Statistical Difference In Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Regorafenib Plus for third-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study.

e15562 Background: Regorafenib, approved as a monotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is recognized for its potential immunomodulatory effects and ability to reverse chemotherapeutic resistance. In response to this, a combination regimen known as regorafenib Plus has been customized for specific patients. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of regorafenib as a standalone treatment and in combination with other therapies (including concurrent/sequential chemotherapy, immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]) in the real-world setting. The goal is to present viable treatment options for patients with mCRC. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who underwent regorafenib treatment at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between January 2018 and October 2023 were stratified into two cohorts: monotherapy (Rego Mono) and concurrent/sequential combination therapy (Rego Plus). Index date was the initiation of regorafenib therapy in a sequence and median follow-up was 19.1 months. The clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 1/2-year OS rates. Results: A total of 67 pts were included (n = 39 Rego Mono; n = 28 Rego Plus). Baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly extended in the Rego Plus group compared to Rego Mono (8.0 vs. 3.6 months, P = 0.000), and overall survival (OS) was also notably prolonged (24.4 vs. 19.1 months, P = 0.046). The 1/2-year OS rates were also improved by Rego Plus (63% vs 37.1%, 25.5% vs 11.4%). However, there were no statistical differences in PFS between concurrent and sequential combination therapies (8.4 vs 8.0 mont). Notably, under sequential therapy, after 3.7 months of PFS with regorafenib alone, an additional 4.7 months of PFS was observed when combined therapy was introduced. Regarding safety, Rego Plus was associated with an increased rate of adverse events (AEs) without an escalation in severity. Common AEs included rash, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Rego Plus significantly prolonged PFS and OS in patients with chemo-refractory mCRC. Particularly when tumor stabilization is evident during monotherapy, the introduction of Rego Plus can offer a comparable or even longer PFS benefit, nearly doubling the PFS. Despite an elevated rate of AEs, the severity of these events did not increase, suggesting good tolerability. This approach has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of existing third-line therapies for mCRC, ultimately contributing to an improved prognosis for patients.

The efficiency and safety of low-dose apatinib combined with oral vinorelbine in pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Apatinib is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. Oral vinorelbine is a semisynthetic chemotherapeutic agent of vinorelbine alkaloids. Apatinib and oral vinorelbine have been proved to be effective in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). At present, several small sample clinical trials have explored the efficacy of apatinib combined with oral vinorelbine in the treatment of mBC. This retrospective study included 100 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative mBC patients who received low-dose apatinib (250 mg orally per day) plus oral vinorelbine until disease progression or intolerance during February 2017 and March 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were analyzed by SPSS 26.0 software and GraphPad Prism 8 software. Cox proportional hazards regression model for univariate and multivariate was used to identify factors significantly related to PFS and OS. The median follow-up time for this study was 38.1 months. Among 100 patients with HER2-negative mBC, 66 were hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative and 34 were triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The median PFS and OS were 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.2-6.8 months) and 23.0 months (95% CI, 19.9-26.1 months). There were no statistical differences in PFS (p = 0.239) and OS (p = 0.762) between the HR-positive /HER2-negative and TNBC subgroups. The ORR, CBR, and DCR were 21.0%, 58.0%, and 78.0%, respectively. Ninety-five patients (95.0%) experienced varying grades of adverse events (AEs) and 38.0% of patients for Grades 3-4. The most common Grades 3-4 AEs that we observed were neutropenia (30.0%) and leukopenia (25.0%). Low-dose apatinib combined with oral vinorelbine demonstrates potential efficacy and well tolerated for pretreated HER2-negative mBC.

