Specificity Of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Research Articles

Feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Endoleaks are common complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Computed tomographic angiography (CTA)/digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is considered the gold standard for evaluating contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) accuracy in the detection and classification of endoleaks. In recent years, CEUS has been widely used in this field. This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of CEUS in the detection and classification of endoleaks after EVAR. The data of 98 patients who underwent abdominal aorta CEUS from November 2017 to September 2023 in the ultrasound (US) department of Beijing Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent EVAR of AAA before CEUS and CTA/DSA, and had complete clinical data. The CEUS and CTA/DSA results were compared to detect endoleaks and categorize the specific types of endoleaks. Among the 98 patients, 74 were male and 24 were female. The patients had an average age of 74.8±9.8 years (range, 43-90 years). Among the 98 patients, 37 (37.8%) endoleaks were detected by CEUS, of which 8 were type Ia, 2 were type Ib, 15 were type II, 7 were type III, 2 were type IV, 2 were type Ia combined with type III, and 1 was type II combined with type III. In addition, among these 98 patients, 39 (39.8%) endoleaks were detected by CTA/DSA, of which 8 were type Ia, 3 were type Ib, 18 were type II, 6 were type III, 2 were type Ia combined with type III, 1 was type II combined with type III, and 1 was type Ib combined with type II. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the detection of endoleaks were 92.3% and 98.3%, respectively. CEUS and CTA/DSA had similar diagnostic efficacy and good consistency in the detection and classification of endoleaks (Kappa value: 0.914, P<0.01). CEUS has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection and classification of endoleaks following EVAR, and its diagnostic efficacy is similar to that of CTA/DSA. In addition, US is safe, non-invasive and repeatable, and thus is worthy of extensive clinical application.

Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of breast adenosis and breast cancer.

This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to determine the total capacity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions and breast cancer. For collecting papers, four groups of keywords were searched in five databases. The required information was extracted from the selected papers. In addition to the descriptive findings, a meta-analysis was also conducted. Thirty-three of thirty-six studies (91.67%) on the differential diagnosis of various degrees and types of breast lesions showed that CEUS has proper performance. The pooled values related to the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were computed by 88.00 and 76.17.

Comparison of microvascular flow imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for blood flow analysis of cervical lymph node lesions.

To compare the diagnostic value of microvascular flow imaging (MVFI) with that of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the analysis of blood flow in benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. As a prospective study, 95 cervical enlarged lymph nodes (43 benign and 52 malignant) were observed in 95 patients using conventional ultrasonography (including gray and Color Doppler Flow Imaging), CEUS, and MVFI. Two researchers evaluated vascular parameters of MVFI (vascular distribution, internal vascular features, vascular index) and CEUS (enhancement mode, enhancement type) and compared the diagnostic effects of MVFI and CEUS.All results were compared with pathological findings. There were significant differences in the vascular distribution and internal vascular features of benign and malignant lymph nodes on MVFI (P < 0.05). The vascular distribution of benign lymph nodes was mainly of the central and avascular types, the internal blood vessels were mostly normal, the vascular distribution of malignant lymph nodes was mainly mixed, the internal vessels were mainly tortuous and displaced. The optimal cut-off value of the benign and malignant lymph node vascular index (VI) was 15.55%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the VI was 0.876. There were also significant differences in the enhancement mode and types of benign and malignant lymph nodes in CEUS (P < 0.05). The benign lymph nodes showed centrifugal perfusion, and the enhancement types were mostly type I and type II. Most malignant lymph nodes showed centripetal or mixed perfusion, and the enhancement types were usually type III and type IV. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CEUS in the diagnosis of lymph node lesions were 84.2%, 84.6% and 83.7%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.845. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MVFI in the diagnosis of lymph node lesions were 85.3%, 84.6%, and 86.0%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.886. Both CEUS and MVFI are valuable in differentiating benign and malignant lesions of lymph nodes and have a similar diagnostic performance; however, MVFI is less invasive and simpler than CEUS. Therefore it is preferred for auxiliary examination of enlarged lymph nodes that are difficult to diagnose by conventional ultrasound.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

