Obstetric Staff Research Articles

Maternity Care Is Increasingly Hard to Find in Rural Areas.

Hospital closings and scarce obstetrical staff undermine access.

A Study on the Construction of a Core Midwife-Led Total Maternal Care Program for High-Risk Pregnancies

Objective: To analyze the care needs of high-risk pregnant women during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum hospitalization. Additionally, to gather obstetrics staff’s suggestions for improving a total care program with core midwives leading. Methods: The study conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 high-risk pregnant women and 10 obstetricians at a tertiary hospital from August 2021 to October 2022. A descriptive qualitative study assessed their care needs and current care models. An evidence-based approach was used to evaluate guidelines and develop a draft care plan. Finally, the Delphi method refined the core midwife-led total care program. Results: The study formulated a draft for a core midwife-led care program, integrating literature and expert feedback. This program defined midwife roles with 7 service standards and 6 qualification standards. The care practice included 3 level 1, 19 level 2, and 58 level 3 entries. Management of common risk factors had detailed entries for conditions like gestational diabetes, advanced maternal age, abnormal early pregnancy weight, hypertensive disorders, and scarred uterus. Conclusion: The study offers a qualitative exploration of high-risk pregnant women’s care needs and suggests improvements based on healthcare professionals’ experiences. It provides a foundation for a midwife-led care program and proposes new research directions. The methodology combines the Ottawa research application model, evidence-based approaches, and theoretical analysis to support this program’s development.

A survey of obstetric and gynaecology doctors at an Australian metropolitan tertiary hospital to understand their views, training and confidence in abortion care.

The barriers to comprehensive abortion care in Australian metropolitan tertiary hospitals are under-researched. Previous work has suggested that negative practitioner attitudes and lack of training may play a large role; however, this remains poorly understood. The aim was to survey doctors practicing obstetrics and gynaecology to better understand their views, training experience and confidence in abortion care. The method involved a cross-sectional study via an anonymous survey at a single metropolitan tertiary hospital not providing substantive abortion services in Melbourne, Australia. Inclusion criterion was obstetric and gynaecology medical staff working at that hospital. Data were collected regarding views, training experiences and confidence in first-trimester medical and surgical abortion, and second-trimester surgical abortion. Data were analysed according to levels of training, categorised as RANZCOG (Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists) Fellows, prevocational/vocational trainees and general practitioner specialists. Sixty-one valid responses were received from 90 eligible participants (response rate 68%). An overwhelming majority (96%) supported abortion services. The majority of RANZCOG Fellows felt confident performing first-trimester surgical abortion (89%) and first-trimester medical abortion (71%); however, only half felt confident performing second-trimester surgical abortion (50%). Prevocational/vocational trainees were overall less confident but overwhelmingly expressed interest in gaining further experience in abortion. Doctors are generally confident in providing first-trimester abortion services (medical or surgical) in the metropolitan tertiary setting. However, further work is required to understand ongoing barriers to comprehensive abortion care. There may also be a skills shortage for second-trimester surgical abortion, requiring significant improvements in abortion training.

Exploring disaster preparedness in an obstetric unit in a district hospital in the Western Cape Province

BackgroundResearch on disaster preparedness in public hospitals is limited, and specialised units such as obstetric departments need to be even more prepared when rendering health care to vulnerable populations. Disasters can be natural, such as floods due to human interventions, sinkholes due to mining, or pandemic occurrences, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Research on disaster preparedness is limited, and even more so in specialised units such as obstetrics and evacuating a ward of maternal and neonatal patients present unique challenges. Being prepared for any disaster is the only assurance of effective patient healthcare during a disaster. This study explored and described nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding preparedness for a disaster in an obstetric unit in a public institution. The study aimed to make recommendations to improve disaster preparedness in an obstetric ward based on the nurses’ knowledge and attitudes.MethodsThis study utilised an exploratory, descriptive qualitative design within a contextual approach. The data were acquired through individual interviews that were done using a semi-structured interview schedule. An observational walkabout was performed with the unit manager to validate interviewee responses. The study employed purposive sampling with a sample size of 17 nurses (N = 32, n = 17) and a response rate of 53%. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and later, the data underwent analysis using theme analysis and a co-coder.ResultsThe results indicate that the participants demonstrate an awareness of disaster terminology but need more assertiveness in executing the institutional disaster policy. The results illustrate that more frequent training, disaster rehearsals, and simulations should be implemented to improve disaster readiness. Strategies are recommended to enhance preparedness for a disaster in the obstetric unit.ConclusionThe study findings recommend more education and training opportunities that should be regularly instilled as a practice within the obstetric ward. More disaster drills and simulation exercises should be performed to ensure confidence in disaster preparedness. Obstetric staff of all levels should be involved with policymaking and disaster plan development.

