of this study was to assess the survivorship of a unique dual-modular femoral stem at an average 15-year follow-up period.MethodsThe records of all patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with this device between 2004–2009 were reviewed. There were no exclusions for BMI or other factors. We examined the data with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The primary endpoint for survival was mechanical failure of the modular neck-body junction.ResultsThe survivorship of this device in 172 subjects was 100% with none experiencing mechanical failure of the modular junction at an average of 15 years. 60 patients died of causes unrelated to their THA and 9 patients were lost to follow-up. There were three early (≤ 12 months) dislocations (1.7%), and seven total dislocations (4.1%). 16 patients underwent reoperations during the follow-up period, none for any complication of the modular junction. Radiographic results showed well-fixed femoral stems in all cases. There were no leg length discrepancies of greater than 10 mm, and 85% were within 5 mm.ConclusionThere were no mechanical failures of the modular junction in any of the subjects over the average 15-year period, demonstrating that this dual-modular design is not associated with increased failure rates. We achieved a 1.7% early dislocation rate and a 4.1% total dislocation rate without any clinically significant leg length discrepancies.

Do all short stem types restore biomechanical parameters of the hip? Comparison according to femoral neck osteotomy levels.

There is no consensus on ideal short femoral stem design. A classification system proposed by Feyen and Shimmin divides short stems in two types according to femoral neck osteotomy levels: subcapital (IIIA) and standard (IIIB). The study aims to determine which design type is more successful in restoring native biomechanical parameters and whether stem type has an impact on clinical results. In this retrospective comparative study, patients that have undergone short stem hip arthroplasty were evaluated according to stem types: type IIIA (n = 52, 66.7%) (Mathys Optimys) and IIIB (n = 26, 33.3%) (Implantcast Aida and Smith & Nephew SMF). Pelvis X-rays were assessed in terms of femoral neck length, horizontal and vertical hip centres of rotation, horizontal and vertical femoral offsets, abductor lever arm lengths, leg lengths, and stem-shaft angles. Improvement in Harris hip scores, differences between post-operative and pre-operative measurements, and stem-shaft angles were evaluated and compared between two groups. Mean femoral neck resection (8.27 ± 6.68mm in IIIA and 15 ± 6.33mm in IIIB) was significantly different between both groups (p < 0.001). Harris hip scores were increased at post-operative six months in both groups with no difference (84.4 ± 6.4 and 84.6 ± 5.5, p = 0.4). The absolute values of differences between pre-operative and post-operative horizontal centres of rotation (p = 0.63), vertical centers of rotation (p = 0.75), horizontal femoral offsets (p = 0.78), vertical femoral offsets (p = 0.83), abductor lever arm distances (p = 0.63), and leg length (p = 0.21) measurements were not different between both groups. Stem positions were both varus with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.14). We found no difference regarding restoration of biomechanical parameters between short stem designs with different levels of neck osteotomy. Additionally, short stem can mostly result in varus component positioning regardless of the level of neck osteotomy.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of long monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated stem in revision hip arthroplasty with extended trochanteric osteotomy: a multicenter study

BackgroundThe distally fixed stem used in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) with extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is subject to periprosthetic fracture, stem subsidence, and stress shielding. The prospective multicentric study aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications of using the Corail revision stem in rTHA with ETO.MethodsSixty-four patients undergoing rTHA with ETO using the Corail revision stem between 2019 and 2020 were enrolled in the study. We performed a postoperative follow-up of the patient and obtained radiographs and Harris hip scores (HHSs). These results were used to analyze ETO union, Engh scores, bone remodeling, stem stability and hip function.ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 34 months (range 23–41). Sixty-two patients who underwent ETOs achieved complete healing at the final follow-up. Fifty-nine hips had bony ingrowth from the osteotomy fragment to the stem without radiolucent lines. The postoperative Engh score was 21.3 ± 3.59 (range 15.5–27.0). Forty-three hips had regeneration in the proximal femur. Two patients had transient thigh pain postoperatively. The postoperative HHS improved from 40.7 ± 16.67 (range 0–67) preoperatively to 82.1 ± 6.83 (range 73–93).ConclusionCorail revision stems are a viable and reliable option in rTHA with ETO. This stem had excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes, resulting in a high rate of ETO union and stem survival. The revision stem enabled restoration of proximal bone stock in femurs with prerevision bone defects, which were prepared for the next revision operation.Level of evidence Level IIb, Prospective self-control study.

