Standard D2 Research Articles

Extent of Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Management of Right-Sided Colon Cancer: The Randomized Phase III RELARC Trial.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being increasingly used for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, although there is still no strong evidence that CME provides better long-term oncological outcomes than D2 dissection. The controversy is mainly regarding the survival benefit from extended lymph node dissection emphasized by CME. This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02619942) was performed across 17 hospitals in China. Patients diagnosed with stage T2-T4aNanyM0 or TanyN + M0 right-sided colon cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. The primary outcome was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS). Between January 11, 2016, and December 26, 2019, 1,072 patients were randomly assigned (536 patients to CME and 536 patients to D2 dissection). In total, 995 patients (median age 61 years, 59% male) were included in the primary analysis (CME [n = 495] v D2 dissection [n = 500]). No significant differences were found between the groups in 3-year DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.02]; P = .06; 86.1% in the CME group v 81.9% in the D2 group) or in 3-year OS (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.43 to 1.16]; P = .17; 94.7% in the CME group v 92.6% in the D2 group). This trial failed to find evidence of superior DFS outcome for CME compared with standard D2 lymph node dissection in primary surgical excision of right-sided colon cancer. Standard D2 dissection should be the routine procedure for these patients. CME should only be considered in patients with obvious mesocolic lymph node involvement.

Gastrointestinal functions after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial on effects of abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis, and D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision

PurposeRoutine use of abdominal drain or prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is no longer part of current clinical practice in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA), it may reduce perioperative abdominal contamination. Furthermore, in cancer patients, prolonged surgery with extensive dissection such as central vascular ligation and complete mesocolon excision with D3 lymphadenectomy (altogether radical right colectomy RRC) is called responsible for affecting postoperative ileus. The aim was to evaluate postoperative resumption of gastrointestinal functions in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA and standard D2 dissection or RRC, with or without abdominal drain and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis.MethodsMonocentric factorial parallel arm randomized pilot trial including all consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and ICA for cancer, in 20 months. Patients were randomized on a 1:1:1 ratio to receive abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis or neither (I level), and 1:1 to receive RRC or D2 colectomy (II level). Patients were not blinded. The primary aim was the resumption of gastrointestinal functions (time to first gas and stool, time to tolerated fluids and food). Secondary aims were length of stay and complications’ rate. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04977882.ResultsFifty-seven patients were screened; according to sample size, 36 were randomized, 12 for each arm for postoperative management, and 18 for each arm according to surgical techniques. A difference in time to solid diet favored the group without drain or antibiotic independently from standard or RRC. Furthermore, when patients were divided with respect to surgical technique and into matched cohorts, no differences were seen for primary and secondary outcomes.ConclusionAbdominal drainage and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA seem to negatively affect the resumption of a solid diet after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with ICA for cancer. RRC does not seem to influence gastrointestinal function recovery.

Extent of lymphadenectomy for surgical management of right-sided colon cancer: Multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled trial.

3575 Background: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being increasingly used for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer although there is still no strong evidence that CME provides better long-term oncological outcomes than D2 dissection. The controversy is mainly regarding the survival benefit from extended lymph node dissection emphasized by CME. Methods: This randomized, controlled, unblinded, phase 3, superiority trial involved 17 hospitals in China. Totally 1,072 patients diagnosed with stage T2-T4aNanyM0 or TanyN+M0 right-sided colon cancer were enrolled from January 11, 2016, through December 26, 2019. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to undergo either CME (n=536) or D2 dissection (n=536) during laparoscopic right colectomy. The primary outcome was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS). Results: Among 1072 patients, 77 were excluded after randomization. The remaining 995 patients (median age 61years, 59% male) were included in the primary analysis (CME [n=495] vs. D2 dissection [n=500]). The 3-year primary outcome assessment was completed for 97% patients. No significant differences were found between the groups in 3-year DFS (86.1% in CME group vs. 81.9% in D2 group; HR = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-1.02; P = 0.06) or in 3-year OS (94.7% in CME group vs. 92.6% in D2 group; HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.43-1.16; P = 0.17). Conclusions: For primary surgical excision of right-sided colon cancer, complete mesocolic excision did not improve disease free survival, compared to standard D2 lymph node dissection. Standard D2 dissection should be the routine procedure for these patients. CME should only be considered in patients with obvious mesocolic lymph node involvement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02619942. Clinical trial information: NCT02619942 .

Laparoscopic D2+ lymph node dissection in patients with obesity and gastric cancer: A retrospective study.