Is Resectoscopic Hysteroscopy a Dying Art? Creation of an Educational Instructional Video [ID 2683474

INTRODUCTION: Resectoscopic hysteroscopy is a valuable surgical technique for addressing intrauterine pathology. Within our institution, most operative hysteroscopies are performed using newer non-resectoscopic systems, potentially creating a gap in resident surgical education. We developed a novel instructional video demonstrating the components and capabilities of the resectoscopic hysteroscope. Our aim is to assess whether the instructional video increased surgeon comfort using the resectoscopic hysteroscope. METHODS: A pilot cohort study was performed with gynecologic surgery and obstetrics (GS&O) residents and staff physicians at Brooke Army Medical Center. Participants were provided access to the resectoscope surgical set throughout the study, completed a baseline survey assessing surgeon comfort, and then repeated the survey after watching the instructional video. The survey used a 5-point Likert scale with 1) very uncomfortable, 3) neutral, and 5) very comfortable. RESULTS: Of the 20 participants, 85% lacked formal resectoscope training and 45% had no prior resectoscope experience. Prior experience was limited: 55% used it less than five times and 64% had no use in the last year. At baseline, few were comfortable with setup (15%) and troubleshooting (5%). The instructional video significantly increased surgeon comfort with resectoscope setup (P<.001) and troubleshooting (P<.001). Surgeon comfort supervising a resident doubled after the instructional video (33–66%). All participants felt the video was helpful and would recommend it to others (100%; P<.01). Finally, 80% of participants would like more formal training opportunities for other surgical devices. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated a gap in surgical experience and comfort using the resectoscope at our institution. The novel instructional resectoscope video improved GS&O resident and staff comfort with setting up and troubleshooting the resectoscope. Staff comfort with supervising a resident using the resectoscope also increased. Future directions include expanding study population to include operating room staff and assessing post-intervention resectoscope utilization rates.

Obstetric Staff Support After Traumatic Events

Obstetric Staff Support After Traumatic Events

Experiences of implementing and working with obstetric emergency triage: A qualitative study among Swedish midwifes, auxiliary nurses, and obstetricians

IntroductionObstetric emergency triage is a relatively new form of emergency triage and is not yet implemented in Sweden. Adaptations enables safe assessment of the childbearing woman, fetus and labor status. Failure to identify severely ill childbearing women and women post childbirth has repeatedly led to adverse outcomes. Introducing obstetric emergency triage constitutes a profound alteration in management that may challenge preconceived notions on how to provide best care. This study aimed at exploring and describing obstetric staff’s experiences of working with obstetric emergency triage. Materials and MethodsThirteen obstetricians, midwives and auxiliary nurses at an obstetric emergency department in eastern Sweden were recruited by purposeful sampling. Individual qualitative interviews underwent inductive qualitative content analysis according to Graneheim and Lundman. ResultsAn overarching theme − A new mindset − emerged from the analysis, comprising the four categories: Implications for the individual caregiver’s own work, An improved organization, Improved patient care. Initial skepticism to triage changed towards a positive attitude during implementation, identifying barriers and facilitators for successful implementation. ConclusionsThis first study exploring Swedish obstetric staff’s perception of obstetric emergency triage as a working method suggests that, given time for implementation, a new mindset in obstetric emergency care might develop. Triage provides structure and a sense of control through a clear and quick overview of childbearing women seeking emergency care and enhances teamwork by improving communication. Triage directs attention toward aberrations and promotes reflection and action, improving patient safety.

