Speech Intelligibility Rating Scores Research Articles

Cochlear reimplantation outcomes over 20 years: Expertise in reimplantation surgery and auditory-speech rehabilitation

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to present an institution's experience with cochlear reimplantation (CRI), to assess surgical challenges and post-operative outcomes and to increase the success rate of CRI. Study designRetrospective single-institution study. SettingTertiary medical center. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated data from 76 reimplantation cases treated in a tertiary center between 2001 and 2022. Clinical features including etiology of hearing loss, type of failure, surgical issues, and auditory speech performance were analyzed. Categorical Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores were used to evaluate pre- and post-CRI outcomes. ResultsThe CRI population comprises of 7 patients from our institute,69 referred patients from other centers. Device failure was the most common reason (68/76, 89.5 %) for CRI; in addition, there were 7 medical failures and 1 had both soft device failure. Medical failures included flap rupture and device extrusion, magnet migration, auditory neuropathy, leukoencephalopathy, foreign-body residue and meningitis. In 21/76 patients, the electrode technology was upgraded. The mean time to failure was 0.58–13 years, with a mean of 4.97 years. The mean (± SD) CAP and SIR scores before and after CRI were 5.2 ± 1.2 versus 5.5 ± 1.1 and 3.4 ± 1.1 versus 3.5 ± 1.1, respectively. Performance was poor in six patients with severe cochlear malformation, auditory nerve dysplasia, leukoencephalopathy, and epilepsy. ConclusionCRI surgery is a challenging but relatively safe procedure, and most reimplanted patients experience favorable postoperative outcomes. Medical complications and intracochlear damage are the main causes of poor postoperative results. Therefore, adequate preoperative preparation and atraumatic CRI should be carried out for optimal results.

Cochlear implantation outcomes in children with multiple disabilities: a topic that’s worth revisiting

ObjectivesTo determine the benefits of cochlear implantation in hearing loss children with multiple disabilities (MD) in terms of auditory outcomes, speech performance, and their quality of life. MethodsThis was a cross sectional study from January 2019 to December 2020 in which thirty-one children with hearing loss and multiple disabilities were evaluated. Their improvement in auditory and speech performances were assessed using Categories of Auditory Performance version II (CAP-II) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales. The assessment was done at 6-month intervals, with the baseline evaluation done at least six months after activation of the implant. Parents were asked to fill the Parents Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) diary and Perceived Benefit Questionnaire (PBQ) to evaluate the child’s quality of life. ResultsAll 31 children have Global Developmental Delay (GDD), with 11 having an additional disability. Both mean CAP-II and SIR scores showed significant improvement with increased hearing age (p < 0.05) after 6-month intervals. In addition, 20 out of 31 children (64.5%) have achieved verbal communication after implantation. The mean PEACH score in quiet was significantly better than in noise (p = 0.007) and improved with the increased of hearing age. The majority of parents (96%‒100%) perceived a cochlear implant as beneficial to their child in terms of auditory response, awareness, interaction, communication, and speech development. ConclusionsCochlear implantation had shown benefits in children with multiple disabilities. Outcome measures should not only focus on auditory and speech performances but the improvement in quality of life. Hence, individualized each case with realistic expectation from families must be emphasized in this group of children. Level of evidenceLevel 3.

A Long-Term Follow-Up Study on the Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility of Mandarin-Speaking Prelingually Deaf Children With Isolated Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome After Cochlear Implantation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the auditory performance and speech perception of 104 children with isolated large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) and 523 children with no inner ear malformation (IEM) for 5 years after cochlear implantation, in order to explore whether isolated LVAS can affect the long-term hearing and speech rehabilitation of deaf children after cochlear implantation. A cohort study was established consisting of 627 children who underwent cochlear implantation at Beijing Tongren Hospital from 1999 to 2016. The children were examined at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after cochlear implantation to assess their auditory performance and speech perception using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) questionnaires. The CAP scores of the isolated LVAS group increased significantly during the baseline to the 24th month, after which they gradually rose until reaching the plateau during the 24th to the 60th month. The CAP scores of the non-IEM group increased significantly during the baseline to the 36th month and then increased steadily. The SIR scores went up significantly during the baseline to the 48th month, and increased in a gradual manner in other stages of isolated LVAS evaluation. In comparison, The SIR scores of non-IEM group grew remarkably from the baseline to the 60th month. There were no significant differences in the CAP or SIR scores between isolated LVAS and non-IEM groups in each stage of evaluation, with the only exception being the CAP score at baseline month after cochlear implantation. The CAP and SIR questionnaires are helpful tools for quantifying the early hearing and speech skills of younger prelingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. This long-term follow-up study shows that the speech and hearing development of children in isolated LVAS and non-IEM groups follow similar patterns, and isolated LVAS does not affect the long-term rehabilitation of deaf children after cochlear implantation.

