Splenic Trauma In Children Research Articles

Single centre analysis of factors influencing surgical treatment of splenic trauma in children.

This study aims to investigate determinants impacting the surgical management of splenic trauma in paediatric patients by scrutinizing age distribution, etiological factors and concomitant injuries. The analysis seeks to establish a foundation for delineating optimal operative timing. A cohort of 262 paediatric cases presenting with splenic trauma at our institution from January 2011 to December 2021 underwent categorization into either the conservative or operative group. Significantly disparate attributes between the two groups included age, time of presentation, blood pressure, haemoglobin levels, blood transfusion requirements, thermal absorption, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification and associated injuries. Logistic regression analysis revealed age, haemoglobin levels, AAST classification and blood transfusion as autonomous influencers of surgical intervention (OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 1.011-1.037; OR = 1.067, 95% CI: 1.01-1.127; OR = 0.2760, 95% CI: 0.087-0.875; OR = 7.873, 95% CI: 2.442-25.382; OR = 0.016, 95% CI: 0.002-0.153). The AAST type and age demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.782 and 0.618, respectively. Age, haemoglobin levels, AAST classification and blood transfusion independently influence the decision for surgical intervention in paediatric patients with splenic trauma. Age and AAST classification emerge as viable parameters for assessing and prognosticating the likelihood of surgical intervention in this patient cohort.

European Pediatric Surgeons' Association Survey on the Use of Splenic Embolization in Blunt Splenic Trauma in Children.

This article assesses (1) access to splenic embolization (SE), (2) indications for SE, and (3) post-embolization management in high-grade splenic trauma in children. An online questionnaire was sent in 2021 to all members of European Pediatric Surgeons' Association. There were a total of 157 responses (50 countries, 83% academic hospitals). Among them, 68% have access to SE (SE) and 32% do not (nSE). For a hemodynamic stable patient with high-grade isolated splenic trauma without contrast extravasation (CE) on computed tomography (CT) scan, 99% SE and 95% nSE respondents use nonoperative management (NOM). In cases with CE, NOM decreases to 50% (p = 0.01) and 51% (p = 0.007) in SE and nSE centers, respectively. SE respondents report a significant reduction of NOM in stable patients with an associated spine injury requiring urgent surgery in prone position, both without and with CE (90 and 28%, respectively). For these respondents, in stable patients the association of a femur fracture only tends to decrease the NOM, both without and with CE (93 and 39%, respectively). There was no significant difference in NOM in group nSE with associated injuries with or without CE. After proximal SE with preserved spleen vascularization on ultrasound Doppler, 44% respondents prescribe antibiotics and/or immunizations. Two-thirds of respondents have access to SE. For SE respondents, SE is used even in stable patients when CE showed on initial CT scan and its use increased with the concomitant need for spinal surgery. There is currently a variation in the use of SE and antibiotics/immunizations following SE.

Management of Pseudoaneurysms Formed after Blunt Splenic Trauma in Children

Management of Pseudoaneurysms Formed after Blunt Splenic Trauma in Children

Органосохраняющие тенденции в лечении детей с закрытой травмой селезенки

Органосохраняющие тенденции в лечении детей с закрытой травмой селезенки

Results of non-operative management of splenic trauma and its complications in children.

Introduction:Non-operative management (NOM) of splenic trauma in children is currently the treatment of choice.Purpose:We report a series of 83 cases in order to compare our results with literature data.Patients and Methods:For this, we conducted a retrospective study of 13 years and collected 83 cases of children with splenic trauma contusion, managed at Lapeyronie Montpellier Hospital in Visceral Pediatric Surgery Department. The studied parameters were age, sex, circumstances, the blood pressure (BP), hematology, imaging, associated injuries, transfusion requirements, treatment, duration of hospital stay, physical activity restriction and evolution.Results:NOM was successful in 98.7% of cases. We noted 4 complications including 3 pseudo aneurysms (PSA) of splenic artery and 1 pseudocyst spleen with a good prognosis. There was no mortality in our series.Conclusion:NOM is the treatment of choice for splenic trauma in children with a success rate of over 90%. Complications are rare and are dominated by the PSA of splenic artery.

小児肝外傷, 脾外傷の診断・治療の検討

小児肝外傷, 脾外傷の診断・治療の検討

Blunt Splenic Trauma in Children: Are We Too Careful?