D2 lymph node dissection is widely used in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and its efficacy and safety are known for patients with obesity. Currently, D2+ lymph node dissection is also applied to certain patients with gastric cancer of later stages. Due to the high difficulty of D2+ surgery, it is more challenging to perform on patients with obesity. There is currently limited research on the efficacy and safety of D2+ surgery in obese patients with gastric cancer. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer admitted to a single gastroenterology department. Patients with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were included in the study. A total of 149 patients were selected as the research subjects and divided into two groups. The observation group comprised 74 patients who underwent D2+ lymph node dissection, while the control group comprised 75 patients who underwent standard D2 lymph node dissection. The surgical performance, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. The results showed that the rates of conversion to open surgery in the D2+ and D2 groups were 5.4% (4/74) and 2.7% (2/75), respectively, and were not significantly different. The duration of surgery in the D2+ group (282.55±23.02 min) was significantly longer than that in the D2 group (271.45±20.05 min). The mean number of lymph node dissections in the D2+ group was 28.57±7.19, which was significantly higher than that in the D2 group (25.29±6.41). No statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus, postoperative hospitalization days, total hospitalization expenses or postoperative complications was detected between the two groups. There were no deaths in either group within the 30-day perioperative period. In addition, there was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival rate between the two groups, while the 5-year overall survival rate of the D2+ group was significantly higher than that of the D2 group. For obese patients with gastric cancer, D2+ surgery may increase the duration of surgery and slightly increase intraoperative blood loss compared with standard D2 radical surgery, but does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Moreover, D2+ surgery increases the number of lymph node dissections and improves the 5-year survival rate of patients. Therefore, it may be concluded that laparoscopic D2+ lymph node dissection is safe and feasible for obese patients with gastric cancer.

Short-Term Outcomes after D2 Gastrectomy with Complete Mesogastric Excision in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Studies.

Complete mesogastric excision (CME) has been advocated to allow for a more extensive retrieval of lymph nodes, as well as lowering loco-regional recurrence rates. This study aims to analyze the short-term outcomes of D2 radical gastrectomy with CME compared to standard D2 gastrectomy. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Cochrane recommendations until 2 July 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023443361). The primary outcome, expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), was the number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs). Meta-analyses of means and binary outcomes were developed using random effects models to assess heterogeneity. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed with the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. There were 13 studies involving 2009 patients that were included, revealing a significantly higher mean number of harvested LNs in the CME group (MD: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.25-4.86; 95%; p = 0.033). The CME group also experienced significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, a lower length of stay, and a shorter operative time. Three studies showed a serious risk of bias, and between-study heterogeneity was mostly moderate or high. Radical gastrectomy with CME may offer a safe and more radical lymphadenectomy, but long-term outcomes and the applicability of this technique in the West are still to be proven.

Risk evaluation of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis and survival analysis of patients with advanced gastric cancer

Abstract Background There is no consensus regarding the influence of prophylactic no. 10 lymph node (LN) dissection in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to evaluate whether patients with AGC could benefit from no. 10 LN dissection and to explore the clinicopathological indicators of no. 10 LN metastasis. Methods We analyzed the data of 218 patients with AGC who underwent standard D2 lymphadenectomy (SD2; n = 108) or modified D2 lymphadenectomy (MD2; n = 110) between January 2017 and January 2021. In addition, we examined factors influencing no. 10 LN metastasis in the SD2 group. Results Differentiation, tumor location, and no. 4 positive LNs were significantly correlated with no. 10 LN metastasis (P < 0.05). Borrmann classification, differentiation, depth of invasion, LN metastasis (N), and tumor size were found to correlate with survival in univariate analyses. Age, sex, extent of gastrectomy, tumor location, and extent of lymphadenectomy were not associated with survival (P > 0.05). The median survival times were 72.23 and 68.56 months for the SD2 and MD2 groups, respectively (P = 0.635). Postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates were 37.96% and 3.70% in the SD2 group, and 23.64% and 1.82% in the MD2 group, respectively. Conclusions Based on our findings, prophylactic no. 10 lymphadenectomy may be recommended in patients with AGC who exhibit positive no. 4 LN status, poor differentiation, and tumors located on the greater curvature.

