Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy For Staging Research Articles

Alternatives and reduced need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) staging for melanoma

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced in the 1990s to identify patients who might benefit from completion lymph node dissection. Neither SLNB nor CLND improved survival, but SLNB staging did provide the best staging, above Breslow thickness and ulceration. The SLN status and SLN tumour burden were used in all trials until date looking at modern adjuvant systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or targeted therapies (TT). Adjuvant ICI and TT are shifting towards stage II melanoma. The question is whether there is still role for SLNB in melanoma, in this day and age, and if so, how does the future look for SLNB staging? The SLN status and SLN tumour burden might be useful for a consultation to discuss the number needed to treat in a risk/benefit discussion. For stage IIB/C patients, it seems likely, however, that patients will forego a nuclear scan followed by the risk of surgical intervention and morbidity associated with SLNB if they opt to receive adjuvant therapy regardless of the SLNB result. For stage I/IIA, it is still required to detect high-risk patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. However, biomarkers are emerging, such as gene expression profilers (GEP), immunohistological signatures and liquid biopsies with ctDNA. There still is a role for SLNB staging in melanoma today, but we expect that the availability of therapeutic option independent of SLNB status as well as emergence of validated biomarkers to predict risk will reduce the need for SLNB staging in the upcoming decade to the point it will no longer be used.

Differences in sentinel lymph node biopsy utilization in eligible melanoma patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision: A population-based logistic regression model and survival analysis

Primary melanoma management relies on tumor extirpation and staging sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in eligible patients. This study compares SLNB utilization in patients undergoing wide local excision (WLE) or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition≥patients with T1b melanoma undergoing WLE or MMS in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program were included. Propensity score matching was performed to compare patients who underwent MMS or WLE. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Fine-Gray cumulative incidence functions were used for overall and melanoma-specific survival. Eight hundred twenty-five MMS cases and 38,760 WLE cases were identified. SLNB was performed in 32.61% of MMS patients and 61.77% of WLE patients with positive rates of 12.5% and 14.82%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression of factors associated with SLNB utilization revealed that WLE, male gender, younger age, extremity location, and nodular and rare melanoma subtypes were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving SLNB whereas head and neck location and lentigo maligna melanoma subtype were significantly less likely to receive SLNB. Potential selection bias from a retrospective data set. Patients receiving WLE for≥T1b melanoma are more likely to receive a SLNB than patients undergoing MMS.

Validation of the Skåne University Hospital nomogram for the preoperative prediction of a disease-free axilla in patients with breast cancer.

BackgroundAxillary staging via sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed for clinically node-negative (N0) breast cancer patients. The Skåne University Hospital (SUS) nomogram was developed to assess the possibility of omitting SLNB for patients with a low risk of nodal metastasis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.74. The aim was to validate the SUS nomogram using only routinely collected data from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Breast Cancer at two breast cancer centres during different time periods.MethodThis retrospective study included patients with primary breast cancer who were treated at centres in Lund and Malmö during 2008–2013. Clinicopathological predictors in the SUS nomogram were age, mode of detection, tumour size, multifocality, lymphovascular invasion and surrogate molecular subtype. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Validation performance was assessed using AUC and calibration.ResultsThe study included 2939 patients (1318 patients treated in Lund and 1621 treated in Malmö). Node-positive disease was detected in 1008 patients. The overall validation AUC was 0.74 (Lund cohort AUC: 0.75, Malmö cohort AUC: 0.73), and the calibration was satisfactory. Accepting a false-negative rate of 5 per cent for predicting N0, a possible SLNB reduction rate of 15 per cent was obtained in the overall cohort.ConclusionThe SUS nomogram provided acceptable power for predicting a disease-free axilla in the validation cohort. This tool may assist surgeons in identifying and counselling patients with a low risk of nodal metastasis on the omission of SLNB staging.

