Spinal Stabilization Surgery Research Articles

Time to Surgery for Subaxial Cervical Fractures: A Multicenter Study

ObjectiveTo identify delays for surgery to stabilize subaxial cervical fractures and the main reasons for them across Latin America. MethodsThis is a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients surgically treated for subaxial cervical fractures from 13 spine centers across Latin America from January 1th 2014 to January 1th 2023. Causes of delay to surgery beyond 24 hours were documented. ResultsWe included 529 patients from 13 institutions in Latin American countries; 408 (77,1%) males and 121 (22,9%) females with a mean age of 43,4 (SD=±16,2). Predominantly caused by traffic accident (n=256; 48,4%), followed by fall from height (n=233; 44%). Mostly, suffered type C fractures (n=348; 65.8%) and/or neurological injury (n=384; 72,6%). The time from admission to surgery was >72 hours in 70% of the patients included (n=375; 70,9%). More than 45% waited longer than a week (n=257; 48,6%) for spine surgery. Only 12,5% (n=66) of the patients received surgery in the first 24 hours from admission. The primary reasons for the surgical delay were the necessity for other surgical procedures (n=161; 34,8%), the unavailability of surgical implants (n=60; 13,0%), patient clinical instability (n=55;11,9%), and delays in referral (n=38; 8,2%). ConclusionsWe documented significant and concerning delays in providing spinal decompression and stabilization surgery to patients with cervical spine fractures. Only 17% of patients have surgery in the recommended time <24 hrs., more than half of the patients must wait for more than 72 hours, and nearly half of patients wait for longer than a week.

Impact of Gender-Specific Physiological activities on Bone Density and Spinal Alignment Post-Spinal Stabilization Surgery Affecting Quality of Life

Background: The rate of spinal stabilization surgery has increased in recent years among both males and females due to ineffective activities impacting their quality of life, work-disability, and social-disability. Aim: This study aimed to determine the impact of such activities on bone density and spinal alignment after spinal stabilization surgery within the context of Bursa, Turkey. Method: A sample of 450 patients, who had undergone spinal surgery, was included, 210 of which were females and 240 were males. These patients had suffered from different ailments including spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis and disc herniation. In order to attain the required outcomes, Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) was measured before and after (one year) operation. This test measured various positive and negative outcomes post-spinal stabilization surgery including improvement in degree of pain and back function, quality of life, degree of work-disability and social-disability, over a period of 12-months. Patients' satisfaction level with therapy was also measured using a 5-point Likert scale while parametric statistics provided the relationship among variables. Results: The results obtained show that females with all pathologies had worse COMI scores significantly (p &lt; 0.05) as compared to males. However, no significant differences were observed after the operation within the context of gender (p &gt; 0.05). However, 72% of females and 71% of males received minimal clinically important change (MCIC) score of 2.2 for COMI. Hence, gender showed insignificant relationship with MCIC, since females did not show any significant satisfaction level as compared to males concerning their post-operative health outcomes. Conclusion: The study recommends to emphasize on improving therapeutic and surgical measures aiming at attaining significant satisfaction levels after surgery.

Outcomes of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Treated With Open Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Posterior Spinal Stabilization: A Retrospective Study at a Rural Teaching Hospital in South India.

Background Thoracolumbar spine fractures are the most prevalent type of axial skeleton fractures, with approximately two-thirds occurring between T11 and L2. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation has been reported to be an effective treatment for thoracolumbar fractures. Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation yields outcomes comparable to those of the standard open procedure and has the advantages of less stress, bleeding, and pain, as well as rapid postoperative recovery. The main objective of this research was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two surgical approaches (open and percutaneous posterior spinal stabilization), concentrating on nonosteoporotic AO Spine Type A3 thoracolumbar burst fractures between T11 and L2. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study in our hospital, where cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures meeting the inclusion criteria were chosen retrospectively from April 2022 to March2023. A total of 54 patients (aged 18-60 years) who underwent spinal stabilization were included in this investigation. The population was divided into two cohorts, with 27 patients in each: Group A underwent open posterior spinal stabilization, and Group B underwent percutaneous posterior spinal stabilization. Data retrieved from medical records were analyzed with at least a six-month follow-up, mainly assessing the demographic data, intraoperative parameters, duration of hospitalization, clinical outcomes (Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and McGill Pain Questionnaire scores), and radiological outcomes (vertebral wedge angle and correction loss). Results Both groups had a male preponderance. There were statistically meaningful distinctions between both groups regarding intraoperative parameters (blood loss and surgical duration) and primary clinical outcome parameters (Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and McGill Pain Questionnaire scores) in the early phase of the study. However, there were no statistically significant differences concerning radiological parameters (vertebral wedge angle and correction loss) or primary clinical outcome parameters at the last follow-up. Conclusion The treatment modalities (open and percutaneous posterior spinal stabilization surgery) were equally safe and effective. However, the percutaneous group demonstrated significant reductions in the length of the surgical procedure, blood loss during surgery, duration of hospital stay, and immediate postoperative pain scores, all of which could potentially benefit patients.

