Spinal Radiosurgery Research Articles

Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery Provides Long-Term Local Control and Overall Survival for Benign Intradural Tumors.

The role of radiosurgery in the treatment of benign intracranial tumors is well established. However, there are limited long-term follow-up studies on outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign intradural spinal tumors. In this article, we report a large single-institution experience in using SRS to treat patients with benign intradural tumors of the spine. Overall, 184 patients (55% female) and 207 benign intradural tumors were treated. The median patient age was 52 years (range: 19-93). Tumor histology included schwannoma (38%), meningioma (15%), neurofibroma (21%), hemangioma (9%), hemangioblastoma (8%), hemangiopericytoma (5%), and paraganglioma (4%). Thirty-four (16%) lesions underwent resection before radiosurgery. Twenty-three (11%) lesions were NF1-mutated. The median single-fraction margin dose was 14 Gy (range: 11-20), and the median multifraction margin dose was 21 Gy (range: 15-30). The median follow-up was 63 months (range: 1-258). At last follow-up, tumors volumetrically regressed (15%), remained stable (77%), or locally progressed (8%, median: 20 months [range: 3-161]) after SRS. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year local control rates were 97%, 92%, and 90%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the absence of the NF1 mutation (P = .004, hazard ratio: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.63) and single-fraction SRS (P = .007, hazard ratio: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08-0.68) correlated with improved local control. The median overall survival was 251 months (range: 1-258), and 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 95%, 85%, and 70%, respectively. For patients with pre-existing symptoms, tumor-associated pain and neurological deficits were noted to improve or remain stable in 85% and 87% of cases, respectively. Adverse radiation effects included delayed myelopathy (1%), acute pain flare (9%), dermatitis (0.5%), dysphagia (0.5%), and dysphonia (0.5%). With long-term follow-up, spine radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment for benign intradural tumors. In carefully selected patients, even with an NF1 mutation, SRS is associated with a high likelihood of local tumor control.

Commentary: Effective and Successful Control of Symptomatic Vertebral Hemangiomas With Epidural Extension Using Stereotactic Spine Radiosurgery.

Commentary: Effective and Successful Control of Symptomatic Vertebral Hemangiomas With Epidural Extension Using Stereotactic Spine Radiosurgery.

Effective and Successful Control of Symptomatic Vertebral Hemangiomas With Epidural Extension Using Stereotactic Spine Radiosurgery.

We present our experience in the management of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas with epidural extension (SVHEE) using spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of all SVHEE patients treated with SSRS at our institution (2007-2022) was performed. Baseline patient demographics, clinical presentation, lesion volume, and Bilsky grade (to directly evaluate the epidural component) were determined. Clinical and radiographic response and treatment outcomes were subsequently evaluated at first (∼6 months) and final follow-up. Fourteen patients with SVHEE underwent SSRS (16-18 Gy/1-fraction); the mean follow-up was 24 months. The median lesion volume (cc) was 36.9 (range: 7.02-94.1), 31.5 (range: 6.53-69.7), and 25.15 (range: 6.01-52.5) at pre-SSRS, first, and final follow-up, respectively. Overall volume reduction was seen in the last follow-up in all 14 patients, median 29.01% (range: 6.58%-71.58%). Bilsky score was stable or improved in all patients at the last follow-up when compared with pre-SSRS score. Patients who underwent both surgical decompression and SSRS (n = 9): 8 had improved myelopathic symptoms and pain and 1 had stable radiculopathy postintervention. In the 5 patients treated with SSRS monotherapy, 2 had stable radicular pain and the other 3 improved pain and numbness. No patients experienced adverse outcomes. To our knowledge, this represents the largest series of SVHEE patients treated with SSRS, either as monotherapy or part of a multimodal/separation surgery treatment approach. We demonstrate that SSRS represents a potentially safe and effective treatment option in these patients. However, larger prospective studies and longer follow-ups are necessary to further assess the role, durability, and toxicity of SSRS in the management of these patients.

