Stapling Procedure Research Articles

Use of an intragastric trocar to perform a novel stapling procedure for reflux disease.

Background and study aims A percutaneous intragastric trocar (PIT) enables intraluminal use of laparoscopic tools and helps overcome traditional limitations of endoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of using a PIT to perform an anti-reflux stapling procedure. Materials and methods Trocars were placed in four animals and an articulating stapler was used to perform fundoplication under endoscopic guidance. Animals were monitored for 14 days post-procedure. Functional lumen imaging of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was performed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 14 days. Results The procedure was successful in all animals who survived to day 14 without distress or significant adverse events. Baseline EGJ distensibility was 5.0 ± 1.2 mm 2 /mmHg, 2.7 ± 0.7 mm 2 /mmHg post-procedurally, and 3.0 ± 0.8mm 2 /mmHg on day 14. Average change in distensibility pre- and post-procedure was -2.3 ± 1.8 mm 2 /mmHg (95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.5 to 5.1, P = 0.08) while change in pre- and day 14 distensibility was -2.0 ± 1.4 mm 2 /mmHg (95 % CI -0.1 to 4.2, P = 0.06). Conclusions An intragastric trocar allows for use of large-diameter laparoscopic instruments to safely and effectively perform endoluminal fundoplication with anti-reflux properties that persist for at least 14 days.

Design and performance evaluation of a powered stapler for gastrointestinal anastomosis

Objective This paper reports the design of a powered stapler for gastrointestinal anastomosis and evaluates its performance. The proposed stapling instrument is intended to simplify and optimize the current procedure of mechanical stapling, while providing controllable operation for the powered stapling procedure, such as conditioning the tissue to the right stage before firing of the stapler. Material and methods The feasibility and efficacy of the prototype were assessed by ex vivo experiments with porcine small intestine segments, where the tissue conditioning operation, burst pressure of the stapled intestine samples, and staple malformation rate were examined. Results The functionality of the developed powered stapler was validated, where the theoretical, numerical, and experimental results agree well with each other. The preliminary results indicated that the proposed tissue conditioning operation could lower the clamping pressure with a maximum level of 1.35 g/mm2. The average burst pressure of the stapled segments (16 samples) is 6.37 kPa, and the maximum malformation rate of the tested groups (five groups, each group with 90 staplers) was 5.56%. Conclusion The developed novel tissue conditioning procedure could reduce the pressure response of the intestine tissue samples. The proposed powered stapler proves effective for performing gastrointestinal anastomosis procedures.

Novel standardized stapling technique for soft pancreas in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a preliminary study

Introduction: The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains high after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP). To find the most appropriate stapling technique for the soft pancreas, we standardized a stapling procedure using a newly developed electric-powered stapler.

Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy using a robotic stapler in reduced-port totally robotic gastrectomy: its safety and efficiency compared with conventional anastomosis techniques

To investigate the safety and efficiency of using robotic staplers for intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy in reduced-port robotic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent totally robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy. Gastroduodenostomy using the ENDOWRIST robotic stapler (RR) was compared to that using an endolinear stapler during robotic gastrectomy (RE) and to that using an endolinear stapler during laparoscopic gastrectomy (LE). A total of 296 patients underwent gastroduodenostomy: 58, 28, and 210 patients with RR, RE, and LE, respectively. There were no conversions to other methods, and all robotic stapling procedures were performed on the console without receiving additional assistance from a bedside surgeon during RR. Comparing the operative outcomes of RR with those of RE and LE, respectively, we noted similar postoperative short-term outcomes. There were no major complications, including anastomosis-related complications, during the postoperative period after RR. The median reconstruction time during RR was 8 min and 45 s, which was similar to that during RE (8 min, 5 s [P > 0.9999]), but longer than that during LE (6 min, 30 s [P < 0.0001]). Intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy using the robotic stapler during robotic gastrectomy could be safely and feasibly performed on the console without the assistance of assistant, bedside surgeons.

How to prevent adverse events of vascular stapling in thoracic surgery: recommendations based on a clinical and experimental study.