Survival and safety analysis of COVID-19 vaccine in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 disease (COVID-19) has caused a worldwide challenging and threatening pandemic. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patient self-reported adverse events related to vaccines were recorded by follow-up through a uniform questionnaire. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox proportional hazard regression model to determine the effect of each variable on the survival of lung cancer patients. A total of 860 patients with NSCLC on treatment were enrolled. Mean age was 57 years in patients with early stage group and 62 years in advanced stage group. The vaccination rate was 71.11% for early-stage patients and 19.48% for advanced-stage patients; most of them (86.5%) received the COVID-19 inactivated virus (Vero cell) vaccine (Coronavac; Sinovac). The most common systemic adverse reaction was weakness. The main reason for vaccine refusal in those unvaccinated patients was concern about the safety of vaccination in the presence of a tumor and undergoing treatment (56.9% and 53.4%). The 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 100% for vaccinated and 97.4% for unvaccinated early-stage patients. Then we compared the progression-free survival (PFS) of vaccinated (median PFS 9.0 months) and unvaccinated (median PFS 7.0 months) advanced stage patients (p = 0.815). Advanced NSCLC patients continued to be divided into groups receiving radio-chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, with no statistical difference in PFS between the groups (p > 0.05). The median overall survival (OS) of vaccinated patients was 20.5 months, and that of unvaccinated patients was 19.0 months (p = 0.478) in advanced NSCLC patients. COVID-19 vaccination is safe for Chinese NSCLC patients actively receiving different antitumor treatments without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions, and vaccination does not affect cancer patient survival.

Comparative analysis of recurrence rates between intravesical gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction therapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumors in patients with intermediate- and high-risk bladder cancer: A retrospective multicenter study.

This study investigated the efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine as an alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. Data were retrospectively collected across seven institutions from February 1999 to May 2023. Inclusion criteria included patients with intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) and received at least four sessions of intravesical gemcitabine or BCG induction therapy. Patient characteristics, complete remission (CR), occurrence, and progression rates were compared. In total, 149 patients were included in this study (gemcitabine, 63; BCG, 86). No differences were apparent between the two groups in baseline characteristics, except for the follow-up period (gemcitabine, 9.2±5.9 months vs. BCG, 43.9±41.4 months, p<0.001). There were no consistent significant differences observed between the two groups in the 3-month (gemcitabine, 98.4% vs. BCG, 95.3%; p=0.848), 6-month (94.9% vs. 90.0%, respectively; p=0.793) and 1-year CR rates (84.2% vs. 83.3%, respectively; p=0.950). Also, there was no significant statistical difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (p=0.953). The occurrence rates of adverse events were similar between the groups (22.2% vs. 22.1%; p=0.989); however, the rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher was significantly higher in the BCG group (1.6% vs. 16.3%, respectively; p<0.001). Intravesical gemcitabine demonstrated efficacy comparable to BCG therapy for the first year in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. However, long-term follow-up studies are warranted.

A Retrospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Chidamide As a Maintenance Therapy for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a set of rare and highly heterogeneous tumors of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with inferior outcomes. Chidamide is a novel benzamide class of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor (HDACi) that was approved by the Chinese Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) PTCL patients. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of chidamide as a maintenance therapy after induction or salvage treatment in patients with PTCLs. Methods: The clinical data of 58 patients with different PTCL subtypes who received chidamide as a maintenance therapy after first-line or salvage treatment were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were analyzed. Results: Fifty-eight patients enrolled in our study between January 2015 and July 2022, of whom 39 patients received chidamide as a maintenance therapy after first-line treatment and 19 patients after salvage treatment. All patients started chidamide maintenance after reaching at least partial response (PR). The median age was 66 (29-83) years. Patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) represented the largest subgroup (34, 58.6%), followed by PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (10, 17.2%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) (8, 13.8%), NK/T cell lymphoma (NKTCL) (5, 8.6%) and monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma (MEITL) (1, 1.7%). Thirty-four (58.6%) patients were stage III-IV, and 38 (65.5%) patients had intermediate or high risk (prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) 2-4). Among the 39 patients who underwent chidamide maintenance after first-line treatment, 30/39 (76.9%) patients began maintenance after reaching complete response (CR) and 9/39 (23.1%) after achieving PR. Notably, 8/9 (88.9%) patients achieved CR from PR during maintenance treatment, with a median time of 6 (3-12) months. A total of 11/39 (28.2%) patients experienced disease progression during the maintenance treatment, and their median duration of remission was 6 (3-13) months. Among them, 2 patients experienced disease progression 2 to 3 months after drug withdrawal due to COVID-19 infection. A total of 19 patients who received maintenance treatment after salvage therapy, 9 (47.4%) received maintenance therapy after CR and 10 (52.6%) received maintenance therapy after PR. Among them, 9/19 (47.4%)had disease progression and their median duration of remission was 16 (2-25) months. The remaining 10 patients (8 CR and 2 PR) were still undergoing maintenance treatment and follow-up. The median maintenance treatment time for all patients was 16 (1-72) months, and the median maintenance dose was 20 (15-30) mg twice weekly. The median follow-up time was 39 (2-79) months, the median PFS was 33 months, and the median OS had not been reached (Figure 1 a, b) for all patients. The median PFS and OS of the patients who received first-line maintenance therapy were not reached, which were significantly better compared to patients who received chidamide as salvage treatment maintenance (the median PFS and OS were 7 and 67 months, P &amp;lt; 0.001, P = 0.009, respectively) (Figure 1 c, d). There was no statistical difference in PFS and OS among the different pathological subtypes, but AITL seemed to achieve better PFS (Figure 1 e, f). The most common toxicities were hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (42, 72.4%), anemia (23, 39.7%), and thrombocytopenia (29, 50.0%), followed by fatigue (35, 60.3%), anorexia (31, 53.4%), liver dysfunction (10, 17.2%), and pneumonia (4, 6.9%). Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2, and the grade 3‒4 adverse events were neutropenia (15/42), thrombocytopenia (7/29), fatigue (1/35), and pneumonia (2/4). Twelve (20.7%) patients underwent a dose reduction and three patients discontinued treatment (two patients with severe pulmonary infections, and one patient had intolerable fatigue) due to adverse events. One patient stopped maintenance treatment after taking chidamide for 10 months for financial reasons and he is still in follow-up. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that patients with chidamide maintenance therapy had a better PFS and OS with a manageable safety profile, especially as the first-line maintenance therapy. We conclude that chidamide can be used as a maintenance treatment to improve the survival of patients with PTCLs.