Impact of tumor stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched study in a western center

BackgroundThe use of indocyanine green fluorescence has been shown to be a safe and effective method for improving lymph node retrieval in patients with gastric cancer. However, previous studies have focused on early-stage tumors and/or the Asian population and excluded patients who received neoadjuvant treatment. MethodsIn this study, 142 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy at a Spanish hospital between January 2017 and December 2022. Of these, 42 patients received preoperative indocyanine green injection to guide lymphadenectomy. Their outcomes were compared to a retrospective cohort of 42 patients after 1:1 propensity score matching. ResultsThe feasibility of indocyanine green lymphatic mapping was 95.5%. No complications associated with indocyanine green injection were observed. The indocyanine green group had a significantly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes than the non-indocyanine green group (32.67 vs 25.14; P = .013). This statistically significant difference was maintained across subgroups of neoadjuvant treatment, non-obese patients, pT0 to 2 stage, and pN0 stage. In 47.6% of patients from the indocyanine green group, lymphadenectomy was extended outside the standard D2 dissection area based on indocyanine green uptake, but none of the retrieved lymph nodes were metastatic. There were no differences in postoperative complications and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups. ConclusionIndocyanine green-guided lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible and increases the number of retrieved lymph nodes compared to conventional lymphatic dissection, as well as in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of indocyanine green should be routine if available for guiding lymph node dissection in gastric cancer, regardless of tumor stage or previous neoadjuvant treatment. However, further studies are needed to determine the impact of this technique on disease-free and overall survival.

Impact of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging on Lymphadenectomy Quality During Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (Greeneye): An Adaptative, Phase 2, Clinical Trial

BackgroundIndocyanine green (ICG)-guided lymphadenectomy using near-infrared visualization (NIR) may increase nodal yield during gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of NIR visualization on the quality of D2 lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.MethodsThis single-arm, open-label, Simon’s two-stage, adaptive, phase 2 trial included patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic peritumoral injection of ICG was performed 24 ± 6 h before surgery. Intraoperatively, after standard D2 lymphadenectomy and specimen extraction, NIR was used for eventual completion lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit of NIR (i.e., at least one additional harvested station containing lymph nodes, with negative points for every harvested station with no lymph nodes at final pathology).ResultsWe enrolled 18 patients (61% female, median age 69 years). With NIR, an extra 23 stations were harvested: 9 contained no lymph nodes, 12 contained nonmetastatic lymph nodes, and 2 contained metastatic lymph nodes. The most commonly visualized station with NIR were station 6 (8 patients) and 1 (4 patients). The total number of harvested nodes per patient was 32 (interquartile range [IQR] 26–41), with a median of 1 (IQR 0–1) additional lymph node after NIR. Overall, seven (39%) patients had a clinical benefit from NIR, of which two (11%) had one metastatic lymph node harvested with NIR.ConclusionsNIR visualization improves the quality of D2 lymphadenectomy in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Considering the limited improve in the number of harvested lymph nodes, its real oncological benefit is still questionable.

A multicenter randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy with or without prophylactic supraclavicular node dissection: a phase 3 trial (JCOG2013, MODERN3)

Abstract The need for prophylactic supraclavicular lymph node dissection during esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy remains controversial. A randomized phase III trial was launched in August 2022 to confirm the non-inferiority of esophagectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy except for supraclavicular lymph node dissection to standard D2 lymphadenectomy in terms of overall survival for patients with resectable upper or middle thoracic esophageal cancer. This study will enroll 480 patients from 54 Japanese institutions over 5 years. The primary endpoint includes overall survival, and the secondary endpoints include relapse-free survival, perioperative and late complication incidences, supraclavicular lymph node recurrence, salvage cervical treatment incidence, synchronous cervical and abdominal procedure proportion, operation time and the number of operating surgeons. This trial has been registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials under study number jRCT1030220248.

Subserosal Indocyanine Green Plus Submucosal Carbon Nanoparticle Navigated Laparoscopic Gastrectomy (DANCE-01): a Cohort Study

BackgroundIndocyanine green (ICG) and carbon nanoparticle (CN) have been widely used for radical gastrectomy. However, synchronous application of ICG and CN in gastrectomy has not been tried yet. For the first time, we herein reported a novel strategy using dual tracers in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. MethodsThis is a single-center, single-armed, prospective study. For each qualified patient, submucosal CN was injected the day before surgery, and subserosal ICG was injected immediately before surgery. Standard D2 laparoscopic gastrectomy and lymph node examination were subsequently performed. Demographics, lymph nodes (LNs) and postoperative outcome were collected for analysis. To analyze the safety and efficacy of this novel strategy, two contemporary historic control groups using single tracer were established. ResultsA total of 60 patients underwent dual tracer laparoscopic gastrectomy and were divided into distal (n = 41) and total (n = 19) groups. An average of 53.3 and 62.2 LNs was harvested from two groups, respectively. The average operation duration was 213.3 and 250.0 min, and intra-operative blood loss was 100.2 ml and 94.7 ml. None received combined organ resection. Margin negativity and R0 resection were achieved in all patients. Three (7.3%) complications occurred in distal group. None required second operation or deceased. Postoperative hospitalization was 9.7 and 9.6 days, respectively. Compared to single tracer, more LNs (p < 0.01), shorter operation time (p < 0.01), less blood lost (p < 0.01) and accelerated postoperative recovery (p < 0.01) were observed in dual tracer group. ConclusionsWe propose a novel, feasible and safe tracing strategy for laparoscopic gastrectomy. Clinical Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100051309).

