Squeeze Bottle Research Articles

Optimized gravity-driven intranasal drop administration delivers significant doses to the ostiomeatal complex and maxillary sinus.

Chronic and allergic rhinosinusitis impacts approximately 12% of the global population. Challenges in rhinosinusitis treatment include paranasal sinus inaccessibility and variability in delivery efficiency among individuals. This study addresses these challenges of drug delivery by developing a high-efficiency, low-variability protocol for nasal drop delivery to the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) and maxillary sinus. Patient-specific nasal casts were dissected to reveal the configurations of conchae and meatus, providing insights into anatomical features amendable for sinus delivery. Fluorescent dye-enhanced videos visualized the dynamic liquid translocation in transparent nasal casts, allowing real-time assessment and quick adjustment to delivery parameters. Dosimetry to the OMC and maxillary sinus were quantified as drop count and mass using a precision scale. Key delivery factors, including the device type, formulation, and head-chin orientation, were systematically investigated in a cohort of ten nasal casts. Results show that both the squeeze bottle and soft-mist nasal pump yielded notably low doses to the OMC with high variability, and no dose from these two devices was detected within the maxillary sinuses. In contrast, the proposed approach, which included a curved nozzle surpassing the nasal valve and leveraged gravity-driven liquid translocation along the lateral nasal wall, delivered significant doses to the OMC and maxillary sinus. Iterative experimentations identified the optimal head tilt to be 40° and chin tilt to be° from the lateral recumbent position. Statistical analyses established the drop count required for effective OMC/sinus delivery. The proposed delivery protocol holds the potential to enhance chronic rhinosinusitis treatment outcomes with low variability. The dual role of nasal anatomy in posing challenges and offering opportunities highlights the need for future investigations using diverse formulations in a larger cohort of nasal models.

Sinonasal Irrigation After Endoscopic Sinus surgery - Past to Present and Future.

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the gold standard treatment for medically refractive chronic rhinosinusitis, aimed at removing diseased tissue and improving natural sinus drainage and aeration. Irrigation of the sinuses has been known to improve sinus mucosal health and is an essential adjunct to surgery. There are a number of methods, devices, and solutions available which are used for nasal irrigation. Neti Pot, squeeze bottle, syringe, rubber bulb and commercially available nasal sprays are some of the simpler used devices used for douching. Electric devices like flosser, Hydropulse and the Navage nasal irrigation systems are available but it's not clear if they provide any advantage over the other methods. We use and propose a gravitational pressure-pulsed device which provides adequate volume and force without the need for external pressure. Salt with sodium bicarbonate is the most used solution base. Hypertonic saline has been described to be more efficacious compared to isotonic saline. Additives such as sodium hypochlorite, antibiotics, corticosteroids, manuka honey and xylitol have proven to be beneficial. Large volume positive pressure irrigations have proven to be beneficial. Optimal position for irrigation varies for low or high-volume irrigation systems. Patient education regarding precautions and disinfection of the device is a must.

3D Printing as a Planning Tool to Optimize Sinonasal Irrigation.

Topical sinus irrigation plays a critical role in the management of sinonasal diseases. Yet, the penetration of irrigant to targeted sinuses may be highly variable and difficult to predict. Here, we investigate the use of 3D printing as a planning tool to optimize outcomes. Eight post-operative models were 3D printed with a FormLabs Form3 printer based on individual CT scans. Irrigations were performed and video recorded with a squeeze bottle attached via silicon water-tight seal, in 4 head positions: 45° to-the-side, 90° to-the-side, 45° forward and 45° to-the-side, and 90° forward, with irrigation fluid entering the upper (conventional) or lower (backfill) nostrils. Significant individual variations were observed in sinus penetration as a function of head position. In general, the maxillary sinus was the easiest to irrigate in most head positions (P < .05), followed by frontal and ethmoid, with sphenoid being the most difficult. Both the 90°-to-the-side and the 90°-forward positions were significantly more effective than the others (P < .05), with 90°-forward better for frontal sinuses and 90°-to-the-side superior for all other sinuses. The backfill was significantly superior to conventional technique in head positions involving a side tilt (P < .05). Variations in technique and position significantly impacted irrigation outcome. Backfill irrigation that pushes fluid against gravity to pool around the ostium, seems to provide overall better outcomes. This study demonstrates the advantage of 3D printing as a rapid planning tool to guide irrigation strategies.

