Spine Neurosurgeons Research Articles

Variation of practice in the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Section study.

The incidence of spondylodiscitis is rising across Europe, but the ideal treatment approach remains controversial. The choice between conservative and surgical therapies is ambiguous due to a lack of consensus. This European survey aimed to explore prevailing treatment paradigms for primary spondylodiscitis. Spine neurosurgeons were invited through the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Section's mailing list to participate in an online survey featuring 7 spondylodiscitis case vignettes. Along with general management queries, specific patient treatment questions were posed. Data analysis was performed using R software (version 4.0.4). The index of qualitative variation (IQV) was calculated to quantify the variability in responses. A total of 130 responses were collected, comprising 86.9% board-certified neurosurgeons and 13.1% neurosurgeons in training, with an average of 11 years of practice. Most respondents performed 50-100 spine surgeries annually, with 66.7% specializing in spine surgery. An epidural empyema causing pronounced neurological deficits influenced 95.4% toward a surgical intervention, and mild neurological deficits and challenges in pathogen identification prompted 72.3% and 80%, respectively, to consider a surgical approach. Vertebral body destruction and spinal deformity directed 60% and 66.2%, respectively, toward surgery, whereas advanced age and comorbidities had a much smaller impact-5.4% and 9.2%, respectively. Clinical vignettes highlighted a predominant preference for conservative treatment in specific cases, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The IQV values evaluated for each question ranged from 0.88 to 0.99, indicating low agreement across all questions among respondents. When examining the average IQV by country, intercountry variations in IQV were substantial, as illustrated by the diverse range of overall mean IQV values (0.15-0.85). The findings reveal a significant variability in the treatment of spondylodiscitis among European neurosurgeons, with most neurosurgeons opting for conservative treatment. These diverse strategies, both between and within countries, highlight an imperative for evidence-backed guidelines and consensus statements for this grave condition.

Accuracy of imaging grading in comparison to open laminectomy to evaluate pedicle screws positioning.

Prospective experimental study. To compare the accuracy of O-Arm-acquired radiographic and computed tomography (CT) evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement with open laminectomy in a simulation laboratory. Improving surgical safety and procedural efficiency during thoracic posterior spine instrumentation is essential for decreasing complication rates and possible related risks. The most common way of verifying the position of pedicle screws during the surgical procedure and immediately postoperatively is to acquire intraoperative fluoroscopic images and plain radiographs of the spine, respectively. Laboratory simulated surgery is a valuable tool to evaluate the accuracy of those exams. Twenty simulation models of scoliosis from T3 to T7 were instrumented by five spine fellows (total of 200 pedicle screws), followed by radiographic and CT images acquired with the assistance of the O-Arm which were evaluated by three independent raters. A fellowship-trained spine neurosurgeon performed laminectomies on the instrumented levels and assessed pedicle integrity (gold standard). Forty-eight breaches were identified in the axial direct view after laminectomy. Of those, eighteen breaches were classified as unacceptable. Regarding the sagittal direct view, four breaches were observed, three of which were classified as unacceptable. Overall, both O-arm radiographic and CT evaluations had a significantly high negative predicted value but a low positive predicted value to identify unacceptable breaches, especially in the sagittal plane. The frequency of missed breaches by all three examiners was high, particularly in the sagittal plane. Postoperative evaluation of pedicle screws using O-arm-acquired radiographic or CT images may underdiagnose the presence of breaches. In our study, sagittal breaches were more difficult to diagnose than axial breaches. Although most breaches do not have clinical repercussions, this study suggests that this modality of postoperative radiographic assessment may be inaccurate. 4.

Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms among neurosurgical spine surgeons

BackgroundNeurosurgeons, particularly spine surgeons, have high exposure to vibrations via electric or pneumatic drills and repetitive motion. Although no data exist for the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) among these surgeons, anecdotal evidence suggests the rate of symptoms is higher than in the general population. MethodsAn anonymous questionnaire was developed to assess demographics, practice patterns, presence of CTS symptoms, and treatment (time off, bracing, medication, injections, surgery). The survey was sent via anonymous email link to members of the AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerve. Results101 members responded: 44 reported at least one symptom related to CTS (43.6%). There was no statistically significant relationship between overall or spine case volume, the number of cases performed annually/daily, and CTS symptoms. Respondents working in non-teaching settings were significantly more likely to have CTS symptoms than academic teaching institutions (50.0% v. 45.0%; p = 0.0112). ConclusionsOur survey demonstrated CTS to be more prevalent in spine neurosurgeons (43.6%) than in the general population (1–5%). The lack of significant association between most practice-based metrics and CTS symptoms may indicate that respondents have a minimum case volume that exceeds the amount of vibration exposure/repetitive motion to develop symptoms. The significantly increased prevalence of CTS among neurosurgeons at non-teaching institutions suggests that residents provide operative assistance offsetting the vibration exposure/repetitive motion by attendings. Further research may determine the root cause for the high prevalence of CTS in spine neurosurgeons and devise methods for reducing vibration exposure.

Learning Curves for Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: Analysis of Operative Time for 234 Cases.

Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is associated with greater accuracy, reduced radiation, less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications than freehand screw placement. However, it can be associated with longer operative times and an extended training period. We report the initial experience of a surgeon using a robot system at an academic medical center. We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing robot-assisted pedicle screw placement at a single tertiary care institution by 1 surgeon from 10/2017 to 05/2022. Linear regression, analysis of variance, and cumulative sum analysis were used to evaluate operative time learning curves. Operative time subanalyses for surgery indication, number of levels, and experience level were performed. In total, 234 cases were analyzed. A significant 0.19-minute decrease in operative time per case was observed (r = 0.14, P = .03). After 234 operations, this translates to a reduction in 44.5 minutes from the first to last case. A linear relationship was observed between case number and operative time in patients with spondylolisthesis (-0.63 minutes/case, r = 0.41, P < .001), 2-level involvement (-0.35 minutes/case, r = 0.19, P = .05), and 4-or-more-level involvement (-1.29 minutes/case, r = 0.24, P = .05). This resulted in reductions in operative time ranging from 39 minutes to 1.5 hours. Continued reductions in operative time were observed across the learning, experienced, and expert phases, which had mean operative times of 214, 197, and 146 minutes, respectively ( P < .001). General proficiency in robot-assisted surgery was observed after the 20th case. However, 67 cases were required to reach mastery, defined as the inflection point of the cumulative sum curve. This study documents the long-term learning curve of a fellowship-trained spine neurosurgeon. Operative time significantly decreased with more experience. Although gaining comfort with robotic systems may be challenging or require additional training, it can benefit surgeons and patients alike with continued reductions in operative time.

Geographic Distribution in Training and Practice of Academic Neurological and Orthopedic Spine Surgeons in the United States

Cross-sectional study. This study aimed to stratify the geographic distribution of academic spine surgeons in the United States, analyzing how this distribution highlights differences in academic, demographic, professional metrics, and gaps in access to spine care. Spine surgeons were identified using American Association of Neurological Surgeons and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons databases, categorizing into geographic regions of training and practice. Departmental websites, National Institutes of Health (NIH) RePort Expenditures and Results, Google Patent, and NIH icite databases were queried for demographic and professional metrics. Academic spine surgeons (347 neurological; 314 orthopedic) are predominantly male (95%) and few have patents (23%) or NIH funding (4%). Regionally, the Northeast has the highest proportion per capita (3.28 surgeons per million), but California is the state with the highest proportion (13%). The Northeast has the greatest regional retention post-residency at 74%, followed by the Midwest (59%). The West and South are more associated with additional degrees. Neurosurgery-trained surgeons hold more additional degrees (17%) than orthopedic surgeons (8%), whereas more orthopedic surgeons hold leadership positions (34%) than neurosurgeons (20%). Academic spine surgeons are found at the highest proportion in the Northeast and California; the Northeast has the greatest regional retention. Spine neurosurgeons have more additional degrees, whereas spine orthopedic surgeons have more leadership positions. These results are relevant to training programs looking to correct geographic disparities, surgeons in search of training programs, or students in pursuit of spine surgery.