Comparison of the Efficiency of Induction and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

To make a comparative evaluation of induction chemotherapy (ICT) or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) added to standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients diagnosed with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC) (Stage 3-4a patients, except T3N0). Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, from April 2009 to June 2021. Clinicopathological features of adult patients diagnosed with LANPC were recorded from the hospital's patient registry database. Patients without the medical records were excluded. An assessment of the effectiveness of induction or ACT added to standard definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was performed, and the application cycles were evaluated. Seventy-four patients (71.6% male, mean age 50.8±11.7) with LANPC were included in the study. There is no statistical difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who applied ICT (before CRT) and ACT (after CRT) (p = 0.61). Female patients and patients aged ≤50 years had better PFS as independent factors (HR=3.82, 95% CI 1.14-12.74, p = 0.029; HR: 1.06 95% CI 1.02-1.10, p = 0.002, respectively). Also, patients aged 50 years and younger and female patients had a statistically longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.045, and p = 0.012, respectively). While there was statistically no significant difference in PFS according to the number of cycles for EBER-positive patients received adjuvant Cisplatin-5FU (CF); 3 cycles compared to 2 showed a statistically higher OS (p = 0.06, and p = 0.022, respectively). Conclusion: LANPC patients were found to have a positive survival if they were young and females. There was a positive impact on survival of intensified adjuvant CF in EBER-positive nonkeratinising, undifferentiated LANPC patients. Locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer, EBER, Induction chemotherapy, Adjuvant chemotherapy.

Real-world data of long-term survival in patients with T-cell lymphoma who underwent stem cell transplantation

This study aimed to identify the benefits of autologous-stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) and allogeneic-SCT (allo-SCT) in patients with aggressive T-cell lymphomas to aid in the selection of transplantation type in clinical practice. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 598 patients who underwent transplantation for T-cell lymphomas from 2010 to 2020. In total, 317 patients underwent up-front SCT as consolidation therapy. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.7% and 76.1%, respectively. Patients who underwent auto-SCT had significantly better OS (p = 0.026) than those who underwent allo-SCT; however, no statistical difference in PFS was found. Transplantation was used as a salvage therapy in 188 patients who had relapsed/refractory disease. Overall, 96 (51.1%) patients underwent auto-SCT and 92 (48.9%) patients underwent allo-SCT. Auto-SCT improved long-term survival in patients with complete remission (CR). Allo-SCT demonstrated better 3-year PFS in patients with partial remission and relapsed/refractory disease status. However, >50% of patients died within 1 year of allo-SCT. As a consolidative therapy, up-front auto-SCT demonstrated a survival benefit. Auto-SCT was also effective in patients who achieved CR after salvage therapy. If the disease persists or cannot be controlled, allo-SCT may be considered with reduced intensity conditioning.

