Stainless Steel Environmental Surfaces Research Articles

Validation of the FSTestTM Aerobic Count Plates Method for Enumeration of Aerobic Bacteria in a Variety of Matrixes and Stainless Steel Environmental Surface: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 112301.

The FSTestTM Aerobic Count (AC) Plates are ready-to-use culture media containing nutrients, a cold-water-soluble gelling agent, and a chromogenic indicator. The objective of this study was to validate the FSTest AC plate method for AOAC INTERNATIONAL Performance Tested MethodsSM (PTM) certification for a variety of foods and stainless steel. The performance of the FSTest AC plates were compared to the appropriate reference method, for the detection of total aerobic bacterial in a variety of foods matrixes (raw ground beef, raw ground pork, cooked ham, raw chicken breast, raw shrimp, frozen tuna, shredded bagged lettuce, cherry tomato, pasteurized liquid milk, nonfat milk powder) and on stainless steel surfaces. Robustness, consistency, and stability studies of the FSTest AC plate were also conducted. The results of the matrix study showed the standard deviation of repeatability (sr) was similar in both the FSTest AC plate method and the reference method. The 90% confidence interval of the difference between means between the two methods was found to fall within -0.5 to 0.5 log10 for all matrixes at all levels in the method developer and independent laboratory studies. The data in the report also support that the FSTest AC plate method is robust, manufactured in a consistent manner, and can be stable for 18 months at 4-10°C. The FSTest AC method is validated to be equivalent to the appropriate reference methods for the enumeration of aerobic bacteria in a variety of food matrixes and on stainless steel surfaces at 36 ± 1°C, and 32 ± 1°C (for dairy matrixes) in 24 ± 1 h. The FSTest AC plate method offers the advantage of saving labor, space, and time, as results are available within 24 h for all tested matrixes.

Validation of the KangarooSci® Aerobic Count Plate for the Enumeration of Meosphilic Aerobic Bacteria in Selected Foods and on Stainless Steel Environmental Surfaces: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 062301.

The KangarooSci® Aerobic Count Plate is a sample-ready culture medium system, for direct counting of aerobic bacteria colonies after 48-72 h of incubation. The KangarooSci Aerobic Count Plate was evaluated for AOAC® Performance Tested Methods SM certification. The KangarooSci Aerobic Count Plate (ACP) was evaluated through matrix studies and product consistency/stability study and robustness testing. For the matrix study, nine food products (nonfat dry milk powder, fresh raw bovine milk, pasteurized liquid bovine milk, fresh raw ground beef, frozen uncooked chicken breast, cooked shredded pork, apple juice, ice cream, and fresh strawberries), and one environmental surface (stainless steel) were evaluated following the KangarooSci ACP product instructions and compared to the ISO 4833-1:2013-pat 1, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-Horizontal methods for the enumeration of microorganisms-Part 1: Colony count at 30 °C by the pour plate technique reference standard. The product consistency and stability testing evaluated three separate production lots of the KangarooSci ACP. The robustness testing examined three test parameters, volume of sample plated, incubation time, and incubation temperature using a factorial study design. Results from the matrix study demonstrated equivalent performance between the KangarooSci ACP and the ISO 4833-1:2013 reference standard. The product consistency and stability testing showed that the performance of the assay was equivalent over time up to 12 months and between production lots. Minor changes to the operational test conditions showed no significant impact on performance during the robustness testing. The KangarooSci ACP is an effective method for aerobic plate count for all matrixes evaluated. The KangarooSci Aerobic Count Plate allows for fast, reliable enumeration of aerobic bacteria. Utilizing the alternative method takes up less space in incubators, requiring no sample spreader, and requires less consumables compared to the reference method.

Validation of the Reveal® 3-D for Gluten Assay for Detection of Gluten in Clean-in-Place Rinses and Stainless Steel Environmental Surfaces: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 122201.

