Standard Therapy For Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

New CXCR4 Antagonist Peptide R (Pep R) Improves Standard Therapy in Colorectal Cancer.

The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is overexpressed and functional in colorectal cancer. To investigate the role of CXCR4 antagonism in potentiating colon cancer standard therapy, the new peptide CXCR4 antagonist Peptide R (Pep R) was employed. Human colon cancer HCT116 xenograft-bearing mice were treated with chemotherapeutic agents (CT) 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) and oxaliplatin (OX) or 5FU and radio chemotherapy (RT-CT) in the presence of Pep R. After two weeks, CT plus Pep R reduced by 4-fold the relative tumor volume (RTV) as compared to 2- and 1.6-fold reductions induced, respectively, by CT and Pep R. In vitro Pep R addition to CT/RT-CT impaired HCT116 cell growth and further reduced HCT116 and HT29 clonal capability. Thus, the hypothesis that Pep R could target the epithelial mesenchyme transition (EMT) process was evaluated. While CT decreased ECAD and increased ZEB-1 and CD90 expression, the addition of Pep R restored the pretreatment expression. In HCT116 and HT29 cells, CT/RT-CT induced a population of CD133+CXCR4+ cells, supposedly a stem-resistant cancer cell population, while Pep R reduced it. Taken together, the results showed that targeting CXCR4 ameliorates the effect of treatment in colon cancer through inhibition of cell growth and reversal of EMT treatment-induced markers, supporting further clinical studies.

Phase 1 study of napabucasin, a cancer stemness inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

PurposeNapabucasin is a cancer stemness inhibitor that targets a number of oncogenic pathways, including signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Phase 1/2 studies suggest tolerability and anti-tumor activity in various types of cancer; a Phase 3 study of napabucasin plus standard therapy in colorectal cancer is ongoing. This is a Phase 1 dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors, and the first study of napabucasin in Japanese patients.MethodsPatients received napabucasin 480, 960, or 1440 mg daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary objectives were to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of napabucasin. Blood samples were taken for PK analysis on Days 1, 2, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, and Days 29 and 30 of Cycle 2. Secondary objectives were to assess napabucasin antitumor activity, and the relationship between biomarkers and antitumor activity. JapicCTI-No: JapicCTI-132152.ResultsEnrolled were 14 patients (480 mg [n = 3], 960 mg [n = 4], 1440 mg [n = 7]). One patient experienced a DLT (Grade 3, anorexia). MTD was 1440 mg/day. Most common drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (n = 9), nausea (n = 4), vomiting (n = 3), and anorexia (n = 3). Napabucasin showed a similar PK profile to previous studies and no abnormal accumulation was observed. Following treatment, two patients had stable disease; the remaining 12 had progressive disease.ConclusionNapabucasin was well-tolerated at doses up to 1440 mg/day in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors; the PK profile was comparable to that reported previously.

Abstract CT055: Microdose induced oxaliplatin-DNA adducts as a predictive biomarker of response in colorectal cancer

