Specific Categories Of Patients Research Articles

Possible interactions between selected food processing and medications.

The impact of food processing on drug absorption, metabolism, and subsequent pharmacological activity is a pressing yet insufficiently explored area of research. Overlooking food-processing-drug interactions can significantly disrupt optimal clinical patient management. The challenges extend beyond merely considering the type and timing of food ingestion as to drug uptake; the specific food processing methods applied play a pivotal role. This study delves into both selected thermal and non-thermal food processing techniques, investigating their potential interference with the established pharmacokinetics of medications. Within the realm of thermal processing, conventional methods like deep fat frying, grilling, or barbecuing not only reduce the enteric absorption of drugs but also may give rise to side-products such as acrylamide, aldehydes, oxysterols, and oxyphytosterols. When produced in elevated quantities, these compounds exhibit enterotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects, potentially impacting the metabolism of various medications. Of note, a variety of thermal processing is frequently adopted during the preparation of diverse traditional herbal medicines. Conversely, circumventing high heat through innovative approaches (e.g., high-pressure processing, pulsed electric fields, plasma technology), opens new avenues to improve food quality, efficiency, bioavailability, and sustainability. However, it is crucial to exercise caution to prevent the excessive uptake of active compounds in specific patient categories. The potential interactions between food processing methods and their consequences, whether beneficial or adverse, on drug interactions can pose health hazards in certain cases. Recognizing this knowledge gap underscores the urgency for intensified and targeted scientific inquiry into the multitude of conceivable interactions among food composition, processing methods, and pharmaceutical agents. A thorough investigation into the underlying mechanisms is imperative. The complexity of this field requires substantial scrutiny and collaborative efforts across diverse domains, including medicine, pharmacology, nutrition, food science, food technology, and food engineering.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence.

Cardiac arrest (CA) is acommon and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting asubstantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide adefinitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.

Tranexamic Acid for Trauma Care: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Mortality and Thromboembolic Events in Severely Injured Patients

Introduction : Tranexamic Acid (TXA) is an anti-fibrinolytic agent that inhibits fibrinolysis and prevents blood clot breakdown. Widely used to manage hemorrhage in various clinical scenarios, including trauma, menorrhagia, bleeding in hemophilia, cardiac surgery, and orthopedic surgery, its impact on morbidity and mortality in severely injured patients necessitates an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Our study aimed to evaluate the association of TXA with mortality and thromboembolic events in trauma patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar up to July 2023, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult trauma patients receiving Tranexamic Acid (TXA) compared to standard care or placebo. Primary outcomes included mortality rates and thromboembolic event incidence. Statistical analyses used Review Manager Software (RevMan, version 5.3) with the Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model. Results : A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 36,416 patients were included in this meta-analysis, comparing Tranexamic Acid (TXA) to control (placebo or standard care). The mean age of the included patients was 39 years. The analysis focused on various patient categories, including multiple trauma versus predominantly traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, severely injured ( Injury Severity Score ,ISS ≥ 16, massive transfusion requirement, signs of shock) versus non-severely injured patients, blunt versus penetrating versus burn trauma, in-hospital versus prehospital TXA administration, and TXA administration within 3 hours versus beyond 3 hours of injury. The meta-analysis showed that TXA administration was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.27, p = 0.89), with moderate heterogeneity observed (I 2 = 56%). However, TXA use demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of thromboembolic events (odds ratio: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95, p = 0.0002), with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). (Figure 1 & 2) Conclusion TXA administration was not significantly associated with mortality in patients with significant trauma; however, it significantly reduced thromboembolic events, suggesting its potential benefit in preventing such complications. Further research is needed to explore its efficacy and safety in specific patient categories and administration settings to optimize its use in trauma care.