There has been a shift from operative treatment (OT) to non-operative treatment (NOT) of splenic injury. We evaluated the outcomes of treatment of pediatric patients with blunt splenic trauma in our hospital, with special focus on the outcomes after NOT. The data of all patients <18 years with radiologically proven blunt splenic injury admitted between 1988 and 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. Mechanism of injury, type of treatment, ICU stay, total hospital stay, morbidity and mortality were assessed. Patients suffering isolated splenic injuries were assessed separately from patients with multiple injuries. Patients were subsequently divided into those admitted before and after 2000. There were 64 patients: 49 males and 15 females with a mean age of 13 years (range 0-18). 3 patients died shortly after admission due to severe neurological injury and were excluded. In the remaining 61 patients concomitant injuries, present in 62%, included long bone fractures (36%), chest injuries (16%), abdominal injuries (33%) and head injuries (30%). Mechanisms of injury were: car accidents (26%), motorcycle (20%), bicycle (19%), fall from height (17%) and pedestrians struck by a moving vehicle (8%). A change in treatment strategy was evident for the pre- and post-2000 periods. Significantly more patients had NOT after 2000 in both the isolated splenic injury group and the multi-trauma group [4/11 (36%) before vs. 10/11 (91%) after (p=0.009); 15/19 (79%) before vs. 8/20 (40%) after 2000 (p=0.03)]. There was also a significant shift to spleen-preserving operations. All life-threatening complications occurred within <24 h after injury. Mortality for the entire cohort was 7%; all of these patients were treated operatively. When comparing the median ICU and hospital stay before and after 2000 it was found to be significantly higher in the isolated injury group and remained statistically the same in the multi-trauma group. Splenic injury in children is associated with substantial mortality. This is due to concomitant injuries and not to the splenic injury. Non-operative treatment is increasingly preferred to operative procedures when treating splenic injuries in hemodynamically, stable children. ICU and hospital stay have, despite the change from OT to NOT, remained the same. Complications after NOT are rare. We are still observing children in hospital for a longer period than is necessary.

Subtle Radiological Features of Splenic Avulsion following Abdominal Trauma

Splenic trauma in children following blunt abdominal injury is usually treated by nonoperative management (NOM). Splenectomy following abdominal trauma is rare in children. NOM is successful as in the majority of instances the injury to the spleen is contained within its capsule or a localised haematoma. Rarely, the spleen may suffer from an avulsion injury that causes severe uncontrollable bleeding and necessitates an emergency laparotomy and splenectomy. We report two cases of children requiring splenectomy following severe blunt abdominal injury. In both instances emergency laparotomy was undertaken for uncontrollable bleeding despite resuscitation. The operating team was unaware of the precise source of bleeding preoperatively. Retrospective review of the computed tomography (CT) scans revealed subtle radiological features that indicate splenic avulsion. We wish to highlight these radiological features of splenic avulsion as they can help to focus management decisions regarding the need/timing for a laparotomy following blunt abdominal trauma in children.

Long-term outcome of nonoperative pediatric splenic injury management

Background Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic trauma is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable children. The long-term risk of this strategy remains unknown. The object of this study was to investigate the incidence of long-term complications after NOM of pediatric splenic injury. Methods All children who underwent NOM for blunt splenic trauma over an 11-year period were identified. Patients were interviewed for any ailments that could be related to their splenic injury, and hospital data were analyzed. Results A total of 266 patients were identified, and 228 patients (86%) were interviewed. Mean follow-up time was 5 ± 3 years. One patient had a delayed complication, a splenic pseudocyst. Pain more than 4 weeks after injury was unusual. Time until return to full activity varied broadly. Conclusion The incidence of long-term complications after NOM of pediatric splenic injury was 1 (0.44%) in 228 patients. Nonoperative management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma in children is associated with a minimal risk of long-term complications.

Non‐operative management for blunt splenic trauma in children: An updated literature review

Introduction: The spleen is the most frequently injured abdominal organ in blunt trauma. In the past, any damaged spleen was surgically removed to avoid delayed rupture. Overwhelming infection is a real threat in asplenic children. Therefore, management of blunt splenic injuries has continued to change over the past 20 years towards non‐operative management (NOM) and splenic conservation.Methods and Materials: Twenty‐seven international articles on management of traumatic splenic rupture regarding advances in investigative techniques, treatment modalities and management protocols were reviewed.Results: With the advent of improved intensive care, interventional radiology and trauma protocols, it is reported that blunt splenic injuries can now be managed conservatively with a success rate of 85%. Computed tomography remains the gold standard of investigation in a stable patient. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) offers a useful diagnostic tool in an unstable patient in whom the source of hypovolaemia is uncertain. However, negative FAST does not exclude haemoperitoneum. Furthermore, guidelines complemented by a comprehensive grading system have been devised to identify those patients who could avoid splenectomy. Experienced radiologists have advocated angio‐embolization in stable patients, and their NOM has increased by 15%, although availability is limited. Post‐discharge instructions are routinely given to parents and patients for successful recovery from NOM of splenic rupture.Conclusion: Surgeons must be familiar with these options in order to offer the safest and most effective care for children with splenic lacerations.