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcome of resectable gastric cancer patients with small para-aortic lymph node.

Resectable gastric cancer (GC) patients with small para-aortic lymph node (smaller than 10mm in diameter, sPAN) were seldom reported, and existing guidelines did not provide definite treatment recommendation for them. A total of 667 consecutive resectable GC patients were enrolled. 98 patients were in the sPAN group, and 569 patients without enlarged para-aortic lymph node were in the nPAN group. Standard D2 lymphadenectomy was performed. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy were administrated according to the cTNM and pTNM stage, respectively. Clinicopathological features and prognosis were compared between these two groups. The median size of sPAN was 6 (range, 2-9) mm and the distribution was prevalent in No. 16b1. cN stage (p=0.001) was significantly related to the presence of sPAN. sPAN was both independent risk factor for OS (p=0.031) and RFS (p=0.046) of all patients. The prognosis of patients with sPAN was significantly worse than that of patients with nPAN (OS: p=0.008; RFS: p=0.007). Preoperative CEA and CA19-9 were independent risk factors for prognosis of patients with sPAN. Furthermore, patients in the sPAN group with normal CEA and CA19-9 exhibited acceptable prognosis (5-year OS: 67%; RFS: 64%), while those with elevated CEA or CA19-9 suffered significantly poorer prognosis (5-year OS: 17%; RFS: 17%) than patients in the nPAN group (5-year OS: 64%; RFS 62%) (both p < 0.05). Standard D2 lymphadenectomy should be considered a valid approach for GC patients with sPAN associate to normal preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels. Patients with sPAN associated to elevated CEA or CA19-9 levels could benefit from a multimodal approach: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical surgery with D2 plus lymph nodal dissection extended to No. 16 station.

A multicenter randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy with or without prophylactic supraclavicular node dissection: A phase III trial (JCOG2013, MODERN3).

TPS474 Background: Supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLN) have been regarded as regional nodes of thoracic esophageal cancer in Japan and resected along with cervical paraesophageal lymph nodes as a cervical part of the standard three-field dissection, while the involvement of SCLN is regarded as distant metastasis in Western countries. However, there is no clear evidence that supports or rejects prophylactic SCLN dissection. As postoperative SCLN metastasis can often be managed by either surgery or chemoradiotherapy at the time of relapse, routine prophylactic SCLN dissection may not be essential. Here we conduct the clinical trial to confirm the non-inferiority of esophagectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy except for SCLN to standard D2 lymphadenectomy in terms of overall survival (OS) for patients with resectable upper or middle thoracic esophageal cancer. Methods: Eligibility criteria include the followings; upper or middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or basaloid cell carcinoma with clinical stage I, II, III, or IVA (except for T4) based on the 8th UICC-TNM, age 18 to 80, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin plus 5- fluorouracil or docetaxel plus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) is allowed, but preoperative chemoradiotherapy is not allowed. Patients are randomly assigned to the following two arms using the minimization method with a random component to balance institution, clinical stage (Stage I (T1N0M0) versus Stage I (T1N1M0)/II/III/IVA), age (76 or older versus 75 or younger), and tumor location (upper thoracic versus middle thoracic). Patients undergo either esophagectomy with standard D2 dissection (Arm A) or esophagectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy except for SCLN (Arm B). The primary endpoint is OS in all randomized patients. The secondary endpoints are relapse-free survival, the incidence of perioperative and delayed complications, the incidence of SCLN recurrence, the incidence of salvage cervical treatment, the proportion of synchronous cervical and abdominal procedure, and operation time and the number of operating surgeons. A sample size of 456 patients would be required to observe 147 events to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Arm B in terms of OS, with a one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 70%, an accrual period of 5 years, a follow-up period of 3 years, and a non-inferiority margin of 6% at 3-year OS, assuming the expected 3-year OS of Arm A and Arm B are 80% and 81%, respectively. The planned sample size was set at 480 patients (240 patients per arm). This trial was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) as study number jRCT1030220248 and started in August 2022. Clinical trial information: jRCT1030220248 .