The role of spine stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with breast cancer metastases.

Breast cancer that metastasizes to the spine is associated with low quality of life and poor survival. Radiosurgery has an increasing role in this patient population. This single-institution (2003-2023) study analyzes clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for patients who underwent spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) for metastatic breast cancer. Ninety patients (155 unique breast cancer spinal metastases) were treated with SSRS. The median age was 57years (range: 35-88), and the median KPS was 80 (range: 40-100). Forty-two (27%) lesions were managed surgically prior to radiosurgery. At SSRS, 75 (48%) lesions impinged or compressed the spinal cord per the epidural spinal cord scale (ESCC). Seventy-nine (51%) lesions were categorized as potentially unstable or unstable by the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). The median follow-up was 15months (range: 1-183). The median single-session tumor volume was 25.4cc (range: 2-197), and the median single-fraction prescription dose was 17Gy (range: 12-25). Seven (5%) lesions locally progressed. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year local control rates were 98%, 97%, and 92%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) for the cohort was 32months (range: 2-183). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 72%, 53%, and 30%, respectively. On univariate analysis, KPS ≥ 80 (p = 0.009, HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.84) was associated with improved OS. Patient-reported pain improved (68%), remained stable (29%), or worsened (3%) following radiosurgery. Fifteen (10%) radiation-induced toxicities were reported. Spinal radiosurgery is a safe and highly effective long-term treatment modality for metastases to the spine that originate from breast cancer.

Evaluation of Clinical Risk according to Multi-Leaf Collimator Positioning Error in Spinal Radiosurgery

Evaluation of Clinical Risk according to Multi-Leaf Collimator Positioning Error in Spinal Radiosurgery

Multi-Institutional Validation of the Recursive Partitioning Analysis for Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Spine Radiosurgery for Spine Metastasis

The recently published spine radiosurgery (sSRS) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for overall survival (OS) separated patients into 3 distinct prognostic groups. We sought to externally validate this RPA using 3 separate multi-institutional datasets. A total of 444 patients were utilized to develop the recently published sSRS RPA predictive of OS in patients with spine metastases. The RPA identified three distinct prognostic classes. RPA Class 1 was defined as KPS >70 and controlled systemic disease (n = 142); RPA Class 2 was defined as KPS>70 with uncontrolled systemic disease or KPS ≤70, age ≥54 and absence of visceral metastases (n = 207); RPA Class 3 was defined as KPS ≤70 and age <54 years or KPS≤70, age ≥54 years and presence of visceral metastases (n = 95). We utilized data from 3 large tertiary care centers to independently validate this RPA. Data from each institution was utilized independently to validate the RPA to minimize confounding based on institutional differences in patient selection. A total of 1,184 patients (221 patients from institution A, 749 institution B, and 214 from institution C) were in the validation cohort and were divided based on their RPA Class. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and log-rank test was used to compare OS between RPA classes. In each of the validation cohorts, the median OS was 19.9 months (institution A), 11.0 months (institution B), and 24.4 months (institution C). The patient distribution into RPA classification based on Institution A/B/C was, Class 1 (19.4%, 15.1%, 50.5%), Class 2 (74.7%, 57.7%%, 37.9%), and Class 3 (5.9%, 27.2%%, 11.2%), respectively. The median OS for patients in the validation cohort at Institution A/B/C based on RPA class was Class 1 (54 months, 27.1 months, 50.0 months), Class 2 (15.9 months, 13.0 months, 15.1 months) and Class 3 (6.9 months, 3.5 months, 6.1 months), respectively. Patients in RPA Class 1 had a significantly better OS compared to those in Class 2 of the each of the three external institution validation cohorts (p<0.01). Similarly, patients in RPA Class 2 had a significantly better OS compared to those in Class 3 (p<0.01). The external datasets from three large institutions independently validated the spine SRS RPA successfully for OS in patients undergoing sSRS for spinal metastases. This is the first RPA for OS to have been externally validated using multiple large datasets. Based on this validation, upfront spine SRS is strongly supported for patients in RPA Class 1 and Class 2 and is also cost effective with median OS >11 months for these patients. Patients in RPA Class 3 would benefit most from upfront conventional radiotherapy given their poor expected survival. Given successful external validation, this RPA helps guide physicians to identify those patients with spinal metastases who most benefit from sSRS.