Increased Lipoprotein (a) and familial hypercholesterolemia: a dangerous combination.Data from a 12-year follow-up study

Abstract Background Lipoprotein (a)[Lp(a)] is a molecule characterized by very increased atherogenicity. Mounting evidence support the causal link between high Lp(a) concentration and atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease in the general population. Purpose The role of Lp (a) in specific categories of patients at high CV risk, such as patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), is also of special importance. The aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic role of Lp (a) regarding major adverse CV outcomes in subjects with heterozygous FH. Methods 155 patients from the outpatient lipid clinic of our hospital (56 males,mean age 41.2±14.2 years, 26% smokers, 16% with diabetes mellitus), without history of CV disease, who fulfilled the FH criteria participated in the study. Participants were evaluated for a mean follow-up period of 12.4±7.1 years with at least one annual visit. Venous blood samples were obtained at baseline in all patients for the determination of plasma glucose, lipid profile and levels of Lp(a). All subjects were on lipid-lowering medication during the follow-up period. The endpoint of our study was the composite of major CV events (coronary artery disease events and stroke). Results The incidence of the composite endpoint of major CV events during the follow-up period was 9% (n=14). In the total population, the mean baseline Lp (a) levels were 34.9±33.7 mg/dl, while 42% had increased Lp (a) levels ≥30mg/dl. The group of FH patients with new-onset CV disease had higher levels of Lp(a) at baseline compared to those without new-onset CV disease (48.1±37.3 vs 33.6±33.1 mg/dl, p=0.01). Also, those with new-onset CV disease had higher percentage of increased Lp(a) levels (≥30mg/dl) at baseline compared to those without development of CV disease (71% vs 39%, p=0.02).Multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that during the follow-up period independent predictors of major adverse CV events were:increased baseline Lp(a) levels(≥30mg/dl)(HR 5.61, 95% CI 1.51-10.92, p=0.01), male sex (HR 8.11, 95% CI 2.02-12.48, p<0.01), baseline low-density cholesterol levels (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p=0.04) and the presence of hypertension at baseline (HR 3.59, 95% CI 1.03-12.49, p=0.04), after adjustment for confounding factors. Conclusions In patients with FH, increased baseline Lp(a) is an independent predictor of adverse CV events, after a 12-year follow-up period. FH patients with Lp (a)levels ≥30mg/dl have an almost 5-fold greater CV risk compared to those with lower Lp (a) levels. It seems that Lp (a) reclassifies the already increased CV risk of FH subjects into an even higher level.

Genomic and Epidemiologic Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in the Pandemic Period: Sequencing Network of the Lazio Region, Italy.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, large-scale genomic sequencing has immediately pointed out that SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly mutated during the course of the pandemic, resulting in the emergence of variants with a public health impact. In this context, strictly monitoring the circulating strains via NGS has proven to be crucial for the early identification of new emerging variants and the study of the genomic evolution and transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Following national and international guidelines, the Lazio region has created a sequencing laboratory network (WGSnet-Lazio) that works in synergy with the reference center for epidemiological surveillance (SERESMI) to monitor the circulation of SARS-CoV-2. Sequencing was carried out with the aims of characterizing outbreak transmission dynamics, performing the genomic analysis of viruses infecting specific categories of patients (i.e., immune-depressed, travelers, and people with severe symptoms) and randomly monitoring variant circulation. Here we report data emerging from sequencing activities carried out by WGSnet-Lazio (from February 2020 to October 2022) linked with epidemiological data to correlate the circulation of variants with the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients. The model of the sequencing network developed in the Lazio region proved to be a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance and to support public health measures for epidemic containment.

Bypass surgery versus endovascular revascularization for occlusive infrainguinal peripheral artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.

