Code Status Research Articles

The Real-World Effect of Early Screening for Palliative Care Criteria in a Medical ICU: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Early identification of ICU patients likely to benefit from specialist palliative care could reduce the time such patients spend in the ICU receiving care inconsistent with their goals. To evaluate the real-world effects of early screening for palliative care criteria in a medical ICU. We performed a retrospective cohort study in adults admitted to the ICU using a causal inference approach with instrumental variable analysis. The intervention consisted of screening ICU admissions for palliative care trigger conditions, and if present, offering specialist palliative care consultation which could be accepted/declined by the ICU. We evaluated specialist palliative care use in pre- and post-implementation cohorts from the year before/after screening implementation began (October 2022). In the post-implementation cohort, we compared use of specialist palliative care in those who received early screening versus not. We then estimated the effect of early screening on the primary outcome of days to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status or ICU discharge, with death without a DNR order placed at the 99th percentile of the days to DNR or ICU discharge distribution. Secondary outcomes included: DNR order, ICU/hospital lengths of stay, hospice discharge, and mortality metrics. To address unmeasured confounding, we used two-stage least-squares instrumental variables analysis. The instrument, which predicts early screening, comprised weekend vs. weekday admission and number of patients meeting palliative care criteria on a patient's ICU days 1 and 2. Amongst 1282 post-implementation admissions, 626 (45%) received early screening, and 398 (28%) received specialty palliative consultation. Early receipt of specialist palliative care was higher in patients who received early screening vs. not (17% vs 1% , p<0.001), and overall use of specialty palliative care was higher post- vs. pre-screening implementation (28 vs. 15%, p<0.001). In the post-implementation cohort, there were no statistically significant effects of early screening on the primary outcome of days to DNR or ICU discharge (15% relative increase, 95% CI [-11% to +48%]) or other secondary outcomes. Despite significantly increased specialty palliative care consultation there was no evidence that early screening for palliative care criteria affected time to DNR/ICU discharge or other secondary outcomes.

Understanding characteristics and trajectories of patients experiencing early death after interhospital transfer.

Twenty- to fifty-thousand patients die annually within 72 h of interhospital transfer (early death after transfer; EDAT). The characteristics and trajectories of these patients are ill-defined. In this retrospective cohort study, we characterized EDAT at three representative major referral centers. Primary outcomes included the presence and timing of goals of care (GOC) and/or prognostic discussions. Among 190 medical patients experiencing EDAT, 95 (50.0%) were >65 years, 115 (60.5%) male, and 137 (72.6%) White; 140 (73.7%) patients traveled >50 miles from home, and 174 (91.6%) were referred for specialty care. Whereas GOC were documented pretransfer for 40 patients (21.1%) and unknown for 97 patients (51%); 152 (80.0%) had posttransfer discussions, often within 24 h of death (125; 82.2%). Transfer >50 miles was associated with death ≤24 h after transfer and with posttransfer changes in code status. Further research is needed to evaluate disparities and describe the potential burdens of transfer at end-of-life. Infrequent pretransfer discussions of GOC suggest potential targets for improvement.

Racial disparities in end-of-life care among patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

