Cancer Staging System Research Articles

Abstract #1400120: A Case Report of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with Thymic Metastasis

Papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCA) are one of the most treatable cancers. Distant metastasis may occur, commonly to lungs and bones and is often associated with poorer prognosis. Metastasis to the thymus is extremely rare in any cancer and has only been reported in few case reports. We report a case of young Filipino patient presenting with papillary thyroid carcinoma metastasizing to the thymus. This is a case of a 32-year old Filipino female presenting with an incidental finding of a mediastinal mass with a palpable thyroid nodule. On neck ultrasound, multiple calcified nodules with increased vascularity over the right thyroid lobe and pretracheal lymphadenopathies were visualized. Fine-needle biopsy was performed and cytology was suspicious for PTCA. Chest CT showed non-enhancing hypodense cystic mediastinal mass while F18-FDG PET revealed a hypermetabolic thyroid nodule with a non-hypermetabolic right paratracheal mass. Total thyroidectomy with mediastinal mass excision was performed with histopathology showing PTCA metastasizing to perithyroidal and right thymic lymph nodes, left thymus and mediastinum. Radioactive iodine at a dose of 150 mCi was subsequently administered, followed by a post-therapy whole body scan showing no pathologic uptake. She was then maintained on TSH-suppressive dose of levothyroxine. On six months follow-up, TSH and thyroglobulin levels remained suppressed and a repeat neck ultrasound showed no evidence of recurrence. While PTCA is generally associated with a favorable prognosis, certain risk factors have been associated with worse clinical outcomes including advanced age, presence of distant metastasis and extent and size of the primary tumor. Age greatly affects the prognosis among PTCA patients as mortality was observed to be higher among patients aged 55 years above with distant metastasis compared to their younger counterparts. This provided the rationale for the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system which applies an age cut-off. In the recent years, it was also observed that while a younger age would lead to a better outcome in PTCA patients, certain young patients with distant metastasis still experienced poor survival outcomes compared to those without distant metastasis. Among these patients, male sex has been linked with poorer survival. Thymic metastasis in PTCA may be considered a distant metastasis. However, due to the scarcity of cases, the long-term clinical outcomes among PTCA patients with thymic metastasis is still uncertain. Few cases of thyroid malignancies with thymic metastasis have been reported and showed favorable prognosis with surgery alone. Nevertheless, due to an increased incidence of PTCA recurrence among Filipino patients, radioactive iodine therapy postoperatively was still performed for our patient in accordance to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommendation and led to favorable response. This highlights the importance of individualized management.

Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolisation for the treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the primary treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to the updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Although growing evidence favours liver resection (LR) over TACE for intermediate-stage HCC, the best treatment option remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) after LR versus TACE for intermediate-stage HCC. A comprehensive literature review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Studies that compared the efficacy of LR and TACE in patients with intermediate (BCLC stage B) HCC were selected. According to the recent updated BCLC classification, intermediate stage of HCC was defined as follows: (a) four or more HCC nodules of any size, or (b) two or three nodules, but if at least one tumour is larger than 3cm. The main outcome was OS, expressed as the hazard ratio. Nine eligible studies of 3355 patients were included in the review. The OS of patients who underwent LR was significantly longer than that of patients who underwent TACE (hazard ratio=0.52; 95% CI: 0.39-0.69; I2=79%). Prolonged survival following LR was confirmed after sensitivity analysis of five studies using propensity score matching (HR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.34-0.59; I2=55%). Patients with intermediate-stage HCC who underwent LR had a longer OS that those who underwent TACE. The role of LR in patients with BCLC stage B should be clarified in future randomised controlled trials.

Survival outcomes used to generate version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for anal cancer.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including anal cancer, is the standard for cancer staging in the United States. The AJCC staging criteria are dynamic, and periodic updates are conducted to optimize AJCC staging definitions through a panel of experts charged with evaluating new evidence to implement changes. With greater availability of large data sets, the AJCC has since restructured and updated its processes, incorporating prospectively collected data to validate stage group revisions in the version 9 AJCC staging system, including anal cancer. Survival analysis using AJCC eighth edition staging guidelines revealed a lack of hierarchical order in which stage IIIA anal cancer was associated with a better prognosis than stage IIB disease, suggesting that, for anal cancer, tumor (T) category has a greater effect on survival than lymph node (N) category. Accordingly, version 9 stage groups have been appropriately adjusted to reflect contemporary long-term outcomes. This article highlights the changes to the now published AJCC staging system for anal cancer, which: (1) redefined stage IIB as T1-T2N1M0 disease, (2) redefined stage IIIA as T3N0-N1M0 disease, and (3) eliminated stage 0 disease from its guidelines altogether.