Psychological Status of Medical Staff in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitals during the Omicron Pandemic Outbreak in China.

Medical staff in China faced great challenges and psychological and physiological changes of varying degrees during the omicron epidemic outbreak. It is important to recognize the potential impact of these challenges on the mental health of medical staff and to provide appropriate resources and support to mitigate their effects. A total of 354 medical staff in two obstetrics and gynecology hospitals of different grades were included in this survey using convenience sampling. The cross-sectional self-report questionnaires survey was conducted using the Basic Characteristics Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). There were 169 (47.7%) participants suffering from anxiety disorder. Working with fever, working in obstetrics, and working with protective clothing were the risk factors for anxiety in medical staff (p < 0.05). One hundred and ninety-six (55.4%) participants were depressed. Working with fever and working in obstetrics were the risk factors for depression in medical staff (p < 0.05). There were 117 (33.1%) participants suffering from insomnia. Working with fever, high educational level, and severe COVID-19 infection status were the risk factors for insomnia in medical staff (p < 0.05). Moreover, medical staff in a provincial hospital were more anxious and depressed than those in a county hospital. At last, there were more participants working with fever in obstetrics (p < 0.05). Anxiety disorder, depression, and insomnia were common among obstetrics and gynecology medical staff during the outbreak of omicron pandemic. During this period, more resources for psychological counselling should be provided to the hospital as well as more reasonable staffing arrangements, and working while having a fever is prohibited, especially in provincial hospital.

A denigration curve to delineate the spread of communication about obstetric staff errors in Italy and its practical application.

Mistrust of doctors and the desire for compensation are driving a rise in malpractice litigation worldwide. To estimate the extent to which Italians view birth complications as malpractice in obstetric care, and how widespread this perception is. WhatsApp® and Facebook® contacts of one of the authors were invited to respond to an online questionnaire. The answers of 265 Italian respondents were used to estimate how common the perception of obstetric staff errors is and how this perception spreads over time: the denigration curve. To test if the denigration curve is reliable, the curve has been plotted along with the trend of the rate of litigation in Italy. Almost a 50% of respondents deemed that birth complications are due to obstetric staff errors. The likelihood of the percep-tion that one has experienced a birth complication was 64.5%. The communication of obstetric staff error seemed low overall among the respondents. The denigration curve shape is almost coincident with the curve of claim rates in Italy, proving that it would be reliable. The respondents provided an estimate of the rate of birth complications that was higher than the real occurrence rate, and attributed these complications to obstetric staff errors. The denigration curve could predict whether and when there might be litigation related to any birth complications (both error related and non-error related).

Risk factors analysis and multidisciplinary team first-aid simulation training for umbilical cord prolapse can improve neonatal outcomes

Objective In the present study, we sought to identify risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) and adapt the multidisciplinary team (MDT) first-aid simulation training for UCP patients. We evaluated the usefulness of the MDT first-aid simulation by comparing delivery outcomes for UCP patients before and after its implementation. Material and methods A retrospective review was conducted on 149 UCP cases (48 overt and 101 occult) and 298 control deliveries that occurred at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 1998 to December 2022. Patient data were compared between the groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for means comparison, and the chi-square test was used for categorical data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors significantly associated with UCP. Results Overt UCP was strongly associated with all adverse delivery outcomes. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified multiparity, breech presentation, polyhydramnios, and low birth weight as independent risk factors for overt UCP (all odds ratios [OR] > 1; all p < 0.05). Preterm labor and abnormal placental cord insertion were identified as independent risk factors for occult UCP (all OR > 1; all p < 0.05). After 2014, when obstetrical staff received MDT first-aid simulation training, patients with overt UCP experienced shorter decision-to-delivery intervals due to more timely cesarean sections. They also had higher Apgar scores at 1, 5, and 10 min, and lower admission rates to the neonatal intensive care unit compared to patients before 2014 (all p < 0.05). Conclusion MDT first-aid simulation training for overt UCP can improve neonatal outcomes. However, medical simulation training efforts should initially focus on the early identification of risk factors for both overt and occult UCP.

