Standard Total Hip Replacement Research Articles

Initial results in restoration of some anatomical dimensions in standard cementless total hip replacement

Objective: To give initial results in the restoration of some important anatomical parameters (femoral neck angle, distance from the center of the crest to the femoral axis (offset), and limb deviation) in the standard cementless total hip replacement in the treatment of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. Subject and method: In studies in the period from 2/2021 to 6/2021, the authors used the Medi-CAD software integrated on the computer to determine the femoral neck angle, the distance from the center of the crest to the femoral axis (offset), the limb deviation of 24 hip joints was surveyed on 20 patients at the time preoperative and postoperative with standard Zimmer hip joints. The method used in this study is a cross-sectional, prospective study. Result: The results show that the mean postoperative femoral neck angle was 131.1 ± 3.2º while the preoperative size was 129.8 ± 3.4º. The average postoperative offset size was 35.6 ± 4.8mm and higher than before surgery was 32.5 ± 5.4mm. Postoperative limb deviation was 3.2 ± 2.7mm and lower than preoperative was 12.3 ± 4.5mm, the difference was insignificant statistically. Conclusion: Research results show that the closer the femoral neck angle and the offset is to the original value, the better the limb balance.

My current indications for hip resurfacing

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a viable option for young male patients with end stage osteoarthritis. The controversy surrounding the technique has resulted in a decline in worldwide numbers being performed. However, with appropriate patient selection and well designed and proven implants it offers results equal or superior to that of a standard total hip replacement in this high demand population. In this focused paper we present the factors taken into consideration when selecting patients for the procedure in order to maximise positive outcomes.

Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve.

Background:The concept of femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement (THR) was introduced in 1993. It is postulated that retaining cortical bone of the femoral neck offers triplanar stability, uniform stress distribution, and accommodates physiological anteversion. However, data on safety, efficacy and learning curve are lacking.Materials and Methods:We prospectively assessed all patients who were operated for a THR with a short neck preserving stem (MiniHip) between 2012 and 2014. The safety and learning curve were assessed by recording operative time; stem size; and adverse events including periprosthetic fracture; paresthesia; and limb length discrepancy (LLD). The cohort was divided into equal groups to assess the learning curve effect, and the cumulative sums (CUSUM) test was performed to monitor intraoperative neck fractures. For assessment of efficacy, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores were compared preoperatively and postoperatively.Results:138 patients with median age 62 years (range 35–82 years) were included with a median followup of 42 months (range 30–56 months). The minimum followup was 2.5 years. The OHS, SF-36 (physical and mental component) scores improved by a mean score of 26, 28, and 27 points, respectively. All patients had LLD of <10 mm (1.9 mm ± 1.3). Adverse events included intraoperative neck fracture (n = 6), subsidence (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture (n = 1), paresthesia (n = 12), and trochanteric bursitis (n = 2). After early modification of the technique to use a smaller finishing broach, the CUSUM test demonstrated acceptable intraoperative neck fracture risk. The second surgery group had a reduced risk of intraoperative neck fracture (5/69 vs. 1/69 P = 0.2), reduced operative time (66 vs. 61 min, P = 0.06), and increased stem size (5 vs. 6, P = 0.09) although these differences were not statistically significant.Conclusions:The MiniHip stem is safe alternative to standard THR with good functional outcomes but with a learning curve for the surgical technique, implants sizing, and the risk of intraoperative neck fractures.