To report a review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bypass surgery (BS) and endovascular treatment (ET) in infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) for several endpoints, such as major and minor amputation, major adverse limb events (MALEs), ulcer healing, time to healing, and all-cause mortality to support the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome (DFS). A MEDLINE and EMBASE search was performed to identify RCTs, published since 1991 up to June 21, 2023, enrolling patients with lower limb ischemia due to atherosclerotic disease (Rutherford I-VI). Any surgical BS or ET was allowed, irrespective of the approach, route, or graft employed, from iliac to below-the-knee district. Primary endpoint was major amputation rate. Secondary endpoints were amputation-free survival major adverse limb events (MALEs), minor amputation rate, all-cause mortality, ulcer healing rate, time to healing, pain, transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) or ankle-brachial index (ABI), quality of life, need for a new procedure, periprocedural serious adverse events (SAE; within 30days from the procedure), hospital lenght ofstay, and operative time. Twelve RCTs were included, one enrolled two separate cohorts of patients, and therefore, the studies included in the analyses were 13. Participants treated with ET had a similar rate of major amputations to participants treated with BS (MH-OR 0.85 [0.60, 1.20], p = 0.36); only one trial reported separately data on patients with diabetes (N = 1), showing no significant difference between ET and BS (MH-OR: 0.67 [0.09, 5.13], p = 0.70). For minor amputation, no between-group significant differences were reported: MH-OR for ET vs BS: 0.83 [0.21, 3.30], p = 0.80). No significant difference in amputation-free survival between the two treatment modalities was identified (MH-OR 0.94 [0.59, 1.49], p = 0.80); only one study reported subgroup analyses on diabetes, with a non-statistical trend toward reduction in favor of ET (MH-OR 0.62 [0.37, 1.04], p = 0.07). No significant difference between treatments was found for all-cause mortality (MH-OR for ET vs BS: 0.98 [0.80, 1.21], p = 0.88). A significantly higher rate of MALE was reported in participants treated with ET (MH-OR: 1.44 [1.05, 1.98], p = 0.03); in diabetes subgroup analysis showed no differences between-group for this outcome (MH-OR: 1.34 [0.76, 2.37], p = 0.30). Operative duration and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter for ET (WMD: - 101.53 [- 127.71, - 75.35] min, p < 0.001, and, - 4.15 [- 5.73, - 2.57] days, p < 0.001 =, respectively). ET was associated with a significantly lower risk of any SAE within 30days in comparison with BS (MH-OR: 0.60 [0.42, 0.86], p = 0.006). ET was associated with a significantly higher risk of reintervention (MH-OR: 1.57 [1.10, 2.24], p = 0.01). No significant between-group differences were reported for ulcer healing (MH-OR: 1.19 [0.53, 2.69], p = 0.67), although time to healing was shorter (- 1.00 [0.18, 1.82] months, p = 0.02) with BS. No differences were found in terms of quality of life and pain. ABI at the end of the study was reported by 7 studies showing a significant superiority of BS in comparison with ET (WMD: 0.09[0.02; 0.15] points, p = 0.01). The results of this meta-analysis showed no clear superiority of either ET or BS for the treatment of infrainguinal PAD also in diabetic patients. Further high-quality studies are needed, focusing on clinical outcomes, including pre-planned subgroup analyses on specific categories of patients, such as those with diabetes and detailing multidisciplinary team approach and structured follow-up.

The effect of a clock’s presence on trauma resuscitation times in a Dutch level-1 trauma center: a pre–post cohort analysis

PurposeInterventions performed within the first hour after trauma increase survival rates. Literature showed that measuring times can optimize the trauma resuscitation process as time awareness potentially reduces acute care time. This study examined the effect of a digital clock placement on trauma resuscitation times in an academic level-1 trauma center.MethodsA prospective observational pre–post cohort analysis was conducted for six months before and after implementing a visible clock in the trauma resuscitation room, indicating the time passed since starting the in-hospital resuscitation process. Trauma patients (age ≥ 16) presented during weekdays between 9.00 AM and 9.00 PM were included. Time until diagnostics (X-Ray, FAST, or CT scan), time until therapeutic intervention, and total resuscitation time were measured manually with a stopwatch by a researcher in the trauma resuscitation room. Patient characteristics and information regarding trauma- and injury type were collected. Times before and after clock implementation were compared.ResultsIn total, 100 patients were included, 50 patients in each cohort. The median total resuscitation time (including CT scan) was 40.3 min (IQR 23.3) in the cohort without a clock compared to 44.3 (IQR 26.1) minutes in the cohort with a clock. The mean time until the first diagnostic and until the CT scan was 8.3 min (SD 3.1) and 25.5 min (SD 7.1) without a clock compared to 8.6 min (SD 6.5) and 26.6 min (SD 11.5) with a clock. Severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16) showed a median resuscitation time in the cohort without a clock (n = 9) of 54.6 min (IQR 50.5) compared to 46.0 min (IQR 21.6) in the cohort with a clock (n = 8).ConclusionThis study found no significant reduction in trauma resuscitation time after clock placement. Nonetheless, the data represent a heterogeneous population, not excluding specific patient categories for whom literature has shown that a short time is essential, such as severely injured patients, might benefit from the presence of a trauma clock. Future research is recommended into resuscitation times of specific patient categories and practices to investigate time awareness.

