Splenic Preservation Research Articles

HPB SO78 - A Novel Application of ISGPS Guidelines for Calculating Pancreatic Fistula Rates Post-Distal Pancreatectomy

Abstract Background Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality following distal pancreatectomy and there is continual debate regarding the optimal peri-operative practice. The impact of drain displacement on outcome is poorly understood and limited information is documented on how the ISGPS guidelines are used to determine a clinically significant POPF. This study aims to assess the POPF and drain displacement rate at our institution and identify factors predicting a clinically significant POPF. We have proposed an algorithm to standardise the interpretation of the ISGPS guidelines. Method Case records of patients undergoing left sided pancreatectomy at our institution from January 2019 to January 2024 were analysed to assess the incidence of biochemical and clinically significant POPF using ISGPS criteria. Post operative CT scans were reviewed to record drain displacement with respect to the pancreatic stump. Continuous data was represented as mean +/- SD or median(IQR) depending on normality. Appropriate statistical tests were used for comparison of continuous and categorical variables (alfa error of 5%). Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to assess the suitability of drain fluid amylase level as a predictor of clinically significant POPF. Results A total of 56 patients qualified for analysis. There was no difference between the clinically insignificant and significant groups with respect to age, gender, BMI, pathology and surgical technique (open/laparoscopic, splenic preservation, stump reinforcement). The clinically significant group had higher day three and peak drain amylase levels. The day of peak drain amylase was significantly later in this group. The drain displacement rate was 41% and did not differ significantly between the two groups. A day 3 drain fluid amylase level of 1120(U/L) had a 74% sensitivity of predicting a clinically significant POPF. Conclusion The ISGPS guidelines do not provide explicit criteria for stratifying the grade of POPF. We propose an algorithm to standardise the interpretation of these guidelines. Drain displacement did not impact POPF rate allowing for small sample size. Day 3 fluid amylase level is a useful predictor of clinically significant POPF. Program permission yes

Splenic Trauma: Concepts and Technique for Interventional Management

AbstractThe spleen is the most commonly involved organ in abdominal trauma, especially in blunt mode of injury. High vascularity and a thin capsule predispose to rapid and fatal bleeding, which could be acute as well as delayed at onset. FAST is usually the first line of investigation required to see for fluid and screen patients suffering abdominal trauma. Triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen further aids in diagnosing and grading splenic trauma as per the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) guidelines. Hemodynamic stability and AAST grade are the main guiding parameters for management. Treatment options include surgical and nonsurgical (endovascular intervention) management. The recent concept of endovascular resuscitation and trauma management, which dwells on creating a hybrid suite, is coming up fast and will play a pivotal role in offering splenic preserving management in trauma cases. In this review article, authors have bought insights about managing splenic trauma as a multidisciplinary concept to achieve splenic preservation and maintain this vital organ's immunological functions.

Laparoscopic surgery: An effective alternative for managing severe blunt splenic injuries in patients who are ineligible for transcatheter arterial embolization

BackgroundTranscatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is an effective alternative to nonoperative management (NOM) to improve the spleen salvage rate for patients with blunt splenic injuries (BSIs), but it is not always available at some institutions. Moreover, laparoscopy has also been used to diagnose and treat trauma, including BSIs. MethodsWe present our 11-year experience in performing laparoscopic surgery for spleen salvage in patients with severe BSIs when TAE is infeasible. The outcomes of laparoscopic surgery or TAE for spleen salvage in hemodynamically stable patients with severe BSIs were compared. ResultsFifty-six patients underwent interventions for severe BSIs during this period. Twenty patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 36 underwent TAE. There were no significant differences in demographics, preoperative conditions, or clinical characteristics (all p > 0.05). In the laparoscopic surgery group, 15 patients (75%) underwent laparoscopic splenorrhaphy for spleen salvage surgery, and five (25%) required splenectomy. No complications requiring intervention were observed in the laparoscopic surgery group, whereas three patients in the TAE group required a late splenectomy for splenic abscess. No significant differences were detected in the splenic preservation rate, complication rate, or length of hospital stay between the groups (all p > 0.05). ConclusionLaparoscopy is feasible and safe for managing hemodynamically stable patients with severe BSIs, and the outcomes are comparable to those of TAE. When TAE is infeasible, laparoscopy can be considered an alternative to increase the spleen salvage rate.

