Sports Concussion Research Articles

Determinants of symptom presentation and resolution following concussions in high school sports

ABSTRACT Sport-related concussions (SRCs) are prevalent in high school (HS) sports, though the determinants of, and relationships between concussion symptoms in this population remain relatively unknown. We analysed SRC data captured within the HS RIO injury surveillance system during 2014/15-2018/19. We used Generalized Estimating Equations to simultaneously assess covariate predictors of symptom presentations and identify pairwise symptom associations and employed multivariable ordinal logistic regressions to determine symptom resolution time (SRT) predictors. Among the 8,969 concussions assessed, headaches (94.3%) and dizziness (73.3%) were the most prevalently reported symptoms. In 5,953 boys’ concussion assessed, class year, event type and injury mechanism emerged as determinants of various concussion symptoms, while in 3,016 girls’ concussions assessed, class year, event type, injury mechanism, and sport type emerged as significant symptom determinants. In both groups, difficulty concentrating, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to noise, and disorientation were symptoms with the strongest associations with other symptoms. Odds of longer SRT were higher with greater endorsement (i.e. counts) of the subset of symptoms with strongest cross-domain associations (ORadj. = 1.35; 95% CI = [1.30, 1.40]). Our findings provide valuable information for informing sideline and follow-up clinical concussion assessment algorithms in high school athletes.

Concussion Assessment and Management Self-efficacy Among Irish Clinicians.

This study explored concussion assessment and management self-efficacy and practices of allied healthcare professionals in Ireland. (1) Self-efficacy levels and practices vary across different concussion assessment and management skills, (2) the ability to practice skills impacts self-efficacy most. Cross-sectional. Level 3. Survey of allied healthcare professionals (285 responders), investigating (1) demographics, (2) concussion assessment (immediate and office) and management (postconcussion advice and management/rehabilitation) self-efficacy levels and practices, and (3) factors affecting self-efficacy. Levels of self-efficacy among clinicians were 64.5 ± 26.6 (immediate assessment) and 56.6 ± 25.4 (postconcussion advice) (highest scores: concussion symptom checklist [80 ± 28.4], physical rest advice [80.1 ± 27.8]; lowest: Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool [44.6 ± 41.2] and nutrition advice [34.1 ± 33.7]). Overall levels of self-efficacy among Certified Athletic Therapists and Chartered Physiotherapists were 51.5 ± 20.1 (assessment) and 62.1 ± 20.9 (management) (highest scores: history/clinical evaluation nonspecific to concussion [86.6 ± 16.2], physical rest advice [86.3 ± 20]; lowest: paper/pencil neuropsychological test [16.7 ± 28.6], advice on medication use [39.2 ± 35]). A strong positive correlation was observed between clinician self-efficacy and frequency of use of overall (r = 0.795; P < 0.01) and immediate (r = 0.728; P < 0.01) assessment, advice (r = 0.805; P < 0.01), and management (r = 0.812; P < 0.01) skills. Factors with greatest positive impact on clinician self-efficacy were the ability to practice skills during clinical placement (3.3 ± 0.9) and remaining emotionally (3.3 ± 0.8) and physically (3.3 ± 0.8) calm while practicing. Clinicians in Ireland had moderate self-efficacy in concussion care. Those who used concussion-relevant skills frequently in practice displayed higher self-efficacy for those skills. Concussion-related self-efficacy can be enhanced through practice in a clinical environment and through experiencing composure while practicing.

Initial Symptom Severity and Recovery of Sport-Related Concussion in Team Versus Individual Sport Athletes.