Reveal® 3-D for Gluten is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative detection of gluten in environmental samples. The test uses monoclonal antibodies reactive to prolamins in wheat. The objective of the study was to validate the Reveal 3-D test for detection of gluten in clean-in-place rinse and swabs from a stainless steel surface. Elements of the study included food selectivity and interference testing, matrix testing, an assay robustness study, and reagent stability/lot-to-lot consistency testing. Wheat flour was used as the spiking material for all matrixes. In selectivity and interference testing, nine target matrixes all tested positive and 36 of 39 non-target matrixes tested negative. Almond flour, sesame flour, and cornstarch produced positive results as 100% commodities; reactivity can be eliminated with dilution or by testing without use of food extraction buffer, which is not a standard part of the environmental testing method. With a gluten spike at 9.3 mg/kg, chestnut flour, guar gum, and xanthan gum as 100% commodities inhibited the ability of the assay to detect gluten when tested without dilution. In quaternary ammonium clean-in-place rinse and swabs from stainless steel, 100% positive results were obtained at levels of 2.8 mg/kg and 4.7 µg/100 cm2, respectively. Results of independent laboratory testing of swabs from stainless steel supported those of internal trials. Robustness testing showed that introducing variations to three operating parameters simultaneously had no adverse effect on assay performance. In the reagent stability study, data supported kit expiration dating of 11 months. Results of the current study show that the Reveal test is an accurate and reliable method for qualitative detection of gluten in select clean-in-place rinse and environmental samples. The Reveal test was able to detect gluten at levels of 2.8 ppm in clean-in-place rinse and 4.7 µg/100 cm2 in swabs from stainless steel.

Validation of the Modified Clear Safety Salmonella for Detection of Salmonella enterica in Selected Poultry and Pet Food Matrixes and on Stainless Steel: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 111802.

The Clear Safety Salmonella method was modified to improve sample preparation, PCR reagents, library preparation, flow cell quality control, library loading mix, priming mix, and sequencing kit reagents and steps. To evaluate the modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (manual and automated) via independent and method developer validation studies according to current AOAC INTERNATIONAL Validation Guidelines. Performance of the modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (manual and automated) was assessed for selectivity (using 105 inclusive and 30 exclusive strains), probability of detection in matrixes, product consistency, stability, and robustness. The modified Clear Safety Salmonella method was compared with the appropriate reference method for Salmonella detection on 4 inch × 4 inch stainless steel environmental surfaces, and in chicken carcass rinse (30 mL), raw ground chicken (375 g), dry pet food (375 g), and ready-to-eat deli turkey breast (375 g). The modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (manual and automated) demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the candidate and reference method probability of detection or between the presumptive and confirmed results for all target food matrixes and the stainless steel surface. Additionally, the modified method (manual and automated) detected all 105 inclusivity organisms and excluded all 30 exclusivity organisms. The product consistency and kit stability studies showed no statistical differences between lots or over the term of the kit's shelf life. In robustness studies, changes in enrichment time, diluted sample volume, and sample volume for PCR did not show any statistical difference in terms of assay performance. The modified Clear Safety Salmonella method (both manual and automated) is statistically equivalent to or better than the reference methods. The Clear Safety Salmonella method utilizes PCR amplification and targeted next-generation sequencing technology to selectively detect Salmonella enterica.

Validation Study for VERIPRO® SARS-CoV-2 Env Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Stainless-Steel Environmental Surface Swabs: Emergency Response Validation—AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 122001