Predictors of False Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Clinically Localized Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely recommended for clinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC); however, predictors of false negative (FN) SLNB are undefined. Patients from six centers undergoing wide excision and SLNB for stage I/II MCC (2005-2020) were identified and were classified as having either a true positive (TP), true negative (TN) or FN SLNB. Predictors of FN SLNB were identified and survival outcomes were estimated. Of 525 patients, 28 (5.4%), 329 (62.7%), and 168 (32%) were classified as FN, TN, and TP, respectively, giving an FN rate of 14.3% and negative predictive value of 92.2% for SLNB. Median follow-up for SLNB-negative patients was 27 months, and median time to nodal recurrence for FN patients was 7 months. Male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 3.15, p=0.034) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR 2.22, p=0.048) significantly correlated with FN, and increasing age trended toward significance (HR 1.04, p=0.067). The 3-year regional nodal recurrence-free survival for males >75 years with LVI was 78.5% versus 97.4% for females ≤75 years without LVI (p=0.009). Five-year disease-specific survival (90.9% TN vs. 51.3% FN, p<0.001) and overall survival (69.9% TN vs. 48.1% FN, p=0.035) were significantly worse for FN patients. Failure to detect regional nodal microscopic disease by SLNB is associated with worse survival in clinically localized MCC. Males, patients >75 years, and those with LVI may be at increased risk for FN SLNB. Consideration of increased nodal surveillance following negative SLNB in these high-risk patients may aid in early identification of regional nodal recurrences.

Abstract PS1-62: Two decades of experience with sentinel node staging of axilla - is false negative no longer a worry?

Abstract Aim: To review current literature and standard practices in various techniques of sentinel node biopsy for staging the axilla for treating early breast cancer. The purpose is to provide evidence based recommendation as guidance platform for optimal true sentinel node retrieval irrespective of surgeon expertise. Background: Axillary conservation is the way forward after game changing trials like ACOSOG Z0011, surrogate trials like IBCSG,AMAROS, ALMANAC, ongoing POSNOC, and newbie ATNEC have progressively or plan to decrease the need to unnecessarily fiddle with the axilla thereby increasing the chances of arm related and other morbidities. Axillary sentinel node biopsy entails retrieval of first draining lymph node in the breast-axilla pathway to plan treatment in breast cancer by appropriate staging of axilla. Current standard is the utilisation of double agent technique with radioactive isotope and blue dye injection to decrease false negative rates for true sentinel node retrieval. Novel techniques like magnetic and infrared tracing are still being investigated for validation. Method: PMC, Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane library searched for clinical trials, randomised trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis on techniques of axillary sentinel node biopsy in early breast cancer. This covered the last 25 years literature on the topic. Results: The search yielded 197 publications which were subjected to a meticulous review and narrowed to a select pertinent body of evidence to extrapolate suggested guidance rationally, the bibliography of which is provided at the end. Conclusion: Single agent preferably radioisotope for lymphatic mapping is recommended in palpable and good biology tumours. Use of single agent blue dye can be standardised in axillary tail tumours. It is also recommended as being effective when isotope mapping is logistically not feasible or during pandemics like COVID 19 where looming infrastructure challenges are prevalent. Dual agent technique should be considered in previously treated breast and axilla, neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort, bad tumour biology, high BMI and macromastia groups for true nodal retrieval. Optimal number of nodes taken out should not be more than three (n=3). Lower axillary sampling of not more than 3 nodes is recommended for troubleshooting with any localising agent technique. Triple site injection at peri-tumoural, subcutaneous and sub areolar regions and larger volume of blue dye agent injection of up to 8mls increases the localisation success in the dual technique group for lymphatic mapping. Magnetic tracing can be used as an adjunct to either single agent radioactive isotope or blue dye (RI/BD) technique when there is failure to localise the sentinel node. Citation Format: Tahera Arif, Mohammed Shamim Absar. Two decades of experience with sentinel node staging of axilla - is false negative no longer a worry? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-62.