High Preoperative Canal Compromise as Risk Factor for Worse Neurological Outcome in Patients with Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture After Spinal Decompression and Stabilization Surgery

High Preoperative Canal Compromise as Risk Factor for Worse Neurological Outcome in Patients with Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture After Spinal Decompression and Stabilization Surgery

Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with spinal stabilization surgery—a novel treatment strategy for spinal metastases based on a first single-center experiences

IntroductionCurrent treatment of spinal metastases (SM) aims on preserving spinal stability, neurological status, and functional status as well as achieving local control. It consists of spinal surgery followed by radiotherapy and/or systemic treatment. Adjuvant therapy usually starts with a delay of a few weeks to prevent wound healing issues. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has previously been successfully applied during brain tumor, breast and colorectal carcinoma surgery but not in SM, including unstable one, to date. In our case series, we describe the feasibility, morbidity and mortality of a novel treatment protocol for SM combining stabilization surgery with IORT.MethodsSingle center case series on patients with SM. Single session stabilization by navigated open or percutaneous procedure using a carbon screw-rod system followed by concurrent 50 kV photon-IORT (ZEISS Intrabeam). The IORT probe is placed via a guide canula using navigation, positioning is controlled by IOCT or 3D-fluroscopy enabling RT isodose planning in the OR.Results15 (8 female) patients (71 ± 10y) received this treatment between 07/22 and 09/23. Median Spinal Neoplastic Instability Score was 8 [7–10] IQR. Most metastasis were located in the thoracic (n = 11, 73.3%) and the rest in the lumbar (n = 4, 26.7%) spine. 9 (60%) patients received open, 5 (33%) percutaneous stabilization and 1 (7%) decompression only. Mean length of surgery was 157 ± 45 min. Eleven patients had 8 and 3 had 4 screws placed. In 2 patients radiotherapy was not completed due to bending of the guide canula with consecutive abortion of IORT. All other patients received 8 Gy isodoses at mdn. 1.5 cm [1.1–1.9, IQR] depth during 2-6 min. The patients had Epidural Spinal Cord Compression score 1a-3. Seven patients (46.7%) experienced adverse events including 2 surgical site infection (one 65 days after surgery).Conclusion50 kV photon IORT for SM and consecutive unstable spine needing surgical intervention is safe and feasible and can be a promising technique in selected cases.

118 Intraoperative Radiotherapy Combined With Spinal Stabilization Surgery. A Novel Treatment Strategy for Spinal Metastases. First Experiences at a Single Center

INTRODUCTION: Contemporary treatment of spinal metastases (SM) aims on preserving spinal stability, neurological status, local control and functional status. It consists of spinal surgery followed by radio- and chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy is performed after several weeks to prevent wound healing issues. Intraoperative radiotherapy (ioRT) is a solution to shorten treatment time, successfully applied in brain tumor, breast and colorectal surgery but not SM to date. METHODS: Results on morbidity and mortality of ioRT combined with stabilization surgery in SM in a first single center series are described. Stabilization is performed as CT-navigated open or percutaneous procedure using a carbon screw-rod system followed by 50kV photon-ioRT using the ZEISS Intrabeam during a single session in prone position. The ioRT probe is placed through a guide canula via navigation and positioning is controlled by ioCT to enable RT isodose planning in the OR. Patient characteristics, perioperative specifications and postoperative follow up along with adverse events (AE) are reported. RESULTS: 11 (7 female) patients (69 ± 9.4y) received treatment from 07/22-04/23. Median SINS was 8 [7-10] IQR, with metastasis located in thoracic (n = 9) and lumbar (n = 2) spine. 6 patients receive open, 4 percutaneous stabilization and 1 decompression only. Mean length of surgery was 153±52 min. with 2 Patients receiving 4 and 8 patients receiving 8 screws respectively. In 2 Patients radiotherapy was not completed due to bending of the guide canula with consecutive security abortion of ioRT. All other patients received 8Gy isodoses during 2-6 min. Patients treated had ESCC 1a-2. Mean follow up was 63 ± 49 days. 4 patients experienced AEs including 1 case of fatal surgical site infection. CONCLUSIONS: 50 kV photon ioRT for SM can be a promising technique for selected cases of SM.