BackgroundThe VERIPRO SARS-CoV-2 Env assay uses reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) to detect SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, from stainless steel environmental sample swabs.ObjectiveTo validate the VERIPRO SARS-CoV-2 Env assay as part of the AOAC Research Institute’s Emergency Response Validation Performance Tested MethodSM program.MethodsThe VERIPRO SARS-CoV-2 Env assay was evaluated for specificity using in silico analysis of 15 764 SARS-CoV-2 sequences and 65 exclusivity organisms (both near neighbors and background organisms). The candidate method was evaluated in an unpaired study design for one environmental surface (stainless steel) and compared to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Instructions for Use (Revision 4, Effective 6/12/2020).ResultsResults of the in silico analysis demonstrated the specificity of the method in being able to detect target sequences and discriminate them from near neighbors. In the matrix study, the candidate method demonstrated statistically significant better recovery of the target analyte than the reference method.ConclusionsThe VERIPRO SARS-CoV-2 Env assay is a rapid and accurate method that can be utilized by food producers to detect the causative agent of COVID-19 on food contact surfaces.HighlightsThe VERIPRO SARS-CoV-2 Env assay can be performed without the need for an optional RNA purification step to detect SARS-CoV-2 from environmental surfaces.

Validation of the saniTracers Sanitation Verification Method from Stainless Steel Environmental Surfaces: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 032001.

Effective sanitation of equipment is critical in an integrated food safety system. Existing sanitation verification methods have significant shortcomings that decrease their effectiveness and create an opportunity for novel approaches. This study is intended to validate abiotic bacterial surrogates (saniTracers™) for the rapid verification of solid surface sanitation processes. AOAC validation studies included a pure analyte LOD, matrix studies, inhibition, selectivity, product consistency and stability, instrument variation, and robustness. Stainless steel coupons (4 × 4"), pure or diluted analyte, and Chai qPCR systems were used for those studies. The saniTracers were quantified by qPCR. Average ΔCt values for all matrixes at 50 and 250 ppm sodium hypochlorite sanitation show 3.23 and 11.95, respectively. saniTracers behave similarly in the presence of all matrixes. saniTracers were not inhibited at significant concentrations by any of the sanitizers used. No discrepant results were observed with the robustness study. Lot-to-lot/stability testing demonstrated no differences between the three lots of tests analyzed. saniTracers demonstrated high repeatability and minimal interference from matrix, disinfectant, or microorganisms. The microbial selectivity study indicated a correlation between the removal of pathogens and change in Ct value for saniTracers, following the disinfection process. An average log(cfu) reduction of 4.00 was observed for the three pathogens evaluated, correlating to an average 10.65 Ct change in saniTracers, indicating a correlation in the removal of an average of 0.38 log(cfu) of pathogens per one saniTracer Ct change, following the disinfection process.

Independent Validation for the Polyskope 1.0 Multiplex Pathogen Detection Assay for the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Non-O157 STEC, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella Species.

The Polyskope 1.0 Multiplex Assay is a novel test to simultaneously detect Escherichia coli O157, non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC), Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella species in a single enrichment using real-time PCR. A Performance Tested MethodSM study was conducted to validate Polyskope 1.0 for inclusivity and exclusivity as well as a matrix comparison study. This assay was evaluated in an unpaired independent validation study compared with reference methods according to AOAC INTERNATIONAL validation guidelines. Polyskope 1.0 evaluated raw ground beef (25 g), deli turkey (25 g), baby spinach (25 g), and stainless-steel environmental surface sponges (4 × 4 in. test area) after inoculation with a suspension of the three target microorganisms. All matrices were compared with appropriate reference methods from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook, or International Organization for Standardization standards. Polyskope 1.0 demonstrated no statistically significant differences between candidate and reference method results or between presumptive and confirmed results for three food matrices and one environmental surface. Results from inclusivity and exclusivity evaluations indicated the test method can accurately detect the target analytes and excluded all nontarget organisms. No differences were observed with the stability or lot-to-lot evaluations. Polyskope 1.0 demonstrated robustness by remaining unaffected by small variations in method parameters, which had no statistically significant effect on the results for all eight variations. Conclusions and Highlights: Polyskope 1.0 was shown to be a specific, highly accurate, and robust method for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella species, non-O157 STECs, and E. coli O157 across four matrices.

