Spinal Sagittal Malalignment Research Articles

Factors associated with the progression of sagittal spinal deformity after total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

The functional interaction between the hip and spine in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) is clinically significant, as it impacts post-operative outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to identify factors associated with the progression of sagittal spinal deformity and assess the association with patient-reported outcomes. This retrospective case-control study included 200 patients who underwent primary THA and completed a mean follow-up duration of 42.2months (range, 24.0-78.0). We employed a multivariate logistic regression to identify variables predictive of a post-THA sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥ 50mm, which was indicative of a spinal sagittal imbalance. Propensity score-matched cohorts for age, sex, body mass index, follow-up duration, hip flexion contracture, developmental dysplasia, pelvic incidence (PI), and SVA were created, and the outcomes were compared between the two groups. PI (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.86, p = 0.033) was associated with an SVA ≥ 50mm. After successfully matching patients with (n = 50) and without (n = 50) an SVA ≥ 50mm, the minimum clinically important difference showed significant differences between the 50 matched pairs (p = 0.016 for EuroQol-5D, p = 0.003 for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, and p < 0.001 for low back pain). PI is associated with the development of a positive sagittal spinal malalignment post-THA. This finding can assist surgeons in managing patient expectations and in optimising outcomes. Feasible strategies are warranted to minimise the risk of spinal deformity progression post-THA.

Gait alterations in patients with adult spinal deformity

Adult spinal deformity patients (ASD) experience altered spinal alignment affecting spatiotemporal parameters and joint kinematics. Differences in spinal deformity between patients with symptomatic idiopathic scoliosis (ID-ASD) and patients with "de novo" scoliosis (DN-ASD) may affect gait characteristics differently. This study aims to compare gait characteristics between ID-ASD, DN-ASD, and asymptomatic healthy matched controls. In this observational case-control study, ID-ASD (n=24) and DN-ASD (n=26) patients visiting the out-patient spine clinic and scheduled for long-segment spinal fusion were included. Patients were matched, based on age, gender, leg length and BMI, with asymptomatic healthy controls. Gait was measured at comfortable walking speed on an instrumented treadmill with 3D motion capture system. Trunk, pelvic and lower extremities range of motion (ROM) and spatiotemporal parameters (SPT) are presented as median (first and thirds quartile). Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare ID-ASD, DN-ASD and controls. Statistical Parametric Mapping (independent t-test) was used to compare 3D joint kinematics. DN-ASD patients walk with increased anterior trunk tilt during the whole gait cycle compared with ID-ASD patients and controls. ID-ASD walk with decreased trunk lateroflexion compared with DN-ASD and controls. DN-ASD showed decreased pelvic obliquity and -rotation, increased knee flexion, and decreased ankle plantar flexion. ID-ASD and DN-ASD displayed decreased trunk, pelvic and lower extremity ROM compared with controls, but increased pelvic tilt ROM. ID-ASD patients walked with comparable SPT to controls, whereas DN-ASD patients walked significantly slower with corresponding changes in SPT and wider steps. DN-ASD patients exhibit distinct alterations in SPT and kinematic gait characteristics compared with ID-ASD and controls. These alterations seem to be predominantly influenced by sagittal spinal malalignment and kinematic findings in ASD patients should not be generalized as such, but always be interpreted with consideration for the nature of the ASD.

Impact of spinal sagittal malalignment on locomotive syndrome and physical function in community-dwelling middle aged and older women