Comparison of the status epilepticus severity score and the epidemiology-based mortality score in predicting 30-day mortality and status epilepticus cessation

ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and the Epidemiology-based Mortality score (EMSE) in predicting 30-day mortality and SE (Status epilepticus) cessation, and their prognostic performance in subgroups of patients with specific characteristics. MethodsWe reviewed consecutive episodes of SE occurring in patients aged ≥14 years at Baggiovara Civil Hospital (Modena, Italy) from 2013 to 2021. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of EMSE and STESS for 30-day mortality and SE cessation through stepwise regression binary logistic models adjusted for possible univariate clinical confounders. ResultsSeven hundred and eleven patients were enrolled. The mean value of STESS was 3.2 (SD 1.7) and of EMSE was 80.1 (SD 52.6). Within 30 days of the onset of SE, 28.4% of patients (202/711) died. EMSE had higher discriminatory ability for 30-day mortality compared with STESS (AUROC: 0.799; 95% CI: 0.765–0.832 versus 0.727; 95% CI: 0.686–0.766, respectively; p = 0.014). SE cessation within 1 h for convulsive SE and within 12 h for nonconvulsive SE was achieved in 35.3% (251/711) of patients. No significant difference was found between EMSE and STESS in discriminatory ability for SE cessation (AUROC: 0.516; 95% CI: 0.488–0.561 and 0.518; 95% CI: 0.473–0.563, respectively; p = 0.929). EMSE was superior to STESS in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with specific characteristics. No difference between the two scores was found in predicting SE cessation in subgroups of patients with specific characteristics. ConclusionsEMSE seems superior to STESS in predicting 30-day mortality, particularly in specific patient categories. Conversely, there is no difference in the ability of these scores in predicting SE cessation, which is overall rather low.

Italian oncologists and vaccinations against infectious diseases: Results of a survey of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology.

Patients with cancer present a higher risk of vaccine-preventable diseases. Recommended vaccinations are the most cost-effective measure to reduce the risk of transmission and related complications. Nevertheless, vaccination rates are inadequate. Oncologists have a central role in tailored vaccine communication to their patients. We present the results of a survey conducted by AIOM in 2022, focusing on the perception of the problem by oncologists. An anonymous 31-item online questionnaire was shared on 15 September 2022 on the AIOM website. The objectives of this survey were to examine the perception of Italian oncologists on vaccine-preventable diseases and the main available vaccines, their attitude towards recommending vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on their habits regarding vaccine-preventable diseases. Between September 2022 and January 2023, 114 medical oncologists (5% of the members) completed the anonymous questionnaire. At the first oncological visit, only 30% of respondents usually propose a vaccination schedule to all their patient, 41% do not usually discuss vaccinations at the first visit and 29% recommend vaccines exclusively to specific categories of patients. For 56% of respondents, patients are more aware of the benefits of vaccines, whereas 36% reported that patients are worried of receiving too many vaccines. This is the first survey conducted among Italian oncologists to better understand the perception and attitudes towards the vaccination. It highlights the urgent issues of educating and training oncologists in vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccine awareness and the need to build (or implement) a network of multidisciplinary collaborations.

Presepsin and procalcitonin as markers of infectious respiratory diseases in children: a protocol for a scoping review of the literature

Background: Presepsin is a new inflammatory marker used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of severe bacterial infections, which might be used in combination or substitution of other classical indexes such as procalcitonin. Presepsin has been studied mainly in specific categories of patients (generally adults, critically ill patients or neutropenic children) to identify severe bacterial infections and to predict the mortality risk, while the role of this marker in discriminating bacterial from viral infections in otherwise healthy children of different age groups is less examined. This scoping review aims to better explore available evidence around the potential role of presepsin in pediatric respiratory infectious diseases, analyzing its ability to distinguish the severity and type of respiratory pathology and comparing it with a classic inflammation index such as procalcitonin. Methods: We started our research in February 2023 in the following bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and SCOPUS. The main review question will be “What is known about the diagnostic role of presepsin and/or procalcitoninin the differential diagnosis of respiratory tract infection’s severity and etiology?” We will include randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, performed on children and adolescents (younger than 18 years), hospitalized or not, with a confirmed diagnosis of upper and/or lower respiratory infectious disease. We will include children diagnosed with pneumonia, bronchiolitis, bronchitis, croup, and other types of infectious respiratory diseases. To report our findings, we will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Dissemination: The findings of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented in national and international conferences.