Validation of Solus One Salmonella from Select Food Matrixes and Stainless-Steel and Plastic Environmental Surfaces.

Background: Solus One Salmonella is designed to accurately detect Salmonella species (Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica, salamae, arizonae, diarizonae, houtenae, indica, and Salmonella bongori) from select food matrixes and stainless-steel and plastic environmental surfaces. Solus One Salmonella uses an antibody-based technology test system that is paired with media and our proprietary media supplement, the Solus One Salmonella supplement combined with a manual or automated sample preparation method. Objective: Solus One Salmonella was evaluated for inclusivity and exclusivity, and a matrix comparison study was done for six food matrixes (raw beef trim, pasteurized liquid egg, raw salmon, cheddar cheese, Romaine lettuce, nonfat dry milk) and two environmental surfaces (stainless steel and polystyrene). Methods: Solus One Salmonella was compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 5: Salmonella (July 2018) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Manual, 4.09 (January 2017) in the matrix study. Both the manual and automated sample preparation methods were performed for cheddar cheese and stainless-steel environmental surfaces. Results: For the inclusivity and exclusivity evaluation, Solus One Salmonella correctly detected all 108 target organism isolates and correctly excluded all 35 nontarget strains that were analyzed. Conclusions: In the method comparison study, both Solus One Salmonella manual and automated sample preparation methods demonstrated no significant differences based on probability of detection (POD) statistical analysis between presumptive and confirmed results or between candidate and reference method results for the six food matrixes after 20-22 h and two environmental surfaces after 16-20 h of enrichment time. POD analysis of Solus One Salmonella method robustness, product consistency, and stability studies using the automated sample preparation method demonstrated no statistically significant differences.

Independent Validation for the Polyskope 1.0 Multiplex Pathogen Detection Assay for the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Non-O157 STEC, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella Species

Background: The Polyskope 1.0 Multiplex Assay is a novel test to simultaneously detect Escherichia coli O157, non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC), Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella species in a single enrichment using real-time PCR. Objective: A Performance Tested MethodSM study was conducted to validate Polyskope 1.0 for inclusivity and exclusivity as well as a matrix comparison study. Method: This assay was evaluated in an unpaired independent validation study compared with reference methods according to AOAC INTERNATIONAL validation guidelines. Polyskope 1.0 evaluated raw ground beef (25 g), deli turkey (25 g), baby spinach (25 g), and stainless-steel environmental surface sponges (4 × 4 in. test area) after inoculation with a suspension of the three target microorganisms. All matrices were compared with appropriate reference methods from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook, or International Organization for Standardization standards. Results: Polyskope 1.0 demonstrated no statistically significant differences between candidate and reference method results or between presumptive and confirmed results for three food matrices and one environmental surface. Results from inclusivity and exclusivity evaluations indicated the test method can accurately detect the target analytes and excluded all nontarget organisms. No differences were observed with the stability or lot-to-lot evaluations. Polyskope 1.0 demonstrated robustness by remaining unaffected by small variations in method parameters, which had no statistically significant effect on the results for all eight variations. Conclusions and Highlights: Polyskope 1.0 was shown to be a specific, highly accurate, and robust method for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella species, non-O157 STECs, and E. coli O157 across four matrices.

Method Modification to Extend the Matrix Claim of the Thermo Scientific RapidFinder Salmonella species, Typhimurium, and Enteritidis Multiplex PCR Kit.

