Standard Balloon Angioplasty Research Articles

Phase 1 study to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of padeliporfin vascular targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) in patients with locally advanced (LA) unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

TPS4204 Background: Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death. Surgery offers the best survival rates however only a minority of patients are eligible. Approximately 15-20% of patients are deemed unresectable due to vascular involvement LA. Conversion of unresectable tumors, due to vascular involvement to resectable, is an unmet clinical need. Methods: A novel approach was developed to destroy the tumor encasing the artery combining padeliporfin, a photosensitive drug, locally activated by laser light illumination. The effectiveness of the strategy was confirmed in an orthotopic mouse model. A proof-of-concept study using 12 non-tumor pigs demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. A phase I dose escalation trial (NCT5918783) will be performed to evaluate the safety and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of laser light dose of padeliporfin VTP. VTP will be delivered through an endovascular fiber integrated in a standard angioplasty balloon. The balloon will be advanced under fluoroscopy to the encased vascular segment of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and inflated. Following IV administration of padeliporfin, it will be activated by the laser light. Part A will be a classic 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the MTD of laser light. The identified MTD will be applied in the Part B for preliminary efficacy evaluation. The primary objectives are to determine safety and MTD and/or recommended phase 2 laser light dose of VTP treatment. Secondary objectives are: rate of surgical conversion; evaluation of the pattern of disease progression (local regional and/or metastatic disease) after VTP based on CT. Standard of care surgery can be performed after 14 days post VTP. Key inclusion criteria: patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed stage III unresectable LA-PDAC in the head/uncinate process of the pancreas, with SMA solid tumor contact ˃180° with measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 and ECOG 0-1. Key exclusion criteria: metastatic disease, other malignancy, photosensitive skin diseases or porphyria, concurrent investigational therapy within past 30 days, medically uncontrolled moderate or severe ascites, previous radiation to pancreas, SMA variants. Recruitment begins in April 2024. Conversion of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer to surgery is a critical unmet need. This phase I trial explores a novel approach to treat the tumor encasement enabling surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT5918783 .

Outcomes and Comparative Analysis of the Initial Results of Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Coated Balloons Alone Versus in Association With Laser-Excimer Atherectomy in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis (INTACT).

Despite improved patency with newer-generation nitinol stents, one-half of patients will require secondary interventions for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The best treatment strategy remains unclear. This study aimed to compare drug-coated balloons (DCBs) used alone or in association with excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) to simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of femoropopliteal-ISR. The INTACT trial is a multicenter, prospective, triple-arm randomized trial conducted across 14 centers from December 2015 to November 2019. Patients Rutherford Class 2-5 with ISR≥70% were followed-up for 18 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrent ISR>70% by duplex ultrasound analysis. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse events (MAEs) defined as death, major amputation, or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Around 134 subjects were randomized to PTA alone (n=41), PTA+DCB (n=43) or PTA+ELA+DCB (n=50). Procedural success was similar (p=.74), as was clinical success (p=.17). The number of recurrent ISR>70% decreased after PTA+ELA+DCB (30.0%; p=.04) and PTA+DCB (30.2%; p=.05) compared to PTA alone (51.2%). Primary patency was higher after PTA+ELA+DCB (log-rank p=.04) and PTA+DCB (log-rank p=.02) compared to PTA alone at 12 months (78.7% and 70.4% vs 61.5%) and 18 months (61.6% and 67.7% vs 37.3%). Freedom from MAEs was lower after PTA+DCB (27.9%) compared to PTA alone (53.7%; p=.02) but did not differ with PTA+ELA+DCB (40.0%). It was primarily driven by TLR; 2 major amputations occurred after PTA+ELA+DCB (4.0%; p=.18). This independent study demonstrated a decrease in recurrent ISR>70% and increase in primary patency up to 18 months after PTA+ELA+DCB and PTA+DCB compared to PTA alone in the treatment of FP-ISR. It did not show an increase in MAEs but could have lacked power. This multicenter, prospective, triple-arm randomized, controlled trial focuses on the results of adjunctive therapies, such as excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) and/or drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in femoropopliteal lesions in 134 patients. It has the originality of being an independent study funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health. This study confirms a significant decrease in recurrent ISR >70% and increase in primary patency up to 18 months after the use of ELA+DCB and DCBs compared to simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR without an increase in major adverse events.