Supervised neuromuscular exercise prior to hip and knee replacement: 12-month clinical effect and cost-utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundThere are indications of beneficial short-term effect of pre-operative exercise in reducing pain and improving activity of daily living after total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Though, information from studies conducting longer follow-ups and economic evaluations of exercise prior to THR and TKR is needed. The aim of the study was to analyse 12-month clinical effect and cost-utility of supervised neuromuscular exercise prior to THR and TKR surgery.MethodsThe study was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial including 165 patients scheduled for standard THR or TKR at a hospital located in a rural area of Denmark. The patients were randomised to replacement surgery with or without an 8-week preoperative supervised neuromuscular exercise program (Clinical Trials registration no.: NCT01003756). Clinical effect was measured with Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were based on EQ-5D-3L and Danish preference weights. Resource use was extracted from national registries and valued using standard tariffs (2012-EUR). Incremental net benefit was analysed to estimate the probability for the intervention being cost effective for a range of threshold values. A health care sector perspective was applied.ResultsHOOS/KOOS quality of life [8.25 (95% CI, 0.42 to 16.10)] and QALYs [0.04 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.07)] were statistically significantly improved. Effect-sizes ranged between 0.09-0.59 for HOOS/KOOS subscales. Despite including an intervention cost of €326 per patient, there was no difference in total cost between groups [€132 (95% CI −3942 to 3679)]. At a threshold of €40,000, preoperative exercise was found to be cost effective at 84% probability.ConclusionPreoperative supervised neuromuscular exercise for 8 weeks was found to be cost-effective in patients scheduled for THR and TKR surgery at conventional thresholds for willingness to pay. One-year clinical effects were small to moderate and favoured the intervention group, but only statistically significant for quality of life measures.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01003756) October 28, 2009.

Indications for dual-mobility hip replacements

This project was aiming to look at the indications for dual-mobility hip replacements. Dual-mobility hip replacements are a type of total hip replacement which aim to increase stability compared to standard total hip replacement due to the large head size, increased range of motion, and, at least theoretically, reduce wear due to lower frictional torque. Lancashire Teaching Hospitals Trust began using dual-mobility hip replacements in 2013, and this retrospective analysis looks at each of the 174 patients who received one since then to discover why they were put in and how this relates to the NICE guidelines for treating certain types of hip problems. The results have shown that 102 were primary hip replacements for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femur, 31 were revisions for instability and 41 were for other indications, both primary and revision. Of the 174 dualmobility cups put in, 3 have dislocated, but all were reduced successfully and have remained stable since. This gives the dual-mobility cups a current revision rate of 0%, which is very successful in comparison to the average revision rate for a standard (non-dual-mobility) total hip replacement.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Acetabulum Reconstruction Technique with Acetabulum Reconstruction Cage and Threaded Rods after Type II Pelvic Resections.

Background. Periacetabular resections with reconstruction has high rates of complications due to the complexity of the reconstruction. We have improvised a novel technique of reconstruction for type II and type II + III pelvic resections with the use of a commercially available acetabulum reconstruction cage (gap II, Stryker) and threaded rods. Objectives. The aim of our study is to determine the biomechanical strength of our reconstruction compared to the traditional cemented total hip replacement (THR) designs in normal acetabulum and establish its mode of failure. Methods. Five sets of hemipelvises were biomechanically tested (Instron® 3848, MA, USA). These constructs were subjected to cyclic loading and load to failure. Results. The reconstructed acetabulum was stiffer and required a higher load to failure compared to the intact pelvis with a standard THR. The mean stiffness of the reconstructed pelvis was 1738.6 ± 200.3 Nmm−1 compared to the intact pelvis, which was 911.4 ± 172.7 Nmm−1 (P value = 0.01). The mean load to failure for the standard acetabular cup construct was 3297.3 ± 117.7 N while that of the reconstructed pelvis with the acetabulum cage and threaded rods was 4863.8 ± 7.0 N. Conclusion. Reconstruction of the pelvis with an acetabular reconstruction cage and threaded rods is a biomechanical viable option.

Results of hip arthroplasty using Paavilainen technique in patients with congenitally dislocated hip