Background: The Thermo Scientific RapidFinder™ Salmonella species, Typhimurium and Enteritidis Multiplex PCR Kit is a real-time multiplex PCR assay for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella species, Salmonella Typhimurium, and S. Enteritidis from poultry, pork, and environmental samples. The method has previously been granted certification as Performance Tested Method SM (PTM) 081701, validated according to the AOAC Research Institute (RI) PTM program for poultry (chicken thighs with skin, chicken wings with skin, and chicken nuggets), raw pork sausage matrixes, and stainless steel environmental surface sponges. Objective: This report details the method modification study to validate ground turkey (375 g sample size), chicken carcass rinse, and shell egg matrixes. Methods: The candidate method was compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 5 for shell eggs and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service's Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 4.09 for ground turkey (375 g) and chicken carcass rinse matrixes. Results: The statistically significant differences found between the candidate and reference methods upon analysis by probability of detection were in favor of the candidate method. Inclusivity and exclusivity testing demonstrated that the RapidFinder Salmonella species, Typhimurium and Enteritidis Multiplex PCR Kit was able to detect all the major groups of Salmonella. All exclusivity isolates were correctly excluded. Conclusions: The data presented in this report show that the candidate is suitable for the detection and differentiation of Salmonellae from shell egg, chicken carcass rinse, and ground turkey (375 g) matrixes. Highlights: Thermo Scientific RapidFinder Salmonella species, Typhimurium and Enteritidis Multiplex PCR Kit (candidate method) matrix claims extended to include ground turkey (375 g), chicken carcass rinse and shell egg samples.

Validation of Workflow Changes, Phage Concentration and Reformatted Detection Threshold for the Sample6 DETECT/L™ Test: Level 3 Modification.

The AOAC Research Institute Performance Tested MethodsSM Program certified Sample6 DETECT/L™ in April 2014 (Certification No. 041401) for the detection of Listeria species (L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, L. marthii, L. welshimeri) on stainless steel environmental surfaces. A modification was approved in January 2016, increasing the concentration of sanitizer-neutralizing reagents in detection reagents, increasing the number of phage in the detection solution, and increasing the sample test volume. Moreover, changes to reduce the number of negative controls and add compatibility with polyurethane sponges were also approved. In this modification, to ensure that DETECT/L continues to meet performance expectations, Sample6 evaluated workflow changes to enhance sensitivity and the ease-of-use of the assay. Changes to the phage concentration and detection threshold, plus the inclusion of a confirmation step (DETECT Check), were validated to obtain better accuracy and optimize assay performance. Inclusivity, exclusivity, and robustness testing were conducted by Sample6 to evaluate the changes. A third-party laboratory compared the DETECT/L assay and the U.S. Department of Agriculture reference method in a stainless steel environmental surface matrix study. The data presented in this report demonstrate that the changes proposed to the DETECT/L assay meet or exceed the performance in the current configuration.

The Validation of the Sample6 DETECTTM HT/L for AOAC Research Institute.

Listeria spp. are an important foodborne human pathogen because of their ability to cause disease and high mortality in individuals, particularly pregnant women, neonates, the elderly, immunocompromised individuals, and children. The Sample6 DETECTTM HT/L Kit is a semi-automated qualitative pathogen detection system designed to detect Listeria spp. (L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, L. welshimeri, and L. marthii) in environmental samples using the Sample6 BioIlluminationTM technology. The study was done to evaluate the Sample6 DETECT HT/L Kit. The assay was evaluated for inclusivity, exclusivity, robustness, product consistency, and stability, and a matrix study of one environmental surface. The performance of the Sample6 DETECT HT/L was compared with U.S. Food and Drug Administration reference culture method for Listeria using an unpaired study design. The Sample6 DETECT HT/L assay correctly identified all 50 inclusivity isolates and correctly excluded all 30 nontarget strains evaluated. The assay was not affected by minor variations in incubation temperature and time, or sample volume. Results across three production lots spanning the shelf life of the assay were consistent. In the matrix study, the Sample6 DETECT HT/L for Listeria correctly identified each test portion for the presence or absence of Listeria, and there were no statistically significant differences between candidate and reference method results. The data collected in this study demonstrate that the Sample6 DETECT HT/L assay is a reliable method for the detection of Listeria spp. on stainless-steel environmental surfaces after 22h of enrichment.

GlutenTox® Pro Test for the Detection of Gluten in Select Foods and Surfaces.