Last generation fluted modular titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty: a narrative review of mid- and long-term outcomes.

Tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), were introduced to overcome proximal femur bone defects. They obtain stable fixation even in catastrophic proximal bone loss. Modular ones have the advantage to adjust length, rotation, off-set independently from the distal module. Short-term publications have been showing favorable outcomes burdened by an unacceptably high rate of stem failure. Still, there is a paucity of mid- and long-term reports. This narrative review aims at analyzing recent literature on modular TFTS with at least 5 years of minimum follow-up to gain a better understanding of implant survival, performance, and complications. A search of the PubMed database was performed with selected key terms. Results were screened after the application of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data were subsequently evaluated to obtain an up-to-date overview of the results and complications of TFTS. Modular TFTS showed a consistent increase in patient reported outcomes that persists at 10 years and above. Femoral fractures were the most common intraoperative complication. Despite modularity, dislocation still occurs at a variable rate (1.2-12%). With revision for any cause as an endpoint, overall survival approaches 83% after 10 years of follow-up. If femoral revision only is evaluated, excellent survival rates (>95%) have been published. Stem subsidence over 5 mm was reported in less than 5% of patients, only 1 requiring femoral revision. The mean incidence of stem mechanical failure was 3.39%, although most breakages occurred in stems eventually retired from the market. Satisfactory survival rates were observed, with an acceptable rate of complications. Stem mechanical failure, excluding those stems eventually retired from the market, remains a marginal event. Therefore, the use of modular TFTS in revision surgery is safe and effective even in the long term.

Short stem hip arthroplasty with the optimys prosthesis is a safe and effective option for obese patients: a mid-term follow-up multicenter study

IntroductionShort stems are a valuable option in young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of their bone stock preserving properties facilitating revision hip arthroplasty. Although the effect of obesity on conventional THA is well studied, data about short stem THA in obese patients are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of obesity on complications, revisions, and outcome after short stem THA.Materials and methodsThis multicenter, observational cohort study included patients undergoing short stem THA with the optimys prosthesis. Follow-up examinations were performed at specific intervals up to 7 years postoperatively. Operation characteristics, general and specific complications, revisions, VAS rest pain, VAS load pain, VAS patient satisfaction, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were recorded and statistically compared between obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) patients.ResultsOf the 224 patients included with a mean follow-up of 87.2 months (range 81.9–104.0), 69 were assigned to the OB group and 155 to the non-OB group. A minimally invasive approach was significantly less often selected in obese patients (p = 0.049), whereas operating time and length of hospital stay were not significantly different. The rate of general and specific complications did not significantly differ between both groups. Survival of the optimys prosthesis was 99.1% at 7-year follow-up and one patient per group had to undergo revision surgery. VAS rest pain, load pain, and satisfaction improved from preoperatively to postoperatively in both groups without a significant difference between both groups. While the HHS was improved from preoperatively to postoperatively, obese patients showed a significantly lower HHS at the 7-year follow-up (p = 0.01) but still exhibited an excellent scoring above the PASS threshold.ConclusionShort stem THA with the optimys prosthesis is a safe and effective option also in obese patients with an excellent clinical outcome and a low complication rate.

