Sphingosine 1-phosphate Receptor Modulator Research Articles

Fingolimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, prevents neonatal bronchopulmonary dysplasia and subsequent airway remodeling in a murine model.

Neonatal bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is associated with alveolar simplification and airway remodeling. Airway remodeling leads to deformation of airways characterized by peribronchial collagen deposition and hypertrophy of airway smooth muscle, which contribute to the narrowing of airways. Poorly developed lungs contribute to reduced lung function that deteriorates with the passage of time. We have earlier shown that sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK 1)/sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor1 (S1PR1) signaling plays a role in the pathogenesis of BPD. In this study, we investigated the role of fingolimod or FTY720, a known S1PR1 modulator approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis in the treatment of BPD. Fingolimod promotes the degradation of S1PR1 by preventing its recycling, thus serving as the equivalent of an inhibitor. Exposure of neonatal mice to hyperoxia enhanced the expression of S1PR1 in both airways and alveoli as compared with normoxia. This increased expression of S1PR1 in the airways persisted into adulthood, accompanied by airway remodeling and airway hyperreactivity (AHR) after neonatal hyperoxia. Intranasal fingolimod at a much lower dose compared with the intraperitoneal route of administration during neonatal hyperoxia improved alveolarization in neonates and reduced airway remodeling and AHR in adult mice associated with improved lung function. The intranasal route was not associated with the lymphopenia seen with the intraperitoneal route of administration of the drug. An increase in S1PR1 expression in the airways was associated with an increase in the expression of enzyme lysyl oxidase (LOX) in the airways following hyperoxia, which was suppressed by fingolimod. This association warrants further investigation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The role of the S1P receptor1 modulator, fingolimod, as an FDA-approved drug in preventing the recurrence of multiple sclerosis is established. Fingolimod prevented bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and its sequela of airway remodeling in a neonatal murine model. This protection was associated with the downregulation of lysyl oxidase signaling pathway. Fingolimod could be repurposed for the therapy of BPD.

Ozanimod: A Review in Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.

Ozanimod (Zeposia®), an orally administered sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator (S1PRM) that is selective for the S1P1 and S1P5 receptor subtypes, is approved in the USA for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). In pivotal phase III clinical trials in patients with RMS, ozanimod significantly reduced annualised relapse rates and the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and was associated with reduced brain volume loss, compared with interferon (IFN)-β1a. However, there were no significant differences in 3- and 6-month disability progression between the groups. Ozanimod was generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse reactions including upper respiratory tract infection and hepatic transaminase elevation. Efficacy and tolerability were sustained over more than 6 years with continued treatment. S1PRM-related adverse events seen with ozanimod are generally manageable with screening and/or monitoring. Notably, ozanimod does not require first-dose cardiac monitoring in the USA. In conclusion, ozanimod is a valuable once-daily oral disease-modifying therapy that extends the available treatment options for patients with RMS.

Challenges in Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia under Ocrelizumab and De-Risking Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis—The Elephant Is (Still) in the Room

Severe SARS-CoV-2 infections may still be observed in people bearing risk factors, such as the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which are adopted in several autoimmune disorders including multiple sclerosis (MS). COVID-19 diagnosis is routinely based on nasopharyngeal swab testing, but suboptimal sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may lead to misdiagnosis in some cases. Such diagnostic issues were described in a few MS patients receiving anti-CD20 mAbs, including middle-aged people and lacking information on subsequent MS therapeutic management, a debated topic as no evidence-based guidance on de-risking strategies is currently available. Here, we report the case of a young MS patient who developed severe COVID-19 pneumonia under treatment with the anti-CD20 mAb ocrelizumab, and who was finally diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 by BAL despite repeatedly negative nasopharyngeal swabs. Ocrelizumab was then discontinued, and treatment with a sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulator was started, followed by maintenance of clinical and radiological MS stability. Challenges in diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia in people without risk factors other than immunomodulatory treatment are hence discussed, as well as potential strategies for de-risking MS therapies. The latter topic is increasingly debated based on raising concerns for potential long-term safety issues of high-efficacy treatments, including anti-CD20 mAbs.