Nonoperative management of delayed splenic rupture in a patient with hemophilia B

Nonoperative management of splenic lacerations has become the standard of care in hemodynamically stable patients. The decision to manage a patient nonoperatively is much more difficult when the patient has a known bleeding disorder. There are a few case reports in the literature describing nonoperative management of splenic trauma in children with hemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency), but only one case report of a patient with hemophilia B (factor IX deficiency) and a splenic laceration successfully managed nonoperatively. We present the case of a 13-year-old boy who presented with a grade 4 splenic laceration, acute blood loss anemia, and hypotension that was managed nonoperatively.

Complications Occurring During Conservative Management of Splenic Trauma in Children

Conservative management of splenic rupture in haemodynamically stable children is now generally accepted. However, during follow-up, many complications can occur. The aim of this study was to describe the complications we observed and to propose a standardised follow-up adapted to them. Between March 1992 and December 2002 we managed 65 children (aged between 3 and 15 years old) with accidental splenic rupture. Follow-up and treatment consisted of a 10-day bed rest with sonogram and Doppler controls on the 5th and 10th day and subsequently every month until complete healing. Complications included secondary haemorrhage in 3 cases, cystic evolution in 5 cases, and pseudo-aneurysm in 2 cases. All were treated by renewed bed rest. Three of the cysts resolved spontaneously, the other two underwent cystic resection and epiploplasty by laparotomy (n = 1) or laparoscopy (n = 1) and both pseudo-aneurysms were selectively embolised. There were no splenectomies. Complications essentially occurred in older children and were not related to gender, type of fracture, or extent of bleeding. Cystic evolution of the sub-capsular haematomas can appear up to 1 month after trauma. Peripheral pseudo-aneurysms which could be responsible for secondary haemorrhages were selectively embolised. We favour the use of the Doppler sonogram for follow-up until total recovery of these patients, even in low-grade traumas. Considering the number of complications encountered we do not believe the American evidence-based guidelines are suitable for our population.

Evolution of non‐operative management for blunt splenic trauma in children

Until the late 1960s, splenectomy was routinely performed in children who had sustained blunt splenic injury. There was based on the ability to perform splenectomy without obvious consequence; the cited 90-100% mortality for splenic trauma and the possibility of delayed rupture of the spleen. In contrast, contemporary findings in immunology and surgery demonstrated that non-operative management was not only feasible but desirable in view of the potential for overwhelming post-plenectomy infection. The history of universal splenectomy following blunt splenic trauma has been reviewed and we outline the findings that have resulted in the current standard of non-operative management following blunt splenic trauma.

Management of blunt hepatic and splenic trauma in children

Management of blunt hepatic and splenic trauma in children

The function of the spleen in adults after ligation of the splenic artery of the traumatized spleen in childhood

Background. Ligation of the splenic artery (LSA) has been successfully used as a spleen-saving procedure in rare cases of splenic trauma in children in which management with splenorrhaphy or partial splenectomy alone was not possible. There are no data regarding the long-term effects of the procedure on the functional status of the spleen. The purpose of this study is to present and discuss our clinical and laboratory findings in adults who underwent LSA in childhood. Methods. Our first 2 patients in whom LSA was done at ages 4 and 2 years in 1977 underwent the following examinations in the year 2000: 1, imaging of the spleen; 2, immunologic studies; and 3, peripheral blood tests. Their ages at reexamination were 27 and 25 years, respectively. Results. Results were as follows: triplex ultrasound revealed normal size and echomorphology; Doppler techniques revealed normal vasculature; 99mTc-Tin colloid scanning revealed normal uptake. Immunoglobulins (IgG1 to IgG4, IgA, IgM, IgE), complement fraction (C3, C4), antibodies response to vaccinations, and peripheral blood tests all had normal results. No Howell-Jolly bodies were found. Conclusion. Laboratory investigations in adults with LSA during childhood disclosed undisturbed function of the spleen. LSA can be used as an adjunct to splenorrhaphy in children with rare splenic injuries involving major hilar vessels. (Surgery 2003;133:583-5.)

Diagnostic imaging in the follow-up of nonoperative management of splenic trauma in children.

The spleen is the most frequently injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is approximately 95% sensitive and specific for detection of splenic injury. In children, nonoperative treatment is well-established. The basic tenet of such management is an obligatory period of rest to prevent recurrent bleeding and allow splenic healing. Splenic preservation prevents post-splenectomy sepsis. At our level I trauma center, pediatric patients (N=54) with BAT between 1993 and 1998 were retrospectively studied. Two (3.7%) died of associated injuries; 2 underwent splenectomy before transfer to our hospital. All had been diagnosed with splenic injury by CT. The mean age was 11.3 years. The mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (66%), bicycle accidents (26%), and falls (8%). All 50 remaining patients were followed by ultrasound (US) after the initial diagnosis by CT. The mean hospital stay was 6 days. One patient developed the rare complication of an arterio venous (AV) fistula within the damaged spleen; 47 (94%) had normal, homogeneous parenchymal echogenicity at healing (including the patient with the AV fistula). The remaining 3 demonstrated a visible echogenic scar. Imaging documentation of healing blunt splenic trauma should ideally minimize cost and relative risk. Our results add further evidence that US is well-suited to the task. No delayed complications with this approach were recorded in this series.