Factors Affecting the Choice of Neurosurgery Subspecialty: A Geographic and Gender-Wise Analysis

To understand the factors that affect decision-making when choosing a specific subspecialty while exploring gender and geographic variables. A cross-sectional, 13-item, nonrandomized online survey was created and shared over various social media platforms of the Neurosurgery Cocktail. Data were collected between January and April 2022. The survey focused on the amount of exposure to subspecialties during training, along with factors affecting the decision in choosing a specific subspecialty. A total of 207 respondents, predominantly from Asian and European countries, with an 83.6% dominance of male respondents, completed the survey. The most common subspecialties with maximum exposure were neurosurgical oncology, spine, and neurocritical care and trauma, whereas peripheral nerve surgery and stereotactic and functional neurosurgery were the least exposed. In total, 70% of the respondents had no training or degree in a subspecialty, which was the greatest in Asian and African countries (P= 0.0205). Respondents found the prestige and lifestyle of a skull base neurosurgeon very attractive (P=0.027, 0.034 respectively), whereas the lifestyle and salary of spine neurosurgeons made it a popular subspecialty (P < 0.001, 0.008, respectively). Personal interest in neurosurgical oncology established its popularity among the respondents (P= 0.028). Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery and peripheral nerve surgery are the emerging subspecialties and hence their exposure and access are highly limited to the developed world whereas spine and neurosurgical oncology branches had a homogenous geographic presence. Pediatric neurosurgery had the most female representation, thereby necessitating the need to uplift women in other subspecialties.

Subspecialty and Training Preferences for U.S. Neurosurgery Faculty with International Training

Academic neurosurgeons with international medical training play a large role in the U.S. neurosurgical workforce. We aimed to compare U.S.-trained neurosurgeons with internationally trained neurosurgeons to reveal differences in subspecialty preferences and training opportunities abroad. We identified 1671 neurosurgeons from 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited neurosurgical residency programs. Data on demographics, institution characteristics, and chosen subspecialty were collected, and faculty were divided based on location of training. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression compared faculty characteristics between training locations. Compared with the U.S. medical school+ U.S. residency group, the international medical graduate+ U.S. residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base and vascular neurosurgery and complete a fellowship in the United States or internationally (P < 0.05). The international medical graduate+ international residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base neurosurgery, more likely to complete an international fellowship, and less likely to practice general neurosurgery (P < 0.05). Neurosurgeons in pediatrics, radiosurgery, and vascular subspecialties were more likely to receive fellowship training in any location (P<0.05). Additionally, functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete fellowships internationally, spinal neurosurgeons were less likely to pursue international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons were more likely to have dual fellowship training in both the United States and abroad (P < 0.05). International medical training affected subspecialty choice and fellowship training. Internationally trained neurosurgeons more often specialized in oncology and vascular neurosurgery. Functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete international fellowships, spine neurosurgeons were less likely to complete international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons more often had both U.S. and international fellowships.

Patient satisfaction reviews for 967 spine neurosurgeons on Healthgrades.

Patients are increasingly relying on independent physician rating websites (PRWs) to obtain information about healthcare providers. Healthgrades.com is a widely used PRW that allows patients to rate physicians on various metrics of performance and quality of care. This study categorically investigated the correlations between demographics of spine neurosurgeons and online ratings on Healthgrades to better understand the factors driving patient satisfaction in spine surgery in the United States. In August-December 2019, the authors performed a retrospective data analysis using Healthgrades. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) membership database was used to identify spine neurosurgeons in the United States and extract biographical and career data. Individuals with an academic practice were further investigated for academic rank, leadership, and fellowship training. Scores from eight patient satisfaction metrics (PSMs) were collected for each surgeon from Healthgrades. A total of 967 spine neurosurgeons were included in the study cohort. Patient satisfaction did not correlate with sex, PhD acquisition, academic status, or academic rank. Among those who were academic surgeons, completion of fellowship training was associated with higher ratings. Geographical location of practice did not influence patient satisfaction. Prolonged wait time was an independent predictor of decreased patient satisfaction and was a key confounding variable underlying trends seen with advanced career duration and age. Overall, patients rated spine neurosurgeons highly favorably on the Healthgrades website. Due to the emerging role of PRWs in locating and assessing providers, it is important for both patients and clinicians to understand the factors that impact patient experience.

