ABSTRACT State takeovers of public-school districts are a controversial method to help fix struggling schools across the United States. This article considers the reasons behind takeovers, their effects on schools and communities, and both the positive and negative aspects of state involvement. We examine various state laws and specific examples from 3 Texas public school districts to understand how takeovers influence school performance, community participation, and district operations. Additionally, we consider the role of factors like socioeconomic conditions and political climate in determining the success of state interventions. Our goal is to contribute to the ongoing conversation about whether state takeovers are an effective solution for the complex challenges facing underperforming schools and school districts. To that end, we conclude by offering recommendations for future policy development and implementation.