Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection Procedure Research Articles

Surgical Treatment for Rectocele by Posterior Colporrhaphy Compared to Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection.

Rectocele is defined as a defect in the rectovaginal septum, causing symptoms like obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), vaginal bulging, etc. Once the rectocele is larger than 3 cm and/or symptomatic, surgery should be considered. The surgical approach can be either transvaginal, transanal or transperineal. Two of the most common procedures in treating rectocele are posterior colporrhaphy (PC) and stapled trans anal rectal resection (STARR). The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of both procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study. Included were patients of the age of 18-85 years that underwent either STARR (n = 49 patients) or PC (n = 24 patients) procedures after a full clinical (defecography and physical exam before and after the surgery) and physiologic (a detailed questionnaire before and after the surgery) surveys. Symptoms of ODS before and after surgery were evaluated by questioners. Preoperatively, the patients in the STARR group had significantly higher rates of ODS: straining (90.9% vs. 65.2%), incomplete evacuation (100% vs. 69.6%), hard stool (57.8% vs. 43.5%), sense of obstruction (76.1% vs. 56.5%), and use of digitation (64.4% vs. 47.8%), or laxatives (70% vs. 47.8%), p < 0.001. Anatomically, the mean rectocele size was smaller for the STARR group, compared to the PC group (3.8 ± 1.4 vs. 5.3 ± 2.2 cm, respectively, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, in the STARR group, higher rates of patients complained about straining (36.4% vs. 21.7%, p < 0.001) and use of digitation (64.4% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), whereas lower rates of patients complained about incomplete evacuation (41.2% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.05) and sense of obstruction (17.6%, vs. 34.8%, p = 0.03), compared to the PC group. Among patients who underwent the STARR procedure, a decrease in rates of all symptoms was noted (straining 54.5%, incomplete evacuation 58.8%, hard stool 29.2%, sense of obstruction 58.5%, use of digitation 0.1%, and use of laxatives 31.5%). Both procedures are effective in reducing rectocele size (STARR- 1.9 ± 1 cm, PC- 3.1 ± 1). Both STARR and PC are effective in treating rectocele. It seems that the STARR procedure is superior to the PC procedure in treating symptoms of ODS.

Outcomes of a modified Bresler procedure for the treatment of rectocele with rectal intussusception.

BackgroundObstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a condition that is frequently caused by rectocele and rectal intussusception. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified Bresler procedure for the treatment of ODS. The outcomes of this modified procedure were compared with the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data from 76 female patients who presented with ODS between June 2014 and June 2016. The patients were divided into two treatment groups, namely Modified and STARR. Patients in the Modified group (n = 36) underwent the modified Bresler procedure, which involved posterior rectal-wall resection using a circular tubular stapler with multilevel purse-string sutures. Patients in the STARR group (n = 40) underwent the standard STARR procedure. We analysed post-operative complications, Wexner constipation scores (WCS), rectocele depths, and four-point post-operative satisfaction scales.ResultsPatients in the Modified group exhibited shorter operative times and fewer post-operative complications (both P < 0.05). At 12 months post-operatively, both the Modified and STARR groups displayed a significant improvement in the Wexner constipation score and the depth of rectocele. The post-operative WCS for the Modified group were significantly improved compared to those for the STARR group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the rectocele depth between the two groups (P > 0.05). Post-operative interviews at post-operative 12 months showed that patients in the Modified group had a better satisfaction (P = 0.05).ConclusionsOur modified procedure may be an effective treatment strategy for patients experiencing ODS caused by rectocele and rectal intussusception, with fewer complications and effective relief of symptoms.

Modified Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection Procedure for Limited Rectal Prolapse: A Viable Alternative to the Delorme Operation.