60 Background: Due to the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the prevalence of NETs now surpasses many other malignancies. Due to a slower course of disease and lack of awareness among care teams, end-of-life (EOL) care is typically underutilized in patients with NETs. Owing to a heavy symptom burden (related to disease burden and/or functionality), patients with NETs often struggle due to lack of palliative care and eventually EOL care support. Prior studies have revealed that Black patients with advanced cancer are more likely to receive aggressive care and suffer a significant decline in quality of life at EOL. However, similar data investigating racial differences in EOL among patients with NETs are lacking. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried between years 2016-2020 to identify all hospitalizations (regardless of site of origin) with NETs utilizing the appropriate ICD-10 codes (neuroendocrine carcinomas were excluded). Hospitalizations of White and Black patients with documented inpatient mortality events were then extracted. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed using independent sample t-test, Chi-square test, and binary logistic regression (adjusted for age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index or CCI). NIS discharge weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 28.0. A p-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 6,265 hospitalizations with NETs were included, of which 5,125 (81.8%) and 1,140 (18.2%) had White and Black patients respectively. Black patients were younger, more likely to be females, and less likely to have a do not resuscitate (DNR) code status. There was no significant difference in CCI between the groups. Palliative care consultation was less likely to be performed among Black patients (adjusted OR=0.70, p&lt;.001). Black patients also had longer mean length of stay in the hospital (10.25 vs 8.42 days, p&lt;.001). Black patients were also more likely to receive aggressive care in the form of mechanical ventilation at EOL (Table). Conclusions: This is the largest analysis demonstrating significant racial disparities in EOL care among patients with NETs. Black patients had longer inpatient stay, were less likely to receive inpatient palliative care consultation, have a DNR order and more likely to receive aggressive care at EOL. These findings may have implications for informing healthcare decision making for EOL care among Black patients with NETs. WhiteN=5125 BlackN=1140 aOR (95% CI) p-value Age (years) 67.67 ± 11.89 65.14 ± 11.29 - &lt;.001 Females 46.1% 50.9% - .004 CCI 11.0 ± 3.22 10.9 ± 3.42 - .538 Mean length of stay 8.42 ± 10.03 10.25 ± 15.75 - &lt;.001 Palliative 62.6% 54.5% 0.70 (.61-.80) &lt;.001 DNR 64.9% 60.1% 0.80 (.70-.92) .002 Blood transfusion 13.2% 15.4% 1.18 (.98-1.41) .052 Mechanical ventilation 28.8% 38.6% 1.55 (1.35-1.77) &lt;.001 Vasopressor 9% 9.6% 1.07 (.86-1.33) .47

Assessment and improvement of goals of care discussion by internal medicine residents.

191 Background: End-of-life goals and quality of life are intrinsically connected, focusing on providing care that maximizes comfort, dignity, and personal satisfaction during the final stages of life. Residents are primarily involved in Goals of care (GOC) discussion in hospitalized patients it is an integral component in Internal Medicine (IM) resident education. Literature has shown improved outcomes in delivering bad news by residents and oncology fellows after workshops, lectures, and courses. We aimed to improve Residents' competency in effective GOC discussion. Methods: We devised a questionnaire with the help of palliative care specialists and distributed it via a Google survey to the IM residents. After the survey, a palliative care specialist lectured about understanding the POLST form and components of Code Status Discussions. The same questionnaire was sent again. Five survey questions were used as post-lecture improvement parameters, and residents were stratified among three different classes: Interns, Year 2, and Year 3. Results: Before the lecture, residents were asked about their comfort level on a scale from 1-10, with 10 being the most comfortable conducting GOC discussions with the patient or the patient's family. As per the combined survey of all three classes, 50% of residents scored seven or above. Post lecture, 69.3% of intern year residents and 100% of 2nd and 3rd-year residents scored seven and above, which showed significant improvement in residents' comfort level while conducting GOC discussions. The parameters analyzed were the ability to explain SPIKES protocol for 'Breaking Bad News. Initially, 58.3% of the residents were comfortable explaining it, while 41.7 % answered negatively. After the survey, 84.6% from the intern year, 92.3% in 2nd year, and 77.8% of 3rd-year residents stated being comfortable with explaining SPIKES protocol. Another evaluated paradigm was the residents' ability to determine the patient's prognosis using any given scale/score (like the UCSF prognosis calculator). 33.3 % of the residents said 'yes' while 30.6% answered 'maybe.' Post-intervention, 100% of 3rd-year residents and 61.5% of 2nd-year residents, while 30.8% of intern-year residents said 'yes.' The cumulative mean of all three combined classes was 64.1%, which showed significant improvement compared to pre-intervention 33.3%. Conclusions: The results show that residents' comfort level of conducting GOC discussions improved with a single lecture on the topic. Further interventions and mentorship are needed. Intern-year residents were found to have a lower level of subjective comfort in conducting these discussions, which can be explained by their being relatively new to the work environment. A more integrated approach at the beginning of the residency training regarding GOC discussion training can improve interns' confidence and comfort for ensuing such discussions.

Does code status clarification for elderly patients being admitted from the emergency department make a difference?

Does code status clarification for elderly patients being admitted from the emergency department make a difference?

Physicians’ training and patient education initiative to improve quality of care decision communication at the emergency department

BackgroundDiscussions about care decisions, including code status documentation and advance care planning, are crucial components of patient-centred care. However, due to numerous barriers, these discussions are often avoided by both...

Integration of Palliative Care in Neurosurgical Critical Care : Insights from a Single-Center Perspective.