Advances in the development of staplers for pulmonary vessels have contributed to safe and convenient procedures in thoracic surgery. However, adverse events (AEs) can occur during vascular stapling and cause fatal hemorrhage. We aimed to assess the risk level of using the vessel stapling procedure to reduce such AEs. First, an animal experiment using pig cardiopulmonary blocks was conducted. Pulmonary arteries were closed with staplers under stressful conditions such as lifting or twisting; vessel stump endurance was analyzed through different methods. Second, AEs associated with clinical stapler use for pulmonary vessels were retrospectively reviewed by studying clinical videos of 263 patients. In the animal experiment, the pressure resistance was significantly lower in the twisted group than in the no strain group (no strain vs. lifting: P=0.2008, no strain vs. twisting: P=0.002, no strain vs. twisting and lifting: P<0.0001). Regarding clinical stapler use, 754 staplers were used against the vessels. AEs occurred in 9 cases, and 7 cases were suspected to be caused by vessel tension. The pulmonary vessel stapling causes stress due to twisting and lifting that decreased stump durability. Avoiding such stress when using stapler for vessels leads to a safer thoracic surgery.

Is There a Better Design for a Bariatric Procedure? The Case for a Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch

The majority of bariatric surgical stapling procedure concepts were developed prior to the understanding of obesity as an energy storage disease. Conventional treatments did not consider the impact of macronutrients on hormones and glucose variability. Current recommendations suggest diets low in glycemic load, with moderate protein and unsaturated fat. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass promotes glucose variability which can be harmful for health and encourage weight regain. Classic duodenal switch with short common channels may prevent absorption of measurable fat-soluble vitamins and frequently untested essential fatty acids. The purpose of this review is to discuss these factors and explain why single anastomosis duodenal switch reduces glucose variability, allows for absorption of critical fats and fat-soluble vitamins, and has potential to offer better weight loss and metabolic outcomes.

30-Day Outcomes of Revisional Bariatric Stapling Procedures: First Report Based on MBSAQIP Data Registry.

The number of bariatric revisional cases has nearly doubled since 2011, and now comprises 13.6% of the total number of cases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes and safety of the two most common stapling revisional procedures, namely, sleeve and gastric bypass in comparison to primary stapling procedures using the MBSAQIP data registry. We reviewed all the sleeve and gastric bypass cases entered between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015, in the MBSAQIP data registry. We, then, identified sleeve and bypass patients who have had a previous bariatric procedure. Demographics and 30day outcomes of all sleeve and gastric bypass patients were analyzed. We conducted within group comparisons comparing primary sleeve gastrectomy (PS) and primary gastric bypass (PB) patients to revisional sleeve (RS) and revisional gastric bypass (RB) patients, respectively. We, then, conducted group comparisons comparing RS to RB patients. The total number of patients analyzed was 141,577 (98,292 or 69% sleeve patients and 43,285 or 31% gastric bypass patients). Among the sleeve patients, 92,666 (94%) had a PS and 5626 (6%) had RS. Among the bypass patients, 39,567 (91%) had a PB and 3718 patients (9%) had RB. 30-day readmission rate of RS was significantly higher as compared to PS (4.1 vs 0.4%, p < 0.05). The incidence of at least one complication requiring reoperation or reintervention within 30days following RS was twice as high as compared to PS (1.9 and 2% for RS vs 0.9 and 1.1% for PS respectively, p < 0.05). Length of stay and 30day mortality rates for PS and RS were the same. 30-day readmission rate of RB as compared to PB was 8.3 vs 6.3% (p < 0.05). Also, the incidence of at least one complication requiring reoperation or reintervention following RB was 3.9 and 4%, respectively vs 2.4 and 2.7% for PB (p < 0.05). In addition, readmission rates and unplanned admission rates to the ICU were significantly higher for RB compared to RS (8.3 and 2% for RB vs 4.1 and 0.9% for RS respectively, p < 0.05). The incidence of at least one reoperation or one intervention following RB were also significantly higher compared to RS (3.9 vs 1.9% and 4 vs 2% respectively, p < 0.05). Revisional stapling procedures are safe but the rates of complications following RS and RB are twice as high compared to PS and PB. Also, RB are more likely to develop complications compared to RS.

Development of a Single-Chain Peptide Agonist of the Relaxin-3 Receptor Using Hydrocarbon Stapling.

Structure-activity studies of the insulin superfamily member, relaxin-3, have shown that its G protein-coupled receptor (RXFP3) binding site is contained within its central B-chain α-helix and this helical structure is essential for receptor activation. We sought to develop a single B-chain mimetic that retained agonist activity. This was achieved by use of solid phase peptide synthesis together with on-resin ruthenium-catalyzed ring closure metathesis of a pair of judiciously placed i,i+4 α-methyl, α-alkenyl amino acids. The resulting hydrocarbon stapled peptide was shown by solution NMR spectroscopy to mimic the native helical conformation of relaxin-3 and to possess potent RXFP3 receptor binding and activation. Alternative stapling procedures were unsuccessful, highlighting the critical need to carefully consider both the peptide sequence and stapling methodology for optimal outcomes. Our result is the first successful minimization of an insulin-like peptide to a single-chain α-helical peptide agonist which will facilitate study of the function of relaxin-3.

