Standard Error Of Measurement Research Articles

The Development and Evaluation of the Kinesthetic Motor Imagery of Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction Questionnaire (KMI-PFQ) in Spanish Women.

Practitioners have begun using motor imagery (MI) for preventing and treating some pelvic floor disorders. Due to requirements for imagining before performing a MI intervention and because there are few instruments available for assessing this specific ability in the pelvic floor musculature, we sought to develop and test a new MI questionnaire, the Kinesthetic Motor Imagery of Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction Questionnaire (KMI-PFQ). We focused in this study on the development and analysis of the instrument's factorial structure and internal reliability in a participant sample of 162 healthy Spanish women (M age = 20.1, SD = 2.2 years). We developed and evaluated the KMI-PFQ's psychometric properties, finding it to have good internal consistency, with Cronbach's α = .838, ω coefficient = .839, and an intraclass correlation coefficient = .809, with two factors ("ability" and "mental effort") explaining 58.36% of response variance. The standard error of measurement was 3.58, and the minimal detectable change was 9.92. No floor or ceiling effects were identified. There was also good convergent validity as seen by statistically significant positive correlations between KMI-PFQ scores and the revised-Movement Image Questionnaire and Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire. There were no statistically significant correlations between KMI-PFQ scores and the Orientation to Life Questionnaire. The KMI-PFQ is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring kinesthetic ability to feel/imagine pelvic floor muscle contractions in healthy Spanish women.

Reliability of Voluntary Response Index Analysis Using Surface Electromyography in Professional Football Players

Background: Surface electromyography (sEMG) represents a widely utilized technique in medical research. The voluntary response index (VRI) introduces a novel method for analyzing the motor control of voluntary movements via sEMG. This study aimed to assess the reliability of VRI and breakpoint angles (BPA) among professional football players during the Nordic Hamstring test (NHT). Methods: This study included 24 healthy professional football players. Through the use of sEMG, two aspects of VRI [magnitude (MAG) and similarity index (SI)] were evaluated during the NHT. Additionally, BPAs were determined by capturing slow-motion videos of functional tasks. The test-retest reliability across three trials was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The reliability of the VRI components during the NHT was found to be excellent. The ICC for MAG was 0.9 and 0.81 for the SI. Breakpoint angles exhibited moderate reliability (ICC = 0.65) during a functional task. The SI displayed a lower standard error of measurement (SEM = 0.07). The MAG’s SEM was 0.25, while BPA’s SEM was 17.8. Conclusions: The analysis of the VRI via sEMG showed nearly perfect reliability in professional football players during the NHT, a functional task. Breakpoint angles demonstrated significant reliability. The findings of this study indicate that both VRI and BPA are reliable methods for estimating motor control during dynamic movement tasks in professional athletes.

Reliability of a New Digital Tool for Photographic Analysis in Quantifying Body Asymmetry in Scoliosis.

Background: Advancements in non-ionizing methods for quantifying spinal deformities are crucial for assessing and monitoring scoliosis. In this study, we analyzed the observer variability of a newly developed digital tool for quantifying body asymmetry from clinical photographs. Methods: Prospective observational multicenter study. Initially, a digital tool was developed using image analysis software, calculating quantitative measures of body asymmetry. This tool was integrated into an online platform that exports data to a database. The tool calculated 10 parameters, including angles (shoulder height, axilla height, waist height, right and left waistline angles, and their difference) and surfaces of the left and right hemitrunks (shoulders, waists, pelvises, and total). Subsequently, an online training course on the tool was conducted for twelve observers not involved in its development (six research coordinators and six spine surgeons). Finally, 15 standardized back photographs of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were selected from a multicenter image bank, representing various clinical scenarios (different age, gender, curve type, BMI, and pre- and postoperative images). The 12 observers measured the photographs at two different times with a three-week interval. For the second round, the images were randomly mixed. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities of the measurements were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and reliability was measured by the standard error of measurement (SEM). Group comparisons were made using Student's t-test. Results: The mean inter-observer ICC for the ten measurements was 0.981, the mean intra-observer ICC was 0.937, and SEM was 0.3-1.3°. The parameter with the strongest inter- and intra-observer validity was the difference in waistline angles 0.994 and 0.974, respectively, while the highest variability was found with the waist height angle 0.963 and 0.845, respectively. No test-retest differences (p > 0.05) were observed between researchers (0.948 ± 0.04) and surgeons (0.925 ± 0.05). Conclusion: We developed a new digital tool integrated into an online platform demonstrating excellent reliability and inter- and intra-observer variabilities for quantifying body asymmetry in scoliosis patients from a simple clinical photograph. The method could be used for assessing and monitoring scoliosis and body asymmetry without radiation.