Nationwide cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

BackgroundThis study analyzed the Quality of Life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic (LDP) versus robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP).MethodsConsecutive patients submitted to LDP or RDP from 2010 to 2020 in four high-volume Italian centers were included, with a minimum of 12 months of postoperative follow-up were included. QoL was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D questionnaires, self-reported by patients. After a propensity score matching, which included BMI, gender, operation time, multiorgan and vascular resections, splenic preservation, and pancreatic stump management, the mean differential cost and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) were calculated and plotted on a cost-utility plane.ResultsThe study population consisted of 564 patients. Among these, 271 (49%) patients were submitted to LDP, while 293 (51%) patients to RDP. After propensity score matching, the study population was composed of 159 patients in each group, with a median follow-up of 59 months. As regards the QoL analysis, global health and emotional functioning domains showed better results in the RDP group (p = 0.037 and p = 0.026, respectively), whereas the other did not differ. As expected, the median crude costs analysis confirmed that RDP was more expensive than LDP (16,041 Euros vs. 10,335 Euros, p < 0.001). However, the robotic approach had a higher probability of being more cost-effective than the laparoscopic procedure when a willingness to pay more than 5697 Euros/QALY was accepted.ConclusionRDP was associated with better QoL as explored by specific domains. Crude costs were higher for RDP, and the cost-effectiveness threshold was set at 5697 euros/QALY.

Surgical Repair vs Splenectomy in Patients With Severe Traumatic Spleen Injuries

The spleen is often removed in laparotomy after traumatic abdominal injury, with little effort made to preserve the spleen. To explore the association of surgical management (splenic repair vs splenectomy) with outcomes in patients with traumatic splenic injuries undergoing laparotomy and to determine whether splenic repair is associated with lower mortality compared with splenectomy. This is a trauma registry-based cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from January 2013 to December 2019. Participants included adult patients with severe splenic injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] grades 3-5) undergoing laparotomy after traumatic injury within 6 hours of admission. Data analysis was performed from April to August 2023. Splenic repair vs splenectomy in patients with severe traumatic splenic injury. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were compared using different statistical approaches, including 1:1 exact matching with consecutive conditional logistic regression analysis as the primary analysis and multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and inverse-probability weighting as sensitivity analyses. A total of 11 247 patients (median [IQR] age, 35 [24-52] years; 8179 men [72.7%]) with a severe traumatic splenic injury undergoing laparotomy were identified. Of these, 10 820 patients (96.2%) underwent splenectomy, and 427 (3.8%) underwent splenic repair. Among patients who underwent an initial splenic salvage procedure, 23 (5.3%) required a splenectomy during the subsequent hospital stay; 400 patients with splenic preservation were matched with 400 patients who underwent splenectomy (matched for age, sex, hypotension, trauma mechanism, AIS spleen grade, and AIS groups [0-2, 3, and 4-5] for head, face, neck, thorax, spine, and lower and upper extremity). Mortality was significantly lower in the splenic repair group vs the splenectomy group (26 patients [6.5%] vs 51 patients [12.8%]). The association of splenic repair with lower mortality was subsequently verified by conditional regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; P = .03). Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and inverse-probability weighting confirmed this association. In this retrospective cohort study, splenic repair was independently associated with lower mortality compared with splenectomy during laparotomy after traumatic splenic injury. These findings suggest that efforts to preserve the spleen might be indicated in selected cases of severe splenic injuries.

Management and outcomes of splenic injuries secondary to blunt trauma in patients presenting to major trauma hospitals in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Non-operative management of splenic injuries has significantly increased in the last decade with an increased emphasis on splenic preservation. This shift was assisted by increased availability of angioembolization, however, potential geographical variability in access exists in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). The aim of this study was to assess the management of splenic injury across AoNZ. Five-year retrospective study of all patients admitted to AoNZ hospitals with blunt major trauma and a splenic injury. Patients were identified using the National Trauma Registry and cross-referenced with the National Minimum Data Set to determine their management. The primary outcome was the non-operative rate. Seven hundred seventy-three patients were included. Four hundred sixty-nine presented to a tertiary major trauma hospital and 304 to a secondary major trauma hospital. A difference was found in the rate of non-operative management between tertiary and secondary hospitals (P = 0.019). The rate of non-operative management was similar in mild (P = 0.814) and moderate (P = 0.825) injuries, however, significantly higher in severe injuries in tertiary hospitals (P = 0.009). No difference in mortality rate was found. This study found a difference in the management of splenic injuries between tertiary and secondary major trauma hospitals; predominantly due to a higher rate of operative management in patients with severe injuries at secondary hospitals. Despite this, no difference in mortality rate was found between tertiary and secondary hospitals.