The status of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is an important factor in determining the stage of breast cancer (BC) and the surgical procedure, and also a biomarker of the BC prognosis. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for SLN metastasis. A systematic search was conducted for relevant articles published in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, OVID databases, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2023. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR; NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS in SLN metastasis. Subgroup analysis was also performed to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. A total of 12 studies with 1525 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the diagnosis of SLN metastasis were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.92). The PLR, NLR, and DOR were 6.51 (95% CI: 4.09-10.36), 0.11 (95% CI: 0.07-0.18), and 59.43 (95% CI: 33.27-106.17), respectively, and the area under the SROC curve was determined to be 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.96), all showing excellent diagnostic value. In the subgroup analysis, percutaneous CEUS was more sensitive than intravenous CEUS in the diagnosis of SLN metastases (0.92 versus 0.82, p < 0.05). CEUS, especially percutaneous CEUS, is a reliable imaging technique for diagnosing SLN metastasis and providing important information in the stage management of breast cancer.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: a systematic review.

Intra-abdominal injury is a major cause of morbidity in children. Computed tomography (CT) is the reference standard for the evaluation of hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma. CT has an increased risk of long-term radiation induced malignancies and a possible risk associated with the use of iodinated contrast media. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) might represent an alternative to CT in stable children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Nonetheless, CEUS in pediatrics remains limited by the lack of strong evidence. The purpose of this study was to offer a systematic review on the use of CEUS in pediatric abdominal trauma. Electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases of studies investigating CEUS for abdominal trauma in children. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. This systematic review included 7 studies. CEUS was performed with different ultrasound equipment, always with a curvilinear transducer. Six out of seven studies used a second-generation contrast agent. No immediate adverse reactions were reported. The dose of contrast agent and the scanning technique varied between studies. All CEUS exams were performed by radiologists, in the radiology department or at the bedside. No standard training was reported to become competent in CEUS. The range of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 85.7 to 100% and 89 to 100%, respectively. CEUS appears to be safe and accurate to identify abdominal solid organ injuries in children with BAT. Further research is necessary to assess the feasibility of CEUS by non-radiologists, the necessary training, and the benefit-cost ratio of CEUS as a tool to potentially reduce CT scans.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting early lymph-node metastasis in oral cancer.

To explore the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting early lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative oral cancer patients. We recruited 42 patients (a total of 70 lymph nodes) with clinically node-negative oral cancer in the study. All of them received both conventional ultrasound (B-mode and power Doppler) and CEUS before operation and then they were taken for pathological examination to analyze the diagnostic accuracy. And their CEUS data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of oral cancer were 82.7 and 82.9%, respectively. The accuracy of conventional ultrasound was only 67.1% while that of CEUS was up to 82.9%. The area under the cure (AUC) of CEUS in detecting lymph node metastasis was 0.828, which was higher than the 0.614 by conventional ultrasound, with statistically significant differences observed (p < 0.05). Most of the metastatic lymph nodes were characterized by inhomogeneous enhancement and the peak intensity (PI) of the metastatic group was lower than that of the non-metastatic group (p < 0.05). Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS may have higher clinical value for predicting early lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative oral cancer patients. And quantitative parameters obtained from CEUS may provide valuable information in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis.

Возможности применения стратификационной системы O-RADS и ультразвукового исследования с контрастным усилением в дифференциальной диагностике опухолей яичников

Objective. To study the effectiveness of gray-scale ultrasound imaging (according to O-RADS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Patients and methods. A total of 100 patients with ovarian neoplasms were observed, in whom the diagnosis was confirmed by morphological examination. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 67) met the O-RADS 2-3 criteria (low risk of malignancy), and group 2 (n = 33) met the O-RADS 4-5 criteria (intermediate and high risk of malignancy). Results. The mean age of patients was 32.7 ± 6.72 years. Sensitivity (Se) of O-RADS was 84.8% (95% CI: 80-88%), specificity (Sp) of O-RADS was 88.1% (95% CI: 85-91%). Sensitivity of CEUS was 90.9% (95% CI: 85-95%), specificity of CEUS was 92.5% (95% CI: 89-97%). In ROC analysis of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS, AUC = 0.895; in analysis of sensitivity and specificity of O-RADS, AUC = 0.744 (p ≤ 0.005). Conclusion. Given its high sensitivity and specificity, the O-RADS stratification system should be used in the interpretation of ultrasound imaging of any ovarian neoplasm. The CEUS can be used as an alternative to other, significantly more expensive contrast-enhanced imaging techniques, such as CT or MRI, in the differential diagnosis of “complicated” ovarian tumors. Key words: diagnosis, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, ovarian tumor, ultrasound, O-RADS

Assessment of intrasynovial injection in horses by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using air bubbles created by agitation of solution.

