Specialists In Private Practice Research Articles

Medical specialists’ use and opinion of video consultation in Denmark: a survey study

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telemedicine which is seen as a possibility to reduce the pressure on healthcare systems globally. However, little research has been carried out on video as a consultation medium in medical specialists’ practice. This study investigated the use of and opinion on video consultation among specialists in Denmark.MethodsAn online survey on use of video consultation, as well as relevance of and opinion on video consultation, was distributed to all 963 medical specialists in private practice in Denmark throughout May and June 2022, resulting in 499 complete answers (response rate: 51.8%). Data were analysed using descriptive and logistic regression analyses, and data from open text fields were analysed using thematic network analysis.ResultsAmong the respondents, 62.2% had never used video consultation, while 23.4% were currently using video consultation, most particularly among psychiatrists. A total of 47.3% found video consultation medically irrelevant to their specialty, especially radiologists, plastic surgeons, ophthalmologists and otorhinolaryngologists. According to the specialists, video consultation was most suitable for follow-up consultations and simple medical issues, where the patient had an established diagnosis. In these cases, mutual trust remained present in video consultations. Better access for the patients and fewer cancellations, especially for psychiatrists, were highlighted as benefits. IT problems were reported as obstacles hindering optimal use of video consultation.ConclusionThe political aspiration to digitization in healthcare systems should be rooted in professionals’ and patients’ perceptions and experiences with video consultation which emphasize that it is not a standard tool for all consultations.

Follow-up outpatient clinics for patients with post COVID: a survey to assess and characterize aspects of care

After acute infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, up to 10 % of affected individuals suffer from long-term health impairments, also referred to as "Post-COVID". In Germany, specialized outpatient clinics have been established to care for patients with Post-COVID. A structured survey of the care situation is not yet available, but essential for a demand-oriented care. The present study aimed to systematically assess and describe structural and process-related aspects of care, and to perform an inventory and needs analysis of Post-COVID outpatient clinics in Germany.An online survey was developed assessing the structure and organization of the outpatient clinics, service offerings and networking of care from the perspective of the outpatient clinic directors. A total of 95 outpatient clinics were identified, and an invitation to participate in the online survey was sent via e-mail to the directors of the outpatient clinics. Data were collected between February and May 2022. Descriptive data analysis was performed.A total of 28 outpatient clinic managers (29 %) took part in the survey. Participants were between 32 and 66 years old, and 61 % (n = 17) were male. The outpatient clinics were most frequently affiliated with the specialties of pneumology (n = 10; 36 %), internal medicine, psychiatric and psychosomatic medicine, and neurology (n = 8; 29 %, respectively). Among the outpatient clinic directors, 64 % (n = 18) stated that the time spent waiting for an appointment was more than one month. Utilization (n = 25; 89 %), appointment demand (n = 26; 93 %), and the need for more Post-COVID outpatient clinics (n = 20; 71 %) were rated as high by the outpatient clinic directors. Nearly all directors reported networking with in-clinic facilities (n = 27; 96 %), with primary care physicians and with specialists in private practice (n = 21; 75 %, respectively).The main focus of care is pneumology. Internal medicine, psychiatry/psychosomatics and neurology are also equally represented. Our data further suggest a high demand for Post-COVID outpatient clinics and the need to expand this care offer.

The assessment of quality of care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort in the District of Landeck in Austria

IntroductionStructured diabetes care based on evidence-based guidelines is one of the main strategies to improve glycemic control and to reduce long-term complications in diabetes mellitus. MethodsThis study is based on the “Diabetes-Landeck Cohort”, a population-based cohort of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM). We assessed the quality of diabetes care and compared it between three groups of care units, that is, general practitioners (GP), diabetes specialists in private practice (DSPP), and hospitals (HOSP). ResultsThe total study population comprised 1616 patients with T2DM, including 378 patients of GP, 281 of DSPP, and 957 from HOSP. We identified statistically significant differences: DSPP showed the highest percentage of structured training, sufficient training, eye examinations and foot examinations. The group HOSP showed the highest proportion for increased HbA1c≥ 7.5 and almost all long-term complications surveyed, that is, nephropathy (23.2%), neuropathy (14.4%), diabetic foot (5.1%), and cerebrovascular diseases (10.9%). ConclusionThis population-based cohort study on patients with T2DM in Austria showed significant differences in important quality-of-care process and outcome parameters across different groups of care units. Future research should also include prediction modeling for early warning and monitoring systems as well as adjustment for patient characteristics and duration and severity of disease.