Laparotomy for Traumatic Splenic Injury: Should we Increase our Efforts to Preserve the Spleen?

Abstract Background In trauma laparotomy the spleen is removed very liberally, and often little effort is made for splenic preservation. Aims The aim of this study was to assess the effect of surgical management (splenic repair vs. splenectomy) on outcomes in patients undergoing trauma laparotomy. Methods This is a trauma registry (TQIP) study (2013–2019), including adult patients with severe splenic injuries (grades III-V) undergoing trauma laparotomy. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent splenic repair vs. splenectomy within 6 hours of admission were compared using different statistical approaches, i.e. 1:1 exact matching with consecutive conditional logistic regression analysis as primary analysis, multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching and inverse-probability weighting as sensitivity analyses. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 11,247 patients with a severe splenic injury undergoing trauma laparotomy within 6 hours of admission were identified. Of these, 10,820 (96.2%) patients underwent splenectomy and 427 (3.8%) patients splenic repair within 6 hours of admission. Among patients who underwent an initial splenic salvage procedure, 23 (5.3%) patients underwent a splenectomy during the subsequent hospital stay. 400 patients with splenic preservation, were matched with 400 patients who underwent splenectomy (matched for age, sex, hypotension, trauma mechanism as well as AIS spleen grades 3,4,5 and AIS groups (AIS 0-2, AIS 3, AIS 4-5) for head, face, neck, thorax, spine, and lower &amp; upper extremity). The mortality was significantly lower in the group of patients with splenic repair (6.5% vs 12.8%, p=0.002). The mortality benefit was subsequently verified by conditional regression analysis (aOR 0.4, CI 95% 0.2; 0.9). Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and inverse-probability weighting confirmed the lower mortality in the splenic repair group. Conclusion In trauma laparotomy splenic repair was independently associated with lower mortality compared with splenectomy. Splenectomy was required in approximately 5% of the patients after initial splenic repair. The findings provide evidence that efforts for spleen preservation in trauma laparotomy should be considered in selected cases.

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A propensity score matched multicentric comparative French study

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery has gained momentum for left pancreatic resections. However, debate remains about whether it has any advantage over open surgery for distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. MethodsThis retrospective review examined pancreatectomies performed for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at 21 centers in France between January 2014 and December 2018. Short and long-term outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching based on tumor size, sex, age, body mass index, center, and method of pancreatic transection. ResultsDuring the period study, 274 patients underwent left pancreatic resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [109 underwent distal splenopancreatectomy, and 165 underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy [(splenic vessel preservation (n = 97; 58.7%)/splenic vessel resection (n = 68; 41.3%)]. Before propensity score matching, minimally invasive surgery was associated with a lower rate of major morbidity (P = .004), lower rate of postoperative delayed gastric emptying (P = .04), and higher rate of “textbook” outcomes (P = .04). After propensity score matching, there were 2 groups of 54 patients (n = 30 distal splenopancreatectomy; n = 78 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with less blood loss (P = .05), decreased rate of major morbidity (6% vs. 24%; P = .02), less delayed gastric emptying (P = .05) despite similar rates of postoperative fistula, hemorrhage, and reoperation (P > .05). The 5-year overall survival (79% vs. 75%; P = .74) and recurrence-free survival (10% vs 17%; P = .39) were similar. ConclusionMinimally invasive surgery for left pancreatic resection can be safely proposed for patients with resectable left pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Minimally invasive surgery decreases the rate of major complications while providing comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.

Long-term outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessels preservation or resection: A nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery

BackgroundSpleen preserving distal pancreatectomy is achieved by either splenic vessel resection or splenic vessel preservation. However, the long-term outcomes of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation are not well known. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation. MethodsThe study included a total of 335 patients who underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy during the study period and underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging 3 and 5 years after surgery in the Japan Society of Pancreatic Surgery member institutions. We evaluated the diameter of the perigastric and gastric submucosal veins, patency of the splenic vessels, and splenic infarction. Preoperative backgrounds and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsForty-four (13.1%) and 291 (86.9%) patients underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation, respectively. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between the 2 groups. Regarding long-term outcomes, the prevalence of perigastric varices was higher (P = .006), and platelet count was lower (P = .037) in the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection group. However, other complications, such as gastric submucosal varices, postoperative splenic infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, reoperation, postoperative splenectomy, and other hematologic parameters, were not significantly different between the 2 groups 5 years after surgery. In terms of the patency of splenic vessels in spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation cases, partial or complete occlusion of the splenic artery and vein was observed 5 years after surgery in 19 (6.5%) and 55 (18.9%) patients, respectively. ConclusionPerigastric varices and thrombocytopenia were observed more in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection, yet late clinical events such as gastrointestinal bleeding and splenic infarction are acceptable for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation.