The GlutenTox® Pro Test is an immunochromatographic test for the detection of gluten in foods and on surfaces with varying compositions and levels of processing, from raw foods/ingredients to final product testing. The Method Developer evaluation for the validation of the GlutenTox Pro Test Kit (Biomedal Diagnostics, Sevilla, Spain) for the detection of gluten in foods and on surfaces was conducted at Biomedal, S. L., Camas, Sevilla, Spain. The GlutenTox Pro test method was evaluated by testing the following: cross-reactivity, interference, specificity and sensitivity, robustness, stability, lot-to-lot variation, food matrix, and environmental surface. To evaluate the performance of the GlutenToxPro test for the detection of gluten, 10 matrixes were selected: rice flour, bread/biscuit, rolled oat, pâté, and yogurt (and a second bread matrix for incurred sampled testing) for the food matrix study and food-grade painted wood, plastic, rubber, sealed ceramic, and stainless steel for the environmental surface matrix study. For the food matrix study, 30 replicates were evaluated at six spiked levels of gluten (0, 3, 8, 15, 25, and 45 ppm) against four detection thresholds (5, 10, 20, and 40 ppm) for each food matrix. Additionally, 10 replicates were evaluated at a concentration of 10,000 ppm using all four detection thresholds only for rice flour matrix. Three replicates of each concentration level of gluten were analyzed using paired samples by the AOAC OMA 2012.01 reference method for each food matrix. For the environmental surface study, 30 replicates were evaluated at a low spike level of gluten (16 ng/16 cm2), five replicates at a high spike level of gluten (400 ng/16 cm2), and five replicates at an unspiked control level (0 ng/16 cm2) for each surface matrix. Upon completion of testing, the probability of detection values and confidence intervals were calculated and plotted versus the concentration level as determined by the reference method when applicable. An independent laboratory evaluation of the GlutenTox Pro Test Kit with rice flour and stainless steel environmental surface was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH). The GlutenTox Pro Test Kit demonstrated reliability as an effective rapid method for the detection of gluten in food matrixes (LOD 5 ppm gluten; threshold limits 5, 10, 20, and 40 ppm gluten) and on environmental surfaces (amount of detection 16 ng/16 cm2).

MicroSEQ®Listeria monocytogenes Detection Kit

Abstract The Applied Biosystems Performance Tested MethodSM for detecting Listeria monocytogenes in food and environmental samples was compared to the Health Canada reference method (MFHPB-30) for the analysis of five ready-to-eat (RTE) meats (deli turkey, hot dogs, liver paté, deli ham, and raw fermented sausage) and a stainless steel environmental surface. The MicroSEQ® method includes the MicroSEQListeria monocytogenes Detection Kit and the option of two different sample preparation kits, either the automated high-throughput PrepSEQ™ Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit or the manual low- to mid-throughput PrepSEQ Rapid Spin Sample Preparation Kit. For each sample matrix, 20 replicates were analyzed at two inoculum levels: for RTE meats, a low-level inoculum at 0.2–2 CFU/25 g and a high-level inoculum at 2–5 CFU/25 g; and for environmental surfaces, a low-level inoculum at 0.2–2 CFU/5 cm2 sampling area and a high-level inoculum at 2–5 CFU/5 cm2 sampling area. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/25 g (uninoculated) for food or 0 CFU/5 cm2 sampling area for environmental surface. Both sample preparation methods returned identical results. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the MicroSEQ Listeria monocytogenes method and the MFHPB-30 reference method for four of the five RTE meats and the one stainless steel surface tested. For deli turkey, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of positive results detected by the MicroSEQ method and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the low inoculation level, with the MicroSEQ method detecting more positives. Because the MicroSEQ method uses real-time PCR to detect pathogens, it provides faster time-to-results compared to culture methods while at the same time demonstrating equivalent detection. The MicroSEQ method detects L. monocytogenes within 2 to 3 h following 24 to 28 h enrichment compared to culture methods that take at least 5 days for presumptive positive results.