Purpose. The optimal surgical approach for full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP) remains controversial. In China, patients with limited FTRP (<5cm in length) are usually managed by perineal surgery. We retrospectively assessed the outcome of Delorme's procedure and compared it with modified stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Methods. The study was conducted in 2 public tertiary referral centers in China with modified STARR or Delorme's procedure performed by experienced surgeons. Outcomes assessed recurrence, operative times, blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, and continence and constipation scoring. Results. Between December 2012 and May 2019, 65 patients were assessed, including 48 with modified STARR (group 1) and 17 with Delorme's procedure (group 2). The median follow-up was 22months (range, 3-86months). The mean operative time for group 1 was 37.4 ± 17.5minutes vs 74.3 ± 30.6minutes for group 2 (P < .001). The blood loss for group 1 was significantly lower than that for group 2 (17.4 ± 15.9mL vs 27.8 ± 16.7mL, respectively; P = .028). There was no significant difference between groups in recurrence (group 1 18.8% vs group 2 23.5%; P = .944) with no effect of operation type. Both procedures showed improvement in constipation and continence scoring with a similar impact. Conclusions. Modified STARR and the Delorme operation are comparable in managing limited FTRP with superior results in operative time and blood loss for STARR.

Comparison of pre and post-operative ODS (Obstructed Defecation Syndrome) score in patient with ODS undergoing Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR)

Background: There are a variety of surgical approaches for correction of ODS, most of these have high recurrence and complication rates. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) was introduced in 2003 by Antonio Longo as a minimally invasive transanal operation for ODS associated with rectocele and or rectal intussusception.&#x0D; Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) as a surgical treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome(ODS).&#x0D; Methodology: This is a quasi experimental study that was carried out at Colorectal surgery unit of surgery department in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University. The sample size was 17. The admitted patient of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome with Rectocele and or Rectal intussusception was selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patient was evaluated by history, clinical examination, proctoscopy, colonoscopy and defecography. Preoperative Longo’s ODS score was determined for each patient and it was compared with postoperative ODS score. Regular follow up was done for each patient at one, three and six months after each operation.&#x0D; Results: Significant improvement of ODS score was observed in 82.35% patients. Only 02 (11.8%) patients didn’t respond to STARR procedure and their postoperative score was 13-15 may be due to coexistence of pelvic floor dysynergy. Postoperative defecatory urgency developed only in 02(11.76%) patients. No patient developed significant postoperative complication like hemorrhage or rectovaginal fistula.&#x0D; Conclusion: STARR is a simple, less invasive and effective procedure for the treatment of ODS due to rectocele and/or rectal intussusception without major morbidity but pelvic floor dyssynergy should be excluded preoperatively because it’s presence makes the surgical intervention fruitless.&#x0D; Journal of Surgical Sciences (2019) Vol. 23(2): 67-70

Assessment of anal sphincter distensibility following the STARR procedure: a pilot study

Aim: The STARR (Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection) procedure consists of a surgical correction of symptomatic rectocele refractory to medical treatment, involving anal dilatation. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the STARR procedure on anal distensibility using EndoFLIP® device.Methods: All female patients with a minimal rectocele of 3 cm and with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) refractory to medical treatment were included prospectively. Patients with previous anal incontinence were not included. Wexner, ODS and Kess scores were recorded. Endoanal ultrasounds and EndoFLIP® measurements were performed pre-surgery and 3 months following the STARR procedure. The distensibility index (DI) at 40 mL of inflation at rest was the primary study endpoint.Results: Seven patients (median age: 52.5, range: 44–62) were included between 2014 and 2017. The DI after surgery was the same as the pre-surgery DI. No patient developed symptoms of faecal incontinence or urge to defecate in the three months following the STARR procedure. All patients reported an improvement in their ODS and Kess scores three months after the STARR procedure. No anal sphincter defects were detected by endoanal ultrasound.Conclusion: Anal dilatation did not appear to alter anal distensibility in patients with a normal anal function before the STARR procedure.

Khubchandani's procedure combined with stapled posterior rectal wall resection for rectocele.

BACKGROUNDObstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a widespread disease in the world. Rectocele is the most common cause of ODS in females. Multiple procedures have been performed to treat rectocele and no procedure has been accepted as the gold-standard procedure. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has been widely used. However, there are still some disadvantages in this procedure and its effectiveness in anterior wall repair is doubtful. Therefore, new procedures are expected to further improve the treatment of rectocele.AIMTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel rectocele repair combining Khubchandani’s procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection.METHODSA cohort of 93 patients were recruited in our randomized clinical trial and were divided into two different groups in a randomized manner. Forty-two patients (group A) underwent Khubchandani’s procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection and 51 patients (group B) underwent the STARR procedure. Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo after the operation. Preoperative and postoperative ODS scores and depth of rectocele, postoperative complications, blood loss, and hospital stay of each patient were documented. All data were analyzed statistically to evaluate the efficiency and safety of our procedure.RESULTSIn group A, 42 patients underwent Khubchandani’s procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection and 34 were followed until the final analysis. In group B, 51 patients underwent the STARR procedure and 37 were followed until the final analysis. Mean operative duration was 41.47 ± 6.43 min (group A) vs 39.24 ± 6.53 min (group B). Mean hospital stay was 3.15 ± 0.70 d (group A) vs 3.14 ± 0.54 d (group B). Mean blood loss was 10.91 ± 2.52 mL (group A) vs 10.14 ± 1.86 mL (group B). Mean ODS score in group A declined from 16.50 ± 2.06 before operation to 5.06 ± 1.07 one year after the operation, whereas in group B it was 17.11 ± 2.57 before operation and 6.03 ± 2.63 one year after the operation. Mean depth of rectocele decreased from 4.32 ± 0.96 cm (group A) vs 4.18 ± 0.95 cm (group B) preoperatively to 1.19 ± 0.43 cm (group A) vs 1.54 ± 0.82 cm (group B) one year after operation. No other serious complications, such as rectovaginal fistula, perianal sepsis, or deaths, were recorded. After 12 mo of follow-up, 30 patients’ (30/34, 88.2%) final outcomes were judged as effective and 4 (4/34, 11.8%) as moderate in group A, whereas in group B, 30 (30/37, 81.1%) patients’ outcomes were judged as effective, 5 (5/37, 13.5%) as moderate, and 2 (2/37, 5.4%) as poor.CONCLUSIONKhubchandani’s procedure combined with stapled posterior rectal wall resection is an effective, feasible, and safe procedure with minor trauma to rectocele.

Value and limits of stapled transanal rectal repair for obstructed defecation syndrome: 10 years-experience with 450 cases

In the late's 90' a new surgical treatment, the stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) was born to treat obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). In this study we retrospectively analyze a series of 450 cases that underwent STARR in 10 years. Between January 2001 to December 2011, 450 patients, diagnosed with ODS syndrome caused by rectocele or intussusception, underwent to STARR procedure. The presence of rectocele and/or intussusception was verified by dynamic defecography. The preoperative evaluation was completed with anorectal manometry and colonoscopy. Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 1 years, 3 years and 5 years after surgery. Mean operative time was 30,2 min. In 408 cases (90.7%) hospital discharge occurred 24 hours after surgery. Among postoperative complications urinary retention was observed in 35 patients (7.8%). Five (1.1%) patients presented an early rectal bleeding and 8 (1.8%) patients presented a late bleeding. In 5 (1.1%) patients a stable pelvic hematoma was found. Six (1.3%) patients presented pelvic sepsis due to subperitoneal perforation. An asymptomatic partial dehiscence of stapler row occurred in 19 patients (4.2%).125 patients (27.8%) reported defecation urgency that completely vanished at 3 months follow-up in 83 patients (66,4%) and in further 42 patients (33,6%) at 6-months. The average preoperative ODS score was 14.1; 3.1 at one year; 4.3 at 3 years and 6.4 after five years. In expert hands, with right indications, STARR procedure is safe with good results in terms of improvement of the ODS score.