105 Patient Satisfaction Reviews for 967 Spine Neurosurgeons

INTRODUCTION: Patients are increasingly relying on independent physician-rating websites (PRWs) to obtain information about healthcare providers. Healthgrades.com is a widely used PRW which allows patients to rate physicians on various metrics of performance and quality-of-care. METHODS: This study categorically investigated the correlations between demographics of spine neurosurgeons and online ratings on Healthgrades to better understand the factors driving patient satisfaction in spine surgery in the United States. RESULTS: A total of 967 spine neurosurgeons were included in the study cohort. Patient satisfaction did not correlate with gender, Ph.D. acquisition, academic status, or academic rank. Among those who were academic surgeons, completion of fellowship training was associated with higher ratings. Geographical location of practice did not influence patient satisfaction. Prolonged wait time was an independent predictor of decreased patient satisfaction and was a key confounding variable underlying trends seen with advanced career duration and age. CONCLUSION: Overall, patients rated spine neurosurgeons highly favorably on Healthgrades.com. Due to the emerging role of PRWs in locating and assessing providers, it is important for both patients and clinicians to understand the factors that impact patient experience.

Trends in Academic Spine Neurosurgeon Productivity as Measured by the Relative Citation Ratio

Publication metrics such as the author-level h-index are often used to evaluate and compare research productivity in academia. The h-index, however, is not a field-normalized statistic and has been criticized as inappropriate for comparison of authors from different fields. For example, fields such as internal medicine have a larger audience and thus afford publications a higher likelihood of increased citations compared with a perhaps equally impactful paper in a smaller field such as neurosurgery. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a new field-normalized article-level metric called the relative citation ratio (RCR) that can be used to more accurately compare author productivity between fields. Spine represents a distinct subset of neurosurgery with a designated fellowship and distinct differences in the RCR metrics. The authors look to analyze the unique results found in the academic spine neurosurgeon RCR values compared with all academic neurosurgeons. The assessment of academic physicians should use field-independent publication metrics to measure the improvement of grant outcomes, promotion, and continued evaluation of research productivity. Here, we provide an analysis of RCR indices for 358 academic spine neurosurgeons in the United States, including the mean RCR of each author's total publications and the weighted RCR, which is the sum of all publication-level RCR values of an author. We further assess the impact of gender, career duration, academic rank, and Ph.D. acquisition on the RCR scores of U.S. academic spine neurosurgeons. The mean RCR is the total citations per year of a publication divided by average citations per year received by NIH-funded papers in the same field. A value of 1 is the normal NIH-funded standard. iCite database searches were performed for all physician faculty members affiliated with accredited neurological surgery programs who have subspecialized in spine as of November 1, 2019. Gender, career duration, academic rank, additional degrees, total publications, mean RCR, and weighted RCR were collected for each individual. RCR and weighted RCR were compared between variables to assess patterns of analysis. A total of 358 fellowship-trained academic spine neurosurgeons from 125 institutions were included in the analysis. Exceptional research productivity was noted, with a median RCR of 1.38 (interquartile range= 0.94-1.95) and a weighted median RCR of 25.28 (interquartile range= 6.87-79.93). Overall, gender and academic rank were associated with increased mean RCR and weighted RCR values. Career duration and Ph.D. acquisition were not. All subgroups analyzed had an RCR value above 1.0, with professor-level faculty or department chair having the highest mean and weighted RCR values overall. Current academic spine neurosurgeons have high median RCR values relative to the NIH standard RCR value of 1.0. Relative to the field of neurological surgery overall, RCR values for the spine subspecialty are comparable. These data offer a more accurate means for self-evaluation of academic neurosurgeons as well as evaluation of faculty by institutional and departmental leaders.

Lumbar Discectomy. Why Romanian Spine Surgeons and Neurosurgeons Need a Paradigm Shift?

Low back pain and its management can be briefly summarized as an entire industry per se. As the general age of the population increases more and more patients fi nd themselves hospitalized with degenerative disorders of the spine which might not always mandate surgery. This article wishes to illustrate the negative tendencies regarding the increasing number of patients frequently receiving ill-advised surgery for low back pain and the consequences that further implicate the healthcare system and the economy. At the same time the authors wish to highlight the need for a national database of patients operated for spine disease and discuss a few key-items spine surgeons and neurosurgeons need to consider prior to operating patients with degenerative diseases of the spine.

