Standard Laparoscopic Tools Research Articles

Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hand size, strength, and stature all impact a surgeon's ability to perform Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery (TLS) comfortably and effectively. This is due to limitations in instrument and operating room design. This article aims to review performance, pain, and tool usability data based on biological sex and anthropometry. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched in May 2023. Retrieved articles were screened based on whether a full-text, English article was available in which original results were stratified by biological sex or physical proportions. Article quality was discussed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were summarized in three main themes: task performance, physical discomfort, and tool usability and fit. Task completion times, pain prevalence, and grip style results between male and female surgeons formed three meta-analyses. A total of 1354 articles were sourced, and 54 were deemed suitable for inclusion. The collated results showed that female participants, predominantly novices, took 2.6-30.1s longer to perform standardized laparoscopic tasks. Female surgeons reported pain at double the frequency of their male colleagues. Female surgeons and those with a smaller glove size were consistently more likely to report difficulty and require modified (potentially suboptimal) grip techniques with standard laparoscopic tools. The pain and stress reported by female or small-handed surgeons when using laparoscopic tools demonstrates the need for currently available instrument handles, including robotic hand controls, to become more size-inclusive. However, this study is limited by reporting bias and inconsistencies; furthermore, most data was collected in a simulated environment. Additional research into how anthropometric tool design impacts the live operating performance of experienced female surgeons would further inform this area of investigation.

Transplantation of small ovarian tissue fragments using pipelle device is effective: method evaluation and reproductive outcomes.

To assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and reproductive outcomes of transplantation of tiny cryopreserved ovarian pieces through a pipelle cannula during laparoscopic surgery. A retrospective study of patients who underwent ovarian tissue transplantation for fertility restoration between 2004 and 2022. The "pipelle group" had their ovarian cortex cut into tiny pieces of ~ 1-2 mm3 before cryopreservation. The pieces were too small to be handled and transplanted via standard laparoscopic tools. Transplantation was performed using a pipelle cannula during laparoscopic surgery. The "control group" underwent transplants of ovarian cortex pieces 1-2mm thick, measuring approximately 25-50 mm2 pieces, using standard procedures. The pipelle group consisted of 4 patients aged 19, 21, 27, and 28years old at ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). The control group consisted of 14 patients aged 21-30years old. All pipelle patients restored their endocrine activity, and all of them conceived. FSH levels dropped during the first 3months following the pipelle transplant. IVF cycle outcomes were similar for both groups. All patients from the pipelle group conceived, resulting in 5 pregnancies and 4 live births (one patient had 2 deliveries, and one additional pregnancy is ongoing), compared to the control group, where 8 patients achieved a total of 20 pregnancies and 18 live births. Pipelle transplantation for tiny cryopreserved ovarian pieces is feasible and effective. This study opens a door for patients who had their ovaries cut into small pieces and may even simplify the procedure in some instances, making ovarian transplant more accessible. (#6531-19-SMC) [18/09/2019].

Adaptable Tools and Women’s Job Performance in Male-Dominated Fields: Evidence from Robotic Surgery

Physical tools often privilege the average characteristics of the male body. However, technological advances have the potential to introduce more adaptable tools which are adjustable and require less physical force to operate. In this work, we investigate whether the introduction of such tools correlate with better job performance for women employees as compared to men. We examine this question among laparoscopic surgeons using microdata from the State of Florida between 2009 and 2015. Standard laparoscopic tools privilege men because they are built for taller users with larger hands, requiring significant physical force to operate. Robotic surgical tools, in contrast, are customizable to a surgeon’s physique and require less physical force to operate. Findings suggest that the use of robotic tools correlates with significant performance improvements for both men and women. However, female surgeons experience larger surgical performance improvements as compared with male surgeons. These improvements further intensify when the surgeon has a high recent caseload or works in a male-dominated surgical unit. Yet, we find that women are no more likely to use robotic surgical tools than men are. Drawing on ex post interviews with surgeons, we posit that gender barriers may limit women’s access to cutting-edge tools that supplant outmoded tools designed with men’s bodies in mind.

