State Trauma System Research Articles

Trauma system management of adults with severe burns in Victoria, Australia.

The aim of the present study was to examine the profile, management and outcomes of adult patients with severe burns within the Victorian State Trauma System (VSTS). Data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) was analysed to characterise patient and injury characteristics and review pre-hospital management and clinical outcomes of adult patients with severe burns. There were 421 cases over 13 years of the study. Approximately 80% of cases were flame burns, and 5% were associated with other significant trauma. Approximately 75% were male; with 83% of patients under 65 years old, 40% of lower socioeconomic status, 25% having pre-existing drug and alcohol involvement, and 36% living with associated comorbidities. All but 11 patients (of 421) were managed definitively at the burns service. Around one-third of patients had interhospital transfer, with median (interquartile range (IQR)) time spent in the primary hospital 3.0 (1.9-4.3) h. Only five patients had multiple interhospital transfers. Nearly 75% of patients were admitted to an ICU. The median (IQR) length of definitive hospital stay was 27.2 (11.2-44.9) days. The mortality rate was 23.8%. Severe burns are uncommon injuries with high mortality. There is a high rate of adherence to VSTS guidelines for managing patients with severe burns, and a decrease in patients requiring transfer associated with an increase in acceptable time to a trauma-receiving hospital. The VSTS operates to deliver almost all patients with severe burns to the definitive burns service efficiently.

Level One Trauma Center Proliferation May Worsen Patient Outcomes.

From 2013 to 2020, Arizona state trauma system expanded from seven to thirteen level 1 trauma centers (L1TCs). This study utilized the state trauma registry to analyze the effect of L1TC proliferation on patient outcomes. Adult patients age≥15 in the state trauma registry from 2007-2020 were queried for demographic, injury, and outcome variables. These variables were compared across the 2 time periods: 2007-2012 as pre-proliferation (PRE) and 2013-2020 as post-proliferation (POST). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess independent predictors of mortality. Subgroup analyses were done for Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥15, age≥65, and trauma mechanisms. A total of 482,896 trauma patients were included in this study. 40% were female, 29% were geriatric patients, and 8.6% sustained penetrating trauma. The median ISS was 4. Inpatient mortality overall was 2.7%. POST consisted of more female, geriatric, and blunt trauma patients (P < .001). Both periods had similar median ISS. POST had more interfacility transfers (14.5% vs 10.3%, P < .001). Inpatient, unadjusted mortality decreased by .5% in POST (P < .001). After adjusting for age, gender, ISS, and trauma mechanism, being in POST was predictive of death (OR: 1.4, CI:1.3-1.5, P < .001). This was consistent across all subgroups except for geriatric subgroup, which there was no significant correlation. Despite advances in trauma care and almost doubling of L1TCs, POST had minimal reduction of unadjusted mortality and was an independent predictor of death. Results suggest increasing number of L1TCs alone may not improve mortality. Alternative approaches should be sought with future regional trauma system design and implementation.

Discussion.

Discussion.

Definitive management of near-hanging at major versus non-major trauma centres.

The Victorian State Trauma System recommends that all major trauma patients receive definitive care at a major trauma service (MTS). The aim of the present study was to assess the outcomes of patients with major trauma after near-hangings who received definitive management at an MTS compared to a non-MTS. This was a registry-based cohort study of all adult (age ≥16 years) patients with near-hanging included in the Victorian State Trauma Registry from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2019. Outcomes of interest were death at hospital discharge, time to death and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) score of 5-8 (favourable) at 6 months. There were 243 patients included and 134 (55.1%) in-hospital deaths. Among patients presenting to a non-MTS, 24 (16.8%) were transferred to an MTS. There were 59 (47.6%) deaths at an MTS and 75 (63.0%) at a non-MTS (odds ratio [OR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.89). However, more patients were managed at a non-MTS after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (58.8% vs 50.8%) and less patients had serious neck injury (0.8% vs 11.3%). After adjustment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and serious neck injury, management at an MTS was not associated with mortality (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.61; 95% CI 0.23-1.65) or favourable GOSE at 6 months (aOR 1.09; 95% CI 0.40-3.03). After major trauma sustained from near-hanging, definitive management at an MTS did not offer a mortality benefit or better functional outcomes. Consistent with current practice, these findings suggest that most near-hanging related major trauma patients could be managed safely at a non-MTS.