Post-angioplasty remodeling of coronary arteries investigated via a chemo-mechano-biological in silico model

This work presents the application of a chemo-mechano-biological constitutive model of soft tissues for describing tissue inflammatory response to damage in collagen constituents. The material model is implemented into a nonlinear finite element formulation to follow up a coronary standard balloon angioplasty for one year. Numerical results, compared with available in vivo clinical data, show that the model reproduces the temporal dynamics of vessel remodeling associated with subintimal damage. Such dynamics are bimodular, being characterized by an early tissue resorption and lumen enlargement, followed by late tissue growth and vessel constriction. Applicability of the modeling framework in retrospective studies is demonstrated, and future extension towards prospective applications is discussed.

Angioplasty with Sirolimus-coated Balloon: the New Standard in the Treatment of PAD?

Endovascular revascularisation with paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of peripheral artery disease has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option in the femoropopliteal segment. The antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel prevents restenosis. In contrast, in the infra-popliteal segment, the evidence is currently conflicting. However, there is evidence of an increased risk of amputation and mortality from the second year after angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons. This may be due to a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect of paclitaxel. Sirolimus-coated balloons might therefore be an alternative because sirolimus is cytostatic rather than cytotoxic and thus has a wide therapeutic window.Three single-arm pilot studies (50, 25, and 50 patients, respectively) show that angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloons leads to comparable results to those reported from paclitaxel-coated balloons (late lumen loss at 6 months: 0.29mm; primary patency at 12 months: femoropopliteal 79%-82%, infra-popliteal 59%; freedom from target lesion revascularization at 12 months: femoropopliteal 83%-94%, infra-popliteal 86%). Randomised controlled trials comparing standard balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of intermittent claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischaemia are active and are expected to provide efficacy and safety results from mid 2024.This review presents the results of pilot studies on angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloons for the treatment of peripheral artery disease and reviews currently ongoing randomised controlled trials.

Percutaneous approach to residual pulmonary bifurcation stenosis in conotruncal diseases.

Residual stenosis after right ventricle outflow tract surgery represents a major issue to manage in the children and adult patient with conotruncal defects. Despite a detailed multimodality imaging, the anatomy of distal pulmonary trunk and pulmonary artery bifurcation may be challenging in these patients.The aim of this study was to analyse retrospectively the outcome of the percutaneous transcatheter treatment in children with post-surgical stenosis of pulmonary artery bifurcation.We enrolled 39 patients with a median age of 6.0 years. Standard high-pressure balloon dilation was attempted in 33 patients, effective in 5 of them. Pulmonary branch stenting was performed in 10 patients, effective in 6. A kissing balloon approach was chosen in 17 patients (6 after angioplasty or stenting failure), and this technique was effective in 16 cases. Finally, a bifurcation stenting was performed in 10 patients (second step in 9 cases), effective in all the cases. None of the patients approached by kissing balloon needed a bifurcation stenting.In conclusion, standard balloon angioplasty and standard stenting might be ineffective in post-surgical stenosis involving pulmonary artery bifurcation. In this population, kissing balloon or bifurcation stenting, followed by side branch de-jailing, may be more effective in relieving the gradient.

Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Serranator Serration Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Below-the-Knee Artery Occlusive Disease: A Single-Center Subanalysis From the PRELUDE-BTK Prospective Study

