In this research, in order to compare and select the optimum patterns, two parameters of specific charge and specific drilling are used. Two explosive substances, including ammonium nitrate and fuel oil (ANFO) and Amulet, are used to charge the holes located on the cross-section of the tunnels in order to advance by 3 meters. Also, the cross-section of the selected tunnels was 19, 28, 32, 40, 48, 50, 65, and 76 square meters with horseshoe, circle and D-shaped. The diameter of the explosive hole is 48 mm for the Norwegian method and 51 mm for the two energy balance models and the Swedish method to compare them. A total of 160 designs are prepared for three types of limestone, sandstone and marl. The results obtained for two parameters of specific charge and special drilling for the selected rock material are completely opposite. Also, in the Swedish methods, according to the Amulet, the values of the calculated parameters are close to the energy balance model. Finally, according to the geomechanical parameters of the rock, for the Swedish method and the energy balance model in charging with amulet explosives, the energy balance model and the Holemberg-Persson method are proposed in the optimal design for the tunnel drilling and blasting pattern. In addition, for the Norwegian method and the energy balance model in charging the holes with ANFO, the energy balance model is prior to the Norwegian method. The amount of stemming of holes in different parts of the tunnel face is less for the Swedish method than the Norwegian and energy balance models.
Read full abstract