Validation of the Prognostic Index for Spine Metastasis (PRISM) Score for Stratifying Survival in Patients Treated with Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Stereotactic spinal radiosurgery (SSRS) has been increasingly utilized as a first-line treatment for the management of spine metastases due to its ability to prolong survival and improve symptom control. Studies have shown that SSRS is helpful for select patients; however, there is no universal scoring system utilized to predict patient response to treatment. The Prognostic Index for Spinal Metastases (PRISM) score was shown to predict the likelihood of patients benefiting from SSRS. We sought to further demonstrate its generalizability by performing validation with a large dataset from a second high-volume institution. We performed a retrospective review from 2017-2019 of 424 patients treated with SSRS at a single institution. Patients were stratified on the previously described PRISM criteria: Female sex (+2), solitary bone disease (+3), performance status (0 through +3.5), prior surgery at the SSRS site (+1), number of other metastatic sites (-N), prior radiation at the SSRS site (-1), and latency to treatment ≥ 5 months (+3). Patients were grouped based on PRISM scores: >7, Group 1; 4-7, Group 2; 1-3, Group 3; <1 Group 4. There were 89, 188, 88, and 59 patients in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Most patients were male (70%) with a performance status of 0 (53%). The most common tumor histologies were prostate (34%), renal (18%), and lung (11%). The median biological effective dose (BED10) was 60 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 60-82). We performed Cox proportional hazards analysis on overall survival (OS) based on PRISM score and patient and tumor characteristics. Concordance indices created from PRISM criteria and the multivariate Cox proportional analysis were compared. The median follow-up time was 50.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.8-54.7) with a median overall survival of 30.3 months (95% CI, 27.3-38.4). The median overall survivals for PRISM Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 57.1, 37, 23.7, and 8.8 months, respectively. There were significant differences in overall survival among PRISM groups with hazard ratios of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.35-0.69; P<0.001) for Group 1, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.91); P<0.007) for Group 2, 1,45 (95% CI, 1.08-1.94); P = 0.010) for Group 3, and 3.47 (95% CI, 2.56-4.70; P<0.001) for Group 4. Multivariable Cox analysis for patient and tumor characteristics revealed only the number of organs involved and performance status as significant clinicopathologic prognostic attributes. However, the C-index using the PRISM criteria was 0.76, which was superior to the C-index when using the significant clinicopathologic attributes by themselves (0.71). These data demonstrate robust validation of the PRISM score to stratify OS in patients treated with SSRS and may help guide optimal treatment selection in prospective trials and clinical settings.

Morbidity of single-fraction spine radiosurgery for metastatic disease.