Palliative care is a specialized approach designed to enhance the quality of life for both patients and their families, offering patient-centered care through comprehensive assessment and care planning. However, the integration of palliative care within neuro-critical care settings has been relatively understudied. This descriptive study aims to identify the characteristics, palliative care needs, and outcomes of patients referred to palliative care services during admission to the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NS-ICU). A retrospective analysis of adults admitted to the NS-ICU at a referral hospital between December 2019 and December 2021 was conducted. The study focused on those referred to the inpatient palliative care team with diagnoses of non-traumatic brain hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, or brain neoplasm. Excluded were patients who died before palliative care consultation or lacked sufficient information. The investigation assessed demographic and clinical characteristics at consultation, along with post-consultation hospital outcomes derived from medical records and interview notes. In this study involving 38 enrolled patients, the median age was 65, with 42.1% females. The most prevalent diagnosis was non-traumatic brain hemorrhage (47.4%). Reasons for palliative care consultation included psychosocial support (95%), goal-of-care discussions (68%), decision-making support (50%), and communication facilitation (39%). The median time from NS-ICU admission to consultation was 3.5 days (range: 1-8 days), and all interviews involved family members. Key decision topics encompassed mechanical ventilation (23.7%) and tracheostomy (21.1%). Patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment could be estimated in only 47.4% of cases, often resulting in treatment disagreement. Among the 38 patients, 26 (68.4%) died during admission. Before the consultation, full code status, partial code status, and comfort care alone were reported as 32%, 66%, and 2%, respectively; post-consultation, these figures shifted to 11%, 42%, and 47%, respectively. Palliative care was predominantly sought for psychosocial support and discussions concerning goals of care. Despite challenges in ascertaining patient treatment preferences, palliative care consultations proved invaluable in aiding family members and facilitating treatment decision-making. Our study suggests the potential integration of palliative care within neuro-critical care, contributing to a heightened utilization of comfort care at the end-of-life.

Abstract C005: Predictors of advance care planning documentation in female patients with breast cancer: A multilevel model analysis

Abstract Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a process that supports adults at any age or stage of health in understanding and sharing their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. Likewise, ACP is associated with multiple benefits, such as lower rates of hospitalizations and reduced futile, aggressive cancer treatment at the end of life. However, ACP rates remain low in the U.S., especially for patients with advanced cancer. Despite being more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages and hospitalized due to advanced cancer with poor prognosis, the Black and Hispanic/Latino populations continue to have meager rates of ACP. Research has shown that both individual-level and systems-level factors contribute to these racial disparities in ACP. Considering these disparities among vulnerable populations, interventions that increase ACP among minority patients with cancer are needed. Objective: To analyze using multilevel model analysis the predictors of ACP documentation in female patients with breast cancer over 5 years in the UChicago Health System. Methods: Using the Clinical Data Research Warehouse, this study included women diagnosed with breast cancer (N=7,814) from 2016 to 2021. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize ACP, and potential differences in ACP rates among control variables were assessed using odds ratio (OR) estimations. Significantly correlated variables were included as covariates in the multivariate analyses through a logistic regression model. The multilevel random-effects (mixed-effects) model, using restricted maximum likelihood estimation, examined the pattern of ACP documentation; in the multilevel model, level 1 modeled the changes in individual ACP documentation, and level 2 included the between-subjects effects of the predictors of documentation. Results: 13.76% of women with breast cancer filled out at least one type of ACP documentation, 4.25% filled out the Power of Attorney, 5.75% filled out the Advance Directive, and 8.92% filled out the Code Status. Increasing age and being black/African-American seem to be related to an increased likelihood of completion of at least one type of ACP documentation. While increasing BMI and outpatient services seem to be related to a decrease in the likelihood of completing at least one type of ACP documentation. Conclusion: Understanding the factors related to ACP documentation will allow us to manage them and improve their completion. These results will help to inform the development of tools to increase the integration of ACP into care, especially those that are technology-based. Further work could include designing a predictive model to prioritize patients requiring ACP. Providing knowledge about ACP in nonclinical areas can lead to increased education about ACP and its benefits to families and communities. Citation Format: Andres Mauricio Garcia Sierra, Marcia Tan. Predictors of advance care planning documentation in female patients with breast cancer: A multilevel model analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C005.

EMPOWERING END-OF-LIFE CONVERSATIONS: The Role of Specialized Nursing Teams in Facilitating Code Status Changes at Discharge.