Sequential therapy with crizotinib and a second-generation ALK inhibitor versus direct therapy of a second-generation ALK inhibitor in ALK-positive advanced lung cancer: a real-world study.

There are few real-world studies in which the efficacy of sequential crizotinib and second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are compared with direct therapy of second-generation ALK TKI in ALK-positive advanced lung cancer. Between May 2014 and October 2022, 211 patients from the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital who harbored ALK rearrangement were analyzed. Of these patients, 115 received crizotinib with sequential second-generation ALK TKIs, and 96 patients received a second-generation ALK TKI directly. The survival analysis of median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and central nervous system time to progression (CNS TTP) in the various groups were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Of the 211 lung cancer patients with ALK rearrangement, there were no statistical differences in PFS (25.27 vs. 20.47 months, P=0.644) and OS (70.27 months vs. not reached, P=0.991) between the 115 patients in the sequential therapy group and the 96 patients in the direct second-generation group. In the patients with baseline brain metastases at study entry (n=54), the sequential therapy group had a significantly shorter median CNS TTP than the direct second-generation group (10.40 vs. 22.40 months, P=0.040). Multivariate analyses revealed that the prognostic factors for PFS included performance status (PS, P=0.047) and brain metastases (P=0.010). For OS, the prognostic factors included PS (P=0.047) and liver metastases (P=0.021). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between first-generation sequential second-generation ALK TKIs and direct therapy of second-generation ALK TKI regimens. The CNS efficacy of the direct second-generation group was better than that of the sequential therapy group. The prognostic factors for PFS included PS and brain metastases, while the prognostic factors for OS, PS and liver metastases were included.

Assessing Long-term Treatment Benefits Using Complementary Statistical Approaches: An In Silico Analysis of the Phase III Keynote-045 and Checkmate-214 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials

BackgroundThe Keynote-045 trial illustrates that the long-term benefit (LTB) of treatment does not always translate to improved progression-free survival (PFS). Milestone survival and flexible parametric survival model with cure (FPCM) have been proposed as complementary statistical approaches to more comprehensively evaluate LTBs of treatments. ObjectiveThe current study compares milestone survival and FPCM analyses to evaluate treatment effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) phase III trials. Design, setting, and participantsIndividual patient data, from initial and follow-up analyses of Keynote-045 (urothelial cancer) and Checkmate-214 (advanced renal cell carcinoma), were reconstructed for PFS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisEach trial was reanalyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression and two complementary methods (milestone survival and FPCM) to estimate treatment impact on the LTB. Results and limitationsFor each trial, there was evidence of nonproportional hazards. For the long-term analysis of the Keynote-045 trial, FPCM identified a time-dependent effect on PFS, but the Cox model found no statistical difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.75–1.08). Milestone survival and FPCM identified improvements in the LTB fractions. This was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of Keynote-045, based on the shorter follow-up, although the LTB fraction was not retained. The increase in PFS in Checkmate-214 was identified by both Cox model and FPCM. Experimental treatment-dependent improvement in the LTB fraction was demonstrated using milestone survival and FPCM. The LTB fraction estimated with FPCM was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of the shorter follow-up period. ConclusionsAlthough ICIs show substantial shifts toward LTBs in terms of PFS, based on a conventional Kaplan-Meier or Cox model analysis, our approach provides an alternative assessment of benefit-risk ratios for new therapeutics and facilitates communicating risk to patients. Kidney patients treated with ICIs can be counseled that they are potentially cured, but future work will need to definitively validate this conclusion. Patient summaryAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments show substantial shifts toward long-term benefits in terms of progression-free survival, a more rigorous attempt to quantify this shift, rather than simply using a Kaplan-Meier estimate or comparing progression-free survival curves using the classic Cox model, is warranted. Our results suggest that advanced renal cell carcinoma patients who had not received a previous treatment are functionally cured by nivolumab and ipilimumab, which is not the case for second-line urothelial carcinoma.

Peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire dynamics in small cell lung cancer.