Outcomes in Patients with Helicobacter pylori Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

In vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), the majority of the stomach is resected and much of the tissue colonized with Helicobacter pylori and the bulk of acid producing cells are removed. In addition, the effect of H. pylori colonization of the stomach of patients undergoing stapling procedures is unclear. As a result, the need for detection and treatment of H. pylori in patients undergoing VSG is unknown. Four hundred and eighty patients undergoing VSG are the subject of this study. Three surgeons at a single institution performed the procedures. The remnant stomach was sent to pathology and tested for the presence of H. pylori using immunohistochemistry. All patients were discharged on proton pump inhibitors. Of the 480 patients who underwent VSG, 52 were found to be H. pylori positive based on pathology. There was no statistically significant difference in age (p = 0.77), sex (p = 0.48), or BMI (p = 0.39) between the groups. There were 17 readmissions post-op. Five of these were in the H. pylori positive cohort. Six of these complications were classified as severe (anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal collection, or abscess), with two in the H. pylori positive cohort (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in the severe complication rates between the two groups (p = 0.67). There were no readmissions for gastric or duodenal ulceration or perforation. Our data suggests that there is no increase in early complications in patients with H. pylori undergoing VSG. If these findings are confirmed in a long-term follow-up, it would mean that preoperative H. pylori screening in patients scheduled for VSG is not necessary.

Assessing the performance characteristics and clinical forces in simulated shape memory bone staple surgical procedure: The significance of SMA material model

This work is focused on the detailed computer simulation of the key stages involved in a shape memory alloy (SMA) osteosynthesis bone stapling procedure. To this end, a recently developed three-dimensional constitutive SMA material model was characterized from test data of three simple uniaxial-isothermal-tension experiments for powder metallurgically processed nickel-rich NiTi (PM/NiTi-P) material. The calibrated model was subsequently used under the complex, thermomechanical loading conditions involved in the surgical procedure using the body-temperature-activated PM/NiTi-P bone staple. Our aim here is to assess the immediate and post-surgical performance characteristics of the stapling operation using the material model. From this study: (1) it was found that adequate compressive forces were developed by the PM/NiTi-P bone staple, with the tendency of this force to even increase under sustained thermal loading due to the intrinsic “inverse relaxation phenomena” in the SMA material, (2) the simulation results correlated well with those from experimental measurements, (3) the body-temperature-activated PM/NiTi-P staple was proved to be clinically viable, providing a stable clamping force needed for speedy coaptation of the fractured bones, and (4) these realistic assessments crucially depend on the use of suitable and comprehensive SMA material models.

Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study.

The stapling technique was recommended in a recent Cochrane analysis based on relatively small randomized trials between 1970 and 2009. Data from a large Swedish population-based quality register were analyzed in order to compare the leakage frequency between stapled and hand-sewn ileocolic anastomoses in colon cancer surgery. Three-thousand four-hundred and twenty-eight patients with an ileocolic anastomosis were entered in a Swedish regional quality register for colon cancer, including the type of anastomosis used. The patients were analyzed by logistic regression regarding risk for leakage, and Cox proportional hazard regression for survival associated with the technique used for anastomosis. Analyses were made for gender, age, elective or emergency surgery, duration of surgery, bleeding, cancer stage, and local radicality. Most anastomoses were hand sewn (1,908 of 3,428, 55.7 %, p < 0.001), whereas stapling was more common among emergency cases (342 of 618, 55.3 %, p < 0.001). Clinically relevant leakage appeared in 58 patients (1.7 %), of whom 51 (87.9 %) were re-operated. Leakage was found to be more frequent after stapled anastomosis (2.4 vs. 1.2 %, p = 0.006), and in multivariate analysis, stapled anastomosis was the only risk factor (OR = 2.04 95 % CI 1.19-3.50). There was no difference in overall survival related to the technique. Hand-sewn anastomosis is not associated with a higher leakage rate when comparing to a stapling procedure and is recommended for routine and emergency right-sided colon cancer surgery. This recommendation is based on what appears to be a lower leakage rate, similar survival and lower material cost.