Abstract Background Combination 5-FU and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is standard therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings. However, oxaliplatin neuropathy is the main dose-limiting toxicity that often necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation before progression. Prediction of oxaliplatin sensitivity in tumor cells would be valuable for dose optimization to maximize anti-tumorigenic effect and limit sensory neuropathy. Oxaliplatin functions via the formation of covalent drug-DNA adducts which ultimately inhibit cell replication and promote apoptosis. Detection of these drug-DNA adducts could serve as a biomarker of oxaliplatin efficacy. We therefore hypothesized that drug-DNA adduct levels induced by sub-therapeutic "diagnostic microdoses" are proportional to those induced by therapeutic doses and are predictive of tumor responses. Methods The feasibility of this predictive diagnostic microdosing approach was assessed in CRC cell culture and a pilot clinical trial of six CRC patients. Four CRC cell lines were cultured with therapeutically relevant (100 µM) or diagnostic microdose (1 µM) concentrations of [14C]oxaliplatin. The C-14 label enabled quantification of oxaliplatin-DNA adduct levels with accelerator mass spectrometry, an ultrasensitive isotope analysis technique. Adduct formation was correlated with oxaliplatin cytotoxicity as measured by the MTT viability assay. In a pilot clinical trial (NCT02569723), six CRC patients received an intravenous diagnostic microdose containing [14C]oxaliplatin prior to treatment and a second [14C]oxaliplatin dose during FOLFOX chemotherapy. Adduct levels from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), used as surrogates for tumor cells, were correlated to mean tumor volume change of evaluable target lesions. Results Drug-DNA adduct levels were linearly proportional between microdoses and therapeutically relevant concentrations in cell culture (R2 = 0.91, p < 0.0001) and patient samples (R2 = 0.63, p < 0.0001). Plasma pharmacokinetics of microdoses were consistent with those of therapeutic dosing. No microdose-associated toxicity was observed in this patient population. PBMC adduct levels significantly correlated with tumor shrinkage (microdose: R2 = 0.82, p = 0.033; therapeutic dose: R2=0.65, p = 0.099). Conclusion Diagnostic microdosing with oxaliplatin is feasible and is predictive of oxaliplatin sensitivity in CRC patients. Citation Format: Justin Chen, May Cho, Maike Zimmermann, Thomas Semrad, Chun-Yi Wu, Aiming Yu, Chong-Xian Pan, Paul T. Henderson, Edward J. Kim. Microdose induced oxaliplatin-DNA adducts as a predictive biomarker of response in colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT055.

Abstract B24: De novo and acquired resistance to first-line standard therapy in colorectal cancer: from cell lines to metastatic tumors

Abstract Introduction: Personalized medicine (PM) is a concept that has raised high expectations amongst scientists, clinicians, and patients. An emerging approach is to examine tumor biopsy material for genomic changes that are known targets of currently available therapeutic agents, with the assumption that a clinical benefit will be observed if the target is inhibited. While striking anecdotal reports are predictable from this approach, the clinical impact of these agents is limited by the inevitable development of therapeutic resistance. Our focus is on the design of parallel research programs using both in vitro and in vivo strategies, in an effort to delay or inhibit resistance. We present here preliminary data for a signature of resistance to standard first-line treatment - fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab (FOLFOX/B) using cell line models of resistance to this regimen. In parallel, we are conducting a prospective study to identify biomarkers of clinical resistance to first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (NCT00984048). Methods: Ten established CRC cell lines were treated with FOLFOX/B and categorized as resistant or sensitive based on IC50 values. In parallel, patients who consented to an initial biopsy and one at disease progression following an initial response were identified as intrinsically resistant or as having acquired resistance during treatment. CRC cell lines that were initially sensitive were rendered resistant to mimic the acquired resistance in patients, by serial passages with gradual increases in concentration of the combination regimen. We compared microarray data from three sensitive and three resistant cell lines. Results: We found a different expression pattern from microarray data comparing sensitive and resistant cell lines, thereby indicating a potential signature of resistance to FOLFOX/B. Interestingly, we found that the Src family kinase Lyn was overexpressed in resistant cells lines. Treating cells with non-cytotoxic concentration of dasatinib, a dual Src family kinase and Abl inhibitor, sensitized both the parental sensitive cells and the cells with acquired resistance to FOLFOX/B, thereby suggesting that combination treatment with dasatinib may be effective in delaying or inhibiting resistance. We have thus far collected needle core biopsies from liver metastases from forty patients who agreed to partake in this multi-center trial. Eligible patients have confirmed metastatic CRC, measurable disease, and consent to three needle-core biopsies (NCBs) of a non-resectable liver metastasis before treatment and at resistance, as well as serial blood collection throughout the study. Using standard operating procedures developed for this trial, we were able to both preserve morphology and obtain high-quality genomic material from biopsy tissue. We will determine if the resistance signature and overexpression of Lyn observed in the resistant CRC cell lines are similarly demonstrated in patients that were intrinsically resistant to FOLFOX/B. Conclusions: We have designed parallel in vitro and in vivo experiments to study resistance to standard first-line treatment for mCRC. These studies provide insight on metastatic signatures of resistance and suggest combination therapies to delay or inhibit therapeutic resistance in patients.