Clinical outcomes of 20 brachycephalic dogs with thoracolumbar spinal deformities causing neurological signs treated with spinal stabilization using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides.

To describe the clinical outcomes for pugs and French bulldogs with congenital vertebral malformations, undergoing thoracolumbar spinal stabilization surgery using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides. To evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in this group of dogs. Retrospective descriptive study. Twenty dogs (12 pugs and eight French bulldogs). Medical records searched between August 2018 and March 2021 for pugs and French bulldogs diagnosed with congenital vertebral abnormalities via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and computed tomography (CT) scan causing T3-L3 myelopathy signs that underwent spinal stabilization surgery using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides followed by a postoperative CT scan. The short-term outcome was based on the neurological grade (modified Frankel score-MFS) on the day after surgery, day of discharge, and at the follow-up examination at 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. The mid-term outcome was obtained via an online questionnaire (or direct examination in one case). Twenty dogs met the inclusion criteria (19/20 grade 2 MFS, 1/20 grade 4 MFS). No complications were reported in the immediate postoperative period and optimal pedicle screw placement was obtained in 169/201 of screws. Twenty-four hours after surgery 16/20 dogs displayed an unchanged neurological grade. Short-term outcomes revealed a static (17/20) or improved (2/20) neurological grade. Ten owners participated in the online questionnaire. All patients were reported to be ambulatory; however, 7/10 dogs displayed abnormal gait. Neurological signs had remained static (6/10) or improved (3/10) in comparison with the dogs' preoperative status at a median of 883.5 days from the surgery. Dogs in this study had a favorable short-term outcome and mid-term outcome evaluation revealed a static/improved neurological status. Thoracolumbar spinal stabilization surgery using 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides showed a favorable outcome in brachycephalic breeds affected by vertebral deformities.

Bone density of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine measured using Hounsfield units of computed tomography – results of 4350 vertebras

IntroductionThe assessment of bone density has gained significance in recent years due to the aging population. Accurate assessment of bone density is crucial when deciding on the appropriate treatment plan for spinal stabilization surgery. The objective of this work was to determine the trabecular bone density values of the subaxial cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine using Hounsfield units.Material and methodsData from 200 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced polytrauma computed tomography at a maximum care hospital over a two-year period were retrospectively analyzed. HUs were measured with an elliptical measurement field in three different locations within the vertebral body: below the upper plate, in the middle of the vertebral body, and above the base plate. The measured Hounsfield units were converted into bone density values using a validated formula.ResultsThe mean age of the patient collective was 47.05 years. Mean spinal bone density values decreased from cranial to caudal (C3: 231.79 mg/cm3; L5: 155.13 mg/cm3; p < 0.001), with the highest values in the upper cervical spine. Bone density values generally decreased with age in all spinal segments. There was a clear decrease in values after age 50 years (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn our study, bone density decreased from cranial to caudal with higher values in the cervical spine. These data from the individual spinal segments may be helpful to comprehensively evaluate the status of the spine and to design a better preoperative plan before instrumentation.

