Steady-state Accommodative Response Research Articles

Ocular accommodation and wavelength: The effect of longitudinal chromatic aberration on the stimulus-response curve.

The longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) of the eye creates a chromatic blur on the retina that is an important cue for accommodation. Although this mechanism can work optimally in broadband illuminants such as daylight, it is not clear how the system responds to the narrowband illuminants used by many modern displays. Here, we measured pupil and accommodative responses as well as visual acuity under narrowband light-emitting diode (LED) illuminants of different peak wavelengths. Observers were able to accommodate under narrowband light and compensate for the LCA of the eye, with no difference in the variability of the steady-state accommodation response between narrowband and broadband illuminants. Intriguingly, our subjects compensated more fully for LCA at nearer distances. That is, the difference in accommodation to different wavelengths became larger when the object was placed nearer the observer, causing the slope of the accommodation response curve to become shallower for shorter wavelengths and steeper for longer ones. Within the accommodative range of observers, accommodative errors were small and visual acuity normal. When comparing between illuminants, when accommodation was accurate, visual acuity was worst for blue narrowband light. This cannot be due to the sparser spacing for S-cones, as our stimuli had equal luminance and thus activated LM-cones roughly equally. It is likely because ocular LCA changes more rapidly at shorter wavelength and so the finite spectral bandwidth of LEDs corresponds to a greater dioptric range at shorter wavelengths. This effect disappears for larger accommodative errors, due to the increased depth of focus of the eye.

Changes in accommodation and behavioural performance with a contact lens for myopia management: A comparison between a dual-focus and a single-vision soft contact lens.

IntroductionDual‐focus soft contact lenses for myopia management have demonstrated to be an effective strategy to reduce myopia progression. However, this optical design has been shown to alter visual quality and accommodative function. The aim of this study was to examine the accommodative and behavioural performance during the execution of a psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) while wearing dual‐focus and single‐vision soft contact lenses.MethodsThe steady‐state accommodative response was recorded with the WAM‐5500 binocular open‐field autorefractor during the execution of a 10‐min PVT at 50 cm either with the dual‐focus (MiSight 1‐day) or single‐vision (Proclear 1‐day) soft contact lenses, using a sample of 23 healthy young adults. Each experimental session was performed on two different days in a counterbalanced order.ResultsA greater lag of accommodation, variability of accommodation and reaction time was found while wearing dual‐focus in comparison with single‐vision soft contact lenses (mean differences during the 10‐min PVT were 0.58 ± 0.81 D, p < 0.001; 0.31 ± 0.17 D, p < 0.001 and 15.22 ± 20.93 ms, p = 0.002, respectively). Also, a time‐on‐task effect was found for the variability of accommodation and reaction time (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), observing higher values over time. However, the lag of accommodation did not change significantly as a function of time‐on‐task (p = 0.33).ConclusionDual‐focus soft contact lens wear influences the steady‐state accommodative response and behavioural performance during the execution of a visual vigilance task in the short‐term. Eye care practitioners should be aware of these effects when prescribing these lenses for myopia management, and provide specific recommendations according to the individual visual needs.

Impact of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on near work-induced transient myopia

ABSTRACTClinical relevanceDual-focus soft contact lenses are effective in slowing myopia progression; however, their influence on near work-induced transient myopia (NITM) remains unknown. When performing a 5-min near task at 20 cm, we observed that dual-focus soft contact lens wear induced greater lags of accommodation and a lower initial NITM than single-vision soft contact lenses, which provides relevant information for better understanding the impact of using this optical design on the accommodative function.BackgroundNITM has been proposed as a myogenic factor, although it is a matter of debate by the scientific community. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term effect of wearing dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control on the steady-state accommodative response and NITM.MethodsTwenty-four young myope adults wore, on two different days, dual-focus and single-vision soft contact lenses, while the accommodative response was dynamically measured with an open-field autorefractor during the execution of the NITM task. The shift and the time required to recover baseline levels in the refractive state after performing the 5-min near task (20 cm) were the main dependent variables.ResultsWe found a lower magnitude of accommodation during the execution of the near task with the dual-focus in comparison to the single-vision soft contact lenses (p < 0.001). There was a lower initial NITM with the dual-focus when compared to the single-vision lenses (corrected p-value = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.68), but no statistically significant differences were observed for decay duration (p = 0.984).ConclusionsDual-focus soft contact lens wear causes a reduced accommodative response during a near task, and an initial small myopic shift at distance after a 5-min period of near viewing. The current findings may help to understand the mechanisms involved in myopia control with this optical strategy.