Changes in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein Levels after Laparoscopic Gastric Stapling Procedures versus Laparoscopic Gastric Banding

Obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia are risk factors for the development of coronary artery disease. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker that has been shown to be an independent predictor for cardiovascular risk. The aim of the current study was to examine the changes in cardiovascular risk profile in morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric stapling procedures (bypass and sleeve) compared with laparoscopic gastric banding. Levels of hs-CRP were measured preoperatively and at 12 to 24 months postoperatively. Based on hs-CRP levels, cardiovascular risk was categorized as low (less than 1 mg/L), moderate (1 to 3 mg/L), or high (greater than 3 mg/L). A total of 52 patients underwent gastric stapling procedures and 49 underwent gastric banding and both had preoperative and postoperative hs-CRP levels measured. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or preoperative body mass index (BMI) between groups. At baseline, 48.0 per cent of patients undergoing gastric stapling and 38.8 per cent of patients undergoing gastric banding had moderate or high cardiovascular risk. BMI at 24 months was significantly lower in the gastric stapling compared with the gastric banding group (30.4 ± 5.4 vs 36.1 ± 5.5 kg/m(2), respectively, P < 0.01). Of the patients with elevated cardiovascular risk, 64.0 per cent of gastric stapling versus 57.8 per cent of gastric banding patients had a reduction in risk category at 12 to 24 months follow-up, whereas 1.9 per cent of patients undergoing gastric stapling versus 4.1 per cent of patients undergoing gastric banding had an increase in risk category. The mean reduction in hs-CRP level for patients with elevated cardiovascular risk was greater for gastric stapling compared with gastric banding procedures (-1.10 ± 0.94 mg/L vs -0.67 ± 0.82 mg/L, respectively, P < 0.05). Cardiovascular risk improved in the majority of patients after bariatric surgery, but a more pronounced improvement occurred in patients who underwent gastric stapling procedures.

Endoscopic gastric volume reduction with a novel articulating plication device is safe and effective in the treatment of obesity (with video)

Endoscopic volume reduction of the stomach may provide a minimally invasive alternative for surgical procedures in the treatment of obesity. To assess safety and preliminary effectiveness in the first human application of a novel endoscopic stapling technique. Prospective, observational, phase 1 study. Two university hospitals in The Netherlands. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 to 45 kg/m(2) or 30 to 39.9 kg/m(2) with obesity-related comorbidity. Gastric volume reduction with an endoscopic stapler. Primary outcome measure was the prevalence of serious or mild adverse events. Reduction of excess body weight after 12 months was assessed as a secondary outcome measure for effectiveness of the procedure. Seventeen patients with a median BMI of 40.2 kg/m(2) (interquartile range [IQR] 37.6-42.8) underwent an endoscopic stapling procedure. Median procedure time was 123 minutes (IQR 95-129). No serious adverse events occurred. Adverse events were gastric pain (n= 7, range 1-3 days), sore throat (n= 4, 2-3 days), diarrhea (n= 4, 2-15 days), nausea (n= 3, 2-4 days), constipation (n= 4, 3-14 days), and vomiting (n= 3, 1-4 days). All adverse events were mild and resolved with conservative treatment within 15 days after surgery. The median percentage excess weight loss in the first year was 34.9% (IQR 17.8-46.6). Limited number of patients. This first human application of this endoscopic stapler demonstrates that the procedure is technically feasible and safe. One hundred sixty plications were created in 17 patients without significant problems. Weight loss after 1 year is promising, but long-term follow-up and randomized, controlled studies should evaluate whether this procedure is an effective and durable minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for obesity. ( NCT01429194.).

Profiling Hospitals on Bariatric Surgery Quality: Which Outcomes Are Most Reliable?

Under the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program, hospitals will receive risk-adjusted outcomes feedback for peer comparisons and benchmarking. It remains uncertain whether bariatric outcomes have adequate reliability to identify outlying performance, especially for hospitals with low caseloads that will be included in the program. We explored the ability of risk-adjusted outcomes to identify outlying hospital performance with bariatric surgery for a range of hospital caseloads. We used the 2010 State Inpatient Databases for 12 states (N = 31,240 patients) to assess different outcomes (eg, complications, reoperation, and mortality) after bariatric stapling procedures. We first quantified outcomes reliability on a 0 (no reliability) to 1 (perfect reliability) scale. We then assessed whether risk- and reliability-adjusted outcomes could identify outlying performance among hospitals with different annual caseloads. Overall and serious complications had the highest overall reliability, but this was heavily dependent on caseload. For example, among hospitals with the lowest caseloads (mean 56 cases/year), reliability for overall complications was 0.49 and 6.0% of hospitals had outlying performance. For hospitals with the highest caseloads (mean 298 cases/year), reliability for overall complications was 0.79 and 30.3% of hospitals had outlying performance. Reoperation had adequate reliability for hospitals with caseloads higher than 120 cases/year. Mortality had unacceptably low reliability regardless of hospital caseloads. Overall complications and serious complications have adequate reliability for distinguishing outlying performance with bariatric surgery, even for hospitals with low annual caseloads. Rare outcomes, such as reoperations, have inadequate reliability to inform peer-based comparisons for hospitals with low annual caseloads, and mortality has unacceptably low reliability for bariatric performance profiling.

