Standard Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Research Articles

S121. The role of intraoperative dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in the absence of changes in standard somatosensory evoked potentials during spine surgeries: A case series

Introduction Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring is used to potentially avoid permanent injury as a result of surgical manipulation. During spine surgeries, standard monitoring of median or posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) can be insensitive and fail to identify useful intraoperative changes in neural function. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEPs) have previously been shown to be valuable in identifying specific nerve root dysfunction during surgeries involving spinal decompression, fusion, or tumor resections. Methods Between 2012 and 2017, 2785 spine surgeries were performed with intraoperative monitoring at our institution. Of these, 1884 cases utilized DSEP monitoring in addition to standard SEPs of the median and posterior tibial nerves. Results We highlight 7 cases during which intraoperative DSEPs were able to independently identify changes that were not observed through standard mixed nerve SEPs. During these cases, we observed improvements that correlated with adequate neural decompression, real-time changes in individual nerve root function, as well as provided intraoperative monitoring feedback to surgeons when reliable SEP signals were not obtained. Conclusion DSEP monitoring can serve as a useful and sensitive adjunct method for intraoperative monitoring that may provide additional information to surgeons and patients undergoing spine surgeries. The limitation of DSEP monitoring is that it requires coordination between anesthesiologists, surgeons, and skilled monitoring technicians.

30. Vegetative versus minimally conscious states: A study using TMS-EEG, sensory and event-related potentials

We used electroencephalography (EEG) recordings to evaluate the cortical reactivity and effective connectivity during TMS in chronic VS or MCS patients. Moreover, the TMS-EEG data were compared with the results from standard somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and event-related potentials (ERPs). Thirteen patients with chronic consciousness disorders were examined at their bedsides. The amplitudes (reactivity) and scalp distributions (connectivity) of the cortical potentials evoked by TMS (TEPs) of the primary motor cortex were measured. Short-latency median nerve SEPs and auditory ERPs were also recorded. Reproducible TEPs were present in all control subjects in both the ipsilateral and the contralateral hemispheres relative to the site of the TMS. The amplitudes of the ipsilateral and contralateral TEPs were reduced in four of the five MCS patients, and the TEPs were bilaterally absent in one MCS patient. Five VS patients did not manifest ipsilateral or contralateral TEPs and three exhibited only ipsilateral TEPs with reduced amplitudes. The SEPs were altered in five VS and two MCS patients. ERPs were impaired in all patients and did not correlate with the clinical diagnosis. TEPs may add valuable information to the current clinical and neurophysiological assessment of chronic consciousness disorders.

Vegetative versus Minimally Conscious States: A Study Using TMS-EEG, Sensory and Event-Related Potentials

Differential diagnoses between vegetative and minimally conscious states (VS and MCS, respectively) are frequently incorrect. Hence, further research is necessary to improve the diagnostic accuracy at the bedside. The main neuropathological feature of VS is the diffuse damage of cortical and subcortical connections. Starting with this premise, we used electroencephalography (EEG) recordings to evaluate the cortical reactivity and effective connectivity during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in chronic VS or MCS patients. Moreover, the TMS-EEG data were compared with the results from standard somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and event-related potentials (ERPs). Thirteen patients with chronic consciousness disorders were examined at their bedsides. A group of healthy volunteers served as the control group. The amplitudes (reactivity) and scalp distributions (connectivity) of the cortical potentials evoked by TMS (TEPs) of the primary motor cortex were measured. Short-latency median nerve SEPs and auditory ERPs were also recorded. Reproducible TEPs were present in all control subjects in both the ipsilateral and the contralateral hemispheres relative to the site of the TMS. The amplitudes of the ipsilateral and contralateral TEPs were reduced in four of the five MCS patients, and the TEPs were bilaterally absent in one MCS patient. Among the VS patients, five did not manifest ipsilateral or contralateral TEPs, and three of the patients exhibited only ipsilateral TEPs with reduced amplitudes. The SEPs were altered in five VS and two MCS patients but did not correlate with the clinical diagnosis. The ERPs were impaired in all patients and did not correlate with the clinical diagnosis. These TEP results suggest that cortical reactivity and connectivity are severely impaired in all VS patients, whereas in most MCS patients, the TEPs are preserved but with abnormal features. Therefore, TEPs may add valuable information to the current clinical and neurophysiological assessment of chronic consciousness disorders.

Do we activate specifically somatosensory thin fibres with the concentric planar electrode? A scalp and intracranial EEG study

Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) are acknowledged as the most reliable laboratory tool for assessing thermal and pain pathways. Electrical stimulation with a newly developed planar concentric electrode, delivering stimuli limited to the superficial skin layers, has been suggested to provide selective activation of Aδ fibres without the inconveniences linked to laser stimulation. The aim of our study was to compare the scalp and intracranial responses to planar concentric electrode stimulation (CE-SEPs) with those of LEPs and standard somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). Sixteen healthy subjects, 6 patients with intracortical electrodes, and 2 patients with selective lesions of the spinothalamic pathway were submitted to Neodymium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Perovskite laser stimulations, and electrical stimulations using standard electrodes or planar concentric electrodes (CE). In both healthy controls and epileptic implanted patients, CE- and standard SEPs showed significantly shorter latencies than LEPs. This is consistent with Aβ-fibre activation, peripheral activation time being unable to account for longer LEP latencies. In the patients with spinothalamic lesions, LEPs were absent after stimulation of the affected territory, while CE-SEPs were still present. For these 2 reasons, we conclude that the planar CE does not selectively activate the Aδ and C fibers, but coexcites a significant proportion of large myelinated Aβ fibres that dominate the ensuing cortical response. The use of CE-SEPs for the detection of spinothalamic system lesions is therefore not warranted; the planar electrode can, however, represent a useful tool to study nociceptive reflexes, which can be reliably elicited even in the presence of Aβ coactivation.

Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the radial and median nerves: component structure and scalp topography.

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after radial nerve stimulation are studied less frequently than those after median nerve stimulation. Therefore, little is known about their component structure and scalp topography. We investigated radial nerve SEPs after electrical stimulation at the left wrist. For comparison, the median nerve was also stimulated at the wrist. SEPs were recorded with 15 scalp electrodes (bandpass 0.5-200 Hz) in 27 healthy subjects. The waveform of the radial nerve SEP at a contralateral parietal lead was comparable to that of the median nerve SEP, consisting of P14, N20, P30, and N60. In spite of comparable stimulus intensities, SEP amplitudes were smaller after radial than after median nerve stimulation. Significant latency differences were found only for N20 (earlier for median nerve) and P30 (earlier for radial nerve). The duration of the primary complex N20-P30 thus was significantly shorter for the radial nerve. Whereas N20 and P30 were present with either earlobe or frontal reference, N60 had a prerolandic maximum and was best recorded with a bipolar transverse derivation. In addition, another middle-latency negativity (N110) was found near the secondary somatosensory cortex, which had previously been described only for radial nerve stimulation. In standard SEP derivations, the N110 is riding on the ascending limb of the vertex negativity. It could best be recorded in low temporal leads versus a midline reference. The scalp topographies of P30, N60, and N110 were similar for radial and median nerve stimulation.