Recovery after sport-related concussion is variable, and potential differences between team vs individual sport athletes are not fully understood. In a cohort of athletes with concussions, we sought to compare these groups across (1) symptom severity score, (2) individual symptom cluster scores, and (3) recovery metrics. A retrospective, cohort study of 13 to 23-year-old athletes treated at a regional sport concussion center between November 2017 and April 2022 was conducted. Athletes were categorized into team vs individual sport athletes, with additional classification of individual sports based on strong vs minimal team elements (ie, the degree of interdependence displayed by athletes). The primary outcomes were symptom severity score, measured by either the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition or the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing, and physical, cognitive, emotional, and sleep symptom cluster scores. Secondary outcomes were recovery metrics, including time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play. Of the 1051 athletes, 954 (90.8%) were in team sports and 97 (9.2%) in individual sports. In multivariable linear regression, individual sport athletes had higher emotional symptom severity compared with team sport athletes (β = 0.09 [0.01, 0.17], P = .034) when adjusting for sex, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, psychological disorders, time to clinic, on-field evaluation, and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing vs Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition scale. There were no significant differences in return-to-learn (P = .104), symptom resolution (P = .941), or return-to-play (P = .279) on univariate regressions. In the current single-center, pilot study of athletes with a sport-related concussion, individual sport athletes exhibited more emotional symptoms than team sport athletes. These preliminary data lend early support that individual sport athletes may be more at risk of emotional symptoms than team sport athletes after a sport-related concussion. Clinicians may use these findings to identify athletes who may be particularly vulnerable to emotional symptoms.

Media Coverage of Sports Concussion: An Experimental Study of Framing Effects on Community Injury Perceptions

The media portrayal of sports concussion (SC) contributes to community understanding of injury. However, this could be hampered by inaccurately framed (minimising) SC coverage. 157 volunteers were randomly allocated to one of six online survey conditions. The conditions used a brief written news sports report with a non-serious (MI) or serious (MA) SC frame. Additional conditions varied the injured player’s sex (male or female) or the sport (unnamed or basketball). Standardised measures were administered, including the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised, and a custom-measure of perceptions of SC seriousness (SISI). A series of one-way ANOVA’s revealed one statistically significant framing effect for the SISI ( p &lt; .05, large effect). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons found higher SISI scores for MA compared to MI conditions. There was no difference in the player sex or sport variants. No differences were found on other outcome measures. This study replicated a MA versus MI framing effect on the SISI, however wider effects were not seen. The framing effect on community perceptions of SC may be more circumscribed than previously suggested. While this requires further investigation, minimising frames should still be avoided as per existing recommendations.

Fluid biomarkers of chronic traumatic brain injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of long-term disability across the world. Evidence for the usefulness of imaging and fluid biomarkers to predict outcomes and screen for the need to monitor complications in the acute stage is steadily increasing. Still, many people experience symptoms such as fatigue and cognitive and motor dysfunction in the chronic phase of TBI, where objective assessments for brain injury are lacking. Consensus criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, a clinical syndrome possibly associated with the neurodegenerative disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy, which iscommonly associated with sports concussion, have been defined only recently. However, these criteria do not fit all individuals living with chronic consequences of TBI. The pathophysiology of chronic TBI shares many similarities with other neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory conditions, such as Alzheimer disease. As with Alzheimer disease, advancements in fluid biomarkers represent one of the most promising paths for unravelling the chain of pathophysiological events to enable discrimination between these conditions and, with time, provide prediction modelling and therapeutic end points. This Review summarizes fluid biomarker findings in the chronic phase of TBI (≥6 months after injury) that demonstrate the involvement of inflammation, glial biology and neurodegeneration in the long-term complications of TBI. We explore how the biomarkers associate with outcome and imaging findings and aim to establish mechanistic differences in biomarker patterns between types of chronic TBI and other neurodegenerative conditions. Finally, current limitations and areas of priority for future fluid biomarker research are highlighted.

Mass media guidelines for sports concussion: a scoping review protocol

Sports concussion is a common and costly injury, and increased public injury awareness could help reduce costs. Many factors, including public messages about sports concussion by the sports media, shape...

Studying Contact Replays: Investigating Mechanisms, Management and Game Exposures (SCRIMMAGE) for brain health in the Australasian National Rugby League: a protocol for a database design

Concussions in contact sports are challenging for athletes, health professionals and sporting bodies to prevent, detect and manage. Design of interventions for primary prevention, early recognition of concussion and continuing...

Does Mechanism of Injury Affect Recovery After Sport-Related Concussion in Basketball? A Pilot Study.