Accuracy of intrasynovial injections can be challenging to assess in a clinical setting in horses. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using injectate agitated with air has been used to determine the success rates of synovial injections in human rheumatology. To assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CEUS and to describe its clinical use. Cadaveric study followed by a prospective descriptive observational study. Part 1: CEUS was performed following injection of agitated methylene-blue solution targeting 13 different anatomical synovial structures from three equine cadavers. Contrast was seen as hyperechoic dots, patches or lines on ultrasonography. CEUS was classified as positive if contrast was considered to be intrasynovial and negative if contrast was considered to be extrasynovial. A second synoviocentesis was performed to determine if the injection was intrasynovial based on the presence or absence of methylene-blue. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Part 2: CEUS was performed following injection of agitated solutions targeting synovial structures as part of routine investigation and treatment of clinical cases. Part 1: CEUS was correctly classified as positive or negative in all intrasynovial and extrasynovial injections respectively. The sensitivity estimate was 100% (CI 93%-100%) and the specificity estimates was 100% (CI 16%-100%). Part 2: The technique was used safely for 26 injections (14 horses; 19 different synovial structures) administered to localise or treat lameness. Traumatic intersynovial communications or synovial membrane defects were identified using CEUS in 3 horses. The low number of extrasynovial injections in Part 1 resulted in an imprecise specificity estimate. In horses, CEUS performed following intended intrasynovial injection can be useful for identifying unsuccessful injections.

Imaging of colorectal cancer liver metastases using contrast-enhanced US, multidetector CT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis

Imaging of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) has improved in recent years. Therefore, the role of current imaging techniques needs to be defined. To assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the detection of CRCLMs. PubMed database was searched for articles published during 2000-2019. Inclusion criteria were as follows: diagnosis/suspicion of CRCLMs; CEUS, MDCT, MRI, or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of CRCLMs; prospective study design; histopathologic examination, intraoperative findings and/or follow-up used as reference standard; and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. Twelve prospective studies were assessed, including 536 patients with CRCLMs (n = 1335). On a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity of CEUS, MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT was 86%, 84%, 89%, and 62%, respectively. MRI had the highest sensitivity on a per-lesion analysis. CEUS and MDCT had comparable sensitivities. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS, MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT was 80% and 97%, 87% and 95%, 87% and 94%, and 96% and 97%, respectively. The per-patient sensitivities for MRI and MDCT were similar. The sensitivity for MRI was higher than that for CEUS, MDCT, and FDG PET/CT for lesions <10 mm and lesions at least 10 mm in size. Hepatospecific contrast agent did not improve diagnostic performances. MRI is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating CRCLMs. Both MDCT and CEUS can be used as alternatives.

Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Splenic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Accurate diagnosis of splenic diseases is important for timely and accurate treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound (US) in detecting splenic lesions. A systematic literature search was undertaken, and 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the consolidated results of CEUS were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99), respectively (I2 = 27.4%; area under the curve [AUC] from a summary receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.97). The sensitivity and specificity of the consolidated results of conventional US were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.80) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.76-0.99; I2 = 83.4%; AUC = 0.84). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were higher than those of conventional US in diagnosing splenic lesions. Contrast-enhanced US is a promising method for accurately diagnosing splenic lesions.