The purpose of the study was to analyze the medium- and long-term results of hip arthroplasty using Paavilainen technique in patients with the congenitally dislocated hip. Methods: From 2001 to 2012 180 operations were carried out were using the Paavilainen technique in 140 patients with high dislocation of the hip (Crowe IV). All patients were clinically evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), VAS and radiography. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficients, multiple regression analysis and classification trees analysis. Results: The average Harris score improved from preoperative 41.6 (40,3-43,5) to 79.3 (77,9-82,7) at final follow-up, and the difference was significant. Early complications were 9% (the most frequent were fractures of the proximal femur), later - 16.7% (pseudoarthrosis of the greater trochanter, 13.9%; disclocations-1,1%, aseptic loosening of the components - 1.7%), reoperation performed in 8.3% of cases. Such factors as age and limb length has statistically significant effect on functional outcomes. Established predictive model allows to get the best possible functional outcome in such patients with severe dysplasia. Conclusions: Total Hip arthroplasty using the Paavilainen technique is an effective method of surgical treatment in patients with the congenitally dislocated hip, but it is technically difficult operation with a high incidence of complications in comparison with standard primary total hip replacement.

Confronting hip resurfacing and big femoral head replacement gait analysis.

Improved hip kinematics and bone preservation have been reported after resurfacing total hip replacement (THRS). On the other hand, hip kinematics with standard total hip replacement (THR) is optimized with large diameter femoral heads (BFH-THR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes of THRS and BFH-THR and correlate these results to bone preservation or the large femoral heads. Thirty-one patients were included in the study. Gait speed, postural balance, proprioception and overall performance. Our results demonstrated a non-statistically significant improvement in gait, postural balance and proprioception in the THRS confronting to BFH-THR group. THRS provide identical outcomes to traditional BFH-THR. The THRS choice as bone preserving procedure in younger patients is still to be evaluated.

Acetabular fractures

Total hip replacement (THR) after acetabular fracture presents unique challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon. The majority of patients can be treated with a standard THR, resulting in a very reasonable outcome. Technical challenges however include infection, residual pelvic deformity, acetabular bone loss with ununited fractures, osteonecrosis of bone fragments, retained metalwork, heterotopic ossification, dealing with the sciatic nerve, and the difficulties of obtaining long-term acetabular component fixation. Indications for an acute THR include young patients with both femoral head and acetabular involvement with severe comminution that cannot be reconstructed, and the elderly, with severe bony comminution. The outcomes of THR for established post-traumatic arthritis include excellent pain relief and functional improvements. The use of modern implants and alternative bearing surfaces should improve outcomes further.

Dynamic behavior of tripolar hip endoprostheses under physiological conditions and their effect on stability

Tripolar systems have been implanted to reduce the risk of recurrent dislocation. However, there is little known about the dynamic behavior of tripolar hip endoprostheses under daily life conditions and achieved joint stability. Hence, the objective of this biomechanical study was to examine the in vivo dynamics and dislocation behavior of two types of tripolar systems compared to a standard total hip replacement (THR) with the same outer head diameter.Several load cases of daily life activities were applied to an eccentric and a concentric tripolar system by an industrial robot. During testing, the motion of the intermediate component was measured using a stereo camera system. Additionally, their behavior under different dislocation scenarios was investigated in comparison to a standard THR.For the eccentric tripolar system, the intermediate component demonstrated the shifting into moderate valgus-positions, regardless of the type of movement. This implant showed the highest resisting torque against dislocation in combination with a large range of motion. In contrast, the concentric tripolar system tended to remain in varus-positions and was primarily moved after stem contact. According to the results, eccentric tripolar systems can work well under in vivo conditions and increase hip joint stability in comparison to standard THRs.

Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups

Dual mobility cup systems in total hip arthroplasty consist of a metal back with a non-constrained liner, in which a constrained standard head articulates. While superior stability of such implants in comparison with standard total hip replacements is assumed, it is the purpose of this study to outline the biomechanical concept of dual mobility cups and to describe implant survival and dislocation rate based on the series published in the English-speaking and Francophone literature. A growing body of evidence indicates reduced dislocation rates in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty and in selected tumour cases. The limited availability of studies evaluating long-term implant survival and existing concerns with regard to increased wear rates and aseptic loosening, leads to the conclusion that such implants have to be used with prudence, particularly in standard primary hip arthroplasty and in young patients.