Lower Rates of Femoral Fracture and Subsidence with a Morphometric Stem in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

A "morphometric" tapered femoral stem with size-specific medial curvatures and proportional neck lengths was introduced, attempting to improve fixation and biomechanics in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) across a range of femoral sizes and morphotypes. We investigated whether this design reduced complications and better restored anatomy (e.g., limb length and offset) compared to a traditional tapered stem with consistent neck lengths across sizes. We reviewed 389 THAs (340 patients) performed using either of two cementless femoral implants. Records were reviewed for demographics, surgical details, complications, and reoperations. Radiographs were examined for subsidence, biologic fixation, leg lengths, offset, and proximal femoral morphology. The intraoperative fracture rate was lower with this morphometric stem compared to this traditional stem (0 vs. 3.4%), as was the incidence of postoperative subsidence ≥3mm (4.7 vs. 19.2%). With the numbers available, no differences were identified regarding rates of reoperation for periprosthetic femur fracture (0 vs. 1.0%) and femoral fixation failure without fracture (1.1 vs. 0%), or all-cause reoperations (2.7 vs. 2.4%). Limb length and offset restoration were similar with the two implants, but the shortest available femoral head was used less frequently with this morphometric stem compared to this traditional stem (22 vs. 54%). This morphometric stem was associated with decreased rates of intraoperative fracture and postoperative subsidence, along with decreased use of the shortest available head. Nevertheless, both implants demonstrated clinical success, allowing reconstruction of limb length and offset with low rates of femoral fixation failure.

United States Experience With a Femoral Neck Retaining Total Hip Arthroplasty Stem: A Retrospective Study With Control Comparison From the Literature

BackgroundFemoral neck retaining prostheses have gained popularity in Europe, but the United States has not seen the same trends occurring. Previous reports demonstrate high survivorship for these implants, but to our knowledge, there are no reports examining US data. MethodsAfter institutional review board approval, 824 primary total hip arthroplasties utilizing a femoral neck-retaining prosthesis were examined for femoral component survivorship rates. European studies were systematically reviewed to determine survivorship rates. The data were used to formulate a Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve and compare US data to that of the European studies. ResultsEuropean studies demonstrated survivorship rates for all causes of 97.7 and 99.0% for aseptic loosening at an average of 6 years (range, 4.5 to 10). The current study demonstrated an all-cause 94% Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate at 5 years and when aseptic loosening only was considered, survivorship increased to 99.4% at 5 years and 98.4% at 11 years. ConclusionThis femoral neck-retaining prosthesis demonstrated excellent survivorship that is comparable to the rates seen in European studies as well as the rates of standard and mid-stem prostheses in the United States.

Is Posterior Femoral Neck Cortex an Obstacle in Achieving Sagittal Plane Balance of Uncemented Straight Femoral Stem?

There is a paucity of the literature that aims to improve sagittal plane balance of femoral stem in hip arthroplasty. We have comparatively evaluated the effect of trimming the posterior cortex left in situ after femoral neck osteotomy and counter-clockwise rotation of starting awl with respect to their ability to achieve neutral alignment of femoral stem in sagittal plane. (1) Which of the two techniques under reference is more reliable in achieving a sagittal plane balance of the femoral stem in the femoral canal? (2) Does either of the two techniques have the potential to adversely affect other parameters for the optimum placement of femoral stem? This prospective study involved a total of 60 patients (age group of 18 to 60years) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a standard posterolateral approach. They were randomized into groups (1) PNCT (n = 30): femoral canal preparation was done by posterior neck cortex trimming method; (2) CCRA (n = 30): femoral canal preparation was done by counter-clockwise rotation of starting awl. Postoperatively, radiographs and computed tomography were obtained and angle of femoral stem with the femoral canal in coronal and sagittal plane, femoral stem tip deviation in coronal and sagittal plane, anteversion of the femoral stem, duration of canal preparation and blood loss were analyzed between the two groups. Based on our results, there is a significantly better sagittal alignment of the femoral stem within the femoral canal, both in terms of angle of the femoral stem with the femoral canal (p < 0.001) and the deviation of the femoral stem tip from the center of the medullary canal (p < 0.001) when the posterior neck cortex was trimmed. Canal preparation by trimming the posterior neck cortex took a mean of 11.93min (range 8-15min) against the mean duration of 6.87min (range; 5min to 9min) in the other group (p < 0.001). Trimming the posterior femoral neck cortex after neck osteotomy results in better sagittal plane balance of uncemented straight femoral stem. III.