Background: Endovascular interventions in infrapopliteal occlusive artery disease are becoming more complex, and this frequently tests the standard method of treatment, plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). The potential that serration angioplasty could produce a more acceptable tibial artery lumen was assessed in this study. Aim: The aim of this single-center subgroup analysis was to compare acute angiographic results after endovascular treatment using the Serranator serration balloon catheter in patients participating in the PRELUDE-BTK trial with POBA of the infrapopliteal arteries. A secondary objective was to assess post-treatment hemodynamic improvements. Methods: Our center enrolled 15 subjects and treated 17 lesions within the multicenter prospective core laboratory–adjudicated PRELUDE-BTK study. A 25 lesions analyzed separately were treated with POBA and then compared with the Serranator subset. In both cohorts, lesions were treated with either plain angioplasty or Serranator as a stand-alone therapy; subsequent methods, such as drug elution technologies, were not used. Acute angiographic results were analyzed by the SynvaCor angiographic core laboratory. To assess volumetric flow rates, data were analyzed with a fluid flow simulation software and compared against Poiseuille’s Law. Results: Final residual stenosis was 17.2%±8.2% in the Serranator group versus 33.7%±15.7% in the POBA group. The mean lumen diameter (MLD) gain for the Serranator group and the POBA group was 1.64±0.41 mm and 1.33±0.63 mm, respectively. The average atmospheric balloon inflation pressure was 5 ATM in the Serranator group versus 9 ATM in the POBA group. Neither group required a bailout stent; however, it was notable that there were significantly more chronic total occlusions (CTOs) treated in the Serranator group at 41.2% versus 12% in the POBA group. Regarding the effectiveness in improving hemodynamic blood flow for non-CTO lesions, the calculated average ratio of post-treatment to pre-treatment flow rates in the Serranator group was 238% than that for the POBA group. For CTO cases where pre-treatment flow rate was zero, final residual stenosis was used as the parameter for comparison. The Serranator group showed a 62% improvement in final residual stenosis over POBA. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of the infrapopliteal arteries by use of the Serranator serration balloon provides a novel and promising method of action compared with standard balloon angioplasty and, thus, may have a leading role in complex below-the-knee arterial lesions. Clinical Impact The Serranator device might help to adequately address issues with conventional routine techniques for the treatment of complex lesions in infrapopliteal arteries in patients with advanced stages of PAD and critical limb ischemia. Integrating modern technologies such as the Serranator balloon catheter into clinical routine is mandatory in order to gain a more favorable outcome in these severely diseased patients and, particularly, to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Efficacy of Coronary Stenting Versus Ballon Angioplasty in Small Coronary Arteries

Background and aim: The most common approach of percutaneous myocardial revascularization is stent placement. In de novo focal lesions found in big native arteries, balloon angioplasty had lower efficacy than coronary stenting. However, the usefulness of stenting in small arteries remains debatable. The purpose study aimed to compare the efficacy of coronary stenting vs. balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries. Patients and Method: This comparative study was carried out on 132 patients with lesion in small coronary arteries (reference diameter <3mm) in the department of Interventional Cardiology, MTI- Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar from 16th January 2021 to 15th July 2022. Patients were arbitrarily assigned to stent implantation and standard balloon angioplasty. Study protocol was approved by research and ethical committee. Each individual provided written informed consent. The rates of clinical event were evaluated within 1 year. Descriptive statistics was carried out in SPSS version 26. Results: Of the total patients, there were 80 (60.6%) male and 52 (39.4%) were females. Both groups were assigned 66 patients and had similar baseline characteristics and angiography data. Based on treatment analysis, the major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and angiographic success rate were similar: 5.2% and 96.8% in coronary stenting versus 5.9% and 92.4% in balloon angioplasty group respectively. About 4.2% patients underwent abrupt closure changes within 30 days. Stenting convened the substantially larger lumen (1.52 mm vs. 1.32 mm, p<0.001) at 6 months and larger post-procedural lumen diameter (2.31 vs. 1.82 mm, p<0.001) as compared to balloon angioplasty. The incidence of restenosis was found 36% and 56% in coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty respectively. The survival rate (event-free) was achieved in 79% and 69% (p=0.021) in coronary stenting and angioplasty respectively. Conclusion: The present study found that optimum balloon angioplasty with preliminary stenting may be a viable therapeutic option for small coronary arteries lesions. Restenosis was found to be 36% and 56% in coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty, respectively. Keywords: Restenosis, Small coronary arteries, Balloon angioplasty, Coronary stenting

Safety and efficacy of drug coated balloon angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic disease

BackgroundDrug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty can provide sustained anti-restenotic efficacy without the limitations of permanent vascular implantation and is presumably ideal for treating intracranial atherosclerotic disease. However, the safety of...