Less is more: optimal recording time for measuring the steady-state accommodative response

ABSTRACT Clinical Relevance Background: Steady-state accommodation is frequently evaluated with open-field autorefractors; however there is no consensus regarding the optimal test duration. Our results allow us to standardise the procedure followed for the assessment of the steady-state accommodative response in clinical and laboratory settings and may be of great relevance in time-constrained situations. Background: The present study aims to determine the optimal recording time to assess the magnitude and variability of the accommodative response with a binocular open-field autorefractor. Methods: The steady-state accommodative response of 84 healthy undergraduate students was dynamically measured using the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 autorefractor at 500 cm, 40 cm and 20 cm for 90 s while participants maintained focus on a stationary target. We examined the reliability and level of agreement between four time intervals (the first 10-s, 30-s, 60-s and 90-s) at three accommodative demands (0.2D, 2.5D and 5D). Results: The magnitude of accommodation showed an excellent level of reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]> 0.90) for the comparisons between the 90-s, 60-s and 30-s time intervals at the three viewing distances tested. However, when including the 10-s interval, there was a moderate reduction of the reliability indices and an increase of the mean difference between two time intervals (intra-class correlation [ICC] ranging from 0.89 to 0.97; and ESs ranging from 0.16 to 0.42). For the variability of accommodation, we observed an excellent reliability for the comparisons of the 90-s and 60-s measures at the three accommodative demands (ICC: 0.95–0.96), whereas for the rest of comparisons we observed from moderate to good levels of reliability. Conclusion: Our data indicate that of 30-s and 60-s are enough to accurately assess the magnitude and variability of the accommodative response with the WAM-5500 autorefractor, respectively.

Spasm of Near Reflex: Objective Assessment of the Near-Triad.

PurposeTo characterize binocular steady-state accommodation, pupil and convergence responses (near triad) in spasm of near reflex (SNR) before and after optical and pharmacological intervention. To identify the putative source of SNR in the neural control schema of accommodation-vergence interaction using controls-engineering modeling.MethodsNear-triad of 15 patients with SNR (9 to 23 years) was recorded using an infrared photorefractor at 2m viewing distance for 120s during clinical presentation, after optical fogging intended to relieve spasm, with cycloplegia, post-cycloplegia and long-term follow-up visits. Data were also collected without cycloplegia in 15 age-matched controls. Schor (1999) model was used to computationally simulate accommodation and vergence responses of controls and SNR.ResultsBoth eyes of SNR exhibited significant myopia and refraction fluctuations (<1.0Hz) during clinical presentation [median (25th to 75th IQR) refraction: −1.7D (−3.2 to −0.8D); root mean squared (RMS) deviation: 1.1D (0.5 to 1.5D)], relative to controls [0.8D (−0.03 to 1.4D); 0.2D (0.1 to 0.3D)] (p < 0.001). These decreased after optical fogging, largely eliminated with cycloplegia and partially re-appeared in the post-cycloplegia and follow-up visits. SNR responses could be modeled by increasing the gain and decay time of tonic accommodation, vis-à-vis, controls. Pupil and convergence responses in SNR were similar to controls at all visits (p > 0.1).ConclusionsExaggerated fluctuations of steady-state accommodation may be a signature feature of SNR, even while their pupil and convergence responses may remain unaffected. These fluctuations may arise from the tonic accommodation controller, the properties of which could be potentially altered after optical fogging to relieve the disorder.