Identifying a circulating biomarker predictive of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) benefit in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains an unmet need. Characteristics of peripheral and intratumoral T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoires have been shown to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recognizing a knowledge gap, we sought to characterize circulating TCR repertoires and their relationship with clinical outcomes in SCLC. SCLC patients with limited (n=4) and extensive (n=10) stage disease were prospectively enrolled for blood collection and chart review. Targeted next-generation sequencing of TCR beta and alpha chains of peripheral blood samples was performed. Unique TCR clonotypes were defined by identical CDR3, V gene, and J gene nucleotide sequences of the beta chain and subsequently used to calculate TCR diversity indices. Patients with stable versus progressive and limited versus extensive stage disease did not demonstrate significant differences in V gene usage. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank analysis did not identify a statistical difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.900) or overall survival (OS) (P=0.200) between high and low on-treatment TCR diversity groups, although the high diversity group exhibited a trend toward increased OS. We report the second study investigating peripheral TCR repertoire diversity in SCLC. With a limited sample size, no statistically significant associations between peripheral TCR diversity and clinical outcomes were observed, though further study is warranted.

Clinical study of lenvatinib in the treatment of hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and antiviral therapy.

Background: Lenvatinib is recommended as a first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2017. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical action of lenvatinib in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC. Methods: A continuous cohort of advanced HCC was retrospectively enrolled. And the patients were divided into HBV-related HCC and HCV-related HCC based on previous history of hepatitis virus infection. Then propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to compare objective response rate (ORR),disease control rate (DCR),progression-free survival (PFS),overall survival (OS) and safety between the two groups. Results: A total of 203 eligible patients were included, with 72 HBV-related HCC and 36 HCV-related HCC after PSM. Both ORR (20.8% vs. 5.6%, P = .0759) and DCR (76.4% vs. 52.8%, P = .0232) were significantly higher in the HBV-related HCC than in the HCV-related HCC. Although no statistical differences in PFS (6.1months vs. 3.3months, P = .17) and OS (14.9months vs. 17.7months, P = .96) were observed between the two groups, there was a trend of difference in the PFS survival curve. On multivariate regression analysis of PFS, both HBV infection (HR, .54; 95% CI, .31-.95; P = .0332) and antiviral time >5years (HR, .49; 95% CI, .26-.9; P = .0219) were identified as independent favorable factors, and AFP >200ng/mL (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.1-3.22; P = .0216) were found to be an independent adverse factor. In addition, compared with HCC who received the first dose of antiviral drugs less than 5years, the patients who were administered those drugs over 5years had a significantly favorable PFS (11.27months vs. 3.87 months, P = .0011). Lenvatinib was well tolerated in all patients and the adverse events (AEs) were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: It seemed that lenvatinib benefited more in HBV-related advanced HCC in delaying disease progression, compared to those with HCV-related advanced HCC.

Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in myelodysplastic syndrome

ABSTRACTBackgroundPrognostic nutritional index has been found to be related to the clinical outcomes of patients with cancer. However, its role in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients is unclear. We aimed to assess the value of nutritional status in predicting the prognosis of MDS patients.MethodsTotally 121 MDS patients were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was used to assess nutritional status of the patients. The bio-informatics tool X-tile was used to define the threshold, and accordingly patients were divided into PNIlow and PNIhigh groups, the characteristics were compared between two groups.ResultsThe PNIhigh was associated with better OS (Overall Survival) than PNIlow in MDS patients (Median OS, 28.03 months versus 19.63 months, P = 0.0205). But there were no statistical differences in PFS (Progression-Free-Survival) between the two groups (P = 0.9373). The univariable and multivariable COX proportional hazard analysis adjusted for age, gender, platelet count, HB level and IPSS-R scores, and the results showed that PNI is a useful index in the evaluation of the OS of MDS (HR 0.588, 95%CI 0.374–0.926, P = 0.024).ConclusionPNI would be a simple and immediately available tool for predicting the prognosis of MDS.

Dynamic monitoring of serum tumor markers as prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line immunotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study