BackgroundAdult spinal deformity has a substantially debilitating effect on older people’s physical and mental health. However, the impact of sagittal malalignment on locomotive syndrome (LS), sarcopenia, and physical function in community-dwelling older women has not yet been clarified. This study aimed to investigate the association between these factors in community-dwelling middle aged and older women.MethodsA total of 361 women were recruited from participants performing aquatic exercises in a rural area of Japan. The body mass index, skeletal muscle mass index, trunk muscle mass, spinal inclination angle (SIA), grip strength, timed up-and-go test (TUG), maximum stride of the participants, and one-leg standing time were measured. Low back pain (LBP)- and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Short-Form 8 questionnaire. Associations between the global sagittal alignment using SIA and investigating parameters were analyzed.ResultsThe prevalence of sarcopenia was 3.6%. The prevalence of LS (stages 1, 2, and 3) was 43.8% (158 of 361), and the number of participants in each LS stage was 203 (stage 0), 95 (stage 1), 28 (stage 2), and 35 (stage 3). The SIA was significantly correlated with the 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale (r′ = 0.292, p < 0.001), ODI (r′ = 0.267, p < 0.001), and TUG (r′ = 0.453, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age. In the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff values of SIA for LS ≥ stage 2 and ODI ≥ 20% were 5°.ConclusionsLBP-related QOL and physical performance were significantly associated with global sagittal alignment. Global sagittal alignment was correlated with the three-stage category of LS. The spinal inclination of 5° was a cutoff value to predict exacerbation of mobility function and HRQOL status.

Compensation Characteristics of Spinal Sagittal Malalignment According to Pelvic Incidence in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Compensation characteristics of spinal sagittal malalignment according to pelvic incidence (PI) have yet to be elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the difference in compensatory segments according to PI in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). This retrospective study included 196 patients (143 females, 53 males) suffering from DLSS with an average age of 66.73 years in our department. Sagittal parameters were obtained on the whole spinal lateral radiograph, including T1-T12 slope (T1S-T12S), Cobb angle (CA) of the functional units of the thoracic spine, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), PI, the ratio of PT to PI (PT/PI), PI minus LL mismatch (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Patients were divided into the low and high PI groups according to the median value of PI. With reference to the value of SVA and PI-LL, each PI group was further grouped into the balance subgroup (SVA < 50 mm, PI-LL ≤10°), hidden imbalance subgroup (SVA < 50 mm, PI-LL > 10°), and imbalance subgroup (SVA ≥50 mm). Independent samples t-test/Mann-Whitney U test, one-way ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis test, and Person correlation analysis were utilized for statistical test. The median value of PI was 47.65°. 96 and 100 patients were assigned to low and high PI groups, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that the T8-T12 slope and T10-T12 slope were associated with PI-LL in the high and low PI groups, respectively (all, p < 0.01). For segmental lordosis, T8-9 to T11-12 CA and T10-11 to T11-12 CA were associated with PI-LL in the high and low PI groups, respectively (all, p < 0.01). In the high PI cohort, T8-12 CA and PT increased significantly from the balance to imbalance subgroups (both, p < 0.05). In the low PI cohort, T10-12 CA and PT first increased and then decreased from the balance to imbalance subgroups (both, p < 0.05). T8-12 was the main compensatory segment of the thoracic spine in patients with high PI, while it was T10-12 in patients with low PI. In addition, the compensation potential of the lower thoracic spine and pelvis in patients with low PI was inferior to those with high PI.

Bone microstructure and volumetric bone mineral density in patients with global sagittal malalignment.

Sagittal spinal malalignment often leads to surgical realignment, which is associated with major complications. Low bone mineral density (BMD) and impaired bone microstructure are risk factors for instrumentation failure. This study aims to demonstrate differences in volumetric BMD and bone microstructure between normal and pathological sagittal alignment and to determine the relationships among vBMD, microstructure, sagittal spinal and spinopelvic alignment. A retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degeneration was conducted. The vBMD of the lumbar spine was assessed by quantitative computed tomography. Bone biopsies were evaluated using microcomputed tomography (μCT). C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; ≥ 50mm malalignment) and spinopelvic alignment were measured. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis evaluated associations among the alignment, vBMD and μCT parameters. A total of 172 patients (55.8% female, 63.3years, BMI 29.7kg/m2, 43.0% with malalignment) including N = 106 bone biopsies were analyzed. The vBMD at levels L1, L2, L3 and L4 and the trabecular bone (BV) and total volume (TV) were significantly lower in the malalignment group. SVA was significantly correlated with vBMD at L1-L4 (ρ = -0.300, p < 0.001), BV (ρ = - 0.319, p = 0.006) and TV (ρ = - 0.276, p = 0.018). Significant associations were found between PT and L1-L4 vBMD (ρ = - 0.171, p = 0.029), PT and trabecular number (ρ = - 0.249, p = 0.032), PT and trabecular separation (ρ = 0.291, p = 0.012), and LL and trabecular thickness (ρ = 0.240, p = 0.017). In the multivariable analysis, a higher SVA was associated with lower vBMD (β = - 0.269; p = 0.002). Sagittal malalignment is associated with lower lumbar vBMD and trabecular microstructure. Lumbar vBMD was significantly lower in patients with malalignment. These findings warrant attention, as malalignment patients may be at a higher risk of surgery-related complications due to impaired bone. Standardized preoperative assessment of vBMD may be advisable.