Sagittal Profi le of the Spine in Patients after Lumbar Stabilisation Surgeries

Spine stabilization surgery is nowadays one of the most common spinal surgical procedures. Spinopelvic alignment is considered to be an important factor impacting the patients' preoperative diffi culties as well as the outcome of surgery. In our study, the outcomes of stabilization surgeries in patients with lumbar spine disorders were evaluated - especially in those with stenosis and spondylolisthesis, in whom the importance of sagittal parameters were assessed with respect to the patients' clinical outcomes and diffi culties. The study included 50 patients with lumbar spine disorders who had undergone a spine stabilization surgery for a degenerative disease - lumbar spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis between 2015 and 2017. Spino-pelvic radiological parameters and clinical parameters were evaluated using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests. In 38 of 50 patients, who at the end of the follow-up period did not have the PI-LL (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis) mismatch, i.e. PI-LL was ≤10°, a statistically signifi cant difference in pelvic tilt (p=0.049) and sagittal vertical axis (p<0.001) was reported, which was not the case in the remaining patients of the study population. Claudication and OSWESTRY (ODI) showed no statistically signifi cant difference. We have also compared the differences in the number of fused vertebrae and type of stabilization. A signifi cant change was seen in the claudication parameter at 12 and 24 months after surgery (p=0.007, p=0.005), with better outcomes achieved by 360° lumbar fusion compared to posterior lumbar fusion. The improvement of VAS and ODI scores in both the groups over time (from 6.1 to 3.6 or from 6.3 to 3.5 in VAS and from 62 to 32, or from 62 to 30 in ODI) was also statistically signifi cant (p<0.001 in both groups), while when comparing the groups against each other it was statistically insignifi cant. The authors confi rmed signifi cant improvement in the studied clinical parameters in all groups of patients (VAS, ODI, claudication), which is consistent with the results of recently published papers. The authors also established the correlation between different radiological parameters in the studied groups. The results do not confi rm the importance of the length or type of instrumentation for the clinical outcomes. This is consistent with the fi ndings of other published manuscripts. The authors failed to confi rm a signifi cant change in clinical parameters in dependence on the matching relationship between the pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis. Proper spinopelvic balance in patients after spinal surgery is a very important indicator of postoperative development and condition, but our cohort showed no statistically signifi cant difference in the clinical outcomes of patients whose postoperative sagittal parameters were unsatisfactory. sagittal profi le, spine stabilization, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sagittal vertical axis, SVA.

Radiation doses to patients during pedicle screw fixation of the spine

Objective. To analyze the radiation doses to patients during spinal decompression and stabilization surgery under optical CT navigation and fluoroscopy.Material and Methods. Study design: retrospective cohort study. The sample consisted of 164 patients who underwent transpedicular fixation of the spine performed by percutaneous or open techniques. In the O-arm group (n = 109), cone-beam CT combined with optical navigation was used; in the C-arm group, fluoroscopy (n = 55) was used. The effective dose equivalent (EDE) and the maximum absorbed dose (MAD) in the skin were evaluated.Results. EDE in the O-arm group was Me 9.1 mSv, [IQR: 7.1–11.6], and in the C-arm group –Me 1.8 mSv [IQR: 1.8–5.6], p &lt; 0.0001. Maximum absorbed dose in the skin in the O-arm group was Me 49.3 mGy [IQR: 27.0–96.9], and in the C-arm group – Me 36.1 mGy [IQR: 16.6–111.5], p = 0.424.Conclusion. The use of CT navigation and fluoroscopy during pedicle screw fixation of the spine is not associated with the risk of developing deterministic effects. The use of intraoperative CT navigation during pedicle screw fixation is associated with a greater patient EDE compared with that of fluoroscopy (p &lt; 0.05). Differences in EDE received by patients undergoing open and percutaneous techniques of pedicle screw fixation are statistically insignificant, regardless of the type of beam guidance and the number of fixation levels. The number of intraoperative CT scans is proportional to the patient EDE (p = 0.018).

An innovative method of interosseous lumbar spine stabilization surgery using the dynamic implant in a professional athlete as a way to return to competitive activity as quickly as possible

Objective: surgical intervention for spinal pathologies in professional athletes represents a pertinent topic in contemporary sports medicine and neurosurgery, given the extended rehabilitation period and potential decline in competitive activity following spinal surgeries. In this clinical case we describe an innovative technique for stabilizing the lumbar spine in an elite adult professional athlete which enables rapid return to regular competitive activities without restrictions.Materials and methods: a clinical case involving the surgical treatment of lumbar spine instability with compression of neural structures caused by an intervertebral disc herniation is presented. An innovative method for spinal stabilization employing an interbody dynamic implant is outlined.Results: the implementation of this spinal stabilization method allowed an adult professional elite futsal player to resume active physical sport-specific activities without any limitations just three weeks post-surgery.Conclusion: this clinical observation illustrates that spinal fixation using this novel and original method ensures the stability of the operated segment during physical exertion of any intensity.