Background: To date, no specific studies have reported the use of dynamic serum tumor markers (STMs) as prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive first-line immunotherapy. Therefore, it is unclear whether STMs can be used as a prognostic factor for first-line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Objectives: To elucidate the role of STMs in monitoring immunotherapy response in advanced NSCLC. Patients were treated with first-line programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors at four Chinese centers. Design: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Methods: Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 6–8 weeks of treatment. Computed tomography scans were used to evaluate treatment efficacy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Post-treatment drops in STMs [Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA21-1), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125)] were decreased ⩾20% (Group C) over baseline was used as cutoff level for defining a marker response. If STMs were increased by ⩾20% after treatment, the therapeutic effect was limited (Group A). Patients with STM changes between a 20% increase or decrease were enrolled in Group B. In univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses, STMs and RECIST responses were analyzed for their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The analysis included 716 patients. By multivariate analysis, CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, CA19-9, and CA125 (Group A versus Group B and Group A versus Group C) were associated with significant differences in PFS. Similar results were observed in the OS analysis. Similar results were observed in the adenocarcinoma subgroup analyses. In squamous cell carcinoma subgroup analyses, there was no statistical difference in PFS ( p = 0.147) or OS ( p = 0.068) between Group A and Group B for CA125. Conclusion: The increase and decrease in serum levels of STMs might be reliable prognostic factors for immunotherapy efficacy in NSCLC patients.

PD-1 inhibitor versus bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective-real world study.

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or anti-vascular therapy is both recommended by guidelines for first-line treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. However, no head-to-head clinical trial has ever compared which strategy is the optimal choice. This real-world retrospective study was done to compare the efficacy and treatment-related adverse events of immunotherapy and bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. From January 2018 to March 2021, we retrospectively collected 276 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma managed with chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or PD-1 inhibitors at our center. Among them, 139 patients were treated with chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab, while 137 patients were treated with chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitors. After receiving four cycles of combination therapy, all patients received maintenance therapy until disease progression. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AE) were analyzed between the two groups. Compared to patients who received anti-vascular therapy, patients who underwent immunotherapy achieved better PFS (7.3 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.002) while ORR (40.9% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.093), as well as OS (18 months vs. 24 months, p = 0.060), had no statistical difference between the two groups. In the PD-L1-negative population, there was no statistical difference in PFS and OS between the two groups. (8.0 months VS. 6.0 months, p = 0.738; and 19 months vs. 13 months, p = 0.274). In the PD-L1-positive population, there was a significant benefit in PFS in the population receiving immunotherapy (7.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.009). Proteinuria and hypertension occurred more frequently in the bevacizumab-treated group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002), whereas immune-related pneumonia and hypothyroidism occurred more frequently in the immunotherapy-treated group (p = 0.007 and p = 0.030). The addition of a PD-1 inhibitor was superior to bevacizumab in terms of PFS among patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. PD-L1-positive patients appeared to exhibit better PFS, OS, and ORR. Toxic reactions were manageable in both groups.

Prognostic value of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

BackgroundMyelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous spectrum of clonal hematopoietic disorders with varying degrees of cytopenia and morphologic dysplasia. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, an easy-to-use tool for assessing the nutritional status, was reported as an independent prognostic factor in cancer patients. However, its role in patients with MDS is unclear.ObjectiveWe aimed to explore the impact of CONUT score on the prognosis of patients with MDS, which is of great significance for clinical treatment.MethodsA total of 121 patients with MDS were analyzed. The CONUT score was calculated prior to therapy. The bio-informatics tool X-tile was used to define the CONUT score and the threshold of 4 points was determined to predict the prognosis. Patients were divided into CONUTlow and CONUThigh groups, and the characteristics were compared between two groups.ResultsResults show that CONUTlow was associated with better overall survival (OS) than CONUThigh patients (Median OS, 30.20 vs. 19.63 months, p = 0.0003). However, there were no statistical differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups (p = 0.2683). Results of univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard analysis adjusted for bone marrow blasts level, platelet count, International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) scores, gender, and hemoglobin (Hb) level showed that the CONUT score was useful in the evaluation standard of OS of MDS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.297, 95% CI 1.441–3.663, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe CONUT, as a novel immuno-nutritional biomarker, may be useful in predicting the OS of MDS.