Combination of dasatinib and curcumin eliminates chemo-resistant colon cancer cells

Metastatic colorectal cancer remains a serious health concern with poor patient survival. Although 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or 5-FU plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is the standard therapy for colorectal cancer, it has met with limited success. Recurrence of the tumor after chemotherapy could partly be explained by the enrichment of the chemo-resistant sub-population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that possess the ability for self-renewal and differentiation into different lineages in the tumor. Therefore development of therapeutic strategies that target CSCs for successful treatment of this malignancy is warranted. The current investigation was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of the combination therapy of dasatinib (a Src inhibitor) and curcumin (a dietary agent with pleiotropic effect) in inhibiting the growth and other properties of carcinogenesis of chemo-resistant colon cancer cells that are enriched in CSCs sub-population. Remnants of spontaneous adenomas from APCMin +/- mice treated with dasatinib and/or curcumin were analyzed for several cancer stem cell markers (ALDH, CD44, CD133 and CD166). Human colon cancer cells HCT-116 (p53 wild type; K-ras mutant) and HT-29 (p53 mutant; K-ras wild type) were used to generate FOLFOX resistant (referred to as CR) cells. The effectiveness of the combination therapy in inhibiting growth, invasive potential and stemness was examined in colon cancer CR cells. The residual tumors from APCMin +/- mice treated with dasatinib and/or curcumin showed 80-90% decrease in the expression of the CSC markers ALDH, CD44, CD133, CD166. The colon cancer CR cells showed a higher expression of CSCs markers, cell invasion potential and ability to form colonospheres, compared to the corresponding parental cells. The combination therapy of dasatinib and curcumin demonstrated synergistic interactions in CR HCT-116 and CR HT-29 cells, as determined by Calcusyn analysis. The combinatorial therapy inhibited cellular growth, invasion and colonosphere formation and also reduced CSC population as evidenced by the decreased expression of CSC specific markers: CD133, CD44, CD166 and ALDH. Our data suggest that the combination therapy of dasatinib and curcumin may be a therapeutic strategy for re-emergence of chemo-resistant colon cancer by targeting CSC sub-population.

Abstract 3503: Targeting chemo-resistant colon cancer cells by the combination of dasatinib and curcumin: A novel therapeutic strategy

Abstract Metastatic colorectal cancer remains a serious health concern with poor patient survival. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or 5-FU plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), the standard therapy for colorectal cancer, has met with limited success. Recurrence of the tumor after chemotherapy could partly be explained by the enrichment of the chemo-resistant sub-population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that possess the ability for self-renewal and differentiation into different lineages in the tumor. Therefore development of therapeutic strategy that target CSCs is highly desirable in reducing the risk of relapse and metastasis. The current investigation was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of the combination therapy of dasatinib (a Src inhibitor) and curcumin (a dietary ingredient) in inhibiting the growth and other properties of carcinogenesis of chemo-resistant colon cancer cells that are enriched in CSCs. Human colon cancer cells HCT-116 (p53 wild type; K-ras mutant) and HT-29 (p53 mutant; K-ras wild type) were used to generate FOLFOX resistant {referred to as chemoresistant (CR)} cells. The CR cells showed higher expression of CSCs markers, cell invasion potential and ability to form colonospheres, compared to the corresponding parental cells. The combination therapy of dasatinib and curcumin demonstrated synergistic interactions in CR-HCT-116 and CR-HT-29 cells. This caused inhibition of cellular growth, invasion and colonosphere formation and reduction in CSC population as evidenced by decreased expression of CSC specific markers: CD133, CD44, CD166 and ALDH. In conclusion, we propose that the combination therapy of dasatinib and curcumin may be an effective therapeutic strategy for re-emergence of chemo-resistant colon cancer by targeting CSC sub-population. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3503. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3503

Challenges toward personalized treatment of localized colorectal cancer.