Safety and efficacy of S1P receptor modulators for the induction and maintenance phases in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly affects quality of life. Conventional treatments have had limited success. this study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PrMs) as a potential treatment for IBD. We conducted a thorough search of published literature on PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2023. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a target population comprising of IBD patients receiving either S1PrMs or placebo and a comparison of the 2. The statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan (version 5.4). Forest plots presented the results as risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. A total of 7 RCTs involving 2471 patients were included. The results were reported for both the induction and maintenance phases of treatment. in the induction phase, the intervention group proved to have a significantly higher incidence of histological remission (RR = 2.67; 95% CI [1.97, 3.60]; P < .00001), endoscopic improvement (RR = 2.06; 95% CI [1.66, 2.56]; P < .00001), clinical remission (RR = 2.23; 95% CI [1.43, 3.46]; P < .0004) and clinical response (RR = 1.37; 95% CI [1.01, 1.84]; P = .04) compared to the placebo group. Outcomes assessed in maintenance phase significantly favored the intervention group over placebo as well, histologic remission (RR = 2.39; 95% CI [1.83, 3.11]; P < .00001), endoscopic improvement (RR = 2.20; 95% CI [1.28, 3.77]; P = .004), clinical remission (RR = 3.03; 95% CI [1.84, 4.99]; P < .0001), and clinical response (RR = 1.74; 95% CI [1.25, 2.42]; P = .001). S1PrMs show promising potential for establishing histologic remission, endoscopic improvement, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission. With more studies and clinical trials, these modulators may become a reliable therapeutic choice for UC patients everywhere.

Efficacy and Safety of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) are an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This review summarizes all available randomized trial data on the efficacy and safety of S1PRM therapy. Multiple publication databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults with moderate to severe UC treated with S1PRMs. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and the overall quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We identified 7 RCTs (1737 patients) involving the use of S1PRMs for moderate to severe UC. During induction, S1PRM therapy was efficacious when compared with placebo for clinical remission [RR: 2.65 (95% CI: 2.00, 3.53)], clinical response [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48, 1.91)], endoscopic improvement [RR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.68)], endoscopic normalization [RR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.58, 3.83)], mucosal healing [RR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.94, 4.26)], and histologic remission [RR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.66)]. Similar results were seen throughout the maintenance peroid, although fewer data were available to pool; notably, both sustained [RR: 3.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 10.35)] and steroid-free [RR: 2.92 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.33)] remission were significantly increased by S1PRM. There were no significant differences in adverse events [RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.15)] and infections [RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.60)] between S1PRM and placebo. Pooling of RCT data confirms that S1PRM therapy is both effective and safe for patients with moderate to severe UC.

Presentation and Outcome in S1P-RM and Natalizumab-Associated Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a severe neurologic disease resulting from JC virus reactivation in immunocompromised patients. Certain multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are associated with PML risk, such as natalizumab and, more rarely, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1P-RMs). Although natalizumab-associated PML is well documented, information on S1P-RM-associated PML is limited. The aim of this study is to compare clinical presentations and outcomes between the 2 groups. A retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with PML from 2009 to 2022 treated with S1P-RMs or natalizumab. Data on clinical and radiologic presentation, outcomes, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), survival, disability (using the modified Ranking scale-mRS), and MS relapses post-PML were analyzed. Of 88 patients, 84 were analyzed (20 S1P-RM, 64 natalizumab). S1P-RM-associated PML was diagnosed in older patients (median age 52 vs 44 years, p < 0.001) and after longer treatment duration (median 63.9 vs 40 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, S1P-RM patients were more prone to show symptoms at diagnosis (100 vs 80.6%, p = 0.035), had more disseminated lesions (80% vs 34.9%, p = 0.002), and had higher gadolinium enhancement (65% vs 39.1%, p = 0.042). Natalizumab patients had a higher IRIS development rate (OR: 8.3 [1.92-33.3]). Overall, the outcome (mRS) at 12 months was similar in the 2 groups (OR: 0.81 [0.32-2.0]). Yet, post-treatment MS activity was higher in S1P-RM cases (OR: 5.7 [1.4-22.2]). S1P-RM-associated PML shows reduced IRIS risk but higher post-treatment MS activity. Clinicians should tailor post-PML treatment based on pre-PML medication.