MicroSEQ®Listeria spp. Detection Kit

Abstract The Applied Biosystems Performance Tested MethodSM for detecting Listeria species in food and environmental samples was compared to the Health Canada reference method (MFHPB-30) for the analysis of five ready-to-eat (RTE) meats (deli turkey, hot dogs, liver paté, deli ham, and raw fermented sausage) and a stainless steel surface. The MicroSEQ method includes the MicroSEQ®Listeria spp. Detection Kit and the option of two different sample preparation kits, either the automated high-throughput PrepSEQ™ Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit or the manual low- to mid-throughput PrepSEQ™ Rapid Spin Sample Preparation Kit. For each sample matrix, 20 replicates were analyzed at two inoculum levels: for RTE meats a low-level inoculum at 0.2–2 CFU/25 g and a high-level inoculum at 2–5 CFU/25 g; and for environmental surfaces, a low-level inoculum at 0.2–2 CFU/5 cm2 sampling area and a high-level inoculum at 2–5 CFU/5 cm2 sampling area. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/25 g (uninoculated) for food or 0 CFU/5 cm2 sampling area for environmental surface. Both sample preparation methods returned identical results. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the MicroSEQ Listeria species method and the MFHPB-30 reference method for three RTE meats and for the one stainless steel environmental surface tested. For deli turkey, there was a statistically significant difference in the number of positive results detected by the MicroSEQ method and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the low inoculation level, with the MicroSEQ method detecting more positives. For hot dogs, statistical equivalence was not applicable since hot dogs were spiked with 10x Listeria innocua as competitive background, and the MicroSEQ method detects all known Listeria. Because the MicroSEQ method uses real-time PCR to detect pathogens, it provides faster time-to-results with equivalent detection compared to culture methods. The MicroSEQ method detects Listeria species within 2 to 3 h following 24 to 28 h enrichment compared to culture methods that take at least 5 days for presumptive positive results.

3M™ Tecra™ Listeria Visual Immunoassay: AOAC Official MethodsSM 995.22 and 2002.09

A validation study of the 3M Tecra Listeria Visual Immunoassay (VIA; 3M Food Safety, St. Paul, MN) was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. The 3M Tecra Listeria VIA method was compared to the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the analysis of five ready-to-eat (RTE) meats: deli turkey, hot dogs, liver pate, raw fermented sausage, and deli ham, and on a stainless steel environmental surface. Twenty replicates of each of the five food matrixes were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level test portions were inoculated with 0.2-2 CFU/25 g, and the high-level test portions with 2-5 CFU/25 g. In addition, 20 replicates of one environmental surface were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level sampling area was inoculated with 0.2-2 CFU/5 cm2, and the high-level area with 2-5 CFU/5 cm2. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/25 g (uninoculated) for the foods and at 0 CFU/5 cm2 for the environmental sampling area. There was no significant difference in the number of positives detected by the 3M Tecra Listeria VIA and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for four of the RTE meats and the stainless steel environmental surface analyzed in this study. For the raw, fermented sausage, there was a significant difference in the number of positives detected for the high inoculum level by the 3M Tecra Listeria VIA and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method, with the 3M Tecra Listeria VIA method detecting more positives.

3M™ Petrifilm™ Environmental Listeria Plate

A validation study of the 3M Petrifilm Environmental Listeria (EL) Plate (3M Food Safety, St. Paul, MN) was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. The method was compared to the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the analysis of stainless steel environmental surfaces. Twenty replicates of the environmental surface were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level sampling area was inoculated with 0.2-2 CFU/5 cm2, and the high-level sampling area was inoculated with 2-5 CFU/5 cm2. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/5 cm2. There was no significant difference in the number of positives detected by the 3M Petrifilm EL Plate method and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the environmental surface analyzed in this study.