“It's not a one operation fits all”: A qualitative study exploring fee setting and participation in price transparency initiatives amongst medical specialists in the Australian private healthcare sector

The Australian government, through Medicare, defines the type of medical specialist services it covers and subsidizes, but it does not regulate prices. Specialists in private practice can charge more than the fee listed by Medicare depending on what they feel ‘the market will bear’. This can sometimes result in high and unexpected out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for patients. To reduce pricing uncertainty and ‘bill shock’ faced by consumers, the government introduced a price transparency website in December 2019. It is not clear how effective such a website will be and whether specialists and patients will use it. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore factors influencing how specialists set their fees, and their views on and participation in price transparency initiatives. We conducted 27 semi-structured interviews with surgical specialists. We analysed the data using thematic analysis and responses were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior model. We identified several patient, specialist and system-level factors influencing fee setting. Patient-level factors included patient characteristics, circumstance, complexity, and assumptions regarding perceived value of care. Specialist-level factors included perceived experience and skills, ethical considerations, and gendered-behavior. System-level factors included the Australian Medical Association recommended price list, practice costs, and supply and demand factors including perceived competition and practice location. Specialists were opposed to price transparency websites and lacked motivation to participate because of the complexity of fee setting, concerns over unintended consequences, and feelings of frustration they were being singled out. If price transparency websites are to be pursued, specialists' lack of motivation to participate needs to be addressed.

Changes in weekly working hours, proportion of doctors with hours above the limitations of European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and time spent on direct patient care for doctors in Norway from 2016 to 2019: a study based on repeated surveys

ObjectivesTo compare the total weekly working hours, proportions with work hours above the limitations of European working time directive (EWTD) and time spent on direct patient care in 2016 and...

Zum Stand der intersektoralen Behandlung in der HNO-Heilkunde in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage*

The German Healthcare System is currently subject of significant structural changes. Due to politic influences it is obvious that more and more even complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures will be performed in an office setting or as day treatments. This is due to the high rate of hospital treatments in Germany compared to other OECD countries. A revision of the healthcare system will include both, ambulatory and hospital treatments, which will only be possible with some new structures for this "intersectoral" treatment. Currently there are no data available on the status, possibilities and structure of the "intersectoral" treatment in ENT in Germany. To get an overview on the possibilities for an "intersectoral" treatment in ENT in Germany a survey was conducted. Each chariman of an ENT clinic/Department and all ENT specialists in private practice were contacted and got a questionnaire. The evaluation was performed differently for chairmen of an ENT department, ENT specialists in private practice without and with a ward for inpatients in hospitals. 4,548 questionnaires were mailed. Out of them 493 were filled and came back (10.8%). The return rate in the group of ENT Department chairmen was with 52.9% even higher. "Intersectoral" for physicians in hospitals means that they are usually working with a personal authorization by the local Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, ENT specialists in private practice usually with a ward for inpatient authorization in a hospital. Appropriate structures for an intersectoral organization of patients´s treatment are currently missing. Both, ENT Department chairmen and ENT specialists in private practice declared the current remuneration system for ambulatory and day surgery as completely inaedequate and is urgently to be revised. Beside this, ENT Department chairmen declared problems with the emergency care of patients with complications operated on outside the hospital, problems with the continuing education of residents and with information transfer. They request that hospital specialists should be allowed to work in the contractual medical care of outpatients without a restriction. ENT specialists in private practice mentioned positively the good cooperation possibilities with hospital physicians, knowledge sharing, and wide ranges of indications in the ENT Departments. Negative points could be possible worse information sharing when there is no distinct contact person in the ENT Departments, a possible competitive situation between ENT Departments and specialists in private practice, and sometimes long waiting times for the patients. The German health care system is currently facing a radical reform with the overcoming of traditional rigid and inflexible sectors in outpatient care and inpatient hospital care. To achieve this, the intersectoral patient treatment should play the key role. "Intersectoral" means that the whole process of patient care from diagnosis to therapy is closely interlinked and can also be managed by the same physicians, no matter whether they are working as spcialists in an ENT-Department in a hospital or in private practice. However, currently there are no appropriate structures available to achieve this goal. Beside creating structural conditions for intersectoral treatment the current remuneration system for outpatient procedures and dayclinic treatments must be renewed in a way to cover all the costs. Further conditions are the development of good cooperation models between ENT Departments and specialists in private practice, and the possibility for hospital ENT physicians to work in the contractual medical care of outpatients without a restriction. Intersectoral patient care must take the quality management, the continuing education of residents and the patient safety under consideration.

My Health Record (and E-scripts): essential new resource for physicians-a personal perspective.