Prehospital and emergency department pediatric readiness for injured children: A statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Emergency Medical Services Committee.

Injury is the leading cause of death in children older than 1 year, and children make up 22% of the population. Pediatric readiness (PR) of the nation's emergency departments and state trauma and emergency medical services (EMS) systems is conceptually important and vital to mitigate mortality and morbidity in this population. The extension of PR to the trauma community has become a focused area for training, staffing, education, and equipment at all levels of trauma center designation, and there is evidence that a higher level of emergency department PR is independently associated with long-term survival among injured children. Although less well studied, there is an associated need for EMS PR, which is relevant to the injured child who needs assessment, treatment, triage, and transport to a trauma center. We outline a blueprint along with recommendations for incorporating PR into trauma system development in this opinion from the EMS Committee of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. These recommendations are particularly pertinent in the rural and underserved areas of the United States but are directed toward all levels of professionals who care for an injured child along the trauma continuum of care.

Access to Immediately Available Balanced Blood Products in a Rural State's Trauma System.

The Arkansas Trauma System was established by law more than a dozen years ago, and all participating trauma centers are required to maintain red blood cells. Since then, there has been a paradigm shift in resuscitating exsanguinating trauma patients. Damage Control Resuscitation with balanced blood products (or whole blood) and minimal crystalloid is now the standard of care. This project aimed to determine access to balanced blood products in our state's Trauma System (TS). A survey of all trauma centers in the Arkansas TS was conducted, and geospatial analysis was performed. Immediately Available Balanced Blood (IABB) was defined as at least 2 units (U) of thawed plasma (TP) or never frozen plasma (NFP), 4 units of red blood cells (RBCs), 2 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and 1 unit of platelets or 2 units of whole blood (WB). All 64 trauma centers in the state TS completed the survey. All level I, II, and III Trauma Centers (TCs) maintain RBC, plasma, and platelets, but only half of the level II and 16% of the level III TCs have thawed or never frozen plasma. A third of level IV TCs maintain only RBCs, while only 1 had platelets, and none had thawed plasma. 85% of people in our state are within 30min of RBCs, almost two-thirds are within 30min of plasma (TP, NFP, or FFP) and platelets, while only a third are within 30min of IABB. More than 90% are within an hour of plasma and platelets, while only 60% are within that time from an IABB. The median drive times for Arkansas from RBC, plasma (TP, NFP, or FFP), platelets, and an immediately available and balanced blood bank are 19, 21, 32, and 59minutes, respectively. A lack of thawed or non-frozen plasma and platelets are the most common limitations of IABB. One level III TC in the state maintains WB, which would alleviate the limited access to IABB. Only 16% of the trauma centers in Arkansas can provide IABB, and only 61% of the population can reach IABB within 60minutes. Opportunities exist to reduce the time to balanced blood products by selectively distributing WB, TP, or NFP to hospitals in our state trauma system.

Obstetrical Trauma: Reducing the Burden of Trauma Transfer to Tertiary Care Centers.

In rural state trauma systems, management of the obstetrical trauma patient often defaults to transfer to level I trauma centers. We evaluate the necessity of transferring obstetrical trauma patients without severe maternal injury. A retrospective 5-year review of obstetrical trauma patients admitted to a rural state-level I trauma center was conducted. Injury severity measures such as abdominal AIS, ISS, and GCS were correlated with outcomes. Furthermore, the impact of maternal and gestational age on uterine compromise, uterine irritability, and the need for cesarean section intervention are presented. Twenty-one percent of patients were transferred from outside facilities with a median age of 29 years, average ISS of 3.9 ± 5.6, GCS of 13.8 ± 3.6, and abdominal AIS of 1.6 ± .8. Outcomes included maternal fatality of 2%, fetal demise of 4%, 6% experienced premature rupture of membranes, 9% experienced fetal placental compromise, 15% had uterine contractions, 15% of cesarean deliveries, and fetal decelerations occurred in 4%. Predictors of fetal compromise are strongly associated with high maternal ISS and low GCS. The frequency of traumatic injury in this unique population of patients is fortunately limited. The best predictor for fetal demise and uterine irritability is maternal injury severity, measured by ISS and GCS. Therefore, without severe maternal trauma, obstetrical trauma patients with minor injuries can safely be managed at non-tertiary care facilities with obstetrical capabilities.