Ex-situ Open Approach Spleen Preserving Splenic Hilum Lymphadenectomy.

Background: multiple studies showed important benefices arising from splenic preservation in patients with digestive cancer in general and gastric cancer in particular. The minimally invasive approach remains controversial in locally advanced gastric cancer cases whilst the open approach still has an important role. This paper's aim is to describe and present the feasibility of an open surgical technique that allows removing stations 10 together with 11p and 11d with spleen and splenic vessels preservation in pacients operated upon by open surgery. Material and Methods: We present an open "Ex-situ" spleen and pancreas preserving surgical technique that removes the anterior and posterior ganglia from the splenic hilum, the splenic vessels and the distal pancreas in locally advanced gastric cancer cases of the upper two thirds of the stomach. Forty-three consecutive patients since 2003 were operated upon by the author in multiple centers. during upper two thirds gastric cancer resections requiring no. 10 lymphadenectomy. Results: no splenectomy was needed . All the spleens were viable at postoperative Doppler echography and CT scans. No spleen migrated nor caused mechanical complications. No clinically significant pancreatic leaks were noticed. Two patients died during hospital stay, one of miocardial infarction and one of massive stroke. Pertinent follow up data and survival were not available. Conclusions: The method enables the surgeon to remove the lymph nodes no. 10 along with 11p and 11d without needing to sacrifice the spleen. All spleens were reattached sucessfully using the preserved spleno-renal ligament fold, no wandering spleen was noticed.

Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with splenic vein preservation

Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with splenic vein preservation

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases.

Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed and compared with regard to short-term outcomes. A total of 62 consecutive LDP cases and 61 RDP cases were performed. There was more conversion to open surgeries in the laparoscopic group compared with the robotic group (21.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001). The LDP group also had a higher rate of postoperative complications (43.5% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major complication or pancreatic fistular after operations (p = 0.20 and p = 0.71, respectively). For planned spleen-preserving operations, the RDP group had a shorter mean operative time (147 min vs. 194 min, p = 0.015) and a reduced total length of hospital stay compared with the LDP group (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.0002). The failure rate for spleen preservation was 0% in RDP and 20% (n = 5/25) in the LDP group (p = 0.009). RDP offered a better method for splenic preservation with Kimura's technique compared with LDP to avoid the risk of splenic infarction and gastric varices related to ligation and division of splenic pedicles. RDP should be the standard operation for the resection of pancreatic tumours at the body and tail of the pancreas without involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery.

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: A novel technique with splenic artery resection and splenic vein preservation.

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSDP) is widely performed to treat benign and low-grade malignant diseases. Although preservation of splenic vessels may be desirable considering the risk of postoperative complications, it is sometimes difficult due to tumor size, inflammation, and proximity of the tumor and splenic vessels. Herein, we present the first case of LSDP with splenic artery resection and splenic vein preservation. A 40-year-old woman with a pancreatic tumor was referred to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a tumor in the pancreatic tail that was in contact with the splenic artery and distant from the splenic vein. The splenic artery and vein were separated from the pancreas near the dissection line. The splenic artery was resected after pancreatic dissection using a linear stapler. After the pancreatic tail was separated from the splenic hilum while preserving the splenic vein, the distal side of the splenic artery was resected, and the specimen was removed. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative Day 9. Four months after surgery, postoperative follow-up CT findings showed neither splenic infarction nor gastric varices. This technique is an alternative method of splenic preservation when there is no attachment of the tumor to the splenic vein or uncontrolled expected bleeding of the splenic artery using the Kimura technique.