Review of ESPEN-2021 Practice Guidelines for Patients with Cancer. Part 2: Interventions Relevant to Specific Patient Categories

This study further discussed the 2021 ESPEN practical recommendations for nutritional support in oncology. The updated version of the 2021 ESPEN practice guidelines differs slightly from the 2017 version and contains flowcharts to facilitate the use of the guidelines in clinical practice, which is also relevant for domestic healthcare. ESPEN-2021 Clinical Guidelines, which offer practical solutions in all areas of oncology, are significant to both oncologists and allied specialists working in oncology. The second part of the review discusses particular issues of nutritional support for patients with cancer and analyzes the domestic experience of their use. The review provides the main protocols for artificial nutrition in surgery, during irradiation, and in drug therapy in patients in remission and at the palliative stage and proves the need to maintain physical activity in patients with cancer. The presented practical guidance allows organizing an adequate supply of nutrient substrates to patients with cancer receiving various types of anticancer treatment, in remission, and at the stage of palliative care.

Thirty years of hemovigilance - achievements and future perspectives.

Since its emergence in the early 1990s, hemovigilance has gradually evolved from a blood safety concept focused on surveillance of adverse reactions and events in patients, to a well-defined system that monitors the entire transfusion chain and improves its safety. The importance of hemovigilance has been recognized globally in a relatively short time, but the level of its implementation varies significantly between countries. The cooperation of international organizations has significantly contributed to the promotion, implementation, and education in this field. Thanks to initiatives taken, the safety of transfusion practice has been improved in many segments, primarily related to the risks of adverse events in recipients of blood components. In parallel with changing transfusion practice, the hemovigilance process has also matured. In addition to the reduction of existing risks and the early detection of emerging risks, hemovigilance has also embraced the principles of patient blood management. Research in hemovigilance is more increasingly focused on specific categories of patients, specific blood components and methods of their preparation, rare reactions, and transfusion efficacy and efficiency. A proactive approach and use of big data can play an important role in achieving these goals. Additional and sustained efforts should be made to prevent underreporting of events and to improve data comparability through clear definitions and grading systems. This review provides a historical overview of hemovigilance and its achievements, current challenges, and future plans.

Endometrial Scratching for Improving Endometrial Receptivity: a Critical Review of Old and New Clinical Evidence.

Endometrial scratching is intentional injury of the endometrium intended to improve the reproductive outcomes of infertile women who seek pregnancy. In recent years, several randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses of trials have been published, reporting controversial results. Some authors have recommended against endometrial scratching in clinical practice, while others have recommended its application to specific categories of patients. This article aimed to provide a critical analysis of the old and new available evidence, to assist physicians interpreting the published data, and to generate insights for future research on the topic.

Intravenous Lidocaine for Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Neuropathic pain is a widespread problem with a big impact on quality of life. The currently used drug regimens are often insufficiently effective or cause - sometimes unacceptable - side effects. Intravenous lidocaine could be an alternative treatment, by blocking spontaneous depolarization and hyperexcitability in upregulated sodium channels in nociceptors. Research so far has shown varying results but the treatment protocols differed a lot and follow-up was usually short. In our hospital, lidocaine infusions have been applied for many years in a unique treatment protocol consisting of a relatively high dose of lidocaine (1000 mg) administered over 25 hours. Our aim is to share information on both the efficacy and safety of this treatment schedule. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in all patients who received a lidocaine infusion between January 2014 and January 2018. The standard infusion protocol consists of a total of 1000 mg lidocaine administered intravenously during 25 hours (40 mg/hour). Pain diagnoses were stratified into 15 groups, in agreement with diagnoses used in daily practice. Effectiveness of the treatment was classified as effect or no effect based on the description found in the chart. We included 282 patients, with a median age of 58 years and 64% of whom were female. Patients with myofascial pain syndrome, peripheral (mono)neuropathy, small fiber neuropathy and vascular disease benefited most. Patients with cancer pain, postherpetic neuralgia, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and radicular pain showed the least pain improvement. There were no serious adverse events. In selected patients, lidocaine infusions may be a safe and efficacious treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. More prospective research is needed to further determine the optimal dosing, duration and interval of lidocaine infusion therapy, and to better understand in which specific patient categories this treatment is most beneficial.

Time to reconcile research findings and clinical practice on upper limb neurorehabilitation.