Laparoscopic Gastric Stapling Procedures as a Replacement to Gastric Banding in the 21st Century?

Laparoscopic Gastric Stapling Procedures as a Replacement to Gastric Banding in the 21st Century?

Single Port Trans-gastric Reversal of High Gastric Reduction

Stomal stenosis is common following high gastric reduction or vertical banded gastroplasty for obesity. Open and laparoscopic approaches for reversal can be problematic due to expected adhesions from previous surgery. A technical description of a novel approach for reversal of stomal stenosis following high gastric reduction is provided. This minimally invasive technique combines both "trans-gastric" and "endoscopic" principles for intraluminal reversal via a single port site incision. We describe our early experience in eight cases with this technique, highlighting its advantages and discussing potential pitfalls to be avoided to maximise its use and efficiency. It appears to be simple, safe and widely applicable. The single port trans-gastric, laparo-endoscopic technique provides a simple and effective minimally invasive method of reversing gastric stapling procedures without the need for extensive adhesiolysis.

Volume and outcome relationship in bariatric surgery in the laparoscopic era

The relationship between volume and outcomes in bariatric surgery is well established in the literature. However, the analyses were performed primarily in the open surgery era and in the absence of national accreditation. The recent Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program proposed an annual threshold volume of 50 stapling cases. This study aimed to examine the effect of volume and accreditation on surgical outcomes for bariatric surgery in this laparoscopic era. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used for analysis of the outcomes experienced by morbidly obese patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic stapling bariatric surgical procedure between 2006 and 2010. In this analysis, low-volume centers (LVC < 50 stapling cases/year) were compared with high-volume centers (HVC ≥ 50 stapling cases/year). Multivariate analysis was performed to examine risk-adjusted serious morbidity and in-hospital mortality between the LVCs and HVCs. Additionally, within the HVC group, risk-adjusted outcomes of accredited versus nonaccredited centers were examined. Between 2006 and 2010, 277,760 laparoscopic stapling bariatric procedures were performed, with 85% of the cases managed at HVCs. The mean number of laparoscopic stapling cases managed per year was 17 ± 14 at LVCs and 144 ± 117 at HVCs. The in-hospital mortality was higher at LVCs (0.17%) than at HVCs (0.07%). Multivariate analysis showed that laparoscopic stapling procedures performed at LVCs had higher rates of mortality than those performed at HVCs [odds ratio (OR) 2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.8; p < 0.01] as well as higher rates of serious morbidity (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.4; p < 0.01). The in-hospital mortality rate at nonaccredited HVCs was 0.22% compared with 0.06% at accredited HVCs. Multivariate analysis showed that nonaccredited centers had higher rates of mortality than accredited centers (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.5-8.3; p < 0.01) but lower rates of serious morbidity (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.7-0.9; p < 0.01). In this era of laparoscopy, hospitals managing more than 50 laparoscopic stapling cases per year have improved outcomes. However, nonaccredited HVCs have outcomes similar to those of LVCs. Therefore, the impact of accreditation on outcomes may be greater than that of volume.

Impact of prolapse mass on Contour® Transtar™ technique for third-degree rectal prolapse