The value of lymph node ultrasound and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT in stage IIB/C melanoma patients prior to SLNB

BackgroundStage IIB/IIC (8th AJCC) melanoma patients are known to have high-risk primary tumors, however they follow the same routine to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as more low risk tumors. Guidelines are not conclusive regarding the use of preoperative imaging for these patients. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the value of ultrasound (US) and 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) and SLNB for stage IIB/C melanoma patients. MethodsFrom 2019-04 till 2020–01, all stage IIB/C melanoma patients underwent US of the regional lymph nodes and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT before their planned LSG and SLNB. Suspected metastases were confirmed with fine needle aspiration (FNA), prior to surgery. ResultsIn total 23 patients were screened: six had metastases detected by imaging, two by US, one by 18F-FDG PET/CT and three were detected by both imaging modalities. All metastases were nodal and therefore treatment was altered to lymph node dissection and all but one also received adjuvant therapy. Eight (47%) of the 17 patients without macroscopic disease, still had a positive SN. Sensitivity, specificity and false negative rate for US and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 36%, 89%, 64% and 29%, 100% and 71%, respectively. ConclusionPreoperative negative imaging does not exclude the presence of SN metastases, therefore SLNB cannot be foregone. However, US detected metastases in 22% of patients, altering their treatment, which suggests it is effective in the work-up of stage IIB/C melanoma. Staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT is not of added value prior to LSG and SLNB and should therefore not be used.

Sentinel node occult lesion localization technique for impalpable breast cancer.

Mammographic screening has enabled earlier detection of breast cancer, with 25-35% of malignancies being non-palpable at diagnosis. Accurate removal and sentinel node biopsy for staging these lesions are crucial to successful management. Both these aspects are achieved by peritumoural localization with radioisotope and lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping using the sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique. This study reports SNOLL outcomes in a large cohort of women with non-palpable breast cancers to assess its performance and promote its logistic advantages. This retrospective cohort study used data from BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit supplemented with private case notes. Inclusion criteria were females >18 years, with invasive breast cancer that was asymptomatic and non-palpable at presentation, who underwent SNOLL (n = 450). Primary outcomes were proportion of successful lesion localization, proportion of patients requiring re-excision and volume of tissue excised. Secondary outcomes focused on lymphoscintigraphy success rate in detecting sentinel nodes and SN positivity rates. Tumours were successfully removed with the initial SNOLL procedure in 449 cases (99.8%). The re-excision rate was 15.1% (n = 68). The mean total excision volume was 54.69 cm3 (95% CI 51.49-57.88 cm3 ; range 2.75-195.33 cm3 ), with a mean closest circumferential margin of 7.05 mm (95% CI 6.60-7.49 mm; range 0 to ≥10 mm). Lymphoscintigraphy was successful in 96.9% (n = 436) of cases. Sentinel nodes were successfully identified and removed in 99.6% (n = 448) of cases. SN positivity rate was 18.4%. SNOLL is an efficient and effective technique for localizing non-palpable invasive breast lesions while simultaneously identifying sentinel nodes.

Patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma, particularly elderly with more advanced primary tumors, seem to benefit from initial CT staging before considering a sentinel lymph node biopsy

Background: The role of CT scanning at the time of diagnosis for patients with primary cutaneous head and neck melanoma (cHNM) clinically asymptomatic for metastatic disease remains unclear.Aim: To determine the positive yield of initial CT scanning before considering sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) staging.Materials and methods: A retrospective review was performed on 170 consecutive patients with cHNM referred to a tertiary head and neck academic center for SLNBs from 2014 through 2018.Results: Initial CTs identified occult melanoma metastases in 7.1% and other advanced malignancies in 4.7%. The overall CT yield for patients >65 years (n = 115) was 13.9%, and 5.5% for patients <65 (only occult melanoma metastases). The SLNB yield did not differ between older (11.5%) and younger patients (10.2%). Patients with more advanced primary tumors were upstaged more often by both staging procedures. Multivariate analysis indicated a true-positive CT finding as the strongest prognostic factor for OS (p<.001).Conclusions and significance: The CT yield was >11% and higher for older than for younger patients. The findings suggest that CT imaging may be considered before SLNB staging, potentially identifying metastatic melanoma disease as well as other occult malignancies, enabling especially older patients to bypass the SLNB procedure.