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy.

Cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) are variable, which hampers patients' decisions on CI. This study aims to assess the outcomes of CI in individuals diagnosed with AN and to examine the various factors that may influence the effectiveness of this intervention. A total of 75 patients diagnosed with AN were included in the study. The hearing threshold, the score of categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), and speech audiometry were tested. Genetic testing was conducted by medical exome sequencing in 46 patients. After CI, the average aided hearing threshold for patients with prelingual and post-lingual onset was 38.25 ± 6.63 dB and 32.58 ± 9.26 dB, respectively; CAP score improved to 5.52 ± 1.64 (p < 0.001) and 6.00 ± 0.96 (p < 0.001), respectively; SIR score increased to 3.57 ± 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 4.15 ± 0.95 (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum speech recognition ranged from 58 to 93% for prelingual onset patients and 43 to 98% for those with post-lingual onset. Speech outcomes of CI in cases with cochlear nerve (CN) deficiency were significantly poorer (p = 0.008). Molecular etiologies, including TWIST1, ACTG1, m.A7445G, and a copy-number variant (CNV) carrying ACTB, were related to AN here. CI is a viable therapy option for patients with AN; CN deficiency might impact outcomes of CI.

Developmental Auditory and Speech-Language Performance in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation Recipients with Stable White Matter Lesions.

To analyze the association between stable asymptomatic white matter lesions (WMLs) and the cochlear implantation (CI) effect in congenitally deaf children, 43 CI children with stable asymptomatic WMLs determined via preoperative assessments and 86 peers with normal white matter were included. Outcome measurements included closed-set Mandarin Chinese (tone, disyllable, and sentence) recognition tests; categories of auditory performance (CAPs); and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scales at 1, 12, and 24 months post-CI. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to analyze the association between WML and outcomes. In the WML group (control group), median CAP and SIR scores were 5 (5) and 4 (4) with mean rates of tone, disyllable, and sentence recognition of 84.8% (89.0%), 87.9% (89.7%), and 85.8% (88.0%) at 24 months post-CI, respectively. Auditory and speech performance improved significantly with implant use. Compared to their peers in the control group, for the participants with stable asymptomatic WMLs, auditory and speech abilities were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Stable asymptomatic WMLs might not be associated with poor auditory and speech intelligibility post-CI, which indicates that it is feasible to use comprehensive assessments to screen suitable candidates with WMLs who are likely to present with a good prognosis.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Meningitis: A Multicenter Study on Auditory Performance and Speech Production Outcomes.

This study aims to evaluate speech production outcomes and auditory performance in children with post-meningitis deafness who were treated with cochlear implants. Additionally, the study assesses the impact of electrode insertion depth on surgical outcomes.". We conducted a study on 66 pediatric patients with bilateral postmeningitis hearing loss who were being prepared for cochlear implantation at four tertiary referral academic institutions. The speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and categories of auditory performance (CAP) were evaluated after the first and second years following implantation. The patients were divided into two groups based on electrode insertion depth: one group had full electrode insertion (more than two-thirds), while the other had partial electrode insertion (less than two-thirds). We compared the SIR and CAP scores between the two groups to assess the impact of electrode insertion depth on outcomes. Before implantation, the median CAP score was one, but it improved significantly to six within two years after the procedure (P-value < 0.001). Similarly, the median SIR score before implantation was one, but it improved significantly to three within two years after surgery (P-value < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the partial and full electrode insertion groups in terms of CAP and SIR scores during the follow-up evaluations conducted after the first and second years. The study found that cochlear implantation significantly improved speech production skills and auditory performance in children with postmeningitis deafness. Importantly, the amount of electrode insertion at the time of implantation did not have a significant impact on the outcomes.