Determinants of Drug-Coated Balloon Failure in Patients Undergoing Femoropopliteal Arterial Intervention

BackgroundDrug-coated balloons (DCB) are frequently used to treat femoropopliteal artery disease. However, patency loss occurs in ≥10% of patients within 12 months posttreatment with poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms. ObjectivesThe authors sought to investigate the determinants of DCB failure in femoropopliteal disease. MethodsData from randomized clinical trials (IN.PACT SFA, MDT-2113 SFA Japan) and 2 prespecified imaging cohorts of the IN.PACT Global Clinical Study were included. Influential procedural characteristics were evaluated by an independent angiographic core laboratory. The primary endpoint was DCB failure (patency loss during follow-up). Additional endpoints were binary restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Multivariable analyses evaluated the clinical, anatomical, and procedural predictors of DCB failure. ResultsIncluded were 557 participants with single lesions and 12-month core laboratory–adjudicated duplex ultrasonography. Key clinical characteristics were as follows: mean age 68.8 years, 67.5% male, 87.6% with hypertension, 76.9% with hyperlipidemia, 40.5% with diabetes mellitus, 90.5% in Rutherford Classification Category (RCC) 2 to 3, and 9.5% in RCC 4 to 5. Average length and reference vessel diameter (RVD) were 16.37 cm and 4.66 mm, respectively; 49.7% of lesions were totally occluded. In multivariable analysis, only residual stenosis >30% was associated with patency loss, whereas residual stenosis >30% and smaller preprocedure RVD were associated with increased binary restenosis risk. RCC >3 and residual stenosis >30% were associated with increased 12-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization risk. ConclusionsPatency loss after DCB treatment was influenced by procedural and clinical factors. Residual stenosis >30%, smaller preprocedure RVD, and higher RCC may be considered predictors of increased risk of DCB failure and its components in femoropopliteal artery disease. (Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral® Drug Coated Balloon vs Standard PTA for the Treatment of SFA and Proximal Popliteal Arterial Disease [INPACT SFA I]; NCT01175850; IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery [SFA] and Proximal Popliteal Artery [PPA] [INPACT SFA II]; NCT01566461; MDT-2113 Drug-Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery [MDT-2113 SFA]; NCT01947478; IN.PACT Global Clinical Study; NCT01609296)

Prospective study comparing drug coated balloons versus balloon angioplasty for management of critical limb ischemia patients with tibial occlusive disease

Background: For years interventionists have been searching for a technique of angioplasty to provide a reasonable patency without leaving something behind, and drug coated balloons came as the answer long waited with very promising preliminary results. This study aimed to compare between plain balloons and drug coated balloons as regard patency and limb salvage in treating tibial atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Methods: A prospective, randomized study. Patients with CTLI due to tibial atherosclerotic occlusive disease with or without concomitant inflow involvement are randomized into 2 groups, group A standard balloon angioplasty and group B drug coated balloons in a ratio of 2: 1. All patients were followed up for 12 months both clinically and radiologically for patency, limb salvage and wound healing. Results: No statistically significant differences were found regarding demographic data, co-morbidities, and risk factors between both groups. 93.3% of patients were diabetics. The one-year primary patency rates differ between the two approaches only at 12 months and was better for the DCB group (P-value 0.004). The one-year limb salvage rates didn’t differ between the two groups.

Comparison of Primary Patency Rate between Drug- Coated Balloon and Plain Balloon Angioplasty in Hemodialysis Access