Indications, technique and results of the STARR procedure

Rectal intussusception and ventral rectocele are frequent morphological findings in patients suffering from obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). After failed conservative treatment asurgical option can be discussed. Surgical approaches include the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure, which is performed as atransanal approach by using two circular (PPH01) staplers for ventral and dorsal full-thickness resection of the distal rectum. Both retrospective and prospective studies as well as data from the German STARR registry demonstrated that the STARR procedure is safe and effective for symptom improvement and resolution in ODS associated with rectal intussusception in the short-term; however, disappointing functional results, particularly related to fecal incontinence and urgency, severe complications and high rates of revision surgery have also been documented. In general, based on the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in ODS related to rectal intussusception, patient selection for STARR seems to be the key for success; therefore, this review summarizes and evaluates the indications, surgical technique, results, controversies and current trends of the "conventional" STARR procedure using two circular (PPH01) staplers.

Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR) for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome—Functional Outcome and Quality of Life after Two Years

Background: Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has been shown to improve patients’ functional and quality of life outcomes in several studies. Although it is a safe and effective treatment for obstructive defecation syndrome, still data on long-term follow-up are missing. Methods: From January 2010 to July 2014, 46 consecutive patients undergoing STARR using the CONTOUR&reg TRANSTAR&#8482 device, shortly named TRANSTAR (transanal stapler assisted resection), were prospectively followed. Recurrence rate, quality of life (Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-Qol)) and complication were documented at baseline, 12 and 24 months after operation. Two subgroups of patients were compared to assess the impact of resection length on outcome. Results: We included 46 patients (89% female) in the study. The mean age was 65 ± 16 years and the duration of the operation was 48 ± 4 min. Total PAC-QoL score improved from 2.0 (SD 0.3) to 0.9 (1.4) after 12 months, but deteriorated to 1.2 (0.3) after 24 months (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Complications were noted in 7% of the patients: Urinary retention (2 patients), postoperative bleeding (1 patient). No major complications or mortality were seen. After one year, we had one prolapse recurrence and after 24 month we had another. There was no significant relation between the length of the specimen and the improvement of life quality. Conclusions: The STARR procedure seems to be a safe and fast therapeutic option for patients with ODS and/or rectal prolapse. It is a tailored transanal full-thickness rectal resection improving the patients’ quality of life still two years after the operation.

Reaching a Consensus for the Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection Procedure.

Reaching a Consensus for the Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection Procedure.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with recto-anal intussusception and rectocele: A valid alternative to STARR procedure in patients with anal sphincter weakness

This study was designed to assess the safety and outcomes achieved with Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR) vs laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) in obstructed defecation patients. From 2002 to 2011, 52 patients (females) had a rectocele with outlet obstruction. After clinical assessment by an Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score (ODS), an anorectal manometry, a defecography and an endoanal ultrasound, the patients underwent either a STARR (n=25) or a LVR (n=27) according to the existence of an asymptomatic anal sphincter injury. Functional results were evaluated clinically and by the preoperative and 18 months postoperative ODS score and by an 18 months postoperative score of satisfaction. Average ages were 56 ± 10 years in the STARR and 60 ± 9 years in LVR. The 1-month postoperative complication rates were comparable for the 2 groups (25%). Mean length of stay was shorter for STARR than for LVR (5.6 ± 2.1 vs. 7.1 ± 2.9, P=0.009). After treatment, the ODS was lowered by 56% in LVR and 59% in the STARR (P=0.0001) but with no difference between the 2 groups. Eighty percent of patients were very or moderately satisfied after LVR, versus 84% after STARR. The 2 surgical procedures obtain good results with 80% of satisfied patients with a length of stay a little shorter in the STARR. In our retrospective study, Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR) and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy improved the outlet obstruction associated with recto-anal intussusception and rectocele.