Development and psychometric evaluation of uncertainty about disease and treatment scale in hemodialysis patients: a sequential-exploratory mixed-method study

Background and objectiveThe need for long-term treatment and frequent visits to treatment centers for hemodialysis can lead to psychological problems such as Uncertainty about Disease and Treatment (UC about D&T) in patients with chronic kidney failure. In order to understand uncertainty about disease and treatment and to plan for preventive measures and care interventions in various dimensions, there is a need for reliable and valid tools. The present study was conducted to design and psychometrically evaluate the Uncertainty about Disease and Treatment Scale (UC about D&TS) in patients undergoing hemodialysis.MethodsThis study is of a methodological type and conducted in two stages. The first stage included a deductive (literature review) and an inductive approach (face-to-face interviews). In the second stage, psychometric indices of the UC about D&TS, including face validity (qualitative-quantitative), content validity (qualitative-quantitative), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis), and reliability (using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega) were examined.ResultsIn the literature review stage, 66 items were extracted, and in the qualitative stage, 48 items were extracted. After merging similar items, 29 items were entered into the psychometric process. No items were removed in the face and content validity stages. In the construct validity stage, five factors were extracted, including self-uncertainty, uncertain situation, uncertain future, uncertainty of treatment outcomes, and information uncertainty, which constituted a total of 82.16% of the total variance. In this stage, five items were removed from the study due to a corrected item-total correlation below 0.32, and four items were removed due to cross-loading. The α and Ω were calculated as 0.828 and 0.818, respectively. The measurement stability and standard error of measurement were estimated at 0.977 and 2.019, respectively.ConclusionThe results showed that the UC about D&TS is a valid and reliable measure for patients undergoing hemodialysis. This scale is specifically designed to measure UC about D&T in hemodialysis patients, and it is recommended that healthcare providers (Hcps) use this scale in follow-up visits.

Reliability and measurement error of a maximal voluntary toe plantarflexion measurement process

Despite the growing interest, information regarding the psychometric properties of maximal voluntary isometric toe plantarflexion force and rate of force development (RFD) is lacking. Hence, we investigate the test-retest reliability and measurement error of these outcome measurement instruments measured with a custom-built dynamometer. Twenty-six healthy adults participated in a crossed design with four sessions separated by 5–7 days. RFD was quantified using manual onset and calculating the impulse and the slope in the following time windows: 0–50 ms, 0–100 ms, 0–150 ms, 0–200 ms, 0–250 ms. We estimated the systematic bias of the mean, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) from the agreement and consistency models. The ICC and the SEM agreement for maximal voluntary isometric toe plantarflexion force along the perpendicular axis were respectively 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76, 0.93) and 27 N (22, 32), while along the resultant of the perpendicular and anterior posterior axis they were 0.85 (0.73, 0.92) and 29 N (23, 35). The results of the consistency model were similar as the estimated variance for session was closer to zero. A systematic bias of the mean between session 1 and 3 was found. For the RFD variables, the ICC agreement ranged from 0.35 to 0.65. The measurement process was found to be reliable to assess maximal voluntary isometric toe plantarflexion force but not RFD. However, a familiarization session is mandatory and these results need to be confirmed in less coordinated (e.g. aging population) individuals.

Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: a systematic review psychometrics properties using the COSMIN.