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities in differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of radiological imaging in differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) from gallbladder cancer (GBC). A retrospective analysis of the radiological imaging performed in patients who had pathologically confirmed XGC or GBC between December 2004 to April 2016 was performed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each imaging modality, and combined imaging modalities were calculated. A total of 218 patients (XGC =109, GBC =109) were identified; 19 patients received all of abdominal ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT); 21 received four of these imaging examination types; 45 received three examinations; 58 received two examinations; and 75 received only one examination. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS was 90% and 93%, respectively, higher than abdominal US (80%, 86%), CT (71%, 92%), MRI (75%, 90%), and PET/CT (55%, 90%) (all values respective). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of the US combined with CEUS were 91%, 90%, 94%, and 85%, respectively. Although the specificity of CEUS + CT and CEUS + MRI were 100% and 92%, respectively, the sensitivity of CEUS + CT and CEUS + MRI were both only 67%. The Abdominal US is not sufficiently accurate to confidently guide clinical practice, and CEUS showed better diagnostic performance than the other imaging modalities in differentiating XGC from GBC. The combination of abdominal CEUS and CT is helpful for differential diagnosis, as it indicates GBC with better specificity and PPV.

Evaluation of carotid plaque vulnerability by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging

Objective To observe the plaque surface morphology and neo-vascularization within the plaque using superb microvascular imaging(SMI)and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS), and to compare the correlation and consistency of the two technologies based on making clinical diagnosis of symptomatic carotid artery plaque as the standard. Methods A total of 92 patients undergoing carotid ultrasonography in Beijing Tiantan Hospital from August 2016 to October 2017 were recruited, including 61 males and 31 females, aged(63.5 ± 7.7)years(range, 42-80 years.A total of 105 plaques were found.According to whether or not to have plaque-induced ipsilateral ischemic symptoms, patients were divided double-blindly into the symptom group and the non-symptom group.The features of plaque(including surface morphology and neo-vascularization)were recorded.The ultrasonographic findings were chi-squarely tested. Results There were statistically significant differences in the surface morphology and enhancement degree of CEUS between carotid artery plaque-induced ischemic symptom group and the non-symptom group(χ2=6.865, P=0.032; χ2=22.494, P<0.001). The SMI-detected surface morphology and neo-vascularization had statistically significant differences between the two groups(χ2=10.367, P=0.006; χ2=8.186, P=0.041). The correlations of plaque surface morphology(r=0.856, P<0.001)and diagnostic consistency(r=0.802, P<0.001)between SMI and CEUS were higher.In the symptom group, SMI-showed plaque fissures and small surface pitting were in 33.9%(20/59)of patients, and CEUS-showed plaque fissures and small surface pitting were in 25.4%(15/59)of patients.And SMI had a better detection rate of slight and irregular appearances on plaque surface.Taking the first grade of the plaque surface as the standard, CEUS showed a sensitivity of 42.4% and specificity of 80.4% for detecting symptomatic plaques, and SMI showed a sensitivity of 54.2% and specificity of 76.1%.The two methods had similar specificity, and SMI had a slightly higher sensitivity than did CEUS.CEUS and SMI had a good correlation of plaque neo-vascularization(r=0.802, P<0.001)and a moderate diagnostic consistency(r=0.539, P<0.001). Taking the enhancement level of 2 as the standard, CEUS showed a sensitivity of 75.8% and specificity of 67.4% for detecting the symptomatic plaque, and SMI showed a sensitivity of 58.6% and specificity of 69.5%.The two methods had similar specificity, and CEUS had a higher sensitivity than did SMI. Conclusions SMI and CEUS have a good consistency for detecting plaque surface morphology.SMI and CEUS are more correlated with plaque-induced symptoms than is two-dimensional ultrasound.The SMI has a higher display rate and repeatability than does CEUS for detecting the small fissures and the surface features of plaques.Compared with SMI-detected neo-vascularization, the degree of CEUS enhancement is more correlated with the symptoms.The specificity of CEUS and SMI is similar, and the sensitivity of CEUS is higher than that of SMI. Key words: Carotid artery thrombosis; Ultrasonography

Impact of thyroid nodule sizes on the diagnostic performance of Korean thyroid imaging reporting and data system and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of thyroid nodule sizes on the diagnostic performance of Korean thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In total, 308 consecutive patients with 382 thyroid nodules underwent US-guided FNA or surgery were included in this retrospective study. The nodule size was classified into 3 categories: ≤10 mm (group A), 10-20 mm (group B), and ≥20 mm (group C). We compared the risk of malignancy in each subgroup, categorized according to the TIRADS and CEUS patterns. In group A, the differences in diagnostic value between TIRADS and CEUS were significant (AUC: 0.804 vs 0.733, P = 0.028, sensitivity: 81.8% vs 72.7%, P = 0.013, specificity: 88.9% vs 79.4%, P = 0.011). In group B, the AUC (0.897), sensitivity (88.1%) and specificity (91.9%) of CEUS were highest. In group C, the specificity of CEUS was significantly higher compared with TIRADS classification (90.8% vs 82.9%, P = 0.023), while the sensitivity and AUC showed no significant difference between the two models (84.2% vs 81.5%, P > 0.406, 0.848 vs 0.820, P = 0.545). Nodule size influences the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods. TIRADS have best value in nodules ≤10 mm, while CEUS perform best for differentiating lesions >10 mm, especially in lesions ≥20 mm.