Hearing and speech outcomes in children with cochlear nerve hypoplasia who underwent cochlear implantation

Background: Data on hearing and speech outcomes following cochlear implantation in prelingual sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) children with cochlear nerve hypoplasia, especially in Indonesia, is still limited. Purpose: To evaluate the hearing and speech function of prelingual SNHL children who had undergone cochlear implantation. Method: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 28 children who had undergone cochlear implantation procedures at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, for more than 12 months. The hearing and speech function of the subjects were assessed using the modified Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP-II) and the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores. Result: Children with cochlear nerve hypoplasia showed an increase in CAP-II and SIR scores after using cochlear implants for more than 12 months (versus pre-surgery, high CAP score [≥5]: 89.3% [25/28 children] vs 3.6% [1/28 children] and high SIR score [≥3]: 82.1% [23/28 children] vs 7.1% [2/28 children]; both p&lt;0.001). Post-operative CAP-II and post-operative SIR scores were highly positively correlated (r=0.705, p&lt;0.001). Type of cochlear nerve hypoplasia (unilateral vs bilateral) were not significantly associated with post-operative CAP-II and SIR scores (p=0.382 and p=0.459, respectively). Conclusion: Prelingual SNHL children with cochlear nerve hypoplasia may still get the benefit from cochlear implantation, as shown by a remarkable improvement in hearing and speech function as assessed with the CAP-II and SIR scores.&#x0D; Keywords: auditory perception, cochlear implants, cochlear nerve hypoplasia, prelingual sensorineural hearing loss, speech intelligibility

Evaluation of auditory brainstem implant (ABI) users' auditory behavior in everyday life.

This study aims to evaluate the everyday listening status of pediatric ABI users using the Turkish ABEL questionnaire. The study included 33 parents of children with auditory brainstem implant, and 28 parents of children with cochlear implant were included as a control group. All implant users were between the ages of 4-14. Parents answered the ABEL questionnaire to assess their child's auditory behavior in their daily living environment. In addition, Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales were used to evaluate speech perception and production. Auditory-aural, auditory awareness and ABEL total score of ABI users were statistically significantly lower than the CI group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the Conversational/Social skills subgroups. It was found that as the duration of ABI use increased, auditory-verbal, social skills and total scores increased significantly. In addition, correlations were obtained between ABEL total and subscale scores and CAP and SIR scores. Parents believe that their children adapt nicely to ABI and are aware of environmental sounds. This study reveals the auditory, aural, and social skills of children using ABI through the regards of their parents. This study showed that the ABEL questionnaire, which was used in previous studies to express parental views of children with hearing aids and cochlear implants, can also be used for parents of children using ABI.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Pediatrics with Inner Ear Malformations in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahvaz.

Cochlear implantation (CI) has been successful in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) over the last few years. This study assessed the auditory and speech performance results of pediatrics with inner ear malformations (IEMs) following cochlear implantation at the Ahvaz cochlear implantation center and compared the outcomes of various malformations. All pediatrics with IEMs undergoing CI were included in the study. This retrospective study was performed on pediatrics with congenital IEMs who underwent cochlear implantation in Ahvaz cochlear implantation center between 2014 and 2019. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores are two of the most frequently administered tests. The CAP with ranging from 0 (displays no awareness of environmental sounds) to 7 (can use the telephone with a familiar talker), was used to measure the speech perception performance of the implanted children. Furthermore, SIR consists of five performance categories ranging from "prerecognizable words in spoken language" to "connected speech is intelligible to all listeners". Finally, the study included 22 patients. The evaluation of the CT-Scan revealed three types of inner ear malformation: Incomplete Partition (IP)-I in 2 (9.1%), IP-II in 12 (54.5%), and common cavity in 8 (36.4%) individuals. The results were shown that the median CAP score preoperative was 0.5 (interquartile range (IQR): 0-2) and postoperative was 3.5 (IQR: 3-7). There were statistically significant differences in CAP scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.036). The results were shown that the median SIR score preoperative was 1 (IQR: 1-5) and postoperative was 2 (IQR: 1-5). There were statistically significant differences in SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.001). Following a thorough preoperative screening, patients with specific IEMs can be candidates for CI and not a contraindication. There were statistically significant differences in CAP and SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative in the common cavity and IP-II groups.

Long-Term Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Cochlear Nerve Aplasia.