Psychometrical evaluation of persons of diverse contexts and different populations, including general or clinical. This review study aimed to evaluate the psychometrics quality of resilience scales. International and Iranian databases were searched with MESH terms, including "psychometric", "validity", "reliability", "Connor-Davidson resilience scale", "Resilience scale", for published articles up to 1 February 2023. For each of the selected studies, the risk of bias was evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist. Then the COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the entire text of the article for methodological quality. Considering the inclusion criteria, 80 documents were evaluated. According to the COSMIN's criteria for evaluating the risk of bias, the current study findings revealed the included studies' limitations in assessing the three versions of CD-RISC cross-cultural and content validity as well as their stability (e.g. conducting test re-test), whereas the majority of psychometric studies of CD-RISC-25, and CD-RISC-2 rated as very good or adequate in terms of structural validity. In terms of quality assessment of the included studies, the current study indicated that investigating the structural validity of the CD-RISC was mainly done based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis was absent. The general result indicates the acceptability of the quality of the studies. However, concerns for measurement properties such as responsiveness and criterion validity as well as the standard error of measurement have been neglected.

Psychometric properties of the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) in subjects with frozen shoulder: a reliability and validity study

BackgroundFrozen Shoulder (FS) is a painful condition characterized by severe pain and progressive restriction of shoulder movement, leading to functional impairment and reduced quality of life. While different Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) tools exist for assessing shoulder diseases, few specific PROMs are validated for FS patients.PurposeThis study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire in FS patients.MethodsOne hundred and twenty-four subjects (mean ± SD age = 55.4 ± 7.9 years; 55.6% female) diagnosed with FS were included and completed the DASH questionnaire, the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Floor or ceiling effects were investigated. Structural validity was analysed through a unidimensional Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), internal consistency through Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest reliability through the Intraclass Correlation coefficient (ICC), measurement error through the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and the Minimum Detectable Change (MDC), and construct validity through the hypothesis testing with the correlation with the other outcome measures used.ResultsNo floor or ceiling effects were observed. CFA confirmed a one-factor structure after addressing local item dependency (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.055; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.077; Comparative Fit Index = 0.970; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.968). Cronbach’s alpha was high (= 0.951), and test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.999; 95% CI: 0.998-1.000). SEM was equal to 0.5 points, and MDC to 1.5 points. Construct validity was considered satisfactory as 80% of the a-priori hypotheses were met.ConclusionThe DASH questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties in FS patients, supporting its use as a valuable tool for assessing the impact of FS in clinical and research settings.

Reliability in Novel Field-Based Fitness Measurements and Postexercise Scores from a Physical Fitness Test Battery in Older Adults

Introduction: Physical fitness is strongly associated with daily physical function, health, and longevity in older adults. Field-based tests may provide a reasonable alternative compared to advanced laboratory testing. Separating postexercise test scores from reactivity measurements requires sufficient test-retest reliability. Postexercise test scores with reliability analyses of field-based fitness tests in older adults are lacking. The present study aimed to examine the test-retest reliability of some novel easily accommodated fitness test measurements and compare pretest scores with postexercise results in these tests along with other field-based fitness tests in older adults. Methods: Totally 1,407 community-dwelling older adults (69% female), x̄ = 71.5 ± 5.0 (65–84 years), performed twelve field-based fitness tests at pretest 1, pretest 2 and a posttest after an 8-week exercise period (twice weekly 1 h of combined strength and aerobic training). T tests, intra-class correlation, limits of agreement, standard error of measurement, and coefficient of variance were performed between pre-1 and pre-2 tests, and repeated measures ANOVA and partial eta squared effect size for postexercise differences for men and women in 5-year age groups ranging from 65 to 84 years. Results: Between pre-1 and pre-2 tests a significant difference was noted in some of the novel fitness test measurements but generally not, e.g., in isometric trunk flexion and step-up height on either leg among all sex and age groups. In most of these novel fitness test measurements, no significant differences occurred between the two pretests. Examples of results from the pre-2 test to the posttest were isometric trunk flexion 45° endurance and isometric trunk extension endurance improved significantly for both sexes in age groups 65–74 years. Women, but not men, improved the maximal step-up height for both legs in most age groups. The speed in the 50 sit-to-stand improved significantly for most age groups in both sexes. Six-min walk distance improved significantly for most age groups in women but among men only in 65–69 years. In the timed-up-and-go test, significant improvements were seen for all age groups in women and in men 70–79 years. No postexercise improvements were generally observed for grip strength or balance. Conclusions: In most of the novel fitness test measures, no significant difference was noted between the two pretests in the assessed sex and age groups. Results after the 8-week exercise period varied between sex and age groups, with significant improvements in several of the twelve studied fitness tests. These findings may be valuable for future projects utilizing easily accommodated physical fitness tests in older adults.