Level of nursing care in the gynecological-obstetric area in cases of preeclampsia and eclampsia

Introduction: Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder that occurs during pregnancy and manifests clinically after the first 20 weeks.Objective: to identify the level of nursing care applied by the gynecological-obstetric staff in cases of preeclampsia and eclampsia at the Augusto Egas health center, Santo Domingo - year 2021.Methods: a quantitative approach with a descriptive scope, a non-experimental cross-sectional design was applied. 35 pregnant women and 5 nursing staff professionals participated, who were chosen through non-probabilistic convenience sampling.Results: the surveys revealed that 67 % of the participants are between 19 and 35 years old, while 27 % are under 19 and less than 6 % are over 35. Regarding education, 64 % have secondary education, 23 % primary education, 9 % higher education, and 4 % have no education. Regarding pregnancy, 64 % are between 6 and 9 months, 27 % between 3 and 6 months, and 9 % are 3 months pregnant. In addition, 58 % of pregnant women have no history of preeclampsia; however, 46 % have suffered from anemia and other health problems during pregnancy.Conclusions: Most pregnant women consider nursing care to be good and perceive an adequate assessment of their illness. Gynecological and obstetric staff receive specialized training and comply with protocols in the care and diagnosis of these conditions

Occupational stressors and coping mechanisms among obstetrical nursing staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

BackgroundDue to heightened occupational stress throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital nurses have experienced high rates of depression, anxiety, and burnout. Nurses in obstetrical departments faced unique challenges, such as the management of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy with limited evidence-based protocols and the unknown risks of the virus on pregnancy and fetal development. Despite evidence that obstetrical nurses have experienced high levels of job stress and a decrease in job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is less known about the working conditions resulting in these changes.Using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, this study aims to offer insight into the COVID-19 working environment of obstetrical nurses and shed light on their COVID-19 working experiences.MethodsThe study was conducted using a qualitative approach, with data collection occurring through semi-structured interviews from December 2021 to June 2022. A total of 20 obstetrical nurses recruited from the obstetrical departments of a tertiary hospital located in Ontario, Canada, participated in the study.Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using NVivo. Data was analyzed using a theoretical thematic approach based on the JD-R model.ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) Job stressors, (2) Consequences of working during COVID-19, (3) Personal resources, and (4) Constructive feedback surrounding job resources. The findings show that obstetrical nurses faced several unique job stressors during the COVID-19 pandemic but were often left feeling inadequately supported and undervalued by hospital upper management. However, participants offered several suggestions on how they believe support could have been improved and shared insight on resources they personally used to cope with job stress during the pandemic. A model was created to demonstrate the clear linkage between the four main themes.ConclusionsThis qualitative study can help inform hospital management and public policy on how to better support and meet the needs of nurses working in obstetrical care during pandemics. Moreover, applying the JD-R model offers both a novel and comprehensive look at how the COVID-19 hospital work environment has influenced obstetrical nurses' well-being and performance.

Factors influencing second victim experiences and support needs of OB/GYN and pediatric healthcare professionals after adverse patient events

There is growing recognition that clinical and nonclinical healthcare professionals may become “second victims” following adverse patient events, medical errors, or patient-related injuries. In addition to the trauma-associated symptoms experienced by second victims, unprocessed second victim experience (SVE) can lead to burnout and leaving the healthcare workforce. To better understand the risk factors and support needs of affected healthcare professionals after a SVE, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with twelve staff in obstetrics &amp; gynecology and pediatrics at a large academic medical institution in the upper Midwest of the U.S. Several participants indicated that it was not the patient outcome itself that precipitated the SVE, but associated factors such as moral distress or communication challenges. Participants discussed the role of their work unit culture in post-SVE processing, expressing that units perceived as blame-seeking or where adverse events were not openly discussed, hindered their recovery. While desired support mechanisms were individualized, participants stressed the importance of immediate and proactive support, such as through a peer support program, and long-term support mechanisms for lingering symptoms. As attrition of the healthcare workforce continues to be a significant concern, it is essential that we understand and meet the post-SVE support needs of affected staff, to promote holistic care following adverse patient events.

