Evaluating the brittleness of rocks or rock masses is a fundamental problem in geotechnical engineering. This study proposed a new index that expresses brittleness as the rate of damage development in rock. The brittleness index was derived from statistical damage theory. It depends on the four material parameters, i.e., the peak strain, peak strength, Poisson’s ratio and elastic modulus. The validity of the proposed brittleness index was confirmed through two case studies, including triaxial compression test results for coals subjected to varying confining pressures and for sandstones at various temperatures. Uniaxial compression experiments were then performed on rock-like materials to examine the effects of model size and joint dip angle on rock brittleness using the proposed brittleness index. Results show that the brittleness of the jointed specimens varies in a complex pattern with the model size and joint dip angle. Generally, the brittleness index initially reduces and then grows with the increasing joint dip angle, and larger specimens tend to be more brittle. Furthermore, large specimens containing horizontal or vertical joints are particularly susceptible to brittle damage. The proposed brittleness index has merits such as a clear physical meaning and simple expression, making it a valuable tool for evaluating rock brittleness.