Overall survival among patients who undergo resection does not differ significantly between T1a and T1b hepatocellular carcinoma based on the 8th American Joint Commission on Cancer.

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been used since 2018. However, whether any significant difference in overall survival (OS) exists between patients with T1a and T1b HCC who undergo resection has been controversial. We aim to clarify this issue. We consecutively enrolled newly diagnosed HCC patients who underwent liver resection (LR) from 2010 to 2020 at our institution. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Prognostic factors for OS were identified by multivariate analysis. This study enrolled 1250 newly diagnosed HCC patients who underwent LR. No significant differences in OS were identified between patients with T1a and T1b tumors among all patients (p = 0.694), cirrhotic patients (p = 0.753), non-cirrhotic patients (p = 0.146), patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 20ng/ml (p = 0.562), patients with AFP ≤ 20ng/ml (p = 0.967), patients with Edmondson grade 1 or 2 (p = 0.615), patients with Edmondson grade 3 or 4 (p = 0.825), patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg; p = 0.308), in patients positive for anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (p = 0.781), or patients negative for both HBsAg and anti-HCV antibody (p = 0.125). Using T1a as the reference, multivariate analysis showed that T1b is not a significant predictive factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.338; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.737-2.431; p = 0.339). No significant difference in OS was observed between patients who underwent LR to treat T1a and T1b HCC tumors.

Development and validation of a novel nomogram for postoperative overall survival of patients with primary gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: a population study based on SEER database.

Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) is a highly malignant subtype of gastric cancer. We tried to establish and validate a nomogram using common clinical variables to achieve more personalized management. We analyzed patients with GSRCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2017. The survival curve was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in survival curve was tested by log-rank test. We used the cox proportional hazard model to evaluate independent factors of prognosis, and established a nomogram to predict 1-, 3- and 5- overall survival (OS). Harrell's consistency index and calibration curve were used to measure the discrimination and calibration of the nomogram. In addition, we used decision curve analysis (DCA) to compare the net clinical benefits of the nomogram and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. The prognosis nomogram predicting 1-, 3- and 5-years OS for patients with GSRCC is established for the first time. The C-index and AUC of nomogram were higher than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in the training set. Our model also shows better performance than the AJCC staging system in the validation set, and importantly, DCA shows that our model has a better net benefit than the AJCC stage. We have developed and validated a new nomogram and risk classification system, which is better than the AJCC staging system. It will help clinicians manage postoperative patients with GSRCC more accurately.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system v2017: patient outcomes after treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma nodules with category 3-5 and category M.

To evaluate correlation between contrast-enhanced ultrasonography Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS; v. 2017) categories (LR 3-5 vs LR-M) and outcomes in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after initial therapy. In this retrospective study, 272 patients with high risks for HCC and solitary clinically or pathologically confirmed HCC were identified between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients were initially treated by resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system and were followed up until December 31, 2018. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between nodules assigned as LR 3-5 or LR M according to CEUS LI-RADS v. 2017 by using the Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. Early washout is the key determinating whether a nodule is classed as LR-M. Treatment procedures and LI-RADS category showed an independent correlation with OS and RFS (p < 0.05). LR 3-5 category were more correlated with better OS (88.6 months and 74.2 months, respectively; p = 0.017) compared with LR-M. Surgical resection demonstrated longer OS and RFS than RFA in LR-M patients and longer OS in LR 3-5 patients (p < 0.05). Besides, there was no significantly difference in OS and RFS between two categories in resection (p > 0.05), while for patients treated with RFA, LR 3-5 patients showed significant longer OS and RFS than LR-M patients (p < 0.05). Patients with HCC assigned as LR-M showed worse RFS and OS and surgical resection tended to be a more effective treatment for these patients. Putting forward a theory that CEUS LI-RADS categories could independently predict the outcome for patients with solitary HCC at early-stage after initial treatment.