Venous reconstruction thrombosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric/portal vein resection due to pancreatic cancer: an 8 years single institution experience

Background Superior mesenteric/portal vein reconstruction (SMPVR) thrombosis remains a challenging complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy concomitant with venous resection. In this context, we aimed to present our SMPVR experiences and identify potential clinicopathological factors that increased SMPVR thrombosis. Methods A total of 33 patients who underwent SMPVR during pancreaticoduodenectomy were analyzed. Of these, 26 patients who experienced pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma met our inclusion criteria. Patients’ data were compared as classified by SMPVR type and the development of SMPVR thrombosis. All interposition grafts were Dacron in this cohort. Results Types of SMPVR included: tangential resection with primary repair (n = 12); segmental resection with splenic vein preservation and either primary anastomosis (n = 8) or 14 mm tubular Dacron grafting (n = 1); segmental resection with splenic vein division either 14 mm tubular Dacron grafting (n = 2) or 14/7 mm ‘Y’–shaped Dacron grafting (n = 3). A total of four patients having 14/7 mm ‘Y’–shaped (n = 3) and 14 mm tubular Dacron (n = 1) developed SMPVR thrombosis (p = .001). Dacron grafting (p = .001) and splenic vein division (p = .010) were associated with SMPVR thrombosis. The median time to detection of SMPVR thrombosis was 4.3 months (2.5–21.0 months). The median follow-up time was 12.2 months (3.0–45 months). Conclusions During pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head ductal carcinoma, extended venous resection requiring SMPVR with ‘Y’–shaped and use of Dacron interposition grafts appeared to be associated with the development of SMPVR thrombosis. This result warrants further investigations.

Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?

BackgroundWhile outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SP-DP) have been widely reported, impacts on splenic parenchyma have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly spleen-related outcomes, by assessing splenic imaging after SP-DP with or without splenic vessels removal.MethodsData for all patients who underwent SP-DP with splenic vessels removal (Warshaw technique, WDP) or preservation (Kimura technique, KDP) between 2010 and 2022 in two tertiary centres were retrospectively analysed. Splenic ischemia and volume at early/late imaging and postoperative outcomes were reviewed.ResultsEighty-seven patients were included, 51 in the WDP and 36 in the KDP groups. Median Charlson’s Comorbidity Index was significantly higher in the WDP group compared with the KDP group. Postoperative morbidity was similar between groups. There was more splenic ischemia at early imaging in the WDP group compared to the KDP group (55% vs. 14%, p = 0.018), especially severe ischemia (23% vs. 0%). Partial splenic atrophy was observed in 29% and 0% in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively (p = 0.002); no complete splenic atrophy was observed. Platelet levels at POD 1, 2 and 6 were significantly higher in the WDP group compared to KDP group. At univariate analysis, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction were prognostic factors for development of splenic atrophy. No episodes of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection or secondary splenectomy were recorded after a median follow-up of 9 and 11 months in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively.ConclusionsSplenic ischemia appeared in one-half of patients undergoing SP-DP with splenic vessels removal at early imaging, and partial splenic atrophy in almost 30% at late imaging, without clinical impact or complete splenic atrophy. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction could help to predict the occurrence of splenic atrophy.

Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy from multi-port to reduced-port surgery approach.

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery via the multi-port approach has become a primary surgical method for distal pancreatectomy (DP) due to its advantages of lower wound pain and superior cosmetic results. Some studies have applied reduced-port techniques for DP in an attempt to enhance cosmetic outcomes due to the minimally invasive effects. Numerous recent review studies have compared multi-port laparoscopic DP (LDP) and multi-port robotic DP (RDP); most of these studies concluded multi-port RDP is more beneficial than multi-port LDP for spleen preservation. However, there have been no comprehensive reviews of the value of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP. To search for and review the studies on spleen preservation and the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive DP that compared reduced-port DP surgery with multi-port DP surgery. The PubMed medical database was searched for articles published between 2013 and 2022. The search terms were implemented using the following Boolean search algorithm: ("distal pancreatectomy" OR "left pancreatectomy" OR "peripheral pancreatic resection") AND ("reduced-port" OR "single-site" OR "single-port" OR "dual-incision" OR "single-incision") AND ("spleen-preserving" OR "spleen preservation" OR "splenic preservation"). A literature review was conducted to identify studies that compared the perioperative outcomes of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP. Fifteen articles published in the period from 2013 to 2022 were retrieved using three groups of search terms. Two studies were added after manually searching the related papers. Finally, 10 papers were selected after removing case reports (n = 3), non-English language papers (n = 1), technique papers (n = 1), reviews (n = 1), and animal studies (n = 1). The common items were defined as items reported in more than five papers, and data on these common items were extracted from all papers. The ten studies included a total of 337 patients (females/males: 231/106) who underwent DP. In total, 166 patients (females/males, 106/60) received multi-port LDP, 126 (females/males, 90/36) received reduced-port LDP, and 45 (females/males, 35/10) received reduced-port RDP. Reduced-port RDP leads to a lower intraoperative blood loss, a lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rate, and shorter hospital stay and follow-up duration, but has a lower spleen preservation rate.