The problemIn the field of upper limb neurorehabilitation, the translation from research findings to clinical practice remains troublesome. Patients are not receiving treatments based on the best available evidence. There are certainly multiple reasons to account for this issue, including the power of habit over innovation, subjective beliefs over objective results. We need to take a step forward, by looking at most important results from randomized controlled trials, and then identify key active ingredients that determined the success of interventions. On the other hand, we need to recognize those specific categories of patients having the greatest benefit from each intervention, and why. The aim is to reach the ability to design a neurorehabilitation program based on motor learning principles with established clinical efficacy and tailored for specific patient's needs.Proposed solutionsThe objective of the present manuscript is to facilitate the translation of research findings to clinical practice. Starting from a literature review of selected neurorehabilitation approaches, for each intervention the following elements were highlighted: definition of active ingredients; identification of underlying motor learning principles and neural mechanisms of recovery; inferences from research findings; and recommendations for clinical practice. Furthermore, we included a dedicated chapter on the importance of a comprehensive assessment (objective impairments and patient's perspective) to design personalized and effective neurorehabilitation interventions.ConclusionsIt's time to reconcile research findings with clinical practice. Evidence from literature is consistently showing that neurological patients improve upper limb function, when core strategies based on motor learning principles are applied. To this end, practical take-home messages in the concluding section are provided, focusing on the importance of graded task practice, high number of repetitions, interventions tailored to patient's goals and expectations, solutions to increase and distribute therapy beyond the formal patient-therapist session, and how to integrate different interventions to maximize upper limb motor outcomes. We hope that this manuscript will serve as starting point to fill the gap between theory and practice in upper limb neurorehabilitation, and as a practical tool to leverage the positive impact of clinicians on patients' recovery.

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neonates and Children with Special High-Risk Conditions: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.

Surgical site infections (SSIs), which are a potential complications in surgical procedures, are associated with prolonged hospital stays and increased postoperative mortality rates, and they also have a significant economic impact on health systems. Data in literature regarding risk factors for SSIs in pediatric age are scarce, with consequent difficulties in the management of SSI prophylaxis and with antibiotic prescribing attitudes in the various surgical procedures that often tend to follow individual opinions. The lack of pediatric studies is even more evident when we consider surgeries performed in subjects with underlying conditions that may pose an increased risk of complications. In order to respond to this shortcoming, we developed a consensus document to define optimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in neonates and children with specific high-risk conditions. These included the following: (1) colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria other than MRSA; (2) allergy to first-line antibiotics; (3) immunosuppression; (4) splenectomy; (5) comorbidity; (6) ongoing antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis; (7) coexisting infection at another site; (8) previous surgery in the last month; and (9) presurgery hospitalization lasting more than 2 weeks. This work, made possible by the multidisciplinary contribution of experts belonging to the most important Italian scientific societies, represents, in our opinion, the most up-to-date and comprehensive collection of recommendations relating to behaviors to be undertaken in a perioperative site in the presence of specific categories of patients at high-risk of complications during surgery. The application of uniform and shared protocols in these high-risk categories will improve surgical practice with a reduction in SSIs and consequent rationalization of resources and costs, as well as being able to limit the phenomenon of antimicrobial resistance.

Transfusion practice in the bleeding critically ill: An international online survey-The TRACE-2 survey.

BackgroundTransfusion is very common in the intensive care unit (ICU), but practice is highly variable, as has recently been shown in non‐bleeding critically ill patients practices survey. Bleeding patients in ICU require different blood products across a range of specific patient categories. We hypothesize that a large variety in transfusion practice exists in bleeding patients.Study design and methodsAn international online survey was performed among physicians working in the ICU. Transfusion practice in massively and non‐massively bleeding patients was examined, including transfusion ratios, thresholds, and the presence of transfusion guidelines.ResultsSix hundred eleven respondents filled in the survey of which 401 could be analyzed, representing 64 countries. Among the respondents, 52% had a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) available at their ICU. In massively bleeding patients, 46% of the respondents used fixed transfusion component ratios. Of those who used fixed blood ratios, the 1:1:1 ratio (red blood cell [RBC] concentrates: plasma: platelet concentrates) was most commonly used (33%). The presence of an MTP was associated with a more frequent use of fixed ratios (p < .001). For RBC transfusion in the general non‐massively bleeding ICU population, a hemoglobin (Hb) threshold of 7.0[7.0–7.3] g/dl was reported. In the general ICU population, a platelet count threshold of 50[26–50] × 109/L was applied.DiscussionHalf of the centers had no massive transfusion protocol available. Transfusion practice in massively bleeding critically ill patients is highly variable and driven by the presence of an MTP. In the general non‐massively bleeding ICU population restrictive transfusion triggers were chosen.