e24116 Background: The optimal management of metastatic spine disease involves radiation therapy, with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) utilization having increased in adoption while proving to be efficacious and safe. Spine SRS morbidity (fatigue, dermatitis, nausea and esophagitis) is generally mild and depends on the spinal vertebral level(s) treated. More severe adverse events such as vertebral compression fracture (VCF), radiation-induced myelopathy, and tracheoesophageal (TE) fistula have been documented. The potential benefits of single-fraction SRS (sfSRS) over multi-fraction SRS include increased patient convenience, decreased financial toxicity, and increased treatment completion rates. These benefits may potentially be overshadowed by the morbidity of sfSRS versus multifraction SRS. In this analysis, we perform the first comprehensive examination of sfSRS morbidity in the treatment of spinal lesions. Methods: An extensive search of the PubMed database was undertaken through 2/2/23 to find studies examining spinal sfSRS. Search parameters included the terms “single-fraction, spine, radiation SRS OR SBRT” Articles including multi-fractionated regimens only, reviewed sites outside of the spine, or did not report on clinical outcomes/toxicities were excluded. Results: 17 articles met initial inclusion criteria; 9 were added from references for a total of 26 articles comprising at least 2,699 patients (one study reported the number of tumors, not patients). Dose ranges for single-fraction SRS were 8-26 Gy. Commonly noted toxicities were fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and dermatitis which were no worse than moderate/minimal, not requiring invasive intervention. The overall rate of VCF was 16.2%, with an increased propensity at &gt;20 Gy. The proportion of reported segments requiring surgical intervention (operative stabilization, vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty) for VCF after single-fraction SRS was 20.2% (33/163). The rate of TE fistula at 25 Gy was 8.3%, with an overall rate (dose range = 10-28 Gy) of 1.3% with up to 12-years of follow-up. In patients receiving median dose of 24 Gy, the rate of severe esophagitis was 6.8%, myositis was 1.3% (at 1-year) and 8.3% (at 5-years). The rate of peripheral nervous system injury was 2.5% (at 18-26 Gy) and pain flare was 8% (at 16-24 Gy). The rate of ureteral and esophageal stricture was 1.9% each in patients receiving 12-24 Gy. Conclusions: VCF is the most commonly reported severe adverse events with single-fraction spine SRS, particularly for doses &gt; 20 Gy. 80% of VCFs can be successfully managed without invasive intervention. Other severe adverse events are rare – particularly for &lt; 20 Gy – but require post-SRS monitoring to expediently and efficiently intervene if necessary. These findings indicate that single-fraction spine SRS to &lt; 20 Gy is safe with minimal morbidity. Further study regarding the efficacy of such dosing is being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Vertebral Metastases of the Spine

Spine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control. To assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases. In this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020. Patients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below. The primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord. A total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, -19 percentage points; 95% CI, -32.9 to -5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months. In this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974.

Safety and efficacy of salvage conventional re-irradiation following stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases.

There has been limited work assessing the use of re-irradiation (re-RT) for local failure following stereotactic spinal radiosurgery (SSRS). We reviewed our institutional experience of conventionally-fractionated external beam radiation (cEBRT) for salvage therapy following SSRS local failure. We performed a retrospective review of 54 patients that underwent salvage conventional re-RT at previously SSRS-treated sites. Local control following re-RT was defined as the absence of progression at the treated site as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Competing risk analysis for local failure was performed using a Fine-Gray model. The median follow-up time was 25 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-24.9 months) following cEBRT re-RT. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed Karnofsky performance score prior to re-RT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; p = 0.003) and time to local failure (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00; p = 0.04) were associated with longer OS, while male sex (HR = 3.92; 95% CI, 1.64-9.33; p = 0.002) was associated with shorter OS. Local control at 12 months was 81% (95% CI, 69.3-94.0). Competing risk multivariable regression revealed radioresistant tumors (subhazard ratio [subHR] = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.90; p = 0.028) and epidural disease (subHR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.78; p =0.013) were associated with increased risk of local failure. At 12 months, 91% of patients maintained ambulatory function. Our data suggest that cEBRT following SSRS local failure can be used safely and effectively. Further investigation is needed into optimal patient selection for cEBRT in the retreatment setting.

Trends in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial and Spinal Pathologies: Analysis of the Top 100 Most Cited Articles.