Accuracy of models to prognosticate survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

Outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain difficult to prognosticate. Multiple models attempt to predict survival following the resection of PDAC, but their utility in the neoadjuvant population is unknown. We aimed to assess their accuracy among patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients who received NAC and underwent resection of PDAC. Two prognostic systems were evaluated: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Nomogram (MSKCCPAN) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Discrimination between predicted and actual disease-specific survival was assessed using the Uno C-statistic and Kaplan-Meier method. Calibration of the MSKCCPAN was assessed using the Brier score. A total of 448 patients were included. There were 232 (51.8%) females, and the mean age was 64.1 years (±9.5). Most had AJCC Stage I or II disease (77.7%). For the MSKCCPAN, the Uno C-statistic at 12-, 24-, and 36-month time points was 0.62, 0.63, and 0.62, respectively. The AJCC system demonstrated similarly mediocre discrimination. The Brier score for the MSKCCPAN was 0.15 at 12 months, 0.26 at 24 months, and 0.30 at 36 months, demonstrating modest calibration. Current survival prediction models and staging systems for patients with PDAC undergoing resection after NAC have limited accuracy.

Cervical cancer in the pregnant population

Cervical cancer is the second most encountered cancer in pregnant patients. The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer updated the staging of primary cervical carcinoma and disease process, with formal incorporation of imaging as a vital source of information in the management process to improve accuracy. Diagnosis and treatment of the pregnant population is a complex interplay of achieving adequate diagnostic information and optimal treatment while minimizing toxicity and risks to the mother and fetus. While novel imaging techniques and anticancer therapies are rapidly developed, much information on the safety and feasibility of different therapies is not yet available in the pregnant population. Therefore, managing pregnant patients with cervical cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Development of a prognostic nomogram and risk stratification system for upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The study aimed to develop a nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) and construct a risk stratification system of upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Newly diagnosed 568 patients with upper ESCC at Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital were taken as a training cohort, and additional 155 patients with upper ESCC from Sichuan Cancer Hospital Institute were used as a validation cohort. A nomogram was established using Cox proportional hazard regression to identify prognostic factors for OS. The predictive power of nomogram model was evaluated by using 4 indices: concordance statistics (C-index), time-dependent ROC (ROCt) curve, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). In this study, multivariate analysis revealed that gender, clinical T stage, clinical N stage and primary gross tumor volume were independent prognostic factors for OS in the training cohort. The nomogram based on these factors presented favorable prognostic efficacy in the both training and validation cohorts, with concordance statistics (C-index) of 0.622, 0.713, and area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.709, 0.739, respectively, which appeared superior to those of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Additionally, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of the nomogram presented better discrimination ability to predict survival than those of AJCC staging. Furthermore, decision curve analysis (DCA) of the nomogram exhibited greater clinical performance than that of AJCC staging. Finally, the nomogram fairly distinguished the OS rates among low, moderate, and high risk groups, whereas the OS curves of clinical stage could not be well separated among clinical AJCC stage. We built an effective nomogram model for predicting OS of upper ESCC, which may improve clinicians' abilities to predict individualized survival and facilitate to further stratify the management of patients at risk.

Tumor burden in patients with early and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver resection: a retrospective multicenter study on clinical and oncological outcomes

BackgroundAccording to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, liver resection (LR) is recommended for early-stage (BCLC-A) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but not for intermediate-stage (BCLC-B). This study aimed to assess the outcomes of LR in these patients using a subclassification tumour burden score (TBS). MethodsAll consecutive patients that underwent LR for BCLC-A and BCLC-B HCC between 01/2010 and 12/2020 in 4 tertiary referral centers were included. Clinical outcomes and overall survival (OS) were assessed in relation to TBS and BCLC stages. ResultsAmong 612 patients included, 562 were classified as BCLC-A and 50 as BCLC-B. The incidence of overall postoperative complications (56.0 vs 41.5%, p = 0.053) and mortality (0 vs 1.6%, p = 1.000) were similar between BCLC-A and BCLC-B patients. OS was significantly higher for BCLC A/low TBS than BCLC B/low TBS (p = 0.009), while patients with medium and high TBS had similar OS, irrespective of BCLC stage (respectively p = 0.103 and p = 0.343). ConclusionsPatients with medium and high TBS had comparable OS and DFS, irrespective of BCLC A or B stage, and postoperative morbidity was comparable. These results highlight the need for refinement of the BCLC staging system, and LR could be considered for selected intermediate stage (BCLC-B) according to the tumour burden.

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Overview of Challenges and Opportunities in Revising the Nodal Classification of Lung Cancer.