Understanding sport-related concussion (SRC) mechanisms can aid in prevention and treatment. Concussions in basketball have received relatively less attention compared with collision sports. In a cohort of concussed high school basketball players, this pilot study sought to (1) describe the mechanisms of how concussions occur in basketball and (2) assess the relationship between mechanisms and acute symptomatology and recovery time. A retrospective cohort, pilot study examined concussed adolescent athletes (aged 14-18 years) treated at a sports concussion center from 11/2017 to 04/2022. The primary independent variable was mechanism of injury, categorized into (1) contact (head-to-head, head-to-body, head-to-ball, head-to-ground), (2) player (offensive play, defensive play, both), and (3) awareness mechanisms (aware, unaware). The outcomes included acute symptom severity, time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play. Associations between mechanisms and outcomes were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, independent t-tests, multivariable linear regressions, and Cox regression. Of 105 basketball players (16.2 ± 1.4 years; 50.5% male), head-to-ground contact (n = 44/105; 41.9%) was most common. Taking-a-charge (n = 12/53; 22.6%) was the most frequent player mechanism, with similar rates for offensive (n = 24/53; 45.3%) and defensive (n = 23/53; 43.4%) plays. Most were aware of impending collision (n = 37/46; 80.4%). Head-to-body concussions were associated with higher initial symptoms severity scores when compared with head-to-head (β = 0.33, P = .003) and head-to-ground (β = 0.23, P = .050) contacts. Player and awareness mechanisms were not significant predictors of outcome measures. Only higher initial symptom scores were associated with a longer time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play. In this pilot study of concussed high school basketball players, head-to-ground was the most common concussion mechanism, with similar rates during offensive and defensive plays. Although head-to-body contact increased acute symptoms, other mechanisms did not predict recovery time. Given the limited information on concussions in basketball, the preliminary results of this pilot study may help inform larger studies on basketball SRC mechanisms.

B - 23 Surveying Public Perceptions about the Coverage of Sports Concussion in the Media

Abstract Objective Public awareness of sports concussion is key for injury management. This awareness is shaped by media reporting and has been critiqued for different reasons by health professionals and sport stakeholders. The community’s view about this reporting is unknown. Methods 157 community volunteers completed an online survey, including a purpose-built multi-item measure of perceptions of sports concussion media portrayal (PoSCoMP). The PoSCoMP score was compared for groups based on concussion history, concussion education, concussion knowledge, playing a concussion-risk sport, or regular sports media consumption. Item consensus (endorsement by &amp;gt;50% of the sample) and free-text responses were descriptively analysed. Results The PoSCoMP had acceptable internal consistency (α &amp;gt; 0.79). One statistically significant group difference was found (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Compared to people with no concussion history, people with a concussion history had a more negative perception of the media coverage (Cohen’s d = 0.53 [medium effect]). There were nine commonly agreed perceptions (e.g., important for player safety), and four commonly disagreed perceptions (e.g., ignored in some sports). The free-text responses urged change in the media coverage of sports concussion, with some perceiving this as already underway. Conclusion Community members’ views about the media portrayal of sports concussion are largely unaffected by individual differences and share commonalities with the views of sport stakeholders and health professionals. Future efforts to improve public awareness of concussion through media reporting should consider the public’s position on this coverage. This could lead to changes that have the public’s support and are more effective in increasing public injury awareness.

Arachnoid Cysts in Athletes with Sports-Related Concussion: A Case Series and Literature Review