There is a plethora of papers on the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in various benign and malignant intracranial tumors, and it is possible to overlook the most important and landmark studies. Thus, the necessity of citation analysis arises, which reviews the most cited articles and recognizes the impact made by these articles. Utilizing the 100 most cited articles describing the use of SRS for intracranial and spinal pathologies, this article aims to provide meaningful information regarding the historical trends and recent directions in which this field is headed. We performed a search of the Web of Science database using the keywords "stereotactic radiosurgery," "gamma knife," "GKRS," "gamma knife radiosurgery," "LINAC," and "Cyberknife" on May 14, 2022. Our search retrieved a total of 30,652 articles published between the years 1968 and 2017. The top 100 cited articles were arranged in descending order based on citation count (CC) and citation per year (CY). The journal with the largest number of publications as well as citation count was the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (n = 33), followed by Journal of Neurosurgery (n = 25). The most cited article was authored by Andrews, which was published in 2004 in The Lancet (1699 CC, 89.42 CY). Flickinger, with 25 papers and 7635 total citations, was the author with the highest impact. Lunsford, with 25 publications and total citations of 7615, was a close second. The USA was the leading country with the maximum number of total citations (n = 23,054). Ninety-two articles described the use of SRS for intracranial pathologies (metastases, n = 38; AVM, n = 16; vestibular schwannoma, n = 9; meningioma, n = 8; trigeminal neuralgia, n = 6; sellar lesion, n = 2; glioma, n = 2; functional, n = 1; and procedure related, n = 10). Eight studies describing spinal radiosurgery were included, out of which four were on spinal metastases. Citation analyses of the top 100 articles revealed that the focus of research in the field of SRS started with functional neurosurgery and progressed to benign intracranial tumors and AVMs. More recently, central nervous system (CNS) metastases have received the maximum attention with 38 articles, including 14 randomized controlled trials finding a place in the top 100 cited articles. Presently, the use of SRS is concentrated in developed countries. Efforts need to be made for more widespread use in developing nations to bring the maximum possible benefits of this focused noninvasive treatment to a wider population.

A quantitative and comparative evaluation of stereotactic spine radiosurgery local control: proposing a consistent measurement methodology.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal treatment modality used in the management of metastatic spine tumors. Multiple studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy for pain and tumor control. However, no uniform quantitative imaging methodology exists to evaluate response to treatment in these patients. This study presents radiographic local control rates post-SBRT, systematically compares measurements acquired according to WHO and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and explores the relationship to patient outcome. The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively obtained data from a cohort of 59 consecutive patients (81 metastatic isocenters) treated with SBRT and followed with serial MRI scans. Measurements were performed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the patients' clinical course. Local control status was determined according to both WHO and RECIST measurements, and agreement between the measuring methodologies was calculated and reported. Eighty-one isocenters (111 vertebral bodies) were treated with SBRT. The mean treatment dose was 13.96 Gy and the median follow-up duration was 10.8 months, during which 408 MRI scans were evaluated with both WHO and RECIST criteria for each scan point. Imaging demonstrated a mean unidimensional size decrease of 0.2 cm (p = 0.14) and a mean area size decrease of 0.99 cm2 (p = 0.03). Although 88% of the case classifications were concordant and the agreement was significant, WHO criteria were found to be more sensitive to tumor size change. The local control rates according to WHO and RECIST were 95% and 98%, respectively. Although WHO volumetric measurements are admittedly superior for tumor size measurement, RECIST is simpler, reproducible, and for the first time is shown here to be comparable to WHO criteria. Thus, the application of RECIST methodology appears to be a suitable standard for evaluating post-SBRT treatment response. Moreover, using comprehensive and consistent measuring approaches, this study substantiates the efficacy of SBRT in the treatment of spine metastases.