The status of lymph node involvement is a major component of the TNM staging system. The N categories for lung cancer have remained unchanged since the fourth edition of the TNM staging system, partly because of differences in nodal mapping nomenclature, partly because of insufficient details to verify possible alternative approaches for staging. In preparation for the rigorous analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer database necessary for the ninth edition TNM staging system, members of the N-Descriptors Subcommittee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee reviewed the evidence for alternative approaches to categorizing the extent of lymph node involvement with lung cancer, which is currently based solely on the anatomical location of lymph node metastasis. We reviewed the literature focusing on NSCLC to stimulate dialogue and mutual understanding among subcommittee members engaged in developing the ninth edition TNM staging system for lung cancer, which has been proposed for adoption by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control in 2024. The discussion of the range of possible revision options for the N categories, including the pros and cons of counting lymph nodes, lymph node stations, or lymph node zones, also provides transparency to the process, explaining why certain options may be discarded, others deferred for future consideration. Finally, we provide a preliminary discussion of the future directions that the N-Descriptors Subcommittee might consider for the 10th edition and beyond.

A review of 2022 Chinese clinical guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: updates and insights.

Significant improvements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during the past three years have urged the timely update of clinical guidelines in China. In brief, aMAP score is newly recommended as an effective risk stratification tool to predict HCC occurrence especially for non-cirrhotic patients. Biomarker-based surveillance including 7 micro-RNA panel and GALAD score are advocated to assist early diagnosis. China liver cancer (CNLC) staging system proposed in the 2017 guideline continues to be the standard model for staging with modifications in the treatment allocations. Conversion therapies using multi-modal, high intensity strategies are advocated to facilitate subsequent resection for patients with technically unresectable CNLC stage Ia, Ib, IIa HCC, or technically resectable IIb, IIIa HCC. Super-selective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with the assistance of Cone-Beam CT if necessary is recommended to guarantee the efficacy of TACE. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) regimen alone or in combination with systemic therapy is recommended for TACE-refractory patients or for patients with locally advanced HCC. The systemic treatments for HCC have evolved considerably since atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and suntilimab plus bevacizumab analogue showing superior survival benefit to sorafenib, and donafenib with comparable efficacy with sorafenib are added to the first-line treatments. In addition to regorafenib, apatinib, camrelizumab and tislelizumab are added as the second-line systemic therapies for patients who progressed on sorafenib. Updates in the 2022 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines and Japanese Society of Hepatology (JSH) consensus statement are also introduced and compared with the 2022 Chinese guidelines.

Image-guided percutaneous locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the 3rd leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Treatment options include surgical resection, liver transplantation, imageguided percutaneous locoregional options, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and systemic therapies. Treatment choice depends on the stage of the disease and patient's characteristics including performance status and liver function. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, with its recent 2022 update, is one of the most widely endorsed staging system. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are recommended for very early stage (BCLC-0), early stage (BCLC-A), and the two first subgroups of intermediate stage (BCLC-B). Image-guided percutaneous locoregional therapies include ablation, mainly thermal ablation with radiofrequency (RFA), microwave ablations (MWA) and cryoablation, transarterial embolization (TAE, also known as bland embolization), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluding beadstransarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), combination of ablation with embolization, transarterial radioembolization (TARE) also known as selective internal radioembolization therapy, and hepatic artery infusion (HAI). While ablation is recognized as a curative therapy, all intra-arterial therapies are considered non-curative options. There is growing evidence that TARE, through radiation segmentectomy, can be considered a curative intent treatment in appropriate selective patients. In this article, we will review indications, complications, and outcomes of locoregional therapies for HCC.

Global Assessment of Predictive Biomarkers in Malian BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients under Mono or Combination Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment: A Proposed Research Protocol

Background: According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, only the advanced stage (stage C) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient is eligible for systemic treatments. In addition to sorafenib and lenvatinib that represent the standard-of-care options in the first-line treatment, the multikinase inhibitors regorafenib and cabozantinib or ramucirumab, the anti-vascular-endothelial growth factor-2 (VEGF-R2) in the second-line setting but their poor tolerability have brought out the need for new therapeutic strategies, the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might represent the most important novelty and the future perspective also in the field of HCC. Therefore, the need to identify predictive biomarkers to select those patients who might actually benefit from ICIs-based treatment is urgently a challenge. Our central hypothesis is that the global assessment of predictive biomarkers could help patient-specific choices for ICIs treatment by developing simplified therapeutic algorithms and novel prognostic index for efficient HCC management. The primary aim of this work will be to globally assess predictive biomarkers in Malian patients with BCLC stage C HCC undergoing treatment with ICIs in mono or in combination.