Short-term results after STARR versus internal Delorme for obstructed defecation: a non-randomized prospective study

Obstructed defecation syndrome due to internal intussusception and rectocele is a common disease, and various transanal surgical techniques have been proposed. Aim of the present study was to compare the internal Delorme (ID) and the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) results in the treatment of patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. From September 2011 to May 2012, 23 patients were operated with STARR procedure and 12 patients with Delorme's procedure for obstructed defecation syndrome. All patients underwent preoperative assessment: clinical evaluation (Altomare ODS score, Wexner constipation scoring system), proctoscopy, defecography, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography. Surgery was proposed with: failure of medical therapy, incomplete defecation, and unsuccessful attempts with long periods spent in bathroom, defecation with digital assistance, use of enemas and defecography findings of rectoanal intussusception and rectocele. The average operative time was 28 min (range 15-65) for the STARR group and 56 min (range 28-96) for the ID group with a mean hospital stay of 2 days for both the procedures. The Wexner score significantly fell postoperatively from 17 to 4, 7 in STARR group and from 15.3 to 3.3 in the ID group. The Altomare score postoperatively fell from 18.2 to 5.5 for STARR group and from 16.5 to 5.3 for ID group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two procedures considering the outcomes parameters and the complications. Both ID and STARR procedure seem to be effective in the treatment of ODS.

Role of 0.4 % glyceryl trinitrate ointment after stapled trans-anal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: a prospective, randomized trial

The anal fissure and spasm represent possible complications and causes of postoperative anal pain in patients that have undergone stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR). The etiology of these complications is still questioned such as the treatment modality. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) 0.4 % in determining decrease of incidence of postoperative anal spams and fissure and reduction of early postoperative pain. From a total of 243 patients referred for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) 104 (42.7 %) underwent STARR and were randomized to receive (Group 1) or not (Group 2) topical 0.4 % GTN ointment every 12 h for four postoperative weeks. Postoperative evaluation was made at 1, 6, and 12 months. At 1 month follow-up, the incidence of anal spasm in Groups 1 and 2 was, respectively, 0 and 14.6 % (6/41) (p = 0.010; Fisher's exact test). The incidence of anal fissure was 4/41 (9.7 %) in Group 2 and 0/44 (0 %) in Group 1 (p = 0.05; Fisher's exact test). Significant differences in median visual analogue scale score between groups were found at 1 week and 1 month follow-up (1; 0-5 vs. 2; 0-7: p = 0.0104; Mann-Whitney U test). Anal spasm and fissure may represent a cause of early postoperative anal pain in patients that have undergone STARR procedure for ODS. The use of topical GTN 0.4 % ointment in the early postoperative course seems to reduce the incidence of anal spasm and fissure and to improve the associated early postoperative pain.

Sigmoid volvulus: is it a possible complication after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR)?

We report a case of sigmoid volvulus post-stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation. The patient, a 68-yearold woman with chronic constipation and dolichosigma, two days post-STARR presented severe abdominal pain. CT revealed sigmoid ischemia. The patient underwent resection of the sigmoid colon with end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure). Can STARR procedure produce a serious complication as sigmoid volvulus in patient with dolichosigma and obstructed defecation syndrome?

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defaecation syndrome: patients with previous pelvic floor surgery have poorer long‐term outcome

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) is used for patients with obstructive defaecation syndrome (ODS) not responding to conservative management. Reports indicate mixed results and there are no studies publishing the long-term outcome. Following full investigation, 37 patients with ODS underwent a STARR procedure by one of the authors (SP) between 2005 and 2010. The median (range) patient age was 53.0 (28-79) years and all were female. Median (range) follow up was 13 (0-57) months, and nine (24.3%) patients were followed for longer than 24months. Eighteen patients had undergone at least one (and often multiple) previous gynaecological procedures, including hysterectomy (n=14), colposuspension (n=3), vaginal rectocele repair (n=4) and pelvic floor repair (n=5). Four patients had had at least one previous rectal operation [stapled anopexy (n=3) and Delorme's procedure (n=2)]. One patient did not attend for postoperative follow up. Of the remaining 36 patients, 18 had resolution of obstructive symptoms. Of the 18 with residual symptoms, 17 eventually reported the same level of symptoms as before the STARR procedure. There was a significant correlation between the presence of residual symptoms and long-term ODS recurrence (P<0.0005). For those with residual symptoms, the mean (95% CI) time to symptom recurrence was 3 (2.86-11.81) months. Twenty (56%) patients were satisfied with the outcome from the STARR procedure. Residual symptoms are a strong indicator of long-term failure. STARR was effective for symptom resolution in 50% of patients. Those who had undergone pelvic floor or rectal prolapse surgery were significantly more likely to experience recurrent symptoms.