Enhanced recovery after spine surgery-a multinational survey assessing surgeons' perspectives.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is the object of numerous publications in various surgical fields. Still, its value in spine surgery is not as recognized as it is in other surgical domains. Our aim was to report neurosurgeons' opinions about ERAS in spine surgery. From December 2019 to January 2020, members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies were asked to complete an online questionnaire regarding ERAS in spine surgery. N = 234 participants responded to the survey (60% spine neurosurgeons; 22.6% working in private practice). Thirty-two percent reported to have more than 20years of experience, followed by surgeons having between 5 and 10 (27.4%), 10-15 (17.9%), 15-20 (12%), and 0-5years (10.7%). Gender distribution (12% vs 27% female gender, p = 0.04), private practice activity (28% vs 14%, p = 0.01), familiarity with the ERAS concept (57.4% vs 27%, p < 0.0001), and its implementation in the daily clinical practice (47.5% vs 18.3%, p < 0.0001) were statistically different between spine and general neurosurgeons. 54.7% of the surgeons were unfamiliar with ERAS in spine surgery. 63.7% considered ERAS as a progress; 36% declared to implement ERAS in their daily clinical practice. 1.7% reported ERAS as a decrease in the quality of management. 6.8% considered ERAS as not having an impact on patient care; 27.8% had no opinion. There were no differences in opinion on ERAS and its implementation between surgeons working in private and public hospitals. 69.5% of the spine surgeons considered ERAS having a positive impact on patient management, versus 55% of non-spine surgeons (p = 0.02). Efforts are necessary to promote minimal invasive pre-, intra-, and postoperative workflow to improve patient management and reduce complications or side effects particularly adapted to spinal surgery. Specificities of spine patients, in terms of chronic pain, pre- and postoperative pain management, and psychological issues have to be considered.

Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice-a qualitative study.

BackgroundThe judicialization of medicine can lead to professional disenchantment and defensive attitudes among surgeons. Some quantitative studies have investigated this topic in spine surgery, but none has provided direct thematic feedback from physicians. This qualitative study aimed to identify the impact of this phenomenon in the practice of spine neurosurgeons.MethodsWe proposed a qualitative study using grounded theory approach. Twenty-three purposively selected private neurosurgeons participated. Inclusion took place until data saturation was reached. Data were collected through individual interviews and analyzed thematically and independently by three researchers (an anthropologist, a psychiatrist, and a neurosurgeon).ResultsData analysis identified five superordinate themes that were based on items that recurred in interviews: (1) private practice of spinal surgery (high-risk surgery based on frequent functional symptoms, in an unfavorable medicolegal context); (2) societal transformation of the doctor-patient relationship (new societal demands, impact of the internet and social network); (3) judicialization of spine surgery (surgeons’ feelings about the frequency and motivation of the complaints they receive, and their own management of them); (4) coping strategies (identification and solutions for “at risk” situations and patients); and (5) professional disenchantment (impact of these events on surgeons’ daily practice and career planning). Selected quotes of interviews were reported to support these findings.ConclusionsOur study highlights several elements that can alter the quality of care in a context of societal change and the judicialization of medicine. The alteration of the doctor-patient relationship and the permanent pressure of a possible complaint encourage surgeons to adopt defensive attitudes in order to minimize the risks of litigation and increased insurance premiums. These phenomena can affect the quality of care and the privacy of physicians to the extent that they may consider changing or interrupting their careers earlier.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04302-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Spinal problems – Spine surgeon or neurosurgeon: Is it an issue?

Spinal problems – Spine surgeon or neurosurgeon: Is it an issue?