The Reliability of the Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging Method for Assessing Pelvic Floor Muscles Function in Pregnant Women

Background: To our knowledge, there is scant research on the use of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) method for evaluating bladder base displacement in pregnant women. The RUSI is a non-invasive and simple method that assesses the function of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) based on the movement of the bladder base. Objectives: This study aims to assess the reliability of the RUSI for the assessment of PFM function in pregnant women during voluntary muscle contractions. Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 18 pregnant women with different gestational ages participated. The amount of bladder base displacement during PFM contraction was assessed in all women and considered an indicator of PFM function. The test re-test reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. The percentages of standard error of measurement (SEM%) and minimal detectable change (MDC%) were also calculated. Results: The mean amount of bladder base displacement during PFM contraction at time points 1 and 2 was 4.89±1.43 and 4.81±1.41, respectively. The ICC was 0.989 (95% CI, 0.969%, 0.996%), which indicates excellent reliability. The Bland-Altman plot showed that all the points were within the 95% limits of agreement with no considerable trend or bias. The SEM% and MDC% were 3.09% and 8.41%, respectively. Conclusion: The intra-rater reliability of the RUSI to assess PFM function in pregnant women is high, and can be useful for further studies on the PFMs in pregnant women.

Developing a Computer Vision Model to Automate Quantitative Measurement of Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients

BackgroundIncreasing deformity of the lower extremities, as measured by the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), is associated with poor patient outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA). Automated calculation of HKAA is imperative to reduce the burden on orthopaedic surgeons. We proposed a detection-based deep learning (DL) model to calculate HKAA in THA and TKA patients and assessed the agreement between DL-derived HKAAs and manual measurement. MethodsWe retrospectively identified 1,379 long-leg radiographs (LLRs) from patients scheduled for THA or TKA within an academic medical center. There were 1,221 LLRs used to develop the model (randomly split into 70% training, 20% validation, and 10% held-out test sets); 158 LLRs were considered “difficult,” as the femoral head was difficult to distinguish from surrounding tissue. There were 2 raters who annotated the HKAA of both lower extremities, and inter-rater reliability was calculated to compare the DL-derived HKAAs with manual measurement within the test set. ResultsThe DL model achieved a mean average precision of 0.985 on the test set. The average HKAA of the operative leg was 173.05 ± 4.54°; the nonoperative leg was 175.55 ± 3.56°. The inter-rater reliability between manual and DL-derived HKAA measurements on the operative leg and nonoperative leg indicated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation (2,k) = 0.987 [0.96, 0.99], intraclass correlation (2, k) = 0.987 [0.98, 0.99, respectively]). The standard error of measurement for the DL-derived HKAA for the operative and nonoperative legs was 0.515° and 0.403°, respectively. ConclusionsA detection-based DL algorithm can calculate the HKAA in LLRs and is comparable to that calculated by manual measurement. The algorithm can detect the bilateral femoral head, knee, and ankle joints with high precision, even in patients where the femoral head is difficult to visualize.

Defining tibial anterior muscle morphology in first-ever chronic stroke patients using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound

ABSTRACT Background Drop foot is common post-stroke, elevating fall risks and mobility limitations. It is caused by weakness and lack of control of the tibialis anterior muscle (TA), for which various rehabilitation treatments are used. A reliable objective estimate of changes in TA muscle morphology and composition can enhance treatment optimization. Objectives We aimed to ascertain 3D freehand ultrasound (3DfUS) reliability in measuring TA muscle volume, length, and echo intensity in stroke patients and healthy controls and its validity by comparing these features across legs, between patients and controls, and between clinical subgroups (i.e. patients with and without ankle contracture, spastic muscle overactivity, and foot dorsiflexor paresis). Methods We included 9 stroke patients and 9 healthy controls to define reliability and 26 stroke patients and 28 healthy controls to define validity. For reliability, data were collected and processed by 2 different operators and processors. For inter- and intra-rater reliability, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used. For validity, Wilcoxon-Signed-Ranked and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparisons between groups and subgroups. Results All measurements showed good to excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.816 to 0.997, SEM: 0.5% to 7.8%). Comparison analyses revealed no differences in muscle features among legs, groups, or subgroups. Conclusion While the 3DfUS is a reliable method to define TA morphology and composition, its clinical validity needs further investigation into factors influencing muscle property changes across various age groups and post-stroke time points. MeSH terms Stroke; Skeletal muscle morphology; muscle composition; 3D freehand ultrasonography, Anterior Tibial Muscle