Objectives: Hospitalized patients may require goals of care (GOC) or Advance Health Care Planning (ACP), which can be time-consuming and emotionally tolling for providers. A nursing team specializing in code status (CODE), GOC, and ACP was developed to provide meaningful support for patients and families and decrease provider burden. Interest in CODE, GOC, ACP, and effectiveness of a nursing team to lead these conversations prompted this study. Methods: A collaborative nursing team was trained to address CODE, GOC, and ACP with patients demonstrating illness or geriatric syndrome. This team conducted 3 visits per patient on average during hospitalization using structured CODE templates to establish longer term goals and document what matters in the healthcare journey. Comprehensive narratives for ACP and GOC were included in charting, syncing the medical team, nursing, patient, and family. Consults were tracked over nine months with data reviewed retrospectively from medical charts. Descriptive analyses of cohort demographics, CODE and outcomes were completed. Results: The study group comprised 3342 patients between October 2022 and June 2023. Patients ranged in age from 18-106 years, with majority (88%) age 65 years and older. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.8 days with CODE documented for 91% upon admission. Of the 3166 older adults with known CODE on admission, 946 (30%) changed CODE by discharge, of which 95% were de-escalated. 83% of older patients arriving with limited CODE maintained limitations at discharge, with a small portion converting to comfort (16%). Conclusion: Employing a focused nursing team to conduct CODE, GOC, and ACP conversations may be an effective use of time and resources and result in de-escalation of resuscitation orders for patients demonstrating illness or geriatric syndrome.

Racial disparities in end-of-life suffering within surgical intensive care units

BackgroundEnd-of-life (EOL) care is associated with high resource utilization. Recognizing and effectively communicating that EOL is near promotes more patient-centered care, while decreasing futile interventions. We hypothesize that provider assessment...

Machine learning for targeted advance care planning in cancer patients: a quality improvement study

Context: Prognostication challenges contribute to delays in advance care planning (ACP) for patients with cancer near the end of life (EOL). Objectives: Examine a quality improvement mortality prediction algorithm intervention's impact on ACP documentation and EOL care. Methods: We implemented a validated mortality risk prediction machine learning model for solid malignancy patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) to a dedicated solid malignancy unit at Duke University Hospital. Clinicians received an email when a patient was identified as high-risk. We compared ACP documentation and EOL care outcomes before and after the notification intervention. We excluded patients with intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the first 24 hours. Comparisons involve chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests; comparisons stratified by physician specialty employ Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. Results: Pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts comprised 88 and 77 patients, respectively. Most were White, non-Hispanic/Latino, and married. ACP conversations were documented for 2.3% of hospitalizations pre-intervention vs. 80.5% post-intervention (p<0.001), and if the attending physician notified was a palliative care specialist (4.1% vs. 84.6%) or oncologist (0% vs. 76.3%) (p<0.001). There were no differences between groups in length of stay (LOS), hospice referral, code status change, ICU admissions or LOS, 30-day readmissions, 30-day ED visits, and inpatient and 30-day deaths. Conclusion: Identifying patients with cancer and high mortality risk via machine learning elicited a substantial increase in documented ACP conversations but did not impact EOL care. Our intervention showed promise in changing clinician behavior. Further integration of this model in clinical practice is ongoing.

The Hyperinflammatory Subphenotype Is Associated With Code Status De-Escalation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure

The Hyperinflammatory Subphenotype Is Associated With Code Status De-Escalation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure

The Role of Structured Goals of Care Discussions in Critically Ill Thoracic Surgery Patients.

Objective: The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. Results: In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, P = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, P = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, P = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, P = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, P = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. Discussion: Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.