Optimizing Trauma Systems: A Geospatial Analysis of the Victorian State Trauma System.

The aim of this study was to develop a data-driven approach to assessing the influence of trauma system parameters and optimizing the configuration of the Victorian State Trauma System (VSTS). Regionalized trauma systems have been shown to reduce the risk of mortality and improve patient function and health-related quality of life. However, major trauma case numbers are rapidly increasing and there is a need to evolve the configuration of trauma systems. A retrospective review of major trauma patients from 2016 to 2018 in Victoria, Australia. Drive times and flight times were calculated for transport to each of 138 trauma receiving hospitals. Changes to the configuration of the VSTS were modeled using a Mixed Integer Linear Programming algorithm across 156 simulations. There were 8327 patients included in the study, of which 58% were transported directly to a major trauma service (MTS). For adult patients, the proportion of patients transported directly to an MTS increased with higher transport time limit, greater probability of helicopter emergency medical service utilization, and lower hospital patient threshold numbers. The proportion of adult patients transported directly to an MTS varied from 66% to 90% across simulations. Across all simulations for pediatric patients, only 1 pediatric MTS was assigned. We have developed a robust and data-driven approach to optimizing trauma systems. Through the use of geospatial and mathematical models, we have modeled how potential future changes to trauma system characteristics may impact on the optimal configuration of the system, which will enable policy makers to make informed decisions about health service planning into the future.

A Novel Approach to Assessment of US Pediatric Trauma System Development

Mature trauma systems are critical in building and maintaining national, state, and local resilience against all-hazard disasters. Currently, pediatric state trauma system plans are not standardized and thus are without concrete measures of potential effectiveness. To develop objective measures of pediatric trauma system capability at the state level, hypothesizing significant variation in capabilities between states, and to provide a contemporary report on the status of national pediatric trauma system planning and development. A national survey was deployed in 2018 to perform a gap analysis of state pediatric trauma system capabilities. Four officials from each state were asked to complete the survey regarding extensive pediatric-related or specific trauma system parameters. Using these parameters, a panel of 14 individuals representing national stakeholder sectors in pediatric trauma care convened to identify the essential components of the ideal pediatric trauma system using Delphi methodology. Data analysis was conducted from March 16, 2019, to February 23, 2020. Based on results from the national survey and consensus panel parameters, each state was given a composite score. The score was validated using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) fatal injury database. The national survey had less than 10% missing data. The consensus panel reached agreement on 6 major domains of pediatric trauma systems (disaster, legislation/funding, access to care, injury prevention/recognition, quality improvement, pediatric readiness) and was used to develop the Pediatric Trauma System Assessment Score (PTSAS) based on 100 points. There was substantial variation across states, with state scores ranging from 48.5 to 100. Based on US CDC WONDER data, for every 1-point increase in PTSAS, there was a 0.12 per 100 000 decrease in mortality (95% CI, -0.22 to -0.02; P = .03). Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that a more robust pediatric trauma system has a significant association with pediatric injury mortality. This study assessed the national landscape of capability and preparedness to provide pediatric trauma care at the state level. These parameters can tailor the maturation of children's interests within a state trauma system and assist with future state, regional, and national planning.

Multi-disciplinary, simulation-based, standardised trauma team training within the Victorian State Trauma System.