Diagnostic Utility of Third-Look, Contrast-Enhanced Sonography Followed by Needle Biopsy for MRI, But Not Second-look Ultrasonography-detected Breast Lesions.

To clarify the diagnostic utility of third-look, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for MRI-detected breast lesions undetectable by unenhanced, second-look ultrasonography (MRI+/US- lesions). Clinical stage 0-IIA breast cancer patients who underwent CEUS for incidental MRI+/US- lesions (n=27; cohort 1) and patients with breast lesions detected only by MRI, to be examined by CEUS (n=15; cohort 2), were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 42 MRI+/US- lesions, 23 (55%) were detected by CEUS and then examined by needle biopsy. Pathological examination showed that 10 of these 23 lesions were malignant. None of the 19 lesions undetected by CEUS were found to be histologically malignant or developed malignancy with a median follow-up of 18.5 months. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CEUS plus needle biopsy were 98%, 91%, and 100%, respectively. Third-look CEUS followed by needle biopsy is useful in the initial diagnosis of MRI+/US- lesions.

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Competent and Incompetent Lower-Extremity Perforating Veins

The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the identification of competent and incompetent lower-extremity perforating veins. Patients with chronic venous insufficiency who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. All patients underwent pre-operative CEUS and color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and accepted subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery. We compared the numbers of perforator veins identified by CEUS and CDU with the endoscopy result, which was considered the gold standard. Fifty cases (56 lower extremities) were enrolled. CEUS detected 132 perforating veins, and CDU detected 104 perforating veins. Endoscopy detected 148 perforating veins. The sensitivity and specificity of CDU in predicting the site of perforating veins in our study were 70.2% and 100%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 89.2% and 100%, respectively (p < 0.05). CEUS could be used to detect perforating veins, including incompetent and competent veins of the lower extremity, because it was more sensitive than CDU, with intra-operative endoscopy as the control standard.

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for liver tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

To review the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) used to detect residual or recurrent liver tumors after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This technique uses contrast-enhanced computer tomography or/and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard of investigation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE were systematically searched for all potentially eligible studies comparing CEUS with the reference standard that follows RFA. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were addressed by adopting the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Pooled point estimates for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% CI were computed before plotting the sROC (summary receiver operating characteristic) curve. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to identify the source of the heterogeneity that was detected. Publication bias was evaluated using Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test. Ten eligible studies on 1162 lesions that occurred between 2001 and 2016 were included in the final analysis. The quality of the included studies assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool was considered reasonable. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in detecting residual or recurrent liver tumors had the following values: 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.00), respectively. Overall DOR was 420.10 (95% CI 142.30-1240.20). The sources of heterogeneity could not be precisely identified by meta-regression or subgroup analysis. No evidence of publication bias was found. This study confirmed that CEUS exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in assessing therapeutic responses to RFA for liver tumors.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the evaluation of incidental focal liver lesions: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