The value of lymph node ultrasound and whole body PET/CT in stage IIB/C patients prior to SLNB.

e22079 Background: Stage IIB/IIC (pT3b-T4N0) patients are known to have high-risk primary tumors, even higher risk than some stage IIIA/B melanomas (AJCC Staging System 8th edition), however they follow the same routine to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as more low-risk tumors. A priori the risk of finding SLNB or other metastases is much higher for these thick and/or ulcerated primary melanomas compared to the thinner ones. Guidelines are not conclusive regarding the use of preoperative imaging in these cases. Recently, a trend to more frequently use cross-sectional imaging has been noticed. However, others have previously shown that preoperative ultrasound was the most sensitive. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the value of ultrasound (US) and Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography (PET/CT) prior to SLNB for stage IIB/C (pT3b-T4N0) melanoma patients. Methods: Starting 2019-04, all patients with a pT3b melanoma or higher (8th AJCC) were included. All patients underwent US and PET/CT before their planned lymphoscintigraphy and routine SLNB. Suspected metastases were confirmed with cytologic puncture. Results: A total of 20 patients were screened. Seven patients (35%) had metastases detected by imaging: one by PET/CT, three by US and three by both imaging modalities. Three of these metastases were detected by US as well as PET/CT. All metastases were nodal. For all seven patients treatment was altered to lymph node dissection with adjuvant therapy. Of the 13 patients in whom no metastases were identified by imaging, six (46%) still had a positive sentinel node (SN). Conclusions: This study showed that this select group of patients had a high risk of metastases prior to SLNB and that all recurrences except one, were detected by ultrasound. This suggests that nodal staging with US is sufficient and can replace the need for SLNB when metastases is proven with cytology. Despite negative imaging, SLNB cannot be foregone for pT3b-pT4N0 melanoma patients, as many still have an involved SN. Cross-sectional imaging can be reserved for patients after positive cytology or SN to confirm the absence of distant visceral metastases.

Increase of sentinel lymph node melanoma staging in The Netherlands; still room and need for further improvement.

Aim:To investigate implementation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and associations with socioeconomic status (SES).Patients & methods:Data from The Netherlands Cancer Registry on patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed for all stage IB–II melanoma cases diagnosed 2010–2016, along with SES data from The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Results:The proportion of SLNB-staged patients increased from 40% to 65% (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that being female, elderly, or having head-and-neck disease reduced the likelihood of SLNB staging.Conclusion:SLNB staging increased by 25% during the study period but lagged among elderly patients and those with head-and-neck melanoma. In The Netherlands, SES no longer affects SLNB staging performance.

Economic impact of the 31-gene expression profile test in the Medicare-eligible population with cutaneous melanoma.

6630 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended as a staging procedure for patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM), but SLNB is associated with additional surgical risks and costs. The SLN positivity rate is approximately 12-16% overall and varies by age. Older patients have lower SLN positivity rates despite a higher metastatic rate. A 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test classifies 5-year metastatic risk (Classes 1A [lowest risk], 1B, 2A, and 2B [highest risk]), including SLN metastasis. As previously demonstrated using a large multicenter database, patients with Class 1A, T1-T2 (≤2.0 mm thickness) CM have an overall SLN positivity likelihood &lt; 5%, below the NCCN guideline threshold for SLNB. The aim of this study was to determine the relative cost impact of patient management via traditional care versus using the 31-GEP test to guide SLNB and surveillance plans for 16,572 patients ≥65 years (Medicare-eligible) with T1-T2 CM who are SLNB-eligible. Methods: Decision tree models were used to compare management strategies (surveillance, SLNB) according to traditional care based on SLNB staging and with 31-GEP test utilization. Models used T category from AJCC TNM staging guidelines and SEER data for incidence estimations. Model outcomes included total Medicare costs of melanoma treatment and patient management. Cost impact of the 31-GEP test was calculated based on the difference in Medicare costs between the traditional care and 31-GEP test paradigms. Results: Under the paradigm in which the 31-GEP guided SLNB and surveillance in patients ≥65 years with T1-T2 CM who are eligible for SLNB, 11,157 fewer SLNBs would be performed per year, a 67% reduction in SLNB procedures in this population. This would result in a net annual cost savings of $68M, a 31% reduction in total costs. Use of the 31-GEP testing to guide surveillance in patients ≥65 with T3-T4 melanoma, in addition to T1-T2 melanoma, were also analyzed and also demonstrated a reduction in costs. Conclusions: Results from this study suggest that using the 31-GEP test to guide SLNB and surveillance offers substantial cost savings compared to traditional care for Medicare-eligible patients.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a technical and clinical appraisal.