Assessment of depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: a study protocol

Background:Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignancy of oral cavity. It remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity around the world. Overall OSCC represents more than 550,000 cases throughout the world yearly and the 6thleading cause of death. The mortality and rate of OSCC are higher in developing nations. About 25% patients with OSCC of tongue exist with occult metastasis at initial presentation. The utilization of TNM staging of OSCC to assess the clinical response to treatment and survival result is for many years. Prognosis of malignancy also depends on the histopathological grading of the OSCC. Histopathological assessment by measuring Depth of Invasion (DOI) enables us the insight about the extent of invasion by neoplastic cells. This observation will further be helpful for treatment management protocol particularly in OSCC of tongue. Hence, we aimed to assess the significance of DOI in the prognosis and clinicopathological features and survival of OSCC lesions in the current study.Methods:The surgically operated cases of OSCC of tongue from year 2009 to 2015 will be retrieved from the archival. Measurement of DOI will be carried out using Research microscope. The staging of the patients will be done according to the American Joint Committee of Cancer staging system. The present study will find DOI in tongue OSCC and its correlation with the clinicopathological features of OSCC of tongue and three years disease-specific survival.Conclusion:Measurement of the DOI ought to be included as a part of routine histological assessment. This likewise should be utilized for grading the tumor, which can further help in treatment management protocol.

Impact of microscopic extrathyroidal extension on differentiated thyroid cancer post-surgical risk of recurrence: a retrospective analysis

PurposeIn the last edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) showing microscopic extrathyroidal extension (mETE) are considered comparable to intrathyroidal cancers for their clinical behavior and prognosis. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of this updated assessment of T, when applied to the postoperative recurrence risk stratification, according to the American Thyroid Association Guidelines (ATA-RR).MethodsOne-hundred DTC patients who underwent total thyroidectomy were retrospectively evaluated. The downstaging of mETE was introduced in the definition of T, and the updated classification defined as modified ATA-RR (ATAm-RR). For each patient, post-surgical basal and stimulated thyroglobulin (Tg) levels, neck ultrasound (US) and post-ablative 131-I whole body scan (WBS) reports were considered. The predictive performance (PP) of disease recurrence was calculated both for each single parameter, as well as for all of them.ResultsAccording to ATAm-RR classification, 19/100 patients (19%) were downstaged. ATA-RR proved a significant PP for disease recurrence (DR) (sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 63.0%, p = 0.023). However, ATAm-RR performed slightly better due to an increased specificity (sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 83.7%, p < 0.001). For both classifications, the PP was optimal when all the above-mentioned predictive parameters were considered.ConclusionOur results suggest that the new assessment of T considering mETE resulted in a downgrading of ATA-RR class in a significant number of patients. This provides a better PP for disease recurrence, and the best PP was obtained when considering the whole predictive variables together.

Estimating postsurgical outcomes of patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: risk scoring system development and validation.

To develop and validate risk scoring systems using gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI features and clinical factors that predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) of a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Consecutive 295 patients with treatment-naïve single HCC who underwent curative surgery were retrospectively enrolled from two centers. Cox proportional hazard models developed risk scoring systems whose discriminatory powers were validated using external data and compared to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) or American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems using Harrell's C-index. Independent variables-tumor size (per cm; hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.13; p = 0.005), targetoid appearance (HR, 1.74; 95% CI: 1.07-2.83; p = 0.025), radiologic tumor in vein or tumor vascular invasion (HR, 2.59; 95% CI: 1.69-3.97; p < 0.001), the presence of a nonhypervascular hypointense nodule on the hepatobiliary phase (HR, 4.65; 95% CI: 3.03-7.14; p < 0.001), and pathologic macrovascular invasion (HR, 2.60; 95% CI: 1.51-4.48; p = 0.001)-with tumor markers (AFP ≥ 206ng/mL or PIVKA-II ≥ 419 mAU/mL) derived pre- and postoperative risk scoring systems. The risk scores showed comparably good discriminatory powers in the validation set (C-index, 0.75-0.82) and outperformed the BCLC (C-index, 0.61) and AJCC staging systems (C-index, 0.58; ps < 0.05). The preoperative scoring system stratified the patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk for recurrence, whose 2-year recurrence rate was 3.3%, 31.8%, and 85.7%, respectively. The developed and validated pre- and postoperative risk scoring systems can estimate RFS after surgery for a single HCC. • The risk scoring systems predicted RFS better than the BCLC and AJCC staging systems (C-index, 0.75-0.82 vs. 0.58-0.61; ps < 0.05). • Five variables-tumor size, targetoid appearance, radiologic tumor in vein or vascular invasion, the presence of a nonhypervascular hypointense nodule on the hepatobiliary phase, and pathologic macrovascular invasion-combined with tumor markers derived risk scoring systems predicting postsurgical RFS for a single HCC. • In the risk scoring system using preoperatively-available factors, patients were classified into three distinct risk groups, with 2-year recurrence rates in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups being 3.3%, 31.8%, and 85.7% in the validation set.