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Gastric Cancer

AbstractGastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Indian men and women aged between 15 and 44 years. Most patients present at an advanced stage of disease. Surgically resectable disease usually requires a standard gastric resection and D2 lymphadenectomy. Imaging, especially with computed tomography scan of abdomen as well as thorax, is necessary for localization, nodal mapping, and metastatic workup of gastric cancer. In this review, we discuss current imaging recommendations for gastric carcinoma.

Applicative Limitations of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Assistance to Laparoscopic Lymph Node Dissection in Total Gastrectomy for Cancer.

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence has been recently introduced as a novel imaging technique improving the accuracy of lymph node (LN) dissection in gastric cancer (GC) surgery, although procedure standardization and achievements have not been clearly defined. This study analyzed the feasibility and effectiveness of ICG-guidance for laparoscopic D2-lymphadenectomy during total gastrectomy for cancer. This study retrospectively analyzed a single-center series of patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy for cancer between April 2015 and August 2021. All patients underwent surgery with standard D2 LN dissection. Intraoperative ICG-fluorescence was institutionally implemented in April 2018 and was performed routinely afterward. Primary outcomes were LN harvest and ratio. Secondary endpoints included operative time and subgroup analysis to assess variables potentially affecting LN retrieval. The study population included 102 patients, and ICG-fluorescence was applied in 38 (37.3%). ICG and no-ICG groups presented similar median age, gender proportions, ASA score and comorbidities (age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index), body mass index, and advanced pathological stage. The median of LNs retrieved was significantly higher after the intraoperative ICG-guidance (44 vs. 32; p = 0.004), although this association was not significant after neoadjuvant therapy or among patients with positive LNs. Lymph node ratio and operative time were not significantly impacted by ICG fluorescence. Multivariate analysis identified the ICG-assistance as the only independent determinant for LN harvest (p = 0.029). ICG-guidance contributes to a significantly wider LN retrieval after laparoscopic D2-lymphadenectomy during total gastrectomy for cancer. However, neoadjuvant therapy and positive LN stage appeared to limit the procedural effectiveness to ICG-assisted LN identification.

Comparison of Standard D2 and Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Knowledge on the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy among elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer is limited. This study was designed to compare standard D2 and limited lymphadenectomy for evaluating the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy. We retrospectively reviewed patient's data based on a prospectively collected gastric cancer registry. The inclusion criteria were age above 75 years and histologically confirmed stage II or more advanced gastric cancer. In this study, 103 patients who underwent limited lymph node dissection and 134 patients who underwent standard D2 lymph node dissection were included to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The mean age after PSM was approximately 78 years in both groups. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5.81 ± 0.87 and 5.75 ± 0.76, respectively, and 12.5% of the patients in both groups had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of more than 3. The limited lymphadenectomy group showed a shorter operation time and fewer retrieved lymph. However, other surgical outcomes and pathological data were not significantly different between the groups. No postoperative mortality within 30 days was observed. There were no significant differences in overall complications between the groups. The 3-year overall survival rates of the limited and standard lymphadenectomy groups were 58.3% and 73.6%, respectively. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate of the limited lymphadenectomy group was lower than that of the standard lymphadenectomy group; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Standard D2 lymphadenectomy has better oncological outcomes in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

ASO Visual Abstract: Comparison of Standard D2 and Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

ASO Visual Abstract: Comparison of Standard D2 and Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

Is D2 laparoscopic gastrectomy essential for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer? A propensity score matched analysis

The necessity of the standard D2 gastrectomy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) is controversial because only limited data are available to demonstrate its oncological benefit for them. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of D2 and Non-D2 and to evaluate the survival benefit of D2 laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in elderly patients. We retrospectively identified 865 patients with GC who underwent radical LG at our hospital between 2011 and 2017. Patients aged ≥75 years who were diagnosed with clinical T1N+ or clinical T2-4 were eligible. The primary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate. The confounding factors were minimized using propensity score matching. This study included 119 patients (63 D2 LG and 56 Non-D2 LG), and 52 patients (26 each for D2 LG and Non-D2 LG) were analyzed after matching. Although no significant difference was found in overall major complications (P=1.00), complications tended to occur in the D2 group (D2 vs. Non-D2 =3.9% vs. 0%). No differences in the 3-year OS were noted between the two groups (68.8% vs. 68.8%; HR 1.53, 95% CI: 0.56-3.19). This study demonstrated the possible association between D2 LG and increased complication rate and no survival benefit of D2 LG in elderly patients.