Analysis of the value of imaging as part of the follow-up of splenic injury in children.

A recent article suggested that routine follow-up imaging is still frequently used in the conservative management of splenic trauma in children. The purpose of this study was to use decision analysis to assess the value of routine imaging as part of the long-term follow-up of splenic injury in children managed nonoperatively. A literature review (1970-1999) on the management of blunt splenic trauma in children was performed. Data, including the use of follow-up imaging and the occurrence of delayed splenic rupture and death, on those patients managed nonoperatively were collected. The data were used to construct a decision tree. A Poisson distribution was used to determine the risk of delayed splenic rupture. Information was extracted from 26 cohort studies. Nineteen of these studies were retrospective and six were prospective. One study had both retrospective and prospective arms. The study population consisted of 1,083 children. Of these patients, 920 (85 %) underwent routine follow-up imaging (US, CT, or scintigraphy). Follow-up imaging was either not performed or selectively performed in 163 patients (15 %). No cases of post-discharge splenic rupture or death were encountered in any of these groups. The maximum risk of delayed splenic rupture in the entire group was 0.3 % (0-3.7 cases). The risk of delayed splenic rupture following blunt injury in children is very low, and is apparently unaffected by imaging protocols. No deaths, even in cases of delayed presentation, were identified in our study. These findings do not support the use of routine follow-up imaging of children with blunt splenic trauma.

Blunt hepatic and splenic trauma in children: correlation of a CT injury severity scale with clinical outcome.

The purpose of this report is to compare a computed tomography (CT) injury severity scale for hepatic and splenic injury with the following outcome measures: requirement for surgical hemostasis, requirement for blood transfusion and late complications. Sixty-nine children with isolated hepatic injury and 53 with isolated splenic injury were prospectively classified at CT according to extent of parenchymal involvement. Clinical records were reviewed to determine clinical outcome. Ninety-seven children (80%) were managed non-operatively without transfusion. One child with hepatic injury required surgical hemostasis, and 17 (25%) required transfusion of blood. Increasing severity of hepatic injury at CT was associated with progressively greater frequency of transfusion (P = 0.002 by chi 2-test). One child with splenic injury underwent surgery and eight (15%) required transfusion of blood. Splenic injury grade at CT did not correlate with frequency (P = 0.41 by chi 2-test) or amount (P = 0.35 by factorial analysis of variance) of transfusion. There was one late complication in the nonsurgical group. A majority of children with hepatic and splenic injury were managed non-operatively without requiring blood transfusion. The severity of injury by CT scan did not correlate with need for surgery. Increasing grade of hepatic injury at CT was associated with increasing frequency of blood transfusion. CT staging was not discriminatory in predicting transfusion requirement in splenic injury.

Decision analysis in children with blunt splenic trauma: The effects of observation, splenorrhaphy, or splenectomy on quality-adjusted life expectancy

The management of blunt splenic trauma in children has remained controversial, with different physicians advocating observation, splenorrhaphy, and splenectomy. Proponents for each position have debated the relative importance of rebleeding (delayed splenic rupture), posttransfusion hepatitis with its sequelae, and overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis. In an attempt to guide the clinician, a decision analysis was performed. Variables evaluated included the incidence of transfusion, postsplenectomy sepsis, posttransfusion hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis, and rebleeding. The quality-adjusted life expectancies (QALEs) when the average incidence of the variables were used in the decision analysis were 62.69 years for observation, 62.32 years for splenorrhaphy, and 61.14 years for splenectomy. Sensitivity analysis showed that there was very little difference between observation and splenorrhaphy when the transfusion rate and hepatitis rate were varied. But these treatment options produced longer QALEs than splenectomy. Therefore, in appropriately selected patients, observation is a safe and effective therapeutic option. If an operation is necessary, every effort should be made to preserve the spleen. Splenectomy may still be required in those cases of complete devascularization, persistent hemorrhage, or other associated significant injuries.

RECURRENT TRAUMATIC SPLENIC RUPTURE TWO YEARS AFTER NON‐OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF SPLENIC TRAUMA

Non-operative and conservative surgical management are now the preferred methods of treatment for blunt splenic trauma in children and adults. These conservative strategies evolved as the risk of late septic complications following splenectomy for trauma became apparent. Although recurrent splenic trauma following conservative management of the ruptured spleen is rare, its surgical management may pose some difficult problems. We present a case in which a second episode of splenic trauma required surgery, two years after the successful non-operative management of the first splenic injury.