Computational investigation of nasal surface coverage from squeeze bottle and Neti Pot saline irrigation flow

Background and objective: Nasal saline irrigation is a common therapy for inflammatory nasal and paranasal disease or for managing post nasal and sinus surgery recovery. Two common irrigation devices include the netipot and squeeze bottles, where anecdotally, these devices alleviate congestion, facial pain, and pressure. However, a quantitative evaluation of these devices’ performance and the fluid dynamics responsible for the irrigation distribution through the nose is lacking. This study tracked the liquid surface coverage and wall shear stresses during nasal saline irrigation produced from a Neti Pot and squeeze bottle.Methods: This study used transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to investigate the saline irrigation flow field in a subject-specific sinonasal model. The computational nasal cavity model was constructed from a high-resolution computed tomography scan (CT). The irrigation procedure applied a head position tilted at 90° forward using an 80 ml squeeze bottle and 120 ml Neti Pot.Results: The results from a single sinonasal model demonstrated that the Neti Pot irrigation was more effective in delivering saline solution to the nasal cavity on the contralateral side of irrigation due to typically larger volumes but at the expense of reduced flow and shearing rates, as the flow entered under gravitational forces. The squeeze bottle irrigation provided greater surface coverage on the side of irrigation.Conclusions: The results from the single patient model, demonstrated the Neti Pot increased surface coverage in the paranasal sinuses. Reducing the jet diameter may aid the direct targeting of a specific region at the side of irrigation by preventing the impingement of the jet to the nasal passage surface and redirection of the flow. Evaluating this performance across a wider cohort of patients can strengthen the findings.

Nasal Irrigation Delivery in Three Post-FESS Models From a Squeeze-bottle Using CFD

PurposeNasal saline irrigation is highly recommended in patients following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) to aid the postoperative recovery. Post-FESS patients have significantly altered anatomy leading to markedly different flow dynamics from those found in pre-op or non-diseased airways, resulting in unknown flow dynamics.MethodsThis work investigated how the liquid stream disperses through altered nasal cavities following surgery using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). A realistic squeeze profile was determined from physical experiments with a 27-year-old male using a squeeze bottle with load sensors. The administration technique involved a head tilt of 45-degrees forward to represent a head position over a sink. After the irrigation event that lasted 4.5 s, the simulation continued for an additional 1.5 s, with the head orientation returning to an upright position.ResultsThe results demonstrated that a large maxillary sinus ostium on the right side allows saline penetration into this sinus. The increased volume of saline entering the maxillary sinus limits the saline volume available to the rest of the sinonasal cavity and reduces the surface coverage of the other paranasal sinuses. The average wall shear stress was higher on the right side than on the other side for two patients. The results also revealed that head position alters the sinuses’ saline residual, especially the frontal sinuses.ConclusionWhile greater access to sinuses is achieved through FESS surgery, patients without a nasal septum limits posterior sinus penetration due to the liquid crossing over to the contralateral cavity and exiting the nasal cavity early.

On Loving Clothes, and Preferring Not To

On Loving Clothes, and Preferring Not To

Computational Investigation of Nasal Surface Coverage from Squeeze Bottle and Neti Pot Saline Irrigation Flow

Computational Investigation of Nasal Surface Coverage from Squeeze Bottle and Neti Pot Saline Irrigation Flow