Robotic-like suturing with FlexDex Surgical System® for difficult laparoscopic suture

The field of laparoscopic surgery has experienced an exponential growth in recent years. Despite great progress in this field, standard laparoscopic tools have not been optimally developed and still have some deficiencies when it comes to mobility and ergonomics.Robotic surgery has attempted to solve these problems by improving the articulation of surgical instruments. However, it presents a series of disadvantages, among which are its high cost, low availability and the need for specific training, which conditions its profitability and hinders widespread use.We present the results of a prospective clinical series of 20 cases in which the safety, efficacy and ergonomics of FlexDex® have been tested for performing laparoscopic intracorporeal sutures. The result is a safe and functional tool that offers both control and precision in its handling, while improving the ergonomics of the surgeon. This device represents an alternative that combines the precision and range of movements of robotic surgery with the greater availability of conventional laparoscopy.

Sutura laparoscópica mecanizada con FlexDex Surgical System® para ubicaciones anatómicamente difíciles

The field of laparoscopic surgery has experienced an exponential growth in recent years. Despite great progress in this field, standard laparoscopic tools have not been optimally developed and still has some deficiencies when it comes to mobility and ergonomics.Robotic surgery has attempted to solve these problems by improving the articulation of surgical instruments. However, it presents a series of disadvantages, among which are its high cost, low availability and the need of a specific training, which conditions its profitability and hinders a widespread use.We present the results of a prospective clinical series of 20 cases in which the safety, efficacy and ergonomics of FlexDex® have been tested for performing laparoscopic intracorporeal sutures. The result is a safe and functional tool that offers both control and precision in its handling, while improves the ergonomics of the surgeon. This device represents an alternative that combines the precision and range of movements of robotic surgery with the greater availability of conventional laparoscopy.

Use of error management theory to quantify and characterize residents’ error recovery strategies

BackgroundTraditional checklist metrics for surgical performance can miss key intraoperative decisions that impact procedural outcomes. Error-based assessments may help identify important metrics for evaluating operative performance and resident readiness for independent practice. MethodsThis study utilized human factors error analysis and error management theory to investigate a previously collected video database of resident performance during a simulated laparoscopic ventral hernia (LVH) repair on a table-top simulator using standard laparoscopic tools and mesh. Errors were deconstructed and coded using a structured observation tool and video analysis software. Error detection events and error recovery events were categorized for each operative step of the ventral hernia repair. ResultsResidents made a total of 314 errors (M = 15.7, SD = 4.96). There were more technical errors (63%) than cognitive errors (37%) and more commission errors (69%) than omission errors (30%). Almost half (47%) of all errors went completely undetected by the residents for the entire LVH repair. Of the errors that residents attempted to recover (n = 136), 86.0% were successfully recovered. Technical errors were four times more likely to be successfully recovered than cognitive errors (p = .020). ConclusionsOur results revealed specific details regarding residents’ error management strategies and provides validity evidence for the use of human factors error frameworks in surgical performance assessments. Practice in simulation-based learning environments may improve resident decision-making and error management opportunities by providing a structured experience where errors are explicitly characterized and used for training and feedback. Error management training may play a major role in equipping residents and junior faculty with the skills required for independent, high-quality operative performance.

A Novel Intuitively Controlled Articulating Instrument for Reoperative Foregut Surgery: A Case Report

The field of laparoscopic surgery has continued to grow exponentially over the years, prompting new innovative technologies. Despite substantial advancements, standard laparoscopic tools have undergone little design changes and fail to optimize mobility in limited spaces. Advancements in robotics have attempted to address this, allowing for increasing degrees of freedom and articulation of instruments. Even so, this system has proven to be cumbersome with questionable cost-effectiveness. In this study, we present the first use of a solely mechanical intuitively controlled articulating laparoscopic needle driver. The ability to naturally articulate allowed for ease during suturing and knot tying during the critical portions of the operation. The FlexDex surgical instrument demonstrates promise in the field of foregut surgery in addition to other areas of minimally invasive specialties.

A modular force-controlled robotic instrument for minimally invasive surgery - efficacy for being used in autonomous grasping against a variable pull force.

