The performance of several methods for the calculation of vertical ionization potentials (IPs) or, more generally, electron-detachment energies based on unitary coupled-cluster (UCC) theory and the algebraic-diagrammatic construction (ADC) scheme is evaluated with respect to benchmark data computed at the level of equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory, including single, double, and triple excitations (IP-EOM-CCSDT). Based on a statistical evaluation of about 200 electron-detached states of 41 molecules, the second-order methods IP-ADC(2) and IP-UCC2 show modest accuracies with IP-EOM-CCSDT as reference, exposing a mean signed error and a standard deviation of the error of -0.54 ± 0.50 and -0.49 ± 0.54eV, respectively, accompanied by a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.61 and 0.58eV, respectively. The strict third-order IP-ADC method demonstrates an accuracy of 0.26 ± 0.35eV (MAE = 0.35eV), while the IP-UCC3 method is slightly more accurate with 0.24 ± 0.26eV (MAE = 0.29eV). Employing the static self-energy computed using the Dyson expansion method (DEM) improves the IP-ADC(3) performance to 0.27 ± 0.28eV, with the mean absolute error of this method being 0.32eV. However, employing the simpler improved fourth-order scheme Σ(4+) for the static self-energy provides almost identical results as the DEM. Based on the quality of the present benchmark results, it therefore appears not necessary to use the computationally more demanding DEM.
Read full abstract