Multi-Institutional Datasets Validate the Recursive Partitioning Analysis for Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Spine Radiosurgery for Spine Metastasis

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> The recently published spine radiosurgery (sSRS) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for overall survival (OS) separated patients into 3 distinct prognostic groups. We sought to externally validate this RPA using a multi-institutional dataset. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> A total of 444 patients were utilized to develop the recently published sSRS RPA predictive of OS in patients with spine metastases. The RPA identified three distinct prognostic classes. RPA Class 1 was defined as KPS >70 and controlled systemic disease (n=142); RPA Class 2 was defined as KPS>70 with uncontrolled systemic disease or KPS ≤70, age ≥54 and absence of visceral metastases (n=207); RPA Class 3 was defined as KPS ≤70 and age <54 years or KPS≤70, age ≥54 years and presence of visceral metastases (n=95). We utilized data from large tertiary care centers to validate this RPA. A total of 749 patients were in the validation cohort and were divided based on their RPA Class. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and log-rank test was used to compare OS between RPA classes. <h3>Results</h3> In the validation cohort (749 patients), the median OS was 11.0 months. One-hundred-thirteen (15.1%) patients were in RPA Class 1, 432 (57.7%) patients in RPA Class 2 and 204 (27.2%) patients in RPA Class 3. The median OS in the validation cohort based on RPA Class was 27.1 months for Class 1, 13.0 months for Class 2 and 3.5 months for Class 3. Patients in RPA Class 1 had a significantly better OS compared to those in Class 2 of the validation cohort (p<0.01). Similarly, patients in RPA Class 2 had a significantly better OS compared to those in Class 3 (p<0.01). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The external datasets from two large centers validated the spine SRS RPA successfully for RPA for OS for patients undergoing sSRS for spinal metastases. This is the first RPA for OS to have been externally validated using a large dataset. Based on this validation, upfront spine SRS is strongly supported for patients in RPA Class 1. Upfront SRS is also supported for RPA Class 2 patients. Patients in RPA Class 3 would benefit most from upfront conventional radiotherapy given their poor expected survival. Given successful external validation, this RPA helps guide physicians to identify those patients with spinal metastases who most benefit from sSRS.

Personal experience in intramedullary lesions, in adults

Background: Intramedullary spinal cord lesions (IMSCL) although they are rare, it generates invasion and destruction of the spinal cord. Such lesions must be diagnosed as early as possible, some have histological and genetic aggressiveness, generating severe functional neurological damage.&#x0D; Objective: To identify the optimal strategy for diagnosis and treatment in IMSC, to improve prognosis.&#x0D; Methods: A retrospective clinical study from 2001 to 2021, was performed on 33 adult patients (18 women, 15 men), diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging with IMSCT. The most common topography was: thoracic 27 cases disposed between T2-T12, cervical 6 cases disposed between C2-C6, lumbar 2 cases at L1-L2. The most frequent symptoms in my cases were: unilateral radicular pain related to the tumour topography or bilateral diffuse burning pain, especially during the night; back and neck stiffness; paresthesia, motor disturbances with an ASIA score of 2-4, and severe atrophy especially in cervical topography, ataxia, initial retention, impotence and later loss of bowel and bladder function with incontinence. All patients were operated by the same senior neurosurgeon with at least 6 months of follow-up postoperatively. For functional outcome, the most important predictors are the preoperative neurological grade, and the high-grade IMSCT generating recurrence and reoperations.&#x0D; Results: The patients addressed the clinic for pain and neurological deficits; the topography of the intramedullary lesion was confirmed by MRI native / with contrast, ultrasonography, and spinal arteriography. Several histologic entities were recorded: ependymomas - 12 cases, astrocytomas - 8 cases, hemangioblastomas - 3 cases, cavernomas - 6 cases, metastases - 2 cases, germ cell tumour - 1 case, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour - 1 case. Gross total excision was performed in 25 cases, with no mortality. In eight cases recurrences were recorded requiring the resumption of surgical treatment. In all cases physiotherapy-rehabilitation approach was used, and the outcome was correlated with pre-operatory motor deficits severity, 3 patients with thoracic high-grade astrocytoma underwent stereotactic spine radiosurgery (SSR) with Cyberknife abroad, stopping tumour growth one year after.&#x0D; Conclusions: Intramedullary spinal cord lesions (IMSCL) are rare conditions, and MRI development allows an early diagnosis of these tumours. To adequately counselled patients, with minor preoperative deficits, real expectations concerning the functional outcomes, in benign tumours, and even anatomical healing should be based still on refinements of radical surgical excision. Actual radiotherapy techniques should be used in aggressive tumours.