The Long-Term and Short-Term Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundAlthough immunotherapy has been widely used, there is currently no research comparing immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs). This meta-analysis addresses a gap in the comparison of immunotherapy efficacy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and ICI combined CT or RT.MethodsA search of Pubmed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov was conducted to identify studies which enrolled NSCLC patients with BM treated with ICIs. The outcomes consisted of intracerebral overall response rate (iORR), intracerebral disease control rate (iDCR), extracranial overall response rate (EORR), distant brain failure (DBF), local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 3160 participants from 46 trials were included in the final analysis. Patients treated with immunotherapy were associated with a longer PFS (0.48, 95%CI: 0.41-0.56), and a longer OS (0.64, 95%CI: 0.60-0.69) compared with immunotherapy-naive patients. In prospective studies, dual ICI combined CT and ICI combined CT achieved a better OS. The hazard ratio (HR) of dual ICI combined CT versus dual ICI was 0.61, and the HR of ICI combined CT versus ICI monotherapy was 0.58. Moreover, no statistical difference in PFS, OS, EORR, iORR, iDCR, and EDCR was found between patients with ICI monotherapy and ICI combined cranial radiotherapy. Concurrent ICI combined RT was shown to decrease the rate of DBF (OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.73) compared with RT after ICI. Patients treated with WBRT might have an inferior efficacy than those with SRS because the iORR of SRS was 0.75 (0.70, 0.80) and WBRT was 0. Furthermore, no obvious difference in PFS and OS was observed among the three different types of ICI, which targets PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, respectively.ConclusionsPatients treated with ICI got superior efficacy to those without ICI. Furthermore, dual ICI combined CT and ICI combined CT seemed to be optimal for NSCLC patients with BM. In terms of response and survival, concurrent administration of SRS and ICI led to better outcomes for patients with BMs than non-concurrent or non-SRS.Importance of the StudyIn the new era of immunotherapy, our meta-analysis validated the importance of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs). By comparing the long-term and short-term impacts of various regimens, all immunotherapy treatments had superior efficacy to immunotherapy-naive. At the same time, through pairwise comparison in immunotherapy, our findings can help clinicians to make treatment decisions for NSCLC patients with BMs.Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=269621, identifier CRD42021269621.

Prognostic Impact of Platelet-Large Cell Ratio In Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

BackgroundMyelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a very heterogeneous group of myeloid disorders with high prevalence and risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia. The more accurate risk stratification can provide a better guidance of treatment. The platelet–large cell ratio (P-LCR) is a parameter reported in complete blood cell count tests, and was associated with many diseases, but its role in MDS is not clear.PurposeThis study aims to explore the impact of the P-LCR on the prognosis of patients with MDS, which is of great significance for clinical treatment.MethodsIn the retrospective study, 122 newly diagnosed MDS patients were enrolled. We used the bioinformatics tool X-tile to define a P-LCR threshold of 36.7% to predict prognosis. Patients were divided into P-LCRlow and P-LCRhigh groups, and their characteristics were compared between the two groups.ResultsResults show that the P-LCRlow was associated with worse overall survival (OS) than the P-LCRhigh patients (median OS, 18.53 months versus 25.77 months, p=0.0057), but there were no statistical differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups (p=0.2001). The results of univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses adjusted for gender, bone marrow blast level, platelet count, and International Prognostic Scoring System scores showed that the P-LCR was useful in the evaluation of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.212, 95%CI 0.064–0.702, p=0.011] and OS of MDS (HR 0.464, 95%CI 0.284–0.757, p=0.002).ConclusionThis study is the first report showing that the P-LCR would be a simple and immediately available biomarker for predicting the prognosis of MDS.

Efficacy Outcomes of Isatuximab with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Are Comparable to (ICARIA-MM) Trial Data: Initial Results of a UK-Wide Real-World Study of Relapsed Myeloma Patients

Efficacy Outcomes of Isatuximab with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Are Comparable to (ICARIA-MM) Trial Data: Initial Results of a UK-Wide Real-World Study of Relapsed Myeloma Patients

Radiation Plus Anti-PD-1 Therapy for NSCLC Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundRadiation therapy (RT) is the mainstay of brain metastases (BMs), and anti-PD-1 blockade has led to intracranial responses in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with BMs.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding anti-PD-1 blockade to RT in the management of NSCLC patients with BM in terms of survival outcome.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 70 NSCLC patients with BMs who were treated with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) between January 2016 and January 2021. Of the 70 patients, 29 additionally received anti-PD-1 therapy within 30 days of WBRT initiation. Baseline characteristics of the patients and efficacy outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were statistically compared using SPSS v26. Results were obtained using the Chi-square test/Fisher exact test, t-test, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression survival analyses.ResultsThe median survival for the entire cohort was 24 months (95% CI, 19.5–28.5). The median survival times for WBRT alone and WBRT plus anti-PD-1 therapy cohorts were 20 months (95% CI, 11.6–28.3) and 27 months (95% CI, 19.5–28.5), respectively (p=0.035). There was no statistical difference in PFS for the treatment cohorts (median PFS for WBRT alone: 7 months vs. 12 months for WBRT plus anti-PD-1, p=0.247). In EGFR wild-type subgroup (n=31), both PFS (p=0.037) and OS (p=0.012) were significantly improved. Only the treatment group (WBRT plus anti-PD-1) was a significant predictor of OS on univariate and multivariate analyses (p=0.040). There were no significant differences in adverse events among the treatment groups.ConclusionsNSCLC patients with BM receiving additional anti-PD-1 therapy may derive better OS than WBRT alone without any increase in adverse events. Prospective well-designed studies are warranted to validate and elucidate the additive effects of the two modalities in this group of patients.