In this study, we aimed to (1) review the long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve aplasia and (2) compare the development of their auditory and speech abilities to children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. This is a retrospective case-control study. Patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant (CI) surgery in a tertiary referral center from September 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed. The study group included 55 children with cochlear nerve aplasia diagnosed using preoperative images. The control group included 35 children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. The control group did not differ from the study group in terms of age at implantation, pre-implantation auditory and speech abilities, or the electrode array type. Cochlear implantation outcomes were assessed using a test battery, including the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) score, the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) score, behavioral audiometry, and closed- or open-set speech recognition tests. The development of auditory and speech abilities was compared between the two groups using Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models. The mean duration of CI usage was 4.5 years (SD = 1.5, range = 2.0 to 9.5) in the study group. The CAP scores, SIR scores, and aided hearing thresholds improved significantly post-implantation in the study group, but were significantly poorer than those in the control group. Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models showed that the development of CAP and SIR scores was significantly slower in the study group than in the control group. Overall, 27 (49%) children with cochlear nerve aplasia had some degree of open-set speech perception skills, but the monosyllabic and bisyllabic word recognition rates were significantly lower than those in the control group. For children with cochlear nerve aplasia, auditory perception and speech intelligibility continued to improve in the long-term follow-up, but this progress was significantly slower than in children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. Most children with cochlear nerve aplasia could obtain the ability of common phrase perception and understanding simple spoken language with consistent CI usage and auditory rehabilitation.

Brain MRI findings of prelingually deaf children and cochlear implant outcome: Preliminary results.

To estimate the incidence of brain abnormalities in a cohort of prelingually deaf children and whether these abnormalities can impact the hearing outcomes of patients eligible for cochlear implantation (CI). We performed a retrospective review of consecutive medical charts of prelingually deaf children under 12 years of age who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during their preoperative workup for CI surgery. We used the category of auditory performance (CAP) test and the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test to assess the hearing and speech performance of the children, respectively. The MRIs of 285 patients, 174 boys and 111 girls with a mean age of 36.4 (±16) months, were evaluated for this study. We identified 31 patients with abnormal findings (10.88%): (17/31) (54.8%) had MRI brain abnormalities, (9/31) (29%) had inner ear anomalies, and (5/31) (16.1%) had both inner ear and brain abnormalities. The most frequent inner ear anomaly was an enlarged vestibular aqueduct, while white matter lesions were the most common brain abnormality. The CAP and SIR mean score of patients with inner ear anomalies was slightly, but not significantly, higher than those of patients with brain abnormalities. CAP and SIR scores were not significantly different in children with brain abnormalities than inner ear anomalies. These patients can still benefit from CI to improve their overall hearing and speech performance.

The Outcome of Cochlear Implantations in Deaf-Blind Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.

This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in deaf-blind patients compared with deaf-only patients. Retrospective cohort study. Multiple cochlear implant centers. The current study was conducted on 17 prelingual deaf-blind children and 12 postlingual deaf-blind adults who underwent CI surgery. As a control group, 17 prelingual deaf children and 12 postlingual deaf adults were selected. Cochlear implantation. Auditory and linguistic performances in children were assessed using the categories of auditory performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales, respectively. The word recognition score (WRS) was also used to measure speech perception ability in adults. The mean CAP, SIR, and WRS cores were compared between the deaf-only and deaf-blind groups before CI surgery and at "12 months" and "24 months" after device activation. Cohen's d was used for effect size estimation. We found no significant differences in the mean CAP and SIR scores between the deaf-blind and deaf-only children before the CI surgery. For both groups, SIR and CAP scores improved with increasing time after the device activation. The mean CAP scores in the deaf-only children were either equivalent or slightly higher than those of the deaf-blind children at "12 months post-CI" (3.94 ± 0.74 vs 3.24 ± 1.25; mean difference score, 0.706) and "24 months post-CI" (6.01 ± 0.79 vs 5.47 ± 1.06; mean difference score, 0.529) time intervals, but these differences were not statistically significant. The SIR scores in deaf-only implanted children were, on average, 0.870 scores greater than the deaf-blind children at "12 months post-CI" (2.94 ± 0.55 vs 2.07 ± 1.4; p = 0.01, d = 0.97) and, on average, 1.067 scores greater than deaf-blind children at "24 months post-CI" (4.35 ± 0.49 vs 3.29 ± 1.20; p = 0.002; d = 1.15) time intervals. We also found an improvement in WRS scores from the "preimplantation" to the "12-month post-CI" and "24-month post-CI" time intervals in both groups. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the mean WRS in the deaf-only adults was, on average, 10.61% better than deaf-blind implanted adults at "12 months post-CI" (62.33 ± 9.09% vs 51.71 ± 10.73%, p = 0.034, d = 1.06) and, on average, 15.81% better than deaf-blind adults at "24-months post-CI" (72.67 ± 8.66% vs 56.8 ± 9.78%, p = 0.002, d = 1.61) follow-ups. Cochlear implantation is a beneficial method for the rehabilitation of deaf-blind patients. Both deaf-blind and deaf-only implanted children revealed similar auditory performances. However, speech perception ability in deaf-blind patients was slightly lower than the deaf-only patients in both children and adults.