Accommodative Responses Under Different Stimulus Conditions

The method and the sequence of accommodative stimuli are two factors affecting the steady-state accommodative response. This study investigated the possible effects of these two factors on the accommodative stimulus response curves (ASRCs) and compared three indexes to evaluate ASRC in the different stimulus conditions. In this study, we investigated the difference in the accommodative stimulus response curves under six stimulus conditions. The ASRCs of 10 emmetropes were measured when the accommodative stimulus (AS) was induced using three methods: negative lenses, positive lenses, and a Badal stimulator; and the stimulus was presented using two sequences: ascending and descending sequences. Three indexes, accommodative error area (AEA), accommodative error index (AEI), and the slope of ASRC, were used for comparison. The accommodative error was larger when accommodative stimulus was presented in the ascending sequence than in the descending sequence (p < 0.05) in the Badal stimulator method whenever AEI, AEA, or the slope of ASRC was used. The ASRCs elicited with positive lenses were more accurate than that elicited with negative lenses or the Badal stimulator when AEA and AEI were used. However, when the slope of the ASRC was used, the result was not significant. The results suggest that the accommodative response in the steady state may be affected by the method used for inducing AS and the sequence of AS presented. The AEA is suggested to be used in the evaluation of the accuracy of the ASRC in future studies.

Accommodative response to peripheral stimuli in myopes and emmetropes

It has been suggested that peripheral refractive error may influence eye growth and the development of axial refractive error, implying that the peripheral retina is sensitive to defocus. This study aimed to evaluate the steady-state accommodative response to peripheral stimuli in 10 young, adult myopes (mean spherical equivalent error -2.10 ± 1.72 D, median -1.63 D, range -0.83 to -6.00 D) and 10 emmetropes (mean spherical equivalent error -0.02 ± 0.35 D, median +0.08 D, range -0.50 to +0.50 D). The subjects were asked to view monocularly the centre of a screen displaying each of a series of eccentric accommodative targets placed at 5, 10 and 15°. An axial target was viewed for comparison purposes. Accommodation was measured using an open-field autorefractor, each stimulus being varied between about 0 and 4 D with spherical trial lenses placed in front of the viewing eye. The results confirm that the peripheral retina is sensitive to optical focus, up to field angles of at least 15°, with accommodative responses weakening as the peripheral angle increases. There is some evidence that peripheral accommodation may be less effective in myopes than emmetropes. Although peripheral accommodation can be demonstrated in the absence of a central stimulus, the accommodation response is normally dominated by the central stimulus and it seems unlikely that peripheral accommodation effects play an important role in refractive development.

Visual field does not affect steady-state accommodative response and near-work induced transient myopia

To investigate whether or not peripheral retinal defocus contributes to the refractive development of myopia by influencing the overall accommodative function. The steady-state accommodative stimulus response curve (ASRC) and the near-work induced transient myopia (NITM) after a near visual task were compared between different visual field conditions in emmetropes (EMMs), stable myopes (SMs) and progressing myopes (PMs). Results showed that visual field had no effect on the ASRC and NITM but PMs exhibited greater NITM than EMMs and SMs. The results of this study suggest that peripheral defocus does not influence the overall accommodative system so its probable contribution to myopia development is not via the accommodative system.

Cortical suppression during accommodation step responses

Purpose: Step changes in accommodation from distance to near take approximately 500 ms, during which time it is uncertain what visual information we perceive. A process of visual suppression seems to occur as we do not notice any blurring. In the present study we examine the visual processing capabilities by measuring contrast sensitivity during accommodation responses.Methods: Contrast thresholds were measured for two viewing conditions (dynamic and static) using a 2‐alternative forced‐choice staircase procedure. Sinusoidal [1, 4 cycles per degree (cpd)] and square wave (9 cpd) gratings were presented on a monitor at 1 m for the duration of 26 ms. In the dynamic condition a 2 dioptre (1–3D) far to near accommodation step response (ASR) was induced while contrast threshold measurements were taken every 100 ms after onset of the ASR. Results were compared to measurements taken in the static condition, where steady state accommodation responses were induced for five stimulus distances ranging from 1 m–33 cm.Results: We found that contrast sensitivity in the high spatial frequency condition (9 cpd) was significantly reduced in dynamic compared with static conditions. Differences found between the dynamic and static thresholds at low and mid spatial frequencies (1, 4 cpd) were inconsistent.Conclusion: The results suggest that the visual system employs high spatial frequency suppression during ASRs in order to minimize blur. These findings support a theory of oculomotor control in which the various oculomotor subsystems have both fast and slow components. The fast component exhibits pre‐programming and suppression of fine spatial detail, while the slow component shows continuous feedback control.