Etrasimod (Velsipity)

CADTH recommends that Velsipity be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) whose disease had an inadequate response or lost response, or who were intolerant, to either conventional therapy or an advanced treatment, if certain conditions are met. Velsipity should only be covered to treat adults with moderately to severely active UC whose disease has had an inadequate response or lost response, or who were intolerant, to either conventional therapy or an advanced treatment provided that it is covered for a similar patient population and in a similar way to other advanced therapies for UC (e.g., biologics, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators, or Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors) currently reimbursed by public drug plans. Velsipity should only be reimbursed if it is prescribed by a physician experienced in the diagnosis and management of UC, if it is not used in combination with other advanced therapies for UC, and if the cost is reduced so that it does not cost the drug programs more than the least costly relevant advanced therapy. A patient’s disease must respond to the treatment in the first 12 weeks of starting Velsipity to continue receiving the drug.

Clinicians' Preferences for Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Multiple Sclerosis Based on Clinical Management Considerations: A Choice Experiment.

Four sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators are currently available in the USA for treating relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). These S1PR modulators have similar efficacy. Clinicians may therefore consider other factors, such as clinical management considerations, when distinguishing among treatments. This study estimated which S1PR modulator clinicians would choose on the basis of a treatment's clinical management and quantified how individual aspects of clinical management might drive this choice. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was conducted on the basis of clinical management preferences elicited in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and real-world clinical management profiles of the S1PR modulators currently available to treat relapsing forms of MS (fingolimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, siponimod). The DCE was completed by neurologists in the USA experienced in treating MS and included eight clinical management attributes: first-dose observations, genotyping, liver function tests, eye exams, drug-drug interactions, interactions with antidepressants, interactions with foods high in tyramine, and immune system recovery time. Attribute levels were selected on the basis of S1PR modulator product labels. In the MCDA, partial MCDA scores were created for each attribute and summed to produce an overall MCDA score for each S1PR modulator. The DCE was completed by 200 neurologists. The overall MCDA score was highest for ponesimod (4.78 points), followed by siponimod (4.10 points), fingolimod (3.61 points), and ozanimod (2.38 points). Having fewer drug-drug interactions contributed most to the overall scores (up to 1.56 points), followed by having no first-dose observations (0.95 points), the shortest immune system recovery time (0.94 points), and not interacting with foods high in tyramine (0.86 points). When considering clinical management convenience, the average US-based neurologist treating MS is likely to choose ponesimod over siponimod, fingolimod, or ozanimod. The strongest driver of preferences was the number of drug-drug interactions. This information can help inform recommendations for the treatment of MS and facilitate shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

Small Molecule Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: JAK Inhibitors and S1PR Modulators

Small molecules, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs), are promising new treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Small molecules exhibit more predictable pharmacokinetics than biologics, are less likely to induce immune responses, and can be administered orally. JAK inhibitors function by blocking the activity of JAK enzymes, which prevents the subsequent phosphorylation and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins. Tofacitinib and filgotinib are approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), while upadacitinib is approved for UC and Crohn's disease. Nevertheless, JAK inhibitors can increase the risk of herpes zoster, cancer, major adverse cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolism. S1PRMs bind to S1PRs, particularly S1PR1, on lymphocytes. This interaction inhibits lymphocytes from exiting the lymph nodes and migrating to the gut, thereby reducing inflammation and the immune response in the intestinal mucosa. Ozanimod and etrasimod are S1PRMs approved for the treatment of UC, but they can cause side effects such as bradycardia, conduction disorder, and macular edema. Overall, JAK inhibitors and S1PRMs offer significant benefits in managing IBD, although their potential side effects require careful monitoring.