Inconsistency in the structure and function of team-based major trauma reception and resuscitation is common. A standardised trauma team training programme was initiated to improve quality and consistency among trauma teams across a large, mature trauma system. The aim of this manuscript is to outline the programme and report on the initial perception of participants. The Alfred Trauma Team Reception and Resuscitation Training (TTRRT) programme commenced in March 2019. Participants included critical care and surgical craft group members commonly involved in trauma teams. Training was site-specific and included rural, urban and tertiary referral centres. The programme consisted of prescribed pre-learning, didactic lectures, skill stations and simulated team-based scenarios. Participant perceptions of the programme were collected before and after the programme for analysis. The TTRRT was delivered to 252 participants and 120 responses were received. Significant improvement in participant-reported confidence was identified across all key topic areas. There was also a significant increase in both confidence and clinical exposure to trauma team leadership roles after participation in the programme (from 53 [44.2%] to 74 [61.7%; P=0.007]). This finding was independent of clinician experience. A team-based trauma reception and resuscitation education programme, introduced in a large, mature trauma system led to positive participant-reported outcomes in clinical confidence and real-life team leadership participation. Wider implementation combined with longitudinal data collection will facilitate correlation with patient and staff-centred outcomes.

Change in outcomes for trauma patients over time: Two decades of a state trauma system

BackgroundTrauma center mortality rates are benchmarked to expected rates of death based on patient and injury characteristics. The expected mortality rate is recalculated from pooled outcomes across a trauma system each year, obscuring system-level change across years. We hypothesized that risk-adjusted mortality would decrease over time within a state-wide trauma system. MethodsWe identified adult trauma patients presenting to Level I and II Pennsylvania trauma centers, 1999–2018, using the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study. Multivariable logistic regression generated risk-adjusted models for mortality in all patients, and in key subgroups: penetrating torso injury, blunt multisystem trauma, and patients presenting in shock. ResultsOf 162,646 included patients, 123,518 (76.1%) were white and 108,936 (67.0%) were male. The median age was 49 (interquartile range [IQR] 29–70), median injury severity score was 16 (IQR 10–24), and 87.5% of injuries were blunt. Overall, 9.9% of patients died, and compared to 1999, no year had significantly higher adjusted odds of mortality. Overall mortality was significantly lower in 2007–2009 and 2011–2018. Of patients with blunt, multisystem injuries, 17.7% died, and adjusted mortality improved over time. Mortality rates were 24.9% for penetrating torso injury, and 56.9% for shock, with no significant change. Mortality improved for patients with ISS < 25, but not for the most severely injured. ConclusionsOver 20 years, Pennsylvania trauma centers demonstrated improved risk-adjusted mortality rates overall, but improvement remains lacking in high-risk groups despite numerous innovations and practice changes in this time period. Identifying change over time can help guide focus to these critical gaps.

Blood product availability in the Washington state trauma system.

Early transfusion can prolong life in injured patients awaiting definitive hemorrhage control. We conducted a community resources assessment of blood product availability at hospitals within the Washington State (WA) Regional Trauma System, with the expectation that a minority of Level IV and V centers would have blood products routinely available for use in resuscitation. We designed a questionnaire soliciting information on routinely available unit quantities of red blood cells (RBC), plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and/or whole blood and submitted this questionnaire electronically to the 82 WA designated trauma centers (Levels I-V). Non-responders were contacted directly by telephone. The study was conducted in September and October 2021. US 2020 census data were used to correlate results with local population densities. First-round contact netted responses from 57 (70%) centers; the remaining centers provided information via telephone, for a 100% final response. Packed RBC were available in 79 of the 82 centers (96%; range 6-220 units); plasma, 62 centers (76%, range 1-100 units); platelets, 40 centers (49%, range 1-8units); cryoprecipitate, 45 centers (55%, range 1-20 units). Whole blood was only available at the Level I center. Three Level V centers, located in 2 of the 8 WA state trauma regions, reported no routine blood availability. The two trauma regions affected represent 12% of the state's population and more than a third of its geographic area. Within the WA regional trauma system, blood products are wide, if unevenly, available. Large urban/rural disparities in availability exist that should be explored.