Compensatory classification in spine sagittal malalignment with lumbar degeneration

ObjectiveTo generate a compensatory classification to evaluate sagittal spinal malalignment with lumbar degeneration.MethodsWe included 162 patients with low back pain who underwent full-length spinal radiography in our hospital from August 2019 to October 2021. Using full-length spine X-rays, we measured pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), C7 slope (C7S), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). We also recorded the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were divided into four groups based on the SRS-Schwab classification and four other groups based on the compensatory classification.ResultsODI correlated with age, SS, LL, TK, C7-SVA, SRS-Schwab classification, and compensatory classification. Lumbar VAS score correlated with LL, TK, C7-SVA, SRS-Schwab classification, and compensatory classification. Leg VAS score only correlated with LL. Hidden imbalance and imbalance with compensation had more significant PT and larger TK than balance patients. The symptoms of the four compensatory classification groups gradually worsened.ConclusionThe spinal-pelvic sagittal balance in patients with lumbar degeneration based on pelvic and thoracic compensation can reflect spinal balance and symptoms. This parameter might help evaluate spine sagittal alignment in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration.

Differences in lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology in patients with sagittal malalignment undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery.

To investigate whether (1) there is a difference between patients with normal or sagittal spinal and spinopelvic malalignment in terms of their paraspinal muscle composition and (2) if sagittal malalignment can be predicted using muscle parameters. A retrospective review of patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery was conducted. A MRI-based muscle measurement technique was used to assess the cross-sectional area, the functional cross-sectional area, the intramuscular fat and fat infiltration (FI) for the psoas and the posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM). Intervertebral disc degeneration was graded for levels L1 to S1. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA; ≥ 50mm defined as spinal malalignment), pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured, and PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL; ≥ 10° defined as spinopelvic malalignment) was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the FIPPM for predicting sagittal malalignment. One hundred and fifty patients were analysed. The PI-LL and SVA malalignment groups were found to have a significantly higher FIPPM (PI-LL:47.0 vs. 42.1%; p = 0.019; SVA: 47.7 vs. 41.8%; p = 0.040). ROC analysis predicted sagittal spinal malalignment using FIPPM (cut-off value 42.69%) with a sensitivity of 73.4% and a specificity of 54.1% with an area under the curve of 0.662. Significant differences in the muscle composition between normal and malalignment groups with respect to FIPPM in both sagittal spinal and spinopelvic alignment were found. This work underlines the imminent impact of the paraspinal musculature on the sagittal alignment.

Alterations of gait kinematics depend on the deformity type in the setting of adult spinal deformity.