Auditory perception in pediatric cochlear implant users with cochlear nerve hypoplasia

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to assess auditory perception and speech intelligibility outcomes in children with cochlear nerve (CN) hypoplasia who received cochlear implants (CIs) using Categories of Auditory Performance II (CAP II) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales. MethodsIn total, 40 children who received CI and who were aged between 3 and 18 years were included in this study. The study group included 20 children with CN hypoplasia at least one ear, while the control group included 20 children with normal cochleas and cochlear nerve structures. All children in the study and control groups who participated were evaluated using the CAP II and the SIR scale. Demographic data were collected. ResultsSignificant differences were found between the study and control groups’ CAP II and SIR scores (p < 0.001). It was found that CAP II scores were positively correlated with SIR scores in the study (r = 0.743, p < 0.001) and control (r = 0.601, p < 0.001) groups. In the study group, significant negative correlations were found between SIR scores and age at implantation (r = −0.674, p = 0.004) and between CAP II scores and age at implantation (r = 0.751, p = 0.003). In the control group, a significant negative correlation was found between age at implantation and CAP II scores (r = −0.805, p = 0.001). Similarly, a significant negative correlation was found between age at implantation and SIR scores (r = −0.702, p = 0.007). ConclusionEven for children with severe inner ear malformation and CN hypoplasia, CI is an effective treatment modality for auditory perception and speech production. However, it should be noted that CN hypoplasia affects auditory performance negatively in children with CI.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder of Genetic and Non-Genetic Etiologies: A Multicenter Study.

With diverse etiologies and clinical features, the management of pediatric auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is often challenging, and the outcomes of cochlear implants (CIs) are variable. This study aimed to investigate CI outcomes in pediatric patients with ANSD of different etiologies. Thirty-six children with ANSD who underwent cochlear implantation between 2001 and 2021 were included. Comprehensive etiological analyses were conducted, including a history review, next-generation sequencing-based genetic examinations, and imaging studies using high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Serial behavioral and speech audiometry were performed before and after surgery, and the outcomes with CI were evaluated using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores. By etiology, 18, 1, 1, and 10 patients had OTOF-related, WFS1-related, OPA1-related, and cochlear nerve deficiency (CND)-related ANSD, respectively. Six patients had no definite etiology. The average CI-aided behavioral threshold was 28.3 ± 7.8 dBHL, and those with CND-related ANSD were significantly worse than OTOF-related ANSD. The patients’ median CAP and SIR scores were 6 and 4, respectively. Favorable CI outcomes were observed in patients with certain etiologies of ANSD, particularly those with OTOF (CAP/SIR scores 5–7/2–5), WFS1 (CAP/SIR score 6/5), and OPA1 variants (CAP/SIR score 7/5). Patients with CND had suboptimal CI outcomes (CAP/SIR scores 2–6/1–3). Identifying the etiologies in ANSD patients is crucial before surgery and can aid in predicting prognoses.

Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to critically assess the effect of cochlear implantation on auditory and speech performance outcomes of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMbase, and Web of Science. The outcomes included speech recognition score, Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) score, and open-set speech perception. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of 15 studies was included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data showed that, there were no significant differences between ANSD and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) groups in terms of speech recognition score (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.45, 0.47; P = .959),CAP (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: -0.13, 1.54; P = .098), SIR score (SMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.49, 0.32; P = .667), and open-set speech perception (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.05; P = .142). Sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies one at a time showed that the overall estimate and level of heterogeneity did not change substantially. The current evidence suggested that children with ANSD who underwent cochlear implants achieved comparable effects in auditory and speech performance as children with non-ANSD SNHL.

Different modes of cochlear implantation in children: a comparative study on hearing and speech rehabilitation effects.