Determinants of splenic preservation among patients with sickle cell disease in North-Eastern Nigeria.

In patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), the spleen commonly enlarges during early childhood, but undergoes reduction in size and fibrosis from repeated episodes of vaso-occlusion and infarction. The rate of progression of this process varies markedly among these patients. The aim of current study was to explore clinical and laboratory factors associated with the preservation of the spleen among these patients. Two hundred four patients with SCD (103 females; age 1-45 years) underwent abdominal ultrasonography at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria between October 2020 and November 2021 to assess for splenic visualisation and echotexture. Steady-state clinical parameters and blood samples for full blood count, serum chemistry, high-performance liquid chromatography and malaria parasitemia were obtained from all the patients. The spleen was visualised in 107 (52.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-59%) patients with SCD on ultrasonography. While the spleen was visualised in all children less than 5 years of age, it was visualised in only 23.5% of those aged 15 years and older. Visualisation of the spleen was significantly associated with low mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration and high haemoglobin F (HbF) in those younger than 10 years. The odds of visualisation of the spleen on ultrasonography increased by a factor of 1.17% for every 1% increase in HbF level. Only 32 (15%) patients were on regular hydroxyurea therapy. The HbF level was significantly higher among patients on hydroxyurea (median 12.7 vs. 7.4; p < 0.0001). In patients with SCD, failure to visualise the spleen was not found in children less than 5 years old. Patients with visualised spleens had a higher level of HbF than those with non-visualised spleens. HbF was significantly associated with visualisation of the spleen before 10 years of age. Since early administration of hydroxyurea will increase HbF level, we expect that it would help to preserve the spleen.

“Parenchyma transection-first” strategy is superior to “tunnel-first” strategy in robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels

BackgroundCreating a tunnel between the pancreas and splenic vessels followed by pancreatic parenchyma transection (“tunnel-first” strategy) has long been used in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) with splenic vessel preservation (Kimura's procedure). However, the operation space is limited in the tunnel, leading to the risks of bleeding and difficulties in suturing. We adopted the pancreatic “parenchyma transection-first” strategy to optimize Kimura's procedure. MethodsThe clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent robotic SPDP with Kimura's procedure between January 2017 and September 2022 at our center were retrieved. The cohort was classified into a “parenchyma transection-first” strategy (P-F) group and a “tunnel-first” strategy (T-F) group and analyzed. ResultsA total of 91 patients were enrolled in this cohort, with 49 in the T-F group and 42 in the P-F group. Compared with the T-F group, the P-F group had significantly shorter operative time (146.1 ± 39.2 min vs. 174.9 ± 46.6 min, P < 0.01) and lower estimated blood loss [40.0 (20.0–55.0) mL vs. 50.0 (20.0–100.0) mL, P = 0.03]. Failure of splenic vessel preservation occurred in 10.2% patients in the T-F group and 2.4% in the P-F group (P = 0.14). The grade 3/4 complications were similar between the two groups (P = 0.57). No differences in postoperative pancreatic fistula, abdominal infection or hemorrhage were observed between the two groups. ConclusionsThe pancreatic “parenchyma transection-first” strategy is safe and feasible compared with traditional “tunnel-first strategy” in SPDP with Kimura's procedure.

The clinical difference and CT finding of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy according to spleen and splenic vessel preservation

The clinical difference and CT finding of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy according to spleen and splenic vessel preservation

A rare case of wandering spleen with its unreported associations: case report and literature review

Wandering spleen (WS) is a rare clinical entity with unclear clinical picture. Patient can be asymptomatic or can present with acute abdomen, based on the degree of associated splenic torsion, but most of the cases needed an emergency splenectomy. We herein report an unusual presentation of a wandering spleen in the elderly with thrombocytosis, portal, and splenic vein thrombosis, and sinistral hypertension. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report documenting all these associations altogether. This case report describes how this challenging case was managed well. Splenectomy was inevitable in this patient as the spleen was infarcted. This enlightens the need for timely diagnosis and intervention of wandering spleen for splenic preservation.