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Regional lymph node status is one of the strongest predictors of long-term prognosis in primary breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection as the standard surgical procedure for staging clinically tumor-free regional nodes in patients with early-stage breast cancer. SLNB staging considerably reduces surgical morbidity in terms of shoulder dysfunction and lymphedema, without affecting diagnostic accuracy and prognostic information. Clinicians should not recommend axillary lymph node dissection for women with early-stage breast cancer who have tumor-free findings on SLNB because there is no advantage in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. Starting from the early 1990s, SLNB has increasingly been used in breast cancer management, but its role is still debated under many clinical circumstances. Moreover, there is still a lack of standardization of the basic technical details of the procedure that is likely to be responsible for the variability found in the false-negative rate of the procedure (5.5-16.7%). In this article, we report the aspects of SLNB that are well established, those that are still debated, and the advancements that have taken place over the last 20 years. We have provided an update on the methodology from both a technical and a clinical point of view in the light of the most recent publications.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy staging for cutaneous malignant melanoma of the head and neck

Conclusion Sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) can be performed safely and with reasonable accuracy in HNM patients. The outcome provides important prognostic information concerning DFS and further treatment. However, one must recognize that SLNB is a multidisciplinary procedure with a learning curve for all. Objectives To evaluate efficacy of performing SLNBs in a series of consecutive patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma (HNM) ≥ T1b from introduction of the procedure and 10 years onward. Method End-points comprised of SLNB outcome, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results SNs were harvested in 128 of 160 patients (median Breslow = 2.0 mm, 29% ulcerated); success rate = 80.0%, or 92.1% if excluding patients where SLNBs were omitted due to non-localization on pre-operative imaging or because of SN-location in the parotid basin. Ten patients (7.8%) had positive SLNBs and were offered early completion neck dissections. Of the 146 patients available for follow-up (median = 27 months), 15.8% had recurrent disease. The risk of a regional nodal recurrence after a negative SLNB was 7.5%. SN-negative patients had improved DFS c.f. SN-positive patients (p < 0.001). A positive SLNB was the most important prognostic predictor of decreased DFS (hazard ratio = 5.70; p < 0.005), but had no significant impact on OS.

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma (Breslow Thickness ≤ 0.75 mm and 0.76 mm - 1.0 mm Respectively): Our Results and Review of the Literature

Introduction: The Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma is an important tool of staging. The impact on overall survival still remains unclear. The guidelines in regard to depth, taking in mind where SLNB staging benefits do not outweigh the risks of the procedure, are constantly reviewed and modified. Patients and Methods: From 2010 to 2015, 104 patients with thin melanoma Stage IA with presence of adverse or high risk features and from IB only TIb, N0, M0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer, AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification 7th Edition 2009) were included and divided into 2 groups: Group A: 68 patients with Breslow ≤ 0.75 mm and Group B: 36 patients with Breslow 0.76 - 1.0 mm. Initially all patients underwent excision of the primary site and subsequently wide local excision and SLNB. We analyzed the histopathology reports of SLNB procedures in both groups. Results: There was no positive SLN in group A (0%). 4 patients from group B had positive SLN (11.1%) and underwent Completion Lymph Node Dissection (CLND). The total percentage of positive SLNs from both groups was 3.8%. Conclusions: Our findings justify the SLNB procedure in thin melanomas of 0.76 - 1.0 mm. In melanomas ≤ 0.75 mm, SLNB should be considered on an individual basis when “high-risk features” are present. More comparable studies should be evaluated in order to accurately define the threshold value of Breslow thickness where SLNB is safely deemed unnecessary.

Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy, in cutaneous melanoma staging and treatment decisions.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted method in the management of clinically localized cutaneous melanomas. The aim of this study was to report the results on patients scheduled for preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB for staging and further treatment planning. Two hundred and one patients (115 male and 86 female, median age 57 years, range 9-81) with cutaneous melanoma having undergone SLB at Military Medical Academy between November 2010 and October 2014, were recruited for retrospective study. Dual labeling method (Tc-99m Nanocolloid (blue dye) was used. In order to delineate the relation between patients' tumors and scintigraphic characteristics with positive SLN findings, we examined all variables by univariate logistic regression with odd ratios representing the size effect. The overall identification rate of SLN was 98.5%. One or more positive SLN were seen in 47 (23.4%) of the patients. Drainage to one regional basin was noticed in 176 (88%) and multiple drainage regions, up to three, was noticed in 24 patients (12%). Transit lymph nodes were detected in 20 patients (10%). The characteristics that were assotiated significatly with sentinel lymph node metastases were Breslow thickness, nodular melanoma histological subtype and acral localization. Besides the well established primary tumor thickness being a predictor of SLN malignancy, we observed: acral body site location and nodular melanoma histological subtype to be significant independent factors in increasing the risk for regional metastases. Our results suport the clinical usefulness of SLNB within a multidisciplinary approach (dermatooncology, plastic/head and neck surgery, pathology, nuclear medicine), as a reliable method in staging and for treatment planning in melanoma patients.

Unmet needs related to quality of life: Questionnaire-based survey in a breast cancer patient follow-up program

Unmet needs related to quality of life: Questionnaire-based survey in a breast cancer patient follow-up program

Challenges and Variables Affecting the Success of Sentinel Lymph Node Biospy in Malignant Melanoma a 4-Year Analysis of Clinical Results

Summary In the last 15 years, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with malignant melanoma (MM) has been introduced into the clinical practice. Our aim was to make a retrospective analysis of clinical results in order to assess the success ratio of SLNB and the variables affecting it in MM patients, treated in the Oncology Center at the University Hospital “Dr George Stranski” - Pleven, Bulgaria for a 4-year period. A research index card was used to process the oncologic files of 82 out of 102 patients with MM, treated and monitored at the Oncology centre between 01.01.2008 and 31.12.2011. TNM-stages, Breslow and Clark levels, location, characteristics of the skin lesion, diagnostic excision, type of lymph node dissection, number of SLN, localization of SLN, etc. were registered in the index card. SLNB staging was carried out in 28 patients. Sentinel lymph nodes were found in 22 of them. The success ratio of the method was 78.6%. Histologically, metastatic SLN were found in 4 cases. The Patent Blue Dye method was used in 22 of the cases (78%). A combined radiocolloid and dye method was used in 5 cases (18%). A radiocolloid method was used in 1 case (4%) only. Our research showed that more therapeutic lymph node dissections were performed in cases of locally advanced MM, which in turn worsened the clinical results. According to our research, the SLNB success ratio depends on the precision of diagnostic excision (p=0.019), lesion location (p=0.015), Clark level (p=0.0229), mapping method (p=0.08) and the type of melanoma (p=0.088).

A 10-year, single-institution analysis of clinicopathologic features and sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanomas

The 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria for thin cutaneous melanomas recommend staging sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) for select stage IB tumors. SLNB in this population remains controversial because of low rates of node positivity and inconsistent prognostic parameters. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between multiple clinicopathologic features and SLNB result, and clinical outcome. Clinical and pathologic parameters from patients with melanomas less than or equal to 1.00 mm receiving wide local excision with SLNB at our institution from 2001 through 2010 were recorded. Analysis for any statistically significant relationships between recorded parameters and SLN results and outcome were performed. A total of 189 cases yielded 3 positive SLNBs (1.6%). Disease progression occurred in 6 cases (3.2%). Positive SLNB predicted distant metastasis and death from disease (P= .0017). Mitotic rate was not associated with a positive SLNB result. The follow-up time for this study was limited (mean= 40.7 months). Our data confirm a statistically significant relationship between SLNB result and likelihood for distant metastasis in thin melanoma. There was a trend for a relationship between mitotic rate and clinical outcome. This relationship reached statistical significance at a mitotic rate of greater than 3 mitoses/mm(2).

