Fifty-one patients were treated with homografts obtained from both related and nonrelated volunteer donors in the interval from November 24, 1962, to February 10, 1964. Thirty-three of the 51 patients lived for 4 or more months postoperatively, and 30 of these are still living on June 10, 1964. The three deaths which occurred after 4 months were due to a combination of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and sepsis in one; to a cerebrovascular accident of undetermined etiology in the second; and to uncontrolled late rejection in the third, which was first diagnosed 229 days after operation, 66 days before death. The two homografts examined at autopsy after 207 and 295 days were both enlarged and showed glomerular hypertrophy, tubular atrophy, mild cellular infiltrations, marked interstitial fibrosis, and destruction of peritubular capillaries. The case that died in uncontrolled rejection also showed interstitial edema and a spectrum of vascular lesions. Late nonfatal rejection was observed in five other cases 112 to 300 days postoperatively. In all these cases, and in the unsuccessfully treated one as well, certain consistent features were present. There had always been a preceding alteration in steroid dose, prednisone having been discontinued in five of the six patients from 16 to 154 days previously. Progress of the rejection was slow, and the proper diagnosis depended most strongly upon demonstration of a gradual fall in creatinine clearance. Elevations in blood pressure, transplant wound tenderness, fluid accumulation, alopecia, polyarthritis, fever, malaise, and anorexia were all observed. Azotemia was a late finding. The diagnosis of late rejection is one of exclusion. Pyelonephritis, vascular anastomotic failure, and ureteral obstruction are first ruled out. The last possibility is a particularly important one since 4 of the 33 patients who lived for 4 months or longer have been shown to have partial ureteral obstruction which required secondary repair. In one case, there was strong evidence that the stricture resulted from healing of an earlier ureteral rejection. If diagnosed promptly, late homograft rejection can be reversed. The crucial step in the treatment of rejection is the resumption or increase of steroid dosage. In addition, local irradiation to the graft and intravenous actinomycin C are both of use as emergency therapy. The chronic administration of azathioprine has thus far appeared to be very well-tolerated by those patients who are receiving only this drug, although its ultimate toxicity will take years to determine. The superimposition of steroid therapy, in those patients whose homograft function cannot be otherwise maintained, adds a serious risk. Gastrointestinal hemorrhages, infections, aseptic bone necrosis, potentiation of hypertension, and severe obesity have all been observed. The course of five patients who received preliminary thymectomy and who survived more than 4 months is compared to that of the other recipients who did not receive this additional operation. One of the patients who had thymic excision died after 207 days of nonrenal complications. The other four had steroids discontinued in 9 months or less, and none have had any evidence of delayed rejection 14 to 18 months after operation. The 6 examples of late rejection all occurred in the other 28 long-surviving patients who did not have removal of the thymus gland. The possible role of thymectomy in influencing these late events remains to be determined. Renal function ranged from adequate to essentially normal levels in all patients who survived longer than 4 months, except the one who died of uncontrolled late rejection. In four cases, in which late renal function was tested at a time when rejection was not present, the results in paired donors and recipients were almost identical, suggesting hypertrophy in the homograft as well as in the donor’s residual kidney. These results indicate that considerably more than half the patients who are treated with renal homotransplantation can be brought into a chronic stage, even when the statistics are unfavorably altered by the use of a substantial number of nonrelated donors as was the case in the present series. The data also indicate that overoptimism must be avoided in assessing the future role of this form of therapy since it is quite evident that many adverse factors still exist in the residual group of living patients, and that life-threatening late complications are going to be common. These include toxicity from drugs, especially if indefinite steroid therapy is required; late rejection; urologic complications; and subtle subclinical progression of pathologic alterations in the homograft.
Read full abstract