The impact of lymphovascular space invasion on survival in early stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer

BackgroundThe lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is suggested as a prognostic factor for endometrial cancer in many studies, but it has not yet been employed in FIGO staging system. The present study was aimed to evaluate the impact of LVSI on survival in patients with early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.MethodsThis retrospective cohort was conducted on early stage endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgical staging [total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO)] and omental biopsy at Referral Teaching Hospitals of Tehran from 2005 to 2021. Patient’s age, menopause status, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI and lower segment involvement were recorded. Data were analyzed with SPSS 22.Results415 patients with stage I and grade 1–2, endometrioid endometrial cancer were analyzed. 100 patients (24.1%) were LVSI-positive. 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 97.1% and 88.9%, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 53 patients (12.8%). 3-year overall survival rates in LVSI-negative and LVSI-positive were 98.7% and 92%. These rates for 5-year survival were 92.1% and 79%, respectively. Recurrence rates in LVSI-negative were 8.9% while it was 25% in LVSI-positive cases. Multivariate analysis showed that LVSI has significant correlation with 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates.ConclusionsLVSI in early stage endometrial cancer significantly and independently influences 3-year and 5-year survival rates and acts as a strong prognostic factor in these patients. LVSI should be implemented in endometrial cancer staging systems due to its significant correlation with cancer recurrence rates and 5-year survival rates.

Features of T1 pancreatic cancer and validation of the eighth edition AJCC staging system definition using a Korean-Japanese joint cohort and the SEER database.

Little is known about the features of T1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its definition in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system needs validation. The aims were to analyze the clinicopathologic features of T1 PDAC and investigate the validity of its definition. Data from 1506 patients with confirmed T1 PDAC between 2000 and 2019 were collected and analyzed. The results were validated using 3092 T1 PDAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The median survival duration of patients was 50 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 45.1%. R0 resection was unachievable in 10.0% of patients, the nodal metastasis rate was 40.0%, and recurrence occurred in 55.2%. The current T1 subcategorization was not feasible for PDAC, tumors with extrapancreatic extension (72.8%) had worse outcomes than those without extrapancreatic extension (median survival 107 vs. 39 months, p < .001). Extrapancreatic extension was an independent prognostic factor whereas the current T1 subcategorization was not. The results of this study were reproducible with data from the SEER database. Despite its small size, T1 PDAC displayed aggressive behavior warranting active local and systemic treatment. The subcategorization by the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system was not adequate for PDAC, and better subcategorization methods need to be explored. In addition, the role of extrapancreatic extension in the staging system should be reconsidered.

A Comprehensive Overview of In-patients Treated for Hepatocellular Carcinoma at a Tertiary Care Facility in Tanzania

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the commonest causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, only a limited number of studies on HCC have been conducted in Tanzania. We therefore conducted a cross-sectional study among in-patients treated for HCC in a tertiary referral hospital located in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, in order to provide a concise description of the clinical characteristics and treatment options offered in the study setting. We identified 36 in-patients treated for HCC over a 6-month data collection period. Seventy-seven percent (n = 28) of the participants were males and about two-thirds (61.2%) were aged between 40 and 60 years. Majority (44.4% [n = 16]) of the patients had Child-Pugh class B and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 (33.3% [n = 12]). Patients with tumors &gt;6.5 cm and multinodular tumors (&gt;3 nodules) accounted for 69.4% (n = 25) and 55.6% (n = 20), respectively. Portal vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis were respectively present in 27.8% (n = 10) and 25% (n = 9) of the patients. Of the study participants, only two had early-stage disease as per the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, corresponding to the observed tumor resection rate of 5.6%. The most frequently reported inoperable factor among the study participants was an ECOG performance status &gt; 0 (n = 30 [83.3%]). Findings thus reveal a high proportion of late-stage diseases among participants that could have resulted in the observed low tumor resection rate. Initiatives to facilitate identification of the disease at an early stage are therefore paramount in optimizing care.