BackgroundArachnoid cysts (AC) are associated with a risk of rupture or haemorrhage following head impact and pose a potential predisposing factor for significant complications of sport-related concussion. Despite a recognised association between ACs and intracranial haemorrhage/cyst rupture, the risk profile of participating in contact sports with AC is not well defined. We report a retrospective case series of players presenting to the Birmingham Sports Concussion Clinic between 2017 and 2023 and underwent MRI head, with a comprehensive review of the prior literature.Results432 athletes underwent MRI of which 11 were identified to have AC (middle fossa n = 8; posterior fossa n = 2, intraventricular n = 1). Average maximal diameter was 4.1 ± 1.2 cm. 64% had a protracted recovery (≥ 3 months). 9% experienced an AC specific complication (cyst rupture, complete neurological recovery, maximal diameter 6.5 cm, Galassi II, 4 previous concussions). 91% of patients (mean maximal diameter 3.9 ± 1.0 cm) experienced no complications despite multiple previous accumulated sports-related concussions (mean 3.3, range 1–9). Case studies from the literature are summarised (n = 63), with 98% reporting complications, none of which resulted in adverse or unfavourable neurological outcomes. Across prospective and retrospective cohort studies, 1.5% had a structural injury, and (where outcome was reported) all had a favourable outcome.ConclusionsAC is an incidental finding in athletes, with the majority in our cohort having sustained serial concussions without AC complication. The single complication within this cohort occurred in the largest AC, and AC size is proposed as a tentative factor associated with increased risk of contact sports participation. Complications of AC appear to be a rare occurrence. This case series and review has not identified evidence to suggest that participation in sports with AC is of significant risk, though individualised assessment and discussion of the potential risks of contact sports participation should be offered.

Posttraumatic stress symptoms in recovery from concussion

ABSTRACT Background Previous literature suggests that lingering concussion symptoms may be influenced by psychological factors. The relationship of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) during recovery with pre-existing/injury related factors and concussion symptomology is not fully understood. Identification of factors contributing to symptoms of posttraumatic stress may provide guidance to improve treatment following concussion. Method This study included 287 participants (Male 40.42%, n = 116; Female 59.58%, n = 171) aged 13–75 years diagnosed with a recent concussion at one of the North Texas Concussion Registry (ConTex) specialty concussion clinic sites. Preinjury emotional history, injury related factors, and emotional state at time of initial evaluation were analyzed as predictors of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PCL-5) during recovery. Results Sixty-one percent of participants endorsed at least one PTSS. Correlations were found between initial Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5Ⓡ (SCAT5) total emotional symptom severity and screening measures for anxiety (GAD-7; r = .453, p < .001) and depression (PHQ-8; r = .550, p < .001) symptom scores. Of the measures from the initial visit included in the multiple regression model predicting severity of PTSS at follow-up (R2 = 0.554, β < .001), three measures predicted PTSS severity: initial SCAT5 total emotional symptom severity (β = 0.565, p < .001), PHQ-8 score (β =.166, p = .009), and GAD-7 score (β = 0.119, p = .044). Conclusions Symptoms of anxiety and depression along with specific SCAT5 emotional symptoms present at the time of initial evaluation may serve to predict overall level of PTSS and increased risk for PTSS during recovery. PTSS may be another dimension of response to injury and concussion recovery, with a large percentage of individuals endorsing at least one PTSS. Clinicians can utilize brief assessments such as the SCAT5 at the time of initial clinical evaluation to identify those at risk for PTSS following concussion.

SCAT Symptom Evolution in the Acute Concussion Phase: Findings From the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.

The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) is the most widely used tool following sport-related concussion (SRC). Initial SCAT symptom burden is a strong predictor of recovery in collegiate athletes; however, it is unknown if symptom presentation varies within the acute (<48 hours) post-SRC phase. The purpose of this cohort study was to examine acute SRC symptom presentation among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes. Concussed NCAA varsity athletes (n=1,780) from thirty universities across the United States that participated in the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium were included. Time of injury occurrence and SCAT administration data were recorded, from which time-to-SCAT (hours, continuous) was calculated. The main outcome was SCAT total symptom severity [(TSS), 0-126]. Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to examine the association between time (hours) since injury and TSS. Covariates included sex, previous concussion, sport contact level, amnesia/loss of consciousness, immediate reporting of injury, and injury situation. A random effect (person level) accounted for multiple assessments. TSS score ratios (SR) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were provided. The SCAT was administered an average of 14 (25th-75th percentile: 1.2-24) hours post-SRC, and average TSS was 27.35±21.28 across all participants. Time-to-SCAT was associated with a 1% decrease in TSS after adjusting for covariate effects (SR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99-0.99, p<0.001). Overall, we observed a small, but significant decrease in TSS with each hour post-SRC. Assessing a concussed athlete once in the acute phase will likely provide a sufficient sense of their symptomatic well-being, as measures did not fluctuate dramatically. Future research should aim to examine how acute symptom evolution influences recovery metrics.