Multiple Case Study Exploring the Impact of Visitor Restrictions in Hospitals on Childbirth Support during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Childbirth is a life-changing experience for new mothers, birth partners, and families. The COVID-19 pandemic restricted laboring mothers' access to support in hospitals through visitor restrictions. The goal of this research was to describe childbirth support in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study using a multiple case study design describes childbirth support in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspectives of the new mother, birth partner, and obstetric hospital staff, including doulas, nurses, and obstetric providers. The setting was a large metropolitan area in South Texas. Sixteen participants were interviewed including four new mothers, three birth partners, three doulas, three obstetric nurses, and three obstetric providers. Themes that emerged from the data include: under a spotlight, unmet expectations, discovering serenity, and quality childbirth support. During the pandemic, new mothers and birth partners experienced fewer distractions, better communication with the hospital staff, and had better opportunities to bond with the newborn during labor and after birth, but did report missing the presence of their family and friends. Doulas, obstetric nurses, and obstetric providers found they were able to provide better quality and safer care to laboring mothers and birth partners.

The perceptions and attitudes of obstetric staff and midwives towards perinatal mental health disorders screening: a qualitative exploratory study in Shenzhen, China

BackgroundThe perinatal period is a crucial time for women, as they experience various biological, psychological, and social stressors. Due to the complexity of this vulnerable time, there is a high prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among pregnant women. In 2019, the Health Commission of Shenzhen initiated perinatal mental health screening programme in China. However, attitudes and perceptions of medical staff towards implementing mental health screening programme during pregnancy remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and attitudes of obstetric staff and midwives towards screening for perinatal mental disorders in pregnant women, and identify their perceived needs and motivations for undertaking this task.MethodsThis is a qualitative exploratory study. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. The dataset was analysed using inductive content analysis. Purposive sampling method was used to recruit 13 participants at a tertiary maternal hospital in Shenzhen from September to November, 2019.ResultsA total of 13 obstetric staff was interviewed, including two obstetricians, three midwives, and eight nurses. Four themes were identified from this study: views on perinatal mental health disorders screening, competency in identifying and supporting high-risk groups, barriers to dealing with psychological problems during pregnancy, and the support needs of medical staff in undertaking the tasks of mental health disorders screening.ConclusionMedical staff lacked sufficient knowledge and skills in perinatal psychological health and were not well prepared for the task of screening pregnant women for mental health disorders. To address this issue, medical organisations and relevant government sectors should provide training to medical staff on perinatal mental health disorders, enhance public awareness of perinatal mental health disorders, establish a model of multidisciplinary collaboration for the screening of women’s perinatal mental disorders, and provide continuous and holistic care for pregnant women.

Using Mean Anesthesia Workload to Plan Anesthesia Workforce Allocations: The “Flaw of Averages”

(Anesth Analg. 2022;135:1138–1141) Workforce planning within acute care hospital services is especially important, though especially complicated due to inherently unpredictable, unstable, and frequently emergent needs. This editorial comments on the Im et al article “Obstetric Anesthesia Procedure-Based Workload and Facility Utilization of Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Centers of Excellence Designated Institutions,” which studies procedure-based obstetric anesthesia workload and staff utilization using self-reported data collected from the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Centers of Excellence.

Obstetric Anesthesia Procedure-based Workload and Facility Utilization of Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Centers of Excellence Designated Institutions

(Anesth Analg. 2022;135:1142–1150) Determining appropriate and adequate staffing is essential for obstetric anesthesia care to safeguard favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite this, the optimal workload of obstetric anesthesia staff has yet to be determined, possibly because of the unpredictable and ever-changing needs within the obstetric clinical setting. This study aimed to define anesthesia time-based staffing workloads among the 53 Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) Centers of Excellence (COE) and to offer procedure-based workload ratios that other institutions can utilize to help guide obstetric anesthesia staffing decisions.