Single Mini-Incision Total Hip Replacement for the Management of Arthritic Disease of the Hip

Mini-incision total hip replacement continues the current trend in orthopaedics and other specialties toward smaller-incision surgery. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of single mini-incision compared with standard-incision total hip replacement for treatment of arthritis of the hip. We conducted an electronic literature search for relevant studies published in any language up to March 2010. Key conference proceedings and national orthopaedic registries were searched, professional organizations and implant manufacturers were approached, and reference lists from included studies were screened. We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials assessing single mini-incision surgery, defined as an incision of ≤ 10 cm, compared with standard primary total hip replacement. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. Fifteen randomized and five quasi-randomized controlled trials, involving 1857 participants, were eligible. Included trials were of mixed methodological quality, with the sample size ranging from twenty to 219. Mean follow-up periods were short, ranging from six weeks to three years. Compared with standard total hip replacement, mini-incision procedures may have small perioperative advantages in terms of less blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter inpatient stay, but the differences were not clinically important. Few complications were reported, and the complication rate did not differ significantly between groups. There was insufficient evidence to suggest any major difference in the short-term revision rate, and confidence intervals for surrogate measures for long-term outcome were broad enough to include clinically important differences in favor of either approach. Although there were marginal short-term advantages and disadvantages for each of the surgical techniques, there was no strong evidence either for or against mini-incision compared with standard-incision total hip replacement. Importantly, evidence on longer-term performance, especially the risk of revision arthroplasty, for mini-incision hip arthroplasty is very limited.

Versorgung der hohen Hüftluxation (Crowe-IV-Hüfte) mit einer zementfreien Individualendoprothese und z-förmiger subtrochantärer Femurverkürzung

Total hip arthroplasty in patients with a Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia is a technically demanding procedure with a higher complication rate compared to a standard total hip replacement. Specific anatomic features and the necessity of a femoral shortening osteotomy are the reasons for more complications. In this retrospective study we intended to find out whether the use of a custom-made stem based on a CT scan will lead to a better outcome including a lower complication rate. MATERIAL UND METHOD: From 2003 to 2010 we implanted a cementless CTX® individual stem in combination with a subtrochanteric Z-shaped shortening osteotomy in 25 patients with a high hip dislocation, four of them were men (one bilateral) and 16 women (four bilateral). Mean age of the patients was 44.6 years. In all cases the cup was implanted at the level of the anatomic hip centre. Patients were followed with a clinical and radiographic assessment. The morphology of the femur was analysed by CT scans. The average amount of femoral shortening was 3.4 cm (max. 4.2/min. 2.6 cm). Lengthening of the leg was achieved with an average of 3.8 cm (max. 4.4/min. 3.2 cm). The remaining leg length discrepancy was 0.8 cm (max. 1.2/min. 0.4 cm). In none of the cases did an intraoperative fracture of the femur occur, either in the proximal or in the distal part of the femur. Enlargement of the intramedullary canal was not necessary in any case. The planned depth of the prosthesis could be achieved in all patients. We did not observe any problems with wound healing in our patients. The average Harris hip score was 90 (83 up to 100). Additional cerclage wires are not necessary with this technique when the osteotomy is well adapted. After complete healing the osteotomy can just be noticed by a certain hypertrophy of the cortical bone. In our cases we had a complication rate of 16 %, significantly lower in comparison to literature values. Total hip arthroplasty in type IV developmental dysplasia with a custom-made stem based on a CT scan is a procedure that respects the special anatomic features preoperatively und is able to correct the deformity with the individually manufactured prosthesis. High femoral anteversion is corrected at the level of the neck of the stem. There is no necessity for a derotation at the level of the osteotomy. The osteotomy is stabilised by the Z-shape and through a perfect intramedullary fit of the stem. The anatomic shape of the subtrochanteric region is perfectly suitable to perform a femoral shortening.

