Staging Of Chronic Pancreatitis Research Articles

Pancreatic Fibrosis and Chronic Pancreatitis: Mini-Review of Non-Histologic Diagnosis for Clinical Applications.

Pancreatic fibrosis is the dominant reversible pathological change and diagnostic factor in early chronic pancreatitis, defined by a mechanistic approach proposed in 2016. Main guidelines for chronic pancreatitis were published by the American Pancreas Association in 2014, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology in 2015, and United European Gastroenterology in 2017. All three sets of guidelines mentioned that the staging of chronic pancreatitis is important but challenging. There are various image modalities for the non-histologic diagnosis of pancreatic fibrosis: (1) shear wave elastography, such as an acoustic radiation force impulse with a cut-off value of 1.4 m/s; (2) strain elastography using grades of strain; (3) endoscopic ultrasonography using the Rosemont criteria or endoscopic ultrasound criteria for early chronic pancreatitis proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society; (4) computed tomography using the Hounsfield scale or number of micro-calcifications; and (5) magnetic resonance imaging using the apparent diffusion coefficient and the T1w flash and T2w HASTE sequences. The clinical applications are to (1) evaluate pancreatic tumors and inflammatory disease; (2) monitor dyspepsia with early chronic pancreatitis; (3) monitor individuals with a high risk of pancreatic cancer; (4) analyze a fatty pancreas with fibrosis; (5) predict a fistula after pancreatic surgery; and (6) predict outcomes for chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer. The selection of tools will be dependent on the clinical scenario. Conclusion: There are various modalities for the non-histologic diagnosis of pancreatic fibrosis. The selection of the optimal device will be dependent on the clinical scenario.

Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: The Evolution of Diagnostic Criteria for a Rare Disease

Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: The Evolution of Diagnostic Criteria for a Rare Disease

Chronic pancreatitis: which is the role of 320-row CT for the staging?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of multi-planar and volumetric reconstructions obtained from isotropic data by using 16-slice computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis. In a group of 42 patients CT images were evaluated searching for alterations in morphology and structure of the pancreas, alterations of the Wirsung duct, dilatation of the bile ducts, fluid collections, and vascular involvement of the digestive tract. The disease was then staged in mild, moderate and severe and correlated with the clinical staging. CT allowed the recognition of chronic pancreatitis in all cases. The staging was correct in 25/42 patients, with an accuracy rate of 59.5%. In the staging of moderate and severe forms, CT correlation with clinical and laboratory data was valid, but in mild forms it appeared less significant. Multi-detector CT is accurate in the recognition of moderate, advanced forms of chronic pancreatitis and in the identification of its complications, while it is poorly correlated with the clinical staging in mild forms of the disease.

Mo1554 Does Hyperechoic Findings on B-Mode EUS Reflect Fibrous Changes in Patient With Chronic Pancratitis, True of Fake? -Evaluation Using EUS Elastography-

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential tool for the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis (CP). EUS can visualize several characteristic findings including hyperechoic foci (HF), hyperechoic strand (HS), lobularity and hyperechoic ductal margin (HEDM), and these findings are thought to show elastic changes of pancreas parenchyma. However, the interpretation of these findings is still controversial. EUS elastography can analyze the tissue stiffness. In this study, to assess whether the hyperechoic EUS abnormalities on B-mode image are reflected the fibrous change/stiffness, we compared the parenchymal/ductal hyperechoic findings on conventional gray-scale B-mode scan to the EUS elastography.

Elastografía en la evaluación de la pancreatitis crónica

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential tool in the evaluation of pancreatic disease and can be considered the technique of choice for the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic cancer (PC). However, EUS has certain limitations, especially in the evaluation of patients with solid pancreatic masses (in the differential diagnosis of CP and PC). Furthermore there is variability in the EUS diagnostic criteria for CP. EUS-guided elastography is emerging as a highly useful tool in this setting. This modality has shown high diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses, including differentiation between CP and PC. EUS-guided elastography has also been found to be useful in the diagnosis of CP, and can even classify patients according to the severity of their disease.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis – comparison with other morphological (conventional ultrasonography and CT) and functional investigations (fecal elastase test)

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis – comparison with other morphological (conventional ultrasonography and CT) and functional investigations (fecal elastase test)

Indirect Pancreatic Function Tests in Children

Indirect Pancreatic Function Tests in Children

Clinical evaluation of the faecal elastase test in the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis.