Status of Sentinel Lymph Node for Breast Cancer

Long-awaited results from randomized clinical trials designed to test the validity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as replacement of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in management of early breast cancer have recently been published. All the trials conclude SLNB has survival rates comparable to those of ALND (up to 10 years in one study) and conclude SLNB has less morbidity than ALND. All the trials support replacing ALND with SLNB for staging in early breast cancer; all support SLNB as the standard of care for such cancer. The SLNB protocols used in the trials varied, and no consensus that would suggest a standard protocol exists. The results of the trials and of other peer-reviewed research do, however, suggest a framework for including some specific methodologies in accepted practice. This article highlights the overall survival and disease-free survival data as reported from the clinical trials. This article also reviews the status of SLN procedures and the following: male breast cancer, the roles of various imaging modalities (single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and ultrasound), ductal carcinoma in situ, extra-axillary SLNs, SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation exposure to patients and medical personnel, and a new radiotracer that is the first to label SLNs not by particle trapping but by specific macrophage receptor binding. The proper Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for lymphoscintigraphy and SLN localization prior to surgery is 78195.

How to analyze the diagnostic value of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck cancer

In an attempt to more reliably select the lymph nodes that potentially contain metastases, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept has been introduced. This has been studied extensively in melanoma and breast cancer, but was recently introduced in the staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The SLN is likely to be the first lymph node to harbour metastasis and can be used to provide information on the rest of the nodal basin. The SLN is usually identified by peritumoural injection of radioactive colloid and a blue dye. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative visualization of blue coloration and intraoperative radionuclide detection using a gamma probe allow identification of the SLN. After surgical removal, this SLN is investigated by meticulous histopathological examination using stepped serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry. If the SLN contains metastatic tumour cells, treatment of the neck is recommended, usually in a second procedure [1]. The SLN procedure is considered to be more precise than imaging procedures and less invasive than elective neck dissection. Moreover, it is associated with significantly less postoperative morbidity and better shoulder function as compared with elective neck dissection [2]. Current best practice guidelines for the provision of SLN biopsy (SLNB) in early OSCC patients have been outlined, which provide a framework for the currently evolving recommendations for its use [3]. The sentinel node concept in OSCC has been validated in several studies in which in all patients after SLNB, a neck dissection was performed. The histopathological examination of the neck dissection specimen was used as reference (gold) standard. Although several European studies had validated the sentinel node concept in OSCC, an American multicenter validation study was initiated in which routine histopathological examination of the neck dissection specimen was used as gold standard. This American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0360 validation study with 140 patients in 25 institutions showed a sensitivity of 90 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96 % [4]. Because routine histopathological examination (and not step-serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry) of the neck dissection specimen was used as the gold standard occult micrometastases might have been missed [5], potentially contributing to higher figures for sensitivity and negative predicting value. After initial studies to validate the SLN concept in early OSCC patients, several small prospective observational studies have been reported. In these studies, a neck dissection was performed only when the SLN contained a metastasis and a watchful waiting strategy was followed when the SLN was tumour-free. Two larger single centre studies found sensitivities and NPVs above 90 % [6, 7]. In an European multicenter study [8] of 134 cT1/2N0 OSCC patients 79 patients underwent SLNB as the sole staging tool, while 55 patients underwent SLNB followed by elective neck dissection (END). For the two groups together, using a reference standard of 5 years follow-up after SLNB staging, a sensitivity of 91 % and a NPV of 95 % were found. The better performance of the SLNB-assisted END group (sensitivity 96 %, NPV 97 %) compared to the SLNB-alone group (sensitivity 87 %, NPV 94 %) can be explained by the use of standard (routine) histopathological examination of the neck dissection specimen versus 5 years follow-up as a gold standard for metastasis [8]. R. de Bree (&) Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: r.bree@vumc.nl