HiL simulation in biomechanics: A new approach for testing total joint replacements

Instability of artificial joints is still one of the most prevalent reasons for revision surgery caused by various influencing factors. In order to investigate instability mechanisms such as dislocation under reproducible, physiologically realistic boundary conditions, a novel test approach is introduced by means of a hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) simulation involving a highly flexible mechatronic test system. In this work, the underlying concept and implementation of all required units is presented enabling comparable investigations of different total hip and knee replacements, respectively. The HiL joint simulator consists of two units: a physical setup composed of a six-axes industrial robot and a numerical multibody model running in real-time. Within the multibody model, the anatomical environment of the considered joint is represented such that the soft tissue response is accounted for during an instability event. Hence, the robot loads and moves the real implant components according to the information provided by the multibody model while transferring back the position and resisting moment recorded. Functionality of the simulator is proved by testing the underlying control principles, and verified by reproducing the dislocation process of a standard total hip replacement. HiL simulations provide a new biomechanical testing tool for analyzing different joint replacement systems with respect to their instability behavior under realistic movements and physiological load conditions.

Recovery in mechanical muscle strength following resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty – a randomised clinical trial

To evaluate the effect of resurfacing vs standard total hip replacement on post-surgery hip and knee muscle strength recovery in a prospective randomised controlled trial at the Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. Forty-three patients were randomised into (A) standard total hip arthroplasty (S-THA) and (B) resurfacing total hip arthroplasty (R-THA). Pre-surgery assessment and follow-up were conducted (8, 26 and 52wks). Maximal isometric muscle strength (Nm) and between-limb asymmetry for the knee extensors/flexors, hip adductors/abductors, hip extensors/flexors were analysed. Maximal knee extensor and hip abductor strength were higher in S-THA than R-THA at 52wks post-surgery (P≤0.05) and hip extensors tended to be higher in S-THA at 52wks (P=0.06). All muscle groups showed substantial between-limb strength asymmetry (7-29%) with the affected side being weakest (P≤0.05) and hip flexors being most affected. Asymmetry was present in half of the muscle groups at 26wks (P≤0.05), and remained present for the hip flexors and hip adductors at 52wks (P≤0.05). R-THA patients showed an attenuated and delayed recovery in maximal lower limb muscle strength (in 2/6 muscle groups) compared to S-THA. Notably, the attenuated strength recovery following R-THA was most markedly manifested in the late phase (1yr) of post-surgical recovery, and appeared to be due to the detachment of the lower half of the gluteus maximus muscle rather than implant design per se. Thus, the present data failed to support the hypothesis that R-THA would result in an enhanced strength rehabilitation compared to S-THA. Further, between-limb asymmetry remained present for hip flexors and adductors after 52wks. NCT01229293.

What happens to femoral neck bone mineral density after hip resurfacing surgery?

The major advantage of hip resurfacing is the decreased amount of bone resection compared with a standard total hip replacement. Fracture of the femoral neck is the most common early complication and poor bone quality is a major risk factor. We undertook a prospective consecutive case control study examining the effect of bone mineral density changes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing surgery. A total of 423 patients were recruited with a mean age of 54 years (24 to 87). Recruitment for this study was dependent on pre-operative bilateral femoral bone mineral density results not being osteoporotic. The operated and non-operated hips were assessed. Bone mineral density studies were repeated over a two-year period. The results showed no significant deterioration in the bone mineral density in the superolateral region in the femoral neck, during that period. These findings were in the presence of a markedly increased level of physical activity, as measured by the short-form 36 health survey physical function score.

Tackling the learning curve: comparison between the anterior, minimally invasive (Micro-hip®) and the lateral, transgluteal (Bauer) approach for primary total hip replacement