Contour Transtar procedure for rectal prolapse is a promising technique according to safety and efficacy. One potential surgical problem is failure of the stapler due to the thick rectal wall. In order to evaluate the practicability and the impending limitations of the Contour Transtar technique, we reviewed our data with special respect to the necessity of additional anastomosis suturing. A prospective analysis of 25 consecutive patients, which underwent Contour Transtar procedure from January 2009 to July 2012, was performed. For statistic analysis, the groups with and without additional suturing of the anastomosis were evaluated according to patient characteristics and surgical outcome. Twenty-five patients, three men and 22 women, underwent transanal Contour Transtar stapling procedure for rectal prolapse. Due to stapling failure, additional suturing of the anastomosis was necessary in 4 of 25 procedures (16%). Age (74.1 vs. 83.1 years) and body mass index (30.8 vs. 22.7 kg/m(2)) were significantly different with and without additional suturing. Operative time was longer (62 vs. 31 min), more cartridges were used (12 vs. 6), and the specimen weight was higher (220 vs. 107 g) in patients with additional suturing. Early postoperative complications were observed in two patients without anastomosis suturing including one patient with bleeding and systemic inflammatory reaction in one case. Postoperative stay did not differ between both groups. Patients with extensive obesity, which present with a substantial rectal prolapse, may need additional suturing of the rectal anastomosis after Contour Transtar stapling. This causes prolonged operative time. However, this does not correlate with complications and it is not related to significant longer hospital stay.

Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele

While the majority of patients after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) have an uneventful recovery, there is a minority who will experience chronic complications, such as inflammation, chronic pain and defecatory disorders. The same is also true for stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) carried out for obstructed defecation. Some of these complications are believed to occur because of retained staples. The merit of the review by Petersen et al. [1] is that the authors recall the attention of the surgical community to the problem of retained staples following PPH and STARR. Interestingly, a recent study reported that most surgeons who performed PPH informed their patients that staples would be shed within 3 weeks to 3 months after surgery. Instead, all patients in this study who had a plain x-ray 1 week to 5 years after surgery were shown to have retained staples [2]. In another study, 20% of reinterventions carried out following PPH were performed due to symptomatic retained staples [3]. What are the symptoms caused by retention of staples? Chronic bleeding, rectal stricture and penile trauma during sexual intercourse may be related to retained staples and require staple removal, with clinical relief of symptoms. But the aforementioned complications are relatively rare following PPH and STARR. Instead, postoperative painful defecation is more frequent, ranging between 2 and 20% [4]. Unfortunately, pain is likely to affect the quality of life in these patients. Therefore, the crucial question is: Is agraffectomy indicated to relieve severe chronic pain after PPH and STARR? Despite encouraging occasional reports [5], the current review concludes that there is not enough evidence to justify agraffectomy when aimed at relieving chronic postoperative pain. This conclusion is mainly based on the paucity of data and the lack of a homogeneous patient population. The first problem that the authors encountered is in the definition of agraffectomy that includes disparate procedures, from the removal of single staples through a proctoscope to the most radical which is the removal of the entire anastomotic ring with all the associated fibrosis followed by manual anastomosis between healthy tissues. Moreover, pain after transanal stapled procedures may be multifactorial and secondary not only to inflammation and fibrosis but also to underlying functional and psychological disorders often ignored in the evaluation of these patients. The authors quote a theory postulated by Cheetham et al. [6] who attributed chronic pain after PPH to fibrosis causing chronic stimulation of the somatic sensory nerves of the levator ani muscles. Whether the central or peripheral somatic or visceral component is prevalent in the etiology of chronic postoperative proctalgia is still unknown. As the authors conclude, prospective studies are needed in which patients undergo thorough preand postoperative evaluation. Until then, the benefits of this procedure will remain uncertain, and it will remain indicated as a ‘‘last alternative.’’ Meanwhile, caution is required in using a transanal stapling procedure when dealing with hemorrhoids and obstructed defecation, which may be managed with alternative conservative and surgical measures without the risk of retained staples. M. Pescatori (&) Rome, Italy e-mail: ucpclub@virgilio.it

Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele

Various sequelae which might lead to reintervention have been described after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. One potential treatment modality for persistent complaints after stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SHP) or stapling for rectocele is the so-called agraffectomy (removal of the retained staples). This treatment option means a further procedure that can range from removal of the staples through the anoscope to removal of the entire staple line with the associated scar tissue. In order to review the published literature, we conducted a search on Medline, Pubmed, and Embase using different terms for "agraffectomy." Overall, fourteen reports were found, dealing with agraffectomy for various conditions after low rectal stapling for hemorrhoids or rectocele. Agraffectomy is a rarely mentioned treatment option for conditions after SHP. In rectal stenosis with complete occlusion of the rectal lumen, the removal of the stenotic anastomosis and remaining staples seems to be reasonable. The same can be said of the removal of retained staples for rectal bleeding or in order to avoid penile injuries in anal intercourse. In contrast, the collected published reports on agraffectomy in this review only provide low-level evidence that this procedure provides relief for other problems such as incontinence or chronic pain. There is no clear evidence that agraffectomy is indicated if not in case of rectal stenosis and hemorrhage caused by the staples.