Ex Situ In Vivo Technique of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection in Operable Proximal Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

D2 gastrectomy is the globally accepted standard surgical procedure for operable gastric cancer, and lymph node (LN) dissection is considered as the critical part of radical surgery and closely related to the prognosis. The splenic hilar LN (SHLN) or level 10 are to be removed during standard D2 total gastrectomy. In situ and ex situ spleen-preserving lymphadenectomies have been the most common dissection approaches for SHLNs. No study exists which compares the outcomes of these techniques in Indian population. This study is aimed to analyse the operative outcomes of ex situ in vivo technique of spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection in patients who underwent D2 total gastrectomy for operable proximal gastric cancer in comparison with in situ in vivo technique of splenic hilar lymph node dissection. We reviewed prospectively collected data from 17 patients with operable proximal gastric cancer between September 2016 and April 2019 who underwent D2 total gastrectomy with splenic hilar lymph node dissection and studied the preoperative demographic factors, operative and postoperative outcomes comparing the different operative techniques. Patients with oesophago-gastric junction involvement, direct splenic or other adjacent organ invasion requiring multivisceral resection and gastric stump carcinoma were excluded. Overall, 17 patients underwent D2 total gastrectomy for operable gastric cancer. Mean age of presentation was 54.7 years including 13 males and 4 females. Five patients had middle third and 12 patients had upper third cancer. All patients had splenic hilar nodal clearance as follows: in situ - 14 and ex situ - 3 patients. R0 resection was achieved in all patients. Lymph node harvest tends to be higher with lower operative time and blood loss in patients with ex situ technique compared to in situ technique with similar morbidity. Ex situ in vivo technique of spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection can be considered as both safe and feasible procedure for operable proximal gastric cancer patients in experienced centres to achieve better lymph node yield with no significant increase in morbidity.

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Using Fluorouracil Implants Combined With Radical Resection and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Clinical Study.

BackgroundReducing peritoneal recurrence after radical surgery is an important choice to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has the potential to be a promising treatment strategy. In the present study, we conducted a multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using sustained-release fluorouracil implants plus radical gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy for cTNM stage III gastric cancer.MethodsThe patients were randomized into intraperitoneal chemotherapy group (sustained-release fluorouracil implants administration after standard D2 radical gastrectomy, and followed by XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy) and control group (standard D2 radical gastrectomy, and followed by XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy). A total of 122 patients from three centers were enrolled from September 2015 to February 2017.ResultsOne hundred and two eligible patients completed the treatment course. The median follow-up time was 41.7 months (36.1–52.9 months). The 3-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival of patients in the intraperitoneal chemotherapy group were 43.9% and 49.1%, respectively, which were significantly better than those of the control group, 31.0% and 38.4%. In the intraperitoneal chemotherapy group, the number of cases with peritoneal recurrence was significantly less than that of the control group, 9 cases (17.3%) vs. 19 cases (44.2%). There were neither significant differences between the groups in the incidence of hematogenous metastasis, lymph node metastasis, nor local metastasis.ConclusionFor cTNM stage III gastric cancer, intraoperative sustained-release fluorouracil implants after radical resection combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, could significantly reduce the risk of peritoneal recurrence and prolong PFS.Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier (NCT02269904).

Manual intracorporeal end-to-end invagination ileotransverse anastomosis, own experience

Aim: to evaluate the results of original manual intracorporeal end-to-end invagination ileotransverse anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.Patients and methods: twenty-two patients with right colon cancer were included in the study: 17 females and 5 males aged 53.1±3.4 years. They underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with the standard D2 lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal ileotransverse anastomosis by the original technique. Follow-up period after surgery was 3 months.Results: no conversions to open surgery occurred. The operation time was 120.0±12.5 minutes, the median blood loss was 87.0±5.0 ml. Twenty (90.9%) patients are still under follow-up. The hospital stay was 11.4±2.6 days. There were no intraoperative complications. There were no cases of anastomotic leakage. No mortality occurred. At the time of the follow-up, all the patients are alive. Two (9.1%) patients have dropped out of control.Conclusion: the experience of the first 22 laparoscopic right hemicolectomies with intracorporeal laparoscopic end-to-end invagination ileotransverse anastomosis makes it possible to recommend this reliably safe method.