A Case of Scheuermann’s Disease Co-Occurrence with Idiopathic Scoliosis and Intradural-Extramedullary Epidermoid Cyst: The First Case Report in Literature

Background and importance: Scheuermann’s disease (SD), intradural-extramedullary epidermoid cysts and idiopathic scoliosis (IS) are all rare conditions. The co-occurrence of the three condition on one case has not been reported in literature before. We describe an extremely rare case of SD co-occurrence with IS and intradural-extramedullary epidermoid cyst, which is the first in the literature. Clinical presentation: A 13-year old boy and his parents presented at Honghui Hospital complaining of progressive hyperkyphosis for 5 years and back pain for 2 months. Thorough medical examination and radiology confirmed the diagnosis of SD kyphosis, IS, and intradural-extramedullary epidermoid cyst. Medical panel with spine surgeons, oncologists, neurosurgeons, histopathologists and radiologists were consulted. Tumor excise, kyphosis recorrection and spine reconstruction surgery was conducted. Postoperative histological examination detected desquamation of keratin from the epithelial lining and stratified squamous epithelium without skin adnexa. The boy was ambulant 2 days postoperative with walking aids. Conclusion: This is the first case report of Scheuermann’s disease (SD) co-occurrence with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and intradural-extramedullary epidermoid cyst. The co-occurrence of intradural epidermoid cyst, SD and IS might not be a coincidence, indicating a kind of genetic etiology need to be illuminated.

Neuralgic Amyotrophy: Clinical and Epidemiological Features From a Spine Neurosurgeon's Perspective

Abstract INTRODUCTION Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is a rare but serious condition characterized by the acute onset of shoulder and arm pain, weakness, and sensory loss. NA may therefore be misdiagnosed as a cervical spine disease, or as a shoulder disorder. With little literature on the behavior of NA from a spine surgeon's perspective, accurate diagnosis and subsequent counseling of patients with NA can be challenging. METHODS Data were collected from 30 patients during an 11-yr period. Neurophysiologic studies were performed in all patients. A total of 19 patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) using a 1.5-T or 3.0-T scanner. RESULTS A total of 30 patients were diagnosed with NA based on positive neurophysiologic findings. The most common clinical presentation was severe shoulder pain and weakness in 22 patients (73%). A total of 15 patients (50%) were misdiagnosed with cervical disc herniations (12 patients), a pancoast syndrome (1 patient), a cubital tunnel syndrome (1 patient), and a posterior interosseous syndrome (1 patient). In neurophysiologic studies, the most commonly involved trunk of the brachial plexus was the upper trunk in 24 patients. MRN was taken at the acute phase in all patients and showed a thickened and hyperintense trunk of the affected brachial plexus, consistent with plexitis. The prognosis was good with a functional recovery (of up to 80%) in 28 patients (93%) at final follow-up period. Among them, however, 6 patients still had mild weakness (Grade IV). Two patients did not achieve their functional motor recovery (Grade 3) at 18 mo after onset. CONCLUSION Because NA is misdiagnosed in many cases, awareness and accurate diagnosis of this disorder can help neurosurgeons determine the most appropriate treatment. To prevent unnecessary surgical procedures or studies, it is important to distinguish NA from other alternative diseases. Neurophysiologic studies are critical for diagnosis of NA, and MRN is very helpful for early diagnosis.

Limitations of patient experience reports to evaluate physician quality in spine surgery: analysis of 7485 surveys.

The Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) is a standardized patient experience survey that is used to evaluate the quality of care delivered by physicians. The authors sought to determine which factors influenced CG-CAHPS scores for spine surgery, and compare them to their cranial-focused cohorts. A retrospective study of prospectively obtained data was performed to evaluate CG-CAHPS scores. Between May 2013 and May 2017, all patients 18 years of age or older with an outpatient encounter with a neurosurgeon (5 spine-focused neurosurgeons and 20 cranial-focused neurosurgeons) received a CG-CAHPS survey. Three domains were assessed: overall physician rating, likelihood to recommend, and physician communication. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests. Seven thousand four hundred eighty-five patient surveys (2319 spine and 5166 cranial) were collected from patients presenting to the outpatient offices of an attending neurosurgeon. Analysis of the overall physician rating showed that 81.1% of spine neurosurgeons received a "top-box" score (answers of "yes, definitely"), whereas 86.2% of cranial neurosurgeons received a top-box response (p < 0.001). A similar difference was observed with the domains of "likelihood to recommend" and "physician communication." Overall physician rating was also significantly influenced by the general and mental health of the patients surveyed (p < 0.001). For spine surgeons seeing patients at more than one facility, the scores with respect to location were also significantly different in all domains for each individual provider (p < 0.001). Overall, spine-focused neurosurgeon ratings differed significantly from those of cranial-focused neurosurgical subspecialty providers. Office location also affected provider ratings for spine neurosurgeons. These results suggest that physician ratings obtained via patient experience surveys may be representative of factors aside from just the quality of physician care provided. This information should be considered as payers, government, and health systems design performance programs based on patient experience scores.