Static accommodative responses following adaptation to differential levels of blur

To investigate the effects of two levels of blur adaptation on visual resolution and steady-state accommodation responses in emmetropes and myopes. Eleven emmetropes (mean refractive error +0.01 +/- 0.31 DS) and 11 early-onset myopes (EOM, mean refractive error -4.44 +/- 1.64 DS) fixated monocularly at 4 m in three trials of 45 min duration with either: optimal refractive correction, +1 DS defocus, or +3 DS defocus. Monocular logMAR visual acuity (VA) was measured at 10 min intervals during each trial, and immediately following completion of the trial. Accommodative stimulus-response function (ASRF), refractive error and pupil size were measured before and after each trial. Blur adaptation was found to have no effect on pupil size or baseline refraction, irrespective of the power of the blurring lens. Adaptation to +1 DS of defocus yielded an improvement in VA of -0.16 +/- 0.07 logMAR and -0.17 +/- 0.11 logMAR in the emmetropes and myopes respectively. An improvement in VA of -0.20 +/- 0.18 logMAR in the emmetropes and -0.26 +/- 0.17 logMAR in the myopes was observed following adaptation to +3 DS of defocus. The changes in acuity became significant following 30 min of exposure to defocus. Blur adaptation was found to have no effect on the ASRF gradient or individual steady-state accommodative responses. Following blur adaptation, visual resolution was found to increase in both emmetropes and myopes. The magnitude of the blur level did not produce significantly different increases in resolution. Blur adaptation failed to affect either the steady-state responses to an accommodative stimulus or ASRF gradient.

Poster 28: Vocational Rehabilitation for a Nurse With Stargardt’s Disease

Accommodation, or the change in refractive power of the eye to focus objects at different distances, is driven by many stimuli including defocus blur, the awareness of target distance or proximal cues, and through the vergence crosslink (convergence acccommodation). The effectiveness of defocus blur as an accommodative stimulus is decreased in normally-sighted subjects as visual acuity is experimentally reduced and as the target is imaged at increasing eccentricities from the fovea. Since subjects with central retinal abnormalities have reduced visual acuity and typically fixate eccentrically, one would predict that defocus blur would not be an effective accommodative stimulus for them. Using an infrared optometer, steady-state accommodative responses of six subjects with juvenile macular degeneration (JMD) and of three normally-sighted controls were measured. The effectiveness of defocus blur in stimulating accommodation varied across the subjects and was related to visual acuity, with those subjects having worse acuity showing less accurate accommodative responses. When provided with additional cues to accommodative demand (i.e. proximal and/or binocular cues), subjects with JMD showed more accurate accommodative responses. In general, those subjects who did not modulate accommodative response with changing defocus blur cues showed the most accurate accommodation under binocular viewing. In contrast, those subjects who did change accommodative response with changing defocus blur cues showed the most accurate accommodation under monocular viewing.

Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus

Microfluctuations of accommodation are known to increase in magnitude with increasing accommodation stimulus. Reduced sensitivity to blur in myopic subjects could also lead to increases in the magnitude of the microfluctuations. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of variations in accommodation stimulus upon the microfluctuations in different refractive groups. Thirty-six subjects were divided into three groups depending upon their refractive error and age of onset of their myopia; 12 emmetropes (EMMs), 12 early onset myopes (EOMs) and 12 late-onset myopes (LOMs). Steady-state accommodation responses were recorded continuously for 2 min using the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor at a sampling rate of 52 Hz while viewing targets at accommodation stimuli levels of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 D in a Badal (+5 D) optical system. The EMMs and EOMs showed systematic increases in the root mean square (r.m.s.) value of the microfluctuations with increasing accommodation stimulus. In contrast, no systematic variation with accommodation stimulus was found for the LOMs. Power spectrum analysis demonstrated that increases in the size of the microfluctuations were mediated by increases in the power of the low frequency components of the accommodation response. The magnitude of the microfluctuations in the EMMs and EOMs may be influenced primarily by accommodation response-induced zonular relaxation effects or to changes in the physical properties of the accommodation plant with increasing accommodation response. The LOMs may have an increased baseline neural blur threshold, which appears to modulate the magnitude of the accommodative microfluctuations for low accommodation levels. At higher accommodation demands, the changes in the physical properties of the accommodation plant or the zonular relaxation effects appear to exceed the blur threshold, and the known association between microfluctuations and accommodation stimulus level is restored.