From a personal perspective of an endocrinologist in private practice: Integration of the My Health Record into everyday clinical practice is time- and cost-saving, allows for more accurate record keeping and most importantly improves overall patient care. The main deficiency at present is incomplete uptake by medical specialists in private and public practice, as well as pathology and imaging service providers.We will all reap the benefits as these entities become engaged and contribute towards making this electronic medical record truly universal.

More and better clinical trials in health care: focusing on people, not just systems and processes.

More and better clinical trials in health care: focusing on people, not just systems and processes.

Protocol for a cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial of the effect of direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy for adults with musculoskeletal pain

BackgroundIn the Danish healthcare system, direct access to physiotherapy is an option, but public subsidy for treatment requires referral from a general practitioner. To relieve general practice of unnecessary consultations and provide patients with easier access to relevant treatment, direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy has been suggested. MethodsDirect access to subsidized physiotherapy will be evaluated in a controlled design and has a duration of one year. Physiotherapy clinics invite eligible patients to participate in the evaluation. Participants complete questionnaires at baseline and six weeks and six months after baseline. Physical health status (ShortForm-12v2) is the primary outcome. In addition, the evaluation will assess the use of services in general practice, physiotherapy, specialists in private practice and hospitals and referrals to diagnostic imaging. A process evaluation will assess the attitude to and implementation of direct access to subsidized physiotherapy through the experiences and attitudes of local general practitioners, secretaries and physiotherapists in participating clinics. DiscussionThis intervention may affect the point of entry to health care services. For the intervention group the physiotherapists assume responsibility in symptom assessment. During recruitment registration of red flags in physiotherapy is closely monitored. The results of the study may be used to assess if direct access to subsidized physiotherapy is a way to relieve the workload in general practice while maintaining or improving patient level outcomes. Trial registrationThe project was reported to The Committee on Health Research Ethics of the Capital Region of Denmark with protocol number J.nr.: H-19074802. The Committee assessed the project as not registrable and therefore can be implemented without further permission. This trial has been registered at the Danish Data Protection Agency (J.nr.: P-2019-672). The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifiers: NCT04900480).

Impact of COVID-19 on Continuing Medical Education-Results of an Online Survey Among Users of a Non-profit Multi-Specialty Live Online Education Platform.

Background: The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic accelerated digitalization in medical education. Continuing medical education (CME) as a substantial component of this system was relevantly affected. Here, we present the results of an online survey highlighting the impact on and the role of online CME.Methods: An online survey of 44 questions was completed by users of a German online CME platform receiving an invitation via newsletter. CME habits, requirements, personal perception, and impact of the pandemic were inquired. Standard statistical methods were applied.Results: A total of 2,961 responders took the survey with 2,949 completed surveys included in the final analysis. Most contributions originated from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Physicians accounted for 78.3% (57.5% hospital doctors) of responses followed by midwives (7.3%) and paramedics (5.7%). Participating physicians were mainly board-certified specialists (69%; 55.75% hospital specialists, 13.25% specialists in private practice). Frequent online lectures at regular intervals (77.8%) and combined face-to-face and online CME (55.9%) were favored. A duration of 1–2 h was found ideal (57.5%). Technical issues were less a major concern since the pandemic.Conclusion: A shift from face-to-face toward online CME events was expectedly detected since the outbreak. Online CME was accelerated and promoted by the pandemic. According to the perception of users, the CME system appears to have reacted adequately to meet their demand but does not replace human interaction.

Outpatient specialist medical treatment (ASV)-a new treatment level in rheumatology

Since April 2018, the new third level care model of outpatient specialist care (ASV) according to §116b of the Social Code Book V (SGBV) has been available for patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany. Not only is amultiprofessional cooperation between the disciplines involved in treating rheumatic diseases promoted but also the cooperation between specialized rheumatologists and other specialists in private practice and in hospitals is encouraged. As budget capping limiting services and number of cases do not apply in ASV, asignificant improvement of patient care in rheumatology is expected due to an increase in provider capacity. At the end of May 2019, 72rheumatologists in the first 9newly approved ASV teams had qualified for this new care concept. Bureaucratic obstacles have so far delayed the implementation of ASV. Difficulties arose in building ateam with different specialties, in the process of registration of the teams and the assessment of the registration by certain regional boards responsible for access control. The national associations of rheumatologists, the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh), the VRA (Verband der Rheumatologischen Akutkliniken e. V.) and the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) campaign for an easier admission of providers to the ASV and for adequate financing of all specialties involved in the ASV. The aim is to realize the chance of the ASV for better rheumatological care nationwide with shorter waiting times for amedical appointment and abetter cooperation between specialists.