Are Absolute Monocyte Count and The Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) Valid Prognostic Factors In Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma? An Evaluation Based On Data From 1079 Patients

IntroductionThere is an increasing amount of data showing that both host immunity and tumor microenvironment play an essential role in determining the clinical course in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and may also influence their response to therapy. Some investigators have considered the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as a surrogate bio-marker of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes reflecting systemic host immunity, while the absolute monocyte count (AMC) is regarded as a surrogate bio-marker of tumor-associated macrophages reflecting the tumor microenvironment. For many years lymphopenia has been considered as a negative factor predicting poor outcome in HL. Recently monocytosis and the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR= ALC/AMC), which combines these two surrogate bio-markers, have also been shown to be useful prognostic parameters in HL, particularly in terms of progression free survival (PFS). AimsThe aim of the present study was to verify whether AMC and LMR are indeed valid prognostic parameters in HL, utilizing a large cohort of patients with the disease. Materials and MethodsWe collected data from 1079 patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) enrolled in different clinical trials of “Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi (GISL)” during 1988-2007. Previously we had evaluated a database of 371 patients with cHL and examined different AMC and LMR cut-off levels using the maximum log rank test and c-Harell (area under the curve). We identified AMC of 600/mm3 and LMR of 3.5, as optimal cut-off values. ResultsPatients in our current study had the following characteristics: median age 32 years (range 17-71), 51% males, 15% stage IV disease, 74% with International Prognostic Score (IPS) 0-2, 72% nodular sclerosis and 18% mixed cellularity; 43% were treated with ABVD and 29% with BEACOPP/BEACOPP-like regimens. Radiotherapy (RT) was administered to 66% of cases. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (range 0.1-19), and 5-years and 10-years overall survival (OS) was 89 and 83%, respectively; 5-years PFS was 79%. In an earlier evaluation the 10-years PFS for patients with AMC >600/mm3 and LMR <3.5 was significantly worse, compared to the group with AMC <600/mm3 and LMR >3.5 (p-value: 0.032 and 0.005). However now after applying the same cut-off values to the larger database, we found no statistical differences in PFS ,and both threshold values for AMC (600/mm3) and LMR (3.5) lost their prognostic power. Using the same statistical methods for the cohort of 1079 patients, we found different cut-off values for AMC and LMR, that were equally effective in splitting different survival patterns. For AMC the value of 750/mm3 (26% of patients with AMC >750/mm3), and for LMR a ratio of 1.5 (19% of patients with LMR <1.5) revealed a difference in PFS which was statistically significant (p-value 0.003 and 0.001, respectively), as shown in Figure 1. In multivariate analysis after adjusting by IPS, RT and type of chemotherapy regimen administered, AMC and LMR maintained their prognostic significance for PFS (HR 1.37, p 0.022 and 1.37, p 0.037). After interaction with IPS (Figure 2) LMR showed an uniform pattern within the two risk -groups (overall: HR=1.42, p 0.019; IPS 0-2: HR=1.34, p 0.181; IPS 3-7: HR=1.49, p 0.048). [Display omitted] [Display omitted] ConclusionsOur study of 1079 patients confirms that peripheral monocyte and lymphocyte counts have an important prognostic impact in cHL. The cut off-values we used, although different from those utilized previously, were able to distinguish patients with different PFS. The cut-offs reported in the literature vary according to the different authors and the various sets of patients examined. At present we feel there is still a clear need to finally establish definitive and more appropriate cut-off levels that can be used for all future studies. In order to achieve this goal, it is essential to study an even larger series of patients within the framework of an international collaborative study. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.