To test the diagnostic accuracy of faecal elastase (FE), a new test of exocrine pancreatic function, in a large prospective population of patients with abdominal complaints. Between January 1994 and December 1995, 131 patients (age range 17-82 years) were submitted for exocrine pancreatic function testing. Sixty-three patients had a firm diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP) at stage I-III according to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Twenty patients suffered from other pancreatic diseases (PD), and 48 patients had various other gastrointestinal diseases (GD). Fifty-seven healthy controls (HC) were also investigated. Stool specimens were analysed for FE by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and for faecal chymotrypsin (FC). The pancreolauryl serum test (PLT) was also performed in 97 patients and 23 healthy controls. FE was 200; 45-500 micrograms/g (median; range) in CP-I (n = 19), 94; 0-400 micrograms/g in CP-II (n = 14) and 38; 0-135 micrograms/g in CP-III patients (n = 30). With a cutoff of 200 micrograms/g, abnormal test results were found in 47% of CP-I, 79% of CP-II and 100% of CP-III patients; in 30% of PD patients, in 38% of GD patients and in 7% of HC. Sensitivity of abnormal FE in diagnosing CP was 79% (FC: 48%; PLT: 71%). The specificity of only 62% (FC: 73%; PLT: 67%) in the GD group increased to 78% (FC: 81%; PLT: 77%) when patients with small bowel diseases and diarrhoea (n = 22) were excluded. Faecal elastase is more sensitive than chymotrypsin and comparable to the pancreolauryl test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Indirect exocrine pancreatic function tests are not helpful to differentiate between pancreatic and small bowel diseases in a prospective population of patients with abdominal complaints.

The problem of classification and staging of chronic pancreatitis. Proposals based on current knowledge of its natural history.

Even though the four international meetings held so far on classification of pancreatitis have helped considerably to further our understanding of the disease, all have serious drawbacks that limit their clinical utility. The main problem with the Marseille classifications is the need for histologic proof, and the Cambridge classification relies on imaging modalities that are not sensitive or specific enough. Chronic pancreatic inflammation (CP) has been observed in association with several systemic diseases (such as autoimmune diseases), and since the natural history of the pancreatic affliction in these conditions is clearly distinct from that seen in other forms of CP, these need to be classified separately. Furthermore, many clinical/aetiologic forms of chronic calcifying pancreatitis (CCP) exist which differ sufficiently in their clinical features and management to deserve individual recognition. A subclassification of CCP into alcoholic, tropical, hereditary, hypercalcaemic, hyperlipoproteinaemic, drug-induced, and idiopathic is proposed. The staging of chronic alcoholic pancreatitis has been a controversial issue, mainly because of the apparent unpredictability of the course of pain. However, several large follow-up studies in the past decade suggest that recurrent acute exacerbations dominate the clinical picture in the first few years after onset of symptoms, and progressive pancreatic insufficiency is the predominant feature in the late stages of the disease. On the basis of the results of these studies it is proposed that alcoholic chronic pancreatitis be divided into four stages: I) latent or subclinical, II) early, or stage of inflammatory complications, III) late, or stage of severe pancreatic insufficiency, and IV) advanced, or stage of secondary painless pancreatitis.

Chronic Pancreatitis: Diagnosis and Staging

Diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis is based on patient history, clinical findings, and various diagnostic tools. Usually, a combination of both, investigations of pancreatic function and pancreatic structure are necessary for an accurate diagnosis. This paper gives an overview of the most widely used function tests (PABA Test, Pancreolauryl Test, Secretin Test) and the various imaging techniques (plain X-ray, ultrasound, CT scan, ERCP). Currently, ERCP is the most sensitive method for analyzing the structure of the pancreatic duct system and it provides valuable information for the selection of patients who may benefit from surgical or endoscopic therapy.

Ratios of different serum pancreatic enzymes in the diagnosis and staging of chronic pancreatitis.

The aim of this study was to define an optimum serum enzyme ratio for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and for the evaluation of the stage of the disease. With this goal in mind, a simultaneous and interrelated analysis of different serum pancreatic enzymes was performed in 296 consecutive patients with clinically suspected CP. A total of 167 patients were finally diagnosed with CP and 129 with other digestive diseases (used as controls). Serum values of pancreatic amylase, lipase, immunoreactive trypsin, and their ratios were determined in every patient before final diagnosis was established. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed. As expected, abnormally low values of individual serum pancreatic enzymes in the diagnosis of CP were highly specific (92-98%) but very insensitive (20-32%). Their diagnostic usefulness was neither improved by calculation of their ratios nor by the use of multivariate logistic regression analysis. A low pancreatic amylase/lipase ratio correlated with advanced CP (p < 0.01), and had a high degree of accuracy (80.5%) in the evaluation of the stage of the disease (assessed by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography). In conclusion, while serum pancreatic enzymes have limited usefulness in the diagnosis of CP, the pancreatic amylase/lipase ratio could be a simple method for staging the disease.