To study the effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implantation, binaural-bimodal hearing devices, and bilateral cochlear implantation in children with inner-ear malformation. This study comprised 261 patients who were allocated to inner-ear malformation or control groups. Twenty-four months after surgery, aided sound-field thresholds were tested, and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Meaningful Use of Speech Scale, Categories of Auditory Performance scale and Speech Intelligibility Rating test were completed. Aided sound-field thresholds were significantly better for bilateral cochlear implantation patients than for unilateral cochlear implantation or binaural-bimodal hearing device patients. There was no significant difference in Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, or Categories of Auditory Performance scores among the three groups. The binaural-bimodal hearing device patients outperformed unilateral cochlear implantation patients on both Meaningful Use of Speech Scale and Speech Intelligibility Rating scores. No statistical difference was observed between the two subgroups. Children who received bilateral cochlear implants have the best auditory awareness in a quiet environment. Children with binaural-bimodal hearing devices have better voice control and verbal skills than unilateral cochlear implantation patients, and people are more likely to understand them. Children with inner-ear malformations benefit from cochlear implantation.

Auditory performance and speech intelligibility among children with cochlear implant under a state-sponsored insurance scheme: a cross-sectional study

Background: Cochlear implant is the intervention for improving the auditory performance and speech ability for children between 6-12 years with congenital deafness under the Chief Minister’s Comprehensive Health Insurance Scheme, a state-sponsored insurance scheme in Tamil Nadu. Until 2020, 4107 children had been provided with a cochlear implant under the scheme. However, the outcome of this intervention was not studied so far. Hence, as a program evaluation auditory performance and speech intelligibility among patients who received cochlear implant under the scheme is studied.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 203 patients who had received a cochlear implant at least 1 year ago. Children were evaluated for auditory performance and speech intelligibility using revised Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores by trained speech therapists in Government Medical College hospitals. The proportion of good scorers in CAP (level ≥7) and SIR (category ≥ 3) was computed. The difference in proportion between different demographics was tested using the Chi-square test and Fischer exact test.Results: The median CAP and SIR scores of the children were 8 (Interquartile Range – 4) and 3 (IQR – 2) respectively. Almost 2/3rd of the children had good auditory performance and speech intelligibility. Factors that were associated with good auditory performance and speech intelligibility were being a girl child, getting the implant before 3 years of age, and getting it in a private institution.Conclusions: Gender and age at implant influences auditory performance and speech intelligibility after cochlear implant. Hence, early screening for deafness should be made a routine to enable early detection and management, thereby preventing permanent disability.

Evaluation of the language development of children with cochlear implant users living in a multilingual environment

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of second language exposure on Turkish speaking skills in cochlear implant (CI) users. MethodsChildren living in mono and bilingual families, who underwent unilateral cochlear implant due to congenital severe to profound, or profound hearing loss, were examined. The fifty six children with a chronological age younger than 8 and a language age of 2–6 years were included the study. The Denver II Developmental Screening Test was used for identifying of pre-implant speech and development. The duration of implant use was also documented. Languages spoken at the patients' homes were divided into 4 categories: T/K: Predominantly Turkish/Kurdish, K/T: Predominantly Kurdish/Turkish, T/T: Just Turkish, A/T: Predominantly Arabic/Turkish. The CAP (Categories of Auditory Performance), SIR (Speech Intelligibility Rating), The Turkish Version Test of The Early Language Development (TELD-3:T),. The IT-MAIS (Infant Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale), MUSS (Meaningful Use of Speech Scale) were used to evaluate the language development of the patients. Changes in IT-MAIS and MUSS scores in the last two years were also evaluated. ResultsThe all children received their implants before age of 6 years. The average duration of cochlear implant use of children was 38,43 ± 11,64 months. The mean pre-implant speech age was 6,8 ± 2,13 months. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the CAP and SIR scores. In TELD-3:T scores, there was no significant difference between the groups except for the receptive raw scores. The Arabic/Turkish group had significantly lower receptive raw scores. This group also had significantly lower mother educational level.In IT-MAIS and MUSS scores, no significant difference was found between the groups. ConclusionsOur study supports the opinion that exposure to a second language at home does not affect the acquisition of the language of education in children using CI.