Pediatric Concussions in Contact Sports: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of Mechanisms and Associated Symptoms.

Concussions make up a significant proportion of sports injuries. This study aimed to describe the mechanisms of injury and associated symptoms of pediatric patients diagnosed with concussions (age range, 4-17 years) from contact sports. Mechanisms of injury would differ based on sex and age, with female athletes and younger athletes aged 4 to 11 years sustaining fewer concussions from player-to-player contact. Descriptive epidemiology study. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was queried for all contact sport concussions presented to United States emergency departments. The sports analyzed included basketball, football, soccer, hockey, rugby, and lacrosse. Descriptive data, mechanisms of injury, and associated symptoms were analyzed for each sport. Differences in the number of concussions sustained by year and sport, the severity of the injury, and associated symptoms were compared using chi-square test, and differences in proportion were calculated for mechanisms of injury stratified by sex and age. A total of 12,602 youth athletes sustained concussions between 2012 and 2021. Most patients were male (78.5%), with a mean age of 13.48 years. Football concussions were the most common, with 45.32% of the concussions. The mechanism of injury was largely sport-specific, with player-to-player contact the most common overall. Older male athletes were more likely to have concussions from player-to-player contact, whereas younger athletes were more impacted by head-to-ground mechanisms. Symptom presentation was not sport-specific, and headache and dizziness were the most common presentation at 41.2% and 26.2%, respectively. The most important overall mechanism of injury was player-to-player contact, especially in older male youth athletes, whereas younger athletes were more likely to be concussed due to head-to-ground injuries.

Baseline Normative and Test-Retest Reliability Data for Sideline Concussion Assessment Measures in Youth.

Tools used for the identification, evaluation, and monitoring of concussion have not been sufficiently studied in youth or real-world settings. Normative and reliability data on sideline concussion assessment measures in the youth athlete population is needed. Pre-season normative data for 515 athletes (93.5% male) aged 5 to 16 on the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC/SAC-Child), modified Balance Errors Scoring System (mBESS), Timed Tandem Gait (TTG), and the King-Devick Test (KDT) are provided. A total of 212 non-injured athletes repeated the measures post-season to assess test-retest reliability. Mean performance on the SAC-C, mBESS, TTG, and KDT tended to improve with age. KDT was the only measure that demonstrated good to excellent stability across age ranges (ICC = 0.758 to 0.941). Concentration was the only SAC/SAC-C subtest to demonstrate moderate test-retest stability (ICC = 0.503 to 0.706). TTG demonstrated moderate to good (ICC = 0.666 to 0.811) reliability. mBESS demonstrated poor to moderate reliability (ICC = -0.309 to 0.651). Commonly used measures of concussion vary regarding test-retest reliability in youth. The data support the use of at least annual sport concussion baseline assessments in the pediatric population to account for the evolution in performance as the child ages. Understanding the variation in the stability and the evolution of baseline performance will enable improved identification of possible injury.

Assessment of Sports Concussion in Female Athletes: A Role for Neuroinformatics?

Over the past decade, the intricacies of sports-related concussions among female athletes have become readily apparent. Traditional clinical methods for diagnosing concussions suffer limitations when applied to female athletes, often failing to capture subtle changes in brain structure and function. Advanced neuroinformatics techniques and machine learning models have become invaluable assets in this endeavor. While these technologies have been extensively employed in understanding concussion in male athletes, there remains a significant gap in our comprehension of their effectiveness for female athletes. With its remarkable data analysis capacity, machine learning offers a promising avenue to bridge this deficit. By harnessing the power of machine learning, researchers can link observed phenotypic neuroimaging data to sex-specific biological mechanisms, unraveling the mysteries of concussions in female athletes. Furthermore, embedding methods within machine learning enable examining brain architecture and its alterations beyond the conventional anatomical reference frame. In turn, allows researchers to gain deeper insights into the dynamics of concussions, treatment responses, and recovery processes. This paper endeavors to address the crucial issue of sex differences in multimodal neuroimaging experimental design and machine learning approaches within female athlete populations, ultimately ensuring that they receive the tailored care they require when facing the challenges of concussions. Through better data integration, feature identification, knowledge representation, validation, etc., neuroinformaticists, are ideally suited to bring clarity, context, and explainabilty to the study of sports-related head injuries in males and in females, and helping to define recovery.

The Significance of Off-Season Tailor-Made Baseline Measurements in the Assessment of Post-Concussion in University Athletes.

This study aimed to investigate the significance of baseline measurements for amateur team athletes playing contact and collision team sports with a specific focus on the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) to improve concussion management. Symptoms of sports-related concussions (SRCs) can be diverse and long-lasting and include cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, and vestibular dysfunction. Therefore, comprehensive baseline data are essential to preventing recurrent concussions and secondary injuries. This study was conducted during the 2023 off-season and evaluated the baseline condition of 65 male university rugby players using the SCAT5, which includes self-reported symptoms, and the modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS). The athletes were assessed for the presence or absence of SRC, and the mean values were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Among the participants, 35.38% (23/65) reported symptoms, with an average of 1.5 ± 2.8 symptoms per player and an average symptom score of 2.66 ± 5.93. In the mBESS, no errors were observed in the tandem stance test; however, 72.31% (47/65) made errors in the single-leg stance test on the non-dominant foot, with an average of 1.7 ± 1.5 errors. Many athletes self-reported symptoms and balance errors, even during asymptomatic periods before experiencing concussion, indicating unresolved issues. In the injury history survey, the baseline evaluations and injury histories of the participants classified into the SRC and non-SRC groups were compared. In the mBESS single-leg stance test (non-dominant foot), 84.21% (32/38) of the SRC group participants made errors, with an average score of 2.13 ± 1.52, whereas 55.55% (15/27) of the non-SRC group participants made errors, with an average score of 1.15 ± 1.35, showing a significant difference (p = 0.007). Additionally, significant differences were observed in the average number of ankle sprains (p = 0.027) and fractures (p = 0.048) between patients with and without a history of SRC. These findings indicate that athletes may have underlying issues even during normal periods before concussion. Moreover, the results highlighted the impact of previous concussions on motor control and injury risk. This underscores the importance of preseason baseline measurements using the SCAT to identify at-risk athletes and implement preventive measures. These findings align with the recommendations of the 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport and suggest further refinement of concussion assessment tools.

Enhancing Protocols for Concussion Management in Professional Soccer Events.

Every year, there are an estimated 1.7 to 3.8 million sports-related traumatic brain injuries. A sports concussion results from an external force or a blow to the head or body, causing cranial encephalic trauma that can affect motor skills and brain function, producing varying symptoms related to an alteration in neurological functioning. Soccer poses a risk of concussions due to heading, where the player's head directly hits the ball to redirect or accelerate it. However, most concussions are caused by contact between players, such as head-to-head or head-to-elbow contact. This study analyzed the incidence of concussions or mild traumatic brain injuries in professional soccer during the "Copa America 2019"to understand the feasibility of soccer concussion protocols and propose evidence-based enhancements. The data were previously collectedby our first two authors, O. Pangrazioand F. Forriol, during the 46th edition of the "Copa America 2019," where the South American Football Confederation implementedthe Concussion Fast Recognition Protocolto detect traumatic brain injuries. The descriptive basic data will help to raise awareness and motivate further research in this field. We have analyzed and correlated it with global data to provide a comprehensive review and tangible evidence of the population size where soccer protocols are typically applied, thus calculating incidence rates to measure it mathematically. Our study reveals that the incidence rate of concussions during the "Copa America 2019"was 5.3 per 1,000 athlete exposures, with a total of three concussions occurring among 567 players. Despite the effectiveness of current protocols in detecting concussions rapidly and accurately, the relatively low incidence rate at this level of professional competition poses a challenge to validating these protocols. These results indicate that while the protocols in place are efficient, the testing and validation of new tools and approaches would be more beneficial at different levels of play where the incidence rates of concussions are higher. In environments with a greater frequency of concussions, the robustness and reliability of these protocols can be more thoroughly evaluated, ensuring they provide optimal protection and care for athletes. The incidence of concussions is low in professional soccer tournaments. Protocols are necessary to protect players and educate sports professionals. However, their validation is difficult given the low incidence of concussions at this level of competition. Our proposed protocol helps unify a basic approach in the field and an advanced approach in any emergency department, providing better detection of concussions and improved outcomes for players. This protocol should be validated in populations with higher incidence rates to demonstrate its effectiveness.

A - 06 Examining Consumer Feedback on the 2023 International Conference Consensus Statement on Concussion In Sport

A - 06 Examining Consumer Feedback on the 2023 International Conference Consensus Statement on Concussion In Sport

A - 15 Incorporating the Child Opportunity Index and Area Deprivation Index in Sport Concussion Research

Abstract Purpose Social determinants of health, including socioeconomic status (SES) and neighborhood characteristics, are underrepresented in concussion research. We examined two measures of neighborhood advantage and opportunity among patients accessing a multidisciplinary sports concussion clinic in Greater Boston. Method We collected the Child Opportunity Index (COI) and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) state decile scores and national percentile ranks for all new patients who presented to our clinic in 2023. The COI is an index of neighborhood conditions that may impact childhood development (e.g., education quality, SES, access to healthy food) with ratings from Very Low to Very High. The ADI characterizes an area’s socioeconomic conditions (e.g., income, housing quality, employment, education), with higher scores representing more disadvantage. Results There were 247 new patients who visited the clinic (Mage = 17.5, SDage = 5.2, 47.8% Girls/Women, 81.4% White, 4.0% Black, 6.5% Asian, 4.9% Hispanic). The majority lived in an area with a High or Very High state COI (74%) and High or Very High national COI (88%). The median ADI state decile was 2.00 (IQR = 1.00–4.00) and the median national percentile was 10.00 (IQR = 5.00–18.00) (representing the highest 10% of advantage). The state deciles for the two measures were correlated (Spearman rho = 0.64), but not redundant. Conclusions The COI and ADI are important, accessible measures of SES that can be included in future studies. Patients from low SES were greatly underrepresented in the clinic compared to the population of our metropolitan area. Patients were predominantly from higher SES, consistent with prior studies suggesting socioeconomic disparities accessing specialty concussion care.

A - 26 A Survey of Sports Concussion Specialists’Clinical Criteria to Determine Concussion Recovery

Abstract Purpose To identify criteria used by sports concussion specialists in determining recovery from sport-related concussion. We hypothesized differences in use of decision-making criteria among neuropsychologists, physicians, and certified athletic trainers (ATCs). Method 143 sports concussion specialists (neuropsychologists = 45, physicians = 41, and certified athletic trainers (ATCs) = 57) completed a survey rating the importance of specific criteria for determining concussion recovery in youth and adult athletes. Differences between specialist groups were examined with Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results There were significant differences in criteria ratings across specialist groups regarding youth and adults for “use of neurocognitive test scores,”“balance testing,”“physical examination,”“no symptom provocation with neurocognitive testing,”“athlete report of anxiety about return to sport,“and “family member’s report of recovery,“all p’s &amp;lt; 0.001. For youth and adults, physicians ranked “use of neurocognitive test scores”and “no symptom provocation with neurocognitive testing”as less important than other providers, while “physician examination”was ranked as more important. Neuropsychologists ranked “balance testing”and “athlete report of anxiety about return to sport”as less important than other providers; and ATCs ranked “family member’s report of recovery”as less important than other providers. Conclusions Our results advance understanding of multidisciplinary standards of care in determining recovery from sports concussion and suggest the importance of collaboration in establishing clinical criteria common to all sports concussion health care providers.