The history of the development of the regular straight stem in hip arthroplasty.

Since the middle of the 20th century, total hip arthroplasty has become a very successful treatment for all end-stage diseases of the hip joint. Charnley solved with his low frictional torque arthroplasty the problem of wear and friction with the introduction of a new bearing couple and the reduction of the head size, which set the prerequisite for the further development of stem design. This narrative review presents the major developments of regular straight stems in hip arthroplasty. It does not only provide an overview of the history but also assembles the generally scarce documentation available regarding the rationale of developments and illustrates often-unsuspected links. Charnley's success is based on successfully solving the issue of fixation of the prosthetic components to the bone, using bone cement made of polymethyl-methacrylate. In the field of cemented anchorage of the stem, two principles showing good long-term revision rates emerged over the years: the force-closed and the shape-closed principles. The non-cemented anchorage bases on prosthesis models ensure enough primary stability for osteointegration of the implant to occur. For bone to grow onto the surface, not only sufficient primary stability is required but also a suitable surface structure together with a biocompatible prosthetic material is also necessary.

Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted, tapered, modular stem follow-up method for a mean of three years: A preliminary study.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the results and complications related to revision total hip arthroplasty within a short-to-medium follow up period. Methods: From January 2016 to January 2020, we reviewed 31 prosthetic hip arthroplasty stem revisions using a fluted, tapered modular stem with distal fixation. The median age of the patients was 74.55-79years. The survival rate was 100%, and there were no re-revisions. The Harris hip score improved from an average of 36.5 ± 7.8 before surgery to 81.8 ± 6.2 at the final follow-up. Results: The average final follow-up was 36 (24-60)months. During this time, there was no periprosthetic infection, no prosthesis loosening or breakage, and no sciatic nerve injury. Complications included four (12.9%) intraoperative fractures and eight (25.8%) dislocations that had no stem fractures. The postoperative limb was lengthened by 17.8 ± 9.8mm. In most cases, bone regeneration was an early and important finding. Three cases underwent extended trochanteric osteotomy, and bone healing was achieved by the final follow-up. Conclusion: The modular tapered stem reviewed in this study was very versatile, could be used in most femoral revision cases, and allowed for rapid bone reconstruction. However, a long-term follow-up study is needed to confirm these results.

Is a Total Hip Arthroplasty Stem in Varus a Risk Factor of Long-Term Mechanical Complication?

BackgroundThe impact of implanting cementless femoral stems in varus alignment on long-term mechanical complications remains poorly defined in the literature. The aim of our study was to compare survivorship and functional and radiographic outcomes of stems in varus alignment to those in neutral alignment with and average follow-up of 10 years. MethodsThis single-center, multisurgeon, retrospective case-control study compared a group of 105 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients who had varus stem alignment (Varus Stem) to a matching group of 105 THA patients who had neutral stem alignment, operated on between January 2007 and December 2012. The primary outcome measure was implant survival. Secondary outcomes included functional (Harris Hip Score, Postel Merle d'Aubigné Score, thigh pain, dislocation and hip range of motion) and radiographic outcomes (radiolucency, osseointegration, heterotopic ossification, subsidence, and stress shielding). ResultsThere was no significant difference in implant survival between the 2 groups with 95.7% (±2.46) in the Varus Stem group versus 97.7% (±1.64) in the Neutral Stem group (P = .41) after an average follow-up of 10 years. There was no significant difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes between groups. ConclusionCementless femoral stems in varus alignment were not the cause of mechanical complications with an average follow-up of 10 years. The comparison between groups in terms of implant survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes does not show any significant differences. Positioning a femoral stem in varus alignment may be an alternative for surgeons wishing to restore preoperative offset and to ensure satisfactory hip stability.