The imaging characteristics and prognosis of patients with cochlear implants whose cochlear nerves are not shown on MRI

Objective: To analyze the temporal bone CT and inner ear magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of cochlear implant patients with no cochlear nerve display in the inner auditory canal under MRI. To retrospectively analyze the long-term hearing and speech rehabilitation effects of such patients after cochlear implant. And to analyze the correlation between the results of imaging examinations and the postoperative effects of cochlear implant patients with this type of cochlear nerve deficiency. Methods: A total of 88 children with cochlear nerve deficiency, who underwent cochlear implantation in Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital from May 2014 to October 2018, were enrolled. Patients with cochlear malformations were excluded,only the patients with cochlear nerve deficiency whose cochlear structure was normal and no cochlear nerve displayed in inner auditory canal under MRI were enrolled. There were 64 patients, including 4 bilaterally implanted, 68 ears in total, with an average age of (2.8±1.7) years (range 1-6 years) at the time of implantation. The implanted product was Cochlear, including 24RECA and 512 models. All patients underwent inner ear magnetic resonance imaging and temporal bone CT scan before operation. Auditory speech function assessments were performed at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after surgery, including categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and hearing aid threshold test. The imaging evaluation content included the width of the cochlear nerve canal of temporal bone CT, the width of the internal auditory canal, the width of the auditory nerve at the cerebellopontine angle of the inner ear MRI, and the ratio of the facial nerve to the width of the auditory nerve at the cerebellopontine angle. The correlations between the results of postoperative hearing aid hearing threshold, CAP, SIR and imaging results were analyzed. Results: Among the 64 cases of cochlear nerve not shown under MRI, 56 ears with CT data showed that the width of the cochlear nerve canal in temporal bone CT was (0.72±0.30) mm (mean±standard deviation, the same below), and the width of the internal auditory canal was (4.07±1.10) mm; 66 ears with MRI data showed that the diameter of the auditory nerve at the cerebellopontine angle of the inner ear MRI was (1.58±0.27) mm, the diameter of the facial nerve was (1.57±0.27) mm, and the ratio of the diameter of the facial nerve to the auditory nerve was (1.02±0.23). The average hearing thresholds at 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery were (46.8±2.5) dB HL, (40.7±0.8) dB HL, and (36.8±1.5) dB HL, respectively. The preoperative and postoperative CAP scores at 12, 24 and 36 months were (1.0±1.0), (3.8±1.4), (4.5±1.4) and (5.1±0.7) points, respectively. The preoperative and postoperative SIR scores at 12, 24, and 36 months were (1.1±0.3), (1.9±0.9), (2.5±0.9), and (2.9±0.6) points, respectively. The hearing threshold at 24 months after surgery was negatively correlated with the width of the internal auditory canal of temporal bone CT (r=-0.349, P=0.037), and the hearing threshold at 36 months after surgery was positively correlated with the ratio of the diameter of the facial nerve to the auditory nerve at the cerebellopontine angle of the inner ear MRI (r=0.740, P=0.001). Conclusions: Children with cochlear implants whose cochlear nerves are not shown on MRI can benefit from cochlear implantation, and their speech and auditory functions can improve significantly after surgery. The width of the internal auditory canal in the temporal bone CT and the ratio of the diameter of the facial nerve to the auditory nerve at the cerebellopontine angle of the inner ear MRI may be related to the long-term hearing threshold after surgery.

The Comparison of Speech Intelligibility between the Cochlear Implanted and Normal-Hearing Children.

Background: Following the development of new hearing technologies, assessment of speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired children is of great interest. The main purpose of this study was to compare speech intelligibility and auditory perception abilities in children with normal-hearing (NH) and children with hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI). Methods: This analytic cross-sectional study consisted of 60 Persian-speaking children aged 5 to 7-years. Participants were classified into 3 groups of 20 people, including NH (mean age, 71.70±5.05 months), CI (mean age, 72.60±8.20 months), and HA (mean age, 71.45±10.56 months) children. The speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and categories of auditory performance (CAP) tests were conducted for all children to measure their speech intelligibility and auditory perception, respectively. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare CAP and SIR scores among the 3 groups. Results: The mean SIR score in the NH children was significantly higher than the HA (p=0.002) and CI (p=0.009) groups. However, these differences between the HA and CI children were not significant (p=0.885). We found a significant difference between the CAP scores in the 3 groups (p=0.038). Furthermore, the post hoc analysis results indicated that the mean CAP scores in NH children were significantly higher than the HA and CI participants. Based on the results, the speech intelligibility and auditory performance abilities in NH children were significantly greater than the hearing-impaired (CI and HA) children. However, these abilities between HA and CI users were not significantly different. Conclusion: Based on the results, the early acoustical amplification on auditory and speech functions in children with hearing loss is of paramount importance.