Objective: Hemodialysis adequacy in end-stage renal disease patients plays a crucial role in their quality of life. Repeated stenosis at the anastomotic site of arteriovenous fistula and synthetic arteriovenous graft are a major cause of access failure resulting in hospitalization, catheter usage, and contributing substantially to increased health care costs. Although standard plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) is successful, the patency rate over time is often poor. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) delivering an anti-restenosis agent, Paclitaxel, may improve patency. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether there is an increase in primary patency rate in drug-coated balloon angioplasty compared to conventional plain balloon angioplasty.Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 55 patients with stenotic arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) treated with DCB or PBA. Thirty-five patients were treated with drug-coated balloons, while twenty patients were treated with the standard plain balloon angioplasty. Follow up assessment was scheduled at three months, six months, and nine months. Our primary outcome was the primary patency rate, defined as the interval from the time of intervention until hemodialysis inadequacy.Results: There were 55 patients including twenty-one males and thirty-four females participated in the study. The average age of the 55 patients was 65.43 ± 12.89 years. Thirty (54.5%) patients were diabetes mellitus and 40 (72.7%) patients had hypertension. Seven patients (12.7%) had dyslipidemia. Eight patients (14.5%) had ischemic heart disease. And four patients (7.3%) had hyperparathyroidism. No significant differences in patency rate were found between gender, age group and patients’ underlying diseases. The proportion of primary patency rate comparing between the DCB and PBA treatment was 96.3% versus 73.9% at 6 months (P=0.017) and 92.6% versus 40% at 9 months (P<0.001). After multivariable analysis was performed (adjusted for sex, age, and underlying diseases), we found that stenosis was more likely to occur in patients who had undergone plain balloon angioplasty rather than drug-coated balloon angioplasty (HR 15.75; 95% CI 2.5%-99.1%, P=0.003).Conclusion: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty, when compared with plain balloon angioplasty, achieves a more desirable primary patency rate at 6 months and 9 months after the procedure.

Major adverse limb events in patients with femoro-popliteal and below-the-knee peripheral arterial disease treated with either sirolimus-coated balloon or standard uncoated balloon angioplasty: a structured protocol summary of the \u201cSirPAD\u201d randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPeripheral arterial disease is a progressive atherosclerotic disease with symptoms ranging from an intermittent claudication to acute critical limb ischemia and amputations. Drug-coated balloons and stents were developed to prevent neo-intimal proliferation and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Randomized controlled trials showed that drug-coated, notably paclitaxel-coated, devices reduce restenosis, late lumen loss, and the need for target lesion re-vascularization compared with uncoated ones. However, the size of these trials was too small to prove superiority for “hard” clinical outcomes. Moreover, available studies were characterized by too restrictive eligibility criteria. Finally, it remains unclear whether paclitaxel-coated balloons may impair long-term survival. Alternative drug-coated balloons, the so-called limus-based analogs, have been approved for clinical use in patients with peripheral arterial disease. By encapsulating sirolimus in phospholipid drug nanocarriers, they optimize adhesion properties of sirolimus and provide better bioavailability.MethodsIn this investigator-initiated all-comer open-label phase III randomized controlled trial, we will evaluate whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is non-inferior and eventually superior, according to a predefined hierarchical analysis, to uncoated balloon angioplasty in adults with infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease requiring endovascular angioplasty. Key exclusion criteria are pregnancy or breastfeeding, known intolerance or allergy to sirolimus, and participation in a clinical trial during the previous 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of two clinically relevant non-subjective “hard” outcomes: unplanned major amputation of the target limb and endovascular or surgical target lesion re-vascularization for critical limb ischemia occurring within 1 year of randomization. The primary safety outcome includes death from all causes.DiscussionBy focusing on clinically relevant outcomes, this study will provide useful information on the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon catheters for infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease in a representative (“all-comer”) population of unselected patients. As regulatory agencies had raised safety concerns in patients exposed to paclitaxel-coated devices (versus uncoated ones), collect mortality data up to 5 years after randomization will be collected.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04238546

Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial.

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of angioplasty using drug-eluting balloons (DEB) compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) to reduce the rate of restenosis.MethodsThis prospective, single-centre, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients that had primary or restenotic lesions in native upper extremity arteriovenous (AV) fistulas or at the graft-venous anastomosis. Patients were randomized to angioplasty with a POBA or a DEB. The primary effectiveness endpoints were freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and functional status of access circuit at 12 months.ResultsA total of 42 (28 male, 14 female; age range, 42–83 years) patients were enrolled. Patients were followed for 12 months. No significant differences were detected between the POBA and DEB groups regarding total number of TLR procedures (31 versus 36, respectively), freedom from TLR (3 versus 4, respectively) and functional status of the access circuit at 12 months (14 of 20 patients [70%] versus 17 of 22 patients [77%], respectively).ConclusionThis clinical trial did not demonstrate any significant differences between DEB angioplasty and standard balloon angioplasty when treating dysfunctional haemodialysis access.

The safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal artery: A network meta-analysis.

Introduction: Femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging treatment. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) for femoropopliteal artery ISR to explore the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapeutic strategies. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used as data sources. The network meta-analysis (NWM) approach used random-effects models based on the frequentist framework. We compared technical success rate, primary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major amputation at the 12-month follow-up for femoropopliteal artery ISR. Results: In total, 14 eligible studies (10 prospective and four retrospective; 1348 patients; and eight treatment modalities - standard balloon angioplasty (SBA), drug-coated balloon (DCB), peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty (PCBA), Viabahn endoprosthesis (VBE), directional atherectomy (DA), excimer laser atherectomy (ELA), and combinations - were included. The primary patency rates (at 6 months) were significantly higher for DCB and ELA+DCB than for SBA and ELA+SBA. ELA+DCB had higher primary patency rates (at 12 months) than ELA+SBA and SBA. The technical success rates were significantly lower for DCB and SBA than for VBE. The major amputation rates were significantly lower for ELA+DCB than for DCB. Based on the surface values under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), ELA+DCB was considered the best treatment in terms of primary patency at 6 months (SUCRA = 91.1), primary patency at 12 months (SUCRA = 82.3), and TLR (SUCRA = 83.4). Conclusion: ELA+DCB showed positive encouraging results in primary patency (6, 12 months), TLR, and major amputation in femoropopliteal ISR. The efficacy and safety of ELA+DCB are worthy of further investigation. PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42021246674.

Endovascular Management of Thrombosed Dialysis Vascular Circuits.

A functional hemodialysis vascular access is the lifeline for patients with end-stage kidney disease and is considered a major determinant of survival and quality of life in this patient population. Hemodialysis therapy can be performed via arteriovenous fistulas, arteriovenous grafts, and central venous catheters (CVCs). Following dialysis vascular access creation, the interplay between several pathologic mechanisms can lead to vascular luminal obstruction due to neointimal hyperplasia with subsequent stenosis, stasis, and eventually access thrombosis. Restoration of the blood flow in the vascular access circuit via thrombectomy is crucial to avoid the use of CVCs and to prolong the life span of the vascular access conduits. The fundamental principles of thrombectomy center around removing the thrombus from the thrombosed access and treating the underlying culprit vascular stenosis. Several endovascular devices have been utilized to perform mechanical thrombectomy and have shown comparable outcomes. Standard angioplasty balloons remain the cornerstone for the treatment of stenotic vascular lesions. The utility of drug-coated balloons in dialysis vascular access remains unsettled due to conflicting results from randomized clinical trials. Stent grafts are used to treat resistant and recurrent stenotic lesions and to control extravasation from a ruptured vessel that is not controlled by conservative measures. Overall, endovascular thrombectomy is the preferred modality of treatment for the thrombosed dialysis vascular conduits.

A single-centre, retrospective analysis of mortality over 80 months comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty in the treatment of dysfunctional arteriovenous access.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is a standard treatment for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis to preserve haemodialysis vascular access, promoting improved dialysis adequacy and better outcomes for those dependent on renal replacement therapy. Drug coated balloons (DCB) may help reduce the rate of neointimal hyperplasia and recurrent stenosis, but their use in femoropopliteal angioplasty has been associated with increased mortality at 2 and 5 year follow-up. This study aims to address the long-term safety of PTA for AVF stenosis with clinical correlation to participant co-morbidity and mortality. All patients undergoing PTA for AVF stenosis at a single centre between 2013 and 2017 were identified and grouped according to the use of DCB versus standard balloon angioplasty. All data was anonymised and correlated to verify independent predictors of mortality. 481 (400 standard balloon; 81 DCB) procedures were performed in 313 patients (250 standard balloon; 63 DCB). Follow-up at 80 months did not show any difference in mortality (p = 0.546). Multivariate analysis identified time on dialysis (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.001) and Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.02) as independent predictors of mortality. In this study, mortality was not associated with the use of DCBs, but was related to established factors of dialysis longevity, age and comorbidity.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Standard Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Long Femoropopliteal Lesions: Post Hoc Analysis of the 24-Month Results of the AcoArt I Study