Challenges toward personalized treatment of localized colorectal cancer.

Analysis of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (xelox) combination in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer compare with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin combination (folfox)

Background : Combinations of Fluorouracil (FU) and biomodulator Leucovorin (LV) established as a standard regimen for therapy of colorectal cancer with metastases. To give better antitumor activity in colorectal cancer therapy, oxaliplatin is combined with FU/LV and give significant improvement. Fluorouracil can only be given by intravenous administration. This limitation raised effort to find alternative drugs that can be given orally, such as capecitabine. Capecitabine is an oral FU prodrug, with high oral bioavailability, highly accumulated in neoplastic tissue to be converted in FU, and well tolerated. Some clinical studies revealed effectivity of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) compared to FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). Objective : This article is aimed to compare non inferiority of XELOX to FOLFOX in colorectal cancer with metastases, viewed form primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. Results : XELOX was comparable to FOLFOX with some benefitsover FOLFOX. Conclusion : XELOX could be considered as FOLFOX replacement as a standard therapyfor colorectal cancer with metastases.

Racial disparities and treatment trends in a large cohort of elderly African Americans and Caucasians with colorectal cancer, 1991 to 2002

Racial differences have been demonstrated in patients who receive treatment for colorectal cancer. However, little is known about whether these disparities have changed over time. The objective of this study was to determine whether racial disparities in receiving standard therapy have declined between 1991 and 2002. The study population consisted of 59,803 Caucasians and African Americans aged > or =65 years who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I, II, and III) between 1991 and 2002 and were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program/Medicare-linked database. Standard therapy for colorectal cancer was defined based on the Physician Data Query guidelines from the National Cancer Institute. The crude and age- and sex-adjusted percentages and the odds ratios (ORs) of receiving standard therapy were reported. From 1991 to 2002, the percentage of patients who did not receive standard therapy for colorectal cancer decreased for both Caucasians (from 24.5% to 22.4%) and African Americans (from 30.4% to 26.4%). Overall, African Americans were 16% less likely to receive standard therapy for colorectal cancer (OR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.90) than Caucasians, but the difference was not significant after the analysis was adjusted for other factors (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88-1.05). The gap for not receiving standard therapy was relatively stable, peaked in 1997 (7.2%), and decreased from 1999 to 2002 (from 7.1% to 4%). The percentage of patients receiving standard therapy for colorectal cancer increased over time, but disparities remained and decreased in recent years. Future studies should include other ethnic groups and should incorporate provider and system factors that may contribute to treatment disparities.

Phase 1b Dose Escalation Study of Erlotinib in Combination with Infusional 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Erlotinib (Tarceva) is a potent epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1) inhibitor. Infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is a standard therapy for colorectal cancer. This trial assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of erlotinib combined with FOLFOX. Patients with advanced solid tumors were sequentially enrolled into three cohorts (cohort 1: 100 mg/d erlotinib, 65 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m(2) leucovorin, 400 mg/m(2) bolus 5-FU, and 400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion 5-FU; cohort 2: oxaliplatin increased to 85 mg/m(2) and 5-FU infusion increased to 600 mg/m(2); and cohort 3: erlotinib increased to 150 mg/d). Thirty-two patients were enrolled (23 with colorectal cancer): no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed in cohort 1. In cohort 2, two of nine patients experienced a DLT (both diarrhea). In cohort 3, two of nine patients had a DLT (diarrhea and staphylococcal septicemia). Cohort 3 determined the MTD cohort and expanded to 17 patients in total. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, stomatitis, and rash (primarily mild/moderate). No pharmacokinetics interactions were observed. One patient (colorectal cancer) had a complete response, seven patients had a partial response, and nine had stable disease. The MTD was defined as follows: 150 mg/d erlotinib, 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin; 200 mg/m(2) leucovorin, 400 mg/m(2) bolus 5-FU, and 600 mg/m(2) infusion 5-FU. At the MTD, the combination was well tolerated and showed antitumor activity, warranting further investigation in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and other solid tumors.

