Abstract Background/Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has led to a paradigm shift in treating aortic stenosis (AS) across patients of all surgical-risk categories. To guide the clinical decision, the ACC/AHA guidelines recommended an age group classification; with SAVR being recommended in patients < 65 years, and TAVI being favored over SAVR in patients > 80 years. In patients between 65-80 years, both modalities are to be considered after shared decision making. The impact of those guidelines-derived age group classification on the contemporary AVR practice remains of interest and is dynamically changing. Purpose This study aims to examine the temporal trends in the modality of AVR (TAVI vs SAVR) in the U.S. among different age groups using a contemporary nationwide database. Methods We conducted a retrospective study using de-identified data from the Vizient Clinical Database, which gathers patient and hospital data from more than 1000 medical Centre. We analysed TAVI and SAVR procedures from October 1, 2015, to November 30, 2023, excluding patients under 18. We examined the national trends of TAVI vs SAVR in 3 age groups (<65, 65-80, >80 years) with AS. Trend analysis was performed using linear regression. This study was deemed exempt from the requirements of 45 CFR 46.104(d) by The Miriam Hospital Institutional Review Board given that it involved de-identified data. Results During the study period, 467,832 underwent AVR (TAVI n= 252,834, SAVR n= 214,998). The patient and hospital characteristics by age group are summarized in the Table. We observed a significant rise in TAVI adoption from 33.5% in 2015 to 59.96% in 2023. However, the pattern of temporal trends varied among different age groups. In patients > 80 years, TAVI showed a steep rise from 69.95% in 2015 to 92.96% in 2023 (p<0.002). The 65-80 years age cohort demonstrated the most pronounced growth in TAVI, rising from 26.23% in 2015 to about 60% in 2020 (p.001), after which a plateau in percentage was observed. TAVI in patients <65 years has also been increasingly adopted, rising from 7.18% in 2015 to 19.12% in 2020 (p<0.002), however, followed with a slight downtrend to 16.36% in 2023 (Figure). Conclusion In this most contemporary analysis from the U.S., we demonstrate an increase in the adoption of TAVI across all age groups over the study period, with the steepest rise observed in patients between 65-80 years of age. Since the 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines, there has been a gradual downtrend in the utilisation of TAVI in patients <65 years of age indicating a possible change in practice based on scientific societal recommendations. The stabilization in TAVI percentage in the age groups 65-80 years and > 80 years in the last few years may hint towards approaching equilibrium between TAVI and SAVR for these age groups.Proportions of AVR across age groups