Evaluation of a Dedicated Software "Elements™ Spine SRS, Brainlab®" for Target Volume Definition in the Treatment of Spinal Bone Metastases With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

IntroductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for spine metastases. The International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC) has published consensus guidelines for target delineation in spine SBRT. A new software called Elements™ Spine SRS by Brainlab® that includes the module Elements SmartBrush Spine (v3.0, Munich, Germany) has been developed specifically for SBRT treatment of spine metastases, and the latter provides the ability to perform semiautomatic clinical target volume (CTV) generation based on gross tumor volume (GTV) localization and guidelines. The aims of our study were to evaluate this software by studying differences in volumes between semiautomatic CTV contours compared to manual contouring performed by an expert radiation oncologist and to determine the dosimetric impact of these differences on treatment plans.MethodsA total of 35 volumes (“Expert GTV” and “Expert CTV”) from 30 patients were defined by a single expert. A semiautomatic definition of these 35 CTVs based on the location of “Expert GTV” and following ISRC guidelines was also performed in Elements SmartBrush Spine (“Brainlab CTV”). The spatial overlap between “Brainlab” and “Expert” CTVs was calculated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). We considered a threshold of 0.80 or above to indicate that Elements SmartBrush Spine performed very well with adequate contours for clinical use. Two dosimetric treatment plans, each corresponding to a specific planning target volume (PTV; Expert PTV, Brainlab PTV), were created for 11 patients.ResultsWe showed that “Brainlab CTV” and “Expert CTV” mean volumes were 29.8 ± 16.1 and 28.7 ± 15.7 cm3, respectively (p = 0.23). We also showed that the mean DSC for semiautomatic contouring relative to expert manual contouring was 0.85 ± 0.08 and less than 0.80 in five cases. For metastases involving the vertebral body only (n = 13,37%), the mean DSC was 0.90 ± 0.03, and for ones involving other or several vertebral regions (n = 22.63%), the mean DSC was 0.81 ± 0.08 (p < 0.001). The comparison of dosimetric treatment plans was performed for equivalent PTV coverage. There were no differences between doses received by organs at risk (spinal cord and esophagus) for Expert and Brainlab PTVs, respectively.ConclusionThe results showed that the semiautomatic method had quite good accuracy and can be used in clinical routine even for complex lesions.

Accuracy evaluation of real-time body surface imaging guided system in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery: a phantom study

Accuracy evaluation of real-time body surface imaging guided system in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery: a phantom study

Clinical Evaluation of an Auto-Segmentation Tool for Spine SBRT Treatment

PurposeSpine SBRT target delineation is time-consuming due to the complex bone structure. Recently, Elements SmartBrush Spine (ESS) was developed by Brainlab to automatically generate a clinical target volume (CTV) based on gross tumor volume (GTV). The aim of this project is to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of ESS auto-segmentation.MethodsTwenty spine SBRT patients with 21 target sites treated at our institution were used for this retrospective comparison study. Planning CT/MRI images and physician-drawn GTVs were inputs for ESS. ESS can automatically segment the vertebra, split the vertebra into 6 sectors, and generate a CTV based on the GTV location, according to the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC) Consensus guidelines. The auto-segmented CTV can be edited by including/excluding sectors of the vertebra, if necessary. The ESS-generated CTV contour was then compared to the clinically used CTV using qualitative and quantitative methods. The CTV contours were compared using visual assessment by the clinicians, relative volume differences (RVD), distance of center of mass (DCM), and three other common contour similarity measurements such as dice similarity coefficient (DICE), Hausdorff distance (HD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95).ResultsQualitatively, the study showed that ESS can segment vertebra more accurately and consistently than humans at normal curvature conditions. The accuracy of CTV delineation can be improved significantly if the auto-segmentation is used as the first step. Conversely, ESS may mistakenly split or join different vertebrae when large curvatures in anatomy exist. In this study, human interactions were needed in 7 of 21 cases to generate the final CTVs by including/excluding sectors of the vertebra. In 90% of cases, the RVD were within ±15%. The RVD, DCM, DICE, HD, and HD95 for the 21 cases were 3% ± 12%, 1.9 ± 1.5 mm, 0.86 ± 0.06, 13.34 ± 7.47 mm, and 4.67 ± 2.21 mm, respectively.ConclusionESS can auto-segment a CTV quickly and accurately and has a good agreement with clinically used CTV. Inter-person variation and contouring time can be reduced with ESS. Physician editing is needed for some occasions. Our study supports the idea of using ESS as the first step for spine SBRT target delineation to improve the contouring consistency as well as to reduce the contouring time.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for bone oligometastases