To evaluate 3D kinematic alterations during gait in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) subjects with different deformity presentations. One hundred nineteen primary ASD (51 ± 19y, 90F), age and sex-matched to 60 controls, underwent 3D gait analysis with subsequent calculation of 3D lower limb, trunk and segmental spine kinematics as well as the gait deviation index (GDI). ASD were classified into three groups: 51 with sagittal malalignment (ASD-Sag: SVA > 50mm, PT > 25°, and/or PI-LL > 10°), 28 with only frontal deformity (ASD-Front: Cobb > 20°) and 40 with only hyperkyphosis (ASD-HyperTK: TK > 60°). Kinematics were compared between groups. ASD-Sag had a decreased pelvic mobility compared to controls with a decreased ROM of hips (38 vs. 45°) and knees (51 vs. 61°). Furthermore, ASD-Sag exhibited a decreased walking speed (0.8 vs. 1.2m/s) and GDI (80 vs. 95, all p < 0.05) making them more prone to falls. ASD-HyperTK showed similar patterns but in a less pronounced way. ASD-Front had normal walking patterns. GDI, knee flex/extension and walking speed were significantly associated with SVA and PT (r = 0.30-0.65). Sagittal spinal malalignment seems to be the driver of gait alterations in ASD. Patients with higher GT, SVA, PT or PI-LL tended to walk slower, with shorter steps in order to maintain stability with a limited flexibility in the pelvis, hips and knees. These changes were found to a lesser extent in ASD with only hyperkyphosis but not in those with only frontal deformity. 3D gait analysis is an objective tool to evaluate functionality in ASD patients depending on their type of spinal deformity. Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Paraspinal musculature impairment is associated with spinopelvic and spinal malalignment in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe concept of sagittal spinal malalignment is well established in spinal surgery. However, the effect of musculature on its development has not been fully considered and the position of the pelvis is mostly seen as compensatory and not necessarily a possible cause of sagittal imbalance. PURPOSEThis study aimed to investigate the influence of the posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM, erector spinae, and multifidus) and the psoas muscle on spinopelvic and spinal alignment. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion between 2014 and 2021 for degenerative conditions at a tertiary care center, with preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 12 months prior the surgery and a preoperative whole spine radiograph were included. OUTCOME MEASURESPPM and psoas muscle measurements including the cross-sectional area (CSA), the functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), the amount of intramuscular fat (FAT), and the percentage of fat infiltration (FI). Spinopelvic measurements including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). METHODSA T2-weighted MRI-based quantitative assessment of the CSA, the fCSA and the amount FAT was conducted, and FI was further calculated. The regions of interest included the psoas muscle and the PPM on both sides at the L4 level that were summarized and normalized by the patient's height (cm2/m2). LL, PT, SS, PI, and SVA were determined on standing lateral radiographs. Spearman correlation was used to calculate the crude relationship between spinopelvic and muscle parameters. Multiple linear regression models with age, sex, LL, PT, SS, and SVA set as independent variables were established to determine the association with spinal muscle outcome measures. RESULTSA total of 150 patients (53.3% female) were included in the final analysis with a median age of 65.6 years and a median BMI of 28.2 kg/m2. Significant positive correlations were observed between PT (ρ=0.327), SVA (ρ=0.256) and PI (ρ=0.202) and the FIPPM. Significant negative correlations were detected for the PT and the fCSAPPM (ρ=-0.202) and PT and the fCSAPsoas (ρ=-0.191). Furthermore, a negative correlation was seen for PI and SVA and FIPsoas. PT (β=0.187; p=.006), SVA (β=0.155; p=.035), age (β=0.468; p<.001) and sex (β=0.235; p<.001) significantly predict FIPPM (corrected R2=0.393) as independent variables. CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrated the potential role of posterior paraspinal muscles and psoas muscle on pelvic retroversion and elucidated the relation to sagittal spinal malalignment. Although we cannot establish causality, we propose that increasing FIPPM, representing loss of muscular strength, may lead to increased pelvic retroversion and thus might be the initiating point for the development of the sagittal imbalance. These findings might challenge the well-known theory of increased pelvic retroversion being a compensatory mechanism for sagittal spinal balance. Thus, muscular weakness might be a factor involved in the development of sagittal spinal malalignment.

Predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in patients with lumbar stenosis after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery

BackgroundTo explore the predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in the elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 82 LSS patients with sagittal malalignment (SVA ≥ 50 mm or PT ≥ 20° or PI-LL ≥ 20°) who underwent short-segment decompression and fusion surgery between January 2019 and March 2021. Patients’ characteristic, radiographic and paravertebral muscle parameters were assessed. The patients were divided into group A (postoperative malalignment) and B (postoperative alignment) according to whether the postoperative restoration of the sagittal alignment was achieved.ResultsThere existed more males in group B than in group A (p = 0.002). The age of group A (73.36 ± 8.02) was greater than that of group B (69.08 ± 6.07, p = 0.009). Preoperative PT in group A (27.40 ± 5.82) was greater than that in group B (19.30 ± 7.32, p < 0.001). The functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) in group A (28.73 ± 4.23) was lower than that in group B (36.94 ± 7.81, p < 0.001). And the fatty infiltration rate (FI) of group A (27.16% ± 5.58%) was higher than that of group B (22.61% ± 5.81%, p = 0.001). The fCSA was negatively correlated with the postoperative PT and PTr (p < 0.05).ConclusionStronger lumbar paravertebral muscles, smaller preoperative PI, PT or PI-LL, male and younger age are the predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in the elderly LSS patients after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery.