Die STARR-Operation zur Therapie des obstruktiven Defäkationssyndroms

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has become a well-evaluated surgical procedure for the treatment of outlet obstruction in the context of conservative refractory obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The diagnosis of ODS needs to be objectified which can be best ensured by clinical scoring systems. Besides a general coloproctological examination, dynamic defecography represents the most important diagnostic procedure. Pelvic floor dyssynergia and slow transit constipation should always be taken into account for the differential diagnosis and for which the STARR procedure is generally contraindicated. Surgery is performed via a transanal approach using a full thickness rectal resection of either the ventral or dorsal proportion of the rectal wall in the PPH01 conventional procedure or circumferentially by monoblock resection in the contour transtar® procedure. Morbidity is best characterised by data of the European STARR registry which contains a total number of n = 2,838 consecutive patients. The overall morbidity rate was 36 % whereby urgency (20 %) and bleeding (5 %) were the most frequent complications. More favourable data have been published in single centre studies. Functional results are available with a follow-up of 1 year up to 68 months postoperatively. Response rates of up to 90 % were reported whereas recurrence rates were given with a maximum of 18 % at 68 months follow-up. In summary, the STARR procedure provides good functional results in conservative refractory outlet obstruction with minor morbidity and the outcome seems to remain stable in the long-term follow-up.

Results in the long-term course after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR)

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has recently been recommended for patients with obstructed defecation caused by rectocele and rectal wall intussusception. Our study investigates the long-term results and predictive factors for outcome. Between November 2002 and February 2007, 80 patients (69 females) were operated on using the STARR procedure and included in the following study. Symptoms were defined according to the ROME II criteria. Preoperative assessment included clinical examination, colonoscopy, video defecography, and dynamic MRI. Preoperatively and during follow-up visits, we evaluated the Cleveland Constipation Score (CCS) to rate the severity of outlet obstruction and the Wexner Incontinence Score to rate anal incontinence. Patients were asked to judge the outcome of the operation as improved or poor/dissatisfied. We performed a univariate analysis for 11 patient- and disease-related factors to detect an association with outcome. The median follow-up was 39 months (range 20-78). Major postoperative complications (one staple line insufficiency, one urosepsis, one prolonged urinary dysfunction with indwelling catheter) were found in 3.8%. The result after STARR procedure was a success in the long-term follow-up in 62 patients (77.5%), although the improvement did not persist in 15 patients (18.7%). The mean value of the CCS decreased significantly from 9.3 before surgery to 4.6 after 2 years and increased again slightly to 6.5 after 4-6 years. The Median Wexner Incontinence Score was 3.3 at baseline, but rose significantly to 6.0. However, a third of patients who reported deteriorated continence developed the symptoms 1-4 years after surgery. Of the factors investigated for the prediction of outcome, we could only identify the number of pelvic floor changes in defecography or dynamic MRI as being associated with the success of the operation. Our study indicates that STARR is a safe procedure. A significant improvement of symptoms is to be expected, but this improvement may deteriorate with time. Patients' satisfaction is also associated with the occurrence of urge to defecate or incontinence. It remains difficult to predict outcome.

Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders

To prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) compared to standard conservative treatment, and whether preoperative symptoms and findings at defecography and anorectal manometry can predict the outcome of STARR. Thirty patients (Female, 28; age: 51 ± 9 years) with rectocele or rectal intussusception, a defecation disorder, and functional constipation were submitted for STARR. Thirty comparable patients (Female, 30; age 53 ± 13 years), who presented with symptoms of rectocele or rectal intussusception and were treated with macrogol, were assessed. Patients were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire at study enrollment and 38 ± 18 mo after the STARR procedure or during macrogol treatment. A responder was defined as an absence of the Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional constipation. Defecography and rectoanal manometry were performed before and after the STARR procedure in 16 and 12 patients, respectively. After STARR, 53% of patients were responders; during conservative treatment, 75% were responders. After STARR, 30% of the patients reported the use of laxatives, 17% had intermittent anal pain, 13% had anal leakage, 13% required digital facilitation, 6% experienced defecatory urgency, 6% experienced fecal incontinence, and 6% required re-intervention. During macrogol therapy, 23% of the patients complained of abdominal bloating and 13% of borborygmi, and 3% required digital facilitation. No preoperative symptom, defecographic, or manometric finding predicted the outcome of STARR. Post-operative defecography showed a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) of the rectal diameter and rectocele. The post-operative anorectal manometry showed that anal pressure and rectal sensitivity were not significantly modified, and that rectal compliance was reduced (P = 0.01). STARR is not better and is less safe than macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. It could be considered as an alternative therapy in patients unresponsive to macrogol.

Resected specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up after STARR procedures

To investigate stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures as surgical techniques for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) by analyzing specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up. From January to December 2007, we have treated 30 patients. Fifteen treated with double PPH-01 staplers and 15 treated using new CCS 30 contour. Resected specimen were measured with respect to average surface and volume. All patients have been evaluated at 24 mo with clinical examination, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography. Average surface in the CCS 30 group was 54.5 cm² statistically different when compared to the STARR group (36.92 cm²). The average volume in the CCS 30 group was 29.8 cc, while in the PPH-01 it was 23.8 cc and difference was statistically significant. The mean hospital stay in the CCS 30 group was 3.1 d, while in the PPH-01 group the median hospital stay was 3.4 d. As regards the long-term follow-up, an overall satisfactory rate of 83.3% (25/30) was achieved. Endoanal ultrasonography performed 1 year following surgery was considered normal in both of the studied groups. Mean resting pressure was higher than the preoperative value (67.2 mmHg in the STARR group and 65.7 mmHg in the CCS30 group vs 54.7 mmHg and 55.3 mmHg, respectively). Resting and squeezing pressures were lower in those patients not satisfied, but data are not statistically significant. The STARR procedure with two PPH-01 is a safe surgical procedure to correct ODS. The new Contour CCS 30 could help to increase the amount of the resected tissue without differences in early complications, post-operative pain and in hospital stay compared to the STARR with two PPH-01 technique.

Anatomical and functional results after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defaecation syndrome

The STARR procedure is a surgical option for the treatment of rectocoele associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of this technique in restoring anatomy and the long-term sustainability of symptom control and quality of life. Of 48 patients operated on from 2003 to 2007, 30 were enrolled for this prospective assessment of anatomical correction and functional improvement of ODS. Results from a standardised questionnaire concerning functional results (ODS score), faecal incontinence (Cleveland Clinic score) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) were prospectively collected. Systematic dynamic defaecography, together with anorectal physiology testing, were performed before surgery and 6 months after. 25 patients were available for long-term assessment of functional outcome (more than 4 years). The mean age of the population was 57 +/- 7 years. STARR produced significant improvements in the PAC QoL (p < 0.05) and ODS score (p < .0001), but not in the incontinence score. At defaecography, correction was significant with respect to the depth (p = 0.007), perimeter (p < 0.0001) and neck (p = 0.001) of rectocoele. Anorectal physiology revealed a lower maximal tolerated rectal volume (p<.0001). After 58 months, the 25 patients showed sustained functional results and QoL. Four patients (16%) underwent further surgical procedure for pelvic floor disorders and 8 patients (32%) still required laxatives. Our study confirms the efficacy of the STARR procedure, with sustained improvement in function and QoL. However, a substantial number of patients remain symptomatic.