Establishment of fracture liaison services in Germany

Osteoporosis results in fragility fractures that are associated with ahigh morbidity and mortality as well as an increased risk for subsequent fragility fractures. Thus, the first fragility fracture should be the last. To achieve this goal patients need treatment of osteoporosis according to the prevailing clinical guidelines. This article presents the current clinical care situation of patients with amanifest osteoporosis in Germany and the accompanying risks. As apossible solution the concept of afracture liaison service (FLS) as anew intersectoral care concept is presented and options for the establishment of FLS in Germany are provided. Aliterature search (PubMed) was conducted using key terms. The practical experiences of the authors in the context of establishing an FLS were also considered. Compared to other countries, in Germany only aminority of patients receive treatment for osteoporosis after fragility fractures. To improve the care situation an intersectoral FLS provides acoordinated referral of patients with fragility fractures from inpatient care in hospitals to specialists in private practice. This enables the strict identification and treatment of high-risk patients according to the prevailing clinical guidelines. In Germany, different options exist to structure an FLS under consideration of the local circumstances. In Germany, FLS should be established nationwide and according to uniform standards. This would significantly improve the quality of clinical care of patients with manifest osteoporosis.

Study on outpatient utilization of an ENT-clinic in arural region: elective patients

In Germany medical care of outpatients is mainly provided by general practitioners and medical specialists in private practice. The outpatient departments of hospitals are available for patients under defined circumstances, such as by referral from aspecialist or for oncological diseases (§116b). The aim of this investigation was the evaluation of the elective outpatient cases. The prospective study started in April 2013 and ended in March 2014. All elective outpatients were analyzed according to several items, such as personal and medical data, the reason, time and justification for presentation. All in all 6463elective patients were enrolled in this study. Children and the older patients were quantitatively more represented than the emergency patients. With respect to adefined score the majority of referrals were medically reasonable (87%), which correlated positively with the travelling distance to the patient's home. This investigation emphasizes the usefulness of the German dual principle of specialist patient care that contributes to medically appropriate utilization of healthcare resources, which is not the case for emergency patients with a free choice of destination.

Socioeconomic Status and Use of Outpatient Medical Care: The Case of Germany.

BackgroundSocially disadvantaged people have an increased need for medical care due to a higher burden of health problems and chronic diseases. In Germany, outpatient care is chiefly provided by office-based general practitioners and specialists in private practice. People are free to choose the physician they prefer. In this study, national data were used to examine differences in the use of outpatient medical care by socioeconomic status (SES).MethodsThe analyses were based on data from 6,754 participants in the Robert Koch Institute’s German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) aged between 18 and 69 years. The number of outpatient physician visits during the past twelve months was assessed for several medical specializations. SES was determined based on education, occupation, and income. Associations between SES and physician visits were analysed using logistic regression and zero-truncated negative binomial regression for count data.ResultsAfter adjusting for sociodemographic factors and health indicators, outpatients with low SES had more contacts with general practitioners than outpatients with high SES (men: incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08–1.46; women: IRR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.07–1.34). The use of specialists was lower in people with low SES than in those with high SES when sociodemographic factors and health indicators were adjusted for (men: odds ratio [OR] = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.51–0.91; women: OR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.41–0.77). This applied particularly to specialists in internal medicine, dermatology, and gynaecology. The associations remained after additional adjustment for the type of health insurance and the regional density of office-based physicians.ConclusionThe findings suggest that socially disadvantaged people are seen by general practitioners more often than the socially better-off, who are more likely to visit a medical specialist. These differences may be due to differences in patient preferences, physician factors, physician-patient interaction, and potential barriers to accessing specialist care.

Survey of otorhinolaryngologists on their clinical examinations performed in patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing

There is currently no standardized ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinical examination for patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). As a result, there are large inter-individual differences in the examinations due to an inadequate estimation of the relevance of certain anatomic sites. We aimed to identify which examinations/dynamic tests are considered most relevant by German ENT physicians. A questionnaire was designed, evaluating 23 anatomic sites/dynamic tests of the upper aero-digestive tract. The questionnaire was sent to all German ENT departments (n = 153), including universities and other tertiary or secondary referral centers, by postal mail. In addition, almost all private ENT specialists registered with the German professional association (n = 2496) were contacted via e-mail. Participants assessed how often they examined the sites/dynamic tests, subjective importance, and the impact on the therapeutic procedure. A mean score of relevance (mSOR) was generated (minimum score 1; maximum score 75) from these three items. The response rate for hospitals was 58.8 %; while, it was 4.1 % for ENT specialists in private practice. Therefore, the total response rate was 7.3 %. Of the 23 assessed items, some showed a high overall relevance, such as the tonsils (mSOR 64.75), webbing (mSOR 58.14), uvula (mSOR 55.12), or tongue base (mSOR 53.99). Other examinations, such as simulated snoring (mSOR 19.34) or the Mueller maneuver (mSOR 18.98), were estimated as less relevant. Our data reflect the assessment of German otorhinolaryngologists on the clinical examination of SDB patients. The results should be considered as a basis for compiling a standardized procedure.