Correction of the pelvic incidence using a bilateral extending pelvic osteotomy: a proof of concept study

IntroductionThe aim of this proof of concept human cadaver study was to quantify the effect of a bilateral extending pelvic osteotomy (BEPO) on pelvic incidence (PI) as a potential alternative for a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in patients with severe spinal sagittal malalignment.Materials and methods10 fresh frozen human cadavers were treated with the BEPO technique. CT images were made before and after the osteotomy and pure sagittal images were created on which PI was measured.ResultsThe mean pre-osteotomy PI was 47.9° (range 36.4–63.9) and the mean post-osteotomy PI was 36.5° (range 22.1–54.4). The mean correction was − 10.4° with a range of − 8.4° to − 17.3° (p = 0.03), which resulted in a mean decrease of 23% in the PI (range 16–42).ConclusionsThere was a feasible and effective correction of PI using the BEPO technique on the os ilium. This was a preliminary cadaveric study. No conclusions could be made on global sagittal alignment. We postulate that an extending osteotomy of the ilium could be a potential alternative for a PSO reducing the complexity of spine surgery in patients with severe spinal sagittal malalignment.

Decreased muscle mass and strength affected spinal sagittal malalignment.

Correction surgeries for spinal malalignment showed good clinical outcomes; however, there were concerns including increased invasiveness, complications, and impact on medico-economics. Ideally, an early intervention is needed. To better understand the patho-mechanism and natural course of spinal alignment, the effect of factors such as muscle mass and strength on spinal sagittal imbalance were determined in a multicenter cross-sectional study. After excluding metal implant recipients, 1823 of 2551 patients (mean age: 69.2 ± 13.8years; men 768, women 1055) were enrolled. Age, sex, past medical history (Charlson comorbidity index), body mass index (BMI), grip strength (GS), and trunk muscle mass (TM) were reviewed. Spinal sagittal imbalance was determined by the SRS-Schwab classification. Multiple comparison analysis among four groups (Normal, Mild, Moderate, Severe) and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed. On multiple comparison analysis, with progressing spinal malalignment, age in both sexes tended to be higher; further, TM in women and GS in both sexes tended to be low. On multinomial logistic regression analysis, age and BMI were positively associated with spinal sagittal malalignment in Mild, Moderate, and Severe groups. TM in Moderate and Severe groups and GS in the Moderate group were negatively associated with spinal sagittal malalignment. Aging, obesity, low TM, and low GS are potential risk factors for spinal sagittal malalignment. Especially, low TM and low GS are potentially associated with more progressed spinal sagittal malalignment. Thus, early intervention for muscles, such as exercise therapy, is needed, while the spinal sagittal alignment is normal or mildly affected.

Effect of Coronal and Sagittal Spinal Malalignment on Spinopelvic Mobility in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective Observational Study.