The Short and the Long of it: Timing of Mortality for Older Adults in a State Trauma System

BackgroundThe impact of injury extends beyond the hospital stay, but trauma center performance metrics typically focus on in-hospital mortality. We compared risk adjusted rates of in-hospital and long-term mortality among Pennsylvania trauma centers. We hypothesized that centers with low rates of in-hospital mortality would also have low rates of long-term mortality. MethodsWe identified injured patients (age ≥ 65) admitted to Pennsylvania trauma centers in 2013 and 2014 using the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study, a robust, state-wide trauma registry. We matched trauma registry records to Medicare claims from the y 2013 to 2015. Matching variables included admission date and patient demographics including date of birth, zip, sex, and race and/or ethnicity. Outcomes examined were inpatient, 30-day, and 1-y mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models including presenting physiology, comorbidities, injury characteristics, and demographics were developed to calculate expected mortality rates for each trauma center at each time point. Trauma center performance was assessed using observed-to-expected ratios and ranking for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-y mortality. ResultsOf the 15,451 patients treated at 28 centers, 8.1% died before discharge or were discharged to hospice. Another 3.4% died within 30 d, and another 14.7% died within 1 y of injury. Of patients who survived hospitalization but died within 30 d, 92.5% were injured due to fall, and 75.0% sustained head injuries. Survival at 1 y was higher in patients discharged home (88.4%), compared to those discharged to a skilled nursing facility or long-term acute care hospital (72.7% and 52.6%, respectively). Three centers were identified as outliers (two low and one high) for in-hospital mortality, none of which were outliers when the horizon was stretched to 30 d from injury. At 30 d, two different low and two different high outliers were found. ConclusionNearly one-in-three injured older adults who die within 30 d of injury dies after hospital discharge. Hospital rankings for in-hospital mortality correlate poorly with long-term outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of looking beyond survival to discharge for quality improvement and benchmarking.

The impact of COVID-19 infection on outcomes after injury in a state trauma system.

The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped the health care system in 2020. COVID-19 infection has been associated with poor outcomes after orthopedic surgery and elective, general surgery, but the impact of COVID-19 on outcomes after trauma is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to Pennsylvania trauma centers from March 21 to July 31, 2020. The exposure of interest was COVID-19 (COV+) and the primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and complications. We compared demographic and injury characteristics between positive, negative, and not-tested patients. We used multivariable regression with coarsened exact matching to estimate the impact of COV+ on outcomes. Of 15,550 included patients, 8,170 (52.5%) were tested for COVID-19 and 219 (2.7%) were positive (COV+). Compared with COVID-19-negative (COV-) patients, COV+ patients were similar in terms of age and sex, but were less often white (53.5% vs. 74.7%, p < 0.0001), and more often uninsured (10.1 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.002). Injury severity was similar, but firearm injuries accounted for 11.9% of COV+ patients versus 5.1% of COV- patients (p < 0.001). Unadjusted mortality for COV+ was double that of COV- patients (9.1% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.0001) and length of stay was longer (median, 5 vs. 4 days; p < 0.001). Using coarsened exact matching, COV+ patients had an increased risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 6.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.29-15.99), any complication (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.08-3.16), and pulmonary complications (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 2.02-16.54) compared with COV- patients. Patients with concomitant traumatic injury and COVID-19 infection have elevated risks of morbidity and mortality. Trauma centers must incorporate an understanding of these risks into patient and family counseling and resource allocation during this pandemic. Level II, Prognostic Study.

Trauma system funding: implications for the surgeon health policy advocate

BackgroundTrauma systems improve mortality for the most severely injured patients; however, these systems are managed by individual states with different funding mechanisms, which can lead to inconsistencies in the quality...

Cardiac complications and failure to rescue after injury in a mature state trauma system: Towards identifying opportunities for improvement