Patients with personality disorders in private specialist practice.

Private practitioners with contracts with the regional health authorities have an important place among the treatment options provided by the psychiatric specialist health service. Little information is available on the part such specialists in private practice should play in the treatment of patients with personality disorders. This study describes private practitioners' experiences with this patient group and the patients' satisfaction with the treatment. 46 patients were referred to specialists in private practice as part of a treatment study of patients with personality disorders. 26 private practitioners took part. The patient population had extensive problems with a high level of symptoms, interpersonal difficulties and poor work functioning. A follow-up investigation of the patient group was conducted after three years. The therapists answered questionnaires about their own practices and the patient therapy. At the time of the three-year follow-up, a third of the patients were still in therapy. The median number of therapy sessions was 43 (range 2-258 hours). On the whole, the therapists found the treatments interesting from a professional point of view, and the majority of the patients were satisfied with the therapy. Some treatments were complicated by irregular attendance, substance abuse, risk of suicide or other serious symptoms. 29 % of the patients were dissatisfied with the therapy, particularly patients with substance abuse. Psychotherapy with a specialist in private practice with a contract with regional health authorities allows for flexibility with respect to the duration of treatment for patients with a personality disorder. Substance abuse problems and acting-out behaviour present a challenge to treatment which may be difficult to handle in private practice. Treatment in private specialist practice presupposes the possibility of acute hospitalisation or access to other health services in the event of crises and complicating substance abuse.

Access to digital radiology imaging and the impact on specialists in private practice

Access to digital radiology imaging and the impact on specialists in private practice

Medical nowcasting using Google trends: application in otolaryngology

Google Trends is a valuable new additional tool for medical research, mainly for epidemiological and economical issues, which is fast and inexpensive to use and may be especially helpful when analyzing patient collectives who go to general practitioners or specialists in private practice rather than public or university clinics, where data for statistics are most often collected from.

An empirical analysis of public and private medical practice in Australia

The combination of public and private medical practice is widespread in many health systems and has important consequences for health care cost and quality. However, its forms and prevalence vary widely and are poorly understood. This paper examines factors associated with public and private sector work by medical specialists using a nationally representative sample of Australian doctors. We find considerable variations in the practice patterns, remuneration contracts and professional arrangements across doctors in different work sectors. Both specialists in mixed practice and private practice differ from public sector specialists with regard to their annual earnings, sources of income, maternity and other leave taken and number of practice locations. Public sector specialists are likely to be younger, to be international medical graduates, devote a higher percentage of time to education and research, and are more likely to do after hours and on-call work compared with private sector specialists. Gender and total hours worked do not differ between doctors across the different practice types.

Health service use among patients with chronic or multiple illnesses, and frequent attenders: secondary analysis of routine primary care data from 1996 to 2006.

Little or no longitudinal data have been available to date on the utilization of primary care physicians' services, particularly by chronically ill and multimorbid patients and by those who see their primary care physician often ("frequent attenders"). We collected anonymous data on 305 896 patients from 155 primary care practices over the period 1996-2006 and analyzed them with descriptive statistics, correlations, and multiple logistic regression. Over the period of the study, patients visited their primary care physicians about 7 times per year on average. Frequent attendance, defined as 24 or more contacts per year, was not strongly associated with chronic illness or multimorbidity (r=0.19 and r=0.24, respectively) but was found to be linked to time-consuming medical services, such as detailed counseling (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.8) and house calls (OR, 3.5). Chronically ill patients utilized their primary care physicians' services less than we had expected. Chronic illness and multimorbidity were more common with increasing age; also correlated with age were the utilization of medical services, the number of visits to the primary care physician, and the number of visits to the primary care physician among frequent attenders. Although in Germany visits to physicians of all types (both primary care physicians and specialists) in private practice became more frequent in total over the period of this study, visits to primary care physicians alone did not. Frequent attenders do not necessarily have chronic illness or multimorbidity but seem to constitute a particularly problematic group. Chronic illness is not a predictor for greater utilization of primary care physicians' services.