Inter-rater reliability of a new instrument for measuring isometric strength of toe flexor muscle

The assessment of toe flexor muscle strength is an important factor in the analysis of the muscles that contribute to sustaining the longitudinal plantar arch. Intrinsic muscles have several functions such as providing support and stabilization to the arches of the foot, shock absorption, and rigidity for the transmission of forces and postural stability. Objective: To evaluate the reliability of a device to measure the isometric strength of the toe flexor muscles individually. Method: Methodological study with a quantitative approach to assess the reliability of the instrument for evaluating the maximum voluntary isometric strength of the flexor muscles of the toes individually. 20 feet of healthy volunteers were evaluated in two moments: initial evaluation performed by evaluator 1 and evaluation after one week performed by evaluator 2, to test the interclass reliability through the statistical test of Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Results: The results showed excellent ICC in all toes with values ranging between 0.805 and 0.921. Toe 4 had the lowest standard error of measurement (SME) and minimal detectable change (MMD), demonstrating lower collection error and greater sensitivity. Conclusion: The proposed instrument is reliable for measuring the intrinsic flexor muscle strength of the foot, being an alternative for evaluating it in different populations, as it presents good reliability and reproducibility at an affordable cost, and can be used in future clinical studies and clinical practice.

The Sprint Mechanics Assessment Score: A Qualitative Screening Tool for the In-field Assessment of Sprint Running Mechanics

Background: Qualitative movement screening tools provide a practical method of assessing mechanical patterns associated with potential injury development. Biomechanics play a role in hamstring strain injury and are recommended as a consideration within injury screening and rehabilitation programs. However, no methods are available for the in-field assessment of sprint running mechanics associated with hamstring strain injuries. Purpose: To investigate the intra- and interrater reliability of a novel screening tool assessing in-field sprint running mechanics titled the Sprint Mechanics Assessment Score (S-MAS) and present normative S-MAS data to facilitate the interpretation of performance standards for future assessment uses. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Maximal sprint running trials (35 m) were recorded from 136 elite soccer players using a slow-motion camera. All videos were scored using the S-MAS by a single assessor. Videos from 36 players (18 men and 18 women) were rated by 2 independent assessors blinded to each other's results to establish interrater reliability. One assessor scored all videos in a randomized order 1 week later to establish intrarater reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on single measures using a 2-way mixed-effects model, with absolute agreement with 95% CI and kappa coefficients with percentage agreements, were used to assess the reliability of the overall score and individual score items, respectively. T-scores were calculated from the means and standard deviations of the male and female groups to present normative data values. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to assess between-sex differences and between-limb differences, respectively. Results: The S-MAS showed good intrarater (ICC, 0.828 [95% CI, 0.688-0.908]) and interrater (ICC, 0.799 [95% CI, 0.642-0.892]) reliability, with a standard error of measurement of 1 point. Kappa coefficients for individual score items demonstrated moderate to substantial intra- and interrater agreement for most parameters, with percentage agreements ranging from 75% to 88.8% for intrarater and 66.6% to 88.8% for interrater reliability. No significant sex differences were observed for overall scores, with mean values of 4.2 and 3.8 for men and women, respectively (P = .27). Conclusion: The S-MAS is a new tool developed for assessing sprint running mechanics associated with lower limb injuries in male and female soccer players. The reliable and easy-to-use nature of the S-MAS means that this method can be integrated into practice, potentially aiding future injury screening and research looking to identify athletes who may demonstrate mechanical patterns potentially associated with hamstring strain injuries.

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Video-Based Approach to Assess Physical Function in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis.

The aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity and reliability of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International recommended performance-based tests delivered by video-based in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Thirty-two participants (aged 40 to 70 years; 15 men) undertook assessments of 4 performance-based tests via both video-based (real-time and recorded) and face-to-face approaches, on the same day. Outcome measures were performance-based test and the number of technical issues encountered. The performance-based tests included the 40-Meter Fast-Paced Walk Test (velocity, m/s), the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (number of repetitions), the Stair Climb Test (time, seconds), and the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG; time, seconds). The Bland-Altman limit of agreement measures, standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), minimal detectable changes (MDCs), and bias (mean difference) were employed to analyse the concurrent validity between video-based and face-to-face approaches of the performance-based tests. Reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), CV, and SEM. A high degree of concurrent validity for the TUG (bias = -0.22), the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (bias = -0.22), the Stair Climb Test (bias = -0.31), and the 40-Meter Fast-Paced Walk Test (bias = -0.06) was found. SEM and CV values were within the acceptable level for concurrent validity. There was a high degree of reliability demonstrated for all tests analysed. ICC measures ranged from 0.95 to 1.00 for intrarater reliability, and from 0.95 to 0.99 for interrater reliability. Video-based assessment of physical performance tests is a valid and reliable tool for measuring physical function among adults with knee osteoarthritis via Microsoft Teams (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA, USA). Video-based assessment is a promising public health tool to measure physical function in adults with knee osteoarthritis.

The Reliability of 44-Item Big Five Personality Inventory (Malay Version) to Measure Readiness to Breastfeed

The 44-item Big Five Personality Inventory (BFI-44) helps in simplify a wide range of complex personality features, including how personality affects breastfeeding. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the Malay version of the BFI-44. A cross-sectional study was conducted using the convenience sampling of female respondents. A total of 96 female public university students participated in this study. Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient, limit of agreement, and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used in determining the reliability of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha value for Extraversion subscale obtained the highest internal consistency (0.723) and the lowest internal consistency was obtained in the subscale of Openness to Experience (0.543). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value for all dimensions exceeded 0.70 (ICC= 0.792-0.883). The Bland-Altman plots showed high reliability in all dimensions except Neuroticism. For SEM, Extraversion scored the lowest (0.773) while Neuroticism scored the highest (1.199). Overall, the BFI-44 in Malay version had moderate to good internal consistency and igh test-retest reliability. These findings may give positive implications for the implementation of the questionnaire in future evaluation of Malaysians’ personality traits

Long-Acting and Permanent Family Planning Methods Attitude Scale: The Instrument Development and Cross-Sectional Validation Study.

Background and Purpose: This study aims to develop and validate a tool to measure women's attitudes toward long-acting and permanent family planning methods (LAPMs). Methods: Participants were 500 women of childbearing age who were 18 years of age or older and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. The study was carried out in two phases: instrument development and psychometric testing. After a comprehensive literature review, 30 preitems of the scale were created. Item analysis was performed using adjusted item-total correlations. Factor analyses were performed to confirm construct validity. Cronbach's alpha, standard error of measurement, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess reliability. Results: The analyses revealed that the eight-item, three-factor structure had acceptable fit values. The Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was found to be .73. The ICC value was .997. Conclusions: The scale is a valid and reliable tool used to assess women's attitudes toward LAPMs.

The minimal important difference and smallest detectable change of the Oxford elbow score, Quick disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand and single assessment numeric evaluation used for elbow trauma

