Spanish American literature has been studied mostly through the thematic or biographical approach. The thematic approach has dwelt on geographical settings, classifying the works of fiction as novels of the pampa, novels of the sierra, and novels of the selva. The biographical approach, on the other hand, has surveyed the literary production chronologically-novel of the Colonial period, of the Period of Independence, of the Mexican Revolution, etc.-supplementing historical considerations with biographical notes on the writers of each of the periods. However interesting these approaches may be in relating literature to ecological patterns or to history, they have contributed but little to literary criticism. They have not been very helpful, for instance, in evaluating the intrinsically aesthetic merits of a work and have paid little or no attention to the complex problems of form, composition, and stylistic trends. Such classificatory terms as Realistic, Naturalistic, Existentialist do circulate in their writings but in rather superficial, desultory, or indiscriminating ways. We are told, for instance, that Echeverria was a poet, disregarding completely his Matadero, a precursory masterpiece of Naturalism; or that Dofia Bdrbara and La vordgine were robust specimens of Realism, overlooking their romantic tirades and psychological distortions. Hence the frequency with which one meets in university theses such titles as Romantic, Realistic and Naturalistic Elements in the Novels of R6mulo Gallegos and Jos6 Eustasio Rivera and El romanticismo esencial del realista Jos6 Rivera. Had the line of analysis followed a more rigorous examination into the emotional and stylistic peculiarities, it could have been ascertained that, at least in Latin American prose fiction, it is difficult if not impossible to categorize faithfully each movement. Even in those works which are taken as typical of certain schools or movements, classification fails. Jorge Isaacs' Maria cannot be dismissed as a Romantic novel pure and simple: the novel ends, as a matter of fact, with such detailed, concretely realistic pictures as the Salom6 episode and the homeward travelogue. In these penultimate and final sections there is almost as much realism as there is romanticism. The romantic and realistic persist side by side too in Giiiraldes, in Lynch, in Payr6, in Quiroga. Perhaps during one rather fleeting moment, with no significant consequences, one influence, in this case Zola's, seemed preponderant: Antonio Argerich's Inocentes o culpables (1884), Lucio V. L6pez' La gran aldea (1884), Eugenio Cambaceres' Sin rumbo (1885), JuliAn Martel's La Bolsa (1890). But even here one need only read carefully Sin rumbo, for instance, to observe that the author is leaning on the theories of Naturalism, its Achilles' heel, rather than imitating Zola's epic art. Cambaceres' Zolaism is surface veneer. His style moves towards a somewhat lyrical staccato-precursory, one may say, of Vargas Vila's.' Another man whose name has been associated with Zola's is Baldomero Lillo. Obviously there is some similarity due to the thematic affinity between Sub terra and Germinal, both dealing with the plight of the coal A paper read at the Spanish 4 Group Meeting of the 69th Annual Meeting of the MLA, New York, December 27-29, 1954.
Read full abstract