This was a prospective observational study. This investigation aimed (1) to determine the impact of sagittal spinal alignment with C7-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and Roussouly classification on individual segments of spinopelvic mobility represented by lumbar flexibility [∆lumbar lordosis (LL)], pelvic mobility [∆pelvic tilt (PT)], and hip motion [∆pelvic femoral angle (PFA)] and (2) to assess the influence of coronal spinal balance on the spinopelvic complex in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) preoperatively and postoperatively. Restricted spinopelvic mobility gained attention as a contributing factor for THA instability. However, it remains unclear what influence the coronal and sagittal spinal alignment has on spinopelvic mobility. A total of 197 THA patients were included in the investigation conducting biplanar stereoradiography in standing and sitting position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-SVA (≤50 mm balanced, >50 mm imbalanced), PI-LL (≤10 degrees balanced, >10 degrees imbalanced), refounded Roussouly classification, coronal spinal balance with C7-central sacral vertical line, LL, pelvic incidence (PI), PT, PFA. Individual segments of spinopelvic mobility based on the change from standing to sitting were defined as ∆LL, ∆PT, and ∆PFA. Unpaired t test or Welch t test for comparison between groups of 2 was applied. Analysis of variance and post hoc analysis according to Bonferroni or Games-Howell was used to determine differences between groups of >2. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the interrater reliability of the radiographic measurements. Significant differences were demonstrated for ∆LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 24.7 degrees/19.1 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 24.4 degrees/16.4 degrees, P <0.000), PT (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 12.5 degrees/15.2 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 10.8 degrees/20.5 degrees, P <0.000), PI (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 52.9 degrees/56.9 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 52.1 degrees/61.0 degrees, P <0.000), LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 54.8 degrees/47.8 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 55.3 degrees/42.6 degrees, P <0.000). The coronal spinal balance (central sacral vertical line) indicated no significant differences regarding spinopelvic mobility between positive, neutral, or negative balanced groups. Significant differences with decreased pelvic mobility (∆PT) and lumbar flexibility (∆LL) in low-grade PI types 1 and 2 compared with high-grade PI type 4 according to the Roussouly classification were observed. This is the first study to investigate spinal sagittal alignment using 3 different classifications in association to the spinopelvic complex in THA patients preoperatively and postoperatively. The significantly altered spinopelvic mechanics with decreased lumbar flexibility and increased pelvic retroversion in sagittal imbalanced patients clearly indicate the need for a separate consideration of the global spinal sagittal alignment. Our findings emphasize the importance of risk stratification for THA candidates in terms of sagittal imbalance attempting to mitigate the THA instability risk with accurate preoperative planning. Level III.

Clinical characteristics of geriatric patients with non-specific chronic low back pain

A comprehensive analysis of clinical information in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) was performed to clarify the clinical characteristics of geriatric LBP from the perspective of body composition, spinal alignment, and blood findings related to senescence. We enrolled 203 patients with an average age of 79.0 years (77 men and 126 women), with non-specific CLBP as a single-center prospective cohort study, the patients were compared with age- and sex-matched controls without CLBP using a propensity score-matching. We performed laboratory analysis, radiographic evaluations for global spinal parameter and lumbar degeneration, and body composition analysis using whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We observed a higher red blood cell distribution width (RDW) (p < 0.001), which is an index of aging, as well as a lower vitamin D level (p = 0.002), skeletal muscle mass index (p = 0.045) and a higher fat mass (p = 0.007) in patients with CLBP. Moreover, patients with geriatric CLBP had significantly lower lumbar lordosis (p = 0.024), and higher sagittal vertical axis (p = 0.006) was correlated with lower extremity and trunk muscle mass (p < 0.001), independent of lumbar degeneration. Geriatric patients with CLBP have sarcopenic fat accumulation and spinal sagittal malalignment with senescent status, such as elevated RDW and hypovitaminosis D.

Impact of Spinal Sagittal Malalignment on Locomotive Syndrome and Physical Function in Community-Living Older Women

Impact of Spinal Sagittal Malalignment on Locomotive Syndrome and Physical Function in Community-Living Older Women

Biomechanical In Vitro and Finite Element Study on Different Sagittal Alignment Postures of the Lumbar Spine During Multiaxial Daily Motion.