The short-term outcomes of cementless stem for hip arthroplasty in the elderly patients: comparison with patients < 65 years

ObjectiveThe use of cement or cementless femoral stem prosthesis for hip arthroplasty in elderly patients has been controversial. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of cementless femoral stem in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years).MethodsThe short-term efficacy of primary hip arthroplasty with cementless femoral stem in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: young group (< 65 years) and the elder group (≥ 65 years). The evaluation index was the Harris Hip score (Harris), postoperative femoral stem prosthesis sinking distance and femoral plant-related complications (periprosthetic fracture, prosthesis loosening, infection, dislocation, etc.).ResultsThere were 72 cases of 86 hips in the young group and 83 cases of 92 hips in the elder group. The recovery trend of functional score in the elder group was similar to that in the young group, and the Harris score increased from (38.35 ± 18.21) before surgery to (86.91 ± 12.55) at last follow-up (p < 0.01). Compared with the two groups at the same time of 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, the sinking distance of the elder group was significantly greater (P < 0.05). Even in the elder group, there was a significant difference in sinking distance between 6 and 3 months after surgery (2.44 ± 0.49 mm vs 2.10 ± 0.65 mm, P = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between 12 and 6 months (2.53 ± 0.53 mm vs 2.44 ± 0.49 mm, P = 0.40). A total of 10 patients in the elder group and 6 patients in the young group had a complication event (P = 0.36).ConclusionsElderly patients with cementless femoral stems can achieve metal-bone integration slightly longer than young patients, but short-term clinical outcomes can be restored to a satisfactory level with adequate safety. However, the long-term efficacy still needs to be verified by multicenter, large sample size and prospective clinical follow-up results.

Cementless primary or revision stem in revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect?

The use of primary or revision stem during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent revision THA with a primary or revision stem. We retrospectively reviewed 78 patients who received revision THA for aseptic stem loosening using primary (N = 28) or revision stems (N = 50). The bone defects were classified as Paprosky type I or II. The mean follow-up duration was 72.3 ± 34.7 months. The primary outcome domains included surgical complications and implant failures. The secondary outcome domains included medical complications, 30- and 90-day readmission, and Harris hip score (HHS). The use of revision stem was associated with a higher incidence than primary stem of patient complications (60.0% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.018), including intraoperative femur fracture (28.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.029) and greater trochanter fracture (16.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.045). The implant survival rate was comparable between groups. HHS at the final follow-up was similar. With a lower risk of surgical complications and a similar rate of mid-term implant survival, cementless primary stem appears superior to revision stem in revision THA for aseptic stem loosening with Paprosky type I/II femoral defect.

Is there a role for cementless primary stem in hip arthroplasty for early or late fixation failures of intertrochanteric fractures?

BackgroundThe choice of femur stems during the hip arthroplasty procedures for patients with treatment failure of intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) remains controversial. We aimed to compare the surgical complication and reoperation rates between cementless primary and revision stems in the early (≤3 months) and late (> 3 months) fixation failures of ITF.MethodsThis was a retrospective, cohort study conducted in a single, tertiary referral hospital of Taipei, Taiwan. We included hip arthroplasty procedures for failed ITF using cementless primary or revision stems. There were 40 and 35 patients who had early and late fixation failure of ITF, respectively. The patient demographics, time to fixation failure, surgical complications and medical complications were recorded for analysis.ResultsWe included 75 patients that underwent hip arthroplasty procedure for failed ITF using cementless primary (n = 38) or revision (n = 37) stems. The mean age was 79.3 years and 56% of the patients were female. In the early fixation failure group, the complication rate was similar between the primary and revision stems (44% vs. 29%, p = 0.343). However, there was a trend toward a higher reoperation rate (31% vs. 8%, p = 0.061) of using the primary stem, compared with the revision stem. In the late fixation failure group, the rate of complication and reoperation was similar between the two stem types.ConclusionFor early fixation failures of ITFs, we caution against the use of cementless primary stems due to a trend towards an increased risk of reoperations compared to the use of cementless revision stems. However, in late fixation failures of ITFs, there is a role for cementless primary stems.Level of evidenceIII, retrospective cohort study.