Spinal metastases of bronchopulmonary cancer: Role of spinal surgery and value of prognostic scores (Modified Tokuhashi and Tomita)

IntroductionBone metastasis is frequent in bronchopulmonary cancer. We report a series of 52 patients, and analyze indications and the efficacy of surgery. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively studied the records of 52 patients operated on for spinal metastases of bronchopulmonary cancer over a 6-year period from January 2009 to December 2014 in the neurosurgery department of the North Hospital of Marseille, France. ResultsMean age was 63.6years; with a sex ratio of 3:1 (M:F). Spinal pain associated with vertebral fracture and spinal cord compression was the most frequent clinical presentation (59.6%). SINS score was≥7 in 78.9% of cases. Karnofski Performance Status was average in 67.4% of cases. Predicted survival beyond 12months was zero according to the modified Tokuhashi score. The surgical indication was essentially palliative. Evolution showed regression of pain in 84.6% of cases, and stabilization and improvement in motor deficit in 80.6%. Median postoperative survival was 16months. ConclusionOur results highlight the interest of surgery for pain relief, spinal stabilization and improvement in neurological function in patients with spinal metastases of bronchopulmonary cancer, and the unreliability of predictive survival scores.

Development of a Novel Passive-Dynamic Custom AFO for Drop-Foot Patients: Design Principles, Manufacturing Technique, Mechanical Properties Characterization and Functional Evaluation

Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are medical devices prescribed to support the foot and ankle of drop-foot patients. Passive-dynamic AFOs (PD-AFOs) are an effective solution for less severe cases. While off-the-shelf PD-AFOs are rather inexpensive, they provide poor anatomical fit and do not account for the required patient-specific biomechanical support. Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and manufacturing technologies allow manufacturing PD-AFOs customized for the patient’s anatomy and functional needs. This paper aimed to report the overall procedure for designing and manufacturing a novel, fiberglass-reinforced polyamide, custom PD-AFO. The feasibility of the proposed procedure was tested in a case study. The methodology can be divided into the following steps: (i) foot and leg scanning, (ii) 3D design, and (iii) additive manufacturing via selective laser sintering. A custom PD-AFO was designed and manufactured for a 67-year-old male drop-foot patient following paraparesis in severe discarthrosis after spine stabilization surgery. AFO mechanical properties were measured via an ad hoc setup based on a servohydraulic testing machine. The functional outcome was assessed via gait analysis in three conditions: shod (no AFO), wearing an off-the-shelf PD-AFO, and wearing the patient-specific PD-AFO. As expected, wearing the PD-AFO resulted in increased ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase with respect to the shod condition. Sagittal rotations of the hip, knee, and ankle joints were similar across PD-AFO conditions, but the custom PD-AFO resulted in faster walking speed with respect to the off-the-shelf (walking speed: 0.91 m/s versus 0.85 m/s). Additionally, the patient scored the custom PD-AFO as more comfortable (VAS score: 9.7 vs. 7.3). While the present analysis should be extended to a larger cohort of drop-foot patients, the novel PD-AFO seems to offer a valid, custom solution for drop-foot patients not satisfied with standard orthotics.

The Relation of Patient Expectations, Satisfaction, and Outcome in Surgery of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective Study.

We performed a prospective nonblinded single center observational study. To investigate the relationship between expectations, outcome, and satisfaction with the outcome in patients undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery. In modern healthcare, patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction have become an important aspect of quality control. Therefore, outcome benchmarks for specific diseases are highly desired. Numerous studies have investigated patient-reported outcome measures and what constitutes satisfaction in degenerative lumbar spine disease. In cervical spine surgery, it is less clear what drives the postoperative symptom burden and patient satisfaction and how this depends on the primary diagnosis and other patient factors. This was a prospective, single center, observational study on patients undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery for degenerative disease, trauma, infection, or tumor. Using the visual analogue scale for neck and arm pain, the neck disability index (NDI), the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (mJOA) and patient-reported satisfaction, patient status and expectations before surgery, at discharge, 6 and 12 months after surgery were evaluated. One hundred five patients were included. Score-based outcome correlated well with satisfaction at 6 and 12 months. Except for low NDI expectations (≥15 points) that correlated with dissatisfaction, expectations in no other score were correlated with satisfaction. Expectations did influence the outcome in some subgroups and meeting expectations resulted in higher rates of satisfaction. Pain reduction plays an important role for satisfaction, independently from the predominant symptom or pathology. Satisfaction correlates well with outcome. Meeting expectations did influence satisfaction with the outcome. The NDI seems to be a valuable preoperative screening tool for poor satisfaction at 12 months. In degenerative pathology, pain is the predominant variable influencing satisfaction independently from the predominant symptom (including myelopathy). 5.

Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System in Current Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

The number of spine surgeries using instrumentation has been increasing with recent advances in surgical techniques and spinal implants. Navigation systems have been attracting attention since the 1990s in order to perform spine surgeries safely and effectively, and they enable us to perform complex spine surgeries that have been difficult to perform in the past. Navigation systems are also contributing to the improvement of minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) surgery, which is becoming popular due to aging populations. Conventional navigation systems were based on reconstructions obtained by preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and did not always accurately reproduce the intraoperative patient positioning, which could lead to problems involving inaccurate positional information and time loss associated with registration. Since 2006, an intraoperative CT-based navigation system has been introduced as a solution to these problems, and it is now becoming the mainstay of navigated spine surgery. Here, we highlighted the use of intraoperative CT-based navigation systems in current spine surgery, as well as future issues and prospects.

Effect of continuous intra-incisional bupivacaine on postoperative pain in non-traumatic spinal fixation surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundContinuous injection of local anesthetics by using surgical wound catheters for postoperative pain relief has gained acceptance in recent years. However, whether this method can be alternatively used instead of systemic opioids in different surgical procedures has not yet been elucidated. ObjectivesThe aim was to investigate the effect of continuous injection of bupivacaine through a catheter inside the surgical wound on reducing the postoperative pain of lumbar spine fusion surgeries. MethodsIn this clinical trial, 31 patients undergoing non-traumatic lumbar spine stabilization surgery were randomly assigned to receive (n = 15) or do not receive (n = 16) bupivacaine through a catheter inside the surgical wound, postoperatively. Pain intensity (NRS), dose of required morphine, and drug-related complications within 24 hours of intervention were assessed and compared by the Mann-Whitney and independent t-test. ResultsMean pain intensity was significantly lower in the case group over the first postoperative hour in the recovery room (p < 0.001), which continued for the first 2 hours after entering the ward. The mean morphine intake was lower in the bupivacaine group during the first postoperative 24 hours (16 ± 0.88 vs. 7.33 ± 0.93 mg, p < 0.001). The two groups were not significantly different regarding drug-related complications. ConclusionContinuous intra-incisional infusion of bupivacaine helped better pain reduction during the early postoperative hours while sparing morphine consumption in the first postoperative day.

Autonomous lumbar spine pedicle screw planning using machine learning: A validation study.

Introduction:Several techniques for pedicle screw placement have been described including freehand techniques, fluoroscopy assisted, computed tomography (CT) guidance, and robotics. Image-guided surgery offers the potential to combine the benefits of CT guidance without the added radiation. This study investigated the ability of a neural network to place lumbar pedicle screws with the correct length, diameter, and angulation autonomously within radiographs without the need for human involvement.Materials and Methods:The neural network was trained using a machine learning process. The method combines the previously reported autonomous spine segmentation solution with a landmark localization solution. The pedicle screw placement was evaluated using the Zdichavsky, Ravi, and Gertzbein grading systems.Results:In total, the program placed 208 pedicle screws between the L1 and S1 spinal levels. Of the 208 placed pedicle screws, 208 (100%) had a Zdichavsky Score 1A, 206 (99.0%) of all screws were Ravi Grade 1, and Gertzbein Grade A indicating no breech. The final two screws (1.0%) had a Ravi score of 2 (<2 mm breech) and a Gertzbein grade of B (<2 mm breech).Conclusion:The results of this experiment can be combined with an image-guided platform to provide an efficient and highly effective method of placing pedicle screws during spinal stabilization surgery.