Lumbar lordotic correction (LLC), the gold standard treatment for sagittal spinal malalignment (SMA), and its effect on sagittal balance have been critically discussed in recent studies. This paper assesses the biomechanical response of the spinal components to LLC as an additional factor for the evaluation of LLC. Human lumbar spines (L2L5) were loaded with combined bending moments in flexion (Flex)/extension (Ex) or lateral bending (LatBend) and axial rotation (AxRot) in a physiological environment. We examined the dependency of AxRot range of motion (RoM) on the applied bending moment. The results were used to validate a finite element (FE) model of the lumbar spine. With this model, the biomechanical response of the intervertebral discs (IVD) and facet joints under daily motion was studied for different sagittal alignment postures, simulated by a motion in Flex/Ex direction. Applied bending moments decreased AxRot RoM significantly (all P < 0.001). A stronger decline of AxRot RoM for Ex than for Flex direction was observed (all P < 0.0001). Our simulated results largely agreed with the experimental data (all R2 > 0.79). During the daily motion, the IVD was loaded higher with increasing lumbar lordosis (LL) for all evaluated values at L2L3 and L3L4 and posterior annulus stress (AS) at L4L5 (all P < 0.0476). The results of this study indicate that LLC with large extensions of LL may not always be advantageous regarding the biomechanical loading of the IVD. This finding may be used to improve the planning process of LLC treatments.

Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain in Elderly Patients

Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common causes of disabilities in old people often due to lumber degeneration (osteoarthritis) and spinal canal stenosis. In our study, we determine the prevalence and associated changes of low back pain that increase with age.&#x0D; Methodology: This observational cohort study was carried out from March 2019 to March 2021 at the El-Moussenin Center in Port Said. The study included 300 patients aged ≥65 years with a chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least six months, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 3 and more, and an absence of spinal pathology such as infection, tumor, fracture, spondylolisthesis, or spinal degeneration of grade 2 and above. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) a study group including patients with a mean age of 75 years with nonspecific chronic LBP (n = 150) and (ii) an age- and sex-matched control group (n = 150) with no chronic low back pain using propensity score-matched analysis. All patients underwent whole spinal X-ray, lumbar MRI, CBC, and DXA.&#x0D; Result: We analyzed laboratory finding, radiological finding for global spinal parameter, and lumber degeneration body composition analysis using whole body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. We found increase in red blood cell distribution width (it is an index of aging), it was higher in geriatric with CLBP (32) and in control (6.9) with a p-value &lt; 0.001. Skeletal muscle mass index was 6.23 ± 0.92 in the studied group and 6.43 ± 1.02 in the control group with a p-value = 0.045. Increase in fat mass was noted in both the studied (32.17 ± 7.07) and the control (29.28 ± 7.48) groups with a p-value &lt; 0.001. Moreover, those patients had lower lumbar lordosis, higher sagittal vertical axis regarding decrease in muscle mass in trunk and extremities.&#x0D; Conclusion: Red blood cell distribution width which is a sign of aging was high in geriatric group with CLBP. Moreover, geriatric CLBP is often associated with osteoporosis which affects the pain threshold and triggers CLBP due to age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and spinal sagittal malalignment.

The role of femoral obliquity angle and T1 pelvic angle in predicting quality of life after spinal surgery in adult spinal deformities

BackgroundAdult spinal deformities (ASD) represent a growing clinical condition related to chronic pain, disability and reduction in quality of life (QoL). A strong correlation among spinal alignment, spinopelvic parameters and QoL after spinal fusion surgery in ASD patients was thoroughly investigated over the last decade, However, only few studies focused on the relationship between lumbo-pelvic-femoral parameters - such as Femoral Obliquity Angle (FOA), T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA) and QoL.MethodsRadiological and clinical data from 43 patients surgically treated with thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion for ASD between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were the correlation between preoperative spino-pelvic-femoral parameters and postoperative clinical, functional outcomes and QoL. Secondary outcomes were: changes in sagittal radiographic parameters spino-pelvic-femoral, clinical and functional outcomes and the rate of complications after surgery.ResultsUsing Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, spinopelvic femoral parameters (FOA, TPA, pre and post-operative) are directly statistically correlated to the quality of life (ODI, SRS-22, pre and post-operative; > 0,6 strong correlation, p < 0.05). Stratifying the patients according pre preoperative FOA value (High FOA ≥ 10 and Normal/Low FOA < 10), those belonging to the first group showed worse clinical (VAS: 5.2 +/− 1.4 vs 2.9 +/− 0.8) and functional outcomes (ODI: 35.6+/− 6.8 vs 23.2 +/− 6.5) after 2 years of follow-up and a greater number of mechanical complications (57.9% vs 8.3% p < 0.0021).ConclusionBased on our results, preoperative FOA and TPA could be important prognostic parameters for predicting disability and quality of life after spinal surgery in ASD patients and early indicators of possible spinal sagittal malalignment. FOA and TPA, like other and better known spinopelvic parameters, should always be considered when planning corrective surgery in ASD patients.