Spinal cord issues in adult patients with MPS: transition of care survey.

This study aims to raise awareness of the need for research and appropriate guidelines for managing spinal cord issues in adult patients with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) and transition of these patients from pediatric to adult care. Pediatric/adult neurosurgeons, orthopedic spine surgeons, and treating physicians with expertise in metabolic disorders and spinal cord issues were invited to complete a survey to assess their experience with spinal cord problems in MPS and their opinion on transitioning routes from pediatric to adult care. Twenty specialists completed the survey; 16 had treated spinal cord issues in patients with MPS. Foramen magnum and cervical stenosis (87%), atlanto-axial instability (67%), and lumbar spine instability (33%) were the main spinal cord issues encountered; 28% had treated adult patients for one or more spinal cord issues. In 40% of cases, this concerned an intervention or procedures performed during childhood. The main specialist responsible for the care of adult patients with MPS differed considerably between institutions and included both pediatric and adult specialists (30% pediatric neurosurgeons, 10% pediatric spine orthopedic surgeons, 30% adult spine neurosurgeons, 20% general adult surgeons). The preferred option (> 50%) for the transition of care was an interdisciplinary team of pediatric and adult specialists. Further work needs to be done to address problems of managing spinal cord issues in adult patients with MPS. Currently, the responsibility for the care of patients with MPS with spinal cord issues is inconsistent. The best strategy for transitioning these patients from pediatric to adult care is likely an interdisciplinary approach.

A study of presence of accessory foramina transversaria in dry human cervical vertebrae of South Indian origin

Background: The unique feature of cervical vertebrae is the presence of foramen bilaterally in their transverse processes called foramen transversarium (FT). Vertebral artery, vertebral vein, and sympathetic nerve pass through it. Normally, there is one FT on either side. Occasionally, it is either absent or duplicated unilaterally or bilaterally. Thorough anatomical knowledge about such variations is essential for surgeons and clinicians. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to find out the incidence of accessory foramen transversarium (AFT) in the cervical vertebrae. Materials and Methods: The present work was carried out on 100 dry cervical (including both typical and atypical) vertebrae of unknown age and sex. All the vertebrae were macroscopically examined for the presence of AFT. Vertebrae having AFT unilaterally or bilaterally were separated and photographed. Data compiled and analyzed. Results: The incidence of AFT was 20% in the cervical vertebrae including both typical and atypical vertebrae. The presence of AFT was more common in typical cervical vertebrae as compared to atypical vertebrae. Unilateral AFT was more commonly seen. In the present study, atypical cervical vertebrae, namely C1 and C2, have not shown AFT at all. Conclusions: Anatomical knowledge of such variations is helpful for spine surgeons, clinicians, radiologists, and neurosurgeons, for better pre-operative planning and treatment.

Comparative study of perioperative complication rates of cervical laminoplasty performed by residents and teaching neurosurgeons

Early surgical education is required for neurosurgical residents to learn many surgical procedures. However, the participation of less experienced residents may increase perioperative complication rates. Perioperative complication studies in the field of neurosurgery are being increasingly published; however, studies have not yet focused on cervical laminoplasty. The study population included 193 consecutive patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty in Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital between 2008 and 2014. Patient and surgeon background factors, as well as perioperative complication rates were retrospectively compared between resident and board-certified spine neurosurgeon groups. Deteriorated or newly developed neurological deficits and surgical site complications within 30days of cervical laminoplasty were defined as perioperative complications. Out of 193 patients, 123 (64%) were operated on by residents as the first operator and 70 (36%) by board-certified spine neurosurgeons. No significant differences were observed in patient and surgeon factors between the two groups, except for hyperlipidemia (13 vs 17, p=0.02). Furthermore, no significant differences were noted in perioperative complication rates between the two groups (7 [5.7%] vs 4 [5.7%], p=1). Cervical laminoplasty performed in a standardized manner by residents who received their surgical training in our hospital did not increase perioperative complication rates, and ensured the safety of patients.