Surfactant system of the lungs in antiphospholipid syndrome under the conditions of administration of the immunosuppressive agent FTY-720

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombophilic disease in the pathogenesis of which the leading role belongs to antibodies reacting with antigenic determinants of phospholipids. APS is a systemic autoimmune pathology that involves many organs and systems in the pathological process, including the respiratory system. Given the fact that the lung surfactant is mainly represented by phospholipids, it can be presented that the surfactant is damaged and its functioning is impaired in APS. The results of our experiments showed that in antiphospholipid syndrome, there was a decline in the functional activity of the surfactant and a change in its biochemical composition. The introduction of FTY-720 normalized the parameters of the lung surfactant system, which were changed during the modeling of antiphospholipid syndrome. The work shows the effectiveness of the therapy of this autoimmune pathology with immunosuppressor FTY-720, which is a structural analogue of endogenous sphingosine. The effect of the drug is based on the modulation of sphingosine-1 phosphate receptors of lymphocytes. The main effect of the immunosuppressor FTY-720 as a result of receptor interaction is a decrease in the number of circulating lymphocytes. The research involved 85 white random bred male rats: Group 1 (APS modeling) consisted of 30 rats who were intravenously injected with cardiolipin antigen at a total dose of 0.2-0.4 mg per rat every other day for three weeks; Group 2 (control) consisted of 25 rats who were injected with 0.9% NaCl solution according to the same scheme; and Group 3 including 30 rats in which APS was combined with the administration of the immunosuppressive agent FTY-720 (intraperitoneally 1 mg/kg of animal weight). Three weeks later, there was an operation conducted with the purpose of extraction of the bronchopulmonary complex. After extraction of the bronchopulmonary complex, its triple lavage was carried out with 0.9% NaCl solution. The material of the experimental study was a lavage liquid, in which the biophysical and biochemical parameters of the surfactant were studied. Langmuir–Blodgett method was used to identify static, minimal and maximal surface tension. These figures were used to identify integrative indicator reflecting surfactant characteristics – the Clements stability index. The fractional composition of surfactant phospholipids was determined by thin-layer chromatography. The results of our experiments showed that in antiphospholipid syndrome, there was a decline in the functional activity of the surfactant and a change in its biochemical composition. The introduction of FTY-720 normalized the parameters of the lung surfactant system, which were changed during the modeling of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Safety and Effectiveness of Thiopurines and Small Molecules in Elderly Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

The management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) requires weighing an individual patient's therapeutic benefits and therapy-related complication risks. The immunomodulators that have been commonly used so far in IBD therapy are thiopurines, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine. As our understanding of the IBD pathomechanisms is widening, new therapeutic approaches are being introduced, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators' development. Non-selective JAK inhibitors are represented by tofacitinib, while selective JAK inhibitors comprise filgotinib and upadacitinib. As for the S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for UC therapy. The number of elderly patients with IBD is growing; therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the oral immunomodulators among the subjects aged ≥60. Possible complications limit the use of thiopurines in senior patients. Likewise, the promising effectiveness of new drugs in IBD therapy in those with additional risk factors might be confined by the risk of serious adverse events. However, the data regarding this issue are limited.

Clinical effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis stratified by disease-modifying treatment.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with a dampened humoral and/or cellular immune response in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were concurrently on disease-modifying treatment (DMT) with B-cell depleting agents or sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Our main goal was to investigate the impact of these DMT classes on the clinical effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination. Since March 2020, demographics and clinical data of patients with MS who developed COVID-19 have been collected at the Belgian National MS Centre in Melsbroek. Patients were considered to be 'protected by vaccination' if they were (i) fully vaccinated and (ii) tested positive for COVID-19 in the period ranging from 14 days to 6 months after the last administered vaccine. On 19 December 2022, 418 COVID-19 cases were retrospectively identified in 389 individual patients. Hospitalization and mortality rates resulting from the infection were 10.8% and 2.4%, respectively. Being 'unprotected by vaccination' was significantly associated with a worse COVID-19 outcome (i.e., hospitalization and/or death) in the total cohort (N = 418, odds ratio [OR] 3.96), in patients on ongoing DMT other than anti-CD20 agents or S1PRMs (N = 123, OR 31.75) and in patients without DMT (N = 182, OR 5.60), but not in those receiving anti-CD20 agents (N = 91, OR 0.39); the S1PRMs subgroup was considered too small (22 infections) for any meaningful analysis. Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination protects against severe infection in patients with MS but it was not possible to confirm this effect in those on DMT with B-cell depleting agents.