Evaluation of Dakshata, a scale-up WHO SCC and mentoring-based program, for improving quality of intrapartum care in public sector in Rajasthan, India: repeated mixed-methods surveys

BackgroundThe Dakshata program in India aims to improve resources, providers’ competence, and accountability in labour wards of public sector secondary care hospitals. Dakshata is based on the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist coupled with continuous mentoring. In Rajasthan state, an external technical partner trained, mentored and periodically assessed performance; identified local problems, supported solutions and assisted the state in monitoring implementation. We evaluated effectiveness and factors contributing to success and sustainability.MethodsUsing three repeated mixed-methods surveys over an 18-month period, we assessed 24 hospitals that were at different stages of program implementation at evaluation initiation: Group 1, training had started and Group 2, one round of mentoring was complete. Data on recommended evidence-based practices in labour and postnatal wards and in-facility outcomes were collected by directly observing obstetric assessments and childbirth, extracting information from case sheets and registers, and interviewing postnatal women. A theory-driven qualitative assessment covered key domains of efficiency, effectiveness, institutionalization, accountability, sustainability, and scalability. It included in-depth interviews with administrators, mentors, obstetric staff, and officers/mentors from the external partner.ResultsOverall, average adherence to evidence-based practices improved: Group 1, 55 to 72%; and Group 2, 69 to 79%, (for both p < 0.001) from baseline to endline. Significant improvement was noted in several practices in the two groups during admission, childbirth, and within 1 hour of birth but less in postpartum pre-discharge care. We noted a dip in several evidence-based practices in 2nd assessment, but they improved later. The stillbirth rate was reduced: Group 1: 1.5/1000 to 0.2; and Group 2: 2.5 to 1.1 (p < 0.001). In-depth interviews revealed that mentoring with periodic assessments was highly acceptable, efficient means of capacity building, and ensured continuity in skills upgradation. Nurses felt empowered, however, the involvement of doctors was low. The state health administration was highly committed and involved in program management; hospital administration supported the program. The competence, consistency, and support from the technical partner were highly appreciated by the service providers.ConclusionThe Dakshata program was successful in improving resources and competencies around childbirth. The states with low capacities will require intensive external support for a head start.

Suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in an urban post-partum maternity setting: a retrospective cohort study.

Fifteen percent of women worldwide experience depression in the perinatal period. Suicide is now one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in developed countries. Internationally, many healthcare systems screen post-natal women for depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation to facilitate early assessment and intervention. To our knowledge, no Irish data exists on the prevalence of suicidal ideation in this cohort. To evaluate the prevalence of suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in post-natal women attending a large Dublin maternity hospital. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Women were randomly selected by delivery date over a 6 month period. Demographic and medical information was collected from their booking visit and discharge summary data. EPDS results at discharge post-partum were examined. Data was collected on 643 women. Post-partum, 19 women (3.4%) had experienced suicidal ideation in the previous 7 days. Just over half of these women also had high EPDS scores (>12). Overall, 29 women (5.2%) screened positive for depression (EPDS score > 12). The rate of suicidal ideation is in line with the published international data and emphasises the need for all clinicians to inquire about such thoughts. Training of midwifery and obstetric staff is required. Maternity units should have a policy on the management of suicidal ideation and risk. The prevalence of depressive symptoms post-partum was comparatively low in our study. This could suggest that antenatal screening and early intervention, which are integral parts of the perinatal mental health service, are effective. However, due to limitations of the study, it could also reflect an under-representation of depressive symptom burden in this cohort.

Introduction of the Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package for improved postpartum haemorrhage management: an implementation research study

ObjectivesUse of intrauterine balloon tamponades for refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) management has triggered recent debate since effectiveness studies have yielded conflicting results. Implementation research is needed to identify factors influencing...