AIMTo determine whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) as the first-line method is more cost-effective in evaluating incidentally discovered focal liver lesions (FLLs) than is computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).METHODSBetween 2010 and 2015, our prospective study enrolled 459 patients with incidentally found FLLs. The biological nature of FLLs was assessed by CEUS in all patients. CT or MRI examinations were added in unclear cases. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were calculated. The total costs of CEUS examinations and of the added examinations performed in inconclusive cases were calculated. Afterwards, the theoretical expenses for evaluating incidentally discovered FLLs using CT or MRI as the first-line method were calculated. The results were compared.RESULTSThe total cost of the diagnostic process using CEUS for all enrolled patients with FLLs was 75884 USD. When the expenses for additional CT and MRI examinations performed in inconclusive cases were added, the total cost was 90540 US dollar (USD). If all patients had been examined by CT or MR as the first-line method, the costs would have been 78897 USD or 384235 USD, respectively. The difference between the cost of CT and CEUS was 3013 USD (4%) and that between MRI and CEUS was 308352 USD (406.3%). We correctly described 97.06% of benign or malignant lesions, with 96.99% sensitivity and 97.09% specificity. Positive predictive value was 94.16% and negative predictive value was 98.52%. In cases with 4 and more lesions, malignancy is significantly more frequent and inconclusive findings significantly less frequent (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONWhile the costs of CEUS and CT in evaluating FLLs are comparable, CEUS examination is far more cost-effective in comparison to MRI.

Efficacy of Sonazoid (Perflubutane) for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Focal Breast Lesions: Phase 3 Multicenter Clinical Trial

The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using the ultrasound contrast agent Sonazoid (perflubutane) with unenhanced ultrasound and supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis (benign vs malignant) of focal breast lesions. The safety of Sonazoid was also assessed in this study. A total of 127 patients with focal breast lesions were enrolled in this study at five centers in Japan. Three reviewers who were blinded to the patient characteristics independently assessed the ultrasound images and MR images in a randomized sequence. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CEUS, unenhanced ultrasound, and supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI for the differential diagnosis were compared using generalized estimating equation analyses. Diagnostic confidence was also assessed. The accuracy of CEUS was significantly higher than that of unenhanced ultrasound (87.2% vs 65.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). In addition, CEUS showed significantly higher specificity, although the improvement in sensitivity was not statistically significant. The accuracy and specificity were significantly higher with CEUS than with contrast-enhanced MRI, but the improvement in sensitivity was not statistically significant. The area under the curve in a receiver operating characteristic analysis was significantly greater with CEUS than with unenhanced ultrasound. The incidence of adverse events was 11.4% and the incidence of adverse drug reactions was 3.3%. All adverse drug reactions were mild. CEUS using Sonazoid was confirmed to be superior to unenhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis (benign vs malignant) of focal breast lesions in terms of diagnostic accuracy with no serious adverse reactions.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhancement patterns in the diagnosis of adrenal tumors

Objective To explore the value of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant adrenal lesions.Methods Totally,57 adrenal lesions (26malignant and 31 benign) underwent conventional ultrasound and real-time CEUS.The enhancement patterns including types of time-intensity curve,centripetal fill-in,homogeneity and intensity of enhancement were analyzed.Results The enhancement pattern of normal adrenal gland was homogeneous,centrifugal and rapid perfusion from the medulla to the cortex.Four enhancement patterns were significantly different between benign and malignant adrenal lesions (P ＜0.05).If enhancement in the early arterial phase and rapid washout was suggestive of malignancy,the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 96.2％ and 77.4％,respectively.If peripheral to central filling was suggestive of malignancy,the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 76.9 ％ and 80.7 ％,respectively.Conclusions The patterns of real-time CEUS are helpful in differential diagnosis of malignant and benign adrenal lesions. Key words: Ultrasonography; Microbubbles; Adrenal gland neoplasms

CEUS in the differentiation between low and high-grade bladder carcinoma

IntroductionBladder cancer ranks 4th overall in the number of newly diagnosed cancers and 10th in causes of cancer deaths. More than 90% of all cases of bladder cancer are transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). The goal of this study is to confirm the usefulness of low mechanical index contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), also in association with time–intensity curves, in the differentiation between high- and low-grade bladder malignant lesions. Materials and methodsFrom February 2006 to February 2012 we recruited 144 patients. All patients underwent grayscale ultrasonography (US), color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Subsequently all patients underwent cystoscopy and TURB. ResultsHistological diagnoses were: 88 high-grade carcinomas (61.1%), and 56 low-grade carcinomas (38.9%). Sensitivity and specificity of CDUS were 87.5% (126/144) and 60%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 90.9% and 85.7%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of TIC were 91.6% (132/144) and 85.7%, respectively. Discussion and conclusionsCEUS is a reliable noninvasive method for differentiating low- and high-grade bladder carcinomas since it provides typical enhancement patterns as well as specific contrast-sonographic perfusion curves.