IntroductionCardiac complications (CC) after injury are rare but contribute disproportionately to mortality. Variability in rates of CC and failure to rescue (FTR) after CC (FTR-C) within trauma systems may suggest opportunities for improvement, but we have not yet demonstrated the ability to identify high and low performers. We examined center-level rates of CC and FTR-C in a mature trauma system with the hypothesis that high-performing centers for each of these outcomes could be identified. MethodsUsing a statewide trauma registry from 2007–2015, we developed multivariable logistic regression models on CC and FTR-C including patient demographics, physiology, comorbidity, and injury data. Predicted probabilities of each outcome were summed to generate expected event rates, which were compared to observed event rates to generate centerlevel observed-to-expected (O:E) ratios. We measured internal consistency between CC and FTR-C for centers using Cronbach's alpha. ResultsCardiac complications occurred in 5,079/278,042 (1.8%; center-level range: 0.9–3.8%) of included patients (median age 55 (IQR 34–76), 84% Caucasian, 60% male, 92% blunt, median ISS 9 (IQR5-16)). Death after CC occurred in 982/5,097 patients for an FTR-C rate of 19.3% (center-level range: 7.8–30.4%). 10/27 centers were high-performers (95% confidence interval for O:E ratio <1) for CC and 2/27 centers were high-performers for FTR-C, but internal consistency between these metrics was poor (alpha = 0.31). ConclusionRates of CC and FTR-C vary significantly between hospitals in mature trauma systems but high-performing centers can be identified. Inconsistent performance between metrics suggests unknown institutional factors underlie performance for CC and FTR.

241EMF Identifying Impacts of Undertriage Among Severe Pediatric Trauma Patients

The objective of this study was to detect factors associated with undertriage of pediatric trauma and establish the influence of undertriage on inter-facility transfer and mortality. This is a retrospective cohort study of all-payer administrative claims data of all emergency department (ED) and inpatient visits in a large, southeastern state between 2010 – 2015. Pediatric (<15 years) trauma patients were identified by ED diagnostic codes and restricted to severe injury using validated injury severity score (≥ 15). Undertriage was defined as initial care in a nontrauma (Level 3 or higher) center (pediatric or adult), as assigned by the state. Univariable and multivariable regression were used to identify risk factors for undertriage and the impact of undertriage on mortality and length of stay. Covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, expected primary payer, rurality, injury severity (ISS 15-25 or >25), admission timing (weekend versus weekday), and quartile of median household income (by zip code). Overall, 4,382 pediatric severe trauma subjects were included and 74.4% (n=3,260) were initially managed outside of an ED in a Level I or Level II trauma center. These subjects were more likely to be white, privately or non-insured, and reside in non-metro zip codes. Rural residence was the greatest risk factor for presenting at a nontrauma center (aOR: 4.10 [95% CI 2.62 to 6.43]). Eleven percent (n=482) of the subjects died during the initial hospital encounter, and initial assessment at a nontrauma center compared to trauma center was not associated with mortality (aOR: 0.81 [95% CI 0.60 to 1.09]). Length of stay, including ED and hospital stay, did not differ between subjects presenting to EDs at trauma or nontrauma centers (adjusted β: 1.05 [95% CI 0.96 to 1.15]). Additionally, 5.0% of subjects were transferred, but inter-hospital transfer was not associated with undertriage (aOR: 0.86 [95% CI 0.62 to 1.19]). Initial presentation at EDs that are not pediatric or adult trauma centers is common among severe pediatric trauma patients. Mortality, length of stay, and transfer patterns do not differ between trauma patients initially presenting to trauma versus nontrauma centers, even after adjusting for patient and facility characteristics. The high proportion of pediatric trauma patients seen outside of trauma centers is in line with previous reports in other state trauma systems. Absence of an observed impact of undertriage on mortality in this study may be due to differences in rural-urban disparities, a more mature trauma system and transfer protocols, or increased capability to manage trauma in nontrauma centers within the state. Future work will focus on incorporating emergency medical services availability and restricting the population to a more specific (ISS>25) definition of severe trauma.

Trauma system resource preservation: A simple scene triage tool can reduce helicopter emergency medical services overutilization in a state trauma system.