There is still conflicting evidence about the true benefit of minimally invasive (MI) techniques in total hip replacement (THR). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the safeness of a MI approach during the learning curve of a single surgeon. Second, clinical and radiographic results among the MI THR group were compared with the results using a standard transgluteal (Bauer) approach. 86 primary unilateral total hip arthroplasties (THAs) through a MI, anterior (Micro-hip(®)) approach were performed by a single senior surgeon (ES), representing a consecutive series of patients after beginning with the MI technique. Cases were compared to a matched cohort of patients who were treated with a standard transgluteal (Bauer) approach. Operation time, incision length, perioperative blood loss, haemoglobin level and blood transfusions were monitored. Complications were documented and followed up 1 year postoperatively. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), range of motion, use of analgetics, the Trendelenburg sign, sensibility of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and the acetabular/femoral component placement as well as potential heterotopic ossifications were analysed in both the groups after 12 months postoperatively. 74 MI THR patients and 60 standard THR patients were available for the one year follow-up. Operative time was significantly longer in the MI group, reduction in the haemoglobin level during the first 24 h was significant and the length of skin incision was significantly shorter. No significant differences were found for HHS, range of motion, use of analgetics, the Trendelenburg sign, and the acetabular/femoral component placement, heterotopic ossifications and intra- and postoperative complications. Sensibility of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was affected in three patients in the MI group. Radiographic evaluation revealed no component migration, implant subsidence or radiolucency signs in both the groups. Consistent with recent meta-analysis we found reduced blood loss, similar clinical/radiographic outcome and similar complication rates compared to standard THA. Our study shows, that MI THR is a safe procedure during the learning curve of an experienced surgeon.

Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches.

BackgroundThe tissue sparing surgery (TSS) concept means not only smaller incisions but also less tissue disruption, allowing decreased blood loss and improved function. However, TSS techniques can result in more complications related to the learning curve. The aim of this study was to compare the learning curve of an experienced surgeon with different TSS approaches for total hip replacement (THR) from a clinical and surgical point of view, focussing especially on complications related to the use of different geometric stems.Materials and methodsSixty patients scheduled to be operated for a primary THR were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to surgery by one of three different TSS approaches: lateral with mini incision (group A), minimally invasive anterior (group B) and minimally invasive antero-lateral (group C). Results from the three TSS groups were compared with a control group of 149 patients (group D).ResultsOur results reveal significantly reduced blood loss in the TSS groups compared with the control group, with no differences between the TSS groups. We found better early functional scores in the two minimally invasive groups (anterior and anterolateral), and a lower rate of complications with the antero-lateral TSS approach.ConclusionThe antero-lateral TSS approach seems to be safer and less demanding than standard THR surgery, and is suitable for use with different stems.

Biomechanische Aspekte zur Implantatverankerung und Kinematik von Oberflächenersatzhüftendoprothesen

Hip resurfacing is undergoing a resurgence in orthopaedic surgery with an increasing number of implantations. The objective of this article is to present the biomechanical basics of implant anchorage as well as the kinematics of hip resurfacing implants.Today, fixation of the femoral component onto the prepared femoral head is mainly done using bone cement. Depending on the implant design, the bone structures beneath the femoral component can be exposed to stress shielding, followed by degradation of the bone density and subsequent initiation of implant loosening. However, the trabecular bone has the ability to adapt itself to the fixation peg, to additional cement pegs, and to the elastic properties of the femoral component as well. The acetabular component is mainly inserted into the bone stock without using cement. Provided that large prosthetic heads will be applied, thin-walled acetabular cups are crucial for bone-saving preparation of the acetabular bone stock. Nearly all hip resurfacing systems are currently based on metal-on-metal wear-bearing couples. The acetabular components are mainly designed as monoblock implants, which can make subsequent revision difficult. Kinematic analyses show a significantly lower range of motion of hip resurfacing implants compared with modern standard (stemmed) total hip replacement systems. This difference originates from the small ratio of the resurfaced femoral head diameter and the relatively thick neck of the femur. Impingement of the femur neck onto the rim of the acetabular component can result in subluxation, deformation of the bearing surfaces, femoral neck fracture, and impairment of the bony anchorage of the hip resurfacing implants.

Resurrection of hip resurfacing: what is the evidence?

Total hip resurfacing has long been conceptually attractive to both surgeons and patients. However, historically it has been plagued by limited durability and marked acetabular bone loss. The recent development of wear-resistant bearings, such as metal-on-metal, has led to renewed interest in hip resurfacing in the orthopedic community. Several resurfacing implants have been designed and positive results, particularly in young patients, have been reported. Although comparative studies of hip resurfacing and standard total hip replacement are still lacking, we believe that there is now evidence to demonstrate that this surgical concept deserves consideration, particularly when treating young patients with hip diseases.