Incidence and determinants of seizures in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

BackgroundSeizures are reported to be more prevalent in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) compared with the general population. Existing data predominantly originate from population-based studies, which introduce variability in methodologies...

Switching disease-modifying therapies from sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators to natalizumab or dimethyl fumarate restores immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate whether switching disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators to either natalizumab (NTZ) or dimethyl fumarate (DMF) could restore the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MethodsThis study included 9 controls and 33 patients with MS: 7 patients treated with DMF, 7 patients treated with NTZ, 9 patients treated with S1P receptor modulators, and 10 patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to DMF or NTZ by the second vaccine dose. The patients who had switched DMTs were classified into two groups, based on whether their lymphocyte counts were above or below 1000/μL at the time of vaccination. In addition, relapses within 6 months after switching DMTs were also evaluated in these patients. Six months after the second dose of the vaccination, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were evaluated in all participants, and spike specific CD4+ T cells were also assessed in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators. ResultsPatients treated with S1P receptor modulators had lower levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies than the controls and patients treated with DMF and NTZ. On the other hand, in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators, a recovery of lymphocyte counts above 1000/µL resulted in restored humoral and cellular immune responses to the vaccination. There were no neurological relapses in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to NTZ. ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is expected to be effective in patients whose lymphocyte counts have recovered due to switching DMTs from S1P receptor modulators. Switching DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to NTZ before vaccination may be beneficial in achieving efficacy for SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, with a reduced risk of relapse.

Re-emergence of T lymphocyte-mediated synaptopathy in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is defined by the irreversible accumulation of disability following a relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) course. Despite treatments advances, a reliable tool able to capture the transition from RRMS to SPMS is lacking. A T cell chimeric MS model demonstrated that T cells derived from relapsing patients exacerbate excitatory transmission of central neurons, a synaptotoxic event absent during remitting stages. We hypothesized the re-emergence of T cell synaptotoxicity during SPMS and investigated the synaptoprotective effects of siponimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator, known to reduce grey matter damage in SPMS patients. Data from healthy controls (HC), SPMS patients, and siponimod-treated SPMS patients were collected. Chimeric experiments were performed incubating human T cells on murine cortico-striatal slices, and recording spontaneous glutamatergic activity from striatal neurons. Homologous chimeric experiments were executed incubating EAE mice T cells with siponimod and specific S1PR agonists or antagonists to identify the receptor involved in siponimod-mediated synaptic recovery. SPMS patient-derived T cells significantly increased the striatal excitatory synaptic transmission (n=40 synapses) compared to HC T cells (n=55 synapses), mimicking the glutamatergic alterations observed in active RRMS-T cells. Siponimod treatment rescued SPMS T cells synaptotoxicity (n=51 synapses). Homologous chimeric experiments highlighted S1P5R involvement in the siponimod's protective effects. Transition from RRMS to SPMS involves the reappearance of T cell-mediated synaptotoxicity. Siponimod counteracts T cell-induced excitotoxicity, emphasizing the significance of inflammatory synaptopathy in progressive MS and its potential as a promising pharmacological target.

FTY720 ameliorates experimental MPO-ANCA-associated vasculitis by regulating fatty acid oxidation via the neutrophil PPARα-CPT1a pathway.