Helicopter emergency medical services improve survival in some injured patients but current utilization leads to significant overtriage with considerable numbers of transported patients discharged home from the emergency department or found to have non-time-sensitive injuries. Current triage models for utilization are complex and untested. Data from a state trauma registry were reviewed from 1987 to 1993 and from 2013 to 2015 and compared. Data from 2013 to 2015 were analyzed for field information found to influence mortality and a model for low mortality-risk patients designed. Indexed to population, a major increase in numbers of injured patients transported directly to designated trauma centers (39.849-167.626/100,000/year) occurred with an increased portion transported by helicopter emergency medical services from 7.28% to 9.26%. A simple triage tool to predict low mortality rates was designed utilizing results from logistic regression. Nongeriatric adult patients (age, 16.0-69.9 years) with a blunt injury mechanism, normal Glasgow Coma Scale motor score, pulse rate of 60 bpm to 120 bpm and respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute to 29 breaths per minute are at low risk for mortality. Cost for helicopter transportation was substantially higher than ground transportation based on available data. Cost differentials in transport mode increased patient financial risk when helicopter transportation was utilized. Implementing a simple decision tool designating nongeriatric adult patients with a blunt injury mechanism, normal Glasgow Coma Scale motor score, systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg, pulse rate of 60 bpm to 120 bpm, and respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute to 29 breaths per minute to ground transportation would result in substantial savings without an increase in mortality and reduce risk of patient financial harm. Prognostic/Epidemiological study, level IV. Economic and value based evaluation, level IV.

Developing a culture of quality, safety, and trust through continuous performance improvement within a state trauma system

Although significant deficits have been well documented in the performance of health care facilities, corrective actions to safeguard patients and optimize outcomes have not been as robust as expected. Traditionally evaluation of facilities’ performance has been limited to internal review and frequently in isolation due to perceived vulnerabilities. These activities have been reactionary to patient events that occur, rather than proactive system evaluation or identification of opportunities for prevention of future issues or obtaining care excellence. Comprehensive patient care evaluations are an area that an established Trauma System review process can drive improvement by sharing of success and pitfalls, to reduce repetitive undesired patient care outcomes and achieve equitable regional trauma care. Why should we continue to provide inadequate care, when other respected colleagues have found answers or a best practice resulting in desired results or improved outcomes? Are these perceived vulnerabilities real? Do they trump patient care outcomes? How can do we safely proceed to establish a safe, just culture of trust to accomplish our goal? The primary goal of benchmarking patient outcomes is more than a metric submission or dashboard. Ideally, it is the identification of high performers that share their strategies for improving patient care with low performing entities. This obtained knowledge can be analyzed, and appropriate components used to promote the best practice of the weaker performers for desired improved results. This strategy of openness will require significant shifts in attitude, teamwork, accountability and a high degree of trust in all of these areas. Ultimately, newer strategies founded on these principles will accelerate learning, knowledge and impact patient care safety. Pennsylvania has one of the most extended established trauma systems in the United States, this documents steps taken to develop a statewide collaborative network of just culture to benefit all injured.

Low major trauma confidence among emergency physicians working outside major trauma services: Inevitable result of a centralised trauma system or evidence for change?

Regionalised civilian trauma systems improve patient outcomes, but may deskill clinicians outside major trauma services (MTSs). We aimed to characterise experience and confidence in trauma management among emergency physicians working in MTS to those working elsewhere. Emergency physicians working within the Victorian State Trauma System were surveyed about their pre- and post-fellowship training experience, their estimated hours per fortnight in different centres, the frequency of performance/supervision of critical emergency skills and their confidence in a range of trauma skills. The 138 respondents analysed represented 33% of active Victorian FACEMs. The cohort were mostly males (69.6%), younger than 50 (75.4%) and were generally (69.6%) six or more years post-fellowship. FACEMs working in a MTS were more likely to have been a trauma registrar prior to fellowship (13.3% vs 3.7%, P = 0.046). MTS clinicians performed more, supervised more and were more confident in trauma team leading, traumatic airway management and rapid infusion catheter and multi-access catheters. Confidence in trauma team leading was only associated with exposure to performance or supervision of trauma team leading. Performance of trauma team leading was more common in clinicians at a MTS (odds ratio 3.19, 95% CI 1.00-10.20, P = 0.05). Exposure to major trauma is associated with time spent working in a MTS and exposure is associated with confidence. A mature inclusive trauma system must ensure clinicians across the system gain the experience or training to provide trauma care that will result in similar outcomes for patients regardless of initial presenting hospital.