An App Platform-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Outpatients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Rationale: Outpatients with interstitial lung disease often experience serious symptoms, yet infrequently receive palliative care. Objective: To determine the feasibility and clinical impact of a mobile application (PCplanner) in an outpatient setting. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among adults with interstitial lung disease in a single-center academic clinic. Clinical outcomes included change in Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) scale between baseline and 3 months as well as frequency of advance care planning discussions and referrals to palliative care services. Results: Observed feasibility outcomes were similar to targeted benchmarks including randomization rates (82.1% vs 80%) and retention (84.8% vs 80%). Mean NEST scores between the intervention and control group were 38.9 (SD, 18.9) vs 41.5 (SD, 20.5) at baseline, 34.6 (SD, 18.9) vs 33.6 (SD, 19.4) at 1 month after clinic visit, 40.5 (SD, 21.6) vs 35.3 (SD, 25.0) at 3 months after clinic visit. Changes in NEST scores between baseline and 3 months showed no difference in the primary outcome (P = 0.481, 95% CI [-8.45, 17.62]). Conclusion: Among patients with interstitial lung disease, a mobile app designed to focus patients and clinicians on palliative care principles demonstrated evidence of feasibility. Although changes in self-reported needs were similar between intervention and control groups, more patients in the intervention group updated their advance directives and code status compared to the control group. Clinical Trial Registration: Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner) NCT05095363. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05095363.

COASTing Through Bedside Report: An Innovative Approach to Safe Transitions of Care.

Bedside shift report improves patient satisfaction, peer accountability, communication, and decreases safety events. Clinical practice of bedside report varied prior to the pandemic. Due to limited personal protective equipment and exposure risk, bedside report was halted during the pandemic. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice was used to guide this project. To standardize communication during bedside report, safety data and literature were reviewed and grouped by themes. The acronym COAST was developed, consisting of code status, oxygen, access, safety, and tubes/drains. These elements were to be discussed at the bedside during handoff. Compliance with completing elements of COAST increased during the pilot, 9- and 12-month sustainment periods. Additional safety-related outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation wristband application, falls, and good catches improved. Notably, overtime declined. A bedside report with standardized communication focusing on safety elements can improve compliance with adoption and patient safety outcomes.

Optimizing outcomes: Impact of palliative care consultation timing in the cardiovascular intensive care unit

BackgroundICU patients and their families experience significant stress due to illness severity and prognostic uncertainty, making palliative care (PC) integral for symptom management, family support, and end-of-life care goals. The impact of PC in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) remains unstudied. ObjectiveWe explore the impact of early palliative care consultation (PCC) on patient outcomes in the CICU, including mortality, length of stay, and family meeting frequency. MethodsThis retrospective study at MedStar Washington Hospital Center included 209 adult patients admitted to the CICU between December 2021 and June 2022 receiving PCC. We compared outcomes between those receiving early (<72 h) and late (>72 h) PCC, including mortality, length of stay, and family meeting frequency. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact test, and Poisson regression models. ResultsThe study included 209 patients admitted to the (M age = 68 years, SD = 14; 45 % female; 62 % Black, 30 % White) who received PCC, most (79 %) within 72 h. Early PCC was associated with shorter CICU stays (median, 3 vs. 5.5 days; p = 0.005). Early PCC patients had higher odds of family meetings (IRR=3.59; p < 0.001) and experienced a change in code status sooner (median 1 day vs. 3 days, p < 0.001). Late PCC patients were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (13.6% vs. 2.4 %; p = 0.007), cardioversion (9.1% vs. 1.8 %; p = 0.037), and have PEG tubes placed (13.6% vs. 2.4 %; p = 0.007). ConclusionsEarly PCC in the CICU is associated with shorter CICU stays, fewer procedures, and more frequent family meetings.

Prior Advanced Care Planning and Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Emergency Department of a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes vary for patients with cancer. Here, we characterized cancer patients who underwent CPR in the emergency department (ED), their outcomes, and the effects of advanced care planning (ACP). The hospital databases and electronic medical records of cancer patients at a comprehensive cancer center who underwent CPR in the ED from 6 March 2016 to 31 December 2022 were reviewed for patient characteristics, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), conversion to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status afterward, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, mortality, cost of hospitalization, and prior GOC discussions. CPR occurred in 0.05% of all ED visits. Of the 100 included patients, 67 patients achieved ROSC, with 15% surviving to hospital discharge. The median survival was 26 h, and the 30-day mortality rate was 89%. Patients with and without prior ACP had no significant differences in demographics, metastatic involvement, achievement of ROSC, or in-hospital mortality, but patients with ACP were more likely to change their code status to DNR and had shorter stays in the ICU or hospital. In conclusion, few cancer patients undergo CPR in the ED. Whether this results from an increase in terminally ill patients choosing DNR status requires further study. ACP was associated with increased conversion to DNR after resuscitation and decreased hospital or ICU stays without an increase in overall mortality.