Restenosis is a common complication after endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment has been proven safe and effective in reducing the rate of restenosis for simple and short lesions. However, the clinical results of DCBs for long lesions are still very limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCBs in the treatment of long femoropopliteal artery disease. And the results of this study will also complement the existing evidence of DCB treatment of long lesions. Patients with lesion length ≥ 15cm according to computed tomography angiography (CTA) or angiography in the AcoArt I Study were included into this study. Based on the balloon catheter used in treatment, patients were divided into the DCB group and the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) group. The demographic, lesion, and procedural characteristics and 24-month follow-up results were compared between the 2 groups. The primary efficacy endpoints were angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months or at the time of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), primary patency (PP), freedom from CD-TLR, and changes in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and Rutherford class during 24 months of follow-up. The safety endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse events. The total number of patients was 87, including 42 in the DCB group and 45 in the PTA group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in demographic, lesion,and procedural characteristics. The 6-month follow-up angiography showed that the LLL was significantly smaller in the DCB group than the PTA group (0.27 ± 0.90 mm vs 1.32 ± 0.91 mm; P < 0.001). At 24 months, compared with the PTA group, the DCB group had a significantly higher rate of freedom from CD-TLR (81.58% vs 43.18%; P < 0.001) and a significantly higher PP rate (46.88% vs 15.00%; P=0.003). The DCB group had a significantly higher ABI than the PTA group at 6, 12, and 24 months (P < 0.001, P=0.004 and P=0.018, respectively). The DCB group had a better Rutherford class than the PTA group at 6 and 12 months (P=0.033 and P=0.012, respectively); the Rutherford class did not significantly differ between the 2 groups at 24 months (P=0.127). The incidence of major adverse events did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The effectiveness of the DCB is superior to a standard uncoated balloon in treating long lesions during 24 months of follow-up. Furthermore, the safety of the DCB is equivalent to that of PTA.

Treatment of cephalic arch stenosis in dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas with paclitaxel-coated versus conventional balloon angioplasty

BackgroundTreatment of cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) with standard plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), is associated with early re-stenosis and higher failure rates compared to other lesions. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) may improve patency rates. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent POBA or PCB for CAS over a 3-year period were included. Outcomes compared were circuit primary patency rates (patency from index procedure to next intervention), circuit primary assisted-patency rates (patency from index procedure to thrombosis), and target lesion (CAS) patency rates (stenosis > 50%) at 3, 6 and 12 months.ResultsNinety-one patients were included. Sixty-five (71.4%) had POBA, while 26 (28.6%) had PCB angioplasty. There were 62 (68.1%) de-novo lesions. CAS was the only lesion that needed treatment in 24 (26.4%) patients. Circuit primary patency rates for POBA versus PCB groups were 76.2% vs. 60% (p = 0.21), 43.5% vs. 36% (p = 0.69) and 22% vs. 9.1% (p = 0.22) at 3, 6 and 12-months respectively. Circuit assisted-primary patency rates were 93.7% vs. 92% (p = 1.00), 87.1% vs. 80% (p = 0.51) and 76.3% vs. 81.8% (p = 0.77), whilst CAS target lesion intervention-free patency rates were 79.4% vs. 68% (p = 0.40), 51.6% vs. 52% (p = 1.00) and 33.9% vs. 22.7% (p = 0.49) at 3, 6 and 12-months respectively. Estimated mean time to target lesion intervention was 215 ± 183.2 days for POBA and 225 ± 186.6 days for PCB (p = 0.20).ConclusionTreatment of CAS with PCB did not improve target lesion or circuit patency rates compared to POBA.