Many deficiencies of minimally invasive robotic surgery systems can be eliminated by using automated laparoscopic tools with force measurement and control capability. A fully modular, automated laparoscopic instrument with a proximal force sensory system was designed and fabricated. The efficacy of the instrument was evaluated experimentally when functioning in an autonomous force-controlled grasping scheme. The designed instrument was shown to work easily with standard laparoscopic tools, with the whole distal part detachable for autoclave sterilization. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the actual pinch force from the target ramp was 0.318 N; it was 0.402 N for a sinusoidal pull force, which dropped by 21% using a static friction compensation. A secure grasping condition was achieved, in spite of this error, by applying a sufficiently large margin from the slip boundary. With a simple and practical design, the instrument enjoys affordability, versatility and autoclave sterilizability for clinical usage, with an acceptable performance for being used in an auto-grasping control scheme. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux

Based on results from year 2 of a 5-year trial, in 2012 the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a magnetic device to augment lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We report the final results of 5 years of follow-up evaluation of patients who received this device. We performed a prospective study of the safety and efficacy of a magnetic device in 100 adults with GERD for 6 months or more, who were partially responsive to daily proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and had evidence of pathologic esophageal acid exposure, at 14 centers in the United States and The Netherlands. The magnetic device was placed using standard laparoscopic tools and techniques. Eighty-five subjects were followed up for 5 years to evaluate quality of life, reflux control, use of PPIs, and side effects. The GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire was administered at baseline to patients on and off PPIs, and after placement of the device; patients served as their own controls. A partial response to PPIs was defined as a GERD-HRQL score of 10 or less on PPIs and a score of 15 or higher off PPIs, or a 6-point or more improvement when scores on vs off PPI were compared. Over the follow-up period, no device erosions, migrations, or malfunctions occurred. At baseline, the median GERD-HRQL scores were 27 in patients not taking PPIs and 11 in patients on PPIs; 5 years after device placement this score decreased to 4. All patients used PPIs at baseline; this value decreased to 15.3% at 5 years. Moderate or severe regurgitation occurred in 57% of subjects at baseline, but only 1.2% at 5 years. All patients reported the ability to belch and vomit if needed. Bothersome dysphagia was present in 5% at baseline and in 6% at 5 years. Bothersome gas-bloat was present in 52% at baseline and decreased to 8.3% at 5 years. Augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter with a magnetic device provides significant and sustained control of reflux, with minimal side effects or complications. No new safety risks emerged over a 5-year follow-up period. These findings validate the long-term safety and efficacy of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device for patients with GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00776997.

A Novel Totally Internal Laparoscopic Liver Retractor

Minimally invasive surgery is still in evolution. Throughout the past two decades numerous devices have been developed to enable safer and faster procedures, including anastomosis creating devices, energy sources, and superior imaging. However, retraction capabilities were put aside and currently, organ laparoscopic retraction is based on standard laparoscopic tools. In the era of minimizing the number of ports and shrinking their size, our aim was to develop internal retraction device that could be placed in the peritoneal cavity through a standard trocar, positioned for adequate retraction, and left in place for the entire procedure. These devices would obviate the need for inserting ports dedicated for retraction only and hence contribute to the reduction of the number of incisions. Herein, we present our initial experience with a novel internal liver retractor. The Endolift retractor is a simple telescopic rod that has anchoring claws at each end. It can be inserted using 5 mm standard trocar using a dedicated applier and anchored to the peritoneum beside the liver edges thereby lifting the undersurface of the liver and exposing the organs underneath. To achieve retraction of the left lateral segment, the Endolift retractor is anchored lateral to the right diaphragmatic crus on 1 side and lateral to the falciform ligament on the other. A total of 14 operations were performed using the Endolift retractor for liver retraction including antireflux procedure, robotic-assisted Heller's myotomy, bariatric procedures, and bile duct exploration. The left lobe of the liver was adequately retracted and enabled access to the operating field. Repositioning was easily performed with progression of the surgery when necessary. Internal retraction devices such as the Endolift retractor for liver retraction are one step further in minimizing trauma to the abdominal wall during minimal invasive surgery. It obviates the need for extra incisions, frees up the surgeons' hands, and may enable performing complicated laparo-endoscopic single-site laparoscopy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a miniature robot to perform complex, single-incision, minimal access surgery. Instrument positioning and lack of triangulation complicate single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and open surgical procedures are highly invasive. Using minimally invasive techniques with miniature robotic platforms potentially offers significant clinical benefits. A miniature robot platform has been designed to perform advanced laparoscopic surgery with speed, dexterity, and tissue-handling capabilities comparable to standard laparoscopic instruments working through trocars. The robotic platform includes a dexterous in vivo robot and a remote surgeon interface console. For this study, a standard laparoscope was mounted to the robot to provide vision and lighting capabilities. In addition, multiple robots could be inserted through a single incision rather than the traditional use of four or five different ports. These additional robots could provide capabilities such as tissue retraction and supplementary visualization or lighting. The efficacy of this robot has been demonstrated in a nonsurvival cholecystectomy in a porcine model. The procedure was performed through a single large transabdominal incision, with supplementary retraction being provided by standard laparoscopic tools. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a dexterous robot platform for performing single-incision, advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic Surgical Robot for Remote In Vivo Training