Clinical outcome following multisegmental cervical spinal fixation in patients who recovered partially following injury

Objective:The clinical outcome following multilevel stabilization in patients who suffered cervical spinal injury and developed severe neurological deficits and then gradually partially recovered is evaluated. The basis of the surgical concept was that cervical spinal degeneration is a result of single or multilevel spinal instability and that spinal trauma exaggerates the instability.Materials and Methods:During the period 2015–2020, 14 patients who suffered severe cervical spinal injury and could be included in the classification of spinal cord injury without computed tomography evidence of trauma were surgically treated. There were 11 males and 3 females. The ages ranged from 45 to 67 years, average being 53 years. Cervical canal stenoses related to degenerative spinal changes were observed in all patients. All patients suffered severe neurological deficits and within few days or weeks had shown significant but incomplete neurological recovery. The identification of the levels of unstable spinal segments was done on the basis of radiological and clinical parameters and direct observation of spinal instability in adjoining spinal segments. Transarticular fixation was done by Camille's transarticular fixation technique. Using ASIA score, modified JOA score, and Goel Clinical Grading Scale, the clinical course of the patients was monitored.Results:All patients showed recovery in the neurological status. Recovery started in the immediate postoperative period and the improvement progressed during the period of follow-up.Conclusions:Surgery for spinal stabilization can be indicated even in cases that improve in the neurological function.

Patient-Reported Expectations, Outcome and Satisfaction in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Study

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become an important aspect of quality control in modern healthcare. In this prospective observational study on 199 patients undergoing thoracolumbar stabilization surgery, we quantified preoperative expectations and PROMs at six and twelve months after surgery, and we investigated what constitutes patient satisfaction with the outcome. We used the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Preoperative expectations were high (expected ODI: 9 ± 13%; leg pain: 1.0 ± 1.4; back pain: 1.3 ± 1.5). Pain and disability improved substantially, but expectations were mostly unrealistic (ODI expectation fulfilled after six months: 28% of patients; back pain: 48%). However, satisfaction was high (70% at six months after surgery). Satisfied patients had significantly better pain and disability outcomes and higher rates of expectation fulfillment than non-satisfied patients. Patients undergoing revision stabilization had worse outcomes than all other diagnosis groups. Prior stabilization surgery was identified as an independent risk factor for dissatisfaction. There were no preoperative pain or disability levels that predicted dissatisfaction. The data presented in this study can provide benchmarks for diagnosis-specific PROM targets in thoracolumbar stabilization surgery. Future studies should investigate whether satisfaction can be influenced, e.g., by discussing realistic outcome targets with patients ahead of surgery.

Spine stabilization is a risk factor for the development of pelvic iliac vein lesions

BackgroundOpen lumbar spine stabilization surgery often requires mobilization of the left and right common iliac veins (CIVs) and the placement of plates and screws that can impinge on them. We reviewed our venography experience of the past 3 years to determine whether there is an association between spine stabilization surgery and the development of symptomatic iliac vein outflow lesions. MethodsA retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data from our electronic medical record system was performed to identify patients who underwent venography with or without venous stenting and had a history of previous lumbar spine stabilization. Patients' demographics, medical comorbidities, venograms, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data were collected and analyzed. The senior author reviewed all venograms and IVUS images of patients with previous spine stabilization procedures. ResultsFrom January 2014 to April 2018, venography was performed in 1713 limbs in 1245 patients at the Center for Vascular Medicine. Of the 1245 patients, 18 patients had a history of lumbar spine stabilization procedures: five anterior-posterior and 13 posterior. Nine had single-level and eight had two- or three-level fusions. All 18 patients demonstrated pelvic lesions. These included 1 left CIV aneurysm, 5 left CIV stenoses, 3 bilateral CIV stenoses, 2 left CIV and inferior vena cava occlusions, and 2 external iliac vein stenoses. The aneurysm patient was treated with anticoagulation, 8 patients underwent stenting, 1 patient refused stenting because of relocation to another country, 1 inferior vena cava-CIV occlusion could not be crossed, fear of dislodging a thrombus and the proximity to a protruding posteriorly placed screw prevented stenting in 2 patients, and 4 patients had a venoplasty alone because of undersizing of a stenosis or missed lesions with IVUS after review by a blinded reviewer. Lesions in anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients were extremely stenotic, required predilation, and resulted in a residual stenosis requiring venoplasty at a second setting in one patient. ConclusionsLumbar spine stabilization surgery may be a risk factor for development of symptomatic venous outflow obstruction lesions. During venography and stenting in patients with anterior lumbar interbody fusion approaches, significant scarring may be encountered, resulting in a residual stenosis after stent placement. Predilation venoplasty, before stent deployment, is recommended to prevent stent migration. Furthermore, a history of spine stabilization surgery in patients presenting with pelvic symptoms, lower extremity pain or swelling, or post-thrombotic symptoms should prompt consideration of a pelvic venous duplex ultrasound examination to determine whether an iliac venous outflow lesion is present.