Understanding sagittal compensation in adult spinal deformity patients: relationship between pelvic tilt and lower-extremity position.

In adult spinal deformity (ASD), quantifying preoperative lower-extremity (LE) compensation is important in formulating an operative plan to achieve optimal global sagittal alignment. Whole-body radiographs are not always available. This study evaluated the possibility of estimating LE compensation without whole-body radiographs. In total, 200 consecutive ASD patients with full-body radiographic assessment were categorized into the following three groups according to their cranio-hip balance (distance from the cranial sagittal vertical axis to the hip axis [CrSVA-H]): group 1, anterior-shift (A-shift) group (CrSVA-H > 40 mm); group 2, balanced group, -40 mm < CrSVA-H < 40 mm; and group 3, posterior-shift (P-shift) group, CrSVA-H < -40 mm. After analyzing the correlation between CrSVA-H, pelvic tilt (PT), and LE parameters, the cutoff PT and PT/pelvic incidence (PI) values that correlated with the presence of LE compensation were determined. Previously published data from asymptomatic volunteers were used as a baseline threshold (sacrofemoral angle [SFA] > 217.0° and knee flexion angle [KA] > 11.0°). Among the hip, knee, and ankle, only KA showed a significant increase in the A-shift group compared to the other two groups (p < 0.01). With a wide threshold (SFA > 208.0° and KA > 5.0°), 84.9% of the A-shift group showed LE compensation (hip or knee or both), which was a significantly greater percentage than those in the balanced and P-shift groups (48.4% and 51.9%, p < 0.01). With a narrow threshold (SFA > 217.0° and KA > 11.0°), 62.2% of the A-shift group showed any LE compensation, which was also a higher percentage than the other two groups. The CrSVA-H was moderately correlated with KA (r = 0.502), but had no correlation with PT, SFA, and ankle dorsiflexion angle (AA). PT showed a moderate/strong correlation with SFA, KA, and AA (r = 0.846, 0.624, and 0.622, respectively). With receiver operating characteristic curves, the authors determined that a 23.0° PT with PT/PI > 0.46 predicts the presence of any type of LE compensation with use of the wide threshold. ASD patients with increased CrSVA-H, which represents cranio-hip anterior imbalance, demonstrated a higher prevalence of LE compensation, especially knee flexion, compared to those with neutral and posterior shift of CrSVA. PT represents the extent of LE compensation in patients with spinal sagittal malalignment. Using the cutoff value of PT determined in this study, surgeons can preoperatively estimate the extent of LE compensation without obtaining a full-body radiograph.

Relationship of sagittal spinal alignment with low back pain and physical performance in the general population

Studies have suggested a relationship between sagittal spinal malalignment and low back pain (LBP). The current study investigated the relationship of spinal alignment with LBP and physical performance in 1491 individuals who attended the second follow-up visit of the Wakayama Spine Study. The sagittal vertical axis at C7 (C7 SVA) was measured by a spine surgeon. The occurrence of LBP within one month, pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and physical performance (grip strength, 6-m walking time, chair stand test, one-leg standing test) were also evaluated. LBP in the previous month was determined using ODI, and indicators of physical performance were measured. The mean C7 SVA was 11.0 ± 42.7 mm and was significantly greater in older participants (p < 0.001). LBP was more prevalent in participants with a greater C7 SVA (< 40 mm, 35.7%; 40–95 mm, 47.3%; ≥ 95 mm, 59.4%; p < 0.001) and those with a higher ODI score (10.0%, 17.5%, and 29.4%, respectively; p < 0.001). Physical performance significantly decreased in participants with a greater C7 SVA (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that LBP and physical performance were significantly associated with C7 SVA (p < 0.001). Thus, sagittal spinal malalignment may lead to LBP and decreased physical performance.