Increasing studies demonstrated the importance of C5a and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-induced neutrophil activation in the pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) acts as a downstream effector molecule of C5a and enhances neutrophil activation induced by C5a and ANCA. The current study investigated the role of a S1P receptor modulator, FTY720, in experimental autoimmune vasculitis (EAV) and explored the immunometabolism-related mechanisms of FTY720 in modulating ANCA-induced neutrophil activation. The effects of FTY720 in EAV were evaluated by quantifying haematuria, proteinuria, crescent formation, tubulointerstitial injury and pulmonary haemorrhage. RNA sequencing of renal cortex and gene enrichment analysis were performed. The proteins of key identified pathways were analysed in neutrophils isolated from peripheral blood of patients with active AAV and normal controls. We assessed the effects of FTY720 on ANCA-induced neutrophil respiratory burst and neutrophil extracellular traps formation (NETosis). FTY720 treatment significantly attenuated renal injury and pulmonary haemorrhage in EAV. RNA sequencing analyses of renal cortex demonstrated enhanced fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signalling in FTY720-treated rats. Compared with normal controls, patients with active AAV showed decreased FAO in neutrophils. FTY720-treated differentiated HL-60 cells showed increased expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a (CPT1a) and PPARα. Blocking or knockdown of CPT1a or PPARα in isolated human neutrophils and HL-60 cells reversed the inhibitory effects of FTY720 on ANCA-induced neutrophil respiratory burst and NETosis. FTY720 attenuated renal injury in EAV through upregulating FAO via the PPARα-CPT1a pathway in neutrophils, offering potential immunometabolic targets in AAV treatment.

Clinical and humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in patients receiving immunosuppressant therapy

BackgroundDespite impaired humoral responses in patients treated with immunosuppressants (ISPs), recent studies found similar severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections compared to controls. One potential explanation is the rapid generation humoral responses upon infection, but evidence is lacking. ObjectivesTo investigate longitudinal dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire after SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron breakthrough infections in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) on ISPs and controls. MethodsAs prospective sub-study of the national Target-to-B! (T2B!) consortium, we included IMID patients on ISPs and controls who reported SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections between July 1, 2021, and April 1, 2022. To get an impression of the dynamics of the antibody repertoire, three antibody titers of wild-type RBD, wild-type S, and omicron RBD were measured at four time points after SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. ResultsWe included 302 IMID patients on ISPs and 178 controls. Antibody titers increased up to 28 days after breakthrough infections in both groups. However, in IMID patients on anti-CD20 therapy and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators, antibody titers were considerably lower compared to controls. In the anti-TNF group, we observed slightly lower antibody titers in the early stages and a faster decline of antibodies after infection compared to controls. Breakthrough infections were mostly mild and hospitalization was required in less than 1% of the cases. ConclusionsMost ISPs do not influence the dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire and exhibit a rapid recall response with cross-reactive antibody clones towards new viral variants. However, in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy or S1P modulators, the dynamics were greatly impaired, and to a lesser extent in those anti-TNF. Nevertheless, only a few severe breakthrough cases were reported.

Long-term Efficacy of the Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator Ozanimod by Age Category in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Final Results from Two Phase 3 Trials and an Open-label Extension Trial (P2-6.007)

Long-term Efficacy of the Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator Ozanimod by Age Category in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Final Results from Two Phase 3 Trials and an Open-label Extension Trial (P2-6.007)

Peripheral oedema as an adverse effect of treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with siponimod: A case series

Siponimod is a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P) modulator used to treat secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We report 3 SPMS patients treated with siponimod who developed new or worsening peripheral oedema soon after commencing treatment. In one case, peripheral oedema resulted in immobility. Siponimod-related peripheral oedema deserves wider recognition due to the potential for morbidity and over-investigation. Clinicians should assess for pre-existing oedema and coexisting conditions that may predispose to developing peripheral oedema prior to commencing siponimod.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis treatment: A practical review.

Four sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (fingolimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, and siponimod) are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. This review summarizes efficacy and safety data on these S1P receptor modulators, with an emphasis on similarities and differences. Efficacy data from the pivotal clinical trials are generally similar for the four agents. However, because no head-to-head clinical studies were conducted, direct efficacy comparisons cannot be made. Based on the adverse event profile of S1P receptor modulators, continued and regular monitoring of patients during treatment will be instructive. Notably, the authors recommend paying attention to the cardiac monitoring guidelines for these drugs, and when indicated screening for macular edema and cutaneous malignancies before starting treatment. To obtain the best outcome, clinicians should choose the drug based on disease type, history, and concomitant medications for each patient. Real-world data should help to determine whether there are meaningful differences in efficacy or side effects between these agents.