Anti-hypertensive drugs deprescribing: an updated systematic review of clinical trials

BackgroundPolypharmacy is defined as the prescription of at least 5 different medicines for therapeutic or prophylactic effect and is a serious issue among elderly patients, who are frequently affected by multi-morbidity. Deprescribing is one of the proposed approaches to reduce the number of administered drugs, by eliminating those that are inappropriately prescribed. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an updated and systematic assessment of the benefit-risk profile of deprescribing of anti-hypertensive drugs, which are among the most commonly used drugs.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies assessing the efficacy and safety of anti-hypertensive drugs deprescribing in the period between January, 12,016 and December, 312,019. The quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was assessed using the GRADE approach for the evaluation of the main outcomes. The risk of bias assessment was carried out using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.ResultsOverall, two RCTs were identified. Despite summarized evidence was in favor of anti-hypertensive deprescribing, the overall risk of bias was rated as high for each RCT included. According to the GRADE approach, the overall quality of the RCTs included was moderate regarding the following outcomes: systolic blood pressure < 150 mmHg after 12 weeks of follow-up, quality of life, frailty and cardiovascular risk.ConclusionsThis updated systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anti-hypertensive treatment deprescribing found two recently published RCTs, in addition to the previous guideline of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Evidence points towards non-inferiority of anti-hypertensive deprescribing as compared to treatment continuation, despite the quality of published studies is not high. High quality experimental studies are urgently needed to further assess the effect of deprescribing for this drug class in specific categories of patients.

"Modern approaches for antiandrogen-resistant prostate cancer therapy

Prostate cancer represents the leading malignant tumor in men over 50 years of age with 400,000 new cases being diagnosed yearly in Europe. Even if the incidence rate is higher than the mortality rate, still there is an increasing trend when speaking of its mortality. The increasing incidence of the metabolic syndrome, the unhealthy lifestyle, the high lipid and Calcium intake, the high spread of infections with Human Papilloma Virus, Human Herpes Virus, the excess of androgen consumption and the longer life expectancy, are few of the main causes of prostate cancer increasing incidence. The new systemic therapies such as immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors or Poly, ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors and local experimental procedures addressing tumor destruction, such as High- Intensity Focused Ultrasound, the Cryo and Focal Laser Ablation, provide good outcomes and become new promising tools for prostate cancer therapy. Physicians consider these methods worth using; the efficacy of some specific categories of patients being arguments for their use in the current protocols even though solid data regarding the improvement of global mortality rates are not yet published. The current article focuses on the newest systemic and local experimental treatment tools highlighting their benefits, especially for hormone-resistant prostate cancer.

Strong and sustainable primary healthcare is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization in high risk patients

In 2004, Germany introduced a program based on voluntary contracting to strengthen the role of general practice care in the healthcare system. Key components include structured management of chronic diseases, coordinated access to secondary care, data-driven quality improvement, computerized clinical decision-support, and capitation-based reimbursement. Our aim was to determine the long-term effects of this program on the risk of hospitalization of specific categories of high-risk patients. Based on insurance claims data, we conducted a longitudinal observational study from 2011 to 2018 in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Patients were assigned to one or more of four open cohorts (in 2011, elderly, n = 575,363; diabetes mellitus, n = 163,709; chronic heart failure, n = 82,513; coronary heart disease, n = 125,758). Adjusted for key patient characteristics, logistic regression models were used to compare the hospitalization risk of the enrolled patients (intervention group) with patients receiving usual primary care (control group). At the start of the study and throughout long-term follow-up, enrolled patients in the four cohorts had a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization and ambulatory, care-sensitive hospitalization. Among patients with chronic heart failure and coronary heart disease, the program was associated with significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations across the eight observed years. The effect of the program also increased over time. Over the longer term, the results indicate that strengthening primary care could be associated with a substantial reduction in hospital utilization among high-risk patients.