The Effect of Monocular and Binocular Viewing on the Accommodation Response to Real Targets in Emmetropia and Myopia

Decreased blur-sensitivity found in myopia has been linked with reduced accommodation responses and myopigenesis. Although the mechanism for myopia progression remains unclear, it is commonly known that myopic patients rarely report near visual symptoms and are generally very sensitive to small changes in their distance prescription. This experiment investigated the effect of monocular and binocular viewing on static and dynamic accommodation in emmetropes and myopes for real targets to monitor whether inaccuracies in the myopic accommodation response are maintained when a full set of visual cues, including size and disparity, is available. Monocular and binocular steady-state accommodation responses were measured with a Canon R1 autorefractor for target vergences ranging from 0-5 D in emmetropes (EMM), late-onset myopes (LOM), and early-onset myopes (EOM). Dynamic closed-loop accommodation responses for a stationary target at 0.25 m and step stimuli of two different magnitudes were recorded for both monocular and binocular viewing. All refractive groups showed similar accommodation stimulus response curves consistent with previously published data. Viewing a stationary near target monocularly, LOMs demonstrated slightly larger accommodation microfluctuations compared with EMMs and EOMs; however, this difference was absent under binocular viewing conditions. Dynamic accommodation step responses revealed significantly (p < 0.05) longer response times for the myopic subject groups for a number of step stimuli. No significant difference in either reaction time or the number of correct responses for a given number of step-vergence changes was found between the myopic groups and EMMs. When viewing real targets with size and disparity cues available, no significant differences in the accuracy of static and dynamic accommodation responses were found among EMM, EOM, and LOM. The results suggest that corrected myopes do not experience dioptric blur levels that are substantially different from emmetropes when they view free space targets.

Accommodation microfluctuations and pupil size during sustained viewing of visual display terminals

Accommodation microfluctuations comprise two dominant frequencies; a low frequency component (LFC⩽0.6Hz) and a high frequency component (1.0Hz<HFC<2.1Hz). In the present experiment we examine accommodation microfluctuations and steady-state pupil responses during sustained viewing of visual display terminals (VDTs). Steady-state accommodation and pupil responses were measured continuously and simultaneously using a modified Canon Autoref R-1 infra-red objective optometer and an Hamamatsu C3160 Perceptscope Video Area Analyser. Measurements were obtained at three time intervals (0, 10 and 20min) during a 20min reading task presented on five different displays. With the displays placed at 50cm, the task was to locate and identify typographical errors in one of five sets of standard text. Five young visually-normal emmetropic subjects with a mean age of 22.5±3.0 years participated in the study. Two-way ANOVA revealed no significant variation in the magnitude of the accommodation microfluctuations with either display or task duration, nor was there any significant interaction between these two factors. There was no significant variation in mean pupil diameter with either display or task duration. These measures may have the potential to provide objective information about visual display quality.

Single figure indices for the steady-state accommodative response

The slope of the regression line fit is often used to characterize an accommodation response—stimulus curve. It is argued that comparisons based on this parameter alone may be misleading, as also may be those using the intercept or correlation coefficient of the regression line. It is suggested that it would be more useful to compare curves on the basis of a combination of all three regression line parameters, together with the stimulus interval over which the fit is derived. A new parameter, the accommodative error index which is effectively the mean of the magnitude of the response error divided by the correlation coefficient, is proposed to achieve this.

Single figure indices for the steady-state accommodative response

The slope of the regression line fit is often used to characterize an accommodation response—stimulus curve. It is argued that comparisons based on this parameter alone may be misleading, as also may be those using the intercept or correlation coefficient of the regression line. It is suggested that it would be more useful to compare curves on the basis of a combination of all three regression line parameters, together with the stimulus interval over which the fit is derived. A new parameter, the accommodative error index which is effectively the mean of the magnitude of the response error divided by the correlation coefficient, is proposed to achieve this.