About 60–90% of cancer patients are estimated to develop bone metastases, particularly in the spine.Bone scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT ) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ) are currently used to assess metastatic bone disease; positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT ) has become more widespread in clinical practice because of its high sensitivity and specificity with about 95% diagnostic accuracy. The most common and well-known radiotracer is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG); several other PET-radiotracers are currently under investigation for different solid tumors, such as 11C or 18FDG-choline and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT for prostate cancer. In treatment planning, standard and investigational imaging modalities should be registered with the planning CT so as to best define the bone target volume. For target volume delineation of spine metastases, the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC ) of North American experts provided consensus guidelines. Single fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) doses ranged from 12 to 24 Gy; fractionated SRT administered 21–27 Gy in 3 fractions or 20–35 Gy in 5 fractions. After spine SRT, less than 5% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity. Late toxicity included the extremely rare radiation-induced myelopathy and a 14% risk of de novo vertebral compression fractures.

Efficacy of an Esophageal Spacer for Spine Radiosurgery: First Experience

This is the first study to investigate the use of an esophageal hydrogel spacer in spine stereotactic radiosurgery. The tolerability and the dose reduction to the esophagus are predicted to reduce the incidence of high-grade toxicities, which in turn can permit dose escalation to optimize tumor control.

Plan quality and consistency in spine radiosurgery treatment planning: comparison between automatic treatment planning with Elements Spine SRS and manual inverse planning with Varian Eclipse.

Spine radiosurgery treatment planning can be a challenging task since a high radiation dose is delivered to target volumes close to the spinal cord, therefore a steep dose gradient is required. Plan quality is greatly influenced by the planner skills, so automatic treatment planning has been proposed to overcome this issue and assure high-quality plans. The Brainlab Elements Spine SRS treatment planning system is specially designed for spine radiosurgery treatments. It is an automatic treatment planning system that works through predefined protocols, with minimal planner interaction required. In this work, we evaluated the plan quality and consistency among the planners within the same institution when using the Elements Spine SRS compared to manual inverse planning with the Varian Eclipse system. Six planners produced a plan for 3 sample target volumes representing different spine metastases in the thoracic region using both treatment planning systems. Dose prescription was 16 Gy in a single fraction, at more than 80% of the target volume. The most important organ at risk was the spinal canal. The dose constraint was V10 Gy < 0.35 cm3. High dose spillage outside the target volume, the homogeneity index, the Paddick conformity index and the number of monitor units were also evaluated. The mean dose to the target volumes in the Elements Spine SRS plans were consistently higher by 0.8 Gy to 1.5 Gy and the maximum dose to the target volumes were consistently higher by 1.8 Gy to 3.1 Gy. Spinal cord sparing was comparable to the Eclipse plans. However, the number of monitor units was greatly reduced, up to 2270 monitor units less. No difference was found in plan quality variability among the planners.