Effects of large volume, isotonic nasal saline irrigation for acute rhinosinusitis: a randomized controlled study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of nasal saline irrigation (large volume, positive pressure isotonic saline) in addition to standard treatment in patients with acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). This parallel, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital. The adult patients with ARS (age ≥18 years) were randomly assigned to two groups. The irrigation group received 0.9% saline irrigation twice daily, using a 250-ml squeeze bottle, in addition to standard treatment. The no-irrigation group received standard treatment only. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1week, and 2weeks. The quality of life, rhinologic subscore, symptom score, endoscopy score, and cure rate were compared. Sixty-one patients (30: irrigation, 31: no-irrigation) were enrolled. There were 17 males and 44 females. The mean age was 41.06 years. Although both groups showed improvements, the improvement of each outcome was not different between the groups. Subgroup analysis by ARS subtype showed benefits of irrigation in the common cold subgroup; the improvements that were greater than control included: rhinologic subscore, intergroup mean difference -4.15 [95% confidence interval (CI), -7.49, -0.80] at 1week and -5.23 [95% CI, -9.69, -0.78] at 2weeks; combined symptom score -5.35 [95% CI, -10.55, -0.14] at 1week and -8.02 [95%CI, -14.36, -1.70] at 2weeks. The add-on isotonic nasal saline irrigation using a large volume, positive pressure device did not add benefits equally for all ARS patients. The benefits of irrigation on quality of life and nasal symptoms were only observed in the common cold patient subgroup.

Effects of head tilt on squeeze-bottle nasal irrigation – A computational fluid dynamics study

Nasal irrigation is a widely recognized treatment for several sinonasal diseases. However, there is a lack of clear evidence-based guidelines for optimal irrigation delivery to improve lavage and topical drug delivery. This study uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to assess the effects of different head tilt positions on sinonasal coverage, residence time and shear stresses in squeeze-bottle nasal irrigation. A sinonasal cavity computational model was constructed from a high-resolution CT scan of a healthy, 25-year-old Asian female. The Volume of Fluid method was used to track the interface between the two immiscible fluids (air and water). The direction of gravity was varied to simulate different head tilt-positions (0° Straight, 45° Forward, 45° Left, 45° Right and 45° Backward) during nasal irrigation with 150 mL liquid via a squeeze bottle through the left nostril for 2 s with a 0.1 s acceleration/deceleration time. The results showed that the 45° backward head tilt position was the most effective in delivering irrigation to the ethmoid, frontal and sphenoid sinuses. Altering head tilt had minimal impact on irrigation delivery to the maxillary sinuses. Maximum wall shear stresses seen in localized areas of the sinus mucosa varied significantly with different head tilt angles. However, the difference in mean wall shear stress on the sinus surfaces was marginal with changing head tilt position. The findings suggest that an optimized head tilt position can be identified to improve liquid irrigation to targeted sinuses, as per treatment requirements (lavage and topical drug delivery).

Development of a New Device for Postoperative Self-Irrigation of the Maxillary and Frontal Sinus.

Nasal saline irrigation is the corner stone of postoperative care after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, intrasinus penetration of the saline solution can be challenging and may require difficult head position, particularly for the frontal sinus. Our aim was to evaluate a novel device for direct intrasinus self-irrigation, usable at home for both maxillary and frontal sinus. Thirty devices were implemented in 23 patients: in the maxillary sinus for 18 patients and in the frontal sinus for 5 patients. The device was removed after 7 days on average (5-10 days), and nasal saline irrigation was carried on with a squeeze bottle for 6 weeks. Retrospective evaluation of the device included: device-related complication, patient satisfaction, and ostial or middle turbinate synechiae at 3 months. No device-related complication (obstruction, displacement, infection, bleeding) occurred. Twenty-one (91.3%) patients were satisfied with the device. Two patients required the help of a nurse for irrigation. No ostial of middle turbinate synechiae was visualized at 3 months. This new endonasal device enables direct intrasinus self-irrigation after FESS for CRS. This preliminary study showed that this device is safe and easy to use. However, further investigations are required to assess its potential role to reduce the risk of synechiae and revision surgery.

Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) Simulation of Flow through a Squeeze Bottle

In the present study, a Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) simulation has been performed on a squeeze bottle. In a squeeze bottle operation, pressure is exerted on the container with the user's hand, due to which fluid within the container is compressed and thereby expelled through a nozzle. Volume change due to wall deformation result in pressure rise in the fluid volume influencing the flow characteristics of the liquid being dispensed. The simulation presented here is an attempt made to capture wall deformation vs liquid outflow rate and outlet flow trajectory.