Does Reframing Do-Not-Resuscitate to Beneficial Care Only Increase Acceptance of No-CPR Orders?

BackgroundThe terminology of a do-not-resuscitate order (DNR) can be confusing and controversial for patients at the end of life. We examined whether changing the name to “Beneficial Care Only” (BCO) would increase patient acceptance. Research QuestionWould individuals be more willing to forgo full code status and accept a no-CPR order if the order title was “Beneficial Care Only”? Study Design and MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 599 adults residing in the United States, presenting participants with a hypothetical scenario of a terminal patient. Half were given a choice between “full code” (FC) and “DNR” status, and half were given a choice between FC and BCO status. The 20-item survey included multiple-choice responses and one free-response question. ResultsIn our nationally representative survey of U.S. participants who were 50% female and 26% nonwhite (99% response rate, n = 599/600), there was no difference in participant preference for BCO or DNR overall (p = 0.7616) and across participant sociodemographic characteristics. While themes of participant reasons for choosing against CPR were similar for both DNR and BCO preferences, including (1) harms imposed by CPR, (2) lack of quality of life, (3) trust in the medical team, (4) avoidance of suffering, two additional themes appeared only for BCO responses: (1) CPR would be useless, and (2) the patient would continue to receive beneficial care. InterpretationWe found no statistically significant difference in preference between BCO and DNR orders for a terminally ill patient. These findings suggest changing the terminology of DNR to BCO may not lead to changes in decisions to forgo CPR. The additional themes identified with the use of BCO support the concept that BCO terminology conveys to the recipient that all beneficial care will continue to be provided to the patient.

Identifying Prevalence and Potential Predictors of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Orders to Facilitate Preoperative Discussions on Code Status.

Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) orders allow patients with life-threatening conditions to decline resuscitation efforts should the need arise. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommends discussions with patients on their code status to clarify and honor their goals of care perioperatively. This project sought to determine the prevalence of DNAR orders and to identify the demographics and potential clinical predictors of DNAR status at the beginning and end of admission, which would help anesthesiologists at our center facilitate these discussions. Factors associated with DNAR status at beginning and at end of hospital stay were determined through univariate logistic regressions. For DNAR status at beginning and end of hospital admission, variables assessed were age at arrival, race, sex, palliative consult, use of palliative care service, length of stay in days, presence of surgery, presence of emergent surgery, care level, and medical service. Approximately 2.4 percent of the sample had an active DNAR order at the beginning of their hospital admission compared to 7.4 percent at the end of hospital admission. Factors significantly associated with DNAR status at the beginning of the hospital stay were consistent with prior literature (age, palliative care consult or service). However, factors significantly associated with DNAR status at the end of hospital stay that were notable included length of stay, undergoing emergent surgery, higher level of care, and being on the oncology service and medical respiratory intensive care unit. This retrospective study allows anesthesiologists at our institution to identify patients who may benefit from a more comprehensive perioperative discussion about code status based on certain clinical characteristics, which may improve quality of care by preventing unwanted resuscitative measures that do not align with a patient's goals of care.

Exploring Pediatric Code Status, Advance Care Planning, and Mode of Death Disparities at End of Life

ContextChildren from marginalized groups are at risk for worse medical outcomes, yet little is known about their end of life experiences. ObjectiveWe examine the characteristics of deceased children with a focus on race, ethnicity, and preferred language. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of patients who died at Texas Children's Hospital from 2018 to 2019. Demographics, date of death, and final code status were extracted. Medical complexity prior to admission and mode of death were obtained from chart review. ResultsWe included 433 patients. Over one-third were Hispanic (39.3%) with 42.3% preferring Spanish. The majority were White (61.4%) or Black (21.0%). Most patients had significant medical complexity (52.0%) or were infants in their birth admission (29.4%). Half (52.4%) received palliative care; patients with increased medical complexity were more likely to have palliative care involved (P<0.001). There were no differences in palliative care, code status, or mode of death by race. Hispanic patients were less likely to have a full code status (OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25–0.73). Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to have palliative care involvement (OR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.21–3.46) and less likely full code orders (OR 0.24, 95% CI: 0.1–0.63). ConclusionPalliative care services are engaged with most children at end of life and is accessible to marginalized patient groups. Spanish-speaking patients have different code status orders and modes of death at end of life. Further studies are needed to elucidate explanatory factors for differences revealed and multicenter studies are needed to characterize more widespread experiences.