MF tricyclic and sulindac retard tumor formation in an animal model

New selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors offer the benefit of cancer protection with less gastrointestinal toxicity associated with nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We hypothesize that MF tricyclic and sulindac can retard all stages of tumor formation in nude mice. In a blinded placebo controlled study, 3 types of experiments were performed: 1) 2.5 x 10(6) cells were injected into 2 flanks of nude mice subcutaneously, as a model for in situ cancer (n = 192); 2) 1 x 10(6) cells were injected into the cecum of mice as a model for in situ colorectal cancer (n = 78) and 3) 0.5 x 10(6) cells were implanted into the splenic subcapsule to establish a colorectal cancer liver metastasis model (n = 78). The animals were fed with standard chow containing either placebo, MF tricyclic (67 mg/kg of chow) or sulindac (150 mg/kg of chow). Mice that were given MF tricyclic or sulindac, at clinical anti-inflammatory plasma concentrations, were significantly more tumor free and had significantly smaller primary tumors and fewer metastases, as compared to mice that consumed placebo. The mortality and the latency period were significantly better in the treatment groups. These findings suggest that selective COX-2 inhibitors may serve as an adjunct to standard therapy in colorectal cancer.

Glutathione S-transferase P1 I105V (GSTP1 I105V) polymorphism is associated with early onset of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity

3509 Background: Sensory neurotoxicity (sNT) is the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin, the integral component of the FOLFOX regimen which has emerged as standard therapy in colorectal cancer. Variations in genes potentially involved in the detoxification (glutathione system: GSTP1, GSTM1) or the cytotoxic mechanism (nucleotide excision repair: ERCC2, XRCC1) of oxaliplatin could serve as genetic predictors of susceptibility to oxaliplatin’s neurotoxic effects. Methods: Germline DNA was extracted from whole blood of 299 patients (pts) who received FOLFOX4 on Intergroup study N9741. Four genetic variants (GSTP1 I105V, GSTM1 del, ERCC2 K751Q, XRCC1 R399Q) were tested for association with the time to development of grade 2/3 sNT and sNT as reason for treatment discontinuation. In addition, pts who developed grade 2 (3) neurotoxicity before a cumulative oxaliplatin dose of 600 (800) mg/m2 was reached were compared to an equal number of pts that tolerated extremely high cumulative doses of oxaliplatin. Resul...

Bevacizumab an improvement on standard therapy in colorectal cancer

Bevacizumab an improvement on standard therapy in colorectal cancer

Progress in colorectal cancer chemotherapy: how far have we come, how far to go?

Fluorouracil has been the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) for almost 40 years. Various schedules and biochemical modulators have been investigated in an attempt to improve the therapeutic efficacy of fluorouracil. To date, fluorouracil plus folinic acid represents the standard therapy in CRC for the adjuvant treatment of patients at high risk for relapse and for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease. To gain clinical acceptance, however, oral fluoropyrimidines must confer at least the same survival advantages associated with the optimal intravenous fluorouracil regimens. Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are 2 other novel agents that have mechanisms of action that are uniquely different from those of fluorouracil, with demonstrated activity in patients with fluorouracil-refractory disease. Recent randomised trials comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid with combinations of either irinotecan or oxaliplatin and fluorouracil plus folinic acid have shown that response rates are improved and time to progression is increased in patients receiving the combination regimens. These regimens are being rapidly introduced in the adjuvant setting, and the role and acceptance of these combination regimens as first-line therapy needs to be defined. Other novel agents being evaluated in the treatment of patients with advanced CRC include oral edrecolomab (monoclonal antibody 17-1A) and tumour vaccines. Future research is focused on enabling clinicians to individualise treatment strategies in patients with CRC, so as to improve clinical outcomes and reduce drug toxicity.