The efficacy of paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus standard balloon angioplasty in stenosis of native hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas

Abstract Background End stage renal disease is on increasing trend and haemodialysis is the main dialysis modality among these patients. Thus, a functioning dialysis vascular access is critical to the delivery of life-saving haemodialysis treatment to these patients. Conventional angioplasty is the first line of treatment; with a 50% of permeability rate (6 months). For this reason, new alternatives are necessary to maintain the access permeability.Hypothesis: Paclitaxel coated balloon is superior to conventional plain balloon angioplasty with decreased re-stenosis of target lesion, improved access circuit and target lesion patency, and decreased number of interventions needed to maintain patency. Methods A total of 39 patients were randomized to receive a paclitaxel-coated balloon (n=15) or plain angioplasty balloon (n=24) after satisfactory angioplasty with a high-pressure balloon. The inclusion criteria were clinical signs of vascular dysfunction confirmed by Doppler Ultrasound and/or angiography. The primary endpoint was target lesion patency defined as time elapsed between the completion of effective and the appearance of restenosis at 3, 6 and 12 months after angioplasty. Secondary endpoints included the relationship between the location of the stenosis, previous angioplasty, demographic variables and survival. Results We recruited 39 patients with dysfunctional vascular accesses; 24 were assigned to the conventional balloon angioplasty group and 15 drug-eluting balloon angioplasty (paclitaxel). With demographic characteristics in Table I. In group A, all were autologous acces. Group B 16% (4) of the accesses were prosthetic and 84% (20) autologous. In relation to the type and length of stenosis, group A was more frequent at the level and longer, whereas in group B it predominated in the central type and less than 20 mm.In our study, we also observed a high rate of total occlusions, frequently in central vessels in group B, while in group A, where peripheral vessels were predominant, total occlusion was less frequent. Table II. We had no complications in either group, and dialysis was immediate at the end of the procedure. Group A did not present restenosis. Table III. Table III shows DEB group (15p) with 100% of permeability according to follow-up and only one (1/15) of patients died due to myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident and this patient kept lasted 9 months without restenosis In Table IV. Group B had 2 (8%) patients with restenosis so it was necessary to reoperate using a drug eluting balloon and until now there is no restenosis. From this group we do not have mortality. One patient 1 (24%) had a recovered infarction. Conclusions Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty resulted in superior survival of dysfunctional peripheral vascular access at 12 meses. Both arms show equivalent complications and similar mortality Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Enrique Garcés Hospital

The \u201cFracking\u201d technique: a novel approach to crack deep calcified plaque in the common femoral artery with hydraulic pressure

BackgroundThe patency achieved by conventional peripheral interventions for atherosclerotic lesions in the common femoral artery (CFA), called the “no stenting zone”, is not superior to that achieved by surgical endarterectomy due to calcified plaque occupying the area. Plaque modification strategies to obtain acute gain in CFA patency provide the better clinical outcomes than standard balloon angioplasty. Atherectomy devices, which focus on the modification of superficial calcifications, contribute to the improvement of clinical outcomes. However, deep calcifications resist vessel expansion such that luminal gain is not easily achieved.Main textWe propose a novel calcified plaque modification technique, named the “fracking technique” (FT). The term fracking refers to how a rock is fractured by the high hydraulic pressure. In this technique, deep calcifications are cracked with hydraulic pressure via a balloon indeflator through an 18-gauge needle, which punctures calcifications to achieve greater acute luminal gain. Case 1 involved an 81-year-old male with eccentric calcified plaque in the right CFA. Conventional balloon angioplasty for the lesion yielded a suboptimal minimal lumen area (MLA), which increased from 6.2 to 10.7-mm2 on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The FT was implemented to obtain a larger MLA. After the FT was repeated at three locations at up to 8-atm, a greater MLA of 27.1-mm2 was achieved without complications. Case 2 involved a 72-year-old male undergoing hemodialysis due to diabetes mellitus who presented with ischemic pain in his right limbs at rest due to severe stenosis with eccentric calcification in the distal CFA. The MLA on IVUS before and after balloon angioplasty was 10.0-mm2 and 13.1-mm2, respectively, and this result was still suboptimal. The FT was attempted and successfully yielded a greater MLA of 28.9-mm2 without complications. Restenosis has not been detected for 2 years follow-up period.ConclusionsThe FT is an effective option for treating calcified CFA lesions to achieve a larger lumen area. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary.