Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt Research Articles

Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of spontaneous portosystemic shunt in patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis: A multicenter study from China

The impact of spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) on decompensated events and mortality for patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis remains poorly investigated.To evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of SPSS among patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis.Patients who were diagnosed with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis were retrospectively recruited. All eligible patients were classified into SPSS and non-SPSS groups and their clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared and analyzed.Of the 1282 patients included in this study, SPSS was identified in 488 patients (38.1%). SPSS group had more severe liver function impairment, higher prevalence and severity of esophageal and gastric varices (EGV), and a higher prevalence of EGV bleeding (EGVB), portal vein thrombosis (PVT), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), ascites, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, all P<0.05). During the follow-up period, SPSS group experienced a significantly higher incidence of EGVB, PVT, and HE (all P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of ascites, HCC, and mortality between the two groups (all P>0.05).With hepatitis B-related cirrhosis, SPSS was common and characterized by severe liver damage and a high prevalence of decompensated events. Moreover, patients with SPSS had higher risks of EGVB, PVT, and HE.

A model for predicting poor survival in patients with cirrhosis undergoing portosystemic shunt embolization.

Portosystemic shunt embolization (PSSE) is a promising treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HEP) and gastric varix (GV) in cirrhotic patients with a spontaneous portosystemic shunt. However, PSSE may worsen portal hypertension causing hepatorenal syndrome, liver failure, and mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic model that helps identify patients with a risk of poor short-term survival after PSSE. We included 188 patients who underwent PSSE for recurrent HEP or GV at a tertiary center in Korea. To develop a prediction model for 6-month survival after PSSE, Cox proportional-hazard model was used. The developed model was validated in a separate cohort of 184 patients from two other tertiary centers. In multivariable analysis, the 1-year overall survival after PSSE was significantly associated with baseline levels of serum albumin, total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio (INR). We therefore developed the albumin-bilirubin-INR (ABI) score by assigning 1 point each for albumin <3.0g/dL, total bilirubin ≥1.5mg/dL, and INR≥1.5. Time-dependent areas under the curve of the ABI score for predicting 3-month and 6-month survival were 0.85 and 0.85 in the development cohort and 0.83 and 0.78 in the validation cohort, indicating good discrimination performance. The ABI score showed a better discrimination and calibration performance than the model for end-stage liver disease and the Child-Pugh scores, especially in high-risk patients. The ABI score is a simple prognostic model that helps decide whether to proceed with PSSE for the prevention of HEP or GV bleeding in patients with spontaneous portosystemic shunt.

Vascular Plug-Assisted Retrograde Obliteration (PARTO) of Right Mesorenal Shunt for Hepatic Encephalopathy: An Uncommon Site of a Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhosis.

Vascular Plug-Assisted Retrograde Obliteration (PARTO) of Right Mesorenal Shunt for Hepatic Encephalopathy: An Uncommon Site of a Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhosis.

Massive spontaneous portosystemic shunt is a solid, easily identifiable prognostic factor in patients with cirrhosis.

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs) are associated with complications and death in cirrhosis. We evaluated chronic portosystemic encephalopathy (CPSE) and survival in cirrhotic patients with massive (>10 mm diameter) SPSS (MSPSS). We have retrospectively compared 77 cirrhotic patients with MSPSS and 77 paired-matched patients without SPSS. More patients with MSPSS presented with CPSE (40.3% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.010) or died (33.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.039). Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score [hazard ratio (HR) 1.146, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.099-1.195], follow-up (FU) ascites (HR 5.128, 95% CI 2.396-10.973) and age (HR 1.048, 95% CI 1.017-1.080) were associated with CPSE; and MELD score (HR 1.082, 95% CI 1.035-1.131), FU renal failure (HR 9.319, 95% CI 3.595-24.158), and FU ascites (HR 4.320, 95% CI 1.615-11.555) were associated with death. Liver function worsened faster in the MSPSS group. Among patients with better liver function (MELD < 11.5), MSPSS patients presented worse survival (P = 0.048, Breslow test). Comparing patients by the Child-Pugh group, we did not find differences in survival; in patients from Child-Pugh group B + C, the MSPSS group presented less time free of CPSE (P < 0.05, log-rank test). Patients with splenorenal MSPSS presented better survival (P = 0.04, log-rank test), and patients with umbilical MSPSS had shorter time free of CPSE (P < 0.016, log-rank test). MSPSS increased CPSE and death risks during long FU. Even with better liver function (MELD < 11.5), MSPSS was associated with lower survival. Splenorenal MSPSS presented better survival and the umbilical type was associated with shorter time free of CPSE.

Abstract No. 214 Combined Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation and Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt Embolization for Hepatic Encephalopathy

Abstract No. 214 Combined Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation and Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt Embolization for Hepatic Encephalopathy

Reply.

We appreciate the interest of Lo in our recent study published in Hepatology.1 First, the indication of TIPS in our trial was gastroesophageal variceal bleeding occurring within the past 6 to 42 days despite the endoscopic plus nonselective beta blockers for secondary prophylaxis, which is in agreement with current practice guidelines.2 Second, we agree with Lo that the prior history of HE (hepatic encephalopathy) could increase the risk of HE after TIPS. Thus, we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with previous HE (Figure 3B in the original study).1 Nevertheless, the conclusion that concurrent embolization of large spontaneous portosystemic shunt reduced the incidence, severity and frequency of post-TIPS overt HE is not changed. Third, the survival was not significantly different in our trial. However, it should be noted that the sample size was calculated based on the primary endpoint (overt HE) and our study is not powerful enough to detect the differences of survival.1 Finally, showed that rifaximin reduced the risk of HE after TIPS when administered 15 days before the procedure and maintained 6 months after,3 while an earlier trial showed that lactulose had no such protective effect.4 In our opinion, the impact of lactulose on the post-TIPS HE merits more investigation.

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices with high-risk ectopic embolism: A multicenter and retrospective cohort study.

Gastric varices (GV) with spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) are associated with ectopic embolism in endoscopic cyanoacrylate. This study targeted to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) for GV with high-risk ectopic embolism. We retrospectively analyzed six tertiary hospitals' 104 patients with GV at high-risk ectopic embolism (the narrowest diameter of SPSS was greater than or equal to 5 mm and the maximum diameter usually >8 mm) who underwent EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection or BRTO from January 2014 to December 2020. The outcomes included rebleeding, survival, and complications. The EUS group and BRTO group contained 59 and 45 patients, respectively. The technical success rate between the two groups was similar (96.6% vs. 95.6%, P = 1.000). During the follow-up, both groups' 5-day rebleeding rate and 6-week mortality rate were 0%. One-year all-cause rebleeding rate (20.0% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.900) and 1-year mortality rate (2.0% vs. 0%, P = 1.000) in the EUS group were similar to the BRTO group. One patient experienced ectopic embolism in the EUS group, while the BRTO group did not. Both groups had similar mean days (16.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 12.0-19.0] vs. 16.5 [IQR, 11.8-26.0], P = 0.165) and cost of hospitalization (¥ 45950.6 [IQR, 39330.2-55768.2] vs. ¥ 51205.8 [IQR, 31628.8-74251.5], P = 0.680). Multivariate analysis showed that the narrowest diameter of the shunt (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.062-3.258; P = 0.03) and content of hemoglobin (OR = 0.941; 95% CI: 0.892-0.992; P = 0.025) were the prognostic factors for survival. The efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for GV with high-risk ectopic embolism are comparable to BRTO.

Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension after Trastuzumab Emtansine in HER2-positive Breast Cancer as Determined by Deep Learning-measured Spleen Volume at CT.

Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Case reports have suggested an association between T-DM1 and portal hypertension. Purpose To evaluate the association of T-DM1 therapy with spleen volume changes and portal hypertension on CT scans and clinical findings compared with lapatinib and capecitabine therapy. Materials and Methods Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who were administered at least two cycles of T-DM1 or lapatinib and capecitabine (controls) in a tertiary institution from 2001 to 2020 and who underwent CT before initial treatment and at least once during treatment were retrospectively enrolled. Spleen volume changes and the signs of portal hypertension (gastroesophageal varix [GEV], spontaneous portosystemic shunt [SPSS], and ascites) were evaluated at contrast-enhanced CT. Patients were followed until treatment ended or for 2 years after the start of treatment. Spleen volume changes were measured with a deep learning algorithm and evaluated by using a linear mixed model. The incidences of splenomegaly and portal hypertension were compared between the T-DM1 and control groups by using a χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Results The T-DM1 group included 111 patients (mean age, 54 years ± 11 [SD]; 111 women) and the control group included 122 patients (mean age, 50 years ± 9; 121 women). Spleen volume progressively increased with T-DM1 therapy but was constant in the control group (104% ± 5 vs -1% ± 6 at the 33rd treatment cycle, respectively; P < .001). Incidences of splenomegaly (46% [51 of 111] vs 3% [four of 122] of patients; P < .001), GEV (11% [12 of 111] vs 1% [one of 122] of patients; P < .001), and SPSS (27% [30 of 111] vs 1% [one of 122] of patients; P < .001) were higher in the T-DM1 group than in the control group. Conclusion Trastuzumab emtansine therapy was associated with noncirrhotic portal hypertension at CT, with higher incidences of splenomegaly, gastroesophageal varix, and spontaneous portosystemic shunt than those with lapatinib and capecitabine therapy. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

FRI508 - Simultaneous large spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization for the prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: a randomized controlled trial

FRI508 - Simultaneous large spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization for the prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: a randomized controlled trial

Computed Tomography Images of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Cirrhosis.

Spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) refers to collateral vessels that communicate between the portal vein system and systemic circulation. SPSS mainly includes esophageal varices, gastric varices, left gastric vein, recanalized paraumbilical vein, abdominal wall varices, and spontaneous splenorenal shunt. SPSS contributes to the development of hepatic encephalopathy caused by portal vein inflow bypassing and carries a higher risk of death in liver cirrhosis. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography is a major imaging approach to establish a diagnosis of SPSS and evaluate its location and feature. This review primarily describes the main contrast-enhanced CT features of SPSS in liver cirrhosis.

Abstract No. 229 Does spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization improve liver transplantation outcomes? A propensity-score matched analysis

Patients with large spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are theoretically at risk for post liver transplant (LT) portal vein thrombosis (PVT) due to reduced hepatopetal flow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in portal venous velocity from SPSS embolization with TIPS, and to compare post-LT outcomes in patients with vs without embolization ± TIPS for large SPSS. The hypothesis was SPSS embolization ± TIPS would improve portal venous velocity and reduce LT complications, specifically PVT and 30-day mortality.

Concurrent large spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization for the prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: A randomized controlled trial.

Large spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) is associated with increased risk of HE in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This study aimed to evaluate whether prophylactic embolization of large SPSS at the time of TIPS creation could reduce the incidence of post-TIPS HE in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. From June 2014 to August 2017, 56 patients with cirrhosis and large SPSS planning to undergo TIPS for the prevention of variceal bleeding were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive TIPS alone (TIPS group, n=29) or TIPS plus simultaneous SPSS embolization (TIPS+E group, n=27). The primary endpoint was overt HE. TIPS placement and SPSS embolization was successful in all patients. During a median follow-up of 24 months, the primary endpoint was met in 15 patients (51.7%) in the TIPS group and six patients (22.2%) in the TIPS+E group (p=0.045). The 2-year cumulative incidence of overt HE was significantly lower in the TIPS+E group compared with the TIPS group (21.2% vs. 48.3%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97; p=0.043). The 2-year incidence of recurrent bleeding (TIPS+E vs. TIPS, 15.4% vs. 25.1%; p=0.522), shunt dysfunction (12.3% vs. 18.6%, p=0.593), death (15.0% vs. 6.9%, p=0.352), and other adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. In patients with cirrhosis treated with TIPS for variceal bleeding, concurrent large SPSS embolization reduced the risk for overt HE without increasing other complications. Concurrent large SPSS embolization should therefore be considered for prophylaxis of post-TIPS HE.

Combination of Fat-Free Muscle Index and Total Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt Area Identifies High-Risk Cirrhosis Patients.

BackgroundSarcopenia and spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs) are common complications of liver cirrhosis, and both are associated with higher rates of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) development in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the simultaneous impact of skeletal muscle mass and spontaneous portosystemic shunting, measured from routine diagnostic CT on outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients with cirrhosis. Skeletal muscle mass [including fat-free muscle index (FFMI) as a surrogate for sarcopenia] and total cross-sectional spontaneous portosystemic shunt area (TSA) were quantified from CT scans. The primary endpoint was the development of HE, while the secondary endpoint was 1-year mortality.ResultsOne hundred fifty-six patients with liver cirrhosis were included. Patients with low (L-) FFMI and large (L-)TSA showed higher rates of HE development. In multivariable analysis, L-FFMI and L-TSA were independent predictors of HE development (L-FFMI HR = 2.69, CI 1.22–5.93; L-TSA, HR = 2.50, CI = 1.24–4.72) and 1-year mortality (L-FFMI, HR = 7.68, CI 1.75–33.74; L-TSA, HR = 3.05, CI 1.32–7.04). The simultaneous presence of L-FFMI and L-TSA exponentially increased the risk of HE development (HR 12.79, CI 2.93–55.86) and 1-year mortality (HR 13.66, CI 1.75–106.50). An easy sequential algorithm including FFMI and TSA identified patients with good, intermediate, and poor prognoses.ConclusionThis study indicates synergy between low skeletal muscle mass and large TSA to predict exponentially increased risk of HE development and mortality in liver cirrhosis. Simultaneous screening for sarcopenia and TSA from routine diagnostic CT may help to improve the identification of high-risk patients using an easy-to-apply algorithm.Clinical Trial registration[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03584204].

Spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatic encephalopathy

Introduction and objectivesSpontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are a common cause of recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Shunt occlusion is an effective and safe procedure when performed in patients with cirrhosis and preserved liver function. We aimed to describe our experience with SPSS embolization after liver transplantation (LT). PatientsWe identified five patients who underwent SPSS embolization after LT. Clinical, biochemical and technical procedure data were collected. ResultsAt presentation, all patients had developed graft cirrhosis and HE after LT. Median Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) at embolization was 9 (range 7-12), median Child-Pugh was 8 (range 7-9). Splenorenal and mesocaval shunt were the most frequent types of SPSS found. Three patients have been completely free of HE. Of the two patients who had HE recurrence after embolization, one patient had two episodes of HE which was controlled well with medications. The other patient required three embolizations because of recurrent HE. Median follow-up was 4.4 years (range 1.0-5.0) and MELD score at last follow up was 13 (range 10-18) and median Child-Pugh score B, 7 points (range 5-12). ConclusionsSPSS can be considered as a cause of HE after LT. SPSS embolization is feasible and safe in LT recipients.

Spontaneous portosystemic shunt diameter predicts liver function after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration.

Background and AimRecently, balloon‐occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), performed for spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS), has been receiving attention as a measure to improve liver function in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. However, it is unclear whether SPSS diameter is associated with changes in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and liver function after BRTO.MethodsIn 34 cirrhotic patients receiving BRTO for hepatic encephalopathy/gastric varices, the association of SPSS diameter with liver function at baseline and 6 months after BRTO and the accompanying changes in HVPG were investigated.ResultsPatients had Child–Pugh (CP) scores of A/B/C (7/19/8), SPSS diameters of ≤10 mm/11–20 mm/<20 mm (8/21/5), and an average observation period of 3.2 (0.3–8.5) years. SPSS diameter was significantly associated with male sex, alcohol use, and values of albumin, prothrombin time (PT%), and NH3 at baseline. Moreover, the SPSS diameter was significantly correlated with the changes in HVPG observed upon BRTO (r = 0.55, P = 0.005), and a large shunt diameter was significantly associated with a greater increase in HVPG. At 6 months, significant improvements in albumin, PT%, bilirubin, and NH3 were observed overall, but the improvement was marked in those with larger shunt diameters if they had CP A/B.ConclusionSPSS diameter was strongly associated with liver function at baseline and after BRTO and also with changes in HVPG, indicating that SPSS diameter is an important predictor of BRTO outcome.

Is Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt a Killer or a Helper for Patients with Cirrhosis?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Is Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt a Killer or a Helper for Patients with Cirrhosis?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of complications in patients with portal hypertension.

This review focuses on ultrasonography (US) to diagnose patients with complications in portal hypertension. Clinicians first use US to evaluate patients with suspected portal hypertension, because US is quick, simple, and radiation free. US is necessary for grading and performing paracentesis for ascites. Doppler US-based detection of reverse splanchnic vein flow or the presence of a spontaneous portosystemic shunt is highly specific in patients with cirrhosis. Since it is important to estimate spleen size in patients with portal hypertension, spleen size is usually measured by US. Spleen volume can be more accurately measured with 3D-US. Estimation of viable residual splenic volume after partial splenic embolization should be limited to cases with total splenic volume less than 1000ml. Portal vein thrombosis is often detected during the US examination performed when symptoms first appear or during the follow-up. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography is an excellent noninvasive screening test in patients with pulmonary portal hypertension who can undergo it. By measuring the maximum and minimum diastolic blood flow velocities in the renal arteries using renal color Doppler US, the pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI) can be calculated. The PI and RI in cirrhotic patients were significantly higher than those in healthy subjects and patients with chronic hepatitis, and showed a significant positive correlation with the Child-Pugh Score. In conclusion, US is an essential tool for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with portal hypertension.

Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt Ligation During Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Journal of the American College of Surgeons: November 2021 - Volume 233 - Issue 5 - p S192-S193 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.07.392

Research advances in cirrhotic portal hypertension with spontaneous portosystemic shunt

Liver cirrhosis is the end stage of various chronic liver diseases, and portal hypertension is a main complication of liver cirrhosis. In this pathological state, spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS), as the collateral circulation of the portal venous system, has not attracted enough attention in terms of occurrence mechanism and clinical value. The analysis shows that although SPSS is a natural shunt channel, further studies are still needed to clarify whether it can be used as a decompression method for portal hypertension, and a deeper understanding of SPSS will provide important guiding significance for the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension.

Life-Threatening Portal Flow Steal Reappearing Under Increased Intrahepatic Vascular Resistance After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Maintenance of adequate portal inflow is crucial for graft regeneration in adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) to allow the recipients to meet their early metabolic demands. A persistent large spontaneous portosystemic shunt can divert portal flow away from the liver graft, leading to impaired or delayed graft regeneration and subsequent graft failure. The importance of obliterating huge portosystemic shunt during liver transplantation is obvious for successful ALDLT. However, in partial liver graft with a relatively small graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) (compared with deceased donor whole graft liver transplantation), even the persisting small portosystemic shunt may result in repeated portal flow steal when a liver graft faces increased intrahepatic vascular resistance caused by rejection or graft congestion with hepatic venous outflow stenosis. We present 2 complicated cases of reappearing portal flow steal that were derived from the remaining small portosystemic shunt under the increased vascular resistance of the liver graft, even after interruption of a large portosystemic shunt during ALDLT. Because ALDLT is always a partial liver graft, even when GRWR is over 1%, it is much more vulnerable to hemodynamic changes in portal flow by rejection or graft congestion by hepatic venous outflow obstruction. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of complex portosystemic shunt and complete reinterruption of reappearing portosystemic shunt, even though small and insignificant, during ALDLT is important for graft salvage procedures before irreversible liver graft damage.