Accommodation in humans with juvenile macular degeneration

Accommodation, or the change in refractive power of the eye to focus objects at different distances, is driven by many stimuli including defocus blur, the awareness of target distance or proximal cues, and through the vergence crosslink (convergence acccommodation). The effectiveness of defocus blur as an accommodative stimulus is decreased in normally-sighted subjects as visual acuity is experimentally reduced and as the target is imaged at increasing eccentricities from the fovea. Since subjects with central retinal abnormalities have reduced visual acuity and typically fixate eccentrically, one would predict that defocus blur would not be an effective accommodative stimulus for them. Using an infrared optometer, steady-state accommodative responses of six subjects with juvenile macular degeneration (JMD) and of three normally-sighted controls were measured. The effectiveness of defocus blur in stimulating accommodation varied across the subjects and was related to visual acuity, with those subjects having worse acuity showing less accurate accommodative responses. When provided with additional cues to accommodative demand (i.e. proximal and/or binocular cues), subjects with JMD showed more accurate accommodative responses. In general, those subjects who did not modulate accommodative response with changing defocus blur cues showed the most accurate accommodation under binocular viewing. In contrast, those subjects who did change accommodative response with changing defocus blur cues showed the most accurate accommodation under monocular viewing.

Steady-state accomodation response and VDT screen conditions

Steady-state accommodation response was measured for seven different visual display terminal (VDT) screen conditions and a hard-copy control condition. The screen conditions included variations in screen polarity, contrast and chromatic characteristics of the text and background. Accomodation response was measured for seven young subjects using a free-space infrared optometer, the Canon Autoref R-1. The accomodation response was measured every 1.3 s over a period of 60 s for each test condition, and both the mean and standard deviation of the responses were derived. A small but significantly higher accomodation response was found for hard copy, blue-on-red and red-on-blue screen conditions compared with white-on-black, green-on-black and black-on-white screen conditions. Screen polarity and contrast had little effect on accomodation response for the black-and-white screen conditions. The variability of accommodation response showed little difference between test conitions. For short-term VDT screen viewing, the accomodation response appears to be relatively accurate and stable across a wide range of screen conditions.

Tonic accommodation: a review. II. Accommodative adaptation and clinical aspects.

Part I of this review considered basic aspects of tonic accommodation (TA), i.e. the accommodative response observed under degraded stimulus conditions. Part II considers accommodative adaptation, i.e. the apparent change in TA following periods of sustained fixation, and clinical aspects of both baseline TA and accommodative adaptation. It is suggested that the apparent post-task shift in TA reflects the slow rate of decay of the stimulus-mediated adaptive accommodative response, while the actual level of tonic innervation to the ciliary muscle remains relatively constant. The clinical implications of both TA and accommodative adaptation are discussed with regard to night, space and instrument myopia and refractive error development, notably nearwork-induced myopia. It is concluded that the evidence for any association between this form of myopia and either TA or accommodative adaptation is equivocal, and furthermore it seems likely that TA plays only a minor role in influencing the closed-loop steady-state accommodative response.

Accommodative microfluctuations and pupil diameter

The nominally steady-state accommodation response exhibits temporal variations which can be characterized by two dominant regions of activity; a low frequency component (LFC < 0.6 Hz) and a high frequency component (1.0 ⩽ HFC ⩽ 2.1 Hz). There is no consensus as to the relative contribution made by each of the frequency components of the microfluctuations to the control of steady-state accommodation. We investigate the effect of variations in artificial pupil diameter (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm pupils) on the microfluctuations of accommodation, while three young emmetropic subjects view, monocularly, a photopic high contrast Maltese cross target placed at a dioptric distance equal to their open-loop accommodation level. Average power spectra were calculated for five accommodation signals, each of 10 sec duration, collected for each viewing condition at a sampling rate of 102.4 Hz using a continuously recording infrared objective optometer. For artificial pupil diameters ⩽2 mm the power of die LFC was found to increase as a function of reducing pupil diameter, while for artificial pupil diameters >2 mm the LFC was found to be relatively constant. No systematic change in the HFC with varying artificial pupil diameter was observed. Changes in the root-mean-square (r.m.s.) value of the fluctuations with varying pupil diameter were significant (one-way ANOVA, F = 8.507, P = 0.0001, d.f. = 89) and showed a similar form to the changes in the LFC. The results support the conclusion of previous computer-derived models of accommodation control systems that control of steady-state accommodation may be mediated through the LFC of accommodative microfluctuations.