Can computational fluid dynamic models help us in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

The aim of this study was to review the recent literature (January 2017-July 2020) on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies relating to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), including airflow within the pre and postoperative sinonasal cavity, virtual surgery, topical drug and saline delivery (sprays, nebulizers and rinses) and olfaction. Novel CFD-specific parameters (heat flux and wall shear stress) are highly correlated with patient perception of nasal patency. Increased ostial size markedly improves sinus ventilation and drug delivery. New virtual surgery tools allow surgeons to optimize interventions. Sinus deposition of nasal sprays is more effective with smaller, low-inertia particles, outside of the range produced by many commercially available products. Saline irrigation effectiveness is improved using greater volume, with liquid entering sinuses via 'flooding' of ostia rather than direct jet entry. CFD has provided new insights into sinonasal airflow, air-conditioning function, the nasal cycle, novel measures of nasal patency and the impact of polyps and sinus surgery on olfaction. The deposition efficiency of topical medications on sinus mucosa can be markedly improved through parametric CFD experiments by optimising nasal spray particle size and velocity, nozzle angle and insertion location, while saline irrigation effectiveness can be optimized by modelling squeeze bottle volume and head position. More sophisticated CFD models (inhalation and exhalation, spray particle and saline irrigation) will increasingly provide translational benefits in the clinical management of CRS.

Successful Treatment of Refractory Ulcerative Proctitis in a Pediatric Patient Using Topical Tacrolimus

Successful Treatment of Refractory Ulcerative Proctitis in a Pediatric Patient Using Topical Tacrolimus

Using 3D printed sinonasal models to visualize and optimize personalized sinonasal sinus irrigation strategies.

Topical sinus irrigations (neti-pot, squeeze bottles) play a critical role in the management of sinonasal disease. However, due to intricate nasal anatomy, penetration of topical irrigations to targeted sinus regions may be highly variable, and difficult to objectively predict. Variables, including head positions, injection angles, flow rates, etc. may vary significantly depending on the individual's anatomy. The purpose of this study was to propose a novel idea: using a 3D printed model of sinonasal cavities to visualize and develop a patient-specific irrigation strategy. As a proof of concept, 3D replicas of one patient's sinonasal cavities pre- and post-surgery were printed with a Form2 SLA 3D printer based on their CT scans. The setup included rubber/silicon seals attached to the model's nostrils to create a watertight seal with the irrigation device and food color dye added for better visualization of irrigation results. Irrigations were performed on the 3D models with various head positions, injection angles, and flow rates, and were successful to determine the optimal strategy to targeted sinuses. Significant differences were observed between different targeted sinuses and between pre and post-surgery models. With more affordable 3D printing, this technology may potentially improve patient care and patient education, allowing clinicians and patients to develop a personalized irrigation strategy and have visual confirmation.

Characterization of nasal irrigation flow from a squeeze bottle using computational fluid dynamics.

Nasal saline irrigation has become standard of care in various sinonasal conditions, including allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and in the postoperative patient. Evidence regarding the mechanisms and dynamics of liquid flow through the sinonasal cavity remains limited due to inadequate experimental models (cadaveric, 3-dimensional [3D] printed, imaging of labeled dyes and radioisotopes). We aimed to develop a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of nasal irrigation to demonstrate sinonasal surface coverage, residence times across the mucosal surfaces, and shearing force of irrigation. A nasal cavity geometry derived from high-resolution paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scans of a healthy, unoperated, 25-year-old patient was created. CFD analysis was performed to assess the distribution of nasal irrigation from a tapered nozzle bottle at a forward head-tilt position of 45 degrees with a 2-second burst at 35 mL/second. The model demonstrates nasal irrigation from ipsilateral to contralateral with precise measures of velocity, pressure, wall shear stress, and mapping of surface coverage and residence times at specific locations and times. The nasal cavity experiences almost complete coverage of irrigation, while overflow from the nasal cavity facilitates moderate coverage of the ipsilateral maxillary (40%) and anterior ethmoid sinuses (30%). Negligible coverage of the sphenoid and frontal sinuses was noted. Detailed physical mechanisms of liquid irrigation injected from a commonly used squeeze bottle were shown. Ipsilateral maxillary and ethmoid sinus penetration are primarily due to overflow rather than direct jet entry, confirming the recommendation of larger volumes of irrigation to "flood" the sinus ostia.