The Laparobot is a tele-operated robot designed specifically for training surgeons in advanced laparoscopic techniques. The Laparobot allows a student to practice surgery on a remotely located animal. The system uses standard laparoscopic tools for both the student's control interface and for performing the in vivo surgery, thereby providing a realistic training platform for non-robotic laparoscopic surgery. By allowing students to practice surgery remotely, animal models become more accessible and less expensive, and can replace learning on human patients. The Laparobot addresses problems inherent in designing a low-cost, tele-operated robot.

A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices

Surgical robotics has been promoted as an enabling technology. This study tests the hypothesis that use of the robotic surgical system can significantly improve technical ability by comparing the performance of both experts and novices on a complex laparoscopic task and a robotically assisted task. Laparoscopic experts (LE) with substantial laparoscopic and robotic experience (n = 9) and laparoscopic novices (LN) (n = 20) without any robotic experience performed sequentially 10 trials of a suturing task using either robotic or standard laparoscopic instrumentation fitted to the ProMIS surgical simulator. Objective performance metrics provided by ProMIS (total task time, instrument pathlength, and smoothness) and an assessment of learning curves were analyzed. Compared with LNs, the LEs demonstrated significantly better performance on all assessment measures. Within the LE group, there was no difference in smoothness (328 +/- 159 vs 355 +/- 174; P = .09) between robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic tasks. An improvement was noted in total task time (113 +/- 41 vs 132 +/- 55 sec; P < .05) and instrument pathlengths (371 +/- 163 vs 645 +/- 269 cm; P < .05) when using the robot. This advantage in terms of total task time, however, was lost among the LEs by the last 3 trials (114 +/- 40 vs 118 +/- 49 s; P = .84), while instrument pathlength remained better consistently throughout all the trials. For the LNs, performance was significantly better in the robotic trials on all 3 measures throughout all the trials. The ProMIS surgical simulator was able to distinguish between skill levels (expert versus novice) on robotic suturing tasks, suggesting that the ProMIS is a valid tool for measuring skill in robot-assisted surgery. For all the ProMIS metrics, novices demonstrated consistently better performance on a suturing task using robotics as compared to a standard laparoscopic setup. This effect was less evident for experts who demonstrated improvements only in their economy of movement (pathlength), but not in the speed or smoothness of performance. Robotics eliminated the early learning curve for novices, which was present when they used standard laparoscopic tools. Overall, this study suggests that, when performing complex tasks such as knot tying, surgical robotics is most useful for inexperienced laparoscopists who experience an early and persistent enabling effect. For experts, robotics is most useful for improving economy of motion, which may have implications for the highly complex procedures in limited workspaces (eg, prostatectomy).

Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy: The Slice and Pull Technique

From August 1995 to April 1996 20 patients underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Ages ranged from 3 weeks to 3 months and weights from 2.1 to 5.4 kg. The technique involved the use of one 3.5-mm trocar, a single 3.4-mm babcock clamp, a 2.7-mm or a 1.6-mm zero degree telescope with accompanying sheath, and a 3-mm serrated sheathed arthroscopy knife. AH procedures were completed successfully. The average operating time was 13 min. Feeds were started 4 to 8 h postoperatively and advanced on a 2 h basis. Nineteen of the twenty patients were discharged in under 24 h and one was kept until postoperative day 2 because of feed intolerance. There were no complications. This technique for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is fast, safe, and effective, and can be performed with standard laparoscopic tools.