BackgroundThe Minimal Important Difference (MID) and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) are methods used to identify the smallest changes in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) that are of relevance to the patients. Data on these parameters is, however, limited for elbow conditions including traumatic injuries. The aim of this study was therefore to estimate the MID and SDC for three commonly used PROMs after elbow trauma; the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Material and methodsOne hundred patients, 67 females, aged ≥18 years (mean age 52.4 years (SD, 18.2)), who had sustained a fracture, tendon rupture or dislocation affecting the elbow, completed the OES, QuickDASH, and SANE 3-5 months after injury (T1) and again after a minimum of 3 weeks (T2). A transition item with a 7-level scale, enquiring about the situation with the elbow, was also completed at T1 and T2. The difference in scores between T1 and T2 was calculated (change scores). The MID was assessed using the mean change method; a response of “slightly better” or “slightly worse” was defined as being a clinically significant change. The SDC was estimated by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) based on 2 administrations (1- to 3-week interval) of PROMs in a separate group of patients who had sustained an elbow injury 1 to 2 years previously. ResultsThe most common diagnosis was fracture of the proximal radius (n = 33). Eighteen patients responded slightly better and 5 slightly worse on the transition item and had mean change scores of 7.9 (9.3) for the OES and -7.4 (11.4) for the QuickDASH. Assessment of SDC was based on 56 patients having sustained an elbow injury between September 2019 and October 2020. The SDC was: 12.1 for the OES, 11.4 for the QuickDASH and 1.94 for the SANE. ConclusionChange scores need to exceed 12.1 points for the OES, 11.4 points for the QuickDASH and 1.94 points for the SANE in order to measure change with clinical relevance and not due to measurement errors.

Toward subtalar joint axis-driven computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing foot orthoses: Reliability of a noninvasive clinical scanning protocol.

The subtalar joint axis (STJA) occupies a key role in the dynamics of the lower limb kinetic chain, and its location has a wide interindividual variability. It has been suggested that considering the STJA location when designing foot orthoses may help to apply the required mechanical dose. However, the evidence is more anecdotal than empirical. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the STJA digitization, a procedure combining the clinical determination of the functional STJA location and its subsequent 3-dimensional (3D) scanning. Two examiners identified the posterior and anterior exit points of the functional STJA on the skin of 15 healthy participants using a clinical method in a repeated-measure design. A handheld 3D scanner was used to scan the feet and the skin markers. The 3D coordinates of the skin markers were subsequently quantified and (1) STJA digitization intratester within-session, (2) STJA digitization intratester between-session, and (3) STJA digitization intertester between-session reliabilities were evaluated. When pooling all skin marker 3D coordinates, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the STJA intratester within-session reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.98. ICCs for the STJA digitization intratester between-session reliability ranged from 0.58 to 0.94. ICCs for the STJA digitization intertester reliability ranged from 0.56 to 0.81. Standard error of measurement for the mediolateral position of the talus marker (anterior exit point of the STJA) was substantially higher than that for the other coordinates. Overall, the STJA digitization demonstrated a good intratester between-session reliability and may be used in a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing workflow to create foot orthoses. However, further efforts should be considered to improve the scanning process and intertester reliability.

EFAS Score – Validation of Danish Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)

BackgroundThe Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in 13 languages. Currently, the Danish version completed data acquisition and underwent further validation. MethodsThe data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory. ResultsThe internal consistency was confirmed in the Danish version (Cronbach’s Alpha 0.88). The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was 0.31 and is similar to other language versions. Between baseline and follow-up, 77.2% of patients showed an improvement on their EFAS score, with adequate responsiveness (effect size 1.05). ConclusionsThe Danish EFAS Score version was successfully validated in patients with a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.net.

Assessing Motor Variability during Squat: The Reliability of Inertial Devices in Resistance Training.

Movement control can be an indicator of how challenging a task is for the athlete, and can provide useful information to improve training efficiency and prevent injuries. This study was carried out to determine whether inertial measurement units (IMU) can provide reliable information on motion variability during strength exercises, focusing on the squat. Sixty-six healthy, strength-trained young adults completed a two-day protocol, where the variability in the squat movement was analyzed at two different loads (30% and 70% of one repetition maximum) using inertial measurement units and a force platform. The time series from IMUs and force platforms were analyzed using linear (standard deviation) and non-linear (detrended fluctuation analysis, sample entropy and fuzzy entropy) measures. Reliability was analyzed for both IMU and force platform using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement. Standard deviation, detrended fluctuation analysis, sample entropy, and fuzzy entropy from the IMUs time series showed moderate to good reliability values (ICC: 0.50-0.85) and an acceptable error. The study concludes that IMUs are reliable tools for analyzing movement variability in strength exercises, providing accessible options for performance monitoring and training optimization. These findings have implications for the design of more effective strength training programs, emphasizing the importance of movement control in enhancing athletic performance and reducing injury risks.