The Role of Dispensing Device and Label Warnings on Dosing for Sunscreen Application: A Randomized Trial.

Drug manufacturers are expected to provide labeling information needed to yield safe and effective product use. However, it is not clear that consumers dose sunscreen, an over-the-counter drug, appropriately; in fact, existing evidence suggests underdosing as a common phenomenon. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dispensing device and labeling on self-administered doses of sunscreen in young adults. To investigate those effects, a 2 × 2 factorial laboratory experiment crossing dispensing device (two levels) with labeling treatment (two levels) was conducted. Participants applied sunscreen from each of the four treatments; dosing concentration, measured in mg/cm2, served as the response variable. Participants (n = 94) were recruited on the campuses of Michigan State University (East Lansing, MI) and California Polytechnic State University (San Luis Obispo, CA). Each participant applied sunscreen from each unique treatment to sites on their arms and legs (four applications). Postapplication, a survey was completed to characterize demographics, risk perception, and sunscreen use patterns. Results indicate participants applied approximately 30% less sunscreen from the pump bottles than the squeeze bottles (difference estimate of 0.3059 mg/cm2, standard error = 0.0607, p < .0001); there was no evidence of a difference based on label treatments. Post hoc recognition tests indicated only 55% of participants were able to recognize the two experimental labels they had viewed immediately following sunscreen application. Sunscreen application density was directly related to level of worry regarding skin cancer and frequency of sunscreen use (α = .05). Our results suggest the dispensing device used to deliver sunscreen impacts the dosage amount consumers apply.

Extent of maxillary sinus surgery and its effect on instrument access, irrigation penetration, and disease clearance.

Middle meatal antrostomy (MMA) provides limited access to the anteromedial and inferior aspect of the maxillary sinus (MS) often resulting in residual disease and inflammatory burden. Newer extended procedures, such as mega-antrostomy (Mega-A) and extended modified mega-antrostomy (EMMA), have been developed to address this limitation. This study assesses the effect of varying extent of MS surgery on irrigation penetration and access of instrumentation. The MS of 5 fresh-frozen cadavers were sequentially dissected. Irrigation was evaluated with a squeeze bottle (SB) in different head positions and using different volumes of fluid. Surgical reach and visualization were examined using common sinus instruments and different angled endoscopes. A disease simulation was also performed to check for residual debris after instrumentation and irrigations. Irrigation penetration improved as antrostomy size increased (p < 0.0001), with a significant difference observed between the extended procedures and MMA. The effect of the volume was significant for SB (p < 0.0001) but head positions appeared irrelevant (p = 0.613). Overall visualization improved for Mega-A and EMMA. A similar trend was seen for the reach of the instruments to all sinus wall subsites. EMMA facilitated the most removal of "sinus disease" in the disease simulation model when compared with both MMA and Mega-A, due to its reach of the anteroinferior aspects of the maxillary sinus. High-volume irrigation using SB achieved good sinus penetration, irrespective of head position. Extended MS procedures appear to further increase irrigation penetration as well as surgical access.

Effects of sphenoid surgery on nasal irrigation delivery.

Nasal irrigation is an important component of medical management in chronic rhinosinusitis. Nasal irrigations facilitate topical medication of therapies and lavage of mucin. In this study we aim to compare the influence of increasing surgical sphenoid openings on the distribution, force, and clearance of nasal irrigations. A study was performed on fresh-frozen adult cadaver heads. The surgical ostium was modified on one side via a simple sphenoidotomy, a sphenoid sinusectomy (type 1), and sphenoid sinusectomy (type 3a). The nasal cavity was irrigated using a 240-mL squeeze bottle with 0.1% fluoroscein. An endoscope passed through the contralateral side through the sphenoid septum recorded the irrigation. Videos were recorded and blindly assessed. The distribution was defined as either no irrigation, less than one third of the sinus, less than or equal to two thirds of the sinus, or the complete sinus. The force was defined as minimal, minor, or major. The clearance was defined as no residual, less than one third of volume, less than or equal to two thirds of volume, and more than two thirds volume. Ordinal correlation scores were assessed using the Kendall tau-B test. Nine specimens (sphenoid sinuses) were assessed (44.4% female; age, 75.0 ± 12.7 years). The use of a sphenoid sinusectomy or larger produced better distribution (percent specimens with more than one third: 100% vs 59%, p < 0.01), more force (percent major: 83% vs 29%, p < 0.01), and better clearance (percent with one third or less remaining: 56% vs 18%, p < 0.01). Increasing sphenoid ostial size improves nasal irrigation penetration. We propose that greater sphenoid sinusectomy size allows for improved lavage and irrigation penetration. Complete removal of the anterior face appears to mitigate pooling of irrigation.

Identification of microbial contaminants in sinus rinse squeeze bottles used by allergic rhinitis patients.

ObjectiveTo identify whether irrigation devices become contaminated when used by patients with allergic rhinitis (AR).MethodsTen AR patients with no clinical or endoscopic evidence of active sinonasal infection were given a sinus rinse system and instructed on its proper use, cleaning, and storage. Two squeeze bottles (bottle A and bottle B) were given to each patient for twice-a-day rinsing. Bottle A was used in the morning and analyzed after four weeks. Bottle B was used in the evening and analyzed after 8 weeks of use. Microbial contaminants were cultured from the nose pieces and the inner surface of the bottles obtained from patients.ResultsSeventeen sinus rinse devices (17/20) from all individuals in this study grew bacteria commonly in the nozzles. Twenty-four bacterial isolates consisting of 14 different species were cultured and identified with most common organisms being bacilli and staphylococcus. In addition, no correlation was apparent between the length of bottle use and the degree of contamination (r = 0.13, p = 0.76). During the study period, no patient developed acute sinus infections.ConclusionMicrobial contamination of the sinus rinse system occurs commonly, even in uninfected AR patients; however no evidence exists linking this to clinically relevant sinus infections.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01030146.

Head and Bottle Angles Achieved by Patients During High-Volume Sinonasal Irrigations.

Certain head positions can optimize topical irrigation distribution to specific sinuses. No studies have assessed whether patients attain these positions when irrigating. The purpose of this study was to assess head and bottle angles achieved when patients irrigate based on instructions from an irrigation device or from a Rhinologist. Study approval was obtained from Henry Ford Health System's Institutional Review Board (10604). Forty-two patients with various rhinologic conditions were equally divided into groups based on irrigation instruction type: pictoral instructions from an irrigation device or written/verbal instructions from a Rhinologist. Both groups' instructions directed nose-to-floor head positioning. Simulating home irrigations, patients irrigated 120 mL of saline into each naris using 240 mL squeeze bottles. Frontal and lateral views were captured using video cameras. On frontal view, angles were measured between (1) nasal dorsum (ND) and bottle tip (BT; n = 84) and (2) ND and vertical (V; n = 84). On lateral view, angles were measured between (1) line from nasion-to-pogonion (NTP) and horizontal (H) (n = 73) and (2) NTP and BT (n = 73). On lateral view, average angle between NTP and H was 20.0° (standard deviation [SD] = 13.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.0-23.0) and between NTP and BT was 59.4° (SD = 15.8, 95% CI = 55.8-63.1). On frontal view, average angle between ND and V was 9.5° (SD = 19.5, 95% CI = 5.3-13.6) and between ND and BT was 24.5° (SD = 12.0, 95% CI = 21.9-27.0). There were no significant angle differences between sides or instruction types. When instructed to irrigate in the nose-to-floor head position, patients achieved a head position